Survival of patients with multiple primary malignancies: a study of 783 patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Characteristics of gastrointestinal stromal tumors associated to other tumors: Características de los tumores del estroma gastrointestinal asociados a otras neoplasias

INTRODUCTION

Our aim is to analyze the differences between sporadic gastrointestinal stromal tumors and those associated with other tumors.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study including patients with diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors operated at our center. Patients were divided into two groups, according to whether or not they had associated other tumors, both synchronously and metachronously. Disease free survival and overall survival were calculated for both groups.

RESULTS

96 patients were included, 60 (62.5%) were male, with a median age of 66.8 (35-84). An association with other tumors was found in 33 cases (34.3%); 12 were synchronous (36.3%) and 21 metachronous (63.7%). The presence of mutations in associated tumors was 70% and in non-associated tumors 75%. Associated tumors were classified as low risk tumors based on Fletcher's stratification scale (p = 0.001) as they usually were smaller in size and had less than ≤5 mitosis per 50 HPF compared to non-associated tumors. When analyzing overall survival, there were statistically significant differences (p = 0,035) between both groups.

CONCLUSION

The relatively high proportion of gastrointestinal stromal tumors cases with associated tumors suggests the need to carry out a study to rule out presence of a second neoplasm and a long-term follow-up should be carried out in order to diagnose a possible second neoplasm. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors associated with other tumors have usually low risk of recurrence with a good long-term prognosis.

Genomic alterations in oral multiple primary cancers

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the predominant type of oral cancer, while some patients may develop oral multiple primary cancers (MPCs) with unclear etiology. This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and genomic alterations of oral MPCs. Clinicopathological data from patients with oral single primary carcinoma (SPC, n = 202) and oral MPCs (n = 34) were collected and compared. Copy number alteration (CNA) analysis was conducted to identify chromosomal-instability differences among oral MPCs, recurrent OSCC cases, and OSCC patients with lymph node metastasis. Whole-exome sequencing was employed to identify potential unique gene mutations in oral MPCs patients. Additionally, CNA and phylogenetic tree analyses were used to gain preliminary insights into the molecular characteristics of different primary tumors within individual patients. Our findings revealed that, in contrast to oral SPC, females predominated the oral MPCs (70.59%), while smoking and alcohol use were not frequent in MPCs. Moreover, long-term survival outcomes were poorer in oral MPCs. From a CNA perspective, no significant differences were observed between oral MPCs patients and those with recurrence and lymph node metastasis. In addition to commonly mutated genes such as CASP8, TP53 and MUC16, in oral MPCs we also detected relatively rare mutations, such as HS3ST6 and RFPL4A. Furthermore, this study also demonstrated that most MPCs patients exhibited similarities in certain genomic regions within individuals, and distinct differences of the similarity degree were observed between synchronous and metachronous oral MPCs.

An entity that should be kept in mind: Synchronous gastrointestinal stromal tumor encountered in resection materials obtained for the detection of intra-abdominal malignancies

OBJECTIVE

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), often sporadic, arise from interstitial Cajal cells of the gastrointestinal tract or their stem cell-like precursors. Apart from tumor-associated syndromes, it has been reported that GISTs are also associated with other tumors. There is no clear information about the etiology of these synchronous tumors. In this study, we wanted to present the clinicopathological features of 13 cases diagnosed as synchronous GIST with other tumors.

METHODS

Demographic characteristics of the cases, risk of progressive disease score, tumor localization, size, and the mitotic activity of tumors along with survival status were evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirteen of 101 cases diagnosed with GIST had a primary tumor synchronous with GIST. Synchronous GISTs were located in the stomach and small intestine. Most of the cases were detected incidentally in the intraoperative and post-operative periods. Risk scores for progressive disease were categorized as low (n=1), very low (n=1), and no risk (n=11). Non-GIST tumors were located in the stomach, transverse colon, left colon, rectum, gallbladder, kidney, and retroperitoneal space. Histological tumor types were adenocarcinoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, mesothelioma, and neuroendocrine tumor. Life expectancy was found to be significantly lower in synchronous GISTs.

CONCLUSION

In cases operated for non-GIST tumors, the possibility of incidental detection of GIST should always be kept in mind.

The association of genitourinary cancer among Saudi patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors and a systematic literature review

The gastrointestinal tract's most commonly occurring primary mesenchymal tumor is the gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). However, few cases worldwide were reported associated with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Therefore, we aimed to identify the association of genitourinary tumors in patients with GIST in our tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia and compare it to the literature. We identified all patients in the pathology department database with the diagnosis of GIST. We excluded duplicate and recurrent cases. We examined patients' files for the presence of RCC, adrenal tumors, or other genitourinary cancer. A systematic review of the association was conducted. From 2003 to 2020, 170 patients had a histopathologic diagnosis of primary GIST, 100 men and 70 women, median age of 57 (range 9-91) years at the time of diagnosis. The site of primary GIST was gastric 103, small bowel 43, mesenteric 5, omentum/peritoneum 7, abdomen 4, isolated adrenal 1, and other 7. Six patients had associated primary genitourinary cancer. Three patients had RCC (two clear cell RCC and one radiologic diagnosis only), and three had adrenal tumors (one adrenal carcinoma, one an isolated adrenal GIST, and one pheochromocytoma). In addition, two patients had a tumor invading the urinary bladder. Although the cohort included 63 men aged 60 or above (median 71 ± 8.7 years, range 60-94), none demonstrated clinical prostatic carcinoma. Data was compared to 69 systematic review articles. We report the rare association between GIST tumors and primary genitourinary cancer, mainly RCC and adrenal tumors. Also, we identified a secondary invasion of the urinary bladder. Unlike the reported series, none of the older male patients had clinical prostate cancer.

Triple Primary Malignancies: Tumor Associations, Survival, and Clinicopathological Analysis: A 25-Year Single-Institution Experience

The detection of multiple primary malignancies is on the rise despite their rare occurrence rate. This research aims to determine the prevalence, tumor association patterns, overall survival, and the correlation between survival time and independent factors in patients with triple primary malignancies. This single-center retrospective study included 117 patients with triple primary malignancies admitted to a tertiary cancer center between 1996 and 2021. The observed prevalence was 0.082%. The majority of patients (73%) were over the age of fifty at the first tumor diagnosis, and regardless of gender, the lowest median age occurred in the metachronous group. The most common tumor associations were found between genital-skin-breast, skin-skin-skin, digestive-genital-breast, and genital-breast-lung cancer. The male gender and being over the age of fifty at the first tumor diagnosis are associated with a higher risk of mortality. Compared with the metachronous group, patients with three synchronous tumors demonstrate a risk of mortality 6.5 times higher, whereas patients with one metachronous and two synchronous tumors demonstrate a risk of mortality three times higher. The likelihood of subsequent malignancies should always be considered throughout cancer patients' short- and long-term surveillance to ensure prompt tumor diagnosis and treatment.

Primary extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumor of retroperitoneum: Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of six cases

Aim

This study investigates the clinicopathological features and prognostic genic biomarker factors of primary retroperitoneal extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors (EGISTs).

Methods

The clinicopathological data of six patients with primary retroperitoneal EGIST were analyzed, including cell type (epithelioid or spindle), mitoses, and the presence of intratumoral necrosis and hemorrhage. Mitoses were counted and summed from 50 high power fields (HPFs). Mutations of exons 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 17 of the C-kit genes and those of exons 12 and 18 of the PDGFRA gene were examined. Follow-up was performed via telephone, and all outpatient records were reviewed. The last follow-up date was February 2022, the median follow-up was 27.5m and the postoperative status, medication, and survival of the patients were recorded.

