Results of one-year follow-up of steroid-free immunosuppression in pediatric renal transplant patients

Treatment optimization of maintenance immunosuppressive agents in pediatric renal transplant recipients

Introduction: Graft survival in pediatric kidney transplant patients has increased significantly within the last three decades, correlating with the discovery and utilization of new immunosuppressants as well as improvements in patient care. Despite these developments in graft survival for patients, there is still improvement needed, particularly in long-term care in pediatric patients receiving grafts from deceased donor patients. Maintenance immunosuppressive therapies have narrow therapeutic indices and are associated with high inter-individual and intra-individual variability.Areas covered: In this review, we examine the impact of pharmacokinetic variability on renal transplantation and its association with age, genetic polymorphisms, drug-drug interactions, drug-disease interactions, renal insufficiency, route of administration, and branded versus generic drug formulation. Pharmacodynamics are outlined in terms of the mechanism of action for each immunosuppressant, potential adverse effects, and the utility of pharmacodynamic biomarkers.Expert opinion: Acquiring abetter quantitative understanding of immunosuppressant pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic components should help clinicians implement treatment regimens to maintain the balance between therapeutic efficacy and drug-related toxicity.

Graft survival of pediatric kidney transplant recipients selected for de novo steroid avoidance-a propensity score-matched study

Background

Steroid-avoidance protocols have gained popularity in pediatric kidney transplant recipients at low immunologic risk. The long-term safety of steroid avoidance in children with immunologic risk factors remains unknown.

Methods

Pediatric kidney transplant recipients from 2004 to 2014 in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database who received tacrolimus and mycophenolate immunosuppression were investigated. Propensity score matching was used to compare graft survival in 1624 children who received steroid avoidance with 1624 children who received steroid-based immunosuppression. The effect of steroid avoidance on graft failure among immunologic risk strata was estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression in this propensity score-matched cohort.

Results

It was observed that 5-year graft survival was mildly improved in children receiving steroid avoidance (84.8% versus 81.2%, P = 0.03). This improvement in graft survival occurred in the first 2 years following transplant, when the hazard ratio (HR) for allograft failure in children receiving steroid avoidance was 0.62 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.86]. In contrast, steroid avoidance was not associated with improved allograft survival during Years 2-10 following transplant (HR = 0.93; 95% CI 0.75-1.15). During this time period, HRs (95% CIs) for allograft failure within immunologic risk strata were not significantly different from the null value of 1: repeat kidney transplants, 1.84 (0.84-4.05); African-Americans, 1.02 (0.67-1.56); sensitized recipients, 1.24 (0.63-2.43); recipients of deceased donor kidneys, 1.02 (0.79-1.32); recipients of completely human leukocyte antigen-mismatched kidneys, 0.80 (0.47-1.37); and recipients with pretransplant glomerular disease, 0.94 (0.71-1.23).

Conclusions

In pediatric kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus- and mycophenolate-based immunosuppression, steroid avoidance can be safely practiced in children with immunologic risk factors.

Rapid Discontinuation of Prednisone in Kidney Transplant Recipients: 15-Year Outcomes From the University of Minnesota. Transplantation. 2017;101:2590-2598. [PMID: 28376034 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001756]

BACKGROUND

Short- and intermediate-term results have been reported after rapid discontinuation of prednisone (RDP) in kidney transplant recipients. Yet there has been residual concern about late graft failure in the absence of maintenance prednisone.

METHODS

From October 1, 1999, through June 1, 2015, we performed a total of 1553 adult first and second kidney transplants-1021 with a living donor, 532 with a deceased donor-under our RDP protocol. We analyzed the 15-year actuarial overall patient survival (PS), graft survival (GS), death-censored GS (DCGS), and acute rejection-free survival (ARFS) rates for RDP compared with historical controls on maintenance prednisone.

RESULTS

For living donor recipients, the actuarial 15-year PS rates were similar between groups. But RDP was associated with increased GS (P = 0.02) and DCGS (P = 0.01). For deceased donor recipients, RDP was associated with significantly better PS (P < 0.01), GS (P < 0.01) and DCGS (P < 0.01). There was no difference between groups in the rate of acute or chronic rejection, or in the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate at 15 years. However, RDP-treated recipients had significantly lower rates of avascular necrosis, cytomegalovirus, cataracts, new-onset diabetes after transplant, and cardiac complications. Importantly, for recipients with GS longer than 5 years, there was no difference between groups in subsequent actuarial PS, GS, and DCGS.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, at 15 years postkidney transplant, RDP did not lead to decreased in PS or GS, or an increase in graft dysfunction but as associated with reduced complication rates.

