Propranolol in the treatment of infantile haemangiomas: lessons from the European Propranolol In the Treatment of Complicated Haemangiomas (PITCH) Taskforce survey

Long-Term Results of Oral Propranolol Treatment Protocol for Periocular Infantile Hemangioma: Should There Be Any Contraindication?

PURPOSE

The authors report long-term results of the oral propranolol treatment protocol for periocular infantile hemangioma regardless of conventional indications.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study (2008-2018) on children with propranolol treatment protocol for periocular infantile hemangioma and last follow-up (FU) of ≥4 months after treatment and age of >24 months. After systemic evaluation, it was started with 0.5 and increased by 0.5 every 3 days to reach 2 mg/kg/day. If there was no good response, it would be gradually increased up to 3 mg/kg/day. Tapering (0.5 mg/kg/day every 4 weeks) was started when patients were on treatment for ≥6 months and ≥12 months old and there was no change in the infantile hemangioma size for ≥3 months. Rebound growth was based on the parents' report and would be treated by increasing the dose to at least 2 mg/kg/day for 3 months. FU was either in-person or via social media. Change in periocular infantile hemangioma size on the photos was scored by 3 masked observers (visual analog scale) and presented as excellent (≥50% reduction), good (1%-49%), fair (no change), and failure (enlarged).

RESULTS

Forty-three patients were included. Orbital involvement was in 49%, ptosis in 58%, and risk of amblyopia in 63%. Mean treatment, tapering, and FU duration were 37, 13, and 74 months, respectively. Mean age at presentation, start of propranolol treatment protocol, tapering, stop, and last FU were 1.5, 5, 29, 42, and 78 months, respectively. Twenty-seven patients received 2, seven 2.5, and nine 3 mg/kg/day. Mean visual analog scale significantly increased from 43% (FU1) to 92% (last FU) when 97.6% of patients showed an excellent response. The remaining skin lesions were observed in 35%. No side effect was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term results of the propranolol treatment protocol for periocular infantile hemangioma showed an excellent response in 97.6% of patients with no side effects. A residual skin lesion was observed in 1/3 of the patient.

Cardiac side effects of propranolol in infants treated for infantile haemangiomas

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to add proof to the safety profile of propranolol as first-line choice in treating infantile haemangiomas, in particular related to its cardiac side effects the main hindering reason for parents and physicians to start and comply with treatment.

METHOD

This is a prospective observational and analytic study with a sample of 476 patients diagnosed with infantile haemangioma and treated with systemic propranolol during the time interval January 2011 to December 2021. We studied clinical propranolol adverse events experienced in hospital or outpatient and measured the impact of propranolol on blood pressure and heart rate.

RESULTS

This study showed that symptomatic adverse events caused by propranolol were mild and severe adverse events were rare. The most common clinical side effects were paleness, sweating, reduced feeding, and agitation. Only in 28 (5.9%) cases these symptoms were severe enough to review treatment, 1.8% had severe respiratory symptoms, 2.7% experienced hypoglycaemia, and 1.2% had heart-related symptoms. Mean blood pressure reduction with treatment was statistically significant only after achieving the maintenance dose 2 mg/kg body weight. Blood pressure under the 5th percentile was registered in 2.9% of cases, but only four patients had symptomatic hypotension. While heart rate reduction was noticed with the first dose, only two experienced symptomatic bradycardia.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that propranolol is not only an excellent drug in treating infantile haemangioma, but it has also a very safe profile, with mild side effects and very rare severe cardiac adverse events, easily overcome with treatment interruption.

Factors associated with early relapse of infantile haemangioma in children treated for at least six months with oral propranolol: A case-control study using the 2014-2021 French Ouest DataHub

BACKGROUND

The factors associated with early relapse of infantile haemangioma (IH) after a first course of treatment with oral propranolol for at least six months (initiated after the marketing authorization had been granted) have not previously been investigated.

OBJECTIVES

To identify factors associated with the risk of early relapse in children with IH treated with oral propranolol according to the current prescribing guidelines.

METHODS

We performed a multicentre, retrospective, case-control study, using the Ouest Data Hub database. All children treated for at least 6 months with oral propranolol for IH between 31 June 2014 and 31 December 2021, and with a follow-up visit at least three months after treatment discontinuation were included. A case was defined as relapse of IH within three months of treatment discontinuation; each case was matched for age at treatment initiation and for centre, with four (relapse-free) controls. The association between relapse and treatment or IH characteristics was expressed as an odds ratio (OR) from univariate and multivariate conditional logistic regressions.

RESULTS

A total of 225 children were included. Of these, 36 (16%) relapsed early. In a multivariate analysis, a deep IH component was a risk factor for early relapse [OR = 8.93; 95%CI: 1.0-78.9, p = 0.05]. A propranolol dosage level of less than 3 mg/kg/day protected against early relapse [OR = 0.11; 95%CI: 0.02-0.7, p = 0.02]. Tapering before propranolol discontinuation was not associated with a lower risk of early relapse.

CONCLUSION

The risk factors for late and early relapse are probably different. Investigation of the risk factors for early vs. late IH relapse is now warranted.

[Infantile hemangioma : Clinical manifestation, treatment, and differential diagnoses]

With an incidence of approximately 4% infantile hemangiomas are the most common vascular tumors in children and show characteristic growth dynamics. In order to avoid erroneous treatment, they need to be differentiated from other vascular tumors (granuloma pyogenicum and kaposiform hemangioendothelioma) and vascular malformations. Of all infantile hemangiomas 85% are uncomplicated and undergo spontaneous resolution starting towards the end of the first year of life. First-line treatment for complicated infantile hemangiomas (15%), i.e. those with imminent obstruction (eyes and nose), ulceration or permanent disfigurement, is oral propranolol (2 mg/kg BW and day for at least 6 months).

