Atrial fibrillation in older inpatients: are there any differences in clinical characteristics and pharmacological treatment between the frail and the non-frail?

Assessment and Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Older Adults with Frailty

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major driver of morbidity and mortality among older adults with frailty. Moreover, frailty is highly prevalent in older adults with AF. Understanding and addressing the needs of frail older adults with AF is imperative to guide clinicians caring for older adults. In this review, we summarize current evidence to support the assessment and management of older adults with AF and frailty, incorporating numerous recent landmark trials and studies in the context of the 2023 US AF guideline.

Implication of different frailty criteria in older people with atrial fibrillation: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

the prevalence of physical and multidimensional frailty and their prognostic impact on clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

to evaluated frailty in a cohort of patients with AF according to different criteria, and studied the prevalence and its prognostic impact on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

in this multicenter prospective cohort, 197 inpatients ≥ 65 years old with AF were recruited from September 2018 to April 2019.We used Fried Frailty phenotype (Fried) to assess physical frailty, and comprehensive geriatric assessment-frailty index (CGA-FI) to assess multidimensional frailty. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality or rehospitalization.

RESULTS

the prevalence of frailty was determined as 34.5% by Fried, 42.6% by CGA-FI. Malnutrition and ≥ 7 medications were independently associated with frailty. Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that the presence of frailty by CGA-FI had significantly lower all-cause mortality or rehospitalization survival rate (log-rank P = 0.04) within 1 year. Multivariate Cox regression adjusted for age and sex showed that the frailty by CGA-FI was significantly associated with the risk of all-cause mortality or rehospitalization within 1 year (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.10-2.90). However, those associations were absent with the physical frailty. After broader multivariate adjustment, those associations were no longer statistically significant for both types of frailty.

CONCLUSIONS

in older people with AF, Multidimensional frailty is more significantly associated with a composite of all-cause mortality or rehospitalization within 1 year than physical frailty, but these association are attenuated after multivariate adjustment.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR1800017204; date of registration: 07/18/2018.

EHRA expert consensus document on the management of arrhythmias in frailty syndrome, endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), Latin America Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS), and Cardiac Arrhythmia Society of Southern Africa (CASSA)

There is an increasing proportion of the general population surviving to old age with significant chronic disease, multi-morbidity, and disability. The prevalence of pre-frail state and frailty syndrome increases exponentially with advancing age and is associated with greater morbidity, disability, hospitalization, institutionalization, mortality, and health care resource use. Frailty represents a global problem, making early identification, evaluation, and treatment to prevent the cascade of events leading from functional decline to disability and death, one of the challenges of geriatric and general medicine. Cardiac arrhythmias are common in advancing age, chronic illness, and frailty and include a broad spectrum of rhythm and conduction abnormalities. However, no systematic studies or recommendations on the management of arrhythmias are available specifically for the elderly and frail population, and the uptake of many effective antiarrhythmic therapies in these patients remains the slowest. This European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document focuses on the biology of frailty, common comorbidities, and methods of assessing frailty, in respect to a specific issue of arrhythmias and conduction disease, provide evidence base advice on the management of arrhythmias in patients with frailty syndrome, and identifies knowledge gaps and directions for future research.

Impact of frailty models on the prescription of oral anticoagulants and on the incidence of stroke, bleeding, and mortality in older patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Frailty is common in older patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Current guidelines recommend oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) except in case of severe frailty or reduced life expectancy, but definitive evidence on which "frailty" tools may help to identify older AF patients expected to derive little or no benefit from OAT is still lacking. Some persistent uncertainties may derive from the different clinical implications that the two major models of frailty, namely the frail phenotype (FP) and the deficit accumulation model (DAM), underlie. We thus conducted a systematic review of published studies to examine the association of the presence of frailty, categorized according to the FP and DAM, with 1) OAT prescription and 2) incidence of clinical outcomes (all-cause mortality, stroke and/or systemic embolism and major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding) in patients receiving OAT.

METHODS

Embase and MEDLINE were searched from inception until May 31st, 2022, for studies using a validated tool to identify frailty in subjects aged 65 years or older with a diagnosis of non-valvular AF; only studies on patients prescribed an OAT were considered eligible for the analyses involving clinical outcomes. The protocols for each review question have been registered in PROSPERO database (CRD42022308623 and CRD42022308628).

FINDINGS

Twenty-three studies exploring the association between frailty and OAT prescription on a total of 504 719 subjects were included. Patients with increasing severity of DAM frailty showed consistently lower OAT prescription rates than non-frail patients, whereas use of OAT did not significantly differ between patients with the FP compared with non-frail subjects. Eleven studies exploring the association between frailty and clinical outcomes on a total of 41 985 individuals receiving oral anticoagulation were included. Compared with non-frail subjects, a higher risk of all-cause mortality and clinical outcomes could be observed for AF patients prescribed with OAT with severe frailty according to the DAM, with inconclusive findings for the FP. High levels of heterogeneity were observed in both groups of studies; therefore, a meta-analysis was not performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the great heterogeneity among different validated frailty measures, indiscriminately relying on "frailty" should not be regarded as the gold standard for clinical decision-making about stroke prevention in older AF patients. Present findings suggest that severe frailty according to the DAM is associated with less use of OAT and increased risk of all-cause mortality, thereby representing at the moment the most reasonable tool to efficiently recognize patients with limited life expectancy and for whom there is so far scant, if any, evidence of a clinical benefit of OAT.

