1
|
Currier EE, Ichkanian Y, Dabaja M, Segovia MC, Patel Y, Nagai S, Sudan DL, Jafri SM. Cytomegalovirus Infection Management in Multivisceral and Intestinal Transplant: A Dual Institution Study. Transplant Proc 2023; 55:413-416. [PMID: 36792485 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
Intestinal transplant and multivisceral transplant were originally in pediatric populations and are relatively new procedures in adults. Despite increasing success rates in the immediate post-transplant period, infectious complications and acute and chronic rejection remain significant causes of morbidity and mortality. Previous research has shown cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the main cause of infection in this population. Due to the limited patient population, incidence of CMV viremia ranges widely and there is lack of universal protocol for treatment. This dual institution retrospective chart review between Henry Ford Hospital and Duke University analyzed adult intestinal and multivisceral transplant recipients between 2009 and 2019. Of the 32 patients identified and included in the study, 15 had CMV infection (46.9%). Of those with CMV infection, 5 (33.3%) had donor positive (D+)/recipient positive (R+) status; 5 had D-/R+; 4 had D+/R-; and one had D-/R-. There was no significant difference between mortality in those who had reported infection and not (80% vs 76.5%). The data from this study show significant rates of CMV viremia in patients undergoing intestinal transplant/multivisceral transplant with almost half of our study population having documented infection within 1 year of transplant, stressing the importance for universal protocol into CMV viremia treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily E Currier
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.
| | - Yervant Ichkanian
- Henry Ford Hospital Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Mohamad Dabaja
- Henry Ford Hospital Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Detroit, Michigan
| | | | - Yuval Patel
- Duke University Department of Gastroenterology, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Shunji Nagai
- Henry Ford Hospital Department of Transplant Surgery, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Debra L Sudan
- Duke University, Department of Transplant Surgery, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Syed-Mohammed Jafri
- Henry Ford Hospital Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Detroit, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Joharji H, Alaidaros F, Koujan H, Hamad A, Almaghrabi RS, Zidan A, Broering D, Al-Jedai A. A Case Report of Successful Use of Twice-Daily Letermovir in the Treatment of Resistant Cytomegalovirus in a Small Bowel Transplant Recipient. Transplant Proc 2022; 54:1679-1681. [PMID: 35842318 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.04.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is considered one of the most notable pathogens that affect patients after solid organ transplantation (SOT), especially small bowel transplant patients with a risk of high mortality rate. Its management relies historically on the use of CMV DNA polymerase inhibitors (namely, ganciclovir and valganciclovir). Second-line options include foscarnet and cidofovir, which are highly nephrotoxic and thus less preferred and only used in ganciclovir intolerance or resistance cases. Letermovir is a novel antiviral agent approved for CMV prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplant, but not for SOT (neither for prophylaxis nor for treatment). We report the first case on the successful use of letermovir in treating CMV disease in a small bowel transplant patient who failed to achieve viral clearance due to ganciclovir resistance and severe intolerance to foscarnet.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hala Joharji
- Organ Transplant Center of Excellence, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fatima Alaidaros
- Organ Transplant Center of Excellence, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hamzah Koujan
- Organ Transplant Center of Excellence, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Alaa Hamad
- Organ Transplant Center of Excellence, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Reem S Almaghrabi
- Organ Transplant Center of Excellence, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed Zidan
- Organ Transplant Center of Excellence, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Deiter Broering
- Organ Transplant Center of Excellence, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed Al-Jedai
- Organ Transplant Center of Excellence, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee EJ, Mazariegos GV, Bond GJ. Pediatric intestinal transplantation. Semin Pediatr Surg 2022; 31:151181. [PMID: 35725057 DOI: 10.1016/j.sempedsurg.2022.151181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Advancements in donor management, organ preservation and operative techniques, as well as immunosuppressive therapies, have provided children with intestinal failure and its complications a chance not only for enteral autonomy but also long-term survival through intestinal transplantation (ITx). First described in the 1960's, experience has grown in managing these complex patients both pre- and post-transplant. The goals of this review are to provide a brief history of intestinal transplantation and intestinal rehabilitation in pediatric patients, followed by focused discussions of the indications for ITx, induction and maintenance immunosuppression therapies, common post-operative complications, and outcomes/quality of life post-transplant.
