Sulphasalazine therapy in ankylosing spondylitis: its effect on disease activity, immunoglobulin A and the complex immunoglobulin A-alpha-1-antitrypsin

Pan American League of Associations for Rheumatology recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) comprises a spectrum of chronic inflammatory manifestations affecting the axial skeleton and represents a challenge for diagnosis and treatment. Our objective was to generate a set of evidence-based recommendations for the management of axSpA for physicians, health professionals, rheumatologists and policy decision makers in Pan American League of Associations for Rheumatology (PANLAR) countries. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation-ADOLOPMENT methodology was used to adapt existing recommendations after performing an independent systematic search and synthesis of the literature to update the evidence. A working group consisting of rheumatologists, epidemiologists and patient representatives from countries within the Americas prioritized 13 topics relevant to the context of these countries for the management of axSpA. This Evidence-Based Guideline article reports 13 recommendations addressing therapeutic targets, the use of NSAIDs and glucocorticoids, treatment with DMARDs (including conventional synthetic, biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs), therapeutic failure, optimization of the use of biologic DMARDs, the use of drugs for extra-musculoskeletal manifestations of axSpA, non-pharmacological interventions and the follow-up of patients with axSpA.

Assessing the effect of interventions for axial spondyloarthritis according to the endorsed ASAS/OMERACT core outcome set: a meta-research study of trials included in Cochrane reviews

The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) has defined core sets for (i) symptom-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (SM-ARD), (ii) clinical record keeping, and (iii) disease-controlling anti-rheumatic therapy (DC-ART). These include the following domains for all three core sets: “physical function,” “pain,” “spinal mobility,” “spinal stiffness,” and “patient’s global assessment” (PGA). The core set for clinical record keeping further includes the domains “peripheral joints/entheses” and “acute phase reactants,” and the core set for DC-ART further includes the domains “fatigue” and “spine radiographs/hip radiographs.” The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) endorsed the core sets in 1998.

Using empirical evidence from axSpA trials, we investigated the efficacy (i.e., net benefit) according to the ASAS/OMERACT core outcome set for axSpA across all interventions tested in trials included in subsequent Cochrane reviews. For all continuous scales, we combined data using the standardized mean difference (SMD) to meta-analyze outcomes involving the same domains. Also, through meta-regression analysis, we examined the effect of the separate SMD measures (independent variables) on the primary endpoint (log [OR], dependent variable) across all trials.

Based on 11 eligible Cochrane reviews, from these, 85 articles were screened; we included 43 trials with 63 randomized comparisons. Mean (SD) number of ASAS/OMERACT core outcome domains measured for SM-ARD/physical therapy trials was 4.2 (1.7). Six trials assessed all proposed domains. Mean (SD) for number of core outcome domains for DC-ART trials was 5.8 (1.7). No trials assessed all nine domains. Eight trials (16%) were judged to have inadequate (i.e., high risk of) selective outcome reporting bias. The most responsible core domains for achieving success in meeting the primary objective per trial were pain, OR (95% CI) 5.19 (2.28, 11.77), and PGA, OR (95% CI) 1.87 (1.14, 3.07). In conclusion, selective outcome reporting (and “missing data”) should be reduced by encouraging the use of the endorsed ASAS/OMERACT outcome domains in clinical trials. Overall outcome reporting was good for SM-ARD/physical therapy trials and poor for DC-ART trials. Our findings suggest that both PGA and pain provide a valuable holistic construct for the assessment of improvement beyond more objective measures of spinal inflammation.

Disease Activity and Patient-Reported Health Measures in Relation to Cytokine Levels in Ankylosing Spondylitis

INTRODUCTION

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a lifelong condition where spinal inflammation causes chronic back pain and restriction of spinal function. While proinflammatory cytokines participate in the disease process, their relation with disease activity, spinal function, and quality of life is less well understood.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study of serum levels of four inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF, IL-23, and IL-17A) in AS patients not on biologics. Disease characteristics and simultaneous spinal function tests and patient-reported health measures (Bath Functional Index (BASFI), Dougados Functional Index (DFI), Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ), and routine laboratory parameters were recorded. The composite ASDAS-CRP score was used to classify disease activity as absent, low, or high.

RESULTS

In 164 AS patients (age 46 years, 70.1% males, 90.9% HLAB27 positive, ASDAS-CRP 1.8), disease activity was classified as inactive in 14%, low in 54%, and high in 31%. ASDAS-CRP correlated well with MHAQ, DFI, BASFI, and spinal mobility across patients with low and high disease activity (all p < 0.05). Cytokine levels did not correlate with ASDAS-CRP, ESR, BASFI, or spinal mobility scores and were comparable between patients with no, low, or high disease activity regardless of gender or disease duration (all p > 0.2).

