Influence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) viraemia upon serum aminotransferase activity in chronic dialysis patients

Recent Information on Pan-Genotypic Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents for HCV in Chronic Kidney Disease

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is still common in patients with chronic kidney disease. It has been recently discovered that chronic HCV is a risk factor for increased incidence of CKD in the adult general population. According to a systematic review with a meta-analysis of clinical studies, pooling results of longitudinal studies (n = 2,299,134 unique patients) demonstrated an association between positive anti-HCV serologic status and increased incidence of CKD; the summary estimate for adjusted HR across the surveys was 1.54 (95% CI, 1.26; 1.87), (p < 0.0001). The introduction of direct-acting antiviral drugs (DAAs) has caused a paradigm shift in the management of HCV infection; recent guidelines recommend pan-genotypic drugs (i.e., drugs effective on all HCV genotypes) as the first-choice therapy for HCV, and these promise to be effective and safe even in the context of chronic kidney disease.

AIM

The purpose of this narrative review is to show the most important data on pan-genotypic DAAs in advanced CKD (CKD stage 4/5).

METHODS

We recruited studies by electronic databases and grey literature. Numerous key-words ('Hepatitis C' AND 'Chronic kidney disease' AND 'Pan-genotypic agents', among others) were adopted.

RESULTS

The most important pan-genotypic combinations for HCV in advanced CKD are glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL). Two clinical trials (EXPEDITION-4 and EXPEDITION-5) and some 'real-world' studies (n = 6) reported that GLE/PIB combinations in CKD stage 4/5 gave SVR12 rates ranging between 86 and 99%. We retrieved clinical trials (n = 1) and 'real life' studies (n = 6) showing the performance of SOF/VEL; according to our pooled analysis, the summary estimate of SVR rate was 100% in studies adopting SOF/VEL antiviral combinations. The drop-out rate (due to AEs) in patients on SOF/VEL ranged between 0 and 4.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Pan-genotypic combinations, such as GLE/PIB and SOF/VEL, appear effective and safe for HCV in advanced CKD, even if a limited number of studies with small sample sizes currently exist on this issue. Studies are under way to assess whether successful antiviral therapy with DAAs will translate into better survival in patients with advanced CKD.

Evaluation of Liver Enzymes in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients on the Renal Transplant-Waiting List in North-West of Iran

Background: Liver diseases, mainly hepatitis B and C, commonly occur in patients with end-stage renal diseases (ESRD). Alanine and aspartate aminotransferase are important for the diagnosis and monitoring of liver diseases. Several studies demonstrated that patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have lower levels of serum aminotransferases than the normal population. The present study was designed to compare these enzymes in different types of dialysis in ESRD patients and the general population in Iran. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, ESRD patients who were candidates for organ transplants in Montaserieh Hospital in Mashhad (Iran) from 2007 to 2014 were enrolled. The data of 1116 patients were collected by reviewing their medical records. Patients were divided into two groups of hemodialysis (n = 1034) and peritoneal dialysis (n = 82); their liver enzymes were compared with 510 healthy individuals from the MASHAD study. Results: There was a significant difference between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients and the control group regarding the age (P < 0.0001) and gender (P = 0.005). Conclusions: The reduction in serum aminotransferase levels in ESRD cases compared to the control group suggested that renal failure influences liver enzymes that were mildly increased in peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis patients in samples provided before the dialysis session.

Epidemiology of GB Virus C/Hepatitis G Virus Infection in Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis

Background

A new genus in the family Flaviviridae has recently been discovered; it has provisionally been designated GBV-C/HGV. As determined by virologic techniques [reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)], infection with GBV-C/HGV is frequent in renal transplant (RT) recipients and in patients on chronic hemodialysis (HD). The epidemiology of GBV-C/HGV infection in patients on peritoneal dialysis is scarce and mostly based on RT-PCR technology.

Purpose

We report on the prevalence (as detected by serologic and virologic techniques) and the risk factors for GBV-C/HGV infection in a cohort of patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). We also tested a control group of blood donors.

Methods

Infection by GBV-C/HGV was assessed by serologic and virologic techniques. Cases of GBV-C/HGV viremia (GBV-C/HGV RNA) were detected by RT-PCR. Antibodies to the envelope protein of GBV-C/HGV (anti-E2 GBV-C/HGV antibody) were analyzed by serologic methods.

Results

We found a high frequency [17/85 (20%)] of GBV-C/HGV. The rates of GBV-C/HGV viremia and anti-E2 GBV-C/HGV positivity were 10.5% (9/85) and 10.5% (9/85) respectively. In most patients [17/18 (94%)], the presence of anti-E2 GBV-C/HGV antibody was associated with clearance of GBV-C/HGV from serum. No relationship was noted between anti-E2 GBV-C/HGV antibody (or GBV-C/HGV viremia) and age, sex, race, time on dialysis, anti-HCV antibody, HBsAg status, and anti-HIV positivity. The frequency of GBV-C/HGV infection in CAPD patients was much higher than that in blood donors, even if the difference did not approach statistical significance. No associations between GBV-C/HGV positivity and biochemical liver tests [aminotransferase and gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT)] were apparent.

Conclusions

Infection by GBV-C/HGV as detected by RT-PCR and anti-E2 antibody was common in patients on CAPD and in controls alike. No association was seen between GBV-C/HGV and various demographic or clinical factors. The clinical significance of GBV-C/HGV in CAPD remains unclear. Larger investigations are in progress.

Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Hemodialyzed Patients

In spite of our present improved knowledge of the epidemiology and pathways of contamination of the hepatitis C virus (HCV), infection still remains a public health problem. One category of patients who have suffered greatly from the consequences of HCV infection is certainly that of hemodialysis patients. In the past, in fact, their need for transfusions exposed these patients to infection and, as a result, subjects on dialysis for over 15 years are today paying the price for those inevitable transfusions, as the virus and its pathways of contagion were unknown then. However, still today, albeit at a much lower prevalence, even subjects with a shorter dialysis age present a higher prevalence of anti-HCV than the general population, suggesting that other factors of contamination than the classical ones contribute to keeping this prevalence high. Its clinical course is generally asymptomatic and the biological and virological progression of the disease is quite particular and apparently benign. The mortality rate of infected patients is higher than in non-infected subjects and this is not only due to the liver disease itself but also to cardiovascular disorders.