Epidemiology and impact of frailty in patients with atrial fibrillation in Europe

BACKGROUND

Frailty is a medical syndrome characterised by reduced physiological reserve and increased vulnerability to stressors. Data regarding the relationship between frailty and atrial fibrillation (AF) are still inconsistent.

OBJECTIVES

We aim to perform a comprehensive evaluation of frailty in a large European cohort of AF patients.

METHODS

A 40-item frailty index (FI) was built according to the accumulation of deficits model in the AF patients enrolled in the ESC-EHRA EORP-AF General Long-Term Registry. Association of baseline characteristics, clinical management, quality of life, healthcare resources use and risk of outcomes with frailty was examined.

RESULTS

Among 10,177 patients [mean age (standard deviation) 69.0 (11.4) years, 4,103 (40.3%) females], 6,066 (59.6%) were pre-frail and 2,172 (21.3%) were frail, whereas only 1,939 (19.1%) were considered robust. Baseline thromboembolic and bleeding risks were independently associated with increasing FI. Frail patients with AF were less likely to be treated with oral anticoagulants (OACs) (odds ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.55-0.89), especially with non-vitamin K antagonist OACs and managed with a rhythm control strategy, compared with robust patients. Increasing frailty was associated with a higher risk for all outcomes examined, with a non-linear exponential relationship. The use of OAC was associated with a lower risk of outcomes, except in patients with very/extremely high frailty.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large cohort of AF patients, there was a high burden of frailty, influencing clinical management and risk of adverse outcomes. The clinical benefit of OAC is maintained in patients with high frailty, but not in very high/extremely frail ones.

The prevalence of frailty and pre-frailty among geriatric hospital inpatients and its association with economic prosperity and healthcare expenditure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 467,779 geriatric hospital inpatients

BACKGROUND

Frailty is a common and clinically significant condition among geriatric populations. Although well-evidenced pooled estimates of the prevalence of frailty exist within various settings and populations, presently there are none assessing the overall prevalence of frailty among geriatric hospital inpatients. The purpose of this review was to systematically search and analyse the prevalence of frailty among geriatric hospital inpatients within the literature and examine its associations with national economic indicators.

METHODS

Systematic searches were conducted on Ovid, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL Plus, and the Cochrane Library, encompassing all literature published prior to 22 November 2018, supplemented with manual reference searches. Included studies utilised a validated operational definition of frailty, reported the prevalence of frailty, had a minimum age ≥ 65 years, attempted to assess the whole ward/clinical population, and occurred among hospital inpatients. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality.

RESULTS

Ninety-six studies with a pooled sample of 467,779 geriatric hospital inpatients were included. The median critical appraisal score was 8/9 (range 7-9). The pooled prevalence of frailty, and pre-frailty, among geriatric hospital inpatients was 47.4% (95% CI 43.7-51.1%), and 25.8% (95% CI 22.0-29.6%), respectively. Significant differences were observed in the prevalence of frailty stratified by age, prevalent morbidity, ward type, clinical population, and operational definition. No significant differences were observed in stratified analyses by sex or continent, or significant associations between the prevalence of frailty and economic indicators.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty is highly prevalent among geriatric hospital inpatients. High heterogeneity exists within this setting based on various clinical and demographic characteristics. Pooled estimates reported in this review place the prevalence of frailty among geriatric hospital inpatients between that reported for community-dwelling older adults and older adults in nursing homes, outlining an increase in the relative prevalence of frailty with progression through the healthcare system.

Frailty prevalence and impact on outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 1,187,000 patients

Frailty is a clinical syndrome characterized by a reduced physiologic reserve, increased vulnerability to stressors and an increased risk of adverse outcomes. People with atrial fibrillation (AF) are often burdened by frailty due to biological, clinical, and social factors. The prevalence of frailty, its management and association with major outcomes in AF patients are still not well quantified. We systematically searched PubMed and EMBASE, from inception to September 13th, 2021, for studies reporting the prevalence of frailty in AF patients. The study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021235854). 33 studies were included in the systematic review (n = 1,187,651 patients). The frailty pooled prevalence was 39.7 % (95 %CI=29.9 %-50.5 %, I² =100 %), while meta-regression analyses showed it is influenced by age, history of stroke, and geographical location. Meta-regression analyses showed that OAC prescription was influenced by study-level mean age, baseline thromboembolic risk, and study setting. Frail AF patients were associated with a higher risk of all-cause death (OR=5.56, 95 %CI=3.46-8.94), ischemic stroke (OR=1.59, 95 %CI=1.00-2.52), and bleeding (OR=1.64, 95 %CI=1.11-2.41), when compared to robust individuals. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the prevalence of frailty was high in patients with AF. Frailty may influence the prognosis and management of AF patients, thus requiring person-tailored interventions in a holistic or integrated approach to AF care.

Impact of geriatric syndromes on anticoagulation prescription in older adults with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in older adults. CHA2DS2-VASC (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 (doubled), diabetes mellitus, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (doubled), vascular disease, age 65-74, female) and HASBLED(Hypertension, Abnormal Renal/Liver Function, Stroke, Bleeding History or Predisposition, Labile INR, Elderly, Drugs/Alcohol Concomitantly) are the most established risk stratification tools in assessing suitability for anticoagulation in AF. However, there are no established screening tools for geriatric syndromes on anticoagulation risks in older adults.

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the association of anticoagulation prescription with geriatric syndromes.