Steroid avoidance or withdrawal for kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Steroid-sparing strategies have been attempted in recent decades to avoid morbidity from long-term steroid intake among kidney transplant recipients. Previous systematic reviews of steroid withdrawal after kidney transplantation have shown a significant increase in acute rejection. There are various protocols to withdraw steroids after kidney transplantation and their possible benefits or harms are subject to systematic review. This is an update of a review first published in 2009.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of steroid withdrawal or avoidance for kidney transplant recipients.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialised Register to 15 February 2016 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which steroids were avoided or withdrawn at any time point after kidney transplantation were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Assessment of risk of bias and data extraction was performed by two authors independently and disagreement resolved by discussion. Statistical analyses were performed using the random-effects model and dichotomous outcomes were reported as relative risk (RR) and continuous outcomes as mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 48 studies (224 reports) that involved 7803 randomised participants. Of these, three studies were conducted in children (346 participants). The 2009 review included 30 studies (94 reports, 5949 participants). Risk of bias was assessed as low for sequence generation in 19 studies and allocation concealment in 14 studies. Incomplete outcome data were adequately addressed in 22 studies and 37 were free of selective reporting.The 48 included studies evaluated three different comparisons: steroid avoidance or withdrawal compared with steroid maintenance, and steroid avoidance compared with steroid withdrawal. For the adult studies there was no significant difference in patient mortality either in studies comparing steroid withdrawal versus steroid maintenance (10 studies, 1913 participants, death at one year post transplantation: RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.30) or in studies comparing steroid avoidance versus steroid maintenance (10 studies, 1462 participants, death at one year after transplantation: RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.80). Similarly no significant difference in graft loss was found comparing steroid withdrawal versus steroid maintenance (8 studies, 1817 participants, graft loss excluding death with functioning graft at one year after transplantation: RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.92) and comparing steroid avoidance versus steroid maintenance (7 studies, 1211 participants, graft loss excluding death with functioning graft at one year after transplantation: RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.86). The risk of acute rejection significantly increased in patients treated with steroids for less than 14 days after transplantation (7 studies, 835 participants: RR 1.58, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.30) and in patients who were withdrawn from steroids at a later time point after transplantation (10 studies, 1913 participants, RR 1.77, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.61). There was no evidence to suggest a difference in harmful events, such as infection and malignancy, in adult kidney transplant recipients. The effect of steroid withdrawal in children is unclear.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This updated review increases the evidence that steroid avoidance and withdrawal after kidney transplantation significantly increase the risk of acute rejection. There was no evidence to suggest a difference in patient mortality or graft loss up to five year after transplantation, but long-term consequences of steroid avoidance and withdrawal remain unclear until today, because prospective long-term studies have not been conducted.

Corticosteroid-free Kidney Transplantation Improves Growth: 2-Year Follow-up of the TWIST Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroid withdrawal (CW) after pediatric kidney transplantation potentially improves growth while avoiding metabolic and other adverse events. We have recently reported the results of a 196 subject randomized controlled trial comparing early CW (tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), daclizumab, and corticosteroids until day 4) with tacrolimus, MMF, and corticosteroid continuation (CC). At 6 months, CW subjects showed better growth with no adverse impact on acute rejection or graft survival (Am J Transplant 2010; 10: 828-836). This 2-year investigator-driven follow-up study aimed to determine whether improved growth persisted in the longer term.

METHODS

Data regarding growth, graft outcomes and adverse events were collected at 1 year (113 patients) and 2 years (106 patients) after transplantation. The primary endpoint, longitudinal growth calculated as delta height standard deviation score, was analyzed using a mixed model repeated measures model.

RESULTS

Corticosteroid withdrawal subjects grew better at 1 year (difference in adjusted mean change, 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.10, 0.40; P = 0.001). At 2 years, growth remained numerically better in CW subjects (0.20 (-0.01, 0.41); P = 0.06), and significantly better in prepubertal subjects (0.50 (0.16, 0.84); P = 0.004). Bacterial and viral infection was significantly more common in CW subjects at 1 year only. Corticosteroid withdrawal and CC subjects received similar exposure to both tacrolimus and MMF at 1 and 2 years. No significant difference in patient or graft survival, rejection, estimated glomerular filtration rate, or other adverse events was detected.

CONCLUSION

Early CW effectively and safely improves growth up to 2 years after transplantation, particularly in prepubertal children.

Clinical Practice of Steroid Avoidance in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation

Steroid-avoidance protocols have recently gained popularity in pediatric kidney transplantation. We investigated the clinical practice of steroid avoidance among 9494 kidney transplant recipients at 124 transplant centers between 2000 and 2012 in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database. The practice of steroid avoidance increased during the study period and demonstrated significant variability among transplant centers. From 2008 to 2012, 39% of transplant centers used steroid avoidance in <10% of all discharged transplant recipients. Twenty-one percent of transplant centers practiced steroid avoidance in 10-40% of transplant recipients, and 40% of transplant centers used steroid avoidance in >40% of discharged patients. Children receiving steroid avoidance more frequently received induction with lymphocyte-depleting agents. Repeat kidney transplants were the least likely to receive steroid avoidance. Children who received a deceased donor kidney, underwent pretransplant dialysis, were highly sensitized, or had glomerular kidney disease or delayed graft function were also less likely to receive steroid avoidance. The variation in practice between centers remained highly significant (p < 0.0001) after adjustment for all patient- and center-level factors in multivariate analysis. We conclude that significant differences in the practice of steroid avoidance among transplant centers remain unexplained and may reflect uncertainty about the safety and efficacy of steroid-avoidance protocols.

Recent developments in kidney transplantation in children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Renal transplantation in childhood is a well established procedure with excellent short-term outcomes. However, waiting times for transplantation are still relatively long if living donation cannot be performed, and long-term outcomes after transplantation have not significantly improved during the last decade.