Management of infantile hemangiomas-experience of a tertiary hospital

The purpose of the study is to describe the experience of a multidisciplinary team in a tertiary hospital regarding the management of Infantile Hemangiomas (IH). The method employed is a retrospective analysis of patients with IH followed in a tertiary pediatric hospital between January 2010 and May 2022. A total of 393 IH were diagnosed (56.7% female), with a median age of 5 months (interquartile range (IQR), 3-10). Imaging investigation was necessary for diagnosis and for exclusion of other IH in 9.2% and 14.3%, respectively. Focal (74.0%) and superficial (59.7%) lesions were more frequent as was facial location (35.9%). Pre-treatment ulceration or hemorrhage occurred in 6.6%. At follow-up, 87.4% regressed partially and 12.6% completely; 2.7% relapsed. Propranolol was started in 30.0% of cases for a median period of 9 months (IQR, 6-12), mainly due to esthetic concerns (41.9%). Side effects occurred in 8.3% (sleep disturbance in 5.1%). Only 1.7% were refractory and 5.9% had a rebound effect. Eleven patients were treated with topical timolol and 41 underwent surgery. Patients that were treated with propranolol had more risk factors (p = 0.016) and presented deeper lesions (p < 0.001) with a larger diameter (p < 0.001); total IH regression was less frequent (p < 0.001). Since 2020, twice-daily dosage was more frequently prescribed than three times daily (p = 0.007) and inpatient initiation of propranolol decreased (p = 0.750), without significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions, duration of treatment, and lesion evolution.  Conclusions: Our protocol proved to be safe and feasible in an outpatient setting and twice daily administration of propranolol was effective. The majority of IH showed at least partial regression. Early detection of high-risk IH is paramount and a multidisciplinary assessment by a specialized team is essential for adequate management. What is Known: • IH are the most common vascular tumors in childhood. Although the majority evolves favorably, treatment may be warranted in selected cases. • Early detection of high-risk IH is paramount, and a multidisciplinary assessment by a specialized team is essential for adequate management. What is New: • One-third of our sample was treated with propranolol. These patients had more risk factors and presented deeper lesions with a larger diameter, and tumor total regression was less frequent. • Our results reinforce safety and feasibility of propranolol initiation in an outpatient setting, including twice daily dosage.

Monitoring oral propranolol for infantile hemangiomata

Treating infantile hemangiomas with oral propranolol may be initiated in accordance with various protocols some require hospitalization. However, different adverse events have been reported during treatment, thus it is of special importance to find a protocol which is both safe and feasible. We performed a retrospective cohort study of all cases of infantile hemangiomas treated with oral propranolol at our institute between January 2010 and February 2020. Pretreatment evaluation consisted of pediatric cardiologist evaluation including electrocardiography and echocardiography. The propranolol starting dosage was 0.5 mg/kg bid; 2 weeks later the dosage was escalated to 1 mg/kg bid. During the initiation and escalation visits, heart rate and blood pressure were measured before and every hour for a total of 3 h, and blood glucose level was measured within the first hour of treatment. A total of 131 children were treated during the study period. Scalp, facial and genital region infantile hemangiomas were more prevalent in regard to their relative body surface area. No symptomatic bradycardia, hypotension, hypoglycemia, or any other adverse events were documented; few patients had asymptomatic bradycardia and hypotension, which were more common in infants below 6-months of age. Only one patient had asymptomatic hypoglycemia, not requiring any intervention. Initiation and escalation of propranolol treatment for infantile hemangiomas proved to be safe, and without symptomatic adverse effects. However, considering the young age of the patients and the possible asymptomatic adverse reactions, we recommend the following simple protocol as presented, for pretreatment evaluation and short monitoring during treatment initiation and dose escalation.

Diagnosis of infantile subglottic hemangioma and the effect of oral propranolol

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the clinical characteristics of infantile subglottic hemangioma (SGH), and to observe the safety and efficacy of propranolol in the treatment of SGH.

METHODS

The data of 21 children diagnosed with SGH and treated with propranolol in our hospital from March 2013 to January 2021 were retrospectively analyzed and followed up.

RESULTS

Among the 21 cases, there were 7 males and 14 females. SGH was found 11 left-sided, 9 right-sided and 1 bilateral-sided. The clinical manifestations included stridor (13/21), respiratory distress (6/21), barking cough (5/21), feeding difficulty (4/21), three concave sign (4/21), cyanosis (2/21) and hoarseness (1/21). 8 patients had multiple cutaneous hemangiomas. The age of presentation ranged from 1 to 8 months, with a median of 1.1 months. 18 cases (85.7 %) had a history of misdiagnosis, 14 bronchitis/pneumonia, 5 laryngomalacia, 2 laryngeal obstruction and 1 asthma. The median ages at diagnosis were 3 months, with a range of 1.2-28 months. The treatment duration ranged from 6 to 25.6 months, with an average of (14.3 ± 4.9) months. Age at termination of treatment ranged from 9 to 38 months, with a median of 18.6 months, and only 2 cases were beyond 2 years old at that time. No adverse side effects from propranolol therapy occurred and all 21 cases were cured.

CONCLUSIONS

We advocate a strong index of suspicion for SGH presenting with respiratory symptoms under 2 years old who has poor effect or repeated condition after routine treatment. Laryngoscopy combined with contrast-enhanced CT can confirm the diagnosis of SGH. Oral propranolol is safe and effective, and that early diagnosis and intervention of propranolol without further delay are crucial to the successful management. We advocate continue propranolol treatment beyond 18 months of age, furthermore, 2 years old may be the best time for therapy termination.

Update on Treatment of Infantile Hemangiomas: What’s New in the Last Five Years?