Even anti-viral therapy, after its first timid steps, is now routinely used in patients with a certain degree of liver damage and kidney transplant candidates. The appropriate use of pegylated interferons is expected to improve the percentage of eradication and limit side effects, in parallel with what has been observed in non-dialysis patients. Ribavirin, however, is at present contraindicated due to its toxic effects on red blood cells as hemoglobin content could be dangerously reduced in these patients.

Direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus in patients on maintenance dialysis

The frequency of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains high in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and plays a detrimental role in mortality in this population. According to the latest survey, the adjusted hazard ratio for HCV-positive versus HCV-negative patients on long-term dialysis was 1.12 (95% CI, 1.05 to 1.20) and 1.10 (95% CI, 0.98 to 1.22) for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, respectively. An impairment on quality of life has also been documented in HCV-infected patients undergoing regular dialysis. Most clinicians have been so far reluctant to treat hepatitis C in patients with advanced CKD, due to concerns regarding low efficacy and safety of interferon-based regimens. The advent of all-oral, direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has revolutionized treatment paradigms for HCV, including patients with other comorbidities such as CKD. Two combinations of DAAs have been recently approved for the treatment of HCV in advanced CKD: elbasvir/grazoprevir (evaluated in 1 randomized controlled trial) and ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir/dasabuvir with or without ribavirin (examined in some observational, single-arm studies). These antiviral combinations have provided high safety and efficacy (SVR12 rates >90%) in HCV-infected patients with stage 4-5 CKD. Sofosbuvir, a nucleotide analogue inhibitor of the HCV NS5B polymerase, is the cornerstone of most anti-HCV current regimens but is not currently recommended for patients with severe renal insufficiency (eGFR <30 mL/min per 1.73 m2). However, several small-sized studies have been published on the safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir-based regimens for patients with hepatitis C on maintenance dialysis; overall, the viral response was satisfactory (SVR12 rates ranging between 58% and 100%) with a few drug-related drop-outs. Studies are in progress to assess whether ribavirin-free antiviral combinations with novel DAAs are a viable option for patients with severe renal impairment and chronic HCV infection.

Occult hepatitis C virus infection among Egyptian hemodialysis patients

Occult hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (OCI) was reported in an apparently disease-free state in the absence of liver disease, anti-HCV and HCV-RNA in the serum. The existing data examining the clinical significance of OCI and its potential as a source of HCV infection among hemodialysis patients are very limited. We examined the presence of OCI among patients on maintenance hemodialysis at Minia Governorate, Egypt; an HCV endemic country. A total of 81 subjects with negative markers for HCV were enrolled. HCV-RNA was tested in PBMCs by real-time PCR. For the 81 subjects, the average dialysis duration was 32.7 ± 21.7 months and the average ALT level (±SD) was 26 ± 12 U/L while that of AST was 29 ± 16 U/L. Out of the 81 subjects, three (3.7%) were HCV-RNA positive in PBMCs in the absence of serum anti-HCV and HCV-RNA indicating OCI. The viral load of the OCI subjects ranged from 172 to 4150 IU/ml. History of liver disease was positive in one of the three positive patients. These results highlight the potential risk of HCV transmission from patients within hemodialysis units in Egypt. J. Med. Virol. 88:1388-1393, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Association between serum aminotransferase enzymes–lipid profile ratio and spontaneous HCV clearance in blood donors

Aim: Study the role of the aminotransferase lipid profile ratio in the spontaneous clearance of HCV. Materials & methods: Blood samples from 68 blood donors were classified into three groups: negative for HCV antibodies (control group I), positive anti-HCV with negative HCV-RNA, (group II) and positive anti-HCV with positive HCV-RNA (group III). Results: A significant linear correlation was observed between the HCV-RNA levels and aminotransferase enzymes–lipid profile ratio as indicated by the values of (AST)/triglycerides (r = 0.577; p = 0.003) and ALT/triglycerides (r = 0.508; p < 0.009). AST/high-density lipoprotein had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.72 for discriminating between nonspontaneous HCV-clearance from spontaneous HCV-clearance patients. Conclusion: AST/high-density lipoprotein can be used for the prediction of HCV clearance without treatment.

Utility of routine real time quantitative PCR monitoring of HCV infection in haemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection causes significant morbidity and mortality in patients of end stage renal disease (ESRD) on haemodialysis (HD). Stringent screening methods can help in its early diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

The study addresses the utility of real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) in the diagnosis and monitoring of HCV infection especially on seronegative and normal serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) HD patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study was carried out from January 2010 to December 2012. Patients of ESRD on maintenance HD and on whom all the three assays HCV antibody serology, PCR and ALT were done were included in the study (n=123). Group 1 (n=57), comprised of patients with negative serology and normal ALT, and Group 2 (n=66), had either raised ALT and or a positive or equivocal serology.

RESULTS

Out of the 123 cases studied, HCV serology was positive in 36.5% (45), ALT raised in 18.6% (23) and PCR positive in 67.4% (83) cases. PCR positivity was significantly higher than serology and raised ALT. Group 2 had a significantly higher PCR positivity than Group 1 (P=0.0004), but 50.9% patients of Group 1, were also PCR positive and 69% of them had a high viral count of >8×10(5) IU/ml at the time of detection.

CONCLUSION

Regular routine screening of HCV by RQ-PCR in ESRD patients can help in early diagnosis of HCV infection in patients with low index of suspicion.

Liver enzymes serum levels in patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis: a comprehensive review

We reviewed the literature regarding the serum levels of the enzymes aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and gamma-glutamyl transferase in patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis with and without viral hepatitis. Original articles published up to January 2013 on adult patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis were selected. These articles contained the words "transaminases" "aspartate aminotransferase" "alanine aminotransferase" "gamma glutamyl transferase," "liver enzymes", AND "dialysis" OR "hemodialysis". A total of 823 articles were retrieved. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 49 articles were selected. The patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis had reduced serum levels of aminotransferases due to hemodilution, lower pyridoxine levels, or elevated homocysteine levels. The chronic kidney disease patients on hemodialysis infected with the hepatitis C virus also had lower aminotransferase levels compared with the infected patients without chronic kidney disease. This reduction is in part due to decreased viremia caused by the dialysis method, the production of a hepatocyte growth factor and endogenous interferon-α, and lymphocyte activation, which decreases viral action on hepatocytes. Few studies were retrieved on gamma-glutamyl transferase serum levels; those found reported that there were no differences between the patients with or without chronic kidney disease. The serum aminotransferase levels were lower in the patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis (with or without viral hepatitis) than in the patients with normal renal function; this reduction has a multifactorial origin.