Result

The patients were treated with radical intent. Four cases (patients 3, 4, 5, and 6) underwent multivisceral resection for encroachment on the adjacent viscera. The postoperative pathological results demonstrated that all biopsy specimens were negative for S-100 and desmin, and positive for DOG1 and CD117. Additionally, four patients (case 1, 2, 4, and 5) were positive for CD34, four (case 1, 3, 5, and 6) were positive for SMA, four (case 1, 4, 5, and 6) had >5/50 HPFs, and three (case 1, 4, and 5) had Ki67 >5%. According to the modified National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines, all patients were graded as high-risk cases. By exome sequencing, exon11 mutations were detected in the six patients, while exon10 mutations were detected in two cases (patients 4 and 5). The median follow-up time was 30.5 (11-109) months, with only one fatality at 11 months.

Conclusion

Retroperitoneal EGIST is a rare mesenchymal tumor that is difficult to distinguish from other retroperitoneal tumors. To diagnose this highly malignant tumor, low-threshold suspicion is necessary, and Kit and PDGFRA gene mutations should be routinely tested to confirm the diagnosis and guide subsequent treatment.

Prognostic Nomogram for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors after Surgery Based on the SEER Database

We aimed to determine prognostic factors and develop an effective and practical nomogram for predicting cancer-specific survival in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients. Postoperative data were obtained from the SEER database (2000-2018). Patients were divided into training and validation cohorts at random (7 : 3). Prognostic factors were screened, and a prognostic nomogram was established using log-rank testing and Cox regression. We used DCA, ROC curves, C-index, and calibration curves to evaluate our model's predictive performance. The clinical value of the nomogram and the modified National Institute of Health (M-NIH) classification were compared using the NRI and IDI. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied to examine survival by risk group, and log-rank tests were applied to compare variations in survival curves. Independent prognostic risk factors associated with cancer-specific survival on multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were age, race, and tumor location, size, grade, and stage. Clinically relevant variables need to be considered in addition to statistically significant variables when developing prognostic models to aid clinical decision-making. We included two additional variables (mitotic rate and chemotherapy) when constructing the prognostic model. The C-index was 0.766 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.737-0.794) in the training cohort and 0.795 (95% CI: 0.754-0.836) in the internal validation group suggesting robustness. The areas under the ROC curve for three-year and five-year survival were >0.700, indicating satisfactory discrimination. The calibration curves showed good agreement between the predictions of the nomogram and the actual results. The NRI (0.346 for 3-year and 0.265 for 5-year cancer-specific survival for patients with GIST (GSS) prediction; validation cohort: 0.356 for 3-year and 0.246 for 5-year GSS prediction) and IDI values (0.047 for 3-year and 0.060 for 5-year GSS prediction; validation cohort: 0.071 for 3-year and 0.084 for 5-year GSS prediction) suggested that the established nomogram performed significantly better than the M-NIH classification. The DCA indicated that the nomogram was clinically useful and had a high discriminative ability in identifying patients who were at high risk of poor outcomes. According to nomogram findings, patients were divided into three groups (high, moderate, and low risk), with significantly different prognoses in both cohorts. Our nomogram satisfactorily predicted survival in postsurgical GIST patients, which may assist clinicians to evaluate the postoperative status and guide subsequent treatments.

Primary pulmonary T-cell lymphoma after operation for small intestinal stromal tumor: A case report

Background

The risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in combination with other primary malignancies is high, which occurs before and after the diagnosis of GIST. Primary pulmonary T-cell lymphoma is a rare type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Case presentation

We report a 53-year-old male patient who was admitted to our hospital with fever, cough, and expectoration for 2 weeks. Chest computed tomography (CT) showed a cavitary mass in the left lower lobe with multiple nodules in the upper lobes of both lungs. The patient had a history of surgery for small intestinal stromal tumors and was treated with oral imatinib after surgery. Lung biopsy was diagnosed as lymphomatoid granulomatosis, tending to grade 3. The pathological diagnosis was corrected by surgery and genetic testing for lung non-Hodgkin CD8-positive cytotoxic T-cell lymphoma with Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection in some cells. After multiple chemotherapies, the CT scan showed a better improvement than before. The patient is still under follow-up, and no tumor recurrence has been found.

Conclusion

Patients with a history of GIST should be monitored for other malignancies. The clinical symptoms and imaging examinations of primary pulmonary T-cell lymphoma are not characteristic, and the definite diagnosis still depends on pathological examination. The patient was treated with the CHOP chemotherapy regimen after the operation, the curative effect was good.

Co-Localization of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) and Peritoneal Mesothelioma: A Case Series

PURPOSE

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is associated with increased risk of additional cancers. In this study, synchronous GIST, and peritoneal mesothelioma (PM) were characterized to evaluate the relationship between these two cancers.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients diagnosed with both GIST and PM between July 2010 and June 2021. Patient demographics, past tumor history, intraoperative reports, cross-sectional imaging, peritoneal cancer index (PCI) scoring, somatic next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis, and histology were reviewed.

RESULTS

Of 137 patients who underwent primary GIST resection from July 2010 to June 2021, 8 (5.8%) were found to have synchronous PM, and 4 patients (50%) had additional cancers and/or benign tumors. Five (62.5%) were male, and the median age at GIST diagnosis was 57 years (range: 45-76). Seventy-five percent of GISTs originated from the stomach. Of the eight patients, one patient had synchronous malignant mesothelioma (MM), and the remaining had well-differentiated papillary mesothelioma (WDPM), which were primarily located in the region of the primary GIST (89%). The median PCI score was 2 in the WDPM patients. NGS of GIST revealed oncogenic KIT exon 11 (62.5%), PDGFRA D842V (25%), or SDH (12.5%) mutations, while NGS of the MM revealed BAP1 and PBRM1 alterations.

CONCLUSIONS

One in 17 GIST patients undergoing resection in this series have PM, which is significantly higher than expected if these two diseases were considered as independent events. Our results indicate that synchronous co-occurrence of GIST and PM is an underrecognized finding, suggesting a possible relationship that deserves further investigation.

Survival Analysis in Patients with Lung Cancer and Subsequent Primary Cancer: A Nationwide Cancer Registry Study

With improved survival in patients with cancer, the risk of developing multiple primary malignancies (MPMs) has increased. We aimed to characterize MPMs involving lung cancer and compare these characteristics between patients with single lung cancer and those with lung cancer and subsequent primary cancer (known as lung cancer first [LCF]). Methods: This retrospective study was conducted based on Taiwan Cancer Database from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Registry Database. Patients with lung cancer (n = 72,219) from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2015, were included in this study, and their medical records were traced back to 1 January 2002, and followed until 31 December 2019. Results: MPMs occurred in 10,577 (14.65%) patients with lung cancer, and LCF and other cancer first (OCF) accounted for 35.55% and 64.45% of these patients, with a mean age at lung cancer diagnosis of 65.18 and 68.92 years, respectively. The median interval between primary malignancies in the OCF group was significantly longer than that in the LCF group (3.26 vs. 0.11 years, p < 0.001). Patients in the single lung cancer group were significantly older than those in the LCF group (67.12 vs. 65.18 years, p < 0.001). The mean survival time of patients with LCF was longer than that of patients with single lung cancer. Following initial lung cancer, the three most common second primary malignancies were lung, colon, and breast cancers. For patients with advanced lung cancer, survival in patients with mutant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) was longer than that in patients with undetected EGFR. In stage 3 and 4 patients with EGFR mutations, the LCF group showed better survival than the single lung cancer group. Conversely, in stage 1 patients with mutant EGFR, the LCF group exhibited worse survival than the single lung cancer group. Conclusions: Survival in patients with MPMs depends on baseline characteristics and treatments. Our findings may contribute to the development of precision medicine for improving personalized treatment and survival as well as the reduction of medical costs.