METHODS

Older adults 65 years and above admitted to a tertiary hospital with atrial fibrillation and CHA2DS2-VASC score ≥ 2. Data on demographics, function (modified Barthel's Index (MBI)), cognition (mini-cog), frailty (Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS) and FRAIL), geriatric syndromes (EFS), sarcopenia (SARC-F), HASBLED and CHA2DS2-VASC were collected.

RESULTS

150 patients aged 65 and above (mean age 79.4 ± 7.1 years) with AF were recruited. 101 (67%) participants were anticoagulated, in univariate analysis comparing those who were anticoagulated with those who were not, age (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.89-0.99), chronic kidney disease (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.19-0.80), frailty (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.60-0.98) and functional status by Barthel's Index (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.57-0.97) were significantly associated with anticoagulation prescription. In multivariate analysis, age (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.88-0.99) and CKD (OR 0.35; 95% CI 0.16-0.76) remained significant. There was no significant difference in CHA2DS2-VASC, HASBLED, MBI or falls between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Age and CKD were significantly associated with anticoagulation prescription in patients with AF. Further studies on the impact of geriatric syndromes on anticoagulation prescription and outcomes in older adults are needed with specific guidelines for patients with geriatric syndromes and AF.

Prevalence of Frailty and Associations with Oral Anticoagulant Prescribing in Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Frailty is often cited as a factor influencing oral anticoagulation (OAC) prescription in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). We sought to determine the prevalence of frailty and its association with OAC prescription in older veterans with NVAF.

METHODS

We used ICD-9 codes in Veterans Affairs (VA) records and Medicare claims data to identify patients with NVAF and CHA2DS2VASC ≥2 receiving care between February 2010 and September 2015. We examined rates of OAC prescription, further stratified by direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) or vitamin K antagonist (VKA). Participants were characterized into 3 categories: non-frail, pre-frail, and frail based on a validated 30-item EHR-derived frailty index. We examined relations between frailty and OAC receipt; and frailty and type of OAC prescribed in regression models adjusted for factors related to OAC prescription.

RESULTS

Of 308,664 veterans with NVAF and a CHA2DS2VASC score ≥2, 121,839 (39%) were prescribed OAC (73% VKA). The mean age was 77.7 (9.6) years; CHA2DS2VASC and ATRIA scores were 4.6 (1.6) and 5.0 (2.9) respectively. Approximately a third (38%) were frail, another third (32%) were pre-frail, and the remainder were not frail. Veterans prescribed OAC were younger, had higher bleeding risk, and were less likely to be frail than participants not receiving OAC (all p's<0.001). After adjustment for factors associated with OAC use, pre-frail (OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.87-0.91) and frail (OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.64-0.68) veterans were significantly less likely to be prescribed OAC than non-frail veterans. Of those prescribed OAC, pre-frail (OR:1.27, 95% CI: 1.22-1.31) and frail (OR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.67-1.83) veterans were significantly more likely than non-frail veterans to be prescribed a DOAC than a VKA.

CONCLUSIONS

There are high rates of frailty among older veterans with NVAF. Frailty using an EHR-derived index is associated with decreased OAC prescription.

Atrial fibrillation and acceleration of frailty: findings from the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing

INTRODUCTION

both atrial fibrillation (AF) and frailty are increasingly prevalent with age. Cross-sectional studies have suggested a relationship between AF and frailty, but longitudinal data are lacking. We explored if the presence of AF was associated with accelerated progression of frailty over 8 years in community-dwelling older adults.

METHODS

a longitudinal retrospective case-control study was conducted using data from Waves 1 and 5 of the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA). Participants with electrocardiographically detected AF at Wave 1 were matched to controls without AF (1:2) based on age and gender. Frailty was assessed using both the frailty phenotype (FP) and a 31-item frailty index (FI). Change in cases' and controls' FP and FI scores from Waves 1 to 5 were modelled using repeated measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA).

RESULTS

one hundred eighteen TILDA participants with AF at Wave 1 were matched to 236 controls. By FP, participants with AF were not significantly more frail than controls at Wave 1 (P = 0.166) but were at Wave 5 (P = 0.011), and RM-ANOVA suggested that frailty progressed more in participants with AF between Waves 1 and 5 compared with controls (P = 0.033). By FI, participants with AF were significantly more frail at Wave 1 (P < 0.001) and 5 (P = 0.010), and RM-ANOVA did not show a difference in frailty progression between groups (P = 0.955).

CONCLUSION

AF may drive the development of the FP. The FP is a pre-disability syndrome and hence may be better than the FI as a focus for disability prevention in adults with AF.

Geriatric conditions do not predict stroke or bleeding in long-term care residents with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Long-term care (LTC) providers prescribe anticoagulation (AC) less frequently in residents with atrial fibrillation (AF) and geriatric conditions independent of CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc stroke risk score. Geriatric conditions include recent fall, activities of daily living dependency, mobility impairment, cognitive impairment, low body mass index, and weight loss. Multiple publications have suggested that patients with geriatric conditions are at increased risk for stroke. Understanding better the risk of stroke and bleeding in residents with AF and geriatric conditions would be valuable to LTC providers for AC decision-making.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We measured the association of geriatric conditions with composite of stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA)/systemic embolism and bleeding in residents with AF and elevated stroke risk (CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc score ≥ 2) living in American LTC facilities in 2015. After merging nursing home assessments (Minimum Data Set) with medication and hospital utilization records, we identified 209,413 eligible residents. Using generalized estimating equations, we found that the incidence of stroke/TIA/systemic embolism ranged from 0.13% to 0.26% over 30 days (1.43%-3.08%/year) in residents off AC with and without geriatric conditions adjusting for other resident characteristics including CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc score and propensity to receive AC. Similarly, the monthly incidence of bleeding on AC ranged from 0.22% to 0.28% (2.61%-3.31%/year) without increased risk with geriatric conditions. Residents with a CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc score of ≥7 had a 2.4-fold increased risk of stroke compared with those with score of 2-4 (0.30% vs. 0.12%/month).

