1
|
Chong LM, Wang P, Lee VV, Vijayakumar S, Tan HQ, Wang FQ, Yeoh TDYY, Truong ATL, Tan LWJ, Tan SB, Senthil Kumar K, Hau E, Vellayappan BA, Blasiak A, Ho D. Radiation therapy with phenotypic medicine: towards N-of-1 personalization. Br J Cancer 2024:10.1038/s41416-024-02653-3. [PMID: 38514762 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02653-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
In current clinical practice, radiotherapy (RT) is prescribed as a pre-determined total dose divided over daily doses (fractions) given over several weeks. The treatment response is typically assessed months after the end of RT. However, the conventional one-dose-fits-all strategy may not achieve the desired outcome, owing to patient and tumor heterogeneity. Therefore, a treatment strategy that allows for RT dose personalization based on each individual response is preferred. Multiple strategies have been adopted to address this challenge. As an alternative to current known strategies, artificial intelligence (AI)-derived mechanism-independent small data phenotypic medicine (PM) platforms may be utilized for N-of-1 RT personalization. Unlike existing big data approaches, PM does not engage in model refining, training, and validation, and guides treatment by utilizing prospectively collected patient's own small datasets. With PM, clinicians may guide patients' RT dose recommendations using their responses in real-time and potentially avoid over-treatment in good responders and under-treatment in poor responders. In this paper, we discuss the potential of engaging PM to guide clinicians on upfront dose selections and ongoing adaptations during RT, as well as considerations and limitations for implementation. For practicing oncologists, clinical trialists, and researchers, PM can either be implemented as a standalone strategy or in complement with other existing RT personalizations. In addition, PM can either be used for monotherapeutic RT personalization, or in combination with other therapeutics (e.g. chemotherapy, targeted therapy). The potential of N-of-1 RT personalization with drugs will also be presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Ming Chong
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Design and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117583, Singapore
- The N.1 Institute for Health (N.1), National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117456, Singapore
- The Institute for Digital Medicine (WisDM), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117456, Singapore
| | - Peter Wang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Design and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117583, Singapore
- The N.1 Institute for Health (N.1), National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117456, Singapore
- The Institute for Digital Medicine (WisDM), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117456, Singapore
| | - V Vien Lee
- The N.1 Institute for Health (N.1), National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117456, Singapore
| | - Smrithi Vijayakumar
- The N.1 Institute for Health (N.1), National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117456, Singapore
| | - Hong Qi Tan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Fu Qiang Wang
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | | | - Anh T L Truong
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Design and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117583, Singapore
- The N.1 Institute for Health (N.1), National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117456, Singapore
- The Institute for Digital Medicine (WisDM), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117456, Singapore
| | - Lester Wen Jeit Tan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Design and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117583, Singapore
- The N.1 Institute for Health (N.1), National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117456, Singapore
- The Institute for Digital Medicine (WisDM), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117456, Singapore
| | - Shi Bei Tan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Design and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117583, Singapore
- The N.1 Institute for Health (N.1), National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117456, Singapore
- The Institute for Digital Medicine (WisDM), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117456, Singapore
| | - Kirthika Senthil Kumar
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Design and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117583, Singapore
- The N.1 Institute for Health (N.1), National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117456, Singapore
| | - Eric Hau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Blacktown Haematology and Cancer Care Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Westmead Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, Westmead Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Balamurugan A Vellayappan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, 119074, Singapore.
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
| | - Agata Blasiak
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Design and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117583, Singapore.
- The N.1 Institute for Health (N.1), National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117456, Singapore.
- The Institute for Digital Medicine (WisDM), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117456, Singapore.
- Department of Pharmacology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117600, Singapore.
| | - Dean Ho
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Design and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117583, Singapore.
- The N.1 Institute for Health (N.1), National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117456, Singapore.
- The Institute for Digital Medicine (WisDM), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117456, Singapore.
- Department of Pharmacology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117600, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Siak PY, Heng WS, Teoh SSH, Lwin YY, Cheah SC. Precision medicine in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: comprehensive review of past, present, and future prospect. J Transl Med 2023; 21:786. [PMID: 37932756 PMCID: PMC10629096 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-04673-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is an aggressive malignancy with high propensity for lymphatic spread and distant metastasis. It is prominent as an endemic malignancy in Southern China and Southeast Asia regions. Studies on NPC pathogenesis mechanism in the past decades such as through Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) infection and oncogenic molecular aberrations have explored several potential targets for therapy and diagnosis. The EBV infection introduces oncoviral proteins that consequently hyperactivate many promitotic pathways and block cell-death inducers. EBV infection is so prevalent in NPC patients such that EBV serological tests were used to diagnose and screen NPC patients. On the other hand, as the downstream effectors of oncogenic mechanisms, the promitotic pathways can potentially be exploited therapeutically. With the apparent heterogeneity and distinct molecular aberrations of NPC tumor, the focus has turned into a more personalized treatment in NPC. Herein in this comprehensive review, we depict the current status of screening, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention in NPC. Subsequently, based on the limitations on those aspects, we look at their potential improvements in moving towards the path of precision medicine. The importance of recent advances on the key molecular aberration involved in pathogenesis of NPC for precision medicine progression has also been reported in the present review. Besides, the challenge and future outlook of NPC management will also be highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pui Yan Siak
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, UCSI University, Bandar Springhill, 71010, Port Dickson, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
| | - Win Sen Heng
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, UCSI University, Bandar Springhill, 71010, Port Dickson, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
| | - Sharon Siew Hoon Teoh
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, UCSI University, Bandar Springhill, 71010, Port Dickson, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
| | - Yu Yu Lwin
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Medicine, Mandalay, Myanmar
| | - Shiau-Chuen Cheah
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, UCSI University, Bandar Springhill, 71010, Port Dickson, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gordon K, Smyk D, Gulidov I, Golubev K, Fatkhudinov T. An Overview of Head and Neck Tumor Reirradiation: What Has Been Achieved So Far? Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4409. [PMID: 37686685 PMCID: PMC10486419 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The recurrence rate of head and neck cancers (HNCs) after initial treatment may reach 70%, and poor prognosis is reported in most cases. Curative options for recurrent HNCs mainly depend on the treatment history and the recurrent tumor localization. Reirradiation for HNCs is effective and has been included in most guidelines. However, the option remains clinically challenging due to high incidence of severe toxicity, especially in cases of quick infield recurrence. Recent technical advances in radiation therapy (RT) provide the means for upgrade in reirradiation protocols. While the majority of hospitals stay focused on conventional and widely accessible modulated RTs, the particle therapy options emerge as tolerable and providing further treatment opportunities for recurrent HNCs. Still, the progress is impeded by high heterogeneity of the data and the lack of large-scale prospective studies. This review aimed to summarize the outcomes of reirradiation for HNCs in the clinical perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantin Gordon
- A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center, Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (A. Tsyb MRRC), 4, Korolev Street, 249036 Obninsk, Russia; (D.S.); (I.G.); (K.G.)