CONCLUSIONS

A large proportion of AS not on biologics have active disease far into the disease course. This impacts negatively on quality of life, work ability, and spinal mobility. Serum cytokine levels are poor markers for these central disease features in AS management.

FUNDING

Abbott Norway AS and Arthritis Foundation of Western Australia.

Oral Anaerobic Bacteria in the Etiology of Ankylosing Spondylitis

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is associated with periodontitis. Anti-Porphyromonas gingivalis and anti-Prevotella intermedia antibody titers were higher in patients with spondyloarthritis than in healthy people. Sulfasalazine is an effective antibiotic treatment for AS. Moxifloxacin and rifamycin were also found to be significantly effective. The etiology hypothesis suggests that oral anaerobic bacteria such as Porphyromonas spp and Prevotella spp contribute to the disease. These bacteria have been identified in AS, and we will discuss their pathogenic properties with respect to our knowledge of the disease. Periodontal pathogens are likely to be responsible for the development of AS in genetically susceptible individuals. This finding should guide the development of more comprehensive and efficacious treatment strategies for AS.

Periodontal Pathogens are Likely to be Responsible for the Development of Ankylosing Spondylitis

The role of oral bacteria in the etiology of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is examined in this review. Periodontitis is related to AS to a significant degree, and periodontitis is significantly more prevalent in patients with AS. Anti-Pophyromonas gingivalis and anti-Prevotella intermedia antibodies titers are higher in AS patients than in healthy subjects. Eight randomized controlled trials that used sulfasalazine were reviewed. Moxifloxacin and rifamycin are significantly effective in the treatment of AS. Periodontal pathogens are likely to be responsible for the development of AS in genetically susceptible individuals. These results will guide more comprehensive and efficacious treatment strategies for AS.

Sulfasalazine for ankylosing spondylitis

BACKGROUND

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of unknown cause and affects mainly the spine, but can also affect other joints. Disease progression may result in loss of mobility and function. Sulfasalazine is a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug used in the treatment of AS. However, its efficacy remains unclear. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2005.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of sulfasalazine for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched for relevant randomized and quasi-randomized trials in any language, using the following sources: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2013, Issue 11); MEDLINE (2003 to 28 November 2013); EMBASE (2003 to 27 November 2013); CINAHL (2003 to 28 November 2013); Ovid MEDLINE data, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (28 November 2013); and the reference sections of retrieved articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We evaluated randomized and quasi-randomized trials examining the benefits and harms of sulfasalazine on AS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently reviewed unblinded trial reports according to the selection criteria. Disagreements on the inclusion of the studies were resolved, when necessary, by recourse to a third review author. The same authors independently assessed the risk of bias of included trials and entered the data extracted from the included trials. We combined results using mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) for continuous data, and risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data.We restructured outcome measures for this update based on recommendations from the editorial group. Major outcomes included: pain, Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI), Bath ankylosing spondylitis function index (BASFI), Bath ankylosing spondylitis metrology index (BASMI), radiographic progression, total number of withdrawals due to adverse events, and serious adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

We did not add any new studies to this review following the updated search. In the original review, we included 11 studies in the analysis, involving 895 participants in total. All included studies compared sulfasalazine with placebo. We judged most of the studies as low risk of bias or unclear risk of bias in five domains (random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of outcome assessment, selective reporting, and other sources of bias). However, for incomplete outcome data, we only judged one trial at low risk of bias.None of the included trials assessed BASDAI, BASFI, BASMI or radiographic progression. Different parameters were used to assess pain. The pooled MD for back pain measured on a 0 to 100 mm visual analogue scale was -2.96 (95% confidence interval (CI) -6.33 to 0.41; absolute risk difference 3%, 95% CI 1% to 6%; 6 trials). Compared to placebo, a significantly higher rate of withdrawals due to adverse effects (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.15; absolute risk difference 4%, 95% CI 0.4% to 8.8%; 11 trials) was found in the sulfasalazine group. A serious adverse reaction was reported in one patient taking sulfasalazine (Peto odds ratio 7.50, 95% CI 0.15 to 378.16).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is not enough evidence to support any benefit of sulfasalazine in reducing pain, disease activity, radiographic progression, or improving physical function and spinal mobility in the treatment of AS. A statistically significant benefit in reducing the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and easing spinal stiffness was mentioned in the previous version. However, the effect size was very small and not clinically meaningful. More withdrawals because of side effects occurred with sulfasalazine. Further studies, with larger sample sizes, longer duration, and using validated outcome measures are needed to verify the uncertainty of sulfasalazine in AS.

