Higher Waitlist Mortality in Pediatric Acute-on-chronic Liver Failure in the UNOS Database

Postoperative outcomes of acute-on-chronic liver failure in infants and children with biliary atresia

INTRODUCTION

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is associated with increased mortality and morbidity in patients with biliary atresia (BA). Data on impact of ACLF on postoperative outcomes, however, are sparse.

METHOD

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with BA aged <18 years who underwent LT between 2011 and 2021 at our institution. ACLF was defined using the pediatric ACLF criteria: ≥1 extra-hepatic organ failure in children with decompensated cirrhosis.

RESULTS

Of 107 patients (65% female; median age 14 [9-31] months) who received a LT, 13 (12%) had ACLF during the index admission prior to LT. Two (15%) had Grade 1; 4 (30%) had Grade 2; and 7 (55%) had Grade ≥3 ACLF. ACLF cohort was younger at time of listing (5 [4-8] vs. 9 [6-24] months; p < .001) and at LT (8 [8-11] vs. 16 [10-40] months, p < .001) compared to no-ACLF group. Intraoperatively, ACLF patients had higher blood loss (40 [20-53] vs. 10 [6-19] mL/kg; p < .001) and blood transfusion requirements (33 [21-69] vs. 18 [7-25] mL/kg; p = .004). Postoperatively, they needed higher vasopressor support (31% vs. 10.6%; p = .04) and had higher total hospital length of stay (106 [45-151] vs. 13 [7-30] days; p = .023). Rate of return to the operating room, hospital readmission rates, and 1-year post-LT survival rates were comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Despite higher perioperative complications, survival outcomes for ACLF in BA after LT are favorable and comparable to those without ACLF. These encouraging data reiterate prioritization during organ allocation of these critically ill children for LT.

Pediatric Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is characterized by an acute hepatic insult happening in a patient with underlying cirrhosis with compromised hepatic reserve leading to development of systemic inflammation, sepsis, and organ failure resulting in poor outcome in majority. While Asia Pacific Association for Study of Liver Diseases (APASL) emphasizes on early diagnosis before development of organ failure, European Association for Study of Liver Diseases (EASL) mandates the presence of organ failures to define ACLF. There is a lack of consensus definition of pediatric ACLF although recent APASL guidelines have tried to address the issue. While Wilson disease (WD) and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) are the most common cause of underlying cirrhosis in children, acute viral hepatitis and flares of WD and AIH are the commonest acute precipitating events. Poor outcomes [death and liver transplantation (LT)] ranging from 19 to 59% have been reported. Prognosis in pediatric ACLF is usually better than that in adults due to greater proportion of treatable etiologies, lesser organ failures, comorbidities and better hepatic reserves. APASL ACLF Research Consortium (AARC) score more than or equal to 11 is predictive of poor 28-90 d mortality. Treatment of pediatric ACLF relies mainly on prompt diagnosis and medical management of a potentially treatable etiology of underlying cirrhosis. Bridging therapies, especially high volume plasma exchange can be initiated early as a bridge to LT or native liver recovery. Those with no improvement in 4-7 d should undergo LT before development of sepsis or multi-organ failure.

Tailoring allocation policies and improving access to paediatric liver transplantation over a 16-year period

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Mortality on the paediatric liver transplantation (pLT) waiting list (WL) is still an issue. We analysed the Italian pLT WL to evaluate the intention-to-treat (ITT) success rate and to identify factors influencing success.

METHODS

All children (<18 years) listed for pLT in Italy between 2002-2018 were included (Era 1 [2002-2007]: centre-based allocation; Era 2 [2008-2014]: national allocation; Era 3 [2015-2018]: national allocation+mandatory-split policy).