Collapse
|
4
|
Natori Y, Alghamdi A, Tazari M, Miller V, Husain S, Komatsu T, Griffiths P, Ljungman P, Orchanian-Cheff A, Kumar D, Humar A, Alexander B, Avery R, Baldanti F, Barnett S, Baum P, Berrey MM, Birnkrant D, Blumberg E, Boeckh M, Boutolleau D, Bowlin T, Brooks J, Chemaly R, Chou S, Cloherty G, Cruikshank W, Dropulic L, Einsele H, Erdman J, Fahle G, Fallon L, Gillis H, Gonzalez D, Griffiths P, Gunter K, Hirsch H, Hodowanec A, Humar A, Hunt P, Josephson F, Komatsu T, Kotton C, Krause P, Kuhr F, Lademacher C, Lanier R, Lazarus T, Leake J, Leavitt R, Lehrman SN, Li L, Ljungman P, Lodding PI, Lundgren J, Martinez-Murillo F(P, Mayer H, McCutcheon M, McKinnon J, Mertens T, Miller V, Modarress K, Mols J, Mossman S, Murata Y, Murawski D, Murray J, Natori Y, Nichols G, O’Rear J, Peggs K, Pikis A, Prichard M, Razonable R, Riches M, Roberts J, Saber W, Sayada C, Singer M, Stamminger T, Wijatyk A, Yu D, Zeiher B. Use of Viral Load as a Surrogate Marker in Clinical Studies of Cytomegalovirus in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2019; 66:617-631. [PMID: 29020339 DOI: 10.1093/cid/cix793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2017] [Accepted: 09/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Symptomatic cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease has been the standard endpoint for clinical trials in organ transplant recipients. Viral load may be a more relevant endpoint due to low frequency of disease. We performed a meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature. We found several lines of evidence to support the validity of viral load as an appropriate surrogate end-point, including the following: (1) viral loads in CMV disease are significantly greater than in asymptomatic viremia (odds ratio, 9.3 95% confidence interval, 4.6-19.3); (2) kinetics of viral replication are strongly associated with progression to disease; (3) pooled incidence of CMV viremia and disease is significantly lower during prophylaxis compared with the full patient follow-up period (viremia incidence: 3.2% vs 34.3%; P < .001) (disease incidence: 1.1% vs 13.0%; P < .001); (4) treatment of viremia prevented disease; and (5) viral load decline correlated with symptom resolution. Based on the analysis, we conclude that CMV load is an appropriate surrogate endpoint for CMV trials in organ transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoichiro Natori
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ali Alghamdi
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mahmood Tazari
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Veronica Miller
- Forum for Collaborative Research, University of California, Berkeley
| | - Shahid Husain
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Takashi Komatsu
- Division of Antiviral Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Paul Griffiths
- Institute for Immunity and Transplantation, University College London Medical School, United Kingdom
| | - Per Ljungman
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine Huddigne, Karolinksa Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ani Orchanian-Cheff
- Library and Information Services, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Deepali Kumar
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Atul Humar
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kotton CN, Kumar D, Caliendo AM, Huprikar S, Chou S, Danziger-Isakov L, Humar A; The Transplantation Society International CMV Consensus Group. The Third International Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Cytomegalovirus in Solid-organ Transplantation. Transplantation. 2018;102:900-931. [PMID: 29596116 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 660] [Impact Index Per Article: 132.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Despite recent advances, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections remain one of the most common complications affecting solid organ transplant recipients, conveying higher risks of complications, graft loss, morbidity, and mortality. Research in the field and development of prior consensus guidelines supported by The Transplantation Society has allowed a more standardized approach to CMV management. An international multidisciplinary panel of experts was convened to expand and revise evidence and expert opinion-based consensus guidelines on CMV management including prevention, treatment, diagnostics, immunology, drug resistance, and pediatric issues. Highlights include advances in molecular and immunologic diagnostics, improved understanding of diagnostic thresholds, optimized methods of prevention, advances in the use of novel antiviral therapies and certain immunosuppressive agents, and more savvy approaches to treatment resistant/refractory disease. The following report summarizes the updated recommendations.