RECENT FINDINGS

This review describes alternative modalities to improve donation rates such as en bloc kidney transplantation from young donors, ABO-incompatible transplantation and kidney paired donation. This review also deals with long-term post-transplant morbidities, such as follows: first, medication side-effects (metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease) and with the benefits of steroid and calcineurin inhibitor drug minimization; second, the deleterious impact of viral infections and their management and third, chronic antibody-mediated rejection, its therapeutic and prevention possibilities.

SUMMARY

Donor shortage and long-term morbidities, after transplantation, are still relevant issues in paediatric renal transplantation medicine. Significant research and efforts have been made to advance the field and create novel approaches for improvement of transplantation rates and post-transplant graft or patient survival. These modalities are to be established in the routine setting.

Steroid withdrawal in renal transplantation

Over the last decade, steroid minimization became one of the major goals in pediatric renal transplantation. Different protocols have been used by individual centers and multicenter study groups, including early and late steroid withdrawal or even complete avoidance. The timing of steroid withdrawal determines if antibodies are used, as avoidance and early withdrawal require antibody induction, while late withdrawal typically does not. A monoclonal antibody was used in most protocols during an early steroid withdrawal together with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in low immunological risk patients. Polyclonal induction was reported as effective in high-risk patients. Cyclosporine A and mycophenolate mofetil were used in late steroid withdrawal with no induction. All described protocols were effective in terms of preventing acute rejection and preserving renal graft function. There was no superiority of any specific protocol in terms of clinical benefits of steroid withdrawal. Pre-puberty determined growth benefit while other clinical advantages, including better control of glycemia, lipids, and blood pressure, were age independent. It is not clear whether the steroid withdrawal increases the risk of recurrence of primary glomerular diseases post-transplant, however it cannot be excluded. There is no evidence to date for a higher risk of anti-HLA production in steroid-free children after renal transplantation. Key summary points--Current strategies to minimize the steroid-related adverse effects in pediatric renal graft recipients include steroid withdrawal, early or late after transplantation, or complete steroid avoidance--Early steroid withdrawal or avoidance is generally used following the induction therapy with mono- or polyclonal antibodies, while in late steroid withdrawal induction therapy was generally not used- Elimination of steroids (early or late) does not increase the risk of acute rejection and does not deteriorate long-term renal graft function- Early steroid withdrawal is possible in patients at high immunological risk using a combination of polyclonal antibody induction, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil- All protocols of steroid minimization showed relevant clinical benefits, however the growth-related benefit was limited to pre-pubertal patients in all but one of the studies- Adverse events of steroid withdrawal occurred in a higher incidence of post-transplant bone marrow suppression Key research points - There is no clear evidence of the impact of steroid withdrawal on the risk of recurrence of primary glomerulonephritis after renal transplantation in children, therefore further evaluation of this important issue should be performed in prospective trials- There is limited pediatric data on the risk of anti-HLA/donor-specific antibody production in steroid-free patients after renal transplantation. It is not clear whether the selection of the type of induction antibody (lymphocyte depleting versus short, two-dose administration of anti-IL2R inhibitor) is important in this term. The production of anti-HLA antibodies should then be monitored on a regular basis and analyzed in prospective trials.

Paediatric use of mycophenolate mofetil

A number of medications do not have a licence, or label, for use in the paediatric age group nor for the specific indication for which they are being used in children. Over recent years, mycophenolate mofetil has increasingly been used off-label (i.e. off-licence) in adults for a number of indications, including autoimmune conditions; progressively, this wider use has been extended to children. This review summarizes current use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in children, looking at how MMF works, the pharmacokinetics, the clinical conditions for which it is used, the advantages it has when compared with other immunosuppressants and the unresolved issues remaining with use in children. The review aims to focus on off-label use in children so as to identify areas that require further research and investigation. The overall commercial value of MMF is limited because it has now come off patent in adults. Given the increasing knowledge of the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenomics demonstrating the clinical benefits of MMF, new, formal, investigator-led studies, including trials focusing on the use of MMF in children, would be of immense value.

Outcomes of steroid-avoidance protocols in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

Advances in immunosuppression have facilitated increased use of steroid-avoidance protocols in pediatric kidney transplantation. To evaluate such steroid avoidance, a retrospective cohort analysis of pediatric kidney transplant recipients between 2002 and 2009 in the United Network for Organ Sharing database was performed. Outcomes (acute rejection and graft loss) in steroid-based and steroid-avoidance protocols were assessed in 4627 children who received tacrolimus and mycophenolate immunosuppression and did not have multiorgan transplants. Compared to steroid-based protocols, steroid avoidance was associated with decreased risk of acute rejection at 6 months posttransplant (8.3% vs. 10.9%, p = 0.02) and improved 5-year graft survival (84% vs. 78%, p < 0.001). However, patients not receiving steroids experienced less delayed graft function (p = 0.01) and pretransplant dialysis, were less likely to be African-American and more frequently received a first transplant from a living donor (all p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, steroid avoidance trended toward decreased acute rejection at 6 months, but this no longer reached statistical significance, and there was no association of steroid avoidance with graft loss. We conclude that, in clinical practice, steroid avoidance appears safe with regard to graft rejection and loss in pediatric kidney transplant recipients at lower immunologic risk.

