Cardiorenal outcomes by indices of liver steatosis and fibrosis in individuals with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: Analyses from VERTIS CV, a randomized trial of the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor ertugliflozin

Non-invasive tools for liver steatosis and steatohepatitis predict incidence of diabetes, cardiovascular disease and mortality 20 years later: The ATTICA cohort study (2002-2022)

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) or, as recently renamed, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), has common metabolic pathways with diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Non-invasive tools (NITs) for liver steatosis and steatohepatitis (MASH) were studied as potential predictors of diabetes, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality over a 20-year period.

METHODS

In 2001-02, 3042 individuals from the Attica region of Greece were recruited randomly, and were stratified by subgroups of sex, age and region to reflect the general urban population in Athens, Greece. Validated NITs for hepatic steatosis (Hepatic Steatosis Index (HIS), Fatty Liver Index (FLI), Lipid Accumulation Product (LAP), NAFLD liver fat score (NAFLD-LFS)) and steatohepatitis (Index of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (ION), aminotransferase-creatinine-clearance non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (acNASH)) were calculated. Incidence of diabetes, CVD and mortality were recorded 5, 10 and 20 years later.

RESULTS

Within a 20-year observation period, the diabetes and CVD incidence was 26.3% and 36.1%, respectively. All hepatic steatosis and steatohepatitis NITs were independently associated with diabetes incidence. ION and acNASH presented independent association with CVD incidence [(Hazard Ratio (HR)per 1 standard deviation (SD) = 1.33, 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI) (1.07, 1.99)) and (HRper 1 SD = 1.77, 95% CI (1.05, 2.59)), respectively]. NAFLD-LFS which is a steatosis NIT indicating features of steatohepatitis, was linked with increased CVD mortality (HRper 1 SD = 1.35, 95% CI (1.00, 2.30)) and all-cause mortality (HRper 1 SD = 1.43, 95% CI (1.08, 2.01)). Overall, steatohepatitis NITs (i.e., ION and acNASH) presented stronger associations with the outcomes of interest compared with steatosis NITs. Clinically important trends were observed in relation to diabetes and CVD incidence progressively over time, i.e. 5, 10 and 20 years after baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Easily applicable and low-cost NITs representing steatohepatitis may be early predictors of diabetes and CVD onset. More importantly, these NITs increased the attributable risk conveyed by conventional CVD risk factors by 10%. Thus, their potential inclusion in clinical practice and guidelines should be studied further.

Association of Hepatic Steatosis and Fibrosis Indices With Insulin Sensitivity and Inflammation in the POP-ABC Study

Context

The cardiometabolic significance of subclinical liver fat in otherwise healthy individuals is unclear.

Objective

This work aimed to evaluate the association of hepatic steatosis/fibrosis with cardiometabolic risk markers and incident prediabetes among healthy adults.

Methods

This is a post hoc analysis of data from the Pathobiology of Prediabetes in a Biracial Cohort (POP-ABC) study. The participants underwent assessments, including clinical examination, oral glucose tolerance test, insulin sensitivity, insulin secretion, plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), and adiponectin levels, with the primary outcome of incident prediabetes during 5-year follow-up. Liver steatosis and fibrosis were assessed using the hepatic steatosis index (HSI) and the Fibrosis-4 (Fib-4) index, and participants were stratified by baseline quartiles (Q) of each index.

Results

Among 343 (193 African American, 150 European American) participants (mean age 44.2 ± 10.6 years, body mass index 30.2 ± 7.28, fasting glucose 91.8 ± 6.80 mg/dL, and 2-hour glucose 125 ± 26.5 mg/dL), the mean baseline HSI was 39.7 ± 8.21 and Fib-4 index was 0.80 ± 0.41. Baseline HSI correlated with insulin sensitivity (r = -0.44; P < .0001), hsCRP (r = 0.37; P < .0001), and adiponectin (r = -0.24; P < .0001), as did Fib-4 index: insulin sensitivity (r = 0.14; P = .046), hsCRP (r = -0.17; P = .0021), adiponectin (r = -0.22; P < .0001). During 5 years of follow-up, prediabetes occurred in 16.2%, 21.6%, 31.5%, and 30.6% among participants in Q1 to Q4 of baseline HSI, respectively (log-rank P = .02). The prediabetes hazard ratio was 1.138 (95% CI, 1.027-1.261) for baseline HSI.

Conclusion

Among initially normoglycemic individuals, hepatic steatosis predicted progression to prediabetes, probably via mechanisms that involve insulin resistance and inflammation.