Survival of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs used as the first antirheumatic medication in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis in Finland. A nationwide population-based register study

The tight national drug reimbursement regulations in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in Finland lead to the practice that at least one traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD), if not contraindicated, has been tried and has failed before a patient can be eligible for reimbursement of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) treatment. The aim of the present study is to evaluate drug survival of the firstly prescribed DMARDs in patients with AS. All AS patients from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2007 were collected from the nationwide drug reimbursement registry maintained by the Social Insurance Institution (SII). Data on antirheumatic medication came from the prescription registry of SII. A total of 2,890 AS patients (60 % males) were identified. Sulfasalazine (SSA) monotherapy was the most common first antirheumatic treatment (2,319 patients, 87 %), followed by methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy (230 patients, 9 %) and by hydroxychloroquine monotherapy (77 patients, 3 %). A combination of two or more DMARDs was used by 44 patients (2 %). Only seven patients (0.3 %) had biological (etanercept or adalimumab) started as the first antirheumatic drug. Median survival time of SSA monotherapy was 4.5 years (95 % CI 4.2 to 4.8) and that of MTX was 1.9 years (95 % CI 1.5 to 2.1). SSA is almost the standard as the first antirheumatic treatment of AS in Finland. Although the clinical efficiency of SSA was not evaluable in the present study, these data suggest that the use of SSA can at least postpone the need and start of TNF inhibitors with marked economic consequences.

Effects of etanercept versus sulfasalazine in early axial spondyloarthritis on active inflammatory lesions as detected by whole-body MRI (ESTHER): a 48-week randomised controlled trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the potential of etanercept versus sulfasalazine to reduce active inflammatory lesions on whole-body MRI in active axial spondyloarthritis with a symptom duration of less than 5 years.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to etanercept (n=40) or sulfasalazine (n=36) treatment over 48 weeks. All patients showed active inflammatory lesions (bone marrow oedema) on MRI in either the sacroiliac joints or the spine. MRI was performed at weeks 0, 24 and 48 and was scored for active inflammatory lesions in sacroiliac joints and the spine including posterior segments and peripheral enthesitis by two radiologists, blinded for treatment arm and MRI time point.

RESULTS

In the etanercept group, the reduction of the sacroiliac joint score from 7.7 at baseline to 2.0 at week 48 was significantly (p=0.02) larger compared with the sulfasalazine group from 5.4 at baseline to 3.5 at week 48. A similar difference in the reduction of inflammation was found in the spine from 2.2 to 1.0 in the etanercept group versus from 1.4 to 1.3 in the sulfasalazine group between baseline and week 48, respectively (p=0.01). The number of enthesitic sites also improved significantly from 26 to 11 in the etanercept group versus 24 to 26 in the sulfasalazine group (p=0.04 for difference). 50% of patients reached clinical remission in the etanercept group versus 19% in the sulfasalazine group at week 48.

CONCLUSION

In patients with early axial spondyloarthritis active inflammatory lesions detected by whole-body MRI improved significantly more in etanercept versus sulfasalazine-treated patients. This effect correlated with a good clinical response in the etanercept group.

Increased expression of carbonic anhydrase I in the synovium of patients with ankylosing spondylitis

Background

One of the most distinctive features of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is new bone formation and bone resorption at sites of chronic inflammation. Previous studies have indicated that the hyperplasia and inflammation of synovial tissues are significantly related to the pathogenic process of AS. The present study used a proteomic approach to identify novel AS-specific proteins by simultaneously comparing the expression profiles of synovial membranes from patients with AS, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods

Synovial tissues were collected from the hip joints of patients with AS and knee joints of patients with RA or OA (n = 10 for each disease) during joint replacement surgery. Proteins extracted from the synovial tissues were separated by 2-D electrophoresis (2-DE), and the proteins with significantly increased expression in the AS samples were subjected to MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS analysis. The results were verified using western blotting and immunohistochemistry. Levels of the candidate proteins in synovial fluids from knee joints (n = 40 for each disease) were measured using ELISA.

Results

The proteomic approach revealed significantly increased expression of carbonic anhydrase I (CA1) in the synovial membrane of patients with AS as compared with the RA and OA tissue samples. Immunohistochemistry and western blotting analysis confirmed the findings described above. The ELISA detected a higher level of CA1 in synovial fluids from patients with AS than those with OA. The mean value of the CA1 level was also higher in AS patients as compared with RA patients. This study also detected increased expression of alpha-1-antitrypsin in the synovial tissues from AS patients, which is in agreement with other reports.

