Rituximab vs mycophenolate and vs cyclophosphamide pulses for induction therapy of active lupus nephritis: a clinical observational study

Expression profile of long-noncoding RNAs MIR31HG, NKILA, and PACER in systemic lupus erythematosus patients

OBJECTIVES

Growing evidence suggests that systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), an organ-damaging systemic autoimmune illness, may be influenced by long-noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs). This study aimed to assess the relative expression of lncRNAs (MIR31HG, NKILA, and PACER) in patients with SLE to evaluate their role in the disease.

DESIGN AND METHODS

This study involved 70 patients with SLE and 70 apparently healthy control subjects. The expression levels of lnc-MIR31HG, NKILA, and PACER were quantified using real-time PCR.

RESULTS

Lnc-MIR31HG, NKILA, and PACER were significantly upregulated in SLE cases compared to controls (P < 0.001). ROC curve analysis revealed a 91.43 % sensitivity of PACER for the diagnosis of SLE at a cutoff point of > 1.46, followed by NKILA with 90 % sensitivity at a cutoff point of > 1.16, and MIR31HG with 85.71 % sensitivity at a cutoff point of > 1.43. MIR31HG had the highest sensitivity for the diagnosis of lupus nephritis (86.67 %) at a cutoff point of > 7.19, then NKILA with 80 % sensitivity at a cutoff point of > 8.12, and finally PACER expression with 73.33 % sensitivity at a cutoff point of > 18.19. Moreover, MIR31HG and NKILA revealed a significant correlation with albumin/creatinine ratio, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and the SLEDAI score. Regression analysis revealed the potential roles of MIR31HG, NKILA, and PACER expression as predictors for SLE.

CONCLUSION

An upregulated lncRNA panel (MIR31HG, NKILA, and PACER) could play a role in the pathogenesis and, hence, the predispositiontoSLE. MIR31HG and NKILA can serve as prognostic markers significantly linked with disease activity.

Clinical advances in immunotherapy for immune-mediated glomerular diseases

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Due to the suboptimal therapeutic efficacy and potential adverse effects associated with traditional immunosuppressive medications, there has been an increasing emphasis on the development and utilization of immunotherapies. This paper aims to provide clinicians with valuable insights for selecting appropriate therapeutic approaches and contribute to the development of novel immunotherapeutic drugs.

MAIN BODY

This paper categorizes the immunotherapeutic drugs that are used for the treatment of immune-mediated glomerular diseases into three groups: immunotherapies targeting antigen-presenting cells (anti-CD80), immunotherapies targeting T/B cells (anti-CD20, anti-CD22, BAFF and APRIL inhibitors, CD40-CD40L inhibitors, proteasome inhibitors, Syk inhibitors, and Btk inhibitors), and immunotherapies targeting the complement system (C5 inhibitors, C5a/C5aR inhibitors, C3 inhibitors, MASP2 inhibitors, factor B inhibitors, and factor D inhibitors). The article then provides a comprehensive overview of advances related to these immunotherapeutic drugs in clinical research.

CONCLUSION

Certain immunotherapeutic drugs, such as rituximab, belimumab, and eculizumab, have exhibited notable efficacy in treating specific immune-mediated glomerular diseases, thereby providing novel therapeutic approaches for patients. Nonetheless, the efficacy of numerous immunotherapeutic drugs remains to be substantiated.

Experience with abatacept in refractory lupus nephritis

Lupus nephritis is a major cause of morbidity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Responsiveness to treatment is crucial to avoid chronic kidney disease. New molecules have been developed in recent years to improve renal survival rates. Biological therapies as coadjutant to conventional induction treatment have been tested in randomized clinical trials with heterogeneous results. Like many others biologic therapies, Abatacept has not shown a clear benefit in the context of clinical trials. We present two cases of lupus nephritis patients in whom addition of abatacept resulted in complete remission of the renal disease. The first case described a 49-year-old male with class IV lupus nephritis with nephrotic range proteinuria and high immunological activity refractory to conventional treatment with cyclophosphamide and corticosteroids and multitarget therapy with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone. Several biological therapies (rituximab, belimumab and tocilizumab) were unsuccessfully tried, so that abatacept was added to his background multitarget therapy showing complete clinical response. The second case described a 52-year-old female with class IV lupus nephritis treated initially with conventional treatment with partial response. In successive renal flares with nephrotic proteinuria, she showed intolerance to rituximab and refractoriness to voclosporin. Finally, abatacept was added to her background therapy with MMF and PDN showing complete and maintained remission of the disease. In no case the use of abatacept was associated with serious adverse events. Based on our experience, abatacept should be considered as a safe rescue therapy in patients with refractory lupus nephritis and proteinuria with nephrotic range. In addition to this case, we reviewed the use of abatacept in lupus nephritis in the literature.

Monogenic lupus: Tracing the therapeutic implications from single gene mutations

Monogenic lupus, a distinctive variant of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), is characterized by early onset, family-centric clustering, and heightened disease severity. So far, over thirty genetic variations have been identified as single-gene etiology of SLE and lupus-like phenotypes. The critical role of these gene mutations in disrupting various immune pathways is increasingly recognized. In particular, single gene mutation-driven dysfunction within the innate immunity, notably deficiencies in the complement system, impedes the degradation of free nucleic acid and immune complexes, thereby promoting activation of innate immune cells. The accumulation of these components in various tissues and organs creates a pro-inflammatory microenvironment, characterized by a surge in pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, reactive oxygen species, and type I interferons. Concurrently, single gene mutation-associated defects in the adaptive immune system give rise to the emergence of autoreactive T cells, hyperactivated B cells and plasma cells. The ensuing spectrum of cytokines and autoimmune antibodies drives systemic disease manifestations, primarily including kidney, skin and central nervous system-related phenotypes. This review provides a thorough overview of the single gene mutations and potential consequent immune dysregulations in monogenic lupus, elucidating the pathogenic mechanisms of monogenic lupus. Furthermore, it discusses the recent advances made in the therapeutic interventions for monogenic lupus.