Complete steroid avoidance is effective and safe in children with renal transplants: a multicenter randomized trial with three-year follow-up

To determine whether steroid avoidance in pediatric kidney transplantation is safe and efficacious, a randomized, multicenter trial was performed in 12 pediatric kidney transplant centers. One hundred thirty children receiving primary kidney transplants were randomized to steroid-free (SF) or steroid-based (SB) immunosuppression, with concomitant tacrolimus, mycophenolate and standard dose daclizumab (SB group) or extended dose daclizumab (SF group). Follow-up was 3 years posttransplant. Standardized height Z-score change after 3 years follow-up was -0.99 ± 2.20 in SF versus -0.93 ± 1.11 in SB; p = 0.825. In subgroup analysis, recipients under 5 years of age showed improved linear growth with SF compared to SB treatment (change in standardized height Z-score at 3 years -0.43 ± 1.15 vs. -1.07 ± 1.14; p = 0.019). There were no differences in the rates of biopsy-proven acute rejection at 3 years after transplantation (16.7% in SF vs. 17.1% in SB; p = 0.94). Patient survival was 100% in both arms; graft survival was 95% in the SF and 90% in the SB arms (p = 0.30) at 3 years follow-up. Over the 3 year follow-up period, the SF group showed lower systolic BP (p = 0.017) and lower cholesterol levels (p = 0.034). In conclusion, complete steroid avoidance is safe and effective in unsensitized children receiving primary kidney transplants.

Steroid avoidance in renal transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2011;16:477-482. [PMID: 21844809 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0b013e32834a8c74]

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The recent surge in the use of steroid-avoidance protocols for pediatric renal transplant recipients has been fueled by the numerous adverse side effects of steroids and development of alternatives for successful immunosuppression. Steroid-avoidance protocols were first attempted in the adult population, and with positive outcomes, pediatrics soon followed. As more pediatric patients are placed on steroid-avoidance protocols, we must begin answering several important questions such as patient and graft outcome, safety profiles of various steroid-avoidance induction protocols, viral complications and incidence of transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), metabolic benefits, and the affect of steroid minimization on growth.

RECENT FINDINGS

Initial results from steroid-avoidance protocols show these protocols are safe and effective with improved graft survival, metabolic profiles, and linear growth without an increase in viremia or PTLD.

SUMMARY

Although initial results are promising, there is still a lack of long-term data from large, prospective randomized trials, and there is not enough data to determine the optimal steroid-avoidance protocol for pediatric renal transplant recipients.

Minimizing steroid use in pediatric kidney recipients

Outcomes of pediatric kidney transplantation have improved significantly over the years, such that the majority of graft recipients survive to become adolescents and adults. In this article, the findings of some of the important trials that shaped the current therapeutic landscape of immunosuppression will be reviewed. As an evolving landscape, novel strategies are continuously being sought to address the significant challenges in pediatric transplantation. Among these challenges is the development of immunosuppressive strategies that not only minimize the risk of allograft rejection but also allow normal growth and developmental patterns in children. To that end, the growing clinical evidence that indicates that the use of steroid-sparing regimens is effective will be reviewed. Finally, a brief description of the TWIST study will be provided. This large-scale comparative study has been designed specifically to assess the effect of early steroid withdrawal on growth in pediatric renal transplant recipients. An overview of the preliminary analysis of the eagerly anticipated results of this landmark trial will also be provided.

Steroid minimization in pediatric renal transplantation: Early withdrawal or avoidance?

  Clinically important adverse events associated with the use of corticosteroids post-transplantation include hypertension, dyslipidemia, impaired glucose metabolism (including diabetes mellitus), growth retardation, bone fractures, and cosmetic problems. Over recent years, a number of studies have investigated the effect of minimizing exposure to corticosteroids in post-transplant immunosuppression protocols in both adults and children. In pediatric patients, several different approaches have been evaluated, including late steroid withdrawal, early steroid withdrawal, and complete steroid avoidance with or without poly- or monoclonal antibody induction and a variety of maintenance immunosuppressants. This manuscript reviews the key studies and documents the specific clinical benefits associated with steroid minimization. The development of PTLD and bone marrow suppression has been a major safety concern in some of these studies. These studies and other adverse effects are discussed.

Effects of steroid avoidance and novel protocols on growth in paediatric renal transplant patients

The vast majority of kidney transplant recipients undergo triple maintenance immunosuppression that includes the use of steroids. Irrespective of their long history in organ transplantation and proven efficacy in preventing acute graft rejection, steroids exhibit an unfavourable toxicity profile, including growth retardation in children. Given these negative effects, therapeutic approaches that will substantially decrease patients' exposure to steroids have been considered. The planned approaches included alternate day administration, rapid or late steroid withdrawal at the pre-scheduled time after transplantation and complete steroid avoidance. All three of these strategies have been tested in single- or multicentre studies and shown to have distinct clinical advantages in terms of decreasing the incidence and severity of specific adverse events. However, the safety of these protocols could not be universally proven. The Stanford study showed that a complete steroid avoidance under the "cover" of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and extended daclizumab induction is a very effective regimen for obtaining an improvement in post-transplantation growth. The recently reported international randomized TWIST trial demonstrated growth improvement as early as 6 months post-transplantation. These protocols may potentially enable paediatric renal graft recipients to safely avoid steroid exposure.