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Despite advances in prevention and treatment, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease remain an expected problem in solid organ transplant recipients. Because of the effect of immunosuppressing medications, CMV primary, secondary, and reactivated infection requires antiviral medications to prevent serious direct and indirect effects of the virus. Side effects and drug resistance, however, often limit the capacity of traditional antiviral therapies. This article updates the clinician on current and promising approaches to the management and control of CMV in the solid organ transplant recipient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine E Koval
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Box G21, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chaiyapak T, Borges K, Williams A, Banh T, Vasilevska-ristovska J, Allen U, Parekh RS, Hébert D. Incidence of Cytomegalovirus DNAemia in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients After Cessation of Antiviral Prophylaxis. Transplantation 2018; 102:1391-6. [DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
8
|
Abstract
Pediatric intestinal transplantation has moved from the theoretic to an actual therapy for children with irreversible intestinal failure who are suffering from complications of total parenteral nutrition. Owing to significant advancement in the management of intestinal failure and prevention of parenteral nutrition-related complications that have led to reduction in incidence of parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease and have improved intestinal adaptation, the indications for intestinal transplantation are evolving. Long-term outcomes have improved, but challenges in long-term graft function owing to chronic rejection and immunosuppressant-related complications remain the major opportunities for improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neslihan Celik
- Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Transplantation, Hillman Center for Pediatric Transplantation, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, 4401 Penn Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15224, USA
| | - George V Mazariegos
- Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Transplantation, Hillman Center for Pediatric Transplantation, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, 4401 Penn Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15224, USA
| | - Kyle Soltys
- Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Transplantation, Hillman Center for Pediatric Transplantation, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, 4401 Penn Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15224, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Rudolph
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, 4401 Penn Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15224, USA
| | - Yanjun Shi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Transplantation, Hillman Center for Pediatric Transplantation, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, 4401 Penn Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15224, USA
| | - Geoffrey J Bond
- Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Transplantation, Hillman Center for Pediatric Transplantation, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, 4401 Penn Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15224, USA
| | - Rakesh Sindhi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Transplantation, Hillman Center for Pediatric Transplantation, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, 4401 Penn Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15224, USA
| | - Armando Ganoza
- Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Transplantation, Hillman Center for Pediatric Transplantation, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, 4401 Penn Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15224, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
The field of intestinal transplantation has experienced dramatic growth since the first reported cases 3 decades ago. Improvements in operative technique, donor assessment and immunosuppressive protocols have afforded children who suffer from life-threatening complications of intestinal failure a chance at long-term survival. As experience has grown, newer diseases, with more systemic manifestations have arisen as potential indications for transplant. After discussing the historical developments of intestinal transplant as a backdrop, this review focuses on the specific pre-operative indications for transplant as well as the great success that intestinal rehabilitation has witnessed over the past decade. A detailed discussion of evolution of immunosuppressive strategies is followed a general review of the common infectious complications experienced by children after intestinal transplant as well as the current long- and short-term results, including a section on new research on the quality of life in this challenging population of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle A Soltys
- The Hillman Center for Pediatric Transplantation, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 4401 Penn Ave, 6 FP, Pittsburgh, PA 15224.
| | - Geoff Bond
- The Hillman Center for Pediatric Transplantation, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 4401 Penn Ave, 6 FP, Pittsburgh, PA 15224
| | - Rakesh Sindhi
- The Hillman Center for Pediatric Transplantation, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 4401 Penn Ave, 6 FP, Pittsburgh, PA 15224
| | | | - Armando Ganoza
- The Hillman Center for Pediatric Transplantation, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 4401 Penn Ave, 6 FP, Pittsburgh, PA 15224
| | - Ajai Khanna
- The Hillman Center for Pediatric Transplantation, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 4401 Penn Ave, 6 FP, Pittsburgh, PA 15224
| | - George Mazariegos