Novel Therapeutics for Management of Lupus Nephritis: What Is Next?

Lupus nephritis is a severe, organ-threatening manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus. The current standard of care in the treatment of lupus nephritis is limited to broad-spectrum immunosuppressants, which have significant concerns of short- and long-term toxicity. With traditional approaches, kidney survival and patient outcomes have remained suboptimal. Robust research in the therapeutics of lupus nephritis has resulted in development of many novel drugs targeting specific inflammatory response pathways. Some newer agents have shown a definitive signal of benefit when added to standard of care. With the advent of precision medicine in nephrology, lupus nephritis treatment may undergo a shift toward incorporating approaches using these newer drugs and individualizing care of our patients. This review highlights major advances in management of lupus nephritis over the last 25 years and explores the ongoing trials of emerging therapies in lupus nephritis.

Current Treatment Approach, Emerging Therapies and New Horizons in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), the prototype of systemic autoimmune diseases is characterized by extreme heterogeneity with a variable clinical course. Renal involvement may be observed and affects the outcome. Hydroxychloroquine should be administered to every lupus patient irrespective of organ involvement. Conventional immunosuppressive therapy includes corticosteroids, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, cyclosporine and tacrolimus. However, despite conventional immunosuppressive treatment, flares occur and broad immunosuppression is accompanied by multiple side effects. Flare occurrence, target organ involvement, side effects of broad immunosuppression and increased knowledge of the pathogenetic mechanisms involved in SLE pathogenesis as well as the availability of biologic agents has led to the application of biologic agents in SLE management. Biologic agents targeting various pathogenetic paths have been applied. B cell targeting agents have been used successfully. Belimumab, a B cell targeting agent, has been approved for the treatment of SLE. Rituximab, an anti-CD20 targeting agent is also used in SLE. Anifrolumab, an interferon I receptor-targeting agent has beneficial effects on SLE. In conclusion, biologic treatment is applied in SLE and should be further evaluated with the aim of a good treatment response and a significant improvement in quality of life.

Biological therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus, antiphospholipid syndrome, and Sjögren's syndrome: evidence- and practice-based guidance

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), and Sjögren's syndrome (SS) are heterogeneous autoimmune diseases. Severe manifestations and refractory/intolerance to conventional immunosuppressants demand other options, namely biological drugs, and small molecules. We aimed to define evidence and practice-based guidance for the off-label use of biologics in SLE, APS, and SS. Recommendations were made by an independent expert panel, following a comprehensive literature review and two consensus rounds. The panel included 17 internal medicine experts with recognized practice in autoimmune disease management. The literature review was systematic from 2014 until 2019 and later updated by cross-reference checking and experts' input until 2021. Preliminary recommendations were drafted by working groups for each disease. A revision meeting with all experts anticipated the consensus meeting held in June 2021. All experts voted (agree, disagree, neither agree nor disagree) during two rounds, and recommendations with at least 75% agreement were approved. A total of 32 final recommendations (20 for SLE treatment, 5 for APS, and 7 for SS) were approved by the experts. These recommendations consider organ involvement, manifestations, severity, and response to previous treatments. In these three autoimmune diseases, most recommendations refer to rituximab, which aligns with the higher number of studies and clinical experience with this biological agent. Belimumab sequential treatment after rituximab may also be used in severe cases of SLE and SS. Second-line therapy with baricitinib, bortezomib, eculizumab, secukinumab, or tocilizumab can be considered in SLE-specific manifestations. These evidence and practice-based recommendations may support treatment decision and, ultimately, improve the outcome of patients living with SLE, APS, or SS.

Rituximab Dosing in Glomerular Diseases: A Scoping Review

Purpose of Review

Rituximab is increasingly prescribed for glomerular diseases. However, the recently published Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2021 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Glomerular Diseases lacks details on recommended dosing regimens for most individual glomerular diseases. We performed this scoping review summarizing the evidence for rituximab dosing in glomerular disease.

Sources of Information

PubMed database.

Methods

The PubMed search methodology was developed with a medical librarian and performed by the first, with review by a second, author. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies (PCSs) examining rituximab efficacy and/or safety in antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV), membranous nephropathy (MN), lupus nephritis (LN), or podocytopathies (minimal change disease or focal segmental glomerulosclerosis [FSGS]) were included. Fifty-three studies (14 RCTs and 39 PCSs) were included.

Key Findings

We identified 16 different rituximab dosing regimens studied as induction therapy for one or more of the 5 glomerular diseases of interest. The most frequently studied rituximab induction regimens were 1000 mg as 2 doses 2 weeks apart (17 studies, 32%) and 4 doses of 375 mg/m²/week (18 studies, 33.9%). Twenty-six studies (49%) examined rituximab as monotherapy or in conjunction with corticosteroids alone, while the remaining studies examined rituximab as part of combination immunosuppression. Adapting treatment to achieve B-cell depletion, with frequent evaluation of disease-specific biomarkers, might prove the optimal approach to achieving and maintaining remission. Rituximab might also enable steroid minimization or avoidance.

Limitations

Restriction of the search to a single database and to studies published in the English language, and with an accompanying abstract, could have led to selection bias. While the search was limited to prospective observational studies and RCTs, no formal assessment of study quality was performed.