Conclusion

In vitro experiments by other groups indicated that CA1 catalyzes the generation of HCO₃^- through the hydration of CO₂, which then combines with Ca²⁺ to form a CaCO3 precipitate. Calcification is an essential step of bone formation. Substantial evidence indicates that carbonic anhydrase also stimulates bone resorption. Hence, overexpression of CA1 in the synovial tissues of AS patients may promote improper calcification and bone resorption in AS.

A systematic MEDLINE analysis of therapeutic approaches in ankylosing spondylitis

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory disorder involving the sacroiliac joints (SIJs), spine and less frequently the peripheral joints. Traditionally, it is well recognised that AS is a challenging disease to manage due to the lack of effective therapeutic options. Current evidence would suggest this has changed and there are now a number of therapies available that provide persistent control of inflammatory symptoms with improvement in daily function. NSAIDs remain the first step in patient treatment. Sulphasalazine may be effective in peripheral arthritis and there are emerging data to support its use in early inflammatory back pain. Studies have shown that pamidronate and steroid injection into SIJ have a symptom-modifying effect in AS. Current data suggest that anti-TNF treatment promises early benefit which is likely to continue in the longer term. Treatment with biologics should be considered sooner rather than later in the management of AS.

Treatment of ankylosing spondylitis with moxifloxacin

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B27-associated chronic inflammatory disease of unknown etiology. There are few effective treatments for ankylosing spondylitis, which causes substantial morbidity. The relationship between AS and enterobacteria, especially Klebsiella pneumoniae, has been reported from several groups in several countries. We performed an open-label trial of moxifloxacin, a fluoroquinolone antibiotic, in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Treatment with moxifloxacin resulted in significant and sustained improvement. At 12 weeks, patients treated with moxifloxacin had significantly greater improvement in primary outcome measures (P < 0.001). The moxifloxacin group also had significantly greater improvement in many of the secondary outcome measures (P < 0.001). In this twelve-week trial, moxifloxacin was safe, well tolerated, and associated with improvement in the inflammatory symptoms of AS.

Acute-phase response, clinical measures and disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVE

The evaluation of disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is sometimes difficult. In this study we assessed acute-phase reactants (APR) and immune response status (humoral and cellular) in active and inactive untreated AS patients categorized according to different activation/remission criteria.

METHODS

Patients with AS were categorized into three groups as active and inactive according to ASsessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) International Working Group remission/partial remission criteria, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) less than 4 or equal or more than 4 and peripheral joint involvement present or absent. Health Assessment Questionnaire-Spondyloarthropathies (HAQ-S), Daugados Articular Index and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index were performed. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), immunoglobulin A, G and M, and complements C3 and C4, interferon-gamma, interleukin-4 and alpha-1-antitrypsin (AAT), alpha-2-macroglobulin, ceruloplasmin, haptoglobin, and transferrin were measured. Immunophenotypic analysis by flow cytometry was performed (CD45, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD4+/CD8+ T cell ratio, CD19, CD16, CD56, CD23, CD25 and CD30 were assayed).

RESULTS

Patients with peripheral involvement had higher ESR and CRP levels. According to ASAS criteria patients in remission had significantly lower values of disease activity and functional limitation measures, and AAT was the only APR significantly lower in remission/partial remission group. Lymphocyte subpopulations did not show significant correlation with clinical parameters or APR.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed weak a relation between APR and disease activity in AS; however, APR should not be disregarded in the evaluation of disease and/or response to the treatment, which was supported by the new research on biologic agents infliximab and etanercept in AS. The ASAS remission/partial remission criteria may discriminate patients' clinical activity status and AAT may be a good indicator of disease activity in AS.

Oral and salivary parameters in patients with rheumatic diseases

We studied the presence of secondary Sjögren's syndrome (SS) and the composition of saliva, prevalence of oral pathogens, periodontitis, mouth mucosa, and teeth in patients with various rheumatic diseases and in healthy controls. The hypothesis was that different rheumatic diseases might cause differences in oral health characteristics because of the liability of secondary SS in the patients. The study involved 77 patients and 77 age-matched and sex-matched controls. Twenty patients were suffering from spondylarthropathy (SPA), 18 from ankylosing spondylitis (AS), 24 from rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and 15 from mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD). Clinical and radiographic oral health status was recorded and salivary flow rates were measured. Selected salivary proteins and immunoglobulins were analysed by routine methods. Minor salivary gland biopsy samples were taken from the patients for assessment of inflammatory focus scores. Differences between patients and controls and in between the different rheumatic diseases were analysed statistically. Secondary SS was diagnosed in 39% (30/77) of the patients. A severe periodontal condition (community periodontal index of treatment needs score 3 or 4) occurred in 58% (45/77) of the rheumatic patients compared with only 26% (20/77) of the controls (p < 0.0001). The severity of focal sialadenitis (focus score) correlated significant with salivary IgA, IgG, and IgM concentrations. Salivary albumin, total protein, IgG, and IgM concentrations were higher in all patient groups than in the controls. The number of patients with low salivary flow rates was higher in all patient groups compared to controls. Oral yeast counts were significantly higher in the patients than in the controls (p < 0.001). In a subgroup analysis, patients with SS had higher values for salivary IgA and IgM than patients without SS. Dental caries and oral lactobacilli were more frequent in patients with SS, but SS was not associated with periodontitis. No major differences were noted in other salivary biochemical parameters between these two groups. Patients with rheumatic diseases, irrespective of specific diagnosis, thus had various alterations in salivary flow and composition and oral health. The findings may reflect the autoimmune inflammation of the salivary glands frequently observed in these patients.

