Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) associated B-cell lymphoproliferative disease following HLA identical sibling marrow transplantation for aplastic anaemia in a patient with an EBV seronegative donor

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and the noncytomegalovirus herpesviruses

Although hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and other cellular therapies have significantly improved outcomes in the management of multiple hematological and nonhematological malignancies, the resulting impairment in humoral and cellular response increases the risk for opportunistic infection as an undesirable side effect. With their ability to establish latent infection and reactivate when the host immune system is at its weakest point, the Herpesviridae family constitutes a significant proportion of these opportunistic pathogens. Despite recent advancements in preventing and managing herpesvirus infections, they continue to be a common cause of significant morbidity and mortality in transplanted patients. Herein, we aim to provide and update on herpesvirus other than cytomegalovirus (CMV) affecting recipients of HSCT and other cellular therapies.

Post-transplant primary cutaneous peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified in a pediatric patient

Solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation may be complicated by the development of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs). The World Health Organization categorizes PTLDs into four entities including non-destructive, monomorphic, polymorphic, and classical Hodgkin lymphoma types. The most common PTLDs are B-cell lymphomas, with T-cell lymphomas accounting for only a few cases. Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas are rarer still in post-transplant patients with primary cutaneous peripheral T-cell lymphoma being an extraordinarily rare subtype in this population. PTLDs may be aggressive and are often associated with high morbidity and mortality. Advances in medicine have led to increased awareness of PTLDs and improved diagnostic tools which assist in the diagnosis of these conditions. However, the clinical and histopathologic heterogeneity of PTLDs may make diagnosis a challenge. In the transplant patient population, the cutaneous manifestations of the lymphoproliferative disease may mimic other conditions, such as eczematous dermatitis and graft-vs-host disease. Herein, we report a case of post-transplant primary cutaneous peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) in a pediatric heart transplant patient and describe the clinical presentation and diagnostic histopathologic features.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is an increasingly recognized complication of solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. PTLD represents a spectrum of polyclonal and monoclonal lymphoproliferation, generally of B cells. Prompt diagnosis is key and requires a high index of suspicion. An increasing variety of highly effective therapies, including immune modulation via reduction in immunosuppression, monoclonal antibodies, and cellular therapy, have dramatically improved the cure rates of this once devastating disease.

Favorable effect on acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease with cyclophosphamide and in vivo anti-CD52 monoclonal antibodies for marrow transplantation from HLA-identical sibling donors for acquired aplastic anemia

Between August 1989 and November 2003, 33 patients at our center with acquired aplastic anemia underwent bone marrow transplantation (BMT) from HLA-identical sibling donors with cyclophosphamide and in vivo anti-CD52 monoclonal antibodies (MoAb) for conditioning. The median age at BMT was 17 years (range, 4-46 years). Before BMT, 58% were heavily transfused (>50 transfusions), and 42% had previously experienced treatment failure with antithymocyte globulin-based immunosuppressive therapy. Unmanipulated bone marrow was used as the source of stem cells in all patients except 1. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was with cyclosporine alone in 19 (58%) patients; 14 received anti-CD52 MoAb in addition to cyclosporine. The conditioning regimen was well tolerated without significant acute toxicity. Graft failure was seen in 8 patients (primary, n = 4; secondary, n = 4). Of those whose grafts failed, 4 survived long-term (complete autologous recovery, n = 2; rescue with previously stored marrow, n = 1; second allograft, n = 1). The cumulative incidence of graft failure and grade II to IV acute and chronic GVHD was 24%, 14%, and 4%, respectively. None developed extensive chronic GVHD. With a median follow-up of 59 months, the 5-year survival was 81% (95% confidence interval, 68%-96%). No unexpected early or late infectious or noninfectious complications were observed. We conclude that the conditioning regimen containing cyclophosphamide and anti-CD52 MoAb is well tolerated and effective for acquired aplastic anemia with HLA-matched sibling donors. The favorable effect on the incidence and severity of GVHD is noteworthy in this study and warrants further investigation.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder: a review

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) represents a spectrum of Epstein-Barr virus-related (EBV) clinical diseases, from a benign mononucleosis-like illness to a fulminant non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. In the setting of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, PTLD is an often-fatal complication occurring relatively early after transplant. Risk factors for the development of PTLD are well established, and include HLA-mismatching, T-cell depletion, and the use of antilymphocyte antibodies as conditioning or treatment of graft-versus-host disease. Early recognition of PTLD is particularly important in the SCT setting, because PTLD in these patients tends to be rapidly progressive. Familiarity with the clinical features of PTLD and a heightened level of suspicion are critical for making the diagnosis. Surveillance techniques with EBV antibody titers and/or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) may have a role in some high-risk settings. Immune-based therapies such as monoclonal anti-B-cell antibodies, interferon-alpha, and EBV-specific donor T cells, either as treatment for PTLD or as prophylaxis in high-risk patients, represent promising new directions in the treatment of this disease.

Ex vivo evaluation of PBMNCs collected with a new cell separator

BACKGROUND

This study reports on an evaluation of the ability of a cell separator (Amicus, Baxter Healthcare) and the integral MNC computer software program to collect a variety of MNC subsets. The collection efficiency (CE) of the Amicus for these MNC subsets was compared to that of another cell separator (CS-3000 Plus, Baxter). The collected MNCs were also assayed ex vivo to determine if these cells remained functional.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Healthy volunteer blood donors were recruited to provide PBMNCs for the isolation of CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD19+, NK, and gammadelta+ cells and monocytes. Cells were collected with an Amicus (test arm; n = 16) or a CS-3000 Plus (control arm; n = 11) cell separator. Cells were counted on a flow cytometer and CEs were calculated. For functional studies, the Amicus-collected MNC data were compared to CS-3000 Plus historical data. Functional studies performed included surface antigen expression assays (CD8+), proliferation assays (CD4+ and CD8+ cells), NK cytotoxicity assays for K562 and HUVE cells, and E-selectin induction on endothelial cells through NK+ contact dependency. Dendritic cells (DCs) were generated from CD34+ cells collected on the Amicus, positively selected by the use of antibody-bound, magnetic bead technology, and then cultured ex vivo with a combination of growth factors to generate the DCs.

RESULTS

CEs were higher on the Amicus than on the CS-3000 Plus for CD3+ (68 vs. 54%), CD4+ (70 vs. 56%), CD8+ (68 vs. 52%), and CD19+ (60 vs. 48%) cells (p<0.05). For the two separators, CEs were equivalent for monocytes, NK+, and gammadelta+ cells. The Amicus separator collected significantly fewer platelets than did the CS-3000 Plus (p<0.00001). CD4+, CD8+, and NK cells proliferated normally. NK cells appropriately stimulated E-selectin expression on endothelial cells. Culture-generated DCs obtained by using Amicus-collected CD34+ cells expressed appropriate cell surface markers.

CONCLUSION

The Amicus separator is acceptable for the collection of PBMNC subsets. The device collects CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, and CD19+ T- and B-cell subsets with greater efficiency and collects MNCs with significantly fewer contaminating platelets than does the CS-3000 Plus. Cells collected on the Amicus are suitable for use in a variety of research and clinical immunobiologic studies.