RESULTS

A total of 1,424 patients (median age: 2.0 [IQR 1.0-9.0] years; median weight: 12.0 kg [IQR 7-27]) were listed for pLT. Median WL time was 2 days (IQR 1-5) for Status 1 and 44 days (IQR 15-120) for non-Status 1 patients; 1,302 children (91.4%) were transplanted (67.3% with split grafts), while 50 children (3.5%) dropped off the WL (2.5% death, 1.0% clinical deterioration). Predictive factors for receiving LT included Status 1 (hazard ratio [HR] 1.66, p = 0.001), Status 1B (HR 1.96, p = 0.016), Status 2A (HR 2.15, p = 0.024) and each 1-point increase in PELD/MELD score. Children with recipient's weight >25 kg, blood group O or awaiting pLT combined with other organs had less chance of being transplanted. ITT patient survival rates were 90.5% at 1 year and 87.5% at 5 years, remaining stable across eras. Risk factors for ITT survival were re-transplantation (HR 5.83, p <0.001), Status 1 (HR 2.28, p = 0.006), Status 1B (HR 2.90, p = 0.014), Status 2A (HR 9.12, p <0.001), recipient weight <6 kg (HR 4.53, p <0.001) and low-volume activity (HR 4.38, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In Italy, continuous adaption of paediatric organ allocation policies via the introduction of national allocation, paediatric prioritisation rules and a mandatory-split policy have helped maximise the use of donors for paediatric candidates and to minimise WL mortality without compromising outcomes.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

Globally, paediatric liver transplant candidates still suffer from high mortality. Over recent decades, the continuous adaption of organ allocation policies in Italy has led to excellent outcomes for children awaiting liver transplantation. The mortality rate of paediatric liver transplant candidates has been minimised to almost zero, mainly using grafts from deceased donors. Paediatric prioritisation rules, national organ exchange organisation and a mandatory-split liver policy have resulted in a unique allocation model for paediatric liver transplant candidates and represent a landmark for the paediatric transplant community.

Consensus document on acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) established by the Mexican Association of Hepatology

Acute-on chronic liver failure (ACLF) has been an intensively debated topic mainly due to the lack of a unified definition and diagnostic criteria. The growing number of publications describing the mechanisms of ACLF development, the progression of the disease, outcomes and treatment has contributed to a better understanding of the disease, however, it has also sparked the debate about this condition. As an attempt to provide medical professionals with a more uniform definition that could be applied to our population, the first Mexican consensus was performed by a panel of experts in the area of hepatology in Mexico. We used the most relevant and impactful publications along with the clinical and research experience of the consensus participants. The consensus was led by 4 coordinators who provided the most relevant bibliography by doing an exhaustive search on the topic. The entire bibliography was made available to the members of the consensus for consultation at any time during the process and six working groups were formed to develop the following sections: 1.- Generalities, definitions, and criteria, 2.- Pathophysiology of cirrhosis, 3.- Genetics in ACLF, 4.- Clinical manifestations, 5.- Liver transplantation in ACLF, 6.- Other treatments.

Acute-on-chronic liver failure before liver transplantation does not impact post-transplant survival in children with biliary atresia

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) occurs in children with biliary atresia (BA) awaiting liver transplantation (LT). However, data on transplant outcomes in ACLF are limited. Our aim was to characterize ACLF and determine its effect on transplant outcome and resource utilization. Using a linkage of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and Pediatric Health Information System, we identified children with BA between 3 months and 18 years at the time of listing who received a transplant from 2003 to 2018 and were hospitalized while waiting. ACLF was defined by the presence of at least 1 extra-hepatic organ failure during a pre-LT hospitalization. In all, 1044 patients (58% female, median age at listing 7.0 months IQR 5.0-14.0) were included. Thirty-four percent (351/1044) of the patients had at least 1 ACLF hospitalization. Patients with ACLF had longer waitlist times (114 [54-231] vs. 81 [35-181] days, p < 0.001), and were more likely to be listed as Status 1 (8% vs. 4%, p = 0.02). Pre-LT resource utilization was significantly higher in ACLF patients. There were no differences in mortality at 30 days (ACLF 3% vs. No ACLF 2%, p = 0.17), 90 days (ACLF 3% vs. No ACLF 2%, p = 0.24), 1 year (ACLF 3% vs. No ACLF 2%, p =0.23), 3 years (ACLF 4% vs. No ACLF 3%, p = 0.58), or 5 years (ACLF 5% vs. No ACLF 4%, p = 0.38) after LT. ACLF status was not associated with increased post-transplant mortality (adjusted HR 1.51, 95% CI 0.76-3.0, p =0.25). ACLF is an important morbidity in children with BA awaiting LT as it is associated with higher resource utilization and longer waitlist times. Further studies are needed to help understand the spectrum of ACLF and better prioritize critically ill children awaiting LT, as our study shows successful post-LT outcomes in children with BA and ACLF.