Among benign vascular tumors of infancy, hemangiomas are the commonest, affecting approximately 5–10% of one-year-old children. They are derived from a benign proliferation of vascular endothelial cells (VECs) in the mesoderm and may arise anywhere on the body around 1–2 weeks after birth. Infantile hemangiomas (IHs) are characterized by an early proliferative phase in the first year followed by a spontaneous progressive regression within the following 5 years or longer. IH prevalence is estimated to be 5%–10% in one-year-old children and commonly affects female, Caucasian and low-birth weight infants. Although most of them spontaneously regress, approximately 10% requires treatment to prevent complications due to the site of occurrence such as bleeding, ulceration, cosmetically disfigurement, functional impairment, or life-threatening complications. For over 30 years, steroids have represented the first-line treatment for IHs, but recently topical or systemic β-blockers are increasingly being used and recognized as effective and safe. A search for “Cutaneous infantile hemangioma” [All Fields] AND “Treatment” [All Fields] was performed by using PubMed and EMBASE databases. Treatment of IHs with labeled drugs, such as oral propranolol, but also with off-label drugs, such as topical β-blockers, including topical timolol and carteolol, steroids, itraconazole or sirolimus, with a focus on formulations types and adverse events were described in our review. We also discussed the benefits of pulsed dye laser and the treatment of IHs with involvement of central nervous system, namely the PHACE and LUMBAR syndrome.

The VASCERN-VASCA working group diagnostic and management pathways for severe and/or rare infantile hemangiomas

The European Reference Network on Rare Multisystemic Vascular Diseases (VASCERN), is dedicated to gathering the best expertise in Europe and provide accessible cross-border healthcare to patients with rare vascular diseases. Infantile Hemangiomas (IH) are benign vascular tumors of infancy that rapidly growth in the first weeks of life, followed by stabilization and spontaneous regression. In rare cases the extent, the localization or the number of lesions may cause severe complications that need specific and careful management. Severe IH may be life-threatening due to airway obstruction, liver or cardiac failure or may harbor a risk of functional impairment, severe pain, and/or significant and permanent disfigurement. Rare IHs include syndromic variants associated with extracutaneous abnormalities (PHACE and LUMBAR syndromes), and large segmental hemangiomas. There are publications that focus on evidence-based medicine on propranolol treatment for IH and consensus statements on the management of rare infantile hemangiomas mostly focused on PHACES syndrome. The Vascular Anomalies Working Group (VASCA-WG) decided to develop a diagnostic and management pathway for severe and rare IHs with a Nominal Group Technique (NGT), a well-established, structured, multistep, facilitated group meeting technique used to generate consensus statements. The pathway was drawn following two face-to-face meetings and in multiple web meetings to facilitate discussion, and by mail to avoid the influence of most authoritative members. The VASCA-WG has produced this opinion statement reflecting strategies developed by experts and patient representatives on how to approach patients with severe and rare IH in a practical manner; we present an algorithmic view of the results of our work.

Does Oral Propranolol Improve the Final Outcome of All Involuted Infantile Hemangiomas? A Matched Retrospective Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

Oral propranolol can effectively activate and accelerate infantile hemangioma (IH) involution; however, could the final outcome of oral propranolol treatment for IHs commensurate that of spontaneous involution?

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the long-term therapeutic effect of oral propranolol for IHs.

METHODS

We present an individual matching comparative study with (1) oral propranolol therapy for mixed and deep IHs on the lips, nose, and parotid and (2) lesion type- and lesion location-matched untreated IHs as controls. Patients' follow-up photographs were assessed by 3 surgeons blinded of their treatment. Outcome measures were the quantification of the degree of sequelae ranging from 1 to 4 and the age at which IH achieved involution arrest.

RESULTS

Ten groups of oral propranolol and untreated patients with matched lesions were assessed. Average age at which lesions stabilized and reached no change in appearance was 1.7 years old and 6.3 years old for propranolol group and untreated group (t = 5.663, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the quantified degree of sequelae for oral propranolol group and untreated group upon follow-up (1.60 vs 1.40, respectively; t = 1.259, P = 0.240).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral propranolol therapy accelerates IH involution but does not have a superior effect than spontaneous involution on the overall outcome of problematic IHs.

Infantile Hemangioma: A Current Review

Infantile hemangiomas (IHs) are common vascular lesions which are benign but can cause significant functional and cosmetic morbidity. Since the fortuitous discovery of propranolol being effective to treat IH over a decade ago, the therapy and prognosis for children with IH have improved dramatically. Oral propranolol (as well as other oral beta-blockers and topical timolol) are safe and effective treatments, and have now supplanted other therapies. Making the correct diagnosis is crucial, because other vascular lesions can mimic IH. In addition, IH can be the first manifestation of an underlying syndrome. For IH requiring treatment, initiating treatment early is key to optimizing success. Therefore, early recognition and referral, if necessary, are important. Continued research on IH, both basic science and clinical, should result in continued advances.

Good Clinical Responders to Topical Timolol in Patients with Infantile Hemangiomas: A 7-Year Retrospective Study of 328 Korean Patients

Background

Topical timolol is widely used for treatment of superficial infantile hemangioma (IH). However, little is known about factors that affect the response to topical timolol treatment.

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy, safety, and predictive value for good response to topical timolol for IH.

Methods

A retrospective review of medical records and clinical photos of 328 patients with IH treated with topical timolol 0.5% solution was conducted. Serial clinical photographs were compared with those at the initial visit using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Treatment response was defined as an improvement of at least 75% from baseline in IH lesions within 12 months of treatment.

Results

Overall, IH patients treated with topical timolol showed significant improvement from baseline, showing that the final VAS score within 12 months of treatment was 69.7±20.4. The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed age at initiation of treatment (p=0.007), length of gestation and fetal growth (p=0.03), depth (p=0.01), and flexural area (p=0.007) were significantly associated with treatment response. Only four patients (1.1%) reported local irritation.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that topical timolol treatment was an effective and well-tolerated treatment for IHs. Physicians are encouraged to consider several patient- or lesional factors that might affect treatment response to achieve better clinical outcomes.

Noninferiority and Safety of Nadolol vs Propranolol in Infants With Infantile Hemangioma: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Propranolol for infantile hemangiomas (IH) has been shown to be effective and relatively safe. However, other less lipophilic β-blockers, such as nadolol, may be preferable in individuals who experience propranolol unresponsiveness or adverse events.