Sulfasalazine for ankylosing spondylitis

BACKGROUND

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of unknown cause and belongs to a group of diseases known as spondyloarthropathies (SpA), which includes reactive arthritis, arthritis/spondylitis in inflammatory bowel disease, psoriatic arthritis/spondylitis and undifferentiated SpA. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been the main treatment for AS. For those refractory or intolerant to NSAIDs, the disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have been used as a second line approach. Sulfasalazine (SSZ) is the best studied DMARD in AS, but its efficacy remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of sulfasalazine for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Relevant randomised and quasi-randomised trials in any language were sought using the following sources: CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Issue 2, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to June Week 4 2003), EMBASE (1980 to 2003 Week 26), CINAHL (1982 to June Week 3 2003) and the reference section of retrieved articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We evaluated randomised and quasi-randomised trials examining the efficacy of sulfasalazine on ankylosing spondylitis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Unblinded trial reports were reviewed independently by two reviewers according to the selection criteria. Disagreements on the inclusion of the studies were resolved, where necessary, by recourse to a third reviewer. The methodological quality of included trials were independently assessed by the same reviewers on randomization, concealment, blindness (participants, care providers and outcome investigators), description of withdrawals and drop-outs and intention-to-treat analysis. The same reviewers independently entered the data extracted from the included trials, using RevMan double entry facility. Results were combined using weighted mean difference or standardised mean difference for continuous data, and relative risk for dichotomous data.

MAIN RESULTS

Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria but only eleven were included in the data analysis. The pooled analysis showed that the difference between intervention groups was significant only in erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (WMD -4.79, 95% CI -8.80 to -0.78) mm/h) and morning stiffness VAS-100 mm (visual analogue scale 100 mm, where 0 = no stiffness and 100 = severe) (WMD -13.89, 95% CI -22.54 to -5.24), favouring SSZ over placebo. The trial with the largest sample (Clegg 1996) and that with the longest treatment duration (Kirwan 1993) had similar results. Both trials found that SSZ showed evidence of benefit in the occurrence of peripheral joint symptoms and peripheral responses in patients with peripheral arthritis. Nissila 1988 is the only trial in which SSZ showed benefit in primary outcome analyses, including back pain, chest expansion, occiput-to-wall test and patient's general well being. Compared with other trials, the patients in this trial had the shortest disease duration and the highest level of baseline ESR and contained the greatest proportion of patients with peripheral arthritis. Significantly more withdrawals for side effects (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.15, NNH 23, 95% CI 10 to 288) and for any reason (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.73, NNH 17, 95% CI 8 to 180) were found in SSZ compared with placebo group although severe side effects were rare (1 of the 469 patients taking SSZ).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Across all AS patients, SSZ demonstrated some benefit in reducing ESR and easing morning stiffness, but no evidence of benefit in physical function, pain, spinal mobility, enthesitis, patient and physician global assessment. Patients at early disease stage, with higher level of ESR (or active disease) and peripheral arthritis might benefit from SSZ.

Oxidation of alpha1-proteinase inhibitor by the myeloperoxidase-hydrogen peroxidase system promotes binding to immunoglobulin A

We have demonstrated previously that patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) show an increase in serum and synovial fluid levels of complexes between alpha1-proteinase inhibitor (alpha1PI) and IgA. These are believed to form through disulfide binding between the Cys232 residue on alpha1PI and the penultimate cysteine residue (Cys471) of the IgA alpha chain. The mechanism for this has not been elucidated. We show here that alpha1PI oxidized by the myeloperoxidase-hydrogen peroxide (MPO-H2O2) system promotes the formation of IgA-alpha1PI complexes when incubated with IgA and that such complexes have no inhibitory activity against porcine pancreatic elastase (PPE). The activity of alpha1PI was considerably reduced also in IgA-alpha1PI complexes isolated from serum of an RA patient. We suggest that formation of IgA-alpha1PI complexes in inflammation may involve oxidation of alpha1PI, and as a consequence the alpha1PI in such complexes has reduced elastase inhibitory activity.