Complete Response of High Microsatellite Instability Gastric Cancer and Synchronous Microsatellite Stability Rectal Cancer

Gastric cancer, a leading cause of cancer-related death in the world, may occur with an additional synchronous malignancy in rare cases. Of these rare cases many are colorectal cancer. Microsatellite instability is a phenomenon that may contribute to the pathogenesis of both cancers, as are field cancerization and genetic susceptibility, although none of these explain many concurrent cases. In this case, we described a patient with locally advanced microsatellite instability-high gastric cancer and synchronous microsatellite stable rectal cancer, who received a combination chemo-immunotherapy regimen and achieved complete response. This report reflects on current knowledge surrounding synchronous primary malignancies and achieving complete response.

Effect of prior malignancy on the prognosis of gastric cancer and somatic mutation

BACKGROUND

Cancer survivors have a higher risk of developing secondary cancer, with previous studies showing heterogeneous effects of prior cancer on cancer survivors.

AIM

To describe the features and clinical significance of a prior malignancy in patients with gastric cancer (GC).

METHODS

We identified eligible patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, and compared the clinical features of GC patients with/without prior cancer. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox analyses were used to assess the prognostic impact of prior cancer on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) outcomes. We also validated our results in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort and compared mutation patterns.

RESULTS

In the SEER dataset, of the 35492 patients newly diagnosed with GC between 2004 and 2011, 4,001 (11.3%) had at least one prior cancer, including 576 (1.62%) patients with multiple cancers. Patients with a prior cancer history tended to be elderly, with a more localized stage and less positive lymph nodes. The prostate (32%) was the most common initial cancer site. The median interval from initial cancer diagnosis to secondary GC was 68 mo. By using multivariable Cox analyses, we found that a prior cancer history was not significantly associated with OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97–1.05). However, a prior cancer history was significantly associated with better GC-specific survival (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.78–0.85). In TCGA cohort, no significant difference in OS was observed for GC patients with or without prior cancer. Also, no significant differences in somatic mutations were observed between groups.

CONCLUSION

The prognosis of GC patients with previous diagnosis of cancer was not inferior to that of primary GC patients.

Multiple primary gastrointestinal tumors of gastric, pancreatic and rectal origin; a case report

Introduction

The occurrence of multiple primary synchronous or metachronous malignancies is a described phenomenon. Such cases may have genetic predisposition or could be related to environmental risk factors but may also be sporadic. We are reporting a unique combination of triple primary synchronous malignancies in the same patient.

Case presentation

A 71 year old man presented with constipation and per rectal bleeding with a palpable mass 5–6 cm from the anal verge on physical examination. Colonoscopy with biopsy confirmed adenocarcinoma of rectal origin. After multi-disciplinary tumor board meeting, the patient received neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy followed by single-stage surgery. Re-staging work up showed the presence of pancreatic lesion. Incidental finding of a gastric nodule upon surgical exploration which was confirmed to be a gastrointestinal stromal tumor. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course.

Discussion

Multiple primary malignancies of the gastrointestinal system has previously been reported in the literature; whether in the form of double, triple, quadruple or even quintuple primaries. Furthermore, gastrointestinal malignancies have been reported to be combined with extra-intestinal malignancies. However, this unique combination of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, rectal adenocarcinoma and gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor has not been previously reported in the literature. Single-stage multiple resections was successful.

Conclusion

We are reporting a unique case of three primary malignancies involving the rectum, pancreas and stomach. For such patients, there is no clear guidelines regarding management or surveillance, but rather should be individualized.

•

Multiple primary malignancies is becoming an increasingly common phenomenon.

•

We are reporting a case of multiple primary malignancies involving 3 organs successfully managed by single-stage surgery.

•

No guidelines exist for the management of such cases, although multi-disciplinary team approach is of value.

The occurrence of gastrointestinal stromal tumors with second malignancies - Case series of a single institution experience

INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) may coexist with different types of malignancies, either synchronously or metachronously. The aim of this study was to characterize the clinical and histopathological features of GIST coexisting with other neoplasms.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 76 GISTs cases diagnosed at our institution between January 2003 and March 2020 was performed. A subgroup of cases with concomitant second malignancy was selected. The clinical and pathologic records were reviewed.

RESULTS

18 out of 76 patients (23.7%) with GISTs were diagnosed with the second neoplasms. In 11 cases GISTs were diagnosed metachronously to the second malignancy, whereas 7 cases of GIST were synchronous. The most common concomitant neoplasms were breast cancer and gastric cancer. The concomitant GIST were located mainly in small intestine (52.6%). 14 GISTs were classified as very low or low-risk (77.8%), 3 as moderate risk (16.7%) and 1 as high risk tumors (5.6%).

CONCLUSION

The coexistence of GIST with other malignancies may be more common, than it has been considered. As the most of concomitant GISTs occurs metachronously to the second malignancy, studying of this phenomenon requires a long-term follow-up.

Second Primary Tumors in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Single-Center Experience

Background and Objectives: In this study, we investigated the frequency and type of second primary malignant tumors (SPMTs) accompanying gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), patient and tumor characteristics, and follow-up and survival data. Materials and Methods: We included 20 patients with SPMTs from a total of 103 patients with GISTs in a single center in Turkey. At the time of GIST diagnosis, patient age, sex, presentation symptoms, localization, pathological features of the tumor, stage, recurrence risk scoring for localized disease, treatments received, time of SPMT association, follow-up times, and survival analysis were recorded for each patient. Localization, histopathology, and stage of SPMT accompanying GISTs were also recorded accordingly. Results: SPMT was detected in 19.4% of patients with GISTs. Of the patients, 50% were men and 50% were women. The mean age at the time of diagnosis of GIST was 63.8 ± 10.81 years (range: 39–77 years). Of the GISTs, 60% were localized in the stomach, 25% in the small intestine, and 70% were at low risk. Of the SPMTs, 60% were in the gastrointestinal system. SPMTs were diagnosed as synchronous with GISTs in 50% of the patients. The mean follow-up period of the patients from the diagnosis of GIST was 45.6 (0.43–129.6) months. When the data were finalized, 5% died due to GIST, 35% died due to SPMT, and 15% died due to non-disease-related causes. Conclusions: SPMT was detected in 19.4% of patients with GISTs. GISTs were frequently located in the stomach, and most of them were at low risk. The most common SPMTs were gastrointestinal system tumors, and their coexistence was found to be synchronous. Most patients died due to SPMT during follow-up.

Significance of Primary Malignant Tumors on the Outcome of Patients With Resected Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

AIM

This study aimed to clarify the significance of primary malignant tumors for the outcome of resected gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The medical history, pathological findings and prognosis of 66 patients with GISTs resected at our institute between January 2003 and December 2018 were investigated retrospectively and compared statistically.