A randomized trial to assess the impact of early steroid withdrawal on growth in pediatric renal transplantation: the TWIST study

Minimizing steroid exposure in pediatric renal transplant recipients can improve linear growth and reduce metabolic disorders. This randomized multicenter study investigated the impact of early steroid withdrawal on mean change in height standard deviation score (SDS) and the safety and efficacy of two immunosuppressive regimens during the first 6 months after transplantation. Children received tacrolimus, MMF, two doses of daclizumab and steroids until day 4 (TAC/MMF/DAC, n=98) or tacrolimus, MMF and standard-dose steroids (TAC/MMF/STR, n=98). Mean change in height SDS was 0.16 +/- 0.32 with TAC/MMF/DAC and 0.03 +/- 0.32 with TAC/MMF/STR. The mean treatment group difference was 0.13 (p < 0.005 [95% CI 0.04-0.22]), 0.21 in prepubertal (p = 0.009 [95% CI 0.05-0.36]) and 0.05 in pubertal children (p = ns). Frequency of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 10.2%, TAC/MMF/DAC, and 7.1%, TAC/MMF/STR. Patient and graft survival and renal function were similar. Significantly greater reductions in total cholesterol and triglycerides but significantly higher incidences of infection and anemia were found with TAC/MMF/DAC (p < 0.05 all comparisons). Early steroid withdrawal significantly aided growth at 6 months more so in prepubertal than pubertal children. This was accompanied by significantly better lipid and glucose metabolism profiles without increases in graft rejection or loss.

Steroid avoidance using sirolimus and cyclosporine in pediatric renal transplantation: one year analysis

Steroids are commonly used in pediatric renal transplantation, but have numerous adverse effects. This retrospective study compares one-yr outcomes in 22 pediatric renal transplant recipients receiving SRL and CSA as primary immunosuppression (steroid-avoidance group) to age- and gender-matched historical controls receiving CSA, MMF, and prednisone (steroid group). At one yr, both groups had similar graft survival, acute rejection, and estimated GFR. Subjects in the steroid-avoidance group had better linear growth, less excessive weight gain and were less likely to have an increase in antihypertensive medication use. Subjects in the steroid-avoidance group were more likely to be started on lipid lowering medications and erythropoiesis stimulating agents. Despite having a greater proportion of living donors, the steroid-avoidance group had a similar GFR compared to the steroid group at one month. The steroid-avoidance group was also more likely to have a biopsy for elevated Cr that was not because of rejection and had more interstitial fibrosis noted. We conclude that using a steroid-avoidance immunosuppression regimen of SRL and CSA results in comparable rejection rates and short-term graft function with less steroid-associated morbidity. However, early findings also suggest possible potentiation of CSA nephrotoxicity by SRL in some children.

Pediatric kidney transplantation using a novel protocol of rapid (6-day) discontinuation of prednisone: 2-year results

BACKGROUND

There are few prospective studies of prednisone-free immunosuppression (IS) in pediatric kidney transplant (KTx) recipients. We studied the outcomes of a protocol using rapid discontinuation of prednisone (RDP, <1 week) and thymoglobulin induction.

METHODS

Twenty-one RDP recipients (mean age 14+/-3 years) received KTx between May 2002 and December 2005 and were matched with controls (n=39) for age, race, and donor source. For the RDP group, IS consisted of prednisone tapered off over 6 days, thymoglobulin, mycophenolate mofetil, and cyclosporine A (CsA). In controls, IS consisted of thymoglobulin, maintenance prednisone, azathioprine, and CsA.

RESULTS

For the RDP group, graft survival at 1 and 2 years was 90% and 86%; for the controls, graft survival at 1 and 2 years was 92%, and 90% (P=0.86). For the RDP group, the incidence of acute rejection at 1 and 2 years was 14% and 19%; for controls, the incidence of acute rejection at 1 and 2 years was 23%, and 31% (P=0.17). Of the 18 RDP recipients with functioning grafts, 89% remain prednisone-free at follow-up. There was no significant difference between groups in recipient survival rates, incidence of hypertension, chronic allograft nephropathy, or cytomegalovirus disease.

CONCLUSIONS

RDP using thymoglobulin, mycophenolate mofetil, and CsA in selected pediatric KTx recipients is associated with recipient and graft survival rates and acute rejection incidence comparable with quadruple drug therapy.

Rapid discontinuation of corticosteroids in pediatric renal transplantation

Corticosteroid immunosuppression has permitted the development of successful allotransplantation; however, corticosteroids are associated significant post-transplant complications. To circumvent these problems, we implemented a protocol of rapid discontinuation of corticosteroids in 19 consecutive pediatric primary kidney transplant recipients. Mean age at time of transplant was 13.4 (+/-4.5) yr, 52.6% were male, 63.2% underwent living donor transplantation. All patients were administered Thymoglobulin [anti-thymocyte globulin (rabbit)] as induction immunosuppression with a rapid tapering dose of corticosteroids (total of five daily doses), and maintained on mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus. Two patients had immediate recurrence of primary disease (FSGS), requiring further corticosteroid therapy. Otherwise, remaining 17 patients were maintained off corticosteroids, with excellent graft function; mean baseline eGFR of 112 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (+/-19) at 28 months (+/-14) post-transplantation. There was 100% patient and rejection-free graft survival at 27 months (range 5-58 months) post-transplantation; 47% underwent renal transplant biopsy secondary to acute rise in serum creatinine with or without worsening hypertension. All biopsies had no evidence of acute rejection; 62.5% had findings consistent with tacrolimus toxicity. Renal transplantation utilizing a rapid discontinuation of corticosteroid protocol in pediatric patients appears to be safe and effective, without increasing the risk of acute rejection or graft loss.

