F(ab')2 Fragments to Overcome Daratumumab Interference in Transfusion Tests

Mitigation of therapeutic anti-CD38 antibody interference with fab fragments: How well does it perform?

BACKGROUND

Administration of anti-CD38 antibodies is a state-of-the-art therapy for patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma (MM). However, this treatment frequently leads to pan-agglutination of red blood cells (RBCs) in patients' serological testing making accurate blood typing and timely transfusion of compatible blood a challenging effort. The antigen masking indirect antiglobulin test (AMIAT) is an approach to address this diagnostic challenge.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A new reagent, called DaraEx plus, uses anti-CD38 Fab fragments to mitigate the anti-CD38 antibody interference in serological assays by masking CD38 on the cell surface. Its performance is extensively examined with commercial sera as well as with patient samples, and compared to the current standard method using dithiothreitol (DTT), which denatures the CD38 antigens on test panel erythrocytes.

RESULTS

In the Bio-Rad ID System, DaraEx plus effectively mitigated the interference caused by anti-CD38 antibodies in 86% of patient samples tested while DTT was successful in only 68%. Moreover, there was no negative influence on DTT-sensitive blood group systems such as KEL upon DaraEx plus treatment. The agglutination reactions of all tested anti-CD38 antibodies (Daratumumab, Felzartamab, and Isatuximab) were inhibited by DaraEx plus. The treatment was successful only if DaraEx plus was added to the test cells before the sample. Some of the other gel card systems tested showed background reactions with DaraEx plus-treated cells.

CONCLUSION

DaraEx plus treatment is straightforward and quick to perform. In the Bio-Rad ID System, it is superior to DTT treatment in the prevention of anti-CD38 antibody interference.

Effect of clinical application of anti-CD38 and anti-CD47 monoclonal antibodies on blood group detection and transfusion therapy and treatment

BACKGROUND

To investigate the effect of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAb) (daratumumab, DARA) and anti-CD47 mAb combined with azacytidine on blood transfusion compatibility tests, transfusion effects in the treatment of multiple myeloma or acute myeloid leukemia and the corresponding management strategy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among the 19 patients who were treated with DARA and anti-CD47 mAb, 4 patients with cross matching incompatibility were selected. The ABO blood group, the Rh blood group, irregular antibody screening and direct antiglobulin test (DAT) and cross matching testing were performed before and after the application of mAbs using serological methods. Then, irregular antibody screening and microcolumn gel cross matching tests were performed with donor and recipient erythrocytes and serum treated with DL-dithiothreitol (DTT) and Immucor kit, respectively. The transfusion effect was monitored.

RESULTS

21.05% (4/19) patients had mismatched cross-matching results after mAb treatment. The agglutination intensity of irregular antibody screening tests (3 + ∼ 4 +) after anti-CD47 mAb was higher than that (1 + ∼ 2 +) after DARA. In the DARA group, treating RBCs with 0.2 mol L^-1 DTT eliminated the DARA interference with antibody screening. In the anti-CD47 mAb group, the antibody screening, cross-matching test and DAT had been strongly interfered, and using Immucor kit eliminated the interference with antibody screening testing. There was no difference in the transfusion effect.

CONCLUSION

The application of mAb drugs led to incompatibility of cross matching tests, and the transfusion effect was not affected.

Efficient neutralization of daratumumab in pretransfusion samples using a novel recombinant monoclonal anti-idiotype antibody

BACKGROUND

Anti-CD38 antibodies such as daratumumab (DARA) are critical therapies for multiple myeloma and other diseases. Unfortunately, anti-CD38 antibodies cause panreactivity in indirect antiglobulin tests (IATs), complicating blood compatibility testing. The anti-CD38 interference is most often mitigated by treating reagent red blood cells (RBCs) with dithiothreitol (DTT). However, when using the DTT method, not all RBC antibody specificities can be detected (e.g., anti-K), and the DTT method is impractical for some transfusion services. We evaluated the ability of a new anti-idiotype antibody to neutralize DARA in vitro and eliminate the anti-CD38 interference.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A recombinant monoclonal rabbit anti-DARA idiotype antibody ("anti-DARA") was generated. The ratio of anti-DARA required to neutralize DARA in spiked samples was evaluated in IATs performed in gel. IATs performed in tube were used to demonstrate that anti-DARA allows alloantibody detection in the presence of DARA. Plasma samples from 29 patients receiving DARA were treated with a fixed quantity of anti-DARA (120 μg) before performing antibody detection tests (screens) in tube.