RESULTS

Among 66 patients with GISTs, 24 (36%) had concomitant malignant tumors. In an average study period of 57 months, one patient died from GIST, seven from other malignant tumors, and one from another disease. Only coexistence of GIST and other malignant tumors was recognized as a prognostic factor. Increasing age was significantly correlated with other malignant tumor in combination with GIST. When comparing patients with GIST alone and GIST with other malignant tumors, the latter showed significantly poorer prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Coexistence of other malignant tumors was commonly observed in patients with GIST, and was associated with poorer prognosis. This association should be carefully considered and monitored in patients with GISTs.

The impact of a prior malignancy on outcomes in gastric cancer patients

Background

The number of cancer survivors has increased rapidly, and there is a higher risk of developing a second cancer. Whether a prior malignancy could affect survival outcomes is unknown. We aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and prognostic outcomes of prior malignancies in patients with gastric cancer.

Methods

Patient data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We used the Kaplan–Meier method, competing risk models, and Cox regression models to evaluate the impact of prior malignancy on survival outcomes.

Results

Among 71,809 patients with primary gastric cancer, 6667 (9.3%) patients had a pre‐existing cancer. Prostate (31.86%), breast (14.34%), and colon and rectum (10.32%) cancer were the most common types. A significant difference was observed in the overall survival rates between patients with and without prior cancer (log‐rank=139.73, p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, patients with prostate, uterine corpus, lung and bronchus, colon and rectum, esophagus, urinary bladder, leukemia, brain and other nervous system, oral cavity and pharynx, and breast cancer faced inferior survival than those without prior cancer.

Conclusions

A history of prior cancer was associated with worse overall survival in patients with gastric cancer, and the effects varied by different initial cancer types. The exclusion and inclusion of patients who had previous malignancies should be reconsidered according to the specific malignancy types.

Impact of prior cancer history on the survival of patients with larynx cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with a prior history of cancer are commonly excluded from clinical trial. Increasing number of studies implied that a prior cancer did not adversely affect the clinical outcome among various types of cancer patients. However, the impact of prior cancer on survival of larynx cancer patients remains largely unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of prior cancer and assess its impact on survival of patients diagnosed with larynx cancer.

METHODS

Patients with larynx cancer as the first or second primary malignancy diagnosed from 2004 to 2015 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to balance baseline characteristics. Kaplan-Meier method, multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, and multivariate competing risk model were performed for survival analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 24,812 eligible patients with larynx cancer were included in the study, wherein a total of 2436 patients (9.8%) had a prior history of cancer. Prostate (36%), lung and bronchus (10%), urinary bladder (7%), and breast (6%) were the most common types of prior cancer. A prior cancer history served as a risk factor for overall survival (AHR =1.30; 95% CI [1.21-1.41]; P < 0.001) but a protective factor for cancer-specific mortality (AHR = 0.83; 95% CI [0.72-0.94]; P = 0.004) in comparison with those without prior cancer. The subgroup analysis showed that a prior history of cancer adversely affected overall survival of patients with larynx cancer in most subgroups stratified by timing and types of prior cancer, as well as by different clinicopathologic features.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicated an adverse survival impact of a prior history of cancer on patients with larynx cancer. Except for a few particular prior cancer, clinical trials should be considered prudently for laryngeal cancer patients with prior cancers.

The effects of a prior malignancy on the survival of patients with ovarian cancer: a population-based study

Background: With the improvement in the prognostic outcomes of multiple malignancies, the population of cancer survivors is growing rapidly and is at higher risk of developing secondary ovarian cancer. However, the prevalence and clinical outcomes of prior cancer among newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients remain unknown. Methods: Patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer between 2004 and 2015 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether there was a prior malignancy. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to calculate all-cause and ovarian-specific survival. Furthermore, we conducted subgroup survival analyses of patients stratified by previous cancer site to explore the associations between prior cancer site and survival outcomes. Results: A total of 52,182 patients with primary ovarian cancer were identified, and 3.6% (n=1,860) had a documented prior malignancy. In multivariate analyses, patients with prior malignancies had a worse all-cause and ovarian cancer-specific prognosis than those without. In subset analyses, patients with a history of thyroid cancer had a better all-cause and ovarian cancer-specific prognosis, and patients with prior colorectal, urinary system, skin, lung, haematologic and stomach cancers were at risk of decreased survival compared to that of patients without a prior cancer. Conclusions: Prior malignancy has an adverse impact on the survival of patients with ovarian cancer, and the impact on prognostic outcomes varies by different prior cancer sites. The inconsistent survival effects of previous malignancies should be considered in clinical trial design and recruitment.

Prognosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Among Cancer Survivors with Other Types of Primary Tumors

BACKGROUND

The clinical characteristics and outcomes of secondary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cancer survivors with other prior malignancies remain poorly understood. We aimed to depict the features of HCC patients with other prior cancer and to examine the prognostic effect of prior cancer in those patients.

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with HCC between 2004 and 2014 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis were conducted to determine survival differences and impact of prior cancer history.

RESULTS

In total, 32,343 eligible patients with HCC were included in the current study, and 2830 (8.7%) of those patients had prior cancer. Patients who had prior cancer were older and more frequently at localized or regional stages of HCC compared to those without a history of cancer. No differences in overall or cancer-specific survival rates were observed among patients with or without prior cancer, as revealed by the Kaplan-Meier curves. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, a history of cancer was not a prognostic factor for worse overall (HR = 0.99, 95%CI 0.94-1.03, P = 0.577) or HCC-specific (HR = 1.01, 95%CI 0.96-1.06, P = 0.802) survival after adjustment for various covariates.

CONCLUSIONS

Subsequent HCC in cancer survivors has several different clinical characteristics compared with primary HCC. A history of prior cancer did not significantly contribute to a worse prognosis for subsequent HCC.

Association of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma with GIST-a Case Series

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) are the most common gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumours of the gastrointestinal tract. They are diagnosed by the expression of markers like CD 117, CD 34, DOG-1 and PDGFRA. The identification of these mutations has resulted in a better understanding of their oncogenic mechanisms. Few studies have shown the high incidence of a second malignancy including papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) in known patients of GIST. Literature review on pathogenesis of GIST and PTC showed that PTC targeting Protein Kinase C theta (PKCθ) plays role in both PTC and GIST. Further studies have also shown that, apart from somatic and familial gastrointestinal stromal tumours, PDGFRA is associated with many other malignancies including PTC. These studies explain the common genetic pathway involved in the development of GIST and PTC in same patient. In spite of common genetic association between GIST and other malignancies, none of the standard protocols recommends screening for second malignancy. In this article, we present the details of four patients who had associated GIST and PTC at the same time or developed during follow-up.

Long-term survival among patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors diagnosed after another malignancy: a SEER population-based study

Background

To explore overall survival (OS) and GISTs-specific survival (GSS) among cancer survivors developing a second primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).

Methods

We conducted a cohort study, where patients with GISTs after another malignancy (AM-GISTs, n = 851) and those with only GISTs (GISTs-1, n = 7660) were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries (1988–2016). Clinicopathologic characteristics and survival were compared between the two groups.

