Not only for melanoma. Subcutaneous pseudoprogression in lung squamous-cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab: A case report

Pseudoprogression of thoracic tumor after radiotherapy in the era of immunotherapy: a case series

Pseudoprogression is rarely mentioned after radiotherapy except for central nervous system tumors. With the widespread of immunotherapy, the incidence of pseudoprogression of thoracic tumor after radiotherapy is increasing. This study summarized the clinical features of pseudoprogression in 4 patients who had underwent thoracic radiotherapy after and/or followed by immunotherapy. All of them had received chemotherapy and immunotherapy before thoracic radiotherapy. After radiotherapy, pseudoprogression occurred within 3 months after initiation of immune consolidation/rechallenge therapy. At least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions were measured on their chest image. During this period, patients' ECOG PS scores remained stable, specific serum tumor markers did not increase significantly. Treatment strategies did not change after pseudoprogression. The causes of radiographic pseudoprogression in this case series may be attributed to disturbances such as pneumonitis, atelectasis, mucus blockages and infection. In the era of immunotherapy, pseudoprogression of thoracic tumors after chest radiotherapy might become a common phenomenon. It is important for us to identify pseudoprogression based on patient's general status, radiological changes, and laboratory tests.

Rapid subcutaneous progression after immunotherapy in pretreated patients with metastatic carcinoma: two case reports

There is heterogeneity in cancer patients' responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including hyperprogression, which is very rapid tumor progression following immunotherapy, and pseudoprogression, which is an initial increase followed by a decrease in tumor burden or in the number of tumor lesions. This heterogeneity complicates clinical decisions because either premature withdrawal of the treatment or prolonged ineffective treatment harms patients. We presented two patients treated with ICIs with heterogeneous responses. One patient had Merkel cell carcinoma in the right thigh, and the other had nasopharyngeal squamous carcinoma. The first patient was treated with sintilimab and the second with sintilimab combined with abraxane. In the first patient, subcutaneous lesions grew substantially after the first cycle of treatment with sintilimab. In the second patient, subcutaneous lesions grew gradually after the second cycle of treatment with sintilimab combined with abraxane. In both cases, biopsy examination confirmed that newly emerged lesions were metastases of the primary tumor. These two cases remind clinicians that when subcutaneous nodules appear after treatment with ICIs, pathological biopsy is needed to determine the nature-pseudoprogression or rapid progression-of the disease course.

Pseudoprogression in lung cancer patients treated with immunotherapy

Lung cancer has attracted much attention because of its high morbidity and mortality worldwide. The advent of immunotherapy approaches, especially the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has dramatically changed the treatment of lung cancer, but a novel and unexpected pattern of treatment response-- pseudoprogression, has been observed simultaneously which complicates the routine clinical evaluation and management. However, manifestations of pseudoprogression vary and there are many disputes on immune-related response assessment and corresponding treatments for lung cancer. Therefore, we summarized the possible mechanisms, clinical manifestations and corresponding treatment measures of pseudoprogression in lung cancer, as well as potential methods to differentiate pseudoprogression from true tumor progression.

Immune PET Imaging

Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT is sensitive to metabolic, immune-related, and structural changes that can occur in tumors in cancer immunotherapy. Unique mechanisms of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) occasionally make response evaluation challenging, because tumors and inflammatory changes are both FDG avid. These response patterns and sequelae of ICI immunotherapy, such as immune-related adverse events, are discussed. Immune-specific PET imaging probes at preclinical stage or in early clinical trials, which may help guide clinical management of cancer patients treated with immunotherapy and likely have applications outside of oncology for other diseases in which the immune system plays a role, are reviewed.

Pseudoprogression and hyperprogression in lung cancer: a comprehensive review of literature

PURPOSE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are associated with clinical benefit in lung cancer. However, response patterns to immunotherapy, including pseudoprogression and hyperprogression, are difficult to diagnose, and their mechanisms remain unclear. This review aimed to describe two response patterns observed in lung cancer, namely pseudoprogression and hyperprogression, including their epidemiology, diagnostic characteristics, and plausible mechanisms.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive literature search in the PubMed database, using keywords "pseudoprogression", "hyperprogression", and "lung cancer", among others. The literature was examined for pseudoprogression and hyperprogression characteristics and plausible mechanisms.

RESULTS

Pseudoprogression manifests in multiple forms; however, the immune system-related response criteria and biopsy data are helpful to make accurate diagnosis. Serological biomarkers, such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), might help distinguish pseudoprogression from true progression. The incidence of hyperprogression ranges within 5-19.2%, depending on definition. The unique response pattern of rapid progression is observed not only with immunotherapy, but also with other treatment regimens. Molecular mutations and amplifications may result in hyperprogression; however, the exact mechanism remains unclear.

CONCLUSION

Atypical response patterns, such as pseudoprogression and hyperprogression, are increasingly common in clinical practice. Immune-related response criteria can help diagnose pseudoprogression. Molecular mechanisms of hyperprogression remain unclear. Biomarkers for pseudoprogression and hyperprogression are required.