- Medical Institute, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Miklukho-Maklaya Street 8, 117198 Moscow, Russia;
| | - Daniil Smyk
- A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center, Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (A. Tsyb MRRC), 4, Korolev Street, 249036 Obninsk, Russia; (D.S.); (I.G.); (K.G.)
- Medical Institute, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Miklukho-Maklaya Street 8, 117198 Moscow, Russia;
| | - Igor Gulidov
- A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center, Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (A. Tsyb MRRC), 4, Korolev Street, 249036 Obninsk, Russia; (D.S.); (I.G.); (K.G.)
| | - Kirill Golubev
- A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center, Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (A. Tsyb MRRC), 4, Korolev Street, 249036 Obninsk, Russia; (D.S.); (I.G.); (K.G.)
| | - Timur Fatkhudinov
- Medical Institute, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Miklukho-Maklaya Street 8, 117198 Moscow, Russia;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Uysal E, Aksaray F, Dincer S, Altın S. Robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Indian J Cancer 2023; 60:353-358. [PMID: 36861705 DOI: 10.4103/ijc.ijc_1414_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Background We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients reirradiated with stereotactic body radiotherapy for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (r-NPC) in our hospital. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 10 patients with r-NPC previously irradiated with definitive radiotherapy. Local recurrences were irradiated with a dose of 25 to 50 Gy (median: 26.25 Gy) in 3 to 5 fractions (fr) (median: 5 fr). The survival outcomes calculated from the time of recurrence diagnosis were obtained using Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared with the log-rank test. Toxicities were assessed by using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 5.0. Results The median age was 55 years (37-79 years), and nine patients were men. The median follow-up was 26 months (3-65 months) after reirradiation. The median overall survival (OS) was 40 months, OS in 1 and 3 years were 80% and 57%, respectively. OS rate of rT4 (n = 5, 50%) was worse compared with rT1, rT2, and rT3 (P = 0.040). In addition, those with less than 24 months of interval between first treatment and recurrence had worse OS (P = 0.017). One patient exhibited Grade 3 toxicity. There is no other Grade ≥3 acute or late toxicities. Conclusion In r-NPC, reirradiation is inevitable for patients who are not suitable for radical surgical resection. However, serious complications and side effects prevent dose escalation due to the critical structures previously irradiated. Prospective studies with a large number of patients are required to find the optimal acceptable dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emre Uysal
- Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sisli, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ferdi Aksaray
- Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sisli, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Selvi Dincer
- Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sisli, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Suleyman Altın
- Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sisli, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ng WT, But B, Wong CH, Choi CW, Chua ML, Blanchard P, Lee AW. Particle beam therapy for nasopharyngeal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 37:41-56. [PMID: 36065359 PMCID: PMC9440257 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Particle beam therapy yields excellent short-term treatment outcomes among NPC patients. Particle beam therapy is generally safe in primary and recurrent NPC patients, with ≥G3 late toxicity rates of 20 % or less. An approximately 5% mortality rate was reported among recurrent NPC patients.
Background/purpose A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to better understand the benefits of particle beam therapy for nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) treatment. The survival outcomes and toxicity of primary and recurrent NPC patients treated with proton or carbon ion beam therapy were investigated. Method PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were searched between 1 January 2007 to 3 November 2021. The inclusion and exclusion criteria included studies with either primary or recurrent NPC patients, sample size of ≥10 patients, and proton or carbon ion beam therapy as interventions. Twenty-six eligible studies with a total of 1502 patients were included. We used a random-effect meta-analysis to examine the impact of particle beam therapy on primary NPC patients and qualitatively described the results among recurrent patients. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), while secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC) and toxicity. Results The pooled OS at 1-year, 2-year and 3-year and 5-year for primary NPC patients who received particle beam therapy were 96 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) = 92 %-98 %), 93 % (95 % CI = 83 %-97 %), 90 % (95 % CI = 73 %-97 %) and 73 % (95 % CI = 52 %-87 %) respectively. The pooled 1-year and 2-year PFS, and LC for these patients were above 90 %. For locally recurrent NPC patients, the 1-year OS rate ranged from 65 % to 92 %, while the 1-year LC rate ranged from 80 % to 88 %. Both proton and carbon ion beam therapy were generally safe among primary and recurrent patients, with ≥G3 late toxicity rates of 20 % or less. Approximately a 5 % mortality rate was reported among recurrent patients. Conclusions This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated particle beam therapy has great potential in treating NPC, yielding excellent survival outcomes with low toxicity. However, further investigations are needed to assess the long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of this newer form of radiotherapy.