Comparative Effectiveness of Rituximab and Common Induction Therapies for Lupus Nephritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Objective

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety (infection events) between rituximab (RTX), tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and cyclophosphamide (CYC) as induction therapies in lupus nephritis (LN).

Methods

Electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, were searched from inception up to December 9, 2021. Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to combine the direct and indirect evidence of different drugs for LN patients. The pooled relative effects were shown using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs).

Results

Nineteen studies (1,566 patients) met the inclusion criteria and were selected in the present study. The network meta-analysis reported that no statistically significant differences were found in partial remission (PR) and infection among the four drugs. RTX showed a significantly higher complete remission (CR) than MMF (OR = 2.60, 95% CrI = 1.00–7.10) and seemed to be more effective than CYC (OR = 4.20, 95% CrI = 1.70–14.00). MMF had a better CR than CYC (OR = 1.60, 95% CrI = 1.00–3.20). TAC presented a better overall response than CYC (OR = 3.70, 95% CrI = 1.20–12.00). Regarding CR and overall response, the maximum surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values were 96.94% for RTX and 80.15% for TAC. The maximum SUCRA value of infection reaction was 74.98% for RTX and the minimum value was 30.17% for TAC, respectively.

Conclusions

RTX and TAC were the most effective drugs for induction remission in LN. Among the four drugs, TAC had the lowest probability of infection, and RTX showed the highest probability of experiencing an infection. This meta-analysis could not conclude about other adverse events.

A pharmacoeconomic study comparing the use of mycophenolate mofetil or cyclophosphamide as induction therapy in lupus nephritis patients in Egypt

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a major and serious complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and is associated with morbidity and mortality. The difference in drug cost between mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and cyclophosphamide (CYC) inducing regimens becomes a relevant and realistic issue, especially in developing countries. Thus, this study aims to estimate and compare the costs and outcomes of CYC and MMF for better allocation of resources to reduce the burden on the Egyptian healthcare system.

METHODS

A prospective, parallel observational study was conducted at Kasr Al-Aini Hospital between 2018 and 2020. One hundred and twenty-two LN patients were followed up monthly during the study period. Remission and maintenance of renal remission were assessed at 6 and 12 months from the start of therapy. Total direct medical costs associated with both regimens were examined. We applied the cost-minimization analysis method from governmental perspective. Besides, a prospective evaluation of reported changes in health-related quality of life using SF-36 was included in our study.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in treatment response at 6 and 12 months (RR 0.6 [0.26;1.43] and 0.8 [0.27;2.33]), respectively, as well as the incidence of infection episodes between MMF and CYC group (71.4% versus 70.45%, p > 0.05). The average direct medical expenditures per patient in the MMF group were approximately one and half times more than the CYC group (2339.69 $ versus 1329.03 $, p <0.001).

CONCLUSION

The CYC arm was associated with lower costs than the MMF arm, with equally effective outcomes indicating that CYC is an attractive treatment option.

Initial Preserved Renal Function as a Predictor of Favorable Renal Response to Rituximab in Refractory or Relapsing Lupus Nephritis: A Single-center Cohort Study in Korea

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies investigating the beneficial effect of rituximab on lupus nephritis (LN) reported controversial results There have been few reports of renal response to rituximab according to renal function We investigated the efficacy of rituximab in refractory/relapsing LN and the role of renal function as a predictor of renal response.

METHODS

From 2016 to 2019, we retrospectively reviewed 22 patients with refractory/relapsing LN receiving rituximab Renal responses (complete and partial) at 6 and 12 months were compared between normal (glomerular filtration rate [GFR]≥90 mL/min/173 m², n=11) and decreased (GFR<90 mL/min/173 m², n=11) GFR groups Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to assess predictors of renal response.

RESULTS

At baseline, the decreased GFR group had a higher urine proteinuria to creatinine ratio (p=0008) and proportion of refractory LN (p=0010) and previous cyclophosphamide therapy (p=0035) than the normal GFR group The overall renal response rate was 455% (10 patients) at 6 months and 545% (12 patients) at 12 months Renal response rates were higher in the normal GFR group (818% and 909% at 6 and 12 months, respectively) than in the decreased GFR group (91% and 182% at 6 and 12 months, respectively; p<0001) Normal GFR and anti-La were associated with renal response to rituximab, with hazard ratios of 9256 (p=0008) and 5478 (p=0041), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Rituximab is an effective therapy for refractory/relapsing LN, particularly in patients with preserved renal function.

Efficacy and safety of an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, rituximab, for lupus nephritis: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX) for lupus nephritis are still a controversial issue.

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases for all clinical controlled studies.

RESULTS

Six studies with 588 patients were included in our meta-analysis. RTX increased total renal remission rates (TR, odds ratio [OR] 2.16, 95% CI 1.31 to 3.55, P = .003) and complete renal remission rate (CR, OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.18 to 4.94, P = .02) compared with the control group. Subgroup analyses showed that rituximab was more effective at increasing the rate of TR and CR for lupus nephritis patients compared with mycophenolate mofetil (TR, OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.29 to 16.47, P = .02; CR, OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.19 to 5.47, P = .02) and cyclophosphamide (TR, OR 2.89, 95% CI 1.31 to 6.40, P = .009; CR, OR 2.75, 95% CI 1.19 to 6.4, P = .02). Rituximab also had advantage in reducing Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index score (-2.49, 95% CI -3.77 to -1.22, P = .0001). There were no significant differences between the RTX group and control group on the change of proteinuria (-0.36 g/d, 95% CI -0.71 to -0.00 g/d, P = .05) and serum creatinine (0.13 mg/dL, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.42 mg/dL, P = .36). RTX treatment did not increase the risk of adverse events compared to the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides clear beneficial effects of RTX in patients with lupus nephritis. In addition, RTX therapy did not increase the risk of adverse events compared to the control group.