- The Hillman Center for Pediatric Transplantation, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 4401 Penn Ave, 6 FP, Pittsburgh, PA 15224
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ambrose T, Sharkey LM, Louis-Auguste J, Rutter CS, Duncan S, English S, Gkrania-Klotsas E, Carmichael A, Woodward JM, Russell N, Massey D, Butler A, Middleton S. Cytomegalovirus Infection and Rates of Antiviral Resistance Following Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplantation. Transplant Proc 2017; 48:492-6. [PMID: 27109985 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.09.070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2015] [Accepted: 09/03/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease is a common and clinically significant complication following intestinal or multivisceral transplantation. CMV disease is more common in cases of serologic mismatch between donor and recipient. Though in some cases it may be asymptomatic, in the immunosuppressed population it often manifests with evidence of systemic infection or end-organ disease. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of all patients undergoing intestinal or multivisceral transplantation over 8 years at our institution. RESULTS Forty-eight transplantations were performed, with 40% of the patients (19/48) having ≥1 episode of CMV viremia, which rose to 90% in the "donor-positive, recipient-negative" (DPRN) serologic mismatch group. The median time to 1st episode following transplantation was 22.3 weeks (range, 1-78) and median duration of each episode was 4.9 weeks (range, 1.6-37.4). Six of the 19 viremic patients (31.6%) developed virologic resistance with 4 of these occurring in the DPRN group. Four of the 6 patients with drug-resistant CMV died with CMV viremia. All patients with drug resistance acquired ganciclovir resistance; these patients were more challenging to manage with second-line toxicity-limited treatments, including foscarnet, cidofovir, and leflunomide. CMV immunoglobulin has been used and we briefly discuss the use of CMV-specific adoptive T-lymphocyte transfer in the management of 1 case. CONCLUSIONS Post-transplantation CMV disease continues to be challenging to manage, and there is little consensus on optimal management strategies in this patient group, with a significant requirement for novel therapies; these may be pharmacologic or cell based. Extensive multidisciplinary discussion is important for most cases, but particularly for those patients who acquire virologic resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Ambrose
- Department of Gastroenterology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - L M Sharkey
- Department of Gastroenterology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - J Louis-Auguste
- Department of Gastroenterology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - C S Rutter
- Department of Gastroenterology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - S Duncan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - S English
- Department of Clinical Virology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - E Gkrania-Klotsas
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - A Carmichael
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - J M Woodward
- Department of Gastroenterology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - N Russell
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - D Massey
- Department of Gastroenterology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - A Butler
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - S Middleton
- Department of Gastroenterology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Posfay-Barbe KM, Michaels MG, Green MD. Intestinal Transplantation. Infect Dis (Lond) 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-7020-6285-8.00083-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
12
|
Nagai S, Mangus RS, Anderson E, Ekser B, Kubal CA, Fridell JA, Tector AJ. Cytomegalovirus Infection After Intestinal/Multivisceral Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience With 210 Cases. Transplantation. 2016;100:451-460. [PMID: 26247555 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000000832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is the most prevalent infectious complication after solid organ transplantation, and recipients of isolated intestinal transplantation (IIT)/multivisceral transplantation (MVT) are among those at the highest risk. Limited clinical data exist regarding CMV infection after IIT/MVT. The aim of this study is to analyze risk factors for posttransplant CMV infection and to assess the efficacy and validity of our prophylaxis and treatment regimens in intestinal transplantation. METHODS Medical records of 210 IIT/MVT patients were retrospectively reviewed. Posttransplant CMV prophylaxis regimen consisted of ganciclovir followed by 1 year of valganciclovir. The addition of CMV immunoglobulin (CMVIG) was decided according to donor/recipient CMV serostatus (D/R). All results of CMV PCR and/or pp65 antigenemia, and pathological reports were reviewed. Time to the incidence of CMV infection (viremia and/or tissue invasive disease) and risk factors for CMV infection were investigated. RESULTS CMV infection was observed in 34 of 210 (16%) with a median onset of 347 days. Rejection was significantly associated with CMV infection (P = 0.01, odds ratio = 2.61). In the high-risk serostatus group (D+/R-), prophylactic CMVIG and induction with high-dose rabbit antithymocyte globulin (>10 mg/kg) were associated with a lower CMV infection rate on univariate analysis. The CMVIG remained to be an independent factor on multivariate analysis (P = 0.04, hazard ratio = 0.93/dose). Mortality associated with CMV infection occurred in 4, and CMV infection adversely affected patient survival (P = 0.001, hazard ratio = 2.71). CONCLUSIONS Prophylaxis with CMVIG and appropriate induction with rabbit antithymocyte globulin may be important to reduce CMV infection in high-risk serostatus group (D+/R-).