Collapse
|
6
|
Peng Z, Wang Y, Fan R, Gao K, Xie S, Wang F, Zhang J, Zhang H, He Y, Xie Z, Jiang W. Treatment of Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Sequential Challenge. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14174111. [PMID: 36077648 PMCID: PMC9454547 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14174111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma is one of the major causes of death among NPC patients. However, there are no international guidelines for the treatment of patients with recurrent NPC now. In this article, we summarize past publications on clinical research and mechanistic studies related to recurrent NPC, combined with the experience and lessons learned by our institutional multidisciplinary team in the treatment of recurrent NPC. We propose an objective protocol for the treatment of recurrent NPC. Abstract Recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), which occurs in 10–20% of patients with primary NPC after the initial treatment modality of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), is one of the major causes of death among NPC patients. Patients with recurrent disease without distant metastases still have a chance to be saved, but re-treatment often carries more serious toxicities or higher risks. For this group of patients, both otolaryngologists and oncologists are committed to developing more appropriate treatment regimens that can prolong patient survival and improve survival therapy. Currently, there are no international guidelines for the treatment of patients with recurrent NPC. In this article, we summarize past publications on clinical research and mechanistic studies related to recurrent NPC, combined with the experience and lessons learned by our institutional multidisciplinary team in the treatment of recurrent NPC. We propose an objective protocol for the treatment of recurrent NPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhouying Peng
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
- Otolaryngology Major Disease Research Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha 410008, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
- Anatomy Laboratory of Division of Nose and Cranial Base, Clinical Anatomy Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
| | - Yumin Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
- Otolaryngology Major Disease Research Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha 410008, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
- Anatomy Laboratory of Division of Nose and Cranial Base, Clinical Anatomy Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
| | - Ruohao Fan
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
- Otolaryngology Major Disease Research Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha 410008, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
- Anatomy Laboratory of Division of Nose and Cranial Base, Clinical Anatomy Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
| | - Kelei Gao
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
- Otolaryngology Major Disease Research Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha 410008, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
- Anatomy Laboratory of Division of Nose and Cranial Base, Clinical Anatomy Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
| | - Shumin Xie
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
- Otolaryngology Major Disease Research Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha 410008, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
- Anatomy Laboratory of Division of Nose and Cranial Base, Clinical Anatomy Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
| | - Fengjun Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
- Otolaryngology Major Disease Research Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha 410008, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
- Anatomy Laboratory of Division of Nose and Cranial Base, Clinical Anatomy Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
| | - Junyi Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
- Otolaryngology Major Disease Research Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha 410008, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
- Anatomy Laboratory of Division of Nose and Cranial Base, Clinical Anatomy Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
| | - Hua Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
- Otolaryngology Major Disease Research Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha 410008, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
- Anatomy Laboratory of Division of Nose and Cranial Base, Clinical Anatomy Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
| | - Yuxiang He
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
| | - Zhihai Xie
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
- Otolaryngology Major Disease Research Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha 410008, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
- Anatomy Laboratory of Division of Nose and Cranial Base, Clinical Anatomy Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
| | - Weihong Jiang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
- Otolaryngology Major Disease Research Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha 410008, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
- Anatomy Laboratory of Division of Nose and Cranial Base, Clinical Anatomy Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Beddok A, Saint‐Martin C, Krhili S, Eddine CA, Champion L, Chilles A, Goudjil F, Zefkili S, Amessis M, Peurien D, Choussy O, le Tourneau C, Dendale R, Buvat I, Créhange G, Calugaru V. Curative high‐dose reirradiation for patients with recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma using IMRT or proton therapy: Outcomes and analysis of patterns of failure. Head Neck 2022; 44:2452-2464. [DOI: 10.1002/hed.27153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaud Beddok
- PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department Institut Curie Paris/Orsay France
- PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Inserm LITO U1288 Institut Curie Orsay France
| | | | - Samar Krhili
- PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department Institut Curie Paris/Orsay France
| | | | | | - Anne Chilles
- PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department Institut Curie Paris/Orsay France
| | - Farid Goudjil
- PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department Institut Curie Paris/Orsay France
| | - Sofia Zefkili
- PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department Institut Curie Paris/Orsay France
| | - Malika Amessis
- PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department Institut Curie Paris/Orsay France
| | - Dominique Peurien
- PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department Institut Curie Paris/Orsay France
| | - Olivier Choussy
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery Institut Curie Paris France
| | - Christophe le Tourneau
- Department of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), INSERM U900 Research unit Paris‐Saclay University. Institut Curie Paris France
| | - Remi Dendale
- PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department Institut Curie Paris/Orsay France
| | - Irene Buvat
- PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Inserm LITO U1288 Institut Curie Orsay France
| | - Gilles Créhange
- PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department Institut Curie Paris/Orsay France
| | - Valentin Calugaru
- PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department Institut Curie Paris/Orsay France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Duan BF, Chen HY, Zheng XM, He Q. Acquired unilateral alopecia after arterial infusion chemotherapy in a recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2022; 5:e1671. [PMID: 35861475 PMCID: PMC9575488 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Revised: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Intractable nasopharyngeal hemorrhage is a severe complication with high mortality rate in patients with radiation therapy (RT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) that requires emergency treatment. Quite a few of them combine with tumor recurrence. Treatment planning for these patients is extremely difficult for oncologists, and effective treatments are lacking. Case A 42‐year‐old man had a history of recurrent NPC that was treated with 2 cycles of chemoradiotherapies from 2017 to 2019. Five months after the second round of chemoradiotherapy, an episode of massive nasal bleeding occurred. As positron emission tomography (PET) scan revealed tumor recurrence in the left wall of nasopharynx, superselective embolization and subsequent intra‐arterial infusion (IA, 4 times of cisplatin 60 mg + fluorouracil 1.0 g) were performed to stop bleeding and achieve tumor control. To date, the disease‐free survival time has been over 1 year. No tumor recurrence or rebleeding is found except for alopecia on the left side. Conclusions Interventional radiology is important and effective in the treatment of recurrent NPC for both massive nasal bleeding and tumor control. However, the unique complication of unilateral alopecia should not be ignored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bao-Feng Duan
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Hua-Ying Chen
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Xue-Mei Zheng
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Qing He
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ward MC, Koyfman SA, Bakst RL, Margalit DN, Beadle BM, Beitler JJ, Chang SSW, Cooper JS, Galloway TJ, Ridge JA, Robbins JR, Sacco AG, Tsai CJ, Yom SS, Siddiqui F. Retreatment of Recurrent or Second Primary Head and Neck Cancer After Prior Radiation: Executive Summary of the American Radium Society® (ARS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC): Expert Panel on Radiation Oncology - Head and Neck Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 113:759-786. [PMID: 35398456 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.03.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Re-treatment of recurrent or second primary head and neck cancers occurring in a previously irradiated field is complex. Few guidelines exist to support practice. METHODS We performed an updated literature search of peer-reviewed journals in a systematic fashion. Search terms, key questions, and associated clinical case variants were formed by panel consensus. The literature search informed the committee during a blinded vote on the appropriateness of treatment options via the modified Delphi method. RESULTS The final number of citations retained for review was 274. These informed five key questions, which focused on patient selection, adjuvant re-irradiation, definitive re-irradiation, stereotactic body radiation (SBRT), and re-irradiation to treat non-squamous cancer. Results of the consensus voting are presented along with discussion of the most current evidence. CONCLUSIONS This provides updated evidence-based recommendations and guidelines for the re-treatment of recurrent or second primary cancer of the head and neck.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew C Ward
- Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina; Southeast Radiation Oncology Group, Charlotte, North Carolina.