Treatment for Severe Lupus Nephritis: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in China

Background: Lupus nephritis (LN) is the most common secondary glomerular diseases that will cause end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and renal-related death. The cost-effectiveness of various treatments for LN recommended by official guidelines has not been investigated in China. Our study is to evaluate clinical prognosis and cost-effectiveness of the current treatments for severe LN. Methods: A Markov model was simulated for 1,000 LN patients of 30 years old, over a 3-years and 30-years lifetime horizon respectively. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of six therapeutic strategies from a societal perspective, with cyclophosphamide (CYC) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) induction therapy followed by CYC, MMF or azathioprine (AZA) maintenance therapy. Main outcomes included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and clinical prognosis. One and three times gross domestic product (GDP) per capita were used as the willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds. We also carried out sensitivity analysis under a lifetime horizon. Results: Compared with the baseline strategy of CYC induction and maintenance, for a 3-years horizon the most cost-effective strategy was CYC induction and AZA maintenance with $448 per QALY gained, followed by MMF induction and AZA maintenance which however was not cost-effective under the one times GDP per capita WTP threshold. For a lifetime horizon, CYC induction and AZA maintenance remained the most cost-effective strategy but MMF induction and maintenance became cost-effective under the one times GDP per capita WTP threshold and achieved a higher complete remission rate (57.2 versus 48.9%) and lower risks of ESRD (3.3 versus 5.8%) and all-cause mortality (36.0 versus 40.8%). The risk of developing ESRD during maintenance was the most influential parameter affecting ICER. Conclusions: The strategy of CYC induction followed by AZA maintenance was the most cost-effective strategy in China for short-term treatment, while the strategy of MMF in both induction and maintenance became cost-effective and yielded more desirable clinical outcomes for lifetime treatment. The uncertainty analysis supported the need for monitoring the progression to ESRD.

Emerging B-Cell Therapies in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic, multisystem, autoimmune disease of unknown etiology, whose hallmark is the production of autoantibodies. B cells are promising targets for novel SLE therapies. In 2011, belimumab (Benlysta®), a fully humanized monoclonal antibody inhibiting B-cell activation and proliferation, was the first medication in 50 years to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat adult SLE. This review discusses the current experience with B-cell-targeted therapies, including those targeting B-cell-surface antigens (rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, obinutuzumab, obexelimab, epratuzumab, daratumumab), B-cell survival factors (belimumab, tabalumab, atacicept, blisibimod), or B-cell intracellular functions (ibrutinib, fenebrutinib, proteasome inhibitors), for the management of SLE. It focuses on ongoing clinical trials and real-world post-marketing use, where available, including their safety profiles, and concludes with our recommendations for B-cell-centric approaches to the management of SLE.

Lupus nephritis: clinical presentations and outcomes in the 21st century

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a frequent and severe manifestation of SLE. Along the decades, the epidemiology of LN and its clinical presentation have been changing. However, even though retrospective cohort studies report a decreased mortality rate and an improvement in the disease prognosis, the percentage of patients progressing into end stage renal disease (ESRD) keeps steady despite the improvements in therapeutic strategies. Current in-use medications have been available for decades now, yet over the years, regimens for optimizing their efficacy and minimizing toxicity have been developed. Therapeutic research is now moving towards the direction of precision medicine and several new drugs, targeting selectively different pathogenetic pathways, are currently under evaluation with promising results. In this review, we address the main changes and persistent unmet needs in LN management throughout the past decades, with a focus on prognosis and upcoming treatments.

Renal disorders in rheumatologic diseases: the spectrum is changing (Part 1: connective tissue diseases)

The kidney is frequently involved by autoimmune rheumatic diseases. The renal manifestations may be variable, ranging from asymptomatic proteinuria and microscopic haematuria to nephrotic syndrome and rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis or vasculitis. In a number of cases the kidney involvement is related to the treatment of the original disease and may represent a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Thus, it is important for nephrologists and rheumatologists to remember that dysfunction of the kidney may be part of the primary systemic disorder or consequence of its pharmacotherapy. In the first part of this review we will analyse the kidney involvement in four autoimmune connective tissue diseases: systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögren syndrome, polymyositis/dermatomyositis, and systemic sclerosis. Renal disease is common in lupus and is a main cause of morbidity and mortality. About 10% of patients with Sjögren syndrome may present interstitial nephritis or, more rarely, glomerulonephritis. Myoglobinuria and acute kidney injury is a frequent complication of polymyositis. Renal disease is one of the most serious complications of systemic sclerosis and may present with a dramatic renal crisis, characterized by malignant hypertension, oligo-anuria, and microangiopathic thrombocytopenic anaemia.

Rituximab use as induction therapy for lupus nephritis: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Rituximab (RTX) has important usage in rheumatoid arthritis and vasculitis. There remains a need for more, better, and safer treatments for patients with lupus nephritis (LN). RTX has been trialed in such patients without definitive conclusions about its effectiveness. As a role for RTX has not been clearly established for LN, we carried out a systematic review and analysis.

METHODS

We identified 31 studies of RTX for class I-VI LN, and assessed complete renal response (CRR) and partial renal response (PRR) using criteria including serum creatinine, proteinuria, and urinary sediment. Due to differences in the pediatric presentation of the disease, studies focusing on pediatric patients were excluded.