CONCLUSION

Calculating a CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc score can be helpful in AC decision-making for residents with and without geriatric conditions.

Outcomes of anticoagulant prescribing for older patients with atrial fibrillation depends on disability level provided by long-term care insurance

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients aged ≥75 is one of the major risk factors for stroke, and prescription of oral anticoagulants (OACs) should be considered in these patients. We investigated the use of OAC' for patients certificated for long-term care (LTC) insurance, who have a high risk of bleeding among older patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From 1169 consecutive inpatients aged 75 or older who were admitted to the geriatric ward of The University of Tokyo Hospital between 2012 and 2017, we identified 175 patients (men 48%, mean age 85.5 years) who had AF during admission. The patients' background, prescription of OACs on discharge, and the level of LTC insurance were checked. Patients were followed up for 1 to 5 years. Major bleeding, stroke, and all-cause mortality were investigated as outcomes. Among patients with AF, 63.4% were taking OACs. In multivariate analysis, older age, low BMI and no history of stroke were significant factors for not prescribing OACs. Care level patients with OACs had a higher incidence of stroke than others. There was no difference, irrespective of OAC prescription and disability level, in incidence of major bleeding. Care level patients without OACs had higher mortality than others.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that older care level patients with AF may benefit less from OACs.

The CHA2DS2-VASc score and Geriatric Multidimensional Assessment tools in elderly patients with persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing electrical cardioversion. A link with arrhythmia relapse?

INTRODUCTION

The CHA₂DS₂-VASc score is widely used for stroke risk stratification in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Our endpoints were to evaluate in an old population undergoing electrical cardioversion (ECV) of persistent AF if the CHA₂DS₂-VASc was associated with some of the Geriatric Multidimensional Assessment tools and with the presence of sinus rhythm at the follow-up.

METHODS

We enrolled all the consecutive patients admitted in a day-hospital setting aged ≥60 years. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE; neurocognitive function), the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS; depressive symptoms) and the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB; physical functioning) were administered before ECV.

RESULTS

Between 2017 and 2019, 134 patients were enrolled (mean age: 77±9 years, range: 60-96; men: 63.4%; EF: 60±12%). Hypertension was the most frequent comorbid condition (82.1%). The CHA₂DS₂-VASc score was 3.8±1.6. Abnormal values of MMSE, GDS and SPPB were observed in 7.9, 19.8 and 22.3% of cases, respectively. There were significant correlations between the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score and the MMSE (p=0.008), the GDS (p<0.001) and the SPPB (p<0.001). Depressive symptoms increased CHA₂DS₂-VASc correlation with SPPB of about 20%. CHA₂DS₂-VASc score was higher in patients with arrhythmia relapse (p=0.048; mean length of follow-up: 195 days). This association persisted even after adjustment for amiodarone therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The CHA₂DS₂-VASc score significantly correlated with neuro-cognitive performance, depressive symptoms and physical functioning. It was also associated with AF relapse. Accordingly, in the elderly, the CHA₂DS₂-VASc could help quantify thrombo-embolic risk, give an indication of frailty status and help to choose between a rate- and a rhythm-control strategy.

Modified Frailty as a Novel Factor in Predicting the Maintenance of the Sinus Rhythm After Electrical Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation in the Elderly Population

Introduction

Frailty is a common geriatric syndrome that causes an elevated risk of catastrophic declines in the health and function among older adults – we hypothesized that frailty may be related to the maintenance of sinus rhythm after cardioversion.

Methods

The study sample was a group of 199 consecutive patients over 60 (average age 71.41 ± 6.99; 40.2% women) with AF who were hospitalized in order to perform electrical cardioversion. The Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) was used to assess frailty before cardioversion. The six-month visit after the electrical cardioversion was a follow-up. The follow-up period for the maintenance of sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion was 180 ± 14 days.

Results

Patients in whom cardioversion was effective had a statistically significantly lower severity of frailty syndrome (3.44 ± 1.83 vs 5.87 ± 1.12; p=0.000) and its components: physical components (2.14 ± 1.33 vs 3.62 ± 1.05 p=0.000); emotional components (0.92 ± 0.79 vs 1.29 ± 0.86 p=0.037) and social components (0.37 ± 0.56 vs 0.96 ± 0.46; p=0.000) compared to those patients in which cardioversion was ineffective. In the logistic regression, frailty (OR: 0.65, 95% CI:0.5010–0.8330; p=0.000) was observed to be an independent predictor for maintaining sinus rhythm.

Conclusion

Frailty is a novel, independent factor that can be used to predict the effectiveness of electrical cardioversion and the maintenance of sinus rhythm in the elderly population. Modifying the level of recognition in the Tilburg Frailty Indicator to a 4 improved the prediction of the effectiveness of electrical cardioversion as well as the maintenance of sinus rhythm.

Direct oral anticoagulants for patients aged over 80 years in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: the impact of frailty

AIMS

In patients aged at least 80 years, atrial fibrillation is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality, with a high incidence of stroke. Four new direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been introduced in Italy for the prevention of thromboembolism. Their safety and efficacy in the elderly have already been confirmed. Frailty is frequently associated with aging, but only a few studies have paid attention to interactions between frailty and anticoagulation therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the effectiveness and safety of DOACs in a population aged at least 80 years. Frailty was appraised using an adaptation of the Reported Edmonton Frail Scale, considering a value at least 8 (on a scale from 0 to 18).