RESULTS

Anti-DARA used at or above a 1:1 ratio with DARA eliminated the DARA interference with IATs. Anti-DARA allowed detection of both alloanti-E and alloanti-K in the presence of DARA. In 27/29 (93.1%) clinical samples, 120 μg anti-DARA was sufficient to neutralize the DARA in 100 μl patient plasma.

DISCUSSION

An anti-DARA:DARA ratio as low as 1:1 is sufficient to neutralize DARA in solution. A fixed amount of anti-DARA eliminates the anti-CD38 interference in most patient samples.

Immunhämatologische Daratumumab-Interferenz im Verlauf einer Myelomtherapie

Anti-CD38-Antikörper werden vermehrt in der Klinik zur Behandlung von multiplen Myelomen und weiteren Indikationen eingesetzt. CD38 ist ein Oberflächenmolekül, das auf einer Reihe von Zellen und Geweben exprimiert wird, auch auf Erythrozyten. Nach Verabreichung von Anti-CD38-Antikörpern wie Daratumumab kommt es regelmäßig zur Interferenz im indirekten Antihumanglobulintest (IAT), was die Bestimmung irregulärer Antikörper behindert sowie auch die Zuverlässigkeit von Serumverträglichkeitsproben stark einschränkt. Mehrere Verfahren zum Umgang dieser Interferenz werden derzeit von der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhämatologie (DGTI) empfohlen. Wir stellen hier einen Vergleich zwischen der DTT-Methode und der Maskierung von CD38 durch ein neues Reagens an einem Patienten mit asekretorischem multiplen Myelom vor.

2-Mercaptoethanol (2-ME)-based IATs or Polybrene method mitigates the interference of daratumumab on blood compatibility tests

OBJECTIVES

Treating red blood cells (RBCs) with dithiothreitol (DTT) is a wildly-recommended to overcome the interference of the daratumumab (DARA) with blood compatibility testing. Nevertheless, DTT can be hard to obtain in the clinical laboratory, while its use in routine practice may be time-consuming. In the following study, we explored the feasibility of using a commercial 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME) working solution or the time-saving Polybrene method to mitigate DARA interference.

METHODS

Antibody screening and cross-matching were performed using 2-ME or DTT-based indirect antiglobulin tests (IATs) and Polybrene method (with human IgG anti-E same IATs titer as DARA as positive control) on 37 samples. Most clinically important blood group antigens on RBCs were detected after treatment with 2-ME or DTT.

RESULTS

Treating RBCs with 2-ME eliminates the DARA interference with the antibody screening or cross-matching; yet, K antigen is denatured during treatment. DARA does not interfere with antibody screening and cross-matching via Polybrene method, while 2+ agglutinations of anti-E antibody with the same titer (IATs method) as DARA could be observed in the positive controls via this method.

CONCLUSION

2-ME-based IATs or Polybrene method could replace DTT-based IATs to mitigate DARA interference.