RESULTS

One randomized controlled trial (RCT) showed superiority of RTX+cyclophosphamide (CYC) versus CYC alone (64% vs. 21% CRR and 19% vs. 36% PRR). Six prospective and retrospective studies utilizing RTX monotherapy found 66% CRR or PRR in all patients. Eleven studies that investigated RTX in combination with CYC or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) also found 66% CRR or PRR in all patients. In total, the CRR for Caucasian, East Asian, and Hispanic patients were 77%, 38%, and 28%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

RTX appeared to benefit certain LN patients, but most studies were not randomized or properly controlled, were heterogeneous in design, subjects, and LN types, and were not comparable, and must therefore be interpreted cautiously. RTX alone may not deplete B cells sufficiently for the perturbations of LN. In addition, RTX may induce responses differently among patients of different ethnic and racial backgrounds. Furthermore, there were wide variations in the baseline characteristics of the patients, namely LN class, time course of disease, age, and prior immunosuppressive use. We suggest a prospective RCT in patients aged 18-65 years with class IV LN. Ideally, the patients would not have received prior immunosuppression and would better represent different ethnicities. The treatment groups would be RTX, RTX+belimumab, CYC, and MMF groups, with pulse-dose steroids during induction followed by maintenance steroids and MMF. The CRR and PRR would be assessed at 12 and 24 months. This or a similar study might clarify RTX's role in the treatment of LN.

Autoimmune diseases and immune-checkpoint inhibitors for cancer therapy: review of the literature and personalized risk-based prevention strategy

Patients with cancer and with preexisting active autoimmune diseases (ADs) have been excluded from immunotherapy clinical trials because of concerns for high susceptibility to the development of severe adverse events resulting from exacerbation of their preexisting ADs. However, a growing body of evidence indicates that immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may be safe and effective in this patient population. However, baseline corticosteroids and other nonselective immunosuppressants appear to negatively impact drug efficacy, whereas retrospective and case report data suggest that use of specific immunosuppressants may not have the same consequences. Therefore, we propose here a two-step strategy. First, to lower the risk of compromising ICI efficacy before their initiation, nonselective immunosuppressants could be replaced by specific selective immunosuppressant drugs following a short rotation phase. Subsequently, combining ICI with the selective immunosuppressant could prevent exacerbation of the AD. For the most common active ADs encountered in the context of cancer, we propose specific algorithms to optimize ICI therapy. These preventive strategies go beyond current practices and recommendations, and should be practiced in ICI-specialized clinics, as these require multidisciplinary teams with extensive knowledge in the field of clinical immunology and oncology. In addition, we challenge the exclusion from ICI therapy for patients with cancer and active ADs and propose the implementation of an international registry to study such novel strategies in a prospective fashion.

Management and treatment of glomerular diseases (part 2): conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference

In November 2017, the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) initiative brought a diverse panel of experts in glomerular diseases together to discuss the 2012 KDIGO glomerulonephritis guideline in the context of new developments and insights that had occurred over the years since its publication. During this KDIGO Controversies Conference on Glomerular Diseases, the group examined data on disease pathogenesis, biomarkers, and treatments to identify areas of consensus and areas of controversy. This report summarizes the discussions on primary podocytopathies, lupus nephritis, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated nephritis, complement-mediated kidney diseases, and monoclonal gammopathies of renal significance.

[Lupus nephritis]

Systemic lupus erythematosus is the most characteristic of auto-immune disorders that can lead to tissue damage in many organs, including kidney. Lupus nephritis occurs in 10 to 40% of lupus patients. Its clinical hallmark is the appearance of a proteinuria as soon as a 0.5 g/g or 0.5 g/d threshold, which calls for a renal histological evaluation in order to determine the lupus nephritis severity and the need for specific therapy. More than half of renal biopsies lead to the diagnosis of active lupus nephritis-class III or class IV A according to the ISN/RPS classification-that are the most severe in regards to renal prognosis and mortality. Their treatment aims to their clinical remission and to the prevention of relapse with minimal adverse effects for eventually the preservation of renal function, the prevention of other irreversible damage, and the reduction of risk of death. The remission is obtained through induction therapies of which the association of high dose steroids and cyclophosphamide is the most experienced. When this association must be challenged by the prevention of side-effect, in particular infertility, mycophenolate can be given instead of cyclophosphamide. Maintenance therapy, for the prevention of relapse, consists in mycophenolate or in azathioprine, mycophenolate being the most efficient however associated with a high risk of teratogenicity. Withdrawal of maintenance therapy is possible after two to three years in absence of high risk factors of relapse of lupus nephritis, however a reliable assessment of the risk of relapse is still lacking. Only pure membranous lupus nephritis (pure class V) associated with high level proteinuria requires specific therapies that usually associates steroids and an immunosuppressive drug. However, their choice hierarchy and even the use of less immunosuppressive strategies remain to be determined in terms of benefice over risk ratios. In spite of its trigger effect on lupus activity, pregnancy can be safe and successful if scheduled in the lowest risk periods with close multidisciplinary monitoring before, during and after. When necessary, renal replacement therapy does not require specific adaptation, renal transplantation is the best option when possible, as early as possible.

Clinical efficacy and safety of rituximab in lupus nephritis

BACKGROUND

Long-term treatment programs with low toxicity represent a therapeutic challenge in lupus nephritis (LN). Although a therapeutic benefit of rituximab (RTX) has been reported in LN patients who have failed conventional treatment, the results are controversial. We aimed to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of RTX as a new immunosuppressive medicine in the treatment of LN with a meta-analysis.