Renal transplantation with early steroid withdrawal

Steroids are effective immunosuppressants in renal transplantation but are associated with significant adverse effects. As a result, there has been increased interest in protocols utilizing steroid minimization. Initial trials stopped steroids at approximately 3 months, when the highest risk phase for acute rejection was over. As two randomized trials using cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil without induction therapy showed an unacceptably high acute rejection rate, more recent interest has focused on the cessation of steroids very early, usually within the first week after transplantation. Most protocols have used antibody induction combined with calcineurin inhibitors and mycophenolic acid derivatives. Uncontrolled studies have shown a low rate of acute rejection, but the most recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated an increased risk of acute rejection. These trials have not shown any consistent difference in short-term patient or graft survival. Cardiovascular risk factors do not appear to be consistently improved by early steroid withdrawal. Most trials lack sufficient follow-up (5 years or more) to assess the impact of the increased acute rejection rate seen with early steroid withdrawal on long-term outcomes. Thus, the use of such protocols remains investigational.

Steroid avoidance or withdrawal for kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Steroid-sparing strategies have been attempted during the last two decades in order to avoid morbidity in kidney transplant recipients. Previous systematic reviews of steroid withdrawal after kidney transplantation have shown significant increases in acute rejection and an increase in graft failure rates. Steroid avoidance in kidney transplantation is increasingly attempted and the possible benefits or harms have never been a subject of a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety and efficacy of steroid withdrawal or avoidance in patients receiving a kidney transplant.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE, references lists and abstracts from international transplantation society scientific meetings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled studies (RCTs) of steroid avoidance or withdrawal were included providing that one treatment arm consisted in steroid avoidance or withdrawal and intention-to-treat rates of acute rejection and graft failure were clearly established after steroid avoidance or use or withdrawal or continuation. Observational studies were tabulated.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and results expressed as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 30 RCTs (5949 participants). Steroid-sparing strategies showed no effect on mortality or graft loss including death. Patients on any steroid-sparing strategy showed a higher risk of graft loss excluding death than those with conventional steroid use (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.52), especially in those not receiving MMF/Myf or everolimus (RR 1.70, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.90). Acute rejection was more frequent with a steroid-sparing strategy (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.40) and more frequent after steroid withdrawal or avoidance when compared with standard steroid treatment when cyclosporin (CsA) was used. Steroid-sparing and withdrawal strategies showed benefits in reducing antihypertensive drug need, serum cholesterol, antihyperlipidaemic drug need, new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) requiring any treatment and cataracts. Steroid avoidance did not alter serum cholesterol, but was associated with less frequent NODAT requiring any treatment. Cardiovascular events were reduced with steroid avoidance. Reduced antihypertensive drug need and serum cholesterol were similar with CsA or tacrolimus (TAC). Reduced antihyperlipidaemic drug need was only evident with TAC, whereas the reduction in NODAT requiring any treatment was only evident with CsA. Infection was lower in steroid-sparing patients using CsA (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.00). NODAT requiring any treatment was less frequent with steroid avoidance than with steroid withdrawal.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review confirms that steroid avoidance and steroid withdrawal strategies in kidney transplantation are not associated with increased mortality or graft loss despite an increase in acute rejection. These immunosuppression strategies may allow safe steroid avoidance or elimination a few days after kidney transplantation if antibody induction treatment is prescribed or after three to six months if such induction is not used.

Can pediatric steroid-free renal transplantation improve growth and metabolic complications?

We analyzed the effects of a steroid avoidance protocol in pediatric renal transplant recipients on calculated CrCl (Schwartz), CMV infection, cholesterol, height Z scores, weight Z scores, and BMI Z scores in a case control trial with contemporaneous controls. From 1999 to 2004, 19 pediatric patients (age 1-20 yr) received transplants without steroids using immunosuppression with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and daclizumab. Control patients (n = 30) were matched for length of follow-up (minimum one yr), donor type age, type of immunosuppression, sex, date of transplant, and original disease, and CMV status. Graft survival at one year was 100% in both groups. Mean CrCl of steroid-free vs. control patients were not different at 1 year post-transplant. CMV disease was more prevalent in steroid-treated control group (seven of 30 patients) vs. the steroid free control group (zero of 19). Height delta Z scores at one year were NOT different between groups. Weight and BMI delta Z scores were significantly higher in the control group. Cholesterol levels at one year post-transplant were different in the two groups but NOT ABNORMALLY elevated in either group. At one yr post-transplant, steroid-free immunosuppression with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and daclizumab provides outcomes that are equivalent or superior to those in contemporaneous control patients receiving steroids.