Prognosis, course of disease, and treatment of the spondyloarthropathies

Prognosis in the majority of patients with acute reactive arthritis is usually good, with most patients recovering in a few months. In about 15% to 30% of such patients, the disease progresses, and spondyloarthropathy and even ankylosing spondylitis develop in the following 10 to 20 years. A recurrent attack of reactive arthritis is common in patients with chlamydia-triggered arthritis, but it is rare in patients who have had enteroarthritis. In patients with chronic spondyloarthropathy without evidence of preceding infection, the disease can progress slowly into ankylosing spondylitis. When reactive chlamydia arthritis is indicated, a prolonged course of antibiotics is needed. For other forms of reactive arthritis, solid evidence in favor of antibiotic therapy is still lacking. Presence of hip pain, decreased mobility of thoracic cervical or thoracic spine, heel pain, inflammatory gut lesions, high erythrocyte sedimentation rate, positive family history, and presence of human leukocyte antigen B27 are indicators for chronicity. Sulfasalazine might be of use in chronic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis, especially if the patient has peripheral arthritis.

The effect of methotrexate and azathioprine on the serum levels of IgA-alpha 1-antitrypsin complex in juvenile chronic arthritis

In the present study we investigated the influence of methotrexate (MTX) and azathioprine (AZA) on the serum levels of the IgA-alpha 1-antitrypsin (IgA-AT) complex in patients with the systemic form of juvenile chronic arthritis (JCA). Fifty-six JCA patients (22 treated with MTX, 18 treated with AZA, and 16 not treated with any immunosuppressive agent) were enrolled in the study. MTX dosage ranged from 0.3 to 0.5 mg/kg-1 week-1, while AZA was given daily at an average dose of 1 mg/kg. MTX was given for 13 months (SD = 7 months) whereas AZA for 11 months (SD = 6 months). The average value of the complex was higher in JCA patients than in both control groups (0.74 +/- 0.73 U vs 0.37 +/- 0.13 U (control children), P < 0.001 and vs 0.23 +/- 0.12 U (control adults), P < 0.001). Values exceeding the normal range were found in twenty-two JCA patients (39.4%). Serum IgA-AT level was lowest in the MTX group compared to AZA and non-treated patients (0.56 +/- 0.24 U, 0.76 = 0.43 U, 0.95 +/- 0.52 U, respectively, P < 0.05). IgA values exceeding normal levels for age were found in 14% of the patients. A correlation between the levels of the IgA-AT complex and C-reactive protein (r = 0.43, P < 0.01), alpha 1-acid-glycoprotein (r = 0.45, P < 0.01), alpha 1-antichymotrypsin (r = 0.52, P < 0.01), alpha 1-antitrypsin (r = 0.40, P < 0.01) and IgA (r = 0.56, P < 0.01) was established.

Comparison of sulfasalazine and placebo in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. A Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether sulfasalazine (SSZ) at a dosage of 2,000 mg/day is effective for the treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) that is not controlled with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug therapy.

METHODS

Two hundred sixty-four patients with AS were recruited from 15 clinics, randomized (double-blind) to SSZ or placebo treatment, and followed up for 36 weeks. Treatment response was based on morning stiffness, back pain, and physician and patient global assessments.

RESULTS

While longitudinal analysis revealed a trend favoring SSZ in the middle of treatment, no difference was seen at the end of treatment. Response rates were 38.2% for SSZ and 36.1% for placebo (P = 0.73). The Westergren erythrocyte sedimentation rate declined more with SSZ treatment than with placebo (P < 0.0001). AS patients with associated peripheral arthritis showed improvement that favored SSZ (P = 0.02). Adverse reactions were fewer than expected and were mainly due to nonspecific gastrointestinal complaints.

CONCLUSION

SSZ at a dosage of 2,000 mg/day does not seem to be more effective than placebo in the treatment of AS patients with chronic, longstanding disease. SSZ is well tolerated and may be more effective than placebo in the treatment of AS patients with peripheral joint involvement. This effect is more pronounced in treatment of the peripheral arthritis in this subgroup of AS patients.

Which is the active moiety of sulfasalazine in ankylosing spondylitis? A randomized, controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of sulfasalazine (SSZ) with its two moieties, 5-aminosalicylic acid (ASA) and sulfapyridine (SP), in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

METHODS

A 26-week randomized, observer-blinded, 2-center, controlled study of treatment with either SSZ, ASA, or SP was conducted in 90 patients with active AS. Patients were evaluated at baseline and at monthly intervals, using several clinical and laboratory measures of disease activity. A global assessment of treatment efficacy was made by both patients and observers at the end of the study period.