METHODS

Based on predetermined criteria, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were used to identify the eligible studies. Cochrane Review Manager version 5.3 was applied to pool the data extracted from individual investigations and provide summary effect estimates.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies with 940 patients were analyzed. In case series trials with specific LN assessment, the complete remission (CR) rate at 12 months was 35.9% (95% CI: 24.2%-49.5%), and total remission (TR: CR plus partial remission) was 73.4% (95% CI: 66.0%-79.7%). In controlled trials, RTX was associated with a higher probability of TR (OR =2.02, 95% CI: 1.23-3.32, P<0.01). The CR in the RTX group was higher than that in the control group, although there was no significant difference between the two groups (OR =1.98, 95% CI: 0.90-4.39, P>0.05). Additionally, RTX treatment significantly decreased proteinuria (mean difference: -2.79, 95% CI: -3.95 to -1.62, P<0.01) as well as the renal activity index in patients with LN (mean difference: -3.46, 95% CI: -4.43 to -2.50, P<0.01). In controlled trials, the relative risks of the adverse events of infection and infusion reaction were not notably different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

RTX is a promising therapy for the treatment of LN due to significant clinical efficacy and a favorable safety profile. In future studies, larger study populations and longer-term time points may identify additional important patient-centered outcomes.

Outcomes of rituximab therapy in refractory lupus: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Conventional treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis (LN) is associated with damage accrual, hence increased morbidity rate. Off-label use of rituximab (RTX) has shown significant promise in this patient group; however, data are still controversial. We aimed to analyze the outcomes of RTX therapy in refractory lupus using a meta-analysis approach.

METHODS

Electronic search of the medical literature was conducted using a combination of relevant keywords to retrieve studies on the safety and efficacy of RTX in SLE and LN patients. Results were screened against our inclusion and exclusion criteria and two reviewers independently extracted the data for analysis. Comprehensive meta-analysis software was used to pool the data from individual studies and provide summary effect estimates.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies that enrolled 1112 patients were finally eligible for the meta-analysis. The overall global, complete, and partial response rates to RTX therapy were 72%, 46%, and 32%, respectively. RTX significantly decreased Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) and British Isles Lupus Activity Group (BILAG) scores (p<0.001). Prednisone dose was significantly reduced after RTX treatment in both SLE and LN groups (p<0.001), and proteinuria was lowered in SLE (p<0.001) than in LN patients (p=0.07). Infection and infusion-related reactions were the most common side effects.

CONCLUSION

RTX therapy in refractory SLE and LN patients proved clinical efficacy and favorable safety outcomes. Larger well-designed randomized clinical trials are warranted.

Overview of pathophysiology and treatment of human lupus nephritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite recent developments and treatment successes, the outcome, and prognosis of patients with lupus nephritis (LuN) have not greatly changed since the 1980s. This review covers the application of new concepts to the understanding of renal inflammation and the study of new pharmacologic agents to improve patient outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies have shown that the presence of anti-vimentin antibodies and T follicular helper cells in patient biopsies is associated with more severe interstitial inflammation, which has been tied to faster disease progression and onset of end-stage renal disease. Additionally, data regarding the role of serum IgE antidouble-stranded DNA antibodies in LuN by means of mediating IFN1 production by plasmacytoid dendritic cells are highlighted. Finally, a thorough review of completed and currently open clinical trials of therapeutic agents is provided.

SUMMARY

Current management of LuN is guided almost exclusively by glomerular involvement. Based on the data provided in this review, we argue that renal tubulointerstitial inflammation is no less important and represents an overlooked feature in the current clinical approach to patients. Tubulointerstitial inflammation is driven by both adaptive and innate immune mechanisms that are still poorly understood. Studying these pathogenic processes promises to reveal new therapeutic opportunities for those LuN patients with the worst prognosis.

VIDEO ABSTRACT

Alternate video abstract introduction (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, with introduction by two of the authors - VL and KT). Abstract Video: http://links.lww.com/COR/A35.

Research and therapeutics-traditional and emerging therapies in systemic lupus erythematosus

This review summarizes traditional and emerging therapies for SLE. Evidence suggests that the heterogeneity of SLE is a crucial aspect contributing to the failure of large clinical trials for new targeted therapies. A clearer understanding of the mechanisms driving disease pathogenesis combined with recent advances in medical science are predicted to enable accelerated progress towards improved SLE diagnosis and personalized approaches to treatment.

Broad Concepts in Management of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus is a multisystem autoimmune disease with protean manifestation. Although commonly seen in young women, it can affect men as well as elderly patients. Approach to treatment is multidisciplinary, involves defining the extent of organ involvement, and distinguishing between active manifestations and damage. The mainstay of therapy is judicious use of immunosuppressive medications. Long-term follow-up to address morbidity arising from treatment complications, disease damage, and increased cardiovascular risk is essential.

Lupus pathobiology based on genomics

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disorder with complex genetic underpinnings. This review attempts to assemble the myriad of genomic findings to build a clearer picture of the pathobiology of SLE to serve as a guide for therapeutics. Over 100 genes are now known for SLE, and several more penetrant ones have led to the emergence of more defined lupus phenotypes. Also discussed here are the targeted therapies that have come up on the horizon and the specific biologic mechanisms of more traditional therapies which have only recently been explored. The diagnostic toolbox has been enhanced by the addition of new antibodies, gene expression signatures, and mutation panels. This provides an opportunity to piece together the lupus puzzle and even revisit the clinical classification of SLE.