| | | | | | - Danielle N Margalit
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Beth M Beadle
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | | | | | | | | | - John A Ridge
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jared R Robbins
- University of Arizona College of Medicine Tucson, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Assuntina G Sacco
- University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California
| | - C Jillian Tsai
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sue S Yom
- University of California, San Francisco, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Affiliation(s)
- Nader Mohamed
- Department of Radiation Oncology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY USA
| | - Anna Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX USA
| | - Nancy Y. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wong KCW, Hui EP, Lo KW, Lam WKJ, Johnson D, Li L, Tao Q, Chan KCA, To KF, King AD, Ma BBY, Chan ATC. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an evolving paradigm. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2021; 18:679-695. [PMID: 34194007 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-021-00524-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 157] [Impact Index Per Article: 52.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The past three decades have borne witness to many advances in the understanding of the molecular biology and treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), an Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated cancer endemic to southern China, southeast Asia and north Africa. In this Review, we provide a comprehensive, interdisciplinary overview of key research findings regarding NPC pathogenesis, treatment, screening and biomarker development. We describe how technological advances have led to the advent of proton therapy and other contemporary radiotherapy approaches, and emphasize the relentless efforts to identify the optimal sequencing of chemotherapy with radiotherapy through decades of clinical trials. Basic research into the pathogenic role of EBV and the genomic, epigenomic and immune landscape of NPC has laid the foundations of translational research. The latter, in turn, has led to the development of new biomarkers and therapeutic targets and of improved approaches for individualizing immunotherapy and targeted therapies for patients with NPC. We provide historical context to illustrate the effect of these advances on treatment outcomes at present. We describe current preclinical and clinical challenges and controversies in the hope of providing insights for future investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth C W Wong
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Edwin P Hui
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Kwok-Wai Lo
- Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Wai Kei Jacky Lam
- Department of Chemical Pathology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - David Johnson
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Lili Li
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Qian Tao
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Kwan Chee Allen Chan
- Department of Chemical Pathology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Ka-Fai To
- Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Ann D King
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Brigette B Y Ma
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
| | - Anthony T C Chan
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
See A, Chu C, Kiong KL, Teo C, Tan HK, Wong EWY, Chan JYK, Tsang RKY, Chan J, Chang KP, Chien CY, Hao SP, Chen M, Lim CM. Surgical salvage of recurrent nasopharyngeal cancer- a multi-institutional review. Oral Oncol 2021; 122:105556. [PMID: 34688054 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Revised: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Anna See
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Surgery Academic Clinical Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Clarisse Chu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Kimberley L Kiong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Surgery Academic Clinical Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Constance Teo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Surgery Academic Clinical Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Hiang Khoon Tan
- Surgery Academic Clinical Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Eddy W Y Wong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, NT East, Hong Kong
| | - Jason Y K Chan
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, NT East, Hong Kong
| | - Raymond K Y Tsang
- Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Jimmy Chan
- Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Kai-Ping Chang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Yen Chien
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Sheng-Po Hao
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Mingyuan Chen
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chwee Ming Lim
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Surgery Academic Clinical Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hung HM, Chan OCM, Mak CH, Hung WM, Ng WT, Lee MCH. Dosimetric comparison of intensity modulated radiotherapy and intensity modulated proton therapy in the treatment of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Med Dosim 2021; 47:14-19. [PMID: 34470708 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2021.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Revised: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To compare the dosimetric performance of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) and Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) in terms of target volume coverage and sparing of neurological organs-at-risk (OARs) in salvaging recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rNPC). The maximum dose to the internal carotid artery (ICA) and nasopharyngeal (NP) mucosa, which are associated with potential carotid blowout and massive epistaxis, were also evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS IMRT and IMPT treatment plans were created for twenty patients with locally advanced rNPC. Planning Target Volume (PTV) was used to account for the setup and spatial error/uncertainty in the IMRT planning. Robust optimization on Clinical Target Volume (CTV) coverage with consideration of range and setup uncertainty was employed to produce two IMPT plans with 3-field and 4-field arrangements. The planning objective was to deliver 60 Gy to the PTV (IMRT) and CTV (IMPT) without exceeding the maximum lifetime cumulative Biologically Effective Dose (BED) of the neurological OARs (applied to the Planning organs-at-risk volume). The target dose coverage as well as the maximum dose to the neurological OARs, ICA, and NP mucosa were compared. RESULTS Compared with IMRT, 3-field IMPT achieved better coverage to GTV V100% (83.3% vs. 73.2%, P <0.01) and CTV V100% (80.5% vs. 72.4%, P <0.01), and lower maximum dose to the critical OARs including the spinal cord (19.2 Gy vs. 22.3 Gy, P <0.01), brainstem (30.0 Gy vs. 32.3 Gy, P <0.01) and optic chiasm (6.6 Gy vs. 9.8 Gy, P <0.01). The additional beam with the 4-fields IMPT plans further improved the target coverage from the 3-field IMPT (CTV V98%: 85.3% vs. 82.4%, P <0.01) with similar OAR sparing. However, the target dose was highly non-uniform with both IMPT plans, leading to a significantly higher maximum dose to the ICA (∼68 Gy vs. 62.6 Gy, P <0.01) and NP mucosa (∼72 Gy vs. 62.8 Gy, P <0.01) than IMRT. CONCLUSION IMPT demonstrated some dosimetric advantage over IMRT in treating rNPC. However, IMPT could also result in very high dose hot spots in the target volume. Careful consideration of the ICA and NP mucosal complications is recommended when applying IMPT on rNPC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hing Ming Hung
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong.