Hepatitis C virus and kidney disease

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the most frequently observed viral infection in patients with kidney disease. HCV can cause glomerular disease, which can lead to end-stage renal disease that requires dialysis and/or kidney transplantation. It is recommended to test HCV patients once a year for proteinuria, microscopic hematuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis is the most common glomerular disease induced by HCV. Over the past few decades, the prevalence of HCV infection has decreased among dialysis and kidney transplant patients. However, survival is significantly lower in HCV-positive than in HCV-negative dialysis patients whereas survival is significantly better in HCV-positive kidney transplant patients compared with HCV-positive dialysis patients. Thus, dialysis patients without a sustained virological response after anti-HCV therapy should be proposed for kidney transplantation. Recurrence or de novo occurrence of glomerular disease is responsible for the lower kidney allograft survival in HCV-positive compared with HCV-negative kidney transplant patients. Dialysis and kidney transplantation do not appear to negatively affect progression of liver fibrosis in the majority of patients. The available data also suggest that occult HCV infection does not exist in dialysis and kidney transplant patients.

Treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in patients with end-stage renal disease

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major health problem in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The incidence of acute HCV infection during maintenance dialysis is much higher than that in the general population because of the risk of nosocomial transmission. Following acute HCV infection, most patients develop chronic HCV infection, and a significant proportion develop chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and even hepatocellular carcinoma. Overall, chronic hepatitis C patients on hemodialysis bear an increased risk of liver-related morbidity and mortality, either during dialysis or after renal transplantation. Interferon (IFN) therapy is modestly effective for the treatment of HCV infection in ESRD patients. Conventional or pegylated IFN monotherapy has been used to treat acute hepatitis C in ESRD patients with excellent safety and efficacy. Regarding chronic hepatitis C, approximately one-third of patients can achieve a sustained virological response (SVR) after conventional or pegylated IFN monotherapy. The combination of low-dose ribavirin and conventional or pegylated IFN has further improved the SVR rate in treatment-naïve or retreated ESRD patients in clinical trials. Similar to the treatment of patients with normal renal function, baseline and on-treatment HCV virokinetics are useful to guide optimized therapy in ESRD patients. Of particular note, IFN-based therapy is not recommended at the post-renal transplantation stage because of the low SVR rate and risk of acute graft rejection. In conclusion, ESRD patients with HCV infection should be encouraged to receive antiviral therapy, and those who achieve an SVR usually have long-term, durable, virological, biochemical, and histological responses.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in dialysis patients: an update. Hepat Res Treat. 2010;2010:267412. [PMID: 21152180 PMCID: PMC2989752 DOI: 10.1155/2010/267412]

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a blood-borne infection and its prevalence used to be elevated in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Its main mode of contamination relies on nosocomial transmission. HCV infection is frequently associated in HD patients with normal liver enzymes whereas liver histology can display some degree of HCV-related lesions. The assessment of HCV-related lesions, even in HD dialysis patients, can be done via noninvasive tests. After kidney transplantation, HCV-related lesions can worsen; however, in this setting antiviral treatment harbors the risk of acute rejection. Therefore, it is recommended to implement antiviral treatment while the patient is receiving dialysis therapy. In this setting, the rate of viral clearance is usually high. In case of sustained virological response, no relapse occurs after kidney transplantation, despite heavy immunosuppression.

Hepatic disorders in chronic kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2010;6:395-403. [PMID: 20386560 DOI: 10.1038/nrneph.2010.37]

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are the most common and serious causes of liver damage in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The natural histories of HBV and HCV infections in patients with CKD are not fully understood; however, recent evidence has emphasized the adverse effect of HBV and/or HCV infection on survival in this population. Chronic liver disease is the fourth most important cause of death after renal transplantation. The negative effect of HCV infection on survival among renal transplant recipients has been linked to liver dysfunction and extrahepatic complications, such as chronic glomerulonephritis, post-transplantation diabetes mellitus, chronic allograft nephropathy, and sepsis. The transmission of HCV by solid organ transplantation has been unequivocally demonstrated. Renal transplant recipients who receive kidneys from HCV-positive donors are at increased risk of death. Although several studies have shown that in patients with HCV infection and chronic renal failure renal transplantation is associated with better survival than is dialysis, recent clinical guidelines recommend that kidneys from HCV-infected donors should not be used in HCV-seropositive recipients without detectable HCV viremia. Monotherapy with conventional interferon has been suggested to be a useful treatment for hepatitis C infection in patients on dialysis. Although no evidence suggests that patients with CKD are more prone to suffer from hepatic toxic effects than individuals with normal kidney function, patients with CKD usually receive multiple medications; and drug interactions may, therefore, have a role in the pathogenesis of drug-induced liver disease in this population.

Infecção pelo vírus da hepatite c em pacientes em hemodiálise: prevalência e fatores de risco

CONTEXTO: Doentes com doença renal crônica em tratamento hemodialítico apresentam risco aumentado de aquisição do vírus da hepatite C (VHC). Elevadas taxas de prevalência têm sido detectadas em unidades de diálise do mundo inteiro. Estudos recentes têm demonstrado que a infecção pelo VHC interfere de forma negativa na sobrevida dos pacientes em hemodiálise e naqueles submetidos ao transplante renal. OBJETIVOS: Determinar a prevalência e os fatores de risco da infecção pelo VHC em pacientes submetidos a hemodiálise. MÉTODOS: Realizou-se estudo transversal entre janeiro e dezembro de 2007. Neste período, 236 pacientes em hemodiálise foram testados pelo ELISA de terceira geração. Os casos positivos foram submetidos a pesquisa qualitativa do HCV-RNA pelo método de PCR. Consideraram-se como portadores de infecção pelo VHC aqueles pacientes com anti-VHC e HCV-RNA positivos. Dosagens mensais de ALT e a média do valor de 12 meses foram obtidas em 195 pacientes. Do total de pacientes, 208 (88,1%) responderam ao questionário padronizado visando a identificação de fatores de risco associados à infecção pelo VHC. RESULTADOS: A prevalência de pacientes anti-VHC positivos encontrada entre os 236 testados foi de 14,8% (35/236); destes, a pesquisa do HCV-RNA foi positiva em 71,6% (25/35). Portanto, a prevalência da infecção crônica pelo VHC foi de 10,6% (25/236) dos pacientes. Pela análise bivariada, os principais fatores de risco associados à infecção pelo VHC foram o tempo de hemodiálise, o número de transfusões de sangue, a realização prévia de diálise peritonial e história de doença sexualmente transmissível. Contudo, após análise multivariada, somente o tempo de hemodiálise e história de doença sexualmente transmissível foram significativamente associados à infecção pelo VHC. Pacientes com mais de 10 anos de hemodiálise apresentaram risco de aquisição do VHC 73,9 (IC de 17,5 a 311,8) vezes maior quando comparados a pacientes com até 5 anos de tratamento. Indivíduos com doença sexualmente transmissível prévia apresentaram risco 4,8 (IC de 1,1 a 19,9) vezes superior de contaminação pelo VHC quando comparados àqueles sem doença sexualmente transmissível. O valor médio da ALT foi significantemente maior nos pacientes infectados pelo VHC (44,0 ± 13,5 U/L versus 33,5 ± 8,0 U/L, P<0,001). CONCLUSÃO: A infecção pelo VHC apresentou elevada prevalência na unidade de diálise analisada. O tempo de tratamento dialítico e história prévia de doença sexualmente transmissível foram os principais fatores de risco associados à infecção pelo VHC. Indivíduos em hemodiálise com infecção crônica pelo VHC apresentaram maior atividade de ALT que pacientes sem hepatite C crônica.