Overcoming Drug Interference in Transfusion Testing: A Spotlight on Daratumumab

Daratumumab, a monoclonal antibody therapeutic, is highly efficacious and widely used in all stages of multiple myeloma and amyloidosis and has promising activity in other hematologic disorders. Daratumumab interacts with red blood cells, interfering with pre-transfusion testing. This interference can lead to compromising transfusion safety, extensive blood bank work ups and delays in provision of compatible units. Several methods have been developed to negate daratumumab interference with indirect antiglobulin testing. They are based on i) standard blood bank techniques including dithiothreitol and enzymatic treatment of reagent cells, using reagent red blood cells negative for CD38, ii) blocking CD38 antigens on reagent or donor cells, iii) neutralization of anti-CD38 antibody in patient plasma prior to testing, and iv) extended antigen typing of patient red blood cells in conjunction with provision of phenotypically matched units for transfusion. Implementation of those methods by the blood bank should be a planned effort coordinated with the patient’s clinical team. Timely involvement of blood bank and transfusion services and educational efforts by both blood banks and clinical providers can improve the overall daratumumab safety profile in regard to blood transfusion.

Impact of new myeloma agents on the transfusion laboratory

Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy targeting CD38 and CD47 antigens expressed on cancer cells has transformed therapy options for patients with multiple myeloma as well as other haematological and non-haematological malignancies. While the on target effects of these new drugs highlight the promise of precision cancer therapeutics, the unintended, off target binding of drugs to red blood cells (RBCs) and platelets has required transfusion service laboratories (TSL) and immunohaematology reference laboratories (IRL) to innovate and rapidly set up processes and testing protocols to overcome the significant interference in routine pre-transfusion tests caused by these agents. Binding of anti-CD38 and anti-CD47 drugs to reagent RBCs leads to false positive pan-agglutination during the antihuman globulin phase of testing, making it difficult to rule out underlying alloantibodies, and leading to delays in setting up compatible units for RBC transfusion. Anti-CD47 agents can also interfere with ABO/Rh typing studies. Several methods to successfully mitigate interference have been described, such as treatment of reagent RBCs with reducing agents or enzymes, allogeneic RBC adsorption studies and drug specific neutralisation assays; all methods have limitations. TSLs should select an approach that best fits their workflow and expertise and takes into consideration their level of access to specialised outside testing, local blood supplier capabilities, and the type of patient population served. For platelet refractory patients, samples should be tested by platelet antibody assays that are known to be unaffected by drug therapy. RBC transfusion support for multiple myeloma patients receiving anti-CD38 or anti-CD47 drugs can be optimised by establishing good communication between the clinical teams and TSLs, building electronic notification processes, and ensuring timely completion of baseline pre-transfusion testing and RBC phenotype/genotype prior to starting therapy. Staff education, standardisation of laboratory mitigation measures, and implementation of testing algorithms that consider mAb-induced interference when working up a pan-agglutinin help to significantly decrease delays that would otherwise result if standard methods were employed to complete antibody identification studies.

Daratumumab interference in flow cytometric anti-granulocyte antibody testing can be overcome using non-human blocking antibodies

BACKGROUND

Daratumumab (DARA), a human IgG1_K monoclonal antibody targeting CD38, is used to treat refractory multiple myeloma patients. CD38 is expressed on many cell types (RBCs, granulocytes, lymphocytes, etc.), and thus, DARA can interfere with serological tests. Information regarding how DARA affects anti-granulocyte antibody (AGA) testing and optimal neutralization of DARA will help laboratories perform accurate testing.

METHODS

Screening of AGA was performed by the granulocyte agglutination test (GAT) and the flow cytometric granulocyte immunofluorescence test (Flow-GIFT). Samples were tested from patients on DARA (n = 7), non-transfused blood donors (healthy controls, n = 7) and AGA reactive samples (positive controls, n = 5). Two neutralization experiments, CD38 removal with DTT and DARA epitope blockage with mouse anti-CD38, were evaluated.

RESULTS

Positive reactivity of human IgG binding was observed in 5/7 DARA cases when tested by Flow-GIFT; however, all 7 cases had negative GAT agglutination results. Further studies by Flow-GIFT revealed DARA concentrations >0·63 μg/ml bound to granulocytes. DARA binding was negated by DTT though a reduced Flow-GIFT sensitivity was observed in positive control samples due to increased background detection of human IgG. Mouse anti-CD38 neutralized the detection of human IgG observed in DARA-treated patient serum without effecting controls.