RESULTS

The majority (644/731) of patients remained on DOACs for more than 1 year. A total of 19 patients experienced a thrombotic event while on anticoagulation (1.11 events per 100 person-years) and 26 patients a major bleeding episode (1.52 events per 100 person-years). The probability of interrupting therapy increased significantly with frailty [hazard ratio 2.91 with confidence interval (CI) 2.15-3.92 at univariate analysis, hazard ratio 2.80 with CI 2.03-3.86 at multivariate]; frailty showed a significant impact also on major bleeding (hazard ratio 3.28 with CI 1.45-7.37 at univariate analysis, hazard ratio 3.56 with CI 1.58-8.01 at multivariate).

CONCLUSION

Our study highlights how DOACs are a safe and effective option for anticoagulation, even in frail elderly people; the introduction of these drugs is leading to an increased use of anticoagulation therapy in this population. Prospective trials will be needed to reinforce these results and to consider new variables in the thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk scores underlying the prescription of DOACs.

Frailty and Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients Aged 65 Years or Older with Atrial Fibrillation

Background: Elderly adults with atrial fibrillation (AF) are at increased risk of frailty and thromboembolic complications. However, studies on the prevalence of frailty in AF patients and data on the relationship between frailty and the use of anticoagulants are limited.Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study involving 500 participants. Patients aged 65 years or older were consecutively selected from the Chinese Atrial Fibrillation Registry study. The patient’s frailty status was assessed with use of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging Clinical Frailty Scale. We assessed the prevalence of and factors associated with frailty, and how frailty affects anticoagulant therapy.Results: In 500 elderly adults with AF (age 75.2±6.7 years; 51.6% female), 201 patients (40.2%) were frail. The prevalence of frailty was higher in females (P=0.002) and increased with age and CHA2DS2-VASc score (P for trend less than 0.001 for both). The factors associated with frailty were a history of heart failure (odds ratio [OR] 2.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39‐4.14), female sex (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.27‐3.43), and advanced age (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.09‐1.17). Frail patients were significantly less likely to have ever been prescribed anticoagulants compared with nonfrail patients (81.7 vs. 54.9%, P<0.001).Conclusions: Frailty is prevalent in elderly adults with AF, especially in females, those of advanced age, and those with heart failure. Frailty status has a significant impact on prescription of anticoagulants for high-risk AF patients.

Geriatric Elements and Oral Anticoagulant Prescribing in Older Atrial Fibrillation Patients: SAGE-AF

OBJECTIVES

Oral anticoagulants are the cornerstone of stroke prevention in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Geriatric elements, such as cognitive impairment and frailty, commonly occur in these patients and are often cited as reasons for not prescribing oral anticoagulants. We sought to systematically assess geriatric impairments in patients with AF and determine whether they were associated with oral anticoagulant prescribing.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the ongoing Systematic Assessment of Geriatric Elements in Atrial Fibrillation (SAGE-AF) prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Multicenter study with site locations in Massachusetts and Georgia that recruited participants from cardiology, electrophysiology, and primary care clinics from 2016 to 2018.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants with AF age 65 years or older, CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc (congestive heart failure; hypertension; aged ≥75 y [doubled]; diabetes mellitus; prior stroke, transient ischemic attack, or thromboembolism [doubled]; vascular disease; age 65-74; female sex) score of 2 or higher, and no oral anticoagulant contraindications (n = 1244).

MEASUREMENTS

A six-component geriatric assessment included validated measures of frailty, cognitive function, social support, depressive symptoms, vision, and hearing. Oral anticoagulant use was abstracted from the medical record.

RESULTS

A total of 1244 participants (mean age = 76 y; 49% female; 85% white) were enrolled; 42% were cognitively impaired, 14% frail, 53% pre-frail, 12% socially isolated, and 29% had depressive symptoms. Oral anticoagulants were prescribed to 86% of the cohort. Oral anticoagulant prescribing did not vary according to any of the geriatric elements (adjusted odds ratios [ORs] for oral anticoagulant prescribing and cognitive impairment: OR = .75; 95% confidence interval [CI] = .51-1.09; frail OR = .69; 95% CI = .35-1.36; social isolation OR = .90; 95% CI = .52-1.54; depression OR = .79; 95% CI = .49-1.27; visual impairment OR = .98; 95% CI = .65-1.48; and hearing impairment OR = 1.05; 95% CI = .71-1.54).

CONCLUSION

Geriatric impairments, particularly cognitive impairment and frailty, were common in our cohort, but treatment with oral anticoagulants did not differ by impairment status. These geriatric impairments are commonly cited as reasons for not prescribing oral anticoagulants, suggesting that prescribers may either be unaware or deliberately ignoring the presence of these factors in clinical settings. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:147-154, 2019.

Association of frailty and cognitive impairment with benefits of oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The incidence of cognitive impairment and frailty increase with age and may impact both therapy and outcomes in atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

We examined the prevalence of clinically recognized cognitive impairment and frailty (as defined by the American Geriatric Society Criteria) in the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Care in AF (ORBIT AF) and associated adjusted outcomes via multivariable Cox regression. The interaction between cognitive impairment and frailty and oral anticoagulation (OAC) in determining outcomes was examined.