Calcineurin inhibitor sparing in paediatric solid organ transplantation : managing the efficacy/toxicity conundrum

Despite their efficacy, the calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) ciclosporin and tacrolimus carry a risk of debilitating adverse effects, especially nephrotoxicity, that affect the long-term outcome and survival of children who are given organ transplants. Simple reduction in dosage of CNI has little or no long-term benefit on their adverse effects, and complete withdrawal without threatening graft outcome may only be possible after liver transplantation. Until the last decade, the only option was to increase corticosteroid and/or azathioprine doses, which imposed additional long-term hazards. Considered here are the emerging generation of new agents offering an opportunity for improving long-term graft survival, minimizing CNI-related adverse events and ensuring patient well-being.A holistic, multifaceted strategy may need to be considered - initial selection and optimized use and monitoring of immunosuppressant regimens, early recognition of indicators of patient and graft dysfunction, and, where applicable, early introduction of CNI-sparing regimens facilitating CNI withdrawal. The evidence reviewed here supports these approaches but remains far from definitive in paediatric solid organ transplantation. Because de novo immunosuppression uses CNI in more than 93% of patients, reduction of CNI-related adverse effects has focused on CNI sparing or withdrawal.A recurring theme where sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil have been used for this purpose is the importance of their early introduction to limit CNI damage and provide long-term benefit: for example, long-term renal function critically reflects that at 1 year post-transplant. While mycophenolic acid shows advantages over sirolimus in preserving renal function because the latter is associated with proteinuria, sirolimus appears the more potent immunosuppressant but also impairs early wound healing. The use of CNI-free immunosuppressant regimens with depleting or non-depleting antibodies plus sirolimus and mycophenolic acid needs much wider investigation to achieve acceptable rejection rates and conserve renal function. The adverse effects of the alternative immunosuppressants, particularly the dyslipidaemia associated with sirolimus, needs to be minimized to avoid replacing one set of adverse effects (from CNIs) with another. While we can only conjecture that judicious combinations with the second generation of novel immunosuppressants currently in development will provide these solutions, a rationale of low-dose therapy with multiple immunosuppressants acting by complementary mechanisms seems to hold the promise for efficacy with minimal toxicity until the vision of tolerance achieves reality.

Potential influence of tacrolimus and steroid avoidance on early graft function in pediatric renal transplantation

With the increasing adoption of steroid-sparing immunosuppression protocols in renal transplantation, it is important to evaluate any adverse effects of steroid avoidance on graft function. Early graft function, measured by CrCl was retrospectively studied in 158 consecutive pediatric renal transplant recipients from 1996 to 2005, receiving either steroid-free or steroid-based immunosuppression. Patients receiving steroid-free immunosuppression vs. steroid-based immunosuppression had no difference change in CrCl (DeltaCrCl) in the first week post-transplantation (p = 0.12). When stratified by corticosteroid usage, patients with higher tacrolimus trough levels (> or =14 ng/mL) had slower graft function recovery in the first week post-transplantation than those with lower tacrolimus trough levels (p = 0.008) in the steroid-free group only. Despite initial slower graft function recovery in this subgroup, there was no negative impact on graft function in the steroid-free group; in fact steroid-free patients trended towards better CrCl at six months (p = 0.047) and 12 months (p < 0.001) post-transplant than the steroid-based group. With the improved immunological outcomes with steroid avoidance, close surveillance should be performed of tacrolimus levels to avoid levels >14 ng/mL. In patients with slow recovery of early graft function, short-term perioperative steroids may be considered.

Tracking of blood pressure and its impact on graft function in pediatric renal transplant patients

We studied tracking of BP and its impact on GFR in 44 PRTP followed for 56 months. Three months PT 77% had elevated SBP percentile. First year SBP and DBP correlated positively with final values (p < 0.0001, 0.0002, respectively). Pretransplant and three month PT SBP correlated positively (p = 0.02). At one yr, SBP and DBP were inversely associated with GFR (p = 0.002, p < 0.0001, respectively). SBP and BMI were positively associated at all time points. DBP was significantly higher in deceased recipients throughout the study period. Final DBP was higher (p = 0.03) and GFR lower (p = 0.04) in African-American patients. Patients with end-stage renal disease caused by glomerular disease had higher SBP (p = 0.03) and DBP (p = 0.04) than those with congenital malformations. GFR at one-yr PT (p = 0.02) and end of study (p = 0.003) was significantly lower in patients with high BP. Moreover, patients who maintained a normal systolic BP throughout the study had a significantly higher final GFR than those who were hypertensive at both time points [84 (normal BP throughout) vs. 52 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (high BP throughout), p = 0.02]. We conclude that PT hypertension is common in PRTP and predicts lower GFR.

Selective late steroid withdrawal after renal transplantation

Steroid withdrawal (SW) after paediatric renal transplantation (RTPL) is controversial. Selective late SW has been performed in our unit since 1995. The safety and effects of SW were analysed retrospectively in 47 patients undergoing RTPL between 1995 and 2004. Initial immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporine A, azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil and steroids. Criteria for SW were: (1) stable renal function, (2) time interval after RTPL > or = 1 year, (3) no rejection or time interval after last rejection > or = 1 year and (4) good compliance. SW was performed in 30 patients at an age of 13.5 years (range 4.5-18.5) and 2.2 years (range 1-6.6) after RTPL. After SW, one patient experienced a steroid-sensitive rejection. Follow-up after SW (1.3 year; range 0.25-7.5) showed maintained renal function: glomerular filtration rate at SW and currently was 82 (65-128) and 82 (42-115) ml/min per 1.73 m(2), respectively. The number of patients on antihypertensive treatment did not significantly change (at SW: n = 15; currently: n = 11). Height and body mass index (BMI) remained stable: Median standard deviation score (SDS) for height/BMI at SW and currently was -1.1/0.2 and -0.8/0.1, respectively. Selective late SW was safe regarding renal function and had no significant effect on blood pressure and growth.