OBJECTIVE

To document the noninferiority and safety of oral nadolol compared with oral propranolol in infants with IH.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This double-blind noninferiority prospective study with a noninferiority margin of 10% compared propranolol with nadolol in infants aged 1 to 6 months with problematic IH. The study was conducted in 2 academic pediatric dermatology centers in Canada between 2016 and 2020. Infants aged 1 to 6 months with a hemangioma greater than 1.5 cm on the face or 3 cm or greater on another body part causing or with potential to cause functional impairment or cosmetic disfigurement.

INTERVENTIONS

Oral propranolol and nadolol in escalating doses up to 2 mg/kg/d.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURE

Between-group differences comparing changes in the bulk (size and extent) and color of the IH at week 24 with baseline using a 100-mm visual analog scale.

RESULTS

The study included 71 patients. Of these, 36 were treated with propranolol. The mean (SD) age in this group was 3.1 (1.4) months, and 31 individuals (86%) were female. Thirty-five infants were treated with nadolol. The mean (SD) age in this group was 3.2 (1.6) months, and 26 individuals (74%) were female. The difference in IH between groups by t test was 8.8 (95% CI, 2.7-14.9) for size and 17.1 (95% CI, 7.2-30.0) for color in favor of the nadolol group, demonstrating that nadolol was noninferior to propranolol. Similar differences were noted at 52 weeks: 6.0 (95% CI, 1.9-10.1) and 10.1 (95% CI, 2.9-17.4) for size and color improvement, respectively. For each doubling of time unit (week), the coefficient of involution was 2.4 (95% CI, 0.5-4.4) higher with nadolol compared with propranolol. Safety data were similar between the 2 interventions.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Oral nadolol was noninferior to oral propranolol, indicating it may be an efficacious and safe alternative in cases of propranolol unresponsiveness or adverse events, or when faster involution is required.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02505971.

Medical Management of Infantile Hemangiomas: An Update

Infantile hemangioma (IH) is the most common benign vascular tumor of infancy, affecting about 5% of infants. It has a characteristic growth pattern of early rapid proliferation followed by progressive involution. Although most IH evolve favorably, complications are observed in 10-15% of cases, justifying treatment. For over 10 years now, propranolol has become the first-line therapy for complicated IH, revolutionizing their management and their prognosis. In this article, we review the clinical features, associations, complications/sequelae and therapeutic approaches for IH, focusing on current medical therapy. Indications for treatment and various treatment options, including propranolol and other oral β-blockers, topical timolol, and corticosteroids are presented. Current controversies regarding oral propranolol such as pre-treatment screening, in- vs out-patient initiation of treatment, early and potential long-term side effects and recommended monitoring are discussed.

Non-β-blocker enantiomers of propranolol and atenolol inhibit vasculogenesis in infantile hemangioma

Propranolol and atenolol, current therapies for problematic infantile hemangioma (IH), are composed of R(+) and S(–) enantiomers: the R(+) enantiomer is largely devoid of beta blocker activity. We investigated the effect of R(+) enantiomers of propranolol and atenolol on the formation of IH-like blood vessels from hemangioma stem cells (HemSCs) in a murine xenograft model. Both R(+) enantiomers inhibited HemSC vessel formation in vivo. In vitro, similar to R(+) propranolol, both atenolol and its R(+) enantiomer inhibited HemSC to endothelial cell differentiation. As our previous work implicated the transcription factor sex-determining region Y (SRY) box transcription factor 18 (SOX18) in propranolol-mediated inhibition of HemSC to endothelial differentiation, we tested in parallel a known SOX18 small-molecule inhibitor (Sm4) and show that this compound inhibited HemSC vessel formation in vivo with efficacy similar to that seen with the R(+) enantiomers. We next examined how R(+) propranolol alters SOX18 transcriptional activity. Using a suite of biochemical, biophysical, and quantitative molecular imaging assays, we show that R(+) propranolol directly interfered with SOX18 target gene trans-activation, disrupted SOX18-chromatin binding dynamics, and reduced SOX18 dimer formation. We propose that the R(+) enantiomers of widely used beta blockers could be repurposed to increase the efficiency of current IH treatment and lower adverse associated side effects.

Design and Evaluation of Dissolving Microneedles for Enhanced Dermal Delivery of Propranolol Hydrochloride

Oral propranolol hydrochloride has been the first-line treatment for infantile hemangioma (IH), whereas systemic exposure to propranolol has the potential of causing serious adverse reactions. Dermal delivery of propranolol is preferable due to high local drug concentration and fewer adverse effects. However, propranolol hydrochloride (BCS class I) is highly hydrophilic and has difficulty in penetrating the stratum corneum (SC) barrier. Dissolving microneedles (MNs) are an efficient tool for overcoming the barrier of the SC and enhancing dermal drug delivery. In this study, propranolol hydrochloride-loaded dissolving MNs were fabricated by using hyaluronic acid and polyvinyl pyrrolidone as matrix materials. Controllable drug loading in needle tips was achieved by a two-step casting procedure. The needles were good in mechanical strength for penetrating the SC while presented excellent dissolving capability for releasing propranolol hydrochloride. In comparison with the solution counterpart, irrespective of being applied to intact skin or solid MNs-pretreated skin, dissolving MNs significantly increased the permeability and skin retention of propranolol. In conclusion, dissolving MNs could be a potential approach for enhancing dermal delivery of propranolol to treat IH.