Making Sense of the Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Clinical Practice Guidelines: What Clinicians Need to Know

Standards of care summarized in clinical practice guidelines for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) offer clinicians a streamlined diagnostic and management approach based on the best available evidence. These recommendations have changed a great deal in recent years; today, there is a clear focus on screening for the early identification and risk stratification of patients at high risk of steatohepatitis and clinically significant fibrosis to promote timely referrals to specialty care when needed. This article reviews and provides the rationale for current guidelines for NAFLD screening, diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring and addresses barriers to providing evidence-based NAFLD care and how to overcome them. The current paradigm of care calls for primary care clinicians and specialists to work together, within a multidisciplinary care team familiar with obesity and diabetes care, to provide comprehensive management of these complex patients.

Why do some glucose-lowering agents improve non-alcoholic fatty liver disease whereas others do not? A narrative review in search of a unifying hypothesis

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) are metabolic disorders connected by common pathophysiological mechanisms. Since insulin resistance (IR) and metabolic alterations are common to both conditions, almost all glucose-lowering agents which improve IR have also been studied in patients with NAFLD. Some have shown great efficacy, others none. Thus, the mechanisms behind the efficacy of these drugs in improving hepatic steatosis, steatohepatitis, and eventually fibrosis remain controversial. Glycaemic control improves T2D, but probably has limited effects on NAFLD, as all glucose-lowering agents ameliorate glucose control but only a few improve NAFLD features. In contrast, drugs that either improve adipose tissue function, reduce lipid ingestion, or increase lipid oxidation are particularly effective in NAFLD. We therefore hypothesise that improved free fatty acid metabolism may be the unifying mechanism behind the efficacy of some glucose-lowering agents on NAFLD and may represent the key to NAFLD treatment.

The first external validation of the Dallas steatosis index in biopsy-proven Non-alcoholic fatty liver Disease: A multicenter study

AIMS

A new non-invasive tool (NIT) for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) proposed in 2022 by the multi-ethnic Dallas Heart Study, i.e. the Dallas Steatosis Index (DSI), was validated herein using for the first time the gold standard i.e. liver biopsy-proven NAFLD.

METHODS

This is a multicenter study based on samples and data from two Gastroenterology-Hepatology Clinics (Greece and Australia) and one Bariatric-Metabolic Surgery Clinic (Italy). Overall, n = 455 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD (n = 374) and biopsy-proven controls (n = 81) were recruited.

RESULTS

The ability of DSI to correctly classify participants as NAFLD or controls was very good, reaching an Area Under the Curve (AUC) = 0.887. The cut-off point that could best differentiate the presence vs. absence of NAFLD corresponded to DSI = 0.0 (risk threshold: 50% | Sensitivity: 0.88; Positive Predictive Value (PPV): 93.0%; F1-score = 0.91). DSI demonstrated significantly better performance characteristics than other liver steatosis indexes. Decision curve analysis revealed that the benefit of DSI as a marker to indicate the need for invasive liver assessment was confirmed only when higher DSI values, i.e. ≥ 1.4, were used as risk thresholds. DSI performance to differentiate disease progression was inadequate (all AUCs < 0.700).

CONCLUSIONS

DSI is more useful for disease screening (NAFLD vs. controls) than to differentiate diseases stages or progression. The value of any inclusion of DSI to guidelines needs to be further studied.

Ertugliflozin Delays Insulin Initiation and Reduces Insulin Dose Requirements in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Analyses From VERTIS CV

CONTEXT

VERTIS CV evaluated the cardiovascular safety of ertugliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of these analyses was to assess the insulin requirements of VERTIS CV patients over the trial duration.

METHODS

Patients received ertugliflozin 5 mg, 15 mg, or placebo once daily; mean follow-up was 3.5 years. Time to insulin initiation in patients who were insulin naïve at baseline, change in insulin dose in patients receiving baseline insulin, and hypoglycemia incidence in both patient groups were assessed.

RESULTS

In VERTIS CV, mean duration of type 2 diabetes was 13.0 years; glycated hemoglobin was 8.2%. Among 4348 (53%) insulin-naïve patients, the likelihood of insulin initiation was significantly reduced with ertugliflozin vs placebo (ertugliflozin 5 mg: hazard ratio [HR] 0.70, 95% CI 0.58-0.84; ertugliflozin 15 mg: HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.53-0.78). Time to insulin initiation was delayed with ertugliflozin; the estimated delay in reaching a 10% cumulative incidence of new insulin initiations vs placebo was 399 days with ertugliflozin 5 mg and 669 days with ertugliflozin 15 mg. Among 3898 (47%) patients receiving baseline insulin, the likelihood of requiring a ≥20% increase in insulin dose was significantly reduced with ertugliflozin vs placebo (ertugliflozin 5 mg: HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.52-0.75; ertugliflozin 15 mg: HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.41-0.62). The incidence of hypoglycemia events was not increased with ertugliflozin treatment.

CONCLUSION

In VERTIS CV patients, ertugliflozin reduced the likelihood of insulin initiation, delayed the time to insulin initiation by up to ∼1.8 years, and reduced insulin dose requirements vs placebo, without increasing hypoglycemia events.