Status 1B designation does not adequately prioritize children with acute-on-chronic liver failure for liver transplantation

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is an acute decompensation of chronic liver disease leading to multiorgan failure and mortality. The objective of this study was to evaluate characteristics and outcomes of children with ACLF who are at the highest priority for liver transplantation (LT) on the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database-listed as status 1B. The characteristics and outcomes of 478 children with ACLF listed as status 1B on the UNOS LT waiting list from 2007-2019 were compared with children with similar or higher priority listing for transplant: 929 with acute liver failure (ALF) listed as status 1A and 808 with metabolic diseases and malignancies listed as status 1B (termed "non-ACLF"). Children with ACLF had comparable rates of cumulative organ failures compared with ALF (45% vs. 44%; p > 0.99) listings, but higher than non-ACLF (45% vs. 1%; p < 0.001). ACLF had the lowest LT rate (79%, 84%, 95%; p < 0.001), highest pre-LT mortality (20%, 11%, 1%; p < 0.001), and longest waitlist time (57, 3, 56 days; p < 0.001), and none recovered without LT (0%, 4%, 1%; p < 0.001). In survival analyses, ACLF was associated with an increased adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for post-LT mortality (HR, 1.50 vs. ALF [95% confidence interval, CI, 1.02-2.19; p = 0.04] and HR, 1.64 vs. non-ACLF [95% CI, 1.15-2.34; p = 0.01]). ACLF has the least favorable waitlist and post-LT outcomes of all patients who are status 1A/1B. Increased prioritization on the LT waiting list may offer children with ACLF an opportunity for enhanced outcomes.

Acute-on-chronic liver failure: A 20-year retrospective review of a tertiary paediatric liver centre

AIM

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is an acute deterioration of pre-existing chronic liver disease related to a precipitating event. We characterised paediatric ACLF at Birmingham Children's Hospital (BCH) utilising European Association of Liver Disease CLIF criteria, including prevalence, triggers and outcomes.

METHODS

All BCH patients from 2000 to 2020 with CLD who underwent initial liver transplant or died on the transplant waiting list or whilst too unwell to be listed were reviewed.

RESULTS

From 2000 to 2020, 24 (4%) children with ACLF were identified. Death occurred in 18 (75%). Transplant occurred in 9 (36%), 3 of which died. ACLF triggers were sepsis organism negative 11 (46%), sepsis organism positive 8 (33%) and GI bleed 5 (17%). Bilirubin at the time of transplant/death in those with ACLF who lived compared with those who died was 529 umol/L (381) versus 665 (210) (p=0.38), creatinine 138 umol/L (147) versus 67 (46) (p=0.41), PT 33 sec (14) versus (32 (15) (p = 0.72), Grade 3, 4 hepatic encephalopathy 1 (17%) versus 10 (56%) (p = 0.17), vasopressor use 1 (17%) versus 17 (94%) (p = 0.001) and ventilation 3 (50%) versus 17 (94%) (p = 0.035).

CONCLUSION

Acute-on-chronic liver failure whilst infrequent has high rates of mortality. The use of vasopressors and ventilation is more frequent in those who die from ACLF.