Results

The most commonly diagnosed first primary malignancy was prostate cancer (27.7%), followed by breast cancer (16.2%). OS among AM-GISTs was significantly inferior to that of GISTs-1; 10-year OS was 40.3% vs. 50.0%, (p < 0.001). A contrary finding was observed for GSS (10-year GSS 68.9% vs. 61.8%, p = 0.002). In the AM-GISTs group, a total of 338 patients died, of which 26.0% died of their initial cancer and 40.8% died of GISTs. Independent of demographics and clinicopathological characteristics, mortality from GISTs among AM-GISTs patients was decreased compared with their GISTs-1 counterparts (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.59–0.84; p < 0.001), whereas OS was inferior among AM-GISTs (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.99–1.25; p = 0.085).

Conclusions

AM-GISTs patients have decreased risk of dying from GISTs compared with GIST-1. Although another malignancy history does not seemingly affect OS for GISTs patients, clinical treatment of such patients should be cautious.

A ruptured jejunal gastrointestinal stromal tumor with hemoperitoneum mimicking ovarian carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) of the small bowel is a rare malignancy and accounts for only 0.1-3% of all gastrointestinal neoplasms. GISTs may mimic gynecologic tumors. The authors present an unusual case of ruptured jejunal GIST with hemoperitoneum mimicking ovarian carcinoma.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 57-year-old postmenopausal woman presented with progressive, generalized low abdominal pain for 3 months. Computed tomography (CT) imaging depicted a 9.6 cm-sized, complex and solid mass on the left pelvic cavity and a 3.7 cm-sized heterogeneous, enhancing mass on the right adnexa, suspicious for ovarian cancer accompanied by hemoperitoneum. There was no active bleeding. Laboratory examination revealed a low level of serum hemoglobin (6.7 g/dL), and a raised serum level of CA-125 (107.0 U/mL). Based on CT imaging findings and an elevated serum level of CA-125, bilateral ovarian cancer was suspected. The patient underwent exploratory laparotomy, and frozen section of the excised mass indicated malignancy originating from the small bowel jejunum. Consequently, small bowel segmental resection with mesenteric resection was done, and a debulking operation including hysterectomy, BSO, BPLD, omentectomy, and excision of multiple metastatic masses in the peritoneum was performed. Subsequent histopathologic examination confirmed the final diagnosis of high risk GISTs of the primary small bowel jejunum. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful, and adjuvant Imatinib was administered.

CONCLUSION

The authors report an unusual case of ruptured jejunal GIST with hemoperitoneum mimicking ovarian carcinoma. Therefore, GIST, in addition to ovarian cancer, should be considered in patients with an increased serum level of CA-125 and an abdominopelvic mass.

Frequency, localization, and types of gastrointestinal stromal tumor-associated neoplasia

BACKGROUND

In recent years, increasing evidence of second neoplasms associated with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) has been found. Numerous case reports, mostly retrospective studies and a few reviews, have been published. To our knowledge, however, no systematic review or meta-analysis of the existing data has been performed so far.

AIM

To prepare a compilation, as complete as possible, of all reported second tumor entities that have been described in association with GIST and to systematically analyze the published studies with regard to frequency, localization, and types of GIST-associated neoplasms.

METHODS

The MEDLINE and EBSCO databases were searched for a combination of the keywords GIST/secondary, synchronous, coincident/tumor, neoplasm, and relevant publications were selected by two independent authors.

RESULTS

Initially, 3042 publications were found. After deletion of duplicates, 1631 remained, and 130 papers were selected; 22 of these were original studies with a minimum of 20 patients, and 108 were case reports. In the 22 selected studies, comprising a total number of 12050 patients, an overall rate of GIST-associated neoplasias of 20% could be calculated. Most second neoplasias were found in the gastrointestinal tract (32%) and in the male and female urogenital tract (30%). The specific risk scores of GISTs associated with other tumors were significantly lower than those without associated neoplasias.

CONCLUSION

In this first systematic review, we could confirm previously reported findings of a more than coincidental association between GIST and other neoplasias. The question whether there is an underlying causal association will need further investigation. Our data suggest that even GIST with a very low risk of disease progression should prompt screening for second neoplasia and subsequent frequent controls or extended staging.

Malignancies associated with GIST: a retrospective study with molecular analysis of KIT and PDGFRA

PURPOSE

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common soft tissue tumors of the GI tract. Studies have been published reporting additional neoplasms in GIST patients. This study aimed to evaluate possible associations of mutation type, morphology, and clinical aspects of GISTs.

METHODS

All cases of GIST were identified from our pathology files. Coding exons of KIT and PDGFRA in GISTs with additional malignancies were sequenced.

RESULTS

A total of 70 of 188 (37%) retrieved patients with confirmed diagnosis of GIST showed at least one additional malignant neoplasm. Fifty of these GISTs were located in the stomach (71%), 8 in the small intestine (11%), 5 in the colon/rectum (7%), and 7 cases (6.2%) were of undetermined sites of origin. The distribution of identified mutations was similar to that described in GISTs without secondary malignancies. A total of 37 of 57 cases (65%) showed mutations in the KIT gene exon 11, 3 (5%) cases in exon 9, and 1 (2%) case in exon 13. Nine tumors (16%) had mutations of the PDGFRA gene. KIT and PDGFRA wild-type status were found in seven cases (12%). Most of the secondary neoplasms were located within the GI tract (34%), in the urogenital system (24%), or the breast/female genital tract (20%).

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the high rate of additional malignant tumors in GIST patients. GIST features in these cases are very similar to those with sole GIST.

Risk of second primary tumors in GIST survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare mesenchymal tumors arising in the gastrointestinal tract. Second primary tumors (SPTs) have been reported frequently, either synchronously or during follow-up, in patients diagnosed with GISTs.

METHODS

We carried out an electronic search of PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library seeking articles investigating the incidence of SPTs in patients with concomitant GIST. All studies were evaluated for heterogeneity before meta-analysis and for publication bias. Pooled incidence rate was estimated using fixed- and random-effects models. Subsite of SPTs was also investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 32 studies met the inclusion criteria, for a total of 19,627 patients with a diagnosis of GIST. The pooled prevalence of SPTs was 20%, with 14% and 3% being synchronous and metachronous tumors, respectively. We found a risk for several specific cancer sites, in particular gastrointestinal (5%) and genitourinary tract cancers (3%). The most frequently associated malignancies were: colorectal (17%), prostate (14%), gastric (9%), esophageal (5.5%), lung (5.4%), hepato-biliopancreatic (4.7%), breast (4.6%), lymphoma (4.4%), kidney (4.35%), and sarcomas (3.3%). Regression analyses revealed a significant positive association for all SPTs with follow-up and Miettinen risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that 20% of patients with GIST experienced a SPT, primarily synchronously with a diagnosis of GIST. In particular, we observed an excess of incident gastrointestinal tumors. These findings have important implications for both pathologists, who should perform extensive molecular analysis of surgical non-GIST specimens in resected patients, and for oncologists, who should continue to follow up GIST patients.

Coincident primary breast lymphoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumor: case series and molecular mechanisms

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is an uncommon mesenchymal tumor, and has been shown to be associated with synchronous or metachronous second malignancies. Rare cases of coincident GIST and non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) have been reported previously. Here, we report two cases of GIST and coincident primary breast lymphoma, an uncommon subtype of extranodal NHL. We propose that the exceedingly low likelihood of both these cancers occurring in these two patients by chance warrants examination for possible common oncogenic pathways in these lesions, possibly involving shared anti-apoptotic mechanisms. Further research is vital to elucidate common oncogenic pathways between such rare lesions.