Propranolol for infantile hemangioma: Evaluating efficacy and predictors of response and rebound growth

Propranolol emerged as the first-line therapy for infantile hemangioma (IH). Determinants of interindividual variation in drug response and predictors of rebound growth after drug discontinuation are yet to be firmly established. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of a relatively large cohort of patients with IH treated by propranolol and to determine predictors of (a) an excellent response to treatment (≥90 improvement) and (b) of rebound growth after drug cessation. A retrospective cohort study was conducted to follow all patients with IH receiving systemic propranolol in a referral center-based specialized clinic. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of excellent response and rebound growth. The study included 206 patients who completed oral propranolol treatment. The mean (SD) age in which the drug was initiated was 4.8 (3.1) months. The average improvement rate was estimated at 85.5 (13.8)%. Initiation of propranolol at the age of 0 to 3 (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 3.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25-9.40; P = .016) and 3 to 6 (adjusted OR, 3.71; 95% CI, 1.50-9.19; P = .005) months was associated with an increased likelihood of excellent response. Twenty-four (11.7%) patients developed rebound growth following cessation of propranolol. No significant predictors of rebound were identified in the multivariate analysis. Eleven (5.3%) patients experienced mild adverse events, which necessitated drug discontinuation in only two (1.0%) patients. Propranolol is highly effective and safe based on the real-life experience of a referral center for IH. The current study supports early initiation of propranolol.

News on infantile haemangioma. Part 2: therapy and evaluation

Infantile haemangioma (IH) is the most frequently occurring tumour of childhood. While benign, in more than half of the cases, less or more severe sequelae can be observed. In Part 1 of this review, we discussed the clinical course and pathomechanism of IHs. In Part 2 of this state-of-the-art review, we will discuss the current management of IH and focus on the working mechanism of β-blockers in IHs. Furthermore, we will discuss options for the evaluation of patients and their families (quality of life and family burden), as well as for the evaluation of IHs by healthcare providers, such as assessments of activity and severity. This review will update the reader on the working mechanism of propranolol in IHs and offer an oversight of tools (questionnaires and scoring systems) that can be used in clinical practice or for research.

Infantile Hemangioma: An Updated Review

BACKGROUND

Infantile hemangiomas are the most common vascular tumors of infancy, affecting up to 12% of infants by the first year of life.

OBJECTIVE

To familiarize physicians with the natural history, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management of infantile hemangiomas.

METHODS

A Pubmed search was conducted in November 2019 in Clinical Queries using the key term "infantile hemangioma". The search strategy included meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, observational studies, and reviews published within the past 20 years. Only papers published in the English literature were included in this review. The information retrieved from the above search was used in the compilation of the present article.

RESULTS

The majority of infantile hemangiomas are not present at birth. They often appear in the first few weeks of life as areas of pallor, followed by telangiectatic or faint red patches. Then, they grow rapidly in the first 3 to 6 months of life. Superficial lesions are bright red, protuberant, bosselated, or with a smooth surface, and sharply demarcated. Deep lesions are bluish and dome-shaped. Infantile hemangiomas continue to grow until 9 to 12 months of age, at which time the growth rate slows down to parallel the growth of the child. Involution typically begins by the time the child is a year old. Approximately 50% of infantile hemangiomas will show complete involution by the time a child reaches age 5; 70% will have disappeared by age 7; and 95% will have regressed by 10 to 12 years of age. The majority of infantile hemangiomas require no treatment. Treatment options include oral propranolol, topical timolol, and oral corticosteroids. Indications for active intervention include hemorrhage unresponsive to treatment, impending ulceration in areas where serious complications might ensue, interference with vital structures, life- or function-threatening complications, and significant disfigurement.

CONCLUSION

Treatment should be individualized, depending upon the size, rate of growth, morphology, number, and location of the lesion (s), existing or potential complications, benefits and adverse events associated with the treatment, age of the patient, level of parental concern, and the physician's comfort level with the various treatment options. Currently, oral propranolol is the treatment of choice for high-risk and complicated infantile hemangiomas. Topical timolol may be considered for superficial infantile hemangiomas that need to be treated and for complicated infantile hemangiomas in patients at risk for severe adverse events from oral administration of propranolol.

Hemangiol in infantile haemangioma: A paediatric post-marketing surveillance drug study

AIM

Infantile haemangioma (IH) is the most common benign tumour in children. Since 2014, propranolol has become the first-choice therapy and currently Hemangiol is the only approved drug for complicated haemangioma. This post-marketing study reports the use of Hemangiol for IH in paediatric practice.

METHOD AND RESULTS

From January 2014 to November 2018, 94 children (median age 4 [0; 21] months; 75% female) treated with Hemangiol for proliferative IH were enrolled in the study. The systematic paediatric cardiology consultation never contraindicated beta-blockers. Two Hemangiol initiation protocols were used: a conventional ambulatory 3-week titration phase protocol (n = 76, 80.9%), and a rapid initiation protocol with a 48-hour dose escalation in conventional hospitalization for severe proliferative or ulcerated IH (n = 18, 19.1%). In both protocols, the haemodynamic tolerance was good. The mean maintenance dose of Hemangiol was 2.7 ± 0.8 mg/kg/day, with a median treatment duration of 7 [1.5; 19] months. Adverse events (AEs) have been found in 25 (26,6%) patients, including 8 (8.5%) patients with serious AEs (uncontrolled bronchial hyperreactivity, n = 5; serious hypoglycaemia, n = 3). Some patients had one or more AEs, a total of 24 nonserious AEs was reported in 19 patients (sleep disturbances, n = 9; respiratory disorders, n = 5; digestive disorders, n = 6). No cardiac adverse event was reported.

CONCLUSION

This post-marketing surveillance drug study supports the good tolerance of Hemangiol in children with IH. A rapid initiation protocol is of interest when treatment is urgent. The pretherapeutic paediatric cardiology consultation should not be systematic but only indicated for specific patients. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT04105517.

Retrospective case series of increased oral propranolol dosage for infantile hemangiomas

BACKGROUND

Infantile hemangiomas (IH) are the most common benign tumor of infancy. Although oral propranolol is currently first-line therapy, optimal dosing for treatment of IH remains debated. We sought to identify hemangioma characteristics associated with poor response to standard dosing (2 mg/kg/d) and to assess the therapeutic benefit of higher dosing.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review was conducted of 559 patients with IH seen at Johns Hopkins between 2008 and 2018, of whom 245 (44%) were treated with propranolol. Baseline characteristics were compared between patients who received increased propranolol dosing (≥2.5 mg/kg/d) and those who remained on standard dose (2 mg/kg/d). Changes in the Hemangioma Activity Score (HAS) during the increased dosage period were scored by two trained, blinded pediatric dermatologists.