| | | | - Chi Hang Mak
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Wai Man Hung
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Wai Tong Ng
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Comprehensive Oncology Center, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Michael Chi Hang Lee
- Department of Medical Physics, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ng WT, Soong YL, Ahn YC, AlHussain H, Choi HCW, Corry J, Grégoire V, Harrington KJ, Hu CS, Jensen K, Kwong DL, Langendijk JA, Le QT, Lee NY, Lin JC, Lu TX, Mendenhall WM, O'Sullivan B, Ozyar E, Pan JJ, Peters LJ, Poh SS, Rosenthal DI, Sanguineti G, Tao Y, Wee JT, Yom SS, Chua MLK, Lee AWM. International Recommendations on Reirradiation by Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Locally Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:682-695. [PMID: 33571626 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.01.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Reirradiation for locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is challenging because prior radiation dose delivered in the first course is often close to the tolerance limit of surrounding normal structures. A delicate balance between achieving local salvage and minimizing treatment toxicities is needed. However, high-level evidence is lacking because available reports are mostly retrospective studies on small series of patients. Pragmatic consensus guidelines, based on an extensive literature search and the pooling of opinions by leading specialists, will provide a useful reference to assist decision-making for these difficult decisions. METHODS AND MATERIALS A thorough review of available literature on recurrent NPC was conducted. A set of questions and preliminary draft guideline was circulated to a panel of international specialists with extensive experience in this field for voting on controversial areas and comments. A refined second proposal, based on a summary of the initial voting and different opinions expressed, was recirculated to the whole panel for review and reconsideration. The current guideline was based on majority voting after repeated iteration for final agreement. RESULTS The initial round of questions showed variations in clinical practice even among the specialists, reflecting the lack of high-quality supporting data and the difficulties in formulating clinical decisions. Through exchange of comments and iterative revisions, recommendations with high-to-moderate agreement were formulated on general treatment strategies and details of reirradiation (including patient selection, targets contouring, dose prescription, and constraints). CONCLUSION This paper provides useful reference on radical salvage treatment strategies for recurrent NPC and optimization of reirradiation through review of published evidence and consensus building. However, the final decision by the attending clinician must include full consideration of an individual patient's condition, understanding of the delicate balance between risk and benefits, and acceptance of risk of complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wai Tong Ng
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Yoke Lim Soong
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Yong Chan Ahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hussain AlHussain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Horace C W Choi
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - June Corry
- Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vincent Grégoire
- Center for Molecular Imaging, Oncology, and Radiotherapy, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium, and Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Kevin J Harrington
- Royal Marsden/Institute of Cancer Research National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - Chao Su Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Kenneth Jensen
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Dora L Kwong
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong and Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Quynh Thu Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, NRG Oncology and HNCIG, Stanford, California
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York
| | - Jin Ching Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tai Xiang Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - William M Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Brian O'Sullivan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Enis Ozyar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Acibadem University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Jian Ji Pan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital and Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Lester J Peters
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sharon S Poh
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Giuseppe Sanguineti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Yungan Tao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Joseph T Wee
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Sue S Yom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Melvin L K Chua
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Anne W M Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Hospital and University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lin A, Chang JHC, Grover RS, Hoebers FJP, Parvathaneni U, Patel SH, Thariat J, Thomson DJ, Langendijk JA, Frank SJ. PTCOG Head and Neck Subcommittee Consensus Guidelines on Particle Therapy for the Management of Head and Neck Tumors. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:84-94. [PMID: 34285938 PMCID: PMC8270078 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00071.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Radiation therapy is a standard modality in the treatment for cancers of the head and neck, but is associated with significant short- and long-term side effects. Proton therapy, with its unique physical characteristics, can deliver less dose to normal tissues, resulting in fewer side effects. Proton therapy is currently being used for the treatment of head and neck cancer, with increasing clinical evidence supporting its use. However, barriers to wider adoption include access, cost, and the need for higher-level evidence. Methods The clinical evidence for the use of proton therapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer are reviewed here, including indications, advantages, and challenges. Results The Particle Therapy Cooperative Group Head and Neck Subcommittee task group provides consensus guidelines for the use of proton therapy for head and neck cancer. Conclusion This report can be used as a guide for clinical use, to understand clinical trials, and to inform future research efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ryan S Grover
- University of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Frank J P Hoebers
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Juliette Thariat
- Radiation Oncology Department, François Baclesse Center/ARCHADE, Normandy University, Caen, France
| | - David J Thomson
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Steven J Frank