Additional malignancies in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST): incidence, pathology and prognosis according to a time of occurrence-based classification

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study is to clarify if a classification based on the time of occurrence of associated malignancies in GIST patients can help in the understanding of the clinical controversies observed in these patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all the patients diagnosed with GIST tumors between January 1999 and October 2016. They were divided into GIST patients associated with other tumors (A-GIST) and those not associated (NA-GIST). A-GIST patients were also divided into four types according to the proposed classification.

RESULTS

Of 104 GIST patients, 32 (30.7%) (A-GIST group) had at least one additional primary malignancy. The most frequent location of the associated malignancy was the GI tract (26%). Compared to NA-GIST, A-GIST were more often asymptomatic with a lower risk of recurrence. The main cause of death in NAGIST was GIST itself, being associated tumors the main cause of death in A-GIST group. No differences were found in DFS and OS between A-GIST and NA-GIST.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the proposed classification classifies GIST patients with associated malignancies in different subtypes that differ substantially in terms of incidence, type of neoplasms associated, cause of the association and prognosis.

A nonrandom association of sarcoidosis in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor and other sarcomas

In patients with sarcoma, concomitant malignancy is found in 1.2% -2.5% of cases. Previous studies have demonstrated conflicting results in terms of positive or negative effects on cancer prognosis with comorbid sarcoidosis. Additionally, there are no data determining whether an association between sarcoidosis and sarcomas exists. Finding an association between the two entities could prevent inadvertent upstaging of a primary sarcoma based on pulmonary nodularity mistaken for metastatic disease. Here, we will describe eight sarcoma patients with concomitant occurrence of sarcoidosis identified since 2007. Eight patients with diagnosis of both sarcoma and sarcoidosis were identified over the period of 2007 -2016 at a single sarcoma center. Clinical and historical data including presentation, histology, treatment, and outcome was tabulated for analysis. The standardized incidence ratio was calculated for the state of Florida and our hospital catchment area. We compared the observed incidence to the expected incidence if the two entities were to be unrelated. Sarcoma subtype was gastrointestinal stromal tumor in five patients, the remaining three cases were unclassified spindled and epithelioid cell sarcoma, uterine leiomyosarcoma, and myxofibrosarcoma. Sarcoidosis was diagnosed before sarcoma in three patients, after sarcoma in four patients, and at the same time of sarcoma diagnosis in one patient. From our series, three patients have shown no progression of sarcoma, two are alive with sarcoma, two died due to progression of sarcoma, and one was lost to follow up. Statistical analyses showed a standardized incidence ratio of 305 (95% confidence interval: 131 -556) for the state of Florida and standardized incidence ratio of 950 (95% CI: 407 -1727) for our catchment area. This case series points to a statistically robust, nonrandom association between sarcoma and sarcoidosis that has not been previously described. Presumed metastatic sarcoma should be considered for biopsy particularly with demographic characteristics or imaging features suggestive of sarcoidosis.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Clinical Symptoms, Location, Metastasis Formation, and Associated Malignancies in a Single Center Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare malignancies but the most common mesenchymal tumors of the digestive tract. Recent advances in diagnostic imaging and an increasing incidence will confront us more frequently with stromal tumors. This single center study aimed to characterize GIST patients in terms of tumor location, clinical presentation, metastasis formation, as well as associated secondary malignancies.

METHODS

In a retrospective study, 104 patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of GIST, collected between 1993 and 2011, were characterized for several clinical features.

RESULTS

The most common GIST location was the stomach (67.6%) followed by the small intestine (16.2%). Gastrointestinal bleeding (55.8%) and abdominal pain (38.5%) were the most frequently reported symptoms whereas about one-third of patients remained clinically asymptomatic (31.6%); 14.4% of patients had either synchronous or metachronous metastases and there was a significant prevalence also in the low risk group. The proportion of secondary malignant associated neoplasms was 31% in our GIST cohort, among which gastrointestinal, genitourinary tumors, and breast cancer were the most prevalent.

CONCLUSION

There was a considerable risk for metastasis formation and the development of secondary neoplasias that should encourage discussion about the appropriate surveillance strategy after surgery for GIST.

Lack of Prognostic Significance of Connexin-43 Labeling in a Series of 46 Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Background

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are mesenchymal tumors with variable malignant potential. Connexin-43 (C×43) is the commonest gap-junction protein and has been frequently investigated in oncology. Our aim was to establish the immunohistochemical expression of C×43 in relation to GIST location, size, Ki67 index, tumor grade and follow-up.

Materials and methods

The study included postoperative samples of 46 patients treated for GIST in the 1999–2010 time frame. Complete clinical workup was available for 38 patients (82.6%); total surgical resection was carried out in 32 (84.2%) patients, while 13 (34.2%) patients underwent chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 40.7 months (range, 1-134).

Results

The calculated incidence of GIST in our setting was 11.5 per million. C×43 was expressed in 43/46 (93.5%) GIST cases, with a significant difference between stomach- and small intestine-derived tumors (p=0.006). Ki67 was 10% on average (range, 1–22) and was not correlated with tumor location (p=0.194). C×43 did not show significance with regard to tumor size (p=0.264) or higher tumor grade (p=0.658), as opposed to Ki67, which significantly correlated with both (p=0.0048 and p<0.001, respectively). C×43 and Ki67 were not significantly correlated (p=0.708). Ki67 correlated with time to recurrence (p=0.022). Ki67 >11% was taken as the indication to start imatinib chemotherapy (sensitivity 61.5%, specificity 92.0%, p=0.022). Ten (66.7%) of 15 patients with long-term (>5 years) follow-up were in remission.

Conclusion

C×43 was frequently expressed in GISTs regardless of tumor site. However, no significant relationships to histopathological parameters suggestive for prognosis were found. Further investigations might clarify the roles of C×43 in GIST oncogenesis.

Targeted ultra-deep sequencing unveils a lack of driver-gene mutations linking non-hereditary gastrointestinal stromal tumors and highly prevalent second primary malignancies: random or nonrandom, that is the question

The association of non-hereditary (sporadic) gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and second primary malignancies is known to be nonrandom, although the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unknown. In this study, 136 of 749 (18.1%) patients with sporadic GISTs were found to have additional associated cancers, with gastrointestinal and genitourinary/gynecologic/breast cancers being the most prevalent. Gene mutations in GISTs and their associated colorectal cancers (CRCs) (n=9) were analyzed using a panel of 409 cancer-related genes, while a separate group of 40 sporadic CRCs not associated with GISTs served as controls. All 9 of the GISTs had either KIT (8 of 9) or PDGFRA (1 of 9) mutations that were not present in their associated CRCs. Conversely, all but one of the 9 GIST-associated CRCs exhibited an APC mutation, a TP53 mutation or both, while none of their corresponding GISTs harbored either APC or TP53 mutations. The genetic profile of CRCs with and without associated GISTs did not differ. Although population-based studies and case series worldwide, including ours, have unanimously indicated that the GIST-CRC association is nonrandom, our targeted ultra-deep sequencing unveiled a lack of driver-gene mutations linking sporadic GISTs to highly prevalent second primaries. Further studies are needed to elucidate other genetic alterations that may be responsible for this puzzling contradiction.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumour and second tumours: A literature review

There are several tumours associated with gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST), most of them without an apparent family relationship; only 5% of them occur within the context of a family syndrome. In this article the corresponding literature about the former has been reviewed. A search in Pubmed was carried out, the methodology of which is described in detail in the body of the article. A total of 88 articles have been chosen for the review, next to the application of limits as well as a manual review. GIST patients have a twofold risk of developing a second tumour than the general population (4-33% of them develop a second neoplasm, either synchronic or metachronic). Most incident tumours associated with GIST are gastrointestinal and genitourinary tumours. In addition, patients with second tumours have a worse survival rate than those without second tumours.