RESULTS

Of 245 patients, 204 (83%) received standard 2 mg/kg/d propranolol dosing while 41 (17%) received a higher dose of ≥2.5 mg/kg/d. The most common location of IH in both groups was the face. In the increased dosage group, 85.4% of IH were of mixed or deep morphology with a mean greatest diameter of 4.6 cm. IH requiring increased dosing received longer courses of propranolol (mean of 389 vs. 282 days, P < .001) and underwent higher rates of excision by plastic surgery (26.8% vs. 5.9%, P < .001). Mean change in HAS over the period with dosage ≥2.5 mg/kg/d was minimal (-0.70; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Most recalcitrant IH were located on the face, larger in diameter, and of mixed or deep morphology. Patients had little improvement in HAS score with increased propranolol dosing implemented late in the treatment course with over one-fourth ultimately receiving surgical excision.

Ulcerated Infantile Hemangioma of the Hard Palate: Diagnostic Treatment With Oral Propranolol

Infantile hemangiomas arising in the palate are rare. The authors describe a case of ulcerated infantile hemangioma of the hard palate with feeding difficulty. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of immunohistochemically diagnosed palatal infantile hemangioma successfully treated using oral propranolol.

Management of infantile hemangiomas during the COVID pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant shifts in patient care including a steep decline in ambulatory visits and a marked increase in the use of telemedicine. Infantile hemangiomas (IH) can require urgent evaluation and risk stratification to determine which infants need treatment and which can be managed with continued observation. For those requiring treatment, prompt initiation decreases morbidity and improves long-term outcomes. The Hemangioma Investigator Group has created consensus recommendations for management of IH via telemedicine. FDA/EMA-approved monitoring guidelines, clinical practice guidelines, and relevant, up-to-date publications regarding initiation and monitoring of beta-blocker therapy were used to inform the recommendations. Clinical decision-making guidelines about when telehealth is an appropriate alternative to in-office visits, including medication initiation, dosage changes, and ongoing evaluation, are included. The importance of communication with caregivers in the context of telemedicine is discussed, and online resources for both hemangioma education and propranolol therapy are provided.

Propranolol for Surgeons in the Treatment of Infantile Hemangiomas

INTRODUCTION

Beta-blocker (Propanolol or Timolol maleate) treatment of infantile hemangiomas (IH) is a safe and effective treatment in the outpatient setting. The authors report a single surgeon's initial experience with setting up an outpatient service of beta-blocker treatment for head and neck IH at a tertiary children's hospital.

METHODS

A prospective study of children with head and neck IHs commenced in January 2015 with the end point being December 2018. Each child started either oral propranolol (2 mg/kg/day) or topical Timolol 0.5%.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients commenced a beta-blocker during the study duration. The mean age at time of starting therapy was 9 months (range 3 weeks to 116 months). Four patients were older than 12 months at commencement. The mean duration of treatment was 9 months. The response to treatment was excellent or complete in 29% (n = 11), good in 50% (n = 18) and mild in 10% (n = 4). The non response rate was 10% (n = 4). No major adverse effects occurred but 29% (n = 11) experienced minor side effects.

CONCLUSION

Low dose propranolol and topical Timolol is been safe and easy to use for surgeons who may not be regular prescribers or unfamiliar with treating children with IHs with beta-blocker therapy. In patient monitoring is unnecessary and parents can be taught easily to recognise side effects. Treating children from the start builds a trusting relationship with the family before the child requesting cosmetic revision of the fibro-fatty remnant.

Influence of Cytochrome P450 2D6 Polymorphisms on the Efficacy of Oral Propranolol in Treating Infantile Hemangioma

Objective

The aim of this study is to evaluate the association of genetic polymorphisms in Cytochrome P450 2D6(CYP2D6) and the change in VEGF levels with the response to propranolol in patients with Infantile hemangiomas (IH).

Methods

IH patients who underwent over six months of propranolol therapy and received oral propranolol only were enrolled. The target dose of propranolol was 1 mg kg^-1day^-1. Deoxyribonucleic acid was obtained from venous blood leukocytes. Genotypes of CYP2D6 (rs1065852 and rs1135840) were tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and by sequencing the products. Baseline serum VEGF and serum VEGF one month after treatment were measured. The clinical responses after six months of treatment were evaluated. Genotypes of CYP2D6 (rs1065852 and rs1135840) and VEGF levels were compared between good responders and poor-to-moderate responders.

Results

72 patients were enrolled in the study. Patients with CYP2D6 (rs1135840) G/G homozygote had the highest response rate to propranolol. No significant association was found between the response rates and CYP2D6 (rs1065852) polymorphism. No significant differences were found in baseline serum VEGF, serum VEGF one month after treatment, and VEGF ratio between good responders and poor-to-moderate responders.

Conclusion

The response to propranolol treatment in IH patients was associated with the gene polymorphism of CYP2D6 (rs1135840). A low-dose propranolol regimen was effective and safe in young infants with IH. The change of serum VEGF levels after one month's treatment could not be used to predict the response rate to propranolol.

Identification of putative biomarkers for Infantile Hemangiomas and Propranolol treatment via data integration

Infantile hemangiomas (IHs) are the most common benign tumors in early childhood. They show a distinctive mechanism of tumor growth in which a rapid proliferative phase is followed by a regression phase (involution). Propranolol is an approved treatment for IHs, but its mechanism of action remains unclear. We integrated and harmonized microRNA and mRNA transcriptome data from newly generated microarray data on IHs with publicly available data on toxicological transcriptomics from propranolol exposure, and with microRNA data from IHs and propranolol exposure. We identified subsets of putative biomarkers for proliferation and involution as well as a small set of putative biomarkers for propranolol's mechanism of action for IHs, namely EPAS1, LASP1, SLC25A23, MYO1B, and ALDH1A1. Based on our integrative data approach and confirmatory experiments, we concluded that hypoxia in IHs is regulated by EPAS1 (HIF-2α) instead of HIF-1α, and also that propranolol-induced apoptosis in endothelial cells may occur via mitochondrial stress.