No evidence of occult hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in serum of HCV antibody-positive HCV RNA-negative kidney-transplant patients

Persistence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in patients who cleared HCV is still debated. Occult HCV infection is described as the presence of detectable HCV RNA in liver or peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of patients with undetectable plasma HCV-RNA by conventional PCR assays. We have assessed the persistence of HCV in 26 kidney-transplant patients, followed up for 10.5 years (range 2-16), after HCV elimination while on hemodialysis. If HCV really did persist, arising out of the loss of immune control caused by institution of the regimen of immunosuppressive drugs after kidney transplantation, HCV reactivation would have taken place. Their immunosuppression relied on calcineurin inhibitors (100%), and/or steroids (62%), and/or antimetabolites (94%). An induction therapy, given to 22 patients, relied on rabbit antithymocyte globulin (59%) or anti-IL2-receptor blockers (32%). All patients had undetectable HCV RNA as ascertained by several conventional tests. At the last follow-up, no residual HCV RNA was detected in the five liver biopsies, the 26 plasma, and in the 37 nonstimulated and 24 stimulated PBMCs tested with an ultrasensitive RT-PCR assay (detection limit, 2 IU/ml). No biochemical or virologic relapse was seen during follow-up. The absence of HCV relapse in formerly HCV-infected immunocompromised patients suggests the complete eradication of HCV after its elimination while on dialysis.

Determination of the impact of hepatitis C virus on insulin resistance and arterial stiffness in hemodialysis patients

AIM

It has been shown that Hepatitis C virus (HCV) seropositivity and carotis artery plaque formation are independently correlated in the general population. Insulin resistance is also a risk factor for atherosclerosis. The association between HCV and type 2 diabetes mellitus is known. Determination of the impact of HCV on insulin resistance and arterial stiffness in hemodialysis patients would help to prevent related cardiovascular complications.

METHODS

Thirty-seven HCV(+) and 30 HCV(-) HD patients were enrolled in this study. All patients were non-diabetic. Insulin resistance was assessed by "HOMA-IR." Arterial stiffness was measured by "stiffness index b" and "elastic modulus."

RESULTS

In the HCV(+) group, there were 20 males and 17 females, while the HCV(-) group had 19 males and 11 females. The mean age was 43.4 +/- 16.7 years and 44.5 +/- 16.8 years, respectively. The HOMA-IR was 1.50 in HCV(+) group and 1.31 in HCV(-) group (p > 0.05). Stiffness index b and elastic modulus measurements revealed no difference between groups. In the HCV(+) group, arterial stiffness parameters were correlated with age, white blood cell, thrombocyte, total and LDL cholesterol, uric acid, mean arterial pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and HOMA-IR. There was no association between arterial stiffness and the above-mentioned parameters in the HCV(-) group.

CONCLUSION

We found that there was no association of arterial stiffness in HCV(+) patients with insulin resistance. Further studies with larger patient groups and more sensitive methods of detecting HCV are needed. This study is the first in literature on this issue.

HCV infection in haemodialysed patients: a role for serum IL-10 and TGF-beta1 in liver damage?

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is often clinically silent in haemodialysed (HD) patients and their immune response may modulate liver damage in HCV infection. IL-10 and TGF-beta1 could play a role in this setting as, IL-10 down-regulates hepatic fibrosis, while TGF-beta1 is a pro-fibrotic cytokine.

AIM

To evaluate the role of IL-10 and TGF-beta1 in HD/HCV+ patients.

PATIENTS

71 HD/HCV+ patients (58 with normal [HD/HCV-N] and 13 with high serum transaminases [HD/HCV-H]), 40 non-uremic patients with chronic hepatitis C (HCV+), 56 HD anti-HCV- patients and 20 healthy volunteers (H).

METHODS

IL-10 and TGF-beta1 serum levels were assessed using ELISA tests. Liver histology was assessed by Ishak's score.

RESULTS

IL-10 serum levels were significantly higher in HD patients, both HCV+ (3.7+/-0.4 pg/ml; p<0.01) and HCV- (3.8+/-0.8 pg/ml; p<0.05) than in non-uremic HCV patients (2.3+/-0.4 pg/ml). Among the HD/HCV+ patients, IL-10 serum levels were similar in HD/HCV-N and in HD/HCV-H patients. Among the HD/HCV+ patients, IL-10 serum levels were similar in those with moderate histological damage compared to those with mild damage. TGF-beta1 serum levels were significantly lower in HD patients, both HCV+ (4.6+/-0.9 ng/ml) and HCV- (6.0+/-0.9 ng/ml) than in non-uremic HCV+ patients (8.1+/-1.1 ng/ml; p<0.001 and p<0.01, respectively), but similar to the values found in H (5.3+/-0.9 ng/ml; p=n.s.). No correlation was seen between IL-10 and TGF-beta1 serum levels in any of the groups considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients on haemodialysis treatment to have high levels of IL-10, which remain high even when patients are anti-HCV+, whereas the opposite is true of TGF-beta1. The cytokine pattern observed in HD patients is compatible with the hypothesis explaining the relatively benign evolution of HCV-related liver disease in HD patients, and has a pathophysiological role.