RESULTS

There were no significant changes in any of the parameters of disease activity in the ASA treatment group. Levels of serum IgG, IgA, and IgM fell significantly during treatment with SP, but none of the other changes reached statistical significance. Plasma viscosity and IgG and IgA levels fell significantly during treatment with SSZ, as did nocturnal spinal pain and overall spinal pain. Patients and observers reported a favorable outcome after treatment with SSZ or SP significantly more often than with ASA treatment.

CONCLUSION

SP appears to be the active moiety in AS, although there was a trend suggesting a better outcome in the SSZ group compared with the SP group, perhaps suggesting the importance of a common sulfonamide structure for efficacy.

IgA-alpha-1-antitrypsin complex in systemic lupus erythematosus: preliminary report

To investigate the role of the complex IgA-alpha-1-antitrypsin (IgA-AT) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and in mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD), and its possible relations to either activity of the disease or a treatment, we examined a concentration of IgA-AT complex in 65 SLE and 9 MCTD sera. Complex IgA-AT was evaluated using a double antibody enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA). Twenty nine patients with SLE (44.6%) and three patients with MCTD (33.3%) had increased serum IgA-AT levels. The mean values of IgA-AT complex in patients with SLE and MCTD were higher than in healthy controls. Among the SLE group, patients with current neurological manifestation were characterized by an increase in IgA-AT serum concentration (2.45 +/- 2.07 U vs. 0.78 +/- 0.70 U, P < 0.001). No relation was found between this complex and ESR level, C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration, or hemoglobin level. Ten SLE patients were treated with CTX intravenously. In this group of patients, IgA-AT complex level was found to be increased compared with patients without such a treatment (1.82 +/- 1.30 U vs. 0.80 +/- 0.67 U, P < 0.05). The present study provides two new observations. Firstly, IgA-AT complex is increased in SLE and MCTD compared with healthy controls, and secondly, patients with CNS involvement displayed a striking increased IgA-AT level.

Sulfasalazine in the treatment of spondylarthropathy. A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and tolerability of sulfasalazine (SSZ) in the treatment of spondylarthropathy.

METHODS

We conducted a 6-month randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter study of patients with spondylarthropathy whose disease had remained active despite treatment with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Patients were treated with SSZ (3 gm/day) or placebo. The primary efficacy variables were the physician's and patient's overall assessments, pain, and morning stiffness. End points were analyzed in the intent-to-treat and completer patient populations; the time course of effect was analyzed in the completer patient population.

RESULTS

Of the 351 patients enrolled, 263 (75%) completed the 6-month treatment period. The withdrawal rates were 35 (20%) and 53 (30%) in the placebo and SSZ groups, respectively. In the intent-to-treat analysis of end point efficacy, the between-treatment difference reached statistical significance only for 1 of the 4 primary outcome variables, the patient's overall assessment of disease activity, for which 60% of the patients taking SSZ improved by at least 1 point on a 5-point scale, in contrast to 44% of the patients taking placebo. Laboratory markers of inflammation also showed statistically significant change in favor of SSZ. In subgroup analysis, the most impressive effects were seen in patients with psoriatic arthritis, both for the 4 primary efficacy variables and for secondary efficacy variables such as the number of inflamed joints. Adverse events were more frequent in the SSZ group than the placebo group, but all were transient or reversible after cessation of treatment.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study show that SSZ had greater efficacy than placebo in the treatment of active spondylarthropathy, notably in patients with psoriatic arthritis.

Evidence for differential effects of sulphasalazine on systemic and mucosal immunity in rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To study the effects of sulphasalazine (SASP) on the systemic and mucosal humoral immune systems in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Serum concentrations of interleukin 6 (IL-6), class and subclass specific IgG, IgA and IgM, IgA and IgG antigliadin antibodies and rheumatoid factors (RF) of IgG, IgA (including IgA1 and IgA2 subclasses) and IgM isotypes were measured before and 16 weeks after sulphasalazine (SASP) therapy in 15 female and three male patients with RA. Amounts of immunoglobulins in saliva and jejunal fluid were measured as estimates of mucosal humoral immunity.

RESULTS

Serum concentrations of IgA and IgG decreased significantly during SASP therapy and correlated with reduced concentrations of IL-6. In addition, levels of circulating IgA RF, IgA anti-gliadin antibodies and IgM RF decreased significantly after the treatment. In contrast, immunoglobulin levels in saliva and jejunal fluid were unaltered.