RESULTS

Among 9749 patients with AF [median (IQR) age 75 (67-82) y, 57% male], cognitive impairment and frailty was identified in 293 (3.0%) and 575 (5.9%) patients respectively. Frail patients (68 vs 77%, P < .001) and those with cognitive impairment (70 vs 77%, P = .006) were both less likely to receive an OAC. Both cognitive impairment [HR (95% CI) 1.34 (1.05-1.72), P = .0198] and frailty [HR 1.29 (1.08-1.55), P = .0060] were associated with increased risk of death. Cognitive impairment and frailty were not associated with stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) or major bleeding. In multivariable analysis, there was no interaction between OAC use and cognitive impairment or frailty in their associations with mortality, major bleeding and a composite end point of stroke, non-central nervous system systemic embolism, TIA, myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death.

CONCLUSION

Those with cognitive impairment or frailty in AF had higher predicted risk for stroke and higher observed mortality, yet were less likely to be treated with OAC. Despite this, the benefits of OAC were similar in patients with and without cognitive impairment or frailty.

Reducing inappropriate prescribing for older adults with advanced frailty: A review based on a survey of practice in four countries

The management of medications in persons with frailty presents challenges. There is evidence of inappropriate prescribing and a lack of consensus among healthcare professionals on the judicious use of medications, particularly for patients with more severe frailty. This study reviews the evidence on the use of commonly prescribed pharmacological treatments in advanced frailty based on a questionnaire of prescribing practices and attitudes of healthcare professionals at different stages in their careers, in different countries. A convenience sample of those attending hospital grand rounds in Ireland, Canada and Australia/New Zealand (ANZ) were surveyed on the management of 18 medications in advanced frailty using a clinical vignette (man with severe dementia, Clinical Frailty Scale 7/9). Choices were to continue or discontinue (stop now or later) medications. In total, 298 respondents from Ireland (n = 124), Canada (n = 110), and ANZ (n = 64) completed the questionnaire, response rate 97%, including 81 consultants, 40 non-consultant hospital doctors, 134 general practitioners and 43 others (nurses, pharmacists, and medical students). Most felt that statins (88%), bisphosphonates (77%) and cholinesterase inhibitors (76%) should be discontinued. Thyroid replacement (88%), laxatives (83%) and paracetamol (81%) were most often continued. Respondents with experience in geriatric, palliative and dementia care were significantly more likely to discontinue medications. Age, gender and experience working in nursing homes did not contribute to the decision. Reflecting the current literature, there was no clear consensus on inappropriate prescribing, although respondents preferentially discontinued medications for secondary prevention. Experience significantly predicted the number and type discontinued, suggesting that education is important in reducing inappropriate prescribing for people in advanced states of frailty.

Management of atrial fibrillation for older people with frailty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

despite a large and growing population of older people with frailty and atrial fibrillation (AF), there is a lack of guidance on optimal AF management in this high-risk group.

OBJECTIVE

to synthesise the existing evidence base on the association between frailty, AF and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

a systematic review of studies examining the association between validated measures of frailty, AF and clinical outcomes, and meta-analysis of the association between frailty and oral anticoagulation (OAC) prescription.

RESULTS

twenty studies (30,883 patients) were included, all observational. Fifteen were in hospital, four in the community, one in nursing care. Risk of bias was low-to-moderate. AF prevalence was 3%-38%. In people with AF, frailty was associated with increased stroke incidence, all-cause mortality, symptom severity and length of hospital stay.Meta-analysis of six studies showed frailty was associated with decreased OAC prescription at hospital admission (pooled adjusted OR 0.45 [95%CI 0.22-0.93], three studies), but not at discharge (pooled adjusted OR 0.40 [95%CI 0.13-1.23], three studies). A community-based study showed increased OAC prescription associated with frailty (OR 2.33 [95%CI 1.03-5.23]).

CONCLUSION

frailty is common, and associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with AF. There is evidence of an association between frailty status and OAC prescription, with different direction of effect in community compared with hospital cohorts. Despite the majority of care for older people being provided in the community, there is a lack of evidence on the association between frailty, AF, anticoagulation and clinical outcomes to guide optimal care in this setting.

Stroke in the elderly

Stroke remains the second leading cause of death in the world, and its prevalence is projected to rise in the United States and globally. The main driver for increased stroke prevalence is aging of the population; however, best evidenced-based strategies for stroke treatment and prevention are not always followed for older patients. Furthermore, considerable gaps in knowledge exist for stroke prevention and treatment in elderly and very elderly patients. In this chapter, we discuss various aspects of stroke care in the elderly, including the evidence that guides stroke prevention and treatment. We focus on the challenges in managing stroke in the very elderly including the paucity of data to guide management. The sections span the continuum of stroke care, from primary prevention to management of stroke complications. Finally, we highlight the most significant unanswered questions regarding stroke care in the elderly.