Improving B-cell depletion in systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Rituximab-based B-cell depletion (BCD) therapy is effective in refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and although used to treat patients with refractory systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in routine clinical practice, rituximab failed to meet the primary endpoints in two large randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of non-renal (EXPLORER) and renal (LUNAR) SLE. Areas covered: We review how BCD could be improved to achieve better clinical responses in RA and SLE. Insights into the variability in clinical response to BCD in RA and SLE may help develop new therapeutic strategies. To this end, a literature search was performed using the following terms: rheumatoid arthritis, systemic erythematosus lupus, rituximab and B-cell depletion. Expert commentary: Poor trial design may have, at least partly, contributed to the apparent lack of response to BCD in the two RCTs of patients with SLE. Enhanced B-cell depletion and/or sequential therapy with belimumab may improve clinical response at least in some patients with SLE.

Lupus nephritis: When and how often to biopsy and what does it mean?

Renal disease is a frequent complication of SLE which can lead to significant illness and even death. Today, a baseline renal biopsy is highly recommended for all subjects with evidence of lupus nephritis. Biopsy allows the clinician to recognize and classify different forms of autoimmune lupus glomerulonephritis, and to detect other glomerular diseases with variable pathogenesis which are not directly related to autoimmune reactivity, such as lupus podocytopathy. Moreover, not only glomerular diseases, but other severe forms of renal involvement, such as tubulo-interstitial nephritis or thrombotic microangiopathy may be detected by biopsy in lupus patients. Thus, an accurate definition of the nature and severity of renal involvement is mandatory to assess the possible risk of progression and to establish an appropriate treatment. The indications to repeat biopsy are more controversial. Some physicians recommend protocol biopsies to recognize the possible transformation from one class to another one, or to identify silent progression of renal disease, others feel that good clinical monitoring is sufficient to assess prognosis and to make therapeutic decisions. At any rate, although any decision should always be taken by considering the clinical conditions of the patient, there are no doubts that repeat renal biopsy may represent a useful tool in difficult cases to evaluate the response to therapy, to modulate the intensity of treatment, and to predict the long-term renal outcome both in quiescent lupus and in flares of activity.

Biologic agents in the treatment of glomerulonephritides

Current immunosuppression strategies in the treatment of glomerulonephritides remain unsatisfactory, especially in glomerular diseases that are frequently relapsing or are resistant to treatment. Toxicities associated with the use of drugs with non-specific targets for the immune response result in treatment non-compliance, and increase morbidity and mortality in these patients. Advances in our understanding of the immunopathogenesis of glomerulonephritis and the availability of biologics have led to their successful use in the treatment of immune-mediated glomerular diseases. Biologics are usually very large complex molecules, often produced using recombinant DNA technology and manufactured in a living system such as a microorganism, or plant or animal cells. They are novel agents that can target specific immune cell types, cytokines or immune pathways involved in the pathogenesis of these disorders. It is attractive to consider that, given their specific mode of action, these agents can potentially offer a more directed and effective immunosuppression, with side-effect profiles that are much more desirable. However, there have been few randomized controlled trials comparing biologic agents to conventional immunosuppression, and in many of these studies the side-effect profiles have been disappointingly similar. In this review, we will examine the rationale, efficacy and safety of some commonly used biologics in the treatment of primary and secondary glomerulonephritides. We will also discuss some of the key challenges that may be encountered with the use of biologics in treating glomerulonephritis in the future.

Standard of treatment and outcomes of adults with lupus nephritis in Africa: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a significant cause of mortality and morbidity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and the severity of disease has been described to be increased in Africans. Observational studies have been conducted; however, the treatment and outcome of African patients with LN has not been rigorously assessed.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of studies selected from a PubMed search of outcome in Africans with biopsy-proven LN from 1 January 1990 to 30 June 2015. Studies that gave information on histology, treatment and outcome of patients were included.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were selected from a search that yielded 302 papers; half were from North Africa, 2/16 (12.5%) were prospective studies and 2/16 (12.5%) were multi-centre studies. The sample size of reported biopsies in the studies ranged from 22 to 246 patients. Only 3/16 (18.8%) studies used more recent criteria for the classification and reporting of renal histology, and proliferative LN (class III and IV) were reported with increased frequency from the studies. For induction therapy, all the studies reported use of corticosteroids while 15/16 (93.8%) of the studies also used cyclophosphamide (CYC) as an induction agent. Overall mortality rates ranged from 7.9% to 34.9% with increased disease activity, kidney failure and infections cited as common causes of mortality. Five-year renal survival was 48-84% while five-year patient survival was 54%-94%. Survival rates were higher for studies reported from North Africa.

CONCLUSION

This analysis highlights diagnostic challenges in LN in Africa and shows that a CYC/glucocorticoid-based regimen remains the standard of treatment for adult patients. The contributions of this therapy to reported outcomes of LN in Africa require further exploration.

Rituximab in lupus nephritis: A non-systematic review

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a common and severe complication in patients with lupus. Current therapy is based on immunosuppressive drugs and glucocorticoids. Recently, rituximab has been proposed as an alternative treatment for LN. Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody directed against the CD20 antigen receptor on B cells. The aim of this review is to summarize all the available information about rituximab in LN. Eleven studies were found; three of them were observational studies (2 prospective and 1 retrospective) and eight were clinical trials (7 open-label studies and only 1 randomized controlled trial [RCT]). The evidence is insufficient to establish the role of rituximab in the treatment of LN. Results from the only RCT, which were negative, suggest a clinical benefit in black people. Further studies must confirm this hypothesis. Controlled clinical trials involving adaptive randomization are required to establish the real benefit of rituximab in LN.

A 4-year observation in lupus nephritis patients treated with an intensified B-lymphocyte depletion without immunosuppressive maintenance treatment-Clinical response compared to literature and immunological re-assessment

BACKGROUND

B cells (BC) play a critical role in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). BC depletion therapy still remains an attractive option, despite the disappointing results of randomized controlled trials (RTCs).