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lee A, Kitpanit S, Chilov M, Langendijk JA, Lu J, Lee NY. A Systematic Review of Proton Therapy for the Management of Nasopharyngeal Cancer. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:119-130. [PMID: 34285941 PMCID: PMC8270076 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00082.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose With improved technology, more patients with nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) are receiving definitive treatment with proton therapy, which allows greater sparing of dose to normal tissues without compromising efficacy. As there is no randomized data, the purpose of this study was to systematically review the available literature on proton therapy in this setting, focusing on the toxicity endpoints. Materials and Methods A systematic search using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines was conducted in 5 databases: PubMed, Embase, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. A total of 491 studies were found on the topic of NPC and proton therapy. Following independent study selection by 2 investigators, 9 studies were found to have sufficient focus and relevance to be incorporated into the systematic review. Results All 9 studies were retrospective and examined only NPC patients except for one that also included paranasal sinus cancer. One study was a reirradiation study. Four studies used 3D or double scatter technique, while all others used intensity-modulated proton therapy. Oncologic outcomes were similar to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) rates, with 2-year local and regional progression-free survival (LRFS) ranging from 84% to 100%, 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) ranging from 75% to 88.9%, and 2-year overall survival (OS) ranging from 88% to 95% in the up-front setting. Four comparison studies with IMRT found significantly lower feeding tube rates (20% versus 65%, P = .015; and 14% versus 85%, P < .001) with proton therapy as well as lower mucositis (G2 46% versus 70%, P = .019; and G3 11% versus 76%, P = .0002). All other acute and late effects were largely improved with proton therapy but not statistically significant. Conclusions NPC patients receiving proton therapy maintain good outcomes with improved toxicity profile, likely due to sparing of dose to normal structures. Prospective studies are ongoing to better quantify the magnitude.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sarin Kitpanit
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Marina Chilov
- Medical Library, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jiade Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai Cancer Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gamez ME, Patel SH, McGee LA, Sio TT, McDonald M, Phan J, Ma DJ, Foote RL, Rwigema JCM. A Systematic Review on Re-irradiation with Charged Particle Beam Therapy in the Management of Locally Recurrent Skull Base and Head and Neck Tumors. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:131-154. [PMID: 34285942 PMCID: PMC8270105 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00064.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the clinical outcomes and treatment related toxicities of charged particle-based re-irradiation (reRT; protons and carbon ions) for the definitive management of recurrent or second primary skull base and head and neck tumors. Materials and Methods The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were applied for the conduct of this systematic review. Published work in English language evaluating the role of definitive charged particle therapies in the clinical setting of reRT for recurrent or second primary skull base and head and neck tumors were eligible for this analysis. Results A total of 26 original studies (15 protons, 10 carbon ions, and 1 helium/neon studies) involving a total of 1,118 patients (437 with protons, 670 with carbon ions, and 11 with helium/neon) treated with curative-intent charged particle reRT were included in this systematic review. All studies were retrospective in nature, and the majority of them (n=23, 88 %) were reported as single institution experiences (87% for protons, and 90% for carbon ion-based studies). The median proton therapy reRT dose was 64.5 Gy (RBE 1.1) (range, 50.0 – 75.6 Gy ), while the median carbon ion reRT dose was 53.8 Gy (RBE 2.5 – 3.0) (range, 44.8 – 60 Gy ). Induction and/or concurrent chemotherapy was administered to 232 (53%) of the patients that received a course of proton reRT, and 122 (18%) for carbon ion reRT patients. ReRT with protons achieved 2-year local control rates ranging from 50% to 86%, and 41% to 92% for carbon ion reRT. The 2-year overall survival rates for proton and carbon ion reRT ranged from 33% to 80%, and 50% to 86% respectively. Late ≥ G3 toxicities ranged from 0% to 37%, with brain necrosis, ototoxicity, visual deficits, and bleeding as the most common complications. Grade 5 toxicities for all treated patients occurred in 1.4% (n= 16/1118) with fatal bleeding as the leading cause. Conclusions Based on current data, curative intent skull base and head and neck reRT with charged particle radiotherapy is feasible and safe in well-selected cases, associated with comparable or potentially improved local control and toxicity rates compared to historical reRT studies using photon radiotherapy. Prospective multi-institutional studies reporting oncologic outcomes, toxicity, and dosimetric treatment planning data are warranted to further validate these findings and to improve the understanding of the clinical benefits of charged particle radiotherapy in the reRT setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauricio E Gamez
- Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University - The James Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Lisa A McGee
- Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Mark McDonald
- Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Daniel J Ma
- Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Li X, Kitpanit S, Lee A, Mah D, Sine K, Sherman EJ, Dunn LA, Michel LS, Fetten J, Zakeri K, Yu Y, Chen L, Kang JJ, Gelblum DY, McBride SM, Tsai CJ, Riaz N, Lee NY. Toxicity Profiles and Survival Outcomes Among Patients With Nonmetastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated With Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy vs Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2113205. [PMID: 34143193 PMCID: PMC8214161 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Patients with nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) are primarily treated by radiotherapy with curative intent with or without chemotherapy and often experience substantial treatment-related toxic effects even with modern radiation techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) may improve the toxicity profile; however, there is a paucity of data given the limited availability of IMPT in regions with endemic NPC. OBJECTIVE To compare toxic effects and oncologic outcomes among patients with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic NPC when treated with IMPT vs IMRT with or without chemotherapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective cohort study included 77 patients with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic NPC who received curative-intent radiotherapy with IMPT or IMRT at a tertiary academic cancer center from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019. Forty-eight patients with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive tumors were included in a 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis for survival outcomes. The end of the follow-up period was March 31, 2021. EXPOSURES IMPT vs IMRT with or without chemotherapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The main outcomes were the incidence of acute and chronic treatment-related adverse events (AEs) and oncologic outcomes, including locoregional failure-free survival (LRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS We identified 77 patients (25 [32.5%] women; 52 [67.5%] men; median [interquartile range] age, 48.7 [42.2-60.3] years), among whom 28 (36.4%) were treated with IMPT and 49 (63.6%) were treated with IMRT. Median (interquartile range) follow-up was 30.3 (17.9-41.5) months. On multivariable logistic regression analyses, IMPT was associated with lower likelihood of developing grade 2 or higher acute AEs compared with IMRT (odds ratio [OR], 0.15; 95% CI, 0.03-0.60; P = .01). Only 1 case (3.8%) of a chronic grade 3 or higher AE occurred in the IMPT group compared with 8 cases (16.3%) in the IMRT group (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.01-1.21; P = .15). Propensity score matching generated a balanced cohort of 48 patients (24 IMPT vs 24 IMRT) and found similar PFS in the IMPT and IMRT groups (2-year PFS, 95.7% [95% CI, 87.7%-100%] vs 76.7% [95% CI, 60.7%-97.0%]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.31; 95% CI, 0.07-1.47; P = .14). No locoregional recurrence or death was observed in the IMPT group from the matched cohort. Two-year LRFS was 100% (95% CI, 100%-100%) in the IMPT group and 86.2% (95% CI, 72.8%-100%) in the IMRT group (P = .08). Three-year OS was 100% (95% CI, 100%-100%) in the IMPT group and 94.1% (95% CI, 83.6%-100%) in the IMRT group (P = .42). Smoking history was the only clinical factor significantly associated with both poor LRFS (HR, 63.37; 95% CI, 3.25-1236.13; P = .006) and poor PFS (HR, 6.33; 95% CI, 1.16-34.57; P = .03) on multivariable analyses. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, curative-intent radiotherapy with IMPT for nonmetastatic NPC was associated with significantly reduced acute toxicity burden in comparison with IMRT, with rare late complications and excellent oncologic outcomes, including 100% locoregional control at 2 years. Prospective trials are warranted to direct the optimal patient selection for IMPT as the primary radiotherapy modality for nonmetastatic NPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xingzhe Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sarin Kitpanit