Hepatitis C and kidney disease

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is often associated with kidney diseases such as membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN), with and without cryoglobulinemia, membranous glomerulonephritis (MGN) or glomerulosclerosis (FSGN). The aim of our study was to determine the frequency of HCV with or without hypertransaminasemia in patients with chronic nephropathy in the predialytic phase. We tested 340 subjects with chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) from our hospital's nephrology outpatient clinic for anti-HCV antibodies. In positive subjects we tested for HCV RNA by PCR method, monitoring, for at least 4 months, common biohumoral parameters including transaminases (AST, ALT). Of the 340 subjects, 46 (13.5%) were positive for HCV RNA, and 8 of these (17%) showed constant alteration of transaminases. HBsAg was found in 8 of the total study population (2.3%), and none of these showed altered transaminases. Type II diabetes mellitus was found in 26% (12/46) of the HCV-RNA positive patients, and in only 12.5% (37/294) of the negative ones. The kidney diseases we found in the 46 HCV-RNA positive patients were: diabetic nephropathy in 11 (23.9%), MPGN in 7 (15.2%), MPGN + cryoglobulinemia in 2 (4.3%), interstitial nephropathy in 4 (8.7%), IgA mesangial GN in 3 (6.5%), hypertensive nephropathy in 2 (4.3%), focal and segmental GN in 1 (2.2%), urologic disease in 4 (8.7%), other (hematological, genetic, iatrogenic) in 3 (6.6%), unknown in 9 (19.6%). Our data show that the most frequent kidney diseases associated with HCV infection were diabetic related nephropathy and MPGN with and without cryoglobulinemia. HCV infection had a positive association with diabetes. It is interesting to note that in this study population the hepatitis C concomitant to kidney disease was unusually mild: only 4 of the 46 subjects (9%) showed clinical, biohumoral and ultrasound evidence of cirrhosis.

Prevalence of occult hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus infections in Turkish hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Although their exact prevalence is not known, HBV and HCV viral infections and occult viral hepatitis are frequent in these patients. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of occult HBV and HCV infections in maintenance hemodialysis patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and eighty-eight end-stage renal disease patients on maintenance hemodialysis (100 male, mean age 49+/-29 [16-80] years, and mean duration of hemodialysis 98+/-66 [12-228] months) were enrolled in this study. Serological markers for HBV and HCV were determined with immunoenzymatic assay (ELISA) by using commercial diagnostic kits (Access and BioRad, Beckman-Coulter). HCV-RNA (Cobas Amplicor HCV kit) and HBV-DNA (Artus GmbH HBV kit) were determined quantitatively by polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

Among the patients screened, 25 (13.3%) had HBV infection alone and 38 (20.2%) had HCV infection alone, while seven (3.7%) had dual infection of both viruses. Serological markers for occult hepatitis B and occult hepatitis C were positive in five (2.7%) and nine (4.8%) of the patients, respectively. Isolated anti-HBc was positive in 12 (6.4%) of all patients, three (7.9%) of the patients with anti-HCV and two (40%) of the patients with occult hepatitis B. Isolated anti-HBc positivity was more frequent in patients with occult hepatitis B than in those without (40% [2/5] vs. 5.5% [10/183], p=0.002). None of the patients with HCV had occult hepatitis B.

CONCLUSIONS

Both occult and non-occult forms of HCV infection are more prevalent than HBV infection in hemodialysis patients. Especially the patients with isolated anti-HBc positivity should be tested for probable occult hepatitis B infection.

Gamma glutamyltranspeptidase activity and viral hepatitis in dialysis population

BACKGROUND

Numerous investigations have reported that viral hepatitis is associated with significant hepatocellular damage, as expressed by raised aminotransferases in serum, in dialysis population. However, scarce information exists on the activity of gamma glutamyltranspeptidase (GGTP) in dialysis patients with infection by hepatotropic viruses.

OBJECTIVES

We measured serum GGTP values in a large cohort (n=757) of patients receiving long-term dialysis; healthy controls were also included. The relationship between GGTP values and a series of demographic, clinical, and biochemical parameters was analyzed.

METHODS

Serum GGTP levels were tested by spectrophotometry. A subset (n=333) of dialysis patients was tested by molecular technology (branched-chain DNA (bDNA) assay) to evaluate the relationship between serum GGTP and HCV viremia. A subgroup (n=78) of dialysis patients was analyzed by an ultrasound scan of gallbladder and biliary tract to assess the presence of gallstone disease. Multivariate analyses were made using regression models; serum GGTP values were included as a dependent variable. The usefulness of serum GGTP levels in detecting HBsAg and anti-HCV positivity was evaluated using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis showed that serum GGTP levels were significantly higher in HBsAg positive and/or anti-HCV positive patients than in HBsAg negative/anti-HCV negative patients on dialysis; 85.1+/-184.1 versus 25.86+/-23.9 IU/l (P=0.0001). The frequency of raised GGTP levels was 22.2% (41/184) among dialysis patients with chronic viral hepatitis. Multivariate analysis showed a significant and independent association between serum GGTP values and positive HBsAg (P=0.005) and anti-HCV antibody (P=0.0001) status. Mean GGTP values were significantly higher in study patients than controls, 32.32+/-60.02 versus 23.5+/-16.92 IU/L (P=0.01); however, no significant difference with regard to GGTP between study and healthy cohorts persisted after correction for age, gender, race, and viral markers. No relationship between gallstone disease and serum GGTP was found (NS). An independent and significant association (P=0.0291) between raised GGTP levels and detectable HCV RNA in serum was noted among patients tested by biology molecular techniques. ROC technology demonstrated that GGTP was equally useful for detecting HBV (P=0.0004) and HCV (P=0.0005) among dialysis patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We found an independent and significant association between serum GGTP values and HBsAg and/or anti-HCV antibody in dialysis population. Twenty-two percent of dialysis patients with chronic viral hepatitis had elevated GGTP. No difference in GGTP between HBsAg- negative/anti-HCV- negative dialysis patients and healthy individuals was found. Routine testing for serum GGTP levels to assess liver disease induced by hepatotropic viruses or other agents in dialysis population is suggested.

