Cross-reacting recombinant porcine FVIII inhibitors in patients with acquired haemophilia A

Diagnosis and laboratory monitoring of hemophilia A

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare disorder in which autoantibodies against factor VIII (FVIII) lead to a bleeding phenotype that varies from life-threatening to no bleeding at all. Prolonged activated partial thromboplastin times (APTT) in patients with a bleeding phenotype should be investigated to rule out AHA and should never be ignored in a preprocedure patient. Most inhibitors in AHA are heat and time dependent, so mixing studies performed only on an immediate mix are not useful: both lupus anticoagulants and treatment with direct oral anticoagulants can coexist with AHA and confound the diagnosis. Assays for intrinsic coagulation factors and von Willebrand factor should always be performed, regardless of the results of mixing studies. A Bethesda or modified Bethesda assay should be performed to quantify any inhibitor, and if susoctocog alfa (rpFVIII) is available, then an assay for cross-reacting antibodies should also be performed. At diagnosis and until complete remission, if the FVIII in the patient sample is >5 IU/dL, heat inactivation should be performed before the inhibitor assays are performed. While there are no conventional tests available to measure the effects of FVIII bypassing therapies, newer therapies may require monitoring, or their effects may need to be considered when choosing appropriate assays. Measurement of rpFVIII requires a 1-stage clotting assay, and measurement of patient FVIII while on emicizumab requires a chromogenic assay that does not contain human FX. Close communication is required between the treating clinicians and the laboratory to ensure that the correct tests are performed while patients are receiving treatments.

Immunogenicity of Therapeutic Biological Modalities - Lessons from Hemophilia A Therapies

The introduction and development of biologics such as therapeutic proteins, gene-, and cell-based therapy have revolutionized the scope of treatment for many diseases. However, a significant portion of the patients develop unwanted immune reactions against these novel biological modalities, referred to as immunogenicity, and no longer benefit from the treatments. In the current review, using Hemophilia A (HA) therapy as an example, we will discuss the immunogenicity issue of multiple biological modalities. Currently, the number of therapeutic modalities that are approved or recently explored to treat HA, a hereditary bleeding disorder, is increasing rapidly. These include, but are not limited to, recombinant factor VIII proteins, PEGylated FVIII, FVIII Fc fusion protein, bispecific monoclonal antibodies, gene replacement therapy, gene editing therapy, and cell-based therapy. They offer the patients a broader range of more advanced and effective treatment options, yet immunogenicity remains the most critical complication in the management of this disorder. Recent advances in strategies to manage and mitigate immunogenicity will also be reviewed.

Surgery and Prophylaxis with Susoctocog-Alfa in Acquired Hemophilia: Case Series and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare bleeding disease due to autoantibodies directed against clotting factor VIII (FVIII). Treatment of AHA consists of inhibitor eradication with immunosuppressive therapy (IST) and prompt control of bleeding obtained with bypassing agents or recombinant porcine FVIII (rpFVIII). The latter has recently been licensed for management of acute bleeding in AHA. Unlike treatment with bypassing agents, rpFVIII can be monitored to provide a successful hemostatic effect and avoid overtreatment. Correlation between rpFVIII inhibitor titers and efficacy of rpFVIII treatment remains a matter of debate.

METHODS

We report three cases of AHA in which rpFVIII was successfully used with an unconventional schedule despite the presence of medium-high titers of the rpFVIII. The modified Nijmegen-Bethesda inhibitor assay (NBA) was used to dose porcine FVIII inhibitors.

RESULT

The presence of rpFVIII inhibitors prior to the exposition to susoctocog-alfa, that may suggest a cross-reactivity with human FVIII inhibitors, did not affect hemostasis.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, rpFVIII demonstrates safety and efficacy in the presence of rpFVIII inhibitors and using an unconventional schedule in both the perioperative and outpatient settings. Laboratory measurement of inhibitors against rpFVIII during treatment is described for the first time.

Recombinant porcine factor VIII: Lessons from the past and place in the management of hemophilia A with inhibitors in 2021

The most serious complication of factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy is the occurrence of anti-FVIII alloantibodies that can strongly reduce or abolish the effect of human FVIII products. Bypassing agents to control bleeding episodes are recommended for these patients, but their efficacy is difficult to predict and monitor. FVIII products derived from porcine plasma had an important role in the treatment of hemophilia A for 50 years, from 1954 to 2004. Indeed, porcine FVIII could achieve hemostasis in patients in whom human FVIII products were ineffective. A recombinant porcine FVIII product is now available. This highly purified protein has the same biochemical and hemostatic properties, but much lower risks of infection and toxicity compared with plasma-derived porcine FVIII. The product is licensed in the United States and Europe for the treatment of acquired hemophilia A. However, this recombinant molecule could also be of clinical interest for people with inherited hemophilia A and inhibitors, particularly for the management of bleeding episodes in people receiving emicizumab as prophylactic treatment in the absence of anti-porcine FVIII antibodies.