Influence of frailty on anticoagulant prescription and clinical outcomes after 1-year follow-up in hospitalised older patients with atrial fibrillation

Frailty is an important prognostic factor in older adults with cardiovascular diseases. We aim to describe the characteristics of elderly hospitalised frail patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and to assess the influence of frailty, along with other functional and health status variables on anticoagulation prescription, 1-year all-cause mortality, and the incidence of ischemic and bleeding complications. An observational, prospective multicentre study was carried out on patients with NVAF over the age of 75, who were admitted to the Internal Medicine departments in Spain. A total of 615 patients were evaluated (mean age 85.23 ± 5.16 years, 54.3% females, 48.3% frail). Frail patients had higher CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores, more comorbidities and worse functional status and cognitive impairment compared to non-frail. During hospitalisation, 58 (9.4%) patients died (12.5% frail, 6.6% non-frail, p = 0.01). Among the participants discharged, 69.8% received anticoagulants, 13% anti-platelets only and 16.9% no anti-thrombotics, with no difference by frailty status. Frailty is not a predictor of anticoagulant prescription at discharge (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.55-1.57), while functional dependency remains significantly associated (OR for severe dependency 0.44, 95% CI 0.23-0.82). After the 1-year follow-up, frail patients have a higher risk of death (HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.43-2.76). Among patients taking anticoagulants, the incidence of stroke and major bleeding is similar between frailty groups. In our study, frailty is related to worse global health status. It has no impact on antithrombotic prescription, nor is a predictor of AF complications, even though frail subjects have a higher mortality during hospitalisation and after 1-year follow-up.

Association of polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy with frailty states: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate: (1) the cross-sectional association between polypharmacy, hyperpolypharmacy and presence of prefrailty or frailty; (2) the risk of incident prefrailty or frailty in persons with polypharmacy, and vice versa.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase from 01/01/1998 to 5/2/2018. Pooled estimates were obtained through random effect models and Mantel-Haenszel weighting. Homogeneity was assessed with the I² statistic and publication bias with Egger's and Begg's tests.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven studies were included. The pooled proportion of polypharmacy in persons with prefrailty and frailty was 47% (95% CI 33-61) and 59% (95% CI 42-76), respectively. Increased odds ratio of polypharmacy were seen for prefrail (pooled OR = 1.52; 95% CI 1.32-1.79) and frail persons (pooled OR = 2.62, 95% CI 1.81-3.79). Hyperpolypharmacy was also increased in prefrail (OR = 1.95; 95% CI 1.41-2.70) and frail (OR = 6.57; 95% CI 9.57-10.48) persons compared to robust persons. Only seven longitudinal studies reported data on the risk of either incident prefrailty or frailty in persons with baseline polypharmacy. A significant higher odds of developing prefrailty was found in robust persons with polypharmacy (pooled OR = 1.30; 95% CI 1.12-1.51). We found no papers investigating polypharmacy incidence in persons with prefrailty/frailty.

CONCLUSIONS

Polypharmacy is common in prefrail and frail persons, and these individuals are also more likely to be on extreme drug regimens, i.e. hyperpolypharmacy, than robust older persons. More research is needed to investigate the causal relationship between polypharmacy and frailty syndromes, thereby identifying ways to jointly reduce drug burden and prefrailty/frailty in these individuals.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018104756.

Frailty and atrial fibrillation: A systematic review

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia and its prevalence increases with age. There is a significant correlation between frailty, morbidity and mortality in elderly patients with cardiovascular disease, but the relation between AF and frailty is still under debate. The aim of this study is to systematically review evidence on the association between AF and frailty. A systematic review of articles published between 02/01/2002 and 09/28/2017 according to PRISMA recommendations was carried out. PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched for relevant articles. 11 studies were included; one longitudinal, 10 cross-sectional. Only 4 studies assessed the association of frailty with AF, while 7 studies were performed in a sample of participants with AF and did not provide any measure of association between these two conditions. The prevalence of frailty in AF patients ranged from 4.4%-75.4% while AF prevalence in the frail population ranged from 48.2%-75.4%. Selected studies enrolled an overall sample of 9420 participants. Among them, 2803 participants were diagnosed with AF and of these 1517 (54%) were frail and 1286 (46%) were pre-frail or robust. The four studies assessing the association of AF and frailty provided conflicting results. Evidence suggests that frailty is common in persons with AF. More research is needed to better assess the association of these conditions and to identify the optimal therapeutic approach to AF in persons with frailty.

Role of Geriatric Syndromes in the Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Older Adults: A Narrative Review

OBJECTIVES

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in older adults and associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events including thromboembolism. However, less is known about its association with noncardiovascular events, especially geriatric syndromes and conditions such as dementia, depression, impaired physical function, polypharmacy, falls, and poor quality of life. This review aims to help healthcare professionals integrate the special needs of older adults into their management of AF.

DESIGN

Nonsystematic review. A literature search on published articles on AF and geriatric syndromes and conditions was performed using the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE and SCOPUS, and DARE until December 2017. Non-English articles were excluded.

SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS

Older adults with and without AF from different settings.

MEASURES

Various cognitive, mood, and functional measurements were used in these studies. In studies regarding polypharmacy, the Beers or PRISCUS criteria were used to identify inappropriate medications. In quality of life measurements studies, instruments like Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 and Atrial Fibrillation Quality of Life questionnaire were used.

RESULTS

This literature review finds that AF has a substantial association with geriatric syndromes and conditions and that AF is a risk factor for the development of geriatric syndromes and conditions. Evidence is limited regarding the potential benefit of long-term treatment of AF in lowering the risk of developing geriatric syndromes and conditions.

CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS

Considering the impact of AF on cardiovascular outcomes and geriatric syndromes and conditions in older adults, healthcare professionals need to consider these complex dynamics while managing AF in older adults. An individual approach to AF management is needed in older adults with multiple comorbidity and polypharmacy that may help lower the risk of disease-disease, disease-drug, and drug-drug interactions. Special consideration needs to be given to patients' cognitive and functional impairment and ability to adhere to therapy.

What is the Impact of Frailty on Prescription of Anticoagulation in Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and frailty are both associated with advanced age. Oral anticoagulants (OAC) effectively prevent strokes in AF patients but are underutilized in the elderly, possibly due to misperception of frailty.