Atypical response with bone pseudoprogression in a patient receiving nivolumab for advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma

Currently, there is no established standard of care for patients with metastatic CSCC. Based on the mechanisms of CSCC carcinogenesis has been postulated that these tumors may be amenable to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade.This case illustrates a patient with CSCC with nodal involvement and pulmonary metastases, refractory to two lines of platinum-based regimens and salvage surgery, for whom treatment with nivolumab was recommended. His clinical course was marked by an atypical pattern of response, with initial reduction of soft tissue/visceral lesions, yet development of new bone findings, followed by overall improvement in subsequent scans and sustained disease control upon treatment continuation.The case of patient with metastatic CSCC, refractory, received immunotherapy and evolved with atypical pattern of response.

Immune RECIST criteria and symptomatic pseudoprogression in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immunotherapy

Background

Uncommon response during immunotherapy is a new challenging issue in oncology practice. Recently, new criteria for evaluation of response to immunotherapy immune response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (iRECIST) were accepted. According to iRECIST, worsening of performance status (PS) accompanied to pseudoprogression reflects most probably the true progression of the malignant disease.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature was made by using several electronic database with the following search criteria: symptomatic pseudoprogression, atypical response, immunotherapy and lung cancer.

Results

In the literature, we identified five reports of seven patients treated with immunotherapy that met the inclusion criteria. We also report our experience of patient with pseudoprogression and almost complete response after one dose of immunotherapy.

Conclusions

As seen from our review, iRECIST criteria might be insufficient in distinguishing true progression from pseudoprogression in some patients with advanced NSCLC treated with immunotherapy. More precise assessment methods are urgently needed.

Well-controlled pleural effusion indicated pseudoprogression after immunotherapy in lung cancer: A case report

Squamous cancer (SqCC) of the lung has a poor prognosis. With the advent of immunotherapy, prognosis has tended to improve; however, pseudoprogression poses a challenge to the management of immunotherapy. Herein, we discuss the case of a 47‐year‐old heavy smoker with advanced SqCC. The patient had recurrent disease after initial successful control of the tumor by concurrent radiochemotherapy, together with ample pleural effusion. Pleural effusion was well controlled with systematic nivolumab and intra‐thoracic recombinant endostatin; however with simultaneous deterioration of performance and tumor progression. Nivolumab was maintained with the addition of nab‐paclitaxel. The combination soon led to a partial response and rapid improvement of the patient's performance. During treatment of this case, we advocated the early control of pleural effusion as an indicator for pseudoprogression. Our experience might be helpful to identify pseudoprogression for the clinical management of immunotherapy.

Pseudoprogression of CNS metastatic disease of alveolar soft part sarcoma during anti-PDL1 treatment

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are increasingly used in treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma, melanoma, and nonsmall cell lung cancer, as well as in clinical trials for novel targets. We present a pediatric patient with metastatic alveolar soft part sarcoma who was treated with MPDL3280 (Atezolizumab), a monoclonal anti-programmed death ligand-1 antibody. Imaging results for the patient suggested disease progression of multiple brain metastases with stable systemic disease. The patient met response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) criteria of progression of disease and was removed from treatment with MPDL3280. Subsequent surgical resection of the brain lesions revealed nonviable tumor with extensive lymphocytic infiltrates consistent with pseudoprogression. This case report adds to a growing number of reports that question reliance on RECIST criteria and suggest need for further refinement of RECIST or irRECIST during immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment for central nervous system metastatic lesions.

Dynamic Adaptation of Tumor Immune Response With Nivolumab Demonstrated by 18F-FDG PET/CT

A 61-year-old woman with lung adenocarcinoma failed first-line treatment and was placed on immunotherapy with nivolumab. FDG-PET/CT before immunotherapy showed metastases to thoracic nodes, liver, adrenal gland, and skeleton. Seven weeks after starting nivolumab, FDG-PET/CT showed mild residual activity in thoracic nodes and otherwise complete response. After 15 weeks, enlarged and FDG-avid axillary lymphadenopathy and worsening supraclavicular lymphadenopathy developed. After 20 weeks, FDG-PET/CT demonstrated marked improvement of axillary and supraclavicular lymphadenopathy. This case demonstrates that later progression of disease can still respond to continuing immunotherapy, hypothetically because of dynamic adaptations in the tug-of-war between the immunotherapy-augmented immune system and tumor.

Rapid Progressive Disease After Nivolumab Therapy in Three Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIM

Rapid progressive disease (RPD), accelerated tumour growth immediate after the initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, has been reported in melanoma and lung cancer. Herein, we describe 3 cases of RPD during the initial phase of nivolumab treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The first and second patients received nivolumab in the fourth-line setting. The third patient received nivolumab therapy as third-line treatment.

RESULTS

The first patient developed severe respiratory failure due to carcinomatous lymphangiosis 14 days after initiation of nivolumab therapy. The second patient developed leg paraplegia due to rapid growth of the metastatic tumour at the sixth thoracic vertebrae 5 days later. The third patient developed grade 4 hypercalcemia due to RPD on day 3.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians should be aware of RPD during the initial phase of nivolumab therapy, especially in patients with critical lesions in the late-line setting.