Oral propranolol in the treatment of proliferating infantile haemangiomas: British Society for Paediatric Dermatology consensus guidelines

BACKGROUND

Infantile haemangiomas (IH) are the most common vascular tumours of infancy. Despite their frequency and potential complications, there are currently no unified U.K. guidelines for the treatment of IH with propranolol. There are still uncertainties and diverse opinions regarding indications, pretreatment investigations, its use in PHACES (posterior fossa malformations-haemangiomas-arterial anomalies-cardiac defects-eye abnormalities-sternal cleft and supraumbilical raphe) syndrome and cessation of treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To provide unified guidelines for the treatment of IH with propranolol.

METHODS

This study used a modified Delphi technique, which involved an international treatment survey, a systematic evidence review of the literature, a face-to-face multidisciplinary panel meeting and anonymous voting.

RESULTS

The expert panel achieved consensus on 47 statements in eight categories, including indications and contraindications for starting propranolol, pretreatment investigations, starting and target dose, monitoring of adverse effects, the use of propranolol in PHACES syndrome and how to stop treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

These consensus guidelines will help to standardize and simplify the treatment of IH with oral propranolol across the U.K. and assist in clinical decision-making.

Lip Infantile Hemangiomas Involving the Vermillion Border Have Worse Outcomes and Prognosis to Oral Propranolol Than Lesions Confined to One Side of the Vermillion

PURPOSE

Oral propranolol has been widely used for problematic infantile hemangiomas (IHs). Lip IHs present a high risk of disfigurement and associated psychosocial dysfunction and require early treatment. Lips are compound parts that consist of the upper and lower lips and include the mucosal and cutaneous lips histologically. The present retrospective study aimed to determine the response and prognosis of different subtypes of lip IHs to the use of systemic propranolol.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The data from 81 patients with lip IHs treated with systemic propranolol (2 mg/kg/day) were reviewed. Localized and segmental lip IHs were evaluated separately. The outcomes and prognosis of localized hemangiomas were further evaluated stratified by different features: 1) upper and lower lip; and 2) crossing the vermilion border.

RESULTS

The lesions involving the upper lips and those involving the lower lips had the same outcomes and prognosis. Lesions involving the vermillion border required longer treatment and had poorer outcomes and prognosis compared with lesions confined to 1 side of the vermilion.

CONCLUSIONS

After oral propranolol treatment, IHs localized to upper lip had the same outcomes and prognosis as IHs localized to the lower lip. Lip IHs involving the vermillion border had worse outcomes and prognosis than lesions confined to 1 side of the vermillion.

No Increased Risks Associated with Propranolol Treatment for Infantile Hemangioma in Preterm Infants were Identified at 3 Years of Age

BACKGROUND

Concerns have been raised that propranolol treatment of infantile hemangioma (IH) may be associated with increased risks of adverse effects and growth impairment in preterm infants due to their immature development.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to find out whether treatment of IH with propranolol in preterm infants is associated with higher incidences of long-term adverse effects and growth impairment in comparison with term infants.

METHODS

The clinical data of 55 preterm infants and 180 term infants with IH treated with oral propranolol for 6 months were retrospectively collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

The preterm and term patients did not differ significantly in terms of the general characteristics and adverse effect incidence (all p > 0.05). Height, weight, and head circumference of the preterm infants at ages 1, 2, and 3 years did not differ significantly from the normal references (all p > 0.05). In the term patients, only 1-year-old female weight and head circumference were significantly higher than the normal references (both p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Treatment of IH with propranolol for 6 months did not increase the risks for adverse effects or growth impairment up to age 3 years in preterm versus term patients in our study.

Clinical and economic impact of surgery for treating infantile hemangiomas in the era of propranolol: overview of single-center experience from La Paz Hospital, Madrid

Propranolol has changed the management of infantile hemangiomas (IHs). We summarize the evolution of surgical treatment for IH at La Paz Children's Hospital (Madrid) in the era of propranolol, with a focus on hepatic IHs.Retrospectively, we compared surgical treatment of IHs in children referred during the periods 2004-2009 and 2009-2014. Hepatic IH mortality rates before and after the introduction of propranolol therapy were evaluated specifically.The majority of hemangiomas needing surgical excision were located on the head/face/scalp of female patients. Since the introduction of propranolol therapy, surgery for IH has decreased from about 60 to 6 procedures/year at our institution and no transplants for hepatic IH have been registered.Conclusions: Surgical procedures for IH have decreased by about 90% at our institution since the introduction of propranolol treatment and hepatic IH have not needed liver transplantation. Referrals for surgery for IH are generally the consequence of absent or delayed propranolol treatment. Given the significant reduction in the number of surgical procedures, propranolol can be considered as having a strong economic and social impact. What is Known: • The use of oral propranolol solution is currently considered as the treatment of choice in the management of infantile hemangiomas. • Propranolol treatment achieves better outcomes and less side effects than systemic corticosteroids. What is New: • Social and financial impact of the significant reduction in the number of reconstructive surgical procedures and liver transplants due to the use of propranolol in tertiary health institutions remains to be analyzed.

Topical Timolol Vs. Oral Propranolol for the Treatment of Superficial Infantile Hemangiomas

Objective: Infantile hemangiomas (IHs) are the most common vascular tumors of infancy. Oral propranolol has achieved great success in treating IHs since 2008. To minimize the systemic side events caused by oral administration of propranolol, topical timolol started to be applied in the treatment of IHs, especially for superficial lesions.

Methods: We treated 724 children with superficial IHs using oral propranolol or topical timolol, and investigated the efficacy and safety of the two treatment patterns.