Objective

We performed a systematic review to determine the prevalence of frailty in patients with AF, and whether frailty was associated with reduced prescription of OAC.

Methods

We systematically searched Cochrane, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed databases. Search terms combined relevant words and MeSH headings: 1) atrial fibrillation, 2) frail elderly, and 3) geriatric assessments. Studies that measured frailty using a validated instrument, and involved OAC for AF in frail and non-frail patients were eligible for inclusion. Pooled odds ratios were calculated using random-effects model.

Results

Of 166 reviewed titles, only 3 studies (1204 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Two used the Reported Edmonton Frail Scale (total 509 patients), and one used the Canadian Study of Health and Aging Clinical Frailty Scale (682 patients). All 3 studies involved hospitalized patients with an average age of 85 ± 6 and 45% were male. The weighted mean prevalence of frailty in patients with atrial fibrillation was 39% (95%CI 36-42). The weighted mean rate of OAC use was 57±11%. Frailty was associated with non-prescription of OAC compared to non-frail (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.32-0.74, I2 =45%).

Conclusion

The prevalence of frailty in hospitalized elderly patients with AF is high, and the use of OAC is low in these patients. Frail elderly are significantly less likely to receive OAC.

Influence of stroke and bleeding risk on prescribing of oral anticoagulants in older inpatients; has the availability of direct oral anticoagulants changed prescribing?

Background

Little is known about changes in prescribing practices in Australia since the introduction of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Our objective was to examine if the availability of DOACs has coincided with a change in prescribing of oral anticoagulants in older hospital inpatients with regard to risk factors for stroke and bleeding.

Methods

A prospective observational study was conducted between October 2012 and August 2015 of inpatients aged over 60 years initiated on an oral anticoagulant in a large metropolitan, tertiary referral, public teaching hospital in Australia. Treatment groups were patients who commenced an oral anticoagulant prior to inclusion of DOACs on the formulary and those who commenced after the introduction of DOACs. Subgroup analyses were conducted in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Differences in clinical characteristics and risk for stroke and bleeding were calculated using the CHADS₂ and HAS-BLED scores, respectively, were examined.

Results

A total of 289 patients were included. Inpatients prescribed an oral anticoagulant after the introduction of DOACs were significantly older, a greater proportion were female and more likely to have had a prior stroke. This was associated with a statistically higher CHADS₂ score in the post-DOAC group. Similar findings were observed when limiting the sample to patients with AF. Patients with AF who were at greatest likelihood of having a bleeding event were less likely to be treated with a DOAC.

Conclusion

Since the introduction of the DOACs, patients who may have previously received no therapy or suboptimal treatment were now more likely to be receiving anticoagulation, suggesting an appropriate change in prescribing practice.

The impact of frailty on coagulation and responses to warfarin in acute older hospitalised patients with atrial fibrillation: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

The evidence on coagulation changes with frailty is not consistent and clinical studies suggest that frail older people may be at an increased risk of bleeding complications with anticoagulant therapy.

AIMS

This study aims to assess the impact of frailty on coagulation function and on response to warfarin.

METHODS

Inpatients aged over 65 years with atrial fibrillation (AF) were recruited. Frailty was determined using the Reported Edmonton Frail Scale. The Overall Haemostatic Potential (OHP) and Calibrated Automated Thrombogram (CAT) were used to globally assess coagulation function.

RESULTS

Data of 95 participants were analysed, mean age 85.5 ± 6.2, 40% female, and 50.5% frail. Among participants not on anticoagulants (N = 36), there was an increased fibrin generation and decreased thrombin generation compared to the local established normal ranges in young healthy volunteers; the frail had significantly reduced fibrin generation compared to the non-frail. In the warfarin-treated group (N = 59), there was no difference on coagulation profiles between the frail and the non-frail from any of the coagulation tests.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of acute hospitalised patients with AF, the observed decreased fibrin generation in the frail may reflect decreased acute phase response as suggested with the lower plasma fibrinogen in that group. There was no difference in coagulation profiles between the frail and the non-frail amongst those taking warfarin. Compared to young healthy volunteers, older inpatients had increased fibrin generation and decreased thrombin generation. The findings reflect the complex interaction between age, frailty, acute illness, and coagulation.

Older age and a higher EHRA score allow higher levels of frailty syndrome to be predicted in patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

There is no research that evaluates the relationship between the severity of the symptoms of atrial fibrillation (AF), the presence of frailty syndrome and acceptance of the illness.

METHODS

The study included 132 patients aged 72.7 ± 6.73 with diagnosed AF. The severity of the symptoms of AF was determined according to European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) guidelines, frailty syndrome was assessed using the Tilburg frailty indicator (TFI) and the acceptance of the illness was assessed using the acceptance of illness scale (AIS). A standard statistical comparison and multiple regression analysis using the stepwise method were performed.

RESULTS

In patients with AF, frailty was 5.31 ± 2.69 (TFI). Frailty syndrome was diagnosed in 59.8% of the AF patients who had a score of 7.17 ± 1.72. A higher level of EHRA score was connected with a smaller degree of the acceptance of the illness p = 0.0000. The multiple regression model indicated that age (p = 0.0009) and the severity of the symptoms (p = 0.0001) are important predictors of frailty syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a relationship between the presence of frailty syndrome and the intensity of the symptoms and the acceptance of AF. Age and the EHRA score permitted higher levels of frailty syndrome to be predicted.