Treatment of hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) after renal transplantation: implications for HCV-positive dialysis patients awaiting a kidney transplant

Patient survival is significantly lower in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive compared to HCV-negative dialysis patients. After renal transplantation, immunosuppressive therapy can result in an increased burden of HCV viremia. Both patient and graft survivals are lower in HCV-positive compared to matched HCV-negative renal-transplant patients. Therefore, it is important to treat HCV infection. At present, after renal transplantation, there is no current safe and efficient therapy. Alpha-interferon (alpha-IFN) does not give a sustained virological response, and is associated with a high rate of renal failure. Ribavirin and amantadine monotherapies are associated with a significant improvement in liver enzymes, but have no impact upon HCV viremia. Ribavirin, however, may be indicated in cases of HCV-related glomerulopathy because it can significantly decrease proteinuria. The combined use of alpha-IFN and ribavirin should only be given to those patients who have developed posttransplant fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis. Therefore, HCV infection needs to be treated pretransplant. In dialysis patients, the only recommended therapy, as yet, is alpha-IFN monotherapy. Pegylated alpha-IFN is under evaluation and ribavirin is contraindicated because it results in severe hemolytic anemia. Twelve months of alpha-IFN therapy results in sustained virological clearance in approximately 40% of patients, regardless of their genotype. HCV RNA, after three months of alpha-IFN therapy, is a predictive factor for a long-term sustained response. Finally, when HCV-positive dialysis patients with a sustained virological response undergo successful renal transplantation, very few suffer a virological relapse, thus emphasizing that these patients were cured.

Seroprevalence of hepatitis C virus infection and evaluation of serum aminotransferase levels among haemodialysis patients in Izmir, Turkey

The seroprevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection was investigated among haemodialysis (HD) patients. Mean serum aminotransferase levels were also compared over 3 months in HCV-seropositive patients with and without viraemia, as well as in HCV-seronegative HD patients and HCV-seropositive, non-uraemic, viraemic patients. Seroprevalence of HCV infection was 19% among the 437 HD patients tested. Of the 61 HD HCV-seropositive, hepatotoxic medication- and alcohol-free patients, 38 (62%) were found to be viraemic, using quantitative HCV-RNA, on at least one occasion. Mean serum aminotransferase levels were significantly higher in viraemic HD patients (compared with non-viraemic patients), suggesting that HCV-RNA positivity is an important predictor of increased enzyme activity in these patients. As expected, aminotransferase levels in HCV-seropositive HD patients tended to be lower than levels in HCV-seropositive non-uraemic patients.

De novo HCV infection among dialysis patients: a prospective study by HCV core antigen ELISA assay

BACKGROUND

Dialysis patients remain a high-risk group for hepatitis C virus infection. The current diagnosis of hepatitis C virus in dialysis patients includes serological measurement of anti-hepatitis C virus antibody; however, nucleic acid amplification technology for assessing hepatitis C virus viraemia is commonly used in other populations. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test for detecting antibody to hepatitis C nucleocapsid core antigen (hepatitis C virus core antigen) in human serum has been recently developed (hepatitis C virus Core Antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test). It is conceived for screening of donor blood products to significantly reduce the 'serologic window' occurring before seroconversion during acute hepatitis C virus.

AIM AND METHODS

A cohort (n = 72) of patients on maintenance haemodialysis in a single unit in the years 2000-2003 was included. Study patients were tested monthly by hepatitis C virus Core Antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in a prospective, clinical trial. Routine results obtained by hepatitis C virus Core Antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test were confirmed by assessing hepatitis C virus viraemia by branched-chain DNA (bDNA) signal amplification assay.

RESULTS

De novo hepatitis C virus infection was identified in three patients during the study period; the hepatitis C virus incidence was 1.38% (95% confidence intervals, 1.31-4.09) per year. In each patient, hepatitis C virus core antigen testing allowed the serological identification of acute hepatitis C virus before anti-hepatitis C virus seroconversion. Hepatitis C virus RNA testing confirmed the results obtained by hepatitis C virus Core Antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in all cases. The time from initial hepatitis C virus detection by hepatitis C virus Core Antigen Assay and anti-hepatitis C virus seroconversion was not greater than four weeks. Two (67%) of three patients with de novo hepatitis C virus acquisition were HBsAg negative; both these patients underwent an initial phase of hepatitis C virus viraemia that was associated with an increase in alanine aminotransferase activity and preceded the seroconversion to anti-hepatitis C virus antibody. Nosocomial transmission of hepatitis C virus between haemodialysis patients was implicated in at least two (67%) of these three patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Serological testing for hepatitis C virus core antigen can identify acute hepatitis C virus infection before anti-hepatitis C virus seroconversion. The time from initial hepatitis C virus detection by hepatitis C virus core antigen assay and anti-hepatitis C virus seroconversion was not >4 weeks. De novo acquisition of hepatitis C virus in haemodialysis was associated with a rise in alanine aminotransferase levels. Hepatitis C virus core antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test results can be obtained in routine laboratories without the need of special equipment or training. Hepatitis C virus core antigen testing among anti-hepatitis C virus negative patients on maintenance dialysis is suggested in order to early assess de novo hepatitis C virus within dialysis units.

Hepatitis E virus antibodies in hemodialysis patients: an epidemiological survey in central Greece

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is the causative agent for enteric non-A, non-B hepatitis. Transmission is mainly via the fecal-oral route but the possibility of an additional parenteric transmission has been raised. Patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis (HD) have an increased risk of exposure to blood transmitted agents. Previous studies concerning prevalence of antibodies to HEV (anti-HEV) among HD patients gave conflicting results. The aim of the study presented here was to determine the prevalence of anti-HEV among HD patients of a well-defined semi-rural region in central Greece (Thessalia region). All patients (n=351, 234 males, mean age 60+/-14 years) who were being treated in the HD units of central Greece (n=5) during 2001 were tested for anti-HEV antibody. Two commercially available specific solid-phase enzyme-linked immunoassays were applied for anti-HEV detection. Hepatitis B virus markers, antibodies to HCV, HIV and HTLV were also screened in all patients by commercially available assays. Serum aminotransferase (AST, ALT) levels were measured by spectrophotometry. 17 anti-HEV-positive patients were found and prevalence was 4.8%, varying from 1.8 - 9.8% in the various HD units. Prevalence of HBsAg and anti-HCV was 5.7% (2.9 - 15%) and 23.6% (11.5 - 36.2%) respectively. The anti-HEV prevalence was increased compared to healthy blood donors in Greece (0.26%, p < 0.01). The highest prevalence of anti-HEV was seen at the HD unit of the General Hospital of Karditsa (9.8%). Risk factors for anti-HEV antibody were not identified: no association was found between anti-HEV positivity and age or sex, duration of HD, hepatitis B or C virus infection markers, previously elevated aminotransferase levels or history of transfusion. Our investigation of HEV infection in the cohort of HD patients in central Greece showed that the prevalence of anti-HEV was greater than in healthy blood donors. There was no association to blood borne infections (HBV, HCV). The high prevalence of anti-HEV we found in one HD unit was probably related to a local infection in the past. However, long-term prospective studies are needed in an attempt to identify whether intra-unit factors are also responsible for the increased prevalence of serologic markers of HEV infection among HD patients.