Assessment of risk factors for cardiovasuclar disease in pediatric renal transplant patients

Pediatric renal TP recipients are at risk for CVD. We performed a cross-sectional study of the prevalence of RF for CVD in 45 long-term pediatric renal TP patients. The time since TP was 42 months. The GFR was 87.8 +/- 3.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2); 25/45 (56%) had Stage 2-4 CKD. A total of 33% had elevated SBP and 24% had high DBP; 57% had elevated SBP or DBP. A total of 20% had elevated serum CHOL levels, while 45% had high serum TG levels. A total of 42% had high HCY levels and 50% had low HCT levels. The vast majority (66.7%) had at least two RF for CVD. A total of 18.2% had abnormal post-TP echocardiography results. There was a negative correlation between GFR and SBP, DBP, serum CHOL, HCY, and BMI. There was a positive correlation between GFR and HCT. Serum CHOL was significantly lower and SBP and DBP trended lower in patients on a SF immunosuppression regimen. Similarly, SBP and DBP trended higher and CHOL was significantly higher in patients receiving SRL vs. mycophenolate mofetil. We conclude that the majority of pediatric renal TP patients exhibit multiple CVD RF.

Avoiding steroids in pediatric renal transplantation: long-term experience from a single centre

We report our experience in pediatric renal transplantation avoiding steroids whenever possible. Immunosuppression consisted of an initial induction with antithymocyte globulin followed by maintenance therapy with a calcineurin inhibitor and MMF. Steroids were only given to selected patients because of the primary disease, recurrence, rejection, or PTLD. Thirty-four transplants grafted into 32 recipients between 1995 and 2005 were followed for a median of 3.5 yr (range 1-9.8). All patients survived. Graft rejection occurred in 10 cases during the first year post-transplantation and graft survival at one, five, and seven yr was 97, 88 and 88%, respectively. Steroids were given to half of the patients (n = 16); in nine cases due to rejection. Only four patients (13%) were continuously on steroids. Calculated GFR at one to five yr post-transplant were 73, 74, 68, 64, and 70 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Unfortunately PTLD occurred in three patients, but all survived with functioning grafts. Accordingly, our findings indicate that steroid avoidance in pediatric renal transplantation is possible with good results with respect to acute graft rejection as well as long-term graft survival.

Immunosuppression minimization in pediatric transplantation

The greatest benefit of immunosuppression minimization for children may lie in improving patient morbidity, by the elimination of the inherent side effects of steroid and calcineurin inhibitors (CNI). The newer generation of powerful induction and maintenance immunosuppressants offers an option for selected immunosuppression minimization strategies, some of which have been shown to also reduce graft morbidity. Steroid minimization and avoidance in single-center uncontrolled trials have shown early promise and the availability of data from an ongoing randomized, prospective, controlled trial of steroid avoidance in children will provide necessary data to support a practice change for steroid elimination in children. Calcineurin inhibitor minimization and addition of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or sirolimus have shown variable improvements in renal function, though suboptimal efficacy and safety with the currently proposed regimes have limited their application. Randomized, prospective studies of steroid and calcineurin inhibitor minimization and/or avoidance are warranted to clearly confirm the short and long-term safety and efficacy of alternative immunosuppression combinations. Linked pharmacokinetic and mechanistic studies within these trials will allow for optimizing drug dosing and monitoring. This article reviews published experience to date with steroid and calcineurin minimization in pediatric renal transplantation and discusses the risks and benefits of these approaches.

How have the past 5 years of research changed clinical practice in paediatric nephrology?

Clinical practice in paediatric nephrology is continuously evolving to mirror the research output of the 21st century. The management of antenatally diagnosed renal anomalies, urinary tract infections, nephrotic syndrome and hypertension is becoming more evidence based. Obesity and related hypertension is being targeted at primary and secondary care. The evolving field of molecular and cytogenetics is discovering genes that are facilitating clinicians and families with prenatal diagnoses and understanding of disease processes. The progression of chronic kidney disease in childhood to end-stage renal failure (ESRF) can be delayed using medical treatment to reduce proteinuria and treat hypertension. Pre-emptive living-related renal transplantation has become the treatment of choice for children with ESRF, thereby reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with peritoneal and haemodialysis. Although peritoneal dialysis, which is performed in the patient's home, is the preferred modality for children for whom there is no living or deceased donor for transplantation, home nocturnal haemodialysis is becoming a feasible option. Imaging modalities with the use of magnetic resonance and computerised tomography are continuously improving. As mortality for renal and vasculitic diseases improves, the gauntlet is now thrown down to reduce morbidity with secondary prevention of longer-term complications such as atherosclerosis and hyperlipidaemia. Clinical and drug trials in the fields of hypertension, nephrotic syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, vasculitis and transplantation are producing more effective treatments, thereby reducing the morbidity resulting from the disease processes and the side effects of drugs.