CONCLUSION

SASP exerts powerful but selective inhibitory effects on systemic immunoglobulin production, whereas no effects on mucosal immunoglobulin production were observed. The decreased systemic B cell activity may be mediated by downregulation of the production of IL-6, a cytokine with Ig switching properties.

Does the serum level of IgA-alpha-1-antitrypsin complex correlate with radiological progression in early rheumatoid arthritis? A 3-year follow-up study

We followed the levels of serum IgA-alpha-1-antitrypsin (IgA-AT) complex in 37 patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during the first 3 years of the disease. The changes in IgA-AT were correlated with a radiological damage score (DS) of the hands assessed according to Larsen. At the onset of the disease, the IgA-AT serum concentration was significantly higher as compared to the control group (0.72 +/- 0.22 U vs 0.29 +/- 0.14 U, P < 0.01). The level significantly decreased during the 3-year observation period. The DS was significantly higher after 3 years. However, this difference was due to changes in only 11 patients; in 26 patients the DS was almost unchanged. In the group of 11 patients with radiological progression, the level of IgA-AT either remained high or increased significantly (0.95 +/- 0.18 U at the onset, 0.97 +/- 0.25 U after 3 years), whereas we observed a decrease in IgA-AT in 26 patients without radiological progression (0.63 +/- 0.16 U at the onset of the disease, 0.45 +/- 0.10 U after 3 years, P < 0.01). Moreover, a relationship between changes in IgA-AT serum level and radiological progression was shown (r = 0.60, P < 0.01). Our studies suggested that the relationship between IgA-AT level and radiological progression of the disease should be considered. We cannot exclude the possibility that the constant high level of IgA-AT may cause worsening in bone erosions.

Second-line treatment in seronegative spondylarthropathies

The literature concerning second-line treatment of seronegative spondylarethropathies from 1940 to August 1993 was reviewed. Sulfasalazine appeared to be effective in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and promising in reactive arthritis (ReA) and Reiters' syndrome (RS). Methotrexate and azathioprine were associated with a remarkable improvement in some cases of AS and RS. Methylprednisolone and levamisole were both efficacious in AS, but levamisole was associated with occasional severe side effects. Radiation therapy led to short-term improvement in AS, but was abandoned because of severe long-term side effects. Only sulfasalazine has been studied in sufficient detail to allow definitive conclusions, but methotrexate and azathioprine may be promising drugs.

[Spondylarthropathies and the IgA system]

The spondyloarthropathies (SA) implicate bacterial infections of mucosal origin. IgA synthesis capacity in vitro is normal in AS. IgA increase is secondary to a specific immune response to the bacterial antigens implicated in the disease's pathogenesis. IgA participate to immune complex formation, which may lead to some extraarticular features of the disease (e.g. renal, cutaneous or vascular). There is also an increase of secretory IgA reflecting the activation of the two compartments of this humoral immune response, part of a coherent pathophysiological scheme of the disease. In a practical point of view, IgA serum levels may be considered as a biological parameter of SA activity.

Evaluation of sulphasalazine in the treatment of spondyloarthropathies

Sulphasalazine has been shown to have an effect in patients with spondyloarthropathies, but the clinical indication for its use is controversial and its long term effect has not yet been evaluated. Treatment with sulphasalazine was analysed retrospectively in a group of 372 patients with a wide range of spondyloarthropathies to determine subsets of patients showing differential effects of the drug. One hundred and one patients received sulphasalazine at a mean daily dose of 2 g (ankylosing spondylitis, 54 patients; psoriatic arthritis, 21 patients; reactive arthritis, four patients; arthritis related to inflammatory bowel disease, six patients; undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy, 16 patients). A comparison between treated and untreated patients suggests that only patients with active and severe disease were treated whatever the precise diagnosis or the amount of axial disease in the spondyloarthropathy. After six months of treatment improvement was noted in 59 patients unrelated to their subgroup or amount of axial disease. After a mean follow up of 20 months, 37 patients were still receiving treatment, 33 had discontinued the drug because of inefficacy, 14 because of side effects, six because of remission of the disease, and 11 for other reasons. Comparison between the beginning and end of treatment showed a statistically significant decrease in morning stiffness, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and daily dose of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). It is concluded that: (a) a low percentage of patients with spondyloarthropathy have active disease requiring treatment with sulphasalazine despite the use of NSAIDs (27% in this study); (b) in this subgroup of patients sulphasalazine seems to be of clinically relevant benefit in 59%; and (c) this benefit does not seem to be correlated with either the precise diagnosis of spondyloarthropathy or the amount of axial disease.

Nanocolloid scintigraphy for rheumatic diseases of the hands

Images