CONCLUSION

We established that DARA can interfere with AGA testing, leading to false positive Flow-GIFT results without causing GAT agglutination. DTT treatment increased background binding of secondary antibodies causing a decrease in Flow-GIFT sensitivity. In comparison, blockage of the DARA binding epitope using mouse anti-CD38 antibody was effective in neutralizing DARA interference while maintaining Flow-GIFT sensitivity.

Daudi cell stroma: An alternative to dithiothreitol to resolve daratumumab interference in pretransfusion testing

Treatment of red blood cells with dithiothreitol (DTT) or trypsin effectively denatures CD38; however, this treatment damages other antigens, some of which are of clinical importance. Thus, other avenues to deplete daratumumab (DARA) from plasma samples should be explored.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The Daudi B-cell line was found to express high levels of CD38 and was sonicated in a sonication buffer to achieve complete cell lysis. The resulting stroma preparation was centrifuged at 20 000g for 20 minutes and then mixed with 250 μL of DARA-plasma and incubated for 10 minutes at 37°C. The stroma-DARA-plasma mixture was centrifuged again, and the supernatant was collected and subjected to four additional rounds of adsorption with fresh stroma. DARA-depleted plasma was tested by gel indirect antiglobulin test (IAT).

RESULTS

CD38 expression on Daudi cells was confirmed by flow cytometry. Gel IAT analysis showed that the incubation of plasma from DARA-treated patients with Daudi cells stroma resulted in a significant depletion of DARA but allowing detection of other alloantibodies of interest such as anti-K, anti-Yt^a , and anti-Gy^a .

CONCLUSIONS

Daudi cell stroma is inexpensive, easy to prepare in large batches, and can be used as an off-the-shelf reagent. Incubation of plasma from DARA-treated patients with Daudi cell stroma can efficiently overcome DARA interference in serologic testing without affecting DTT- or trypsin-sensitive antigens.

New method for overcoming the interference produced by anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies in compatibility testing

BACKGROUND

Plasma of patients taking anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) leads to panagglutination in the indirect antiglobulin test (IAT), that can mask clinically significant alloantibodies. Dithiothreitol (DTT) treatment of test RBCs is the more widespread method for avoiding this interference. Current DTT 0.2 mol/L method is time consuming and damages several red blood groups antigens. This study aims to evaluate low concentration DTT treatment of RBCs adapted for gel testing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four DTT concentrations (0.01, 0.02, 0.03, and 0.04 mol/L), and three gel test brands were evaluated on six DARA patient's samples. Briefly, the method consists of pipetting 50 μL of 0.8% RBCs on AHG micro columns, followed by 25 μL of DTT, thoroughly mixing and 15 min incubation at 37 °C. Then, 25 μL of serum/plasma is added to proceed to IAT. In order to asses the effect of DTT 0.04 mol/L on different blood group antigens, serial dilutions of sera containing anti-K, -k, -Kp^b, -Lu^b, -Yt^a and anti-JMH antibodies were tested against DTT-RBCs. One sample of a DARA patient with known alloantibodies as well as samples of two patients inoculated with anti-K and anti-Fy^a were evaluated.

RESULTS

RBCs treatment with DTT 0.04 mol/L for 15 min completely eliminated anti CD38 panagglutination in all samples studied and worked with different reactivity intensities in IAT and gel brands. The new method allowed the detection of underlying anti-D, anti-E, anti-K and anti-Fy^a alloantibodies. Titration assays demonstrated no denaturation of Kell, Lutheran, Cartwright and JMH antigens.

DISCUSSION

The new DTT method adapted for gel testing is efficacious, simple and only adds 15 min over regular IAT. Pheno/genotyping before DARA treatment or transfusion of K negative RBCs may be unnecessary.