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Anna Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Dennis Mah
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, NJ
| | - Kevin Sine
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, NJ
| | - Eric J. Sherman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lara A. Dunn
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Loren S. Michel
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - James Fetten
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yao Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Linda Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jung Julie Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daphna Y. Gelblum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sean M. McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Chiaojung J. Tsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nadeem Riaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nancy Y. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Poh SS, Soong YL, Sommat K, Lim CM, Fong KW, Tan TW, Chua ML, Wang FQ, Hu J, Wee JT. Retreatment in locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Current status and perspectives. Cancer Commun (Lond) 2021; 41:361-370. [PMID: 33955719 PMCID: PMC8118589 DOI: 10.1002/cac2.12159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Revised: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon Shuxian Poh
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, 169610.,Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, 169857
| | - Yoke Lim Soong
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, 169610.,Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, 169857
| | - Kiattisa Sommat
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, 169610.,Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, 169857
| | - Chwee Ming Lim
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, 169608.,Surgery Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, 169857
| | - Kam Weng Fong
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, 169610.,Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, 169857
| | - Terence Wk Tan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, 169610.,Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, 169857
| | - Melvin Lk Chua
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, 169610.,Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, 169857
| | - Fu Qiang Wang
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, 169610.,Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, 169857
| | - Jing Hu
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, 169610.,Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, 169857
| | - Joseph Ts Wee
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, 169610.,Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, 169857
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Nam H, Ahn YC, Yang K, Oh D, Noh JM. Re-irradiation with Moderate Hypo-Fractionation Using Intensity Modulated Photon or Proton Radiation Therapy in Locally Recurrent Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Nasopharynx. Cancer Res Treat 2021; 54:96-108. [PMID: 33781049 PMCID: PMC8756131 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2020.1349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to analyze the treatment outcomes of locally recurrent nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) patients following moderate hypo-fractionation re-irradiation (re-RT). Materials and Methods Sixty locally recurrent NPC patients underwent hypo-fractionation re-RT. 48.3% had rT3-4, and 30.0% did keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), with or without intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), was used in 66.7% of patients. Results With the median follow up of 22 (2~254) months, 31 patients (51.7%) died, 38 (63.3%) developed further treatment failure, and 30 (50.0%) developed ≥Grade 3 toxicity (including seven Grade 5) at time of analysis. The 2- and 5-year rates of overall survival, local failure-free survival, and ≥Grade 3 toxicity-free survival were 57.9% and 45.8%, 64.1% and 52.5%, and 54.8% and 44.9%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, worse factors for OS were iT3-4 (p=0.010) and age at re-RT ≥53 years (p=0.003), those for LFFS were rT3-4 (p=0.022) and rN0-1 (p=0.035), and those for TFS were iT3-4 (p=0.020) and rIMRT/IMPT (p=0.030), respectively. Cumulative dose or fraction size ≥3 Gy at re-RT, however, showed no significance for OS, LFFS and TFS. Conclusion Current re-RT with modern RT techniques by moderate hypo-fractionation scheme seemed feasible in treating locally recurrent NPC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heerim Nam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Chan Ahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyungmi Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dongryul Oh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Myoung Noh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Svajdova M, Sicak M, Dubinsky P, Slavik M, Slampa P, Kazda T. Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Cancer: Critical Review of Local Treatment Options Including Recommendations during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12123510. [PMID: 33255751 PMCID: PMC7760235 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12123510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Revised: 11/22/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Options for the curative treatment of locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma include surgery or re-irradiation. Both approaches have been scientifically explored, yet there is no consensus on the indication or definitive preference of the above two salvage treatments. The aim of this review is to summarize the current evidence on the local treatment of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The feasibility, safety, and efficacy of salvage surgery and radical re-irradiation are discussed. Recommendations on treatment modifications during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic are included as well. Abstract Recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma represents an extremely challenging therapeutic situation. Given the vulnerability of the already pretreated neurological structures surrounding the nasopharynx, any potential salvage retreatment option bears a significant risk of severe complications that result in high treatment-related morbidity, quality of life deterioration, and even mortality. Yet, with careful patient selection, long-term survival may be achieved after local retreatment in a subgroup of patients with local or regional relapse of nasopharyngeal cancer. Early detection of the recurrence represents the key to therapeutic success, and in the case of early stage disease, several curative treatment options can be offered to the patient, albeit with minimal support in prospective clinical data. In this article, an up-to-date review of published evidence on modern surgical and radiation therapy treatment options is summarized, including currently recommended treatment modifications of both therapeutic approaches during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michaela Svajdova
- Department of Radiation and Clinical Oncology, Central Military Hospital—Teaching Hospital Ruzomberok, 034 01 Ruzomberok, Slovakia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +421-911-618-265
| | - Marian Sicak
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Central Military Hospital—Teaching Hospital, 034 01 Ruzomberok, Slovakia;
| | - Pavol Dubinsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, East Slovakia Oncology Institute, 041 91 Kosice, Slovakia;
- Faculty of Health, Catholic University Ruzomberok, 034 01 Ruzomberok, Slovakia
| | - Marek Slavik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, 656 53 Brno, Czech Republic; (P.S.); (T.K.)