Results: Both oral propranolol and topical timolol achieved a satisfactory therapeutic outcome, with an effective response rate of 97 and 96.4%, respectively. No significant differences in visual analog scale (VAS) improvement between the two groups were observed. Occurrence rate of systemic adverse events for patients treated with oral propranolol (3.9%) was significantly higher than that for patients treated with topical timolol (0%). Clinical response was not associated with gender, duration of treatment, lesion location, lesion size, gestational age, and progesterone use during pregnancy, but closely associated with age at treatment initiation, which indicated that younger age at treatment initiation predicted for a better regression rate.

Conclusions: We recommend that topical timolol instead of oral propranolol could be the first-line therapy for superficial IHs because of its good efficacy and improved safety.

Efficacy and safety of oral atenolol for the treatment of infantile haemangioma: A systematic review

Recently, several studies have reported their experience in using oral atenolol in patients with infantile haemangioma (IH), especially as an alternative to propranolol, but the efficacy and safety of oral atenolol has not been evaluated. We searched PubMed (Medline), Central, Embase, Web of Science and EBSCOhost (until May 2018) for the eligible studies reporting more than 10 IH patients who were treated with oral atenolol with detailed original data, including outcomes, regimens and adverse events (AEs). The data was standardised and analysed by using R software with meta-package. A total of 9 of 141 identified articles, including 341 infantile haemangioma patients treated with oral atenolol therapy, were included. The pooled response rate of atenolol was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85-0.93), and the rebound rate was 0.11 (95% CI: 0.08-0.16). Among the 341 patients, 44 patients were switched to atenolol therapy from propranolol due to adverse events. The response rate of subsequent atenolol treatment was 90.9% (40/44). Regarding AEs, 141 patients reported 177 episodes of AEs, and the pooled rate was 0.26 (95% CI: 0.12-0.47). Gastrointestinal symptoms (e.g. constipation, diarrhoea and vomiting) were the most frequent AEs (22.6%). Widely known propranolol-related AEs, including hypoglycaemia, bronchospasm, bradycardia and hypotension, were not recorded. Overall, atenolol appears to be an effective and safe therapy for the treatment of IH and may be a promising alternative to propranolol.

Oral propranolol therapy in 23 infants with infantile hemangioma

Background

Infantile hemangioma (IH) is a common vascular tumor in pediatric patients, and is commonly treated with propranolol. We describe our experiences with dosage, response to treatment, and side effects in 23 IH patients treated with propranolol.

Methods

For this nonrandomized comparative cohort study, the authors enrolled 23 patients treated with propranolol. Photographs were taken before propranolol administration and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after treatment. Treatment responses were objectively analyzed with a computer program.

Results

There were three male and 20 female patients. Common tumor locations were the head and neck (13 cases, 56.5%), trunk (four cases, 17.4%), extremities (three cases, 13.0%), and combined locations (three cases, 13.0%). The response to propranolol was significantly lower in patients with two or more lesions than in patients with a single lesion in terms of both color fading (P<0.001) and size reduction (P<0.001). In male patients (42.2±3.9), the change in a-values, indicating coloration, was higher than in female patients (19.8 ±13.8)(P<0.001). In patients who started treatment before 6 months after birth, the size reduction was greater than in their counterparts (62.3%; range, 3.0%–93.0% vs. 15.8%; range, 1.0%–79.0%; P<0.001).

Conclusions

Propranolol is an efficacious treatment with a good safety profile. In patients with a single lesion, the response to treatment was better in terms of color fading and size reduction. Furthermore, male patients responded better to propranolol treatment in terms of color fading than female patients, and starting treatment before 6 months after birth was more advantageous for size reduction.

Beyond endothelial cells: Vascular endothelial growth factors in heart, vascular anomalies and placenta

Vascular endothelial growth factors regulate vascular and lymphatic growth. Dysregulation of VEGF signaling is connected to many pathological states, including hemangiomas, arteriovenous malformations and placental abnormalities. In heart, VEGF gene transfer induces myocardial angiogenesis. Besides vascular and lymphatic endothelial cells, VEGFs affect multiple other cell types. Understanding VEGF biology and its paracrine signaling properties will offer new targets for novel treatments of several diseases.

Oral propranolol for infantile hemangiomas beyond the proliferative phase

Infantile hemangiomas grow rapidly during infancy followed by gradual involution. After involution, residual lesions sometimes remain. Despite the prognosis for eventual involution, infantile hemangiomas often cause great psychosocial morbidity that affects patients and their parents. Oral propranolol usually induces earlier involution and redness reduction in infantile hemangiomas in the proliferative phase. However, to evaluate the effectiveness of oral propranolol for infantile hemangiomas beyond the proliferative phase is difficult because of spontaneous regression. We report five Japanese patients treated with 2 mg/kg per day of oral propranolol for infantile hemangiomas beyond the proliferative phase and compared with three untreated patients. After the oral propranolol treatment for 25 weeks, all the treated patients exhibited earlier color fading than untreated patients. Four patients reached nearly complete resolution. Adverse events occurred in three patients: cold, exanthema subitum and suspected of bronchial asthma, respectively. The propranolol treatment for the patient with suspected of bronchial asthma was suspended for 4 months. Recurrence after termination of treatment was not seen. Oral propranolol (2 mg/kg per day) is a safe and effective treatment for Japanese patients with infantile hemangiomas beyond the proliferative phase.

Infantile Periocular Haemangioma: Optimising the Therapeutic Response

Oral propranolol is now established as the first-line treatment for infantile haemangiomas, and used in up to 20 % of all cases. Propranolol use in infants is most commonly instigated in a controlled environment to monitor for potential serious adverse events such as hypoglycaemia and hypotension. Two test doses are recommended, the first one of 300 μg/kg followed by 2-hourly monitoring. On the subsequent day, a further dose of 650 μg/kg is administered with the same monitoring. A dose of 2 mg/kg divided into three is started from the next day. Parents/carers need to be warned of common adverse effects, of which disturbed sleep is the commonest. Treatment is recommended for up to a year to avoid rebound growth and the need to restart the treatment.