Influence of hepatitis B virus virema upon serum aminotransferase activity in dialysis population

BACKGROUND

The control of the spread of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection within dialysis units has been one of the major advances in the management of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, clinical and biochemical expression of HBV in dialysis patients have not been adequately addressed. Elevated values of serum aminotransferase activity are a sensitive measure of hepatocellular injury, but the role of HBV infection in the development of liver disease among dialysis patients has not been adequately analysed. Also, the clinical impact related to the virological characteristics of HBV in dialysis has not been evaluated.

METHODS

Demographic, biochemical and virological data from 727 patients undergoing chronic dialysis in seven dialysis units in northern Italy were collected in order to assess the biochemical consequences related to the presence of HBV infection in this population. We have measured by RT-PCR technology the titers of HBV viremia in HBsAg positive patients receiving dialysis.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis showed that AST and ALT values were significantly higher in HBsAg positive/HBV DNA positive than HBsAg negative patients on dialysis; AST, 22.86+/-31.34 vs. 14.19+/-9.7 IU/L (P=0.00001); and ALT, 25.07+/-41.59 vs. 13.9+/-41.59 IU/L (P=0.00001). In the subgroup of HBsAg positive patients, the frequency of detectable HBeAg in serum was 14.9% (7/47). The median value of HBV DNA in patients with detectable HBV DNA in serum was 2.160 x 10(3) copies/mL (range, 2.5 x 10(2)-4 x 10(6) copies/mL). HBsAg positive/HCV positive patients had higher aminotransferase activity than other subgroups (P=0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed a significant and independent association between detectable HBsAg/HBV DNA in serum and AST (P=0.00001) and ALT (P=0.0001) activity AST and ALT levels were lower in dialysis than healthy individuals--this finding persisted in age- and gender-matched comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

The HBV viral load in HBsAg positive patients receiving maintenance dialysis is not high. HBsAg positivity with detectable HBV DNA in serum is a strong and independent predictor of raised aminotransferase activity among dialysis patients. HBsAg positive patients had greater aminotransferase activity than HBsAg negative individuals even if both the groups had mean aminotransferase levels within the normal range considered for healthy population. Clinical trials aimed at identifying the best cut-off value to enhance the diagnostic yield of AST/ALT for detecting HBV in dialysis population are under way.

Elevation of blood thioredoxin in hemodialysis patients with hepatitis C virus infection

BACKGROUND

Thioredoxin (TRX) is a stress-inducible thiol-containing protein, which has been shown to be an indicator of oxidative stress in a variety of diseases. The association between oxidative stress and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, however, remains unknown in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

We measured serum TRX levels in 85 hemodialysis patients positive for anti-HCV antibodies (age, 60 +/- 1 years old; hemodialysis duration, 17 +/- 1 years; M/F = 57/28) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and examined whether blood TRX may be associated with HCV-related hepatic injury.

RESULTS

Serum TRX was significantly higher in hemodialysis patients with HCV infection (112.3 +/- 3.7 ng/mL, N = 85) than in those without HCV infection (69.7 +/- 3.3 ng/mL, N = 59) (age, 69 +/- 2 years old; hemodialysis duration, 6 +/- 1 years; M/F = 32/27, P < 0.01) or normal subjects (28.0 +/- 5.4 ng/mL, N = 9). TRX was significantly correlated with time on hemodialysis (r = 0.27, P = 0.01) in HCV-positive patients, while it was associated with the patient's age in HCV-negative patients (r = 0.42, P < 0.01). Blood TRX was significantly correlated with asparate aminotransferase in patients with HCV infection (r = 0.34, P < 0.01) and without HCV infection (r = 0.46, P < 0.01). However, serum TRX was not associated with blood alanine aminotransferase, a relatively specific marker of hepatic cellular damage, in HCV-infected hemodialysis patients. A significant relationship was found between serum ferritin and TRX (r = 0.25, P = 0.02) and malondialdehyde (MDA) values (r = 0.25, P = 002) in HCV-positive patients. Serum TRX was also higher in the patients receiving weekly iron supplement with HCV infection (135.3 +/- 10.2 ng/mL vs. 110.2 +/- 3.9 ng/mL, P = 0.06) and without HCV infection (91.8 +/- 12.1 ng/mL vs. 65.2 +/- 2.7 ng/mL, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

There was a greater increase in serum TRX in hemodialysis patients with HCV viremia than without HCV viremia. However, there may not be an association between serum TRX and HCV-related hepatic injury. TRX increased with serum ferritin in HCV-infected patients and further increased by iron infusion. These findings indicate that HCV infection and iron loading may aggravate oxidative stress in dialysis patients.

Hepatitis C virus infection in renal failure patients in the absence of anti-hepatitis C virus antibodies

The magnitude and clinical significance of Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in dialysis patients is controversial and underestimated. This study was conducted in order to evaluate the correlation between HCV replication and antibody response to HCV in dialysis patients. HCV infection in dialysis patients was evaluated over a period of 3 years and compared to HCV infection in Liver Clinic patients. Sera were collected from 310 dialysis patients and tested for anti-HCV and HCV-RNA. In addition, HCV genotype and HCV viral load were determined in HCV-RNA-positive sera. Anti-HCV was detected in 43 (14%) of the dialysis patients. Of these, 37 (86%) were HCV-RNA-positive. Among the 267 HCV-seronegative dialysis patients, 25 (9%) were found to be HCV-RNA-positive in more than one sample during the study. These patients were characterized by low viral load; at least two orders of magnitude lower than in the group of HCV-seropositives. In contrast, in the Liver Clinic patients, HCV-RNA was found exclusively in HCV-seropositive patients. Comparison of the genotype pattern in the two groups did not reveal a difference. Our results suggest that HCV infection in dialysis units may be underestimated due to cases of low viral load, depending on the method of RNA extraction and sensitivity of the test used. Low viral load might contribute to the lack of humoral immune response seen in some dialysis patients.