Risk of RBC alloimmunization in multiple myeloma patients treated by Daratumumab

BACKGROUND

Daratumumab (DARA) is a human monoclonal antibody for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). DARA binds to CD38 on RBCs and interferes with detection of RBC alloantibodies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the risk of RBC alloimmunization in MM patients treated with DARA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of the complete serological profile and transfusion history of 45 MM patients received transfusion and treated with DARA from July 2015 to December 2018 was undertaken. All cases with positive Ab screens were treated with DTT to identify RBC alloantibodies. RBC transfusion history was monitored between the first DARA dose to the last or extending to the first negative Ab screen after the last DARA dose if the Ab screen was ever positive. Forty-six MM patients received transfusion but not DARA were studied as control group.

RESULTS

Totally 184 Ab screens were done on 45 patients transfused with ABO-Rh compatible RBCs, phenotypically matched units or both. None of them showed detectable alloantibodies after DTT treatment. The duration of Ab screening positivity varied markedly, ranging from 25 days to 5 months after the last dose. Two of 46 patients in the control group had preexisting alloantibodies but no new alloantibodies were detected during study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that the risk of forming new RBC alloantibodies after transfusion in MM patients treated with current regimens is very low and no DARA-associated difference in the alloimmunization risk. No significant difference in alloimmunization is detected between ABO-Rh compatible and phenotypically matched transfusion.

The effects of monoclonal anti-CD47 on RBCs, compatibility testing, and transfusion requirements in refractory acute myeloid leukemia

BACKGROUND

CD47 is a novel therapeutic target in the treatment of solid-organ and hematologic malignancies. CD47 is also expressed on RBCs. Here, we report our experience of the RBC effects and the impact on blood bank testing and transfusion management in a Phase 1 trial of the humanized anti-CD47 monoclonal antibody Hu5F9-G4 in relapsed or primary refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (NCT02678338).

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Nineteen patients with relapsed or primary refractory AML treated across five UK centers were included for analysis. Patients received escalating doses of Hu5F9-G4. Serial laboratory data were collected to evaluate impact on hemoglobin (Hb), markers of hemolysis (bilirubin, lactate dehydrogenase, reticulocyte count), transfusion requirements, and blood compatibility testing.

RESULTS

A decline in Hb was observed with drug administration (median Hb change, -1.0 g/dL; range, 0.4-1.6) with associated increase in transfusion requirements. Patients responded to transfusion with a median Hb increment per unit of 1.0 g/dL. RBC agglutination was seen in all cases without associated change in Hb, lactate dehydrogenase, bilirubin, or reticulocyte count. Nine of 19 (47%) patients developed a newly positive antibody screen with a pan-agglutinin identified in plasma. Invalid ABO blood grouping occurred in 4 of 12 (33%) non-group O patients due to anomalous reactivity in the reverse ABO-type results.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with Hu5F9-G4 in patients with AML resulted in an Hb decline and increased transfusion requirements. Problems with ABO blood typing and compatibility testing were widely observed and should be expected by centers treating recipients of Hu5F9-G4.

Daratumumab in multiple myeloma

The development of effective monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of myeloma has been a long journey of clinical and drug development. Identification of the right target antigen was a critical part of the process. CD38 as a target has been considered for some time, but clinically, daratumumab, a CD38 monoclonal antibody, was the first to be tested, and it has delivered the best clinical responses as a single agent to date. Its proven safety and efficacy in combination with other antimyeloma agents have led to several US Food and Drug Administration approvals for treating myeloma. Furthermore, the results of early trials in the induction therapy setting have demonstrated a beneficial role when it is added to the existing induction regimens. This review summarizes the importance of CD38 as a target and examines the clinical development of the CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab and its clinical significance in combination regimens in both patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma and patients with newly diagnosed myeloma.