Kasai Procedure in Patients Older Than 90 Days: Worth a Cut

INTRODUCTION

 Age at Kasai portoenterostomy (KPE) has been identified as a predictive factor for native-liver survival in patients with biliary atresia (BA). Outcomes of pediatric liver transplantation (LT) have improved over recent years. It has been proposed to consider primary LT as a treatment option for late-presenting BA infants instead of attempting KPE. We present our experience with patients older than 90 days undergoing KPE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 A retrospective chart review of patients with BA undergoing KPE at our institution between January 2010 and December 2020 was performed. Patients 90 days and older at the time of surgery were included. Patients' characteristics, perioperative data, and follow-up results were collected. Eleven patients matched the inclusion criteria. Mean age at KPE was 108 days (range: 90-133 days).

RESULTS

 Postoperative jaundice clearance (bilirubin < 2 mg/dL) at 2-year follow-up was achieved in three patients (27%). Eight patients (73%) received a liver transplant at a mean of 626 days (range: 57-2,109 days) after KPE. Four patients (36%) were transplanted within 12 months post-KPE. Two patients died 237 and 139 days after KPE due to disease-related complications. One patient is still alive with his native liver, currently 10 years old.

CONCLUSION

 Even when performed at an advanced age, KPE can help prolong native-liver survival in BA patients and offers an important bridge to transplant. In our opinion, it continues to represent a viable primary treatment option for late-presenting infants with BA.

Acute-on-chronic liver failure in children

Although various complex definitions of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) have been suggested in relation to adult patients, there is currently no universal definition of the syndrome in pediatric patients. In simplified terms, ACLF is characterized by the acute deterioration of the liver functions due to the effects of a precipitating factor on the basis of a chronic liver disease. Acute events and underlying liver diseases are very different in children from those seen in adults. Moreover, acute events and underlying chronic liver diseases vary among geographical regions, although it seems that the most common such diseases and acute events are autoimmune hepatitis, Wilson’s disease, and their flares. ACLF is associated with a poor prognosis. While no scoring systems have been developed to predict the prognosis for children with ACLF, modified versions of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the liver’s acute-on-chronic liver failure scoring system and the Chronic Liver Failure-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment criteria can be used in children until specific and validated scoring systems are available. Aside from liver transplantation, there is no proven treatment for ACLF. Thus, the early recognition of ACLF prior to the development of extrahepatic organ failure is important.

Living Donor Versus Deceased Donor Pediatric Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Reduced-size deceased donors and living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) can address the organ shortage for pediatric liver transplant candidates, but concerns regarding technical challenges and the risk of complications using these grafts have been raised. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes for pediatric LDLT and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) via systematic review.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies reporting outcomes of pediatric (<18 y) LDLT and DDLT published between 2005 and 2019. A meta-analysis was conducted to examine peri- and postoperative outcomes using fixed- and random-effects models.

RESULTS

Overall, 2518 abstracts were screened, and 10 studies met criteria for inclusion. In total, 1622 LDLT and 6326 DDLT pediatric patients from 4 continents were examined. LDLT resulted in superior patient survival when compared with DDLT at 1, 3, and 5 y post-LT (1-y hazard ratio: 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-0.73, P < 0.0001). Similarly, LDLT resulted in superior graft survival at all time points post-LT when compared with DDLT (1-y hazard ratio: 0.56 [95% CI 0.46-0.68], P < 0.0001]. The OR for vascular complications was 0.73 (95% CI 0.39-1.39) and 1.31 (95% CI 0.92-1.86) for biliary complications in LDLT compared with DDLT, whereas LDLT was associated with lower rates of rejection (OR: 0.66 [95% CI 0.45-0.96], P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrates that LDLT may offer many advantages when compared with DDLT in children and suggests that LDLT should continue to be expanded to optimize outcomes for pediatric LT candidates.