Hepatitis C virus infection and renal transplantation

With the success of organ transplantation, liver disease has emerged as an important cause of morbidity and mortality of renal transplant (RT) recipients. Numerous studies performed during the 1990s have shown that hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the leading cause of chronic liver disease among RT recipients. The transmission of HCV by renal transplantation of a kidney from an HCV-infected organ donor has been shown unequivocally. Liver biopsy is essential in the evaluation of liver disease of RT recipients, and histological studies have shown that HCV-related liver disease after renal transplantation is progressive. The outcome of HCV-related liver disease is probably more aggressive in RT recipients than immunocompetent individuals. Various factors can affect the progression of HCV in the RT population: coinfection with hepatitis B virus, time of HCV acquisition, type of immunosuppressive treatment, and concomitant alcohol abuse. The role of virological features of HCV remains unclear. The natural history of HCV infection after renal transplantation is under evaluation; however, recent surveys with long follow-ups have documented adverse effects of HCV infection on patient and graft survival in RT recipients. Use of renal grafts from HCV-infected donors in recipients with HCV infection does not appear to result in a greater burden of liver disease, at least for a short period. The association between HCV and de novo or recurrent glomerulonephritis after RT has been hypothesized and is an area of avid research. Reported studies do not support interferon (IFN) treatment for RT recipients with chronic hepatitis C because of the frequent occurrence of graft failure, and information on the use of other types of IFN or combined therapy (IFN plus ribavirin or amantadine) is not yet available in the RT population.

Spectrum of liver damage and correlation with clinical and laboratory parameters in HCV infected hemodialysis patients

There are conflicting results in studies concerning the best marker for liver histopathological features of HCV infection in HD patients. We planned a prospective study to follow HCV viremia and laboratory parameters of HD patients and correlate these with clinic features and histopathological findings. We included 68 HCV infected patients (45 male, 23 female, age: 39.8 +/- 11.9 years, HD duration: 58.2 +/- 36.4 months) in our study. The follow-up period after the biopsy was 33.2 +/- 20.3 months. Patients liver enzyme (alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT)) levels were determined monthly and ferritin levels every three months, and the mean value was recorded. We also screened patients for HCV RNA. During the follow-up period, 22 (32.4%) of the patients had positive RNA, 26 (38.2%) negative RNA. 20 (29.4%) had intermittent RNA positivity. The patients with high grade of portal necroinflammatory activity had significantly higher AST and ALT levels. In addition patients with high grade lobular activity had significantly shorter HD and HCV infection duration and higher AST, ALT and ferritin levels. AST levels were negatively correlated with duration of HD and HCV infection, and positively correlated with GGT and ferritin levels. Additionally, we found that ALT levels were negatively correlated with HD duration and positively correlated with GGT levels. ALT levels higher than 30 U/L were reflected necroinflammatory activity more significantly than levels higher than 40 U/L. Cirrhosis was detected in 5.9% of the patients, and we could not find any laboratory parameter that was correlated with stage of fibrosis. Although there is a high degree of liver involvement, cirrhosis is a relatively less frequent finding in HD patients. Serum aminotransferases and ferritin levels but not the pattern of HCV viremia are predictors of necroinflammatory activity in liver biopsy specimens. Liver biopsy obligatory to assess the disease activity in HD patients.

Hepatitis C screening strategies in hemodialysis patients

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis, with an estimated yearly incidence of 0.2% and prevalence between 8% and 10%. Although a screening strategy based on alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values is currently recommended, this strategy has not been evaluated for cost-effectiveness compared with other potential screening strategies. A comparison therefore was made using a decision-analysis model of a simulated cohort of 5,000 hemodialysis patients followed up for 5 years. Using direct medical costs, three strategies were evaluated, including: (1) ALT values with confirmatory testing (biochemical), (2) serial enzyme-linked immunosorbent and strip immunoblot assay testing (serological), and (3) polymerase chain reaction (viral). Under baseline assumptions, the per-patient cost of screening hemodialysis patients for HCV was $378 for biochemical-based testing, $195 for serological-based testing, and $696 for viral-based testing. Our model was robust when varying the costs of testing, as well as the incidence and prevalence of HCV infection. Results of sensitivity analysis by varying costs, HCV incidence, and HCV prevalence indicated that serological-based screening was less costly than biochemical testing. Biochemical testing was in turn less costly than viral-based screening. Serological-based testing was also more effective in the diagnosis of de novo HCV infection, with a likelihood ratio of 85, in contrast to the likelihood ratio of 44 with biochemical-based testing using viral-based screening as the gold standard. A serological-based screening strategy is less costly and more effective than biochemical-based screening in the diagnosis of de novo HCV infection. Serological-based screening should be considered for HCV screening in hemodialysis populations.

Prognosis of anti-hepatitis C virus antibody-positive patients on regular hemodialysis therapy

The prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is high in patients who are on chronic hemodialysis, but the role of HCV infection and HCV-related liver disease in the mortality of these patients has not been shown. Therefore, we conducted a prospective cohort study of 1470 patients who were on chronic hemodialysis (17 to 89 yr old) from 16 dialysis centers in Japan. Among them, 276 patients (18.8%) were positive for anti-HCV antibodies and 1194 patients were negative. The patients were followed for 6 yr from 1993 to 1999. Only one case, a patient from the anti-HCV-antibody-positive group, was lost to the follow-up during this period. The mortality was higher in the anti-HCV-antibody-positive group (91 of 276 patients died) than in the anti-HCV-antibody-negative group (277 of 1193 died) (33.0% versus 23.2%, P< 0.01). A Cox proportional hazard examination showed that positivity for anti-HCV antibodies was one of the risk factors for death with an adjusted relative risk of 1.57 (95% confidence interval, 1.23 to 2.00). As a cause of death, hepatocellular carcinoma and liver cirrhosis were significantly more frequent in the anti-HCV-antibody-positive patients than in the anti-HCV-antibody-negative patients (5.5% versus 0.0%, P< 0.001; 8.8% versus 0.4%, P< 0.001, respectively). These findings show that the mortality is increased in anti-HCV-antibody-positive patients who are on chronic hemodialysis. Hepatocellular carcinoma and liver cirrhosis are factors that may influence the mortality.