The impact of Daratumumab on transfusion service costs

BACKGROUND

Daratumumab (DARA) is a human IgG1κ monoclonal antibody directed against CD38, approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma. As CD38 is expressed on RBCs, DARA can interfere with pretransfusion testing. DARA interference can be negated by denaturation of CD38 on RBCs with dithiothreitol (DTT) reagents. Because of this interference in pretransfusion testing, our hospital implemented a notification and testing/transfusion algorithm (NATTA) for pretransfusion testing and RBC product provision for DARA patients. This standardized approach combines DTT-based testing with selective genotyping and the provision of phenotypically similar RBCs for patients with clinically significant antibodies.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We evaluated pretransfusion test results and transfusion requirements for 91 DARA patients in an academic medical center over 1 year to determine the incremental cost of pretransfusion testing and RBC selection. The actual costs for the NATTA approach were compared to a theoretical approach using universal genotyping with a provision of phenotypically similar RBC transfusions.

RESULTS

The annual cost of testing related to DARA after NATTA implementation was $535.76 per patient. The simulated annual cost for the alternative genotyping with provision of phenotypically similar RBC transfusions approach was $934.83 per patient.

CONCLUSION

In our entire cohort of DARA patients, a DTT-based testing algorithm with selective genotyping and provision of phenotypically similar RBCs only for patients with clinically significant antibodies was less expensive than a simulated model of universal genotyping and provision of phenotypically similar RBCs.

Blood Transfusion Management for Patients Treated With Anti-CD38 Monoclonal Antibodies

Daratumumab has proven to be highly efficacious for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM) and has recently been approved in the frontline setting for MM patients ineligible for transplantation. In the future, expanded indications are possible for daratumumab and other anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies in development. For several years, it has been recognized that these therapies interfere with blood bank testing by binding to CD38 on red blood cells and causing panagglutination on the Indirect Antiglobulin Test. This can lead to redundant testing and significant delays in patient care. Given the anticipated increase in utilization of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, as well as the transfusion needs of MM patients, it is critical to understand the nature of this interference with blood bank testing and to optimize clinical and laboratory procedures. In this review, we summarize the pathophysiology of this phenomenon, examine the clinical data reported to date, describe currently available methods to resolve this issue, and lastly provide a guide to clinical management of blood transfusions for patients receiving anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies.

Distinct effects of daratumumab on indirect and direct antiglobulin tests: a new method employing 0.01 mol/L dithiothreitol for negating the daratumumab interference with preserving K antigenicity (Osaka method)

BACKGROUND

There is an increasing demand for daratumumab (DARA), an immunoglobulin (Ig)G1κ monoclonal antibody (MoAb) that recognizes CD38, to manage relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patients. However, DARA leads to positive and panreactive agglutination reactions in indirect antiglobulin tests (IATs) in vitro (the DARA interference). In addition, effects of DARA on red blood cells (RBCs) in vivo remains elusive.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

To develop a new method to negate the DARA interference, the effects of various concentrations of dithiothreitol (DTT) on RBC CD38 and Kell antigenicity in combination with an automatic blood cell washing centrifuge were compared with the AABB standard procedure in parallel. Moreover, direct antiglobulin tests (DATs) for RBCs in DARA-treated MM patients were examined.

RESULTS

A quantity of 0.01 mol/L DTT as well as the AABB procedure (equivalent to 0.15 mol/L DTT in our procedure) markedly reduced the reactivity of phycoerythrin-mouse anti-CD38 MoAb and DARA with RBCs. In sharp contrast to the AABB procedure, 0.01 mol/L DTT partially preserved K antigenicity and allowed the determination of phenotype of K antigen even in the presence of the DARA interference. In contrast, DAT for RBCs obtained from MM patients showed a weak positive or negative reaction. Immunoblotting further indicated that DARA induced loss of CD38 in vivo.

CONCLUSION

A simple and reliable method to negate the DARA interference with partially preserving Kell antigenicity is proposed (Osaka method). CD38 antigenicity is susceptible to 0.01 mol/L DTT treatment even in the presence of DARA. Our data also demonstrate distinct effects of DARA on IAT in vitro and DAT in vivo.