Clinical analysis and prognosis of synchronous and metachronous multiple primary malignant tumors

The aim of this study was to determine the clinical features, treatment factors, and prognosis of patients with multiple primary malignant tumors (MPMTs). In total, 161 patients with MPMTs at our hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China) were analyzed in this study. We found that among 161 patients with MPMTs, 78 (48.4%) patients had synchronous tumors and 83 (51.6%) patients had metachronous tumors. Most clinical and pathological features were similar in both groups. Most patients with MPMTs were men and older patients (>50 years old), and adenocarcinoma was the most frequent pathology type. The most frequent location of all MPMTs was the digestive system. The leading tumor association was between digestive-digestive tumors, also. However, patients with synchronous tumors and MPMTs of the digestive system showed a shorter survival time. In the metachronous cancer group, the median interval time was 60 months, and a short interval time (≤60 months) was associated with a shorter survival time. In addition, survival time was increased in the younger age group (≤50 years old) and in patients who accepted surgery-based comprehensive therapy. However, only interval time (≤60 months) was an independent prognostic factor associated with survival for the metachronous cancer group. Therefore, careful surveillance and follow-up are especially important in these patients.

Efficacy of erlotinib and imatinib in a patient with a rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor and synchronous pulmonary adenocarcinoma: A case report

The synchronous existence of lung cancer and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is considered to be extremely rare. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report about the treatment of lung cancer and GIST with two kinds of molecular targeting drugs. An 83-year-old woman with a rectal GIST, which carried a c-kit mutation, and pulmonary adenocarcinoma, which exhibited an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, was treated alternately with imatinib and erlotinib. Good control over both diseases was achieved for two years. The present case is not only of interest due to the rare co-occurrence of GIST and lung cancer, but also because it involved two tumors carrying different gene mutations, and both tumors were brought under control using different molecular targeting drugs.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) presenting as a strangulated inguinal hernia with small bowel obstruction

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) can arise everywhere along the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Their presentation in unusual locations should always be taken into account. A 74-year-old man referred to the emergency department for small bowel obstruction caused by an incarcerated inguinal hernia. A CT scan showed a mesenchymal tumour originating from the herniated bowel loop and a mass in the ascending colon. Laparoscopic resection of the mass and laparoscopic right hemicolectomy were performed. The histology showed a ruptured GIST arising from the herniated small bowel and a high-grade dysplasia villous adenoma of the right colon. GISTs can present with symptoms spanning from vague abdominal discomfort to surgical urgencies. Strangulated hernia is an extremely rare presentation, with only two cases described in the literature. A safe surgical approach was obtained with laparoscopy, maintaining surgical radicality. The ileal localisation and the pseudocapsule rupture were the main risk factors on prognostic stratification.

Clinicopathological features and prognosis of coexistence of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor and gastric cancer

The coexistence of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) and gastric cancer is relatively high, and its prognosis is controversial due to the complex and variant kinds of presentation. Thus, the present study aimed to explore the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of gastric GIST with synchronous gastric cancer.From May 2010 to November 2015, a total of 241 gastric GIST patients were retrospectively enrolled in the present study. The patients with coexistence of gastric GIST and gastric cancer were recorded. The clinicopathological features and prognoses of patients were analyzed.Among 241 patients, 24 patients had synchronous gastric cancer (synchronous group) and 217 patients did not (no-synchronous group). The synchronous group presented a higher percentage of elders (66.7% vs 39.6%, P = 0.001) and males (87.5% vs 48.4%, P < 0.001) than the no-synchronous group. The tumor diameter, mitotic index, and National Institutes of Health degree were also significantly different between the 2 groups (all P < 0.05). The 5-year disease-free survival and disease-specific survival rates of synchronous group were significantly lower than those of no-synchronous group (54.9% vs 93.5%, P < 0.001; 37.9% vs 89.9%, P < 0.001, respectively). However, the 5-year overall survival rates between synchronous and gastric cancer groups were comparable (37.9% vs 57.6%, P = 0.474).The coexistence of gastric GIST and gastric cancer was common in elder male patients. The synchronous GIST was common in low-risk category. The prognosis of gastric GIST with synchronous gastric cancer was worse than that of primary-single gastric GIST, but was comparable with primary-single gastric cancer.

The Occurrence of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors and Second Malignancies. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2015;46:408-412. [PMID: 26337186 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-015-9759-3]

PURPOSE

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal malignancy of the gastrointestinal tract. GISTs may coexist with different types of cancer, either synchronous or metachronous. The frequency of this association and the spectrum of neoplasms involved have not been sufficiently analyzed; most of publications describe a single case report and rare case series. In the absence of definitive data, it could be interesting to compare the frequency of the occurrence of GIST and second malignancies in literature.

METHODS

A review of all case series that reported the frequency of the occurrence of GIST and synchronous second malignancies were considered.

RESULTS

Six retrospective case series were considered, including 440 GIST patients; of these, there were 64 (14.5 %) patients with other synchronous second malignancies. Median age was 67 years, median GIST size was 3.91 cm (range 3.0-4.79 cm), and all cases (100.0 %) were CD117 and CD34 positive. According to the risk categories, 35.2 % of patients had a very low risk, 24.0 % a low risk, 27.6 % an intermediate risk, and 13.2 % a high risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Regarding the occurrence of GISTs and synchronous second malignancies, we can consider it as more common than it has been considered. Differently, concerning the topic of the incidence of second primary malignancies (SPMs) and metachronous second malignancies in pre-imatinib and after-imatinib era, we can consider it as a clinically relevant topic; according to the present knowledge, the main cause for the increased incidence of SPMs in the imatinib era is explained by the increased survival of patients with metastatic GISTs and therefore more time available to develop SPMs.

[Additional primary malignancies in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Proposal for a new classification]

Additional primary malignancies in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is not only common but of growing interest in the scientific literature. This association is of great importance in terms of clinical challenge, diagnosis and therapy as well as for the prognosis impact it implies. In the published series there is a tendency to group these patients to determine the specific and distinguishable characteristics of GIST associated with other malignancies. On the other hand, there is no general consensus or unified classification. This classification would be of great interest, as it would unify criteria, agree groups to compare different series and demonstrate whether the aetiology underlying both tumours and the GIST's own characteristics really vary according to the type in question. We undertook a medical literature review and proposed a new classification for patients with GIST associated with other tumours.