| | - Pavel Slampa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, 656 53 Brno, Czech Republic; (P.S.); (T.K.)
| | - Tomas Kazda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, 656 53 Brno, Czech Republic; (P.S.); (T.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
Proton therapy has recently gained substantial momentum worldwide due to improved accessibility to the technology and sustained interests in its advantage of better tissue sparing compared to traditional photon radiation. Proton therapy in head and neck cancer has a unique advantage given the complex anatomy and proximity of targets to vital organs. As head and neck cancer patients are living longer due to epidemiological shifts and advances in treatment options, long-term toxicity from radiation treatment has become a major concern that may be better mitigated by proton therapy. With increased utilization of proton therapy, new proton centers breaking ground, and as excitement about the technology continue to increase, we aim to comprehensively review the evidence of proton therapy in major subsites within the head and neck, hoping to facilitate a greater understanding of the full risks and benefits of proton therapy for head and neck cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xingzhe Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Anna Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Marc A Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Eric J Sherman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hu J, Huang Q, Gao J, Guan X, Hu W, Yang J, Qiu X, Chen M, Kong L, Lu JJ. Clinical outcomes of carbon-ion radiotherapy for patients with locoregionally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer 2020; 126:5173-5183. [PMID: 32931035 PMCID: PMC7693227 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2020] [Revised: 06/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reirradiation for locoregionally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LR-NPC) after high-dose radiotherapy (RT) is challenging and usually is associated with poor survival and severe toxicities. Because of its physical and biological advantages over photon-beam RT, carbon-ion RT (CIRT) could be a potential treatment option for patients with LR-NPC. METHODS Patients with LR-NPC who underwent salvage therapy using CIRT at the Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center between May 2015 and June 2019 were analyzed. CIRT doses were 50 to 69 gray equivalent (GyE) (2.0-3.0 GyE per fraction). Overall survival (OS), local control, regional control, distant control, and acute and late toxicities were analyzed. Univariable and multivariable analyses of OS and local control were performed using the Cox regression model. RESULTS Among the 206 patients included, 139 patients (67.5%) had recurrent American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III or stage IV disease. With a median follow-up of 22.8 months, the 2-year OS, local control, regional control, and distant control rates were 83.7%, 58.0%, 87.3%, and 94.7%, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that older age (P = .017) was predictive of worse OS, whereas a larger tumor volume (P = .049) and a lower biological equivalent dose (P = .029) were associated with inferior local control. No patient developed an acute toxicity of ≥grade 3 during CIRT. Severe (≥grade 3) late toxicities included temporal lobe necrosis (0.97%), cranial neuropathy (0.49%), hearing loss (1.46%), xerostomia (0.49%), and mucosal necrosis (16.02%) (toxicities were graded using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria). CONCLUSIONS Salvage treatment using CIRT is efficacious for patients with LR-NPC and its toxicities are acceptable. CIRT may improve the survival and toxicity profiles substantially for patients with LR-NPC compared with the reported results after photon-based intensity-modulated RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiyi Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
| | - Qingting Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
| | - Jing Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiyin Guan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
| | - Weixu Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
| | - Jing Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
| | - Xianxin Qiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
| | - Mingyuan Chen
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong, China
| | - Lin Kong
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiade J Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Saini G, Shukla R, Sood KS, Shukla SK, Chandra R. Role of Proton Beam Therapy in Current Day Radiation Oncology Practice. Asian Journal of Oncology 2020. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractProton beam therapy (PBT), because of its unique physics of no–exit dose deposition in the tissue, is an exciting prospect. The phenomenon of Bragg peak allows protons to deposit their almost entire energy towards the end of the path of the proton and stops any further dose delivery. Braggs peak equips PBT with superior dosimetric advantage over photons or electrons because PBT doesn’t traverse the target/body but is stopped sharply at an energy dependent depth in the target/body. It also has no exit dose. Because of no exit dose and normal tissue sparing, PBT is hailed for its potential to bring superior outcomes. Pediatric malignancies is the most common malignancy where PBT have found utmost application. Nowadays, PBT is also being used in the treatment of other malignancies such as carcinoma prostate, carcinoma breast, head and neck malignancies, and gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. Despite advantages of PBT, there is not only a high cost of setting up of PBT centers but also a lack of definitive phase-III data. Therefore, we review the role of PBT in current day practice of oncology to bring out the nuances that must guide the practice to choose suitable patients for PBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gagan Saini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MAX Super Speciality Hospital Patparganj and Vaishali, New Delhi, India
| | - Rashmi Shukla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MAX Super Speciality Hospital Patparganj and Vaishali, New Delhi, India
| | - Kanika S. Sood
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dharamshila Narayana Superspeciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Sujit K. Shukla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vardhaman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Ritu Chandra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MAX Super Speciality Hospital Patparganj and Vaishali, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Tsang RK. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma - Improving cure with technology and clinical trials. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020; 6:1-3. [PMID: 32426697 PMCID: PMC7221204 DOI: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2020.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond K Tsang
- Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|