METHODS

Twelve patients with SLE [3 males, mean age 43.8 yrs (25-55)] with severe multiorgan involvement all including kidney (3 patients with Class IV, 4 with Class III/V and 5 with Class V, according to the International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society glomerulonephritis classification), skin lesions [10], severe polyarthralgias with arthritis [10], polyserositis [2], and lymphadenopathy [5] have been prospectively treated with an intensified B cell depletion therapy (IBCDT) protocol due to their resistance or intolerance to previous therapy (six cases) or as a front line immunosuppressive treatment in 6 women with unsatisfactory therapeutic compliance or as a specific request of a short-time immunosuppression for gestational perspectives.

PROTOCOL

Rituximab (RTX) 375 mg/sm on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 2 more doses after 1 and 2 months, associated with 2 IV administrations of 10mg/kg of cyclophosphamide and 3 methylprednisolone pulses (15mg/kg) followed by oral prednisone (0.8 mg/kg/day, rapidly tapered to 5mg/day by the end of the 3rd month after RTX). No further immunosuppressive maintenance therapy has been given.

RESULTS

Patients had been followed-up for a mean of 44.5 (24-93)months. Significant decreases (p<0.05) were found in the levels of ESR (baseline mean value: 55.0mm; 3 months: 36; end of follow-up: 13), anti-dsDNA antibodies (baseline: 185 U; 3 months: 107; end of follow-up: 15), and proteinuria (baseline: 4.9 g/24h; 3 months: 0.97; end of follow-up: 0.22). C4 values (baseline 11 mg/dl) significantly increased (p<0.05) after 3 months (22 mg/dl) and at the end of the follow-up (20mg/dl). Of the 12 patients, 9 (75%) have remained well after one cycle of IBCDT, with no flare (mean 51.6 months [25-93]). Three patients relapsed after 36, 41, and 72 months, respectively. Following re-treatment, they again showed complete remission over 18-48 months of observation.

CONCLUSIONS

A promising role of RTX in an intensified protocol of induction therapy can be envisaged in patients for whom avoiding immunosuppressive maintenance therapy and sparing steroids are particularly appealing. Moreover, our data confirm in one of the longest follow-up available, the opportunity to reconsider the regimens of BL depletion in the treatment of the most severe or refractory forms of SLE despite the disappointing results of RCTs.

Influence of renal complications on the efficacy and adverse events of tacrolimus combination therapy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) during a maintenance phase: a single-centre, prospective study

OBJECTIVES

The study investigated whether renal complications affected the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus combination therapy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) during a maintenance phase.

METHODS

Fifty-seven patients with SLE (A: 30 cases with renal complication, B: 27 cases without renal complications) were included. The presence of renal complications was defined as proteinuria ≥0.5 g/day and lupus nephritis on renal biopsy. Major outcome measures included SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI), steroid dose, serum anti-dsDNA Ab, C3 and creatinine (Cr) levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The patient's background factors included age, gender, disease duration and ACE-I/angiotensin II receptor blocker and statin therapies. We compared these outcome measures pre treatment and after 1 year of treatment.

RESULTS

The SLEDAI and serum C3 levels improved in both groups from pretreatment period to post-treatment period: from 7.2±5.0 to 2.8±2.3 in A and 6.4±3.8 to 2.4±2.2 in B, p<0.001, and from 65.9±24.6 to 77.7±18.2 mg/dL in A and 81.8±23.0 to 90.6±19.4 mg/dL in B, p=0.002, respectively. The anti-dsDNA antibody level was reduced, and the serum Cr and eGFR levels were slightly elevated. No patients developed end-stage renal failure that required artificial dialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus combination therapy had additive beneficial effects on reduced proteinuria and increased serum C3 levels in patients with SLE with renal complications during a maintenance phase.

Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, associated with antibodies to signal recognition particle, together with lupus nephritis: case presentation and management

A male patient with limb weakness, myalgia and edema was subsequently found to have an immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) on biopsy. Targeted myopathic antibody analysis revealed antibodies to signal recognition particle (SRP). Anti-SRP-associated necrotizing myopathy was diagnosed. This case was complicated by the concurrent development of class III lupus nephritis. We discuss an interesting case progression and development as well as the management of these difficult to treat conditions.

Rituximab and lupus--a promising pair?

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a clinically diverse and potentially life-threatening auto-immune disease that can affect almost any organ system. Although much is still unknown regarding its pathogenesis, B cell abnormalities are thought to be central. A high relapse rate along with the toxicity associated with conventional treatments signify the need for more tailored approaches in this very heterogeneous disease. Both its mechanism targeting B cells and a relatively large number of case series and observational studies have suggested that the B cell-depleting agent rituximab could be a potent SLE drug. However, two randomized controlled trials failed to meet efficacy endpoints. Nevertheless, rituximab has continued to be used as an off-label alternative mainly in patients refractory to conventional immunosuppressive treatment. This article will review the current role of rituximab in SLE.

Safety and efficacy of rituximab in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus and other rheumatic diseases

OBJECTIVE

Rituximab (RTX) has been used to treat many pediatric autoimmune conditions. We investigated the safety and efficacy of RTX in a variety of pediatric autoimmune diseases, especially systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

Retrospective study of children treated with RTX. Effectiveness data was recorded for patients with at least 12 months of followup; safety data was recorded for all subjects.

RESULTS

The study included 104 children; 50 had SLE. Improvements in corticosteroid dosage, physician's global assessment of disease activity, and SLE-associated markers of disease activity were seen. The incidence of hospitalized infections was similar to previous studies of patients with childhood-onset SLE.

CONCLUSION

RTX can be safely administered to children and appears to contribute to decreased disease activity and steroid burden.