The impact of additional malignancies in patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumors

A higher incidence of additional malignancies has been described in patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). This study aimed to identify risk factors for developing additional malignancies in patients diagnosed with GIST and evaluate the impact on survival. Individuals diagnosed with GIST from 2001 to2009 were identified from the SEER database. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of additional malignancies and Cox-proportional hazards regression used to identify predictors of survival. In the study period, 1705 cases of GIST were identified, with 181 (10.6%) patients developing additional malignancies. Colorectal cancer was the most common cancer developing within 6 months of GIST diagnosis (30%). The median time to diagnosis of a malignancy after 6 months of GIST diagnosis was 21.9 months. Older age (p < 0.0001) and extraoesophagogastric GIST (p = 0.0027) were significant prognostic factors associated with additional malignancies. The overall 5-year survival was 65%, with the presence of additional malignancies within 6 months of GIST diagnosis associated with poor overall survival (54%, HR 1.55 1.05-2.3 95% CI, p = 0.04). Predictive factors of additional malignancies in patients diagnosed with GIST are increasing age and the primary disease site. Developing additional malignancies within 6 months of GIST diagnosis is associated with poorer overall survival. Targeted surveillance may be warranted in patients diagnosed with GIST that are at high risk of developing additional malignancies.

Synchronous gastrointestinal cancer and gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a single-institution experience

Background

A study was conducted to investigate the clinicopathological features and survival outcomes of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) that are synchronous with other gastrointestinal cancers.

Methods

Clinical and pathological data of 286 patients with primary GIST from a single institution from January 2009 to December 2014 were reviewed.

Results

The entire study population comprised 286 patients with GISTs. Of these patients, 167 (58.4 %) were males and 119 (41.6 %) were females. The median age was 58 years old (in the range 29–86 years). A total of 47 patients were diagnosed with GISTs synchronous with other digestive tract malignancies (synchronous group), whereas 239 patients were diagnosed with non-synchronous disease (non-synchronous group). The concomitant digestive tumors in 27, 12, 7, and 1 patients were diagnosed as gastric carcinoma, esophageal carcinoma, colorectal carcinoma, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma, respectively. Compared with the synchronous group, the non-synchronous group exhibited a higher percentage of increased mitotic count (P = 0.011). The difference in tumor diameter between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Patients in the non-synchronous group exhibited larger tumor size than the patients in the synchronous group (5.9 ± 3.5 cm vs. 1.6 ± 0.4 cm, P < 0.001). The majority of GIST lesions in the synchronous group were located in the stomach (P = 0.020). Lower risk stratifications and worse ECOG performance statuses were observed in the synchronous group (P < 0.001) than in the non-synchronous group. The 5-year overall survival rate was significantly higher in patients with no synchronous digestive tract malignancies than in patients with synchronous disease (70.8 vs. 34.1 %, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Patients with GIST synchronous with other gastrointestinal cancers show worse prognosis than those with non-synchronous tumors. Clinicians should pay more attention to this subgroup.

Concurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumor and digestive tract carcinoma: a single institution experience in China

The aim of this study was to review the clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with concurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) and digestive tract carcinoma. Among 585 patients diagnosed with GIST from January 2005 to July 2014, 32 (5.5%) had synchronous digestive tract carcinoma, including 19 (59.4%) men and 13 (40.6%) women. The median age was 64 years (range, 43-84). GIST was located in the stomach (n=24), small intestine (n=6), duodenum (n=1) and retroperitoneum (n=1). GISTs were intra- or postoperatively discovered (n=28) or preoperatively identified (n=4). The tumor size was less than 10 mm (microGIST) in 23 (71.9%) GIST patients. The preoperatively identified GIST subgroup showed a significantly larger tumor size, more mitotic figures and a higher risk grade than the intra- or postoperatively identified GIST subgroup. Concurrent digestive tract carcinomas were most frequently located in the stomach (24 cases, 75%). The other involved sites were the esophagus (n=5), duodenum (n=2) and colon (n=1). With a median follow-up of 32 months (range, 9-80), 24 patients were alive without evidence of disease, 6 patients had died of carcinoma progression, 1 patient had died from an accident, and 1 patient experienced GIST metastasis to the liver. In summary, we discovered that 5.5% of GIST patients also developed a concurrent digestive tract carcinoma in a series of 585 GIST cases. The majority of GISTs are incidentally identified microGISTs. The concurrent carcinoma seems to have a greater unfavorable effect on prognosis than the GIST. However, for a GIST that is identified preoperatively with a high risk of progression, adjuvant therapy is warranted.

A novel germline mutation in SDHA identified in a rare case of gastrointestinal stromal tumor complicated with renal cell carcinoma

Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), which is located on the mitochondrial inner membrane, is essential to the Krebs cycle. Mutations of the SDH gene are associated with many tumors, such as renal cell carcinoma, wild type gastrointestinal stromal tumors (WT GISTs) and hereditary paragangliomas/pheochromocytomas. Herein we present a rare case diagnosed as a WT GIST complicated with a renal chromophobe cell tumor and detected a novel germline heterozygous mutation (c.2T>C: p.M1T) in the initiation codon of the SDHA gene. We also conduct a preliminary exploration for the mechanism of reduced expression of SDHB without mutation of SDHB gene. Our case enriches the mutation spectrum of the SDH gene. After reviewing previous studies, we found it to be the first case diagnosed as a WT GIST complicated with a synchronous renal chromophobe cell tumor and identified a novel germline heterozygous mutation. It was also the second reported case of a renal cell carcinoma associated with an SDHA mutation.

Frequence, spectrum and prognostic impact of additional malignancies in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Currently available data on prognostic implication of additional neoplasms in GIST miss comprehensive information on patient outcome with regard to overall or disease specific and disease free survival. Registry data of GIST patients with and without additional neoplasm were compared in retrospective case series. We investigated a total of 836 patients from the multi-center Ulmer GIST registry. Additionally, a second cohort encompassing 143 consecutively recruited patients of a single oncology center were analyzed. The frequency of additional malignant neoplasms in GIST patients was 31.9% and 42.0% in both cohorts with a mean follow-up time of 54 and 65 months (median 48 and 60 months), respectively. The spectrum of additional neoplasms in both cohorts encompasses gastrointestinal tumors (43.5%), uro-genital and breast cancers (34.1%), hematological malignancies (7.3%), skin cancer (7.3%) and others. Additional neoplasms have had a significant impact on patient outcome. The five year overall survival in GIST with additional malignant neoplasms (n = 267) was 62.8% compared to 83.4% in patients without other tumors (n = 569) (P < .001, HR=0.397, 95% CI: 0.298-0.530). Five-year disease specific survival was not different between both groups (90.8% versus 90.9%). 34.2% of all deaths (n = 66 of n = 193) were GIST-related. The presented data suggest a close association between the duration of follow-up and the rate of additional malignancies in GIST patients. Moreover the data indicate a strong impact of additional malignant neoplasms in GIST on patient outcome. A comprehensive follow-up strategy of GIST patients appears to be warranted.

High APRIL expression correlates with unfavourable survival of gastrointestinal stromal tumour

A proliferation inducing ligand (APRIL) is a member of the tumour necrosis factor superfamily. High APRIL expression has been found to correlate with tumour development, suggesting that APRIL participates in oncogenesis. However, little is known about APRIL expression in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) or the relationship between APRIL expression and the clinical characteristics of GIST. Therefore, we assessed the expression of APRIL immunohistochemically using a tissue microarray from 178 patients with GIST and evaluated the relationship between APRIL expression and patient prognosis. Strong APRIL expression was observed in 42.7% of GISTs, with APRIL expression significantly associated with tumour diameter, gross classification and tumour grade (p < 0.05 each). Kaplan-Meier analysis suggested that low APRIL expression and tumour size <5 cm were associated with longer overall survival. These findings indicate that APRIL expression is correlated with malignant GIST phenotypes and it may serve as an unfavourable prognostic marker in patients with GIST.