Collapse
|
13
|
Timpone J, Yimen M, Cox S, Teran R, Ajluni S, Goldstein D, Fishbein T, Kumar P, Matsumoto C. Resistant cytomegalovirus in intestinal and multivisceral transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis 2016; 18:202-9. [DOI: 10.1111/tid.12507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2015] [Revised: 11/03/2015] [Accepted: 12/05/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- J.G. Timpone
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Travel Medicine; Department of Medicine; MedStar Georgetown University Hospital; Washington DC USA
| | - M. Yimen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery; Lenox Hill Hospital; New York New York USA
| | - S. Cox
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Travel Medicine; Department of Medicine; MedStar Georgetown University Hospital; Washington DC USA
| | - R. Teran
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Travel Medicine; Department of Medicine; MedStar Georgetown University Hospital; Washington DC USA
| | - S. Ajluni
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Travel Medicine; Department of Medicine; MedStar Georgetown University Hospital; Washington DC USA
| | - D. Goldstein
- Infectious Diseases; Whitman-Walker Clinic; Washington DC USA
| | - T. Fishbein
- Department of Surgery; MedStar Georgetown University Hospital; MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute; Washington DC USA
| | - P.N. Kumar
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Travel Medicine; Department of Medicine; MedStar Georgetown University Hospital; Washington DC USA
| | - C. Matsumoto
- Department of Surgery; MedStar Georgetown University Hospital; MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute; Washington DC USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Intestinal transplantation has now emerged as a lifesaving therapeutic option and standard of care for patients with irreversible intestinal failure. Improvement in survival over the years has justified expansion of the indications for intestinal transplantation beyond the original indications approved by Center for Medicare and Medicaid services. Management of patients with intestinal failure is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach to accurately select candidates who would benefit from rehabilitation versus transplantation. Significant strides have been made in patient and graft survival with several advancements in the perioperative management through timely referral, improved patient selection, refinement in the surgical techniques and better understanding of the immunopathology of intestinal transplantation. The therapeutic efficacy of the procedure is well evident from continuous improvements in functional status, quality of life and cost-effectiveness of the procedure. This current review summarizes various aspects including current practices and evidence based recommendations of intestinal transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aparna Rege
- Department of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Debra Sudan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Höcker B, Zencke S, Krupka K, Fichtner A, Pape L, Dello Strologo L, Guzzo I, Topaloglu R, Kranz B, König J, Bald M, Webb NJA, Noyan A, Dursun H, Marks S, Yalcinkaya F, Thiel F, Billing H, Pohl M, Fehrenbach H, Bruckner T, Tönshoff B. Cytomegalovirus Infection in Pediatric Renal Transplantation and the Impact of Chemoprophylaxis With (Val-)Ganciclovir. Transplantation 2016; 100:862-70. [DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000000888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
16
|
Silva JT, San-Juan R, Fernández-Caamaño B, Prieto-Bozano G, Fernández-Ruiz M, Lumbreras C, Calvo-Pulido J, Jiménez-Romero C, Resino-Foz E, López-Medrano F, Lopez-Santamaria M, Maria Aguado J. Infectious Complications Following Small Bowel Transplantation. Am J Transplant 2016; 16:951-9. [PMID: 26560685 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2015] [Revised: 09/08/2015] [Accepted: 09/09/2015] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Microbiological spectrum and outcome of infectious complications following small bowel transplantation (SBT) have not been thoroughly characterized. We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing SBT from 2004 to 2013 in Spain. Sixty-nine patients underwent a total of 87 SBT procedures (65 pediatric, 22 adult). The median follow-up was 867 days. Overall, 81 transplant patients (93.1%) developed 263 episodes of infection (incidence rate: 2.81 episodes per 1000 transplant-days), with no significant differences between adult and pediatric populations. Most infections were bacterial (47.5%). Despite universal prophylaxis, 22 transplant patients (25.3%) developed cytomegalovirus disease, mainly in the form of enteritis. Specifically, 54 episodes of opportunistic infection (OI) occurred in 35 transplant patients. Infection was the major cause of mortality (17 of 24 deaths). Multivariate analysis identified retransplantation (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.21; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-4.80; p = 0.046) and posttransplant renal replacement therapy (RRT; HR: 4.19; 95% CI: 1.40-12.60; p = 0.011) as risk factors for OI. RRT was also a risk factor for invasive fungal disease (IFD; HR: 24.90; 95% CI: 5.35-115.91; p < 0.001). In conclusion, infection is the most frequent complication and the leading cause of death following SBT. Posttransplant RRT and retransplantation identify those recipients at high risk for developing OI and IFD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J T Silva
- Unit of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital "12 de Octubre," Instituto de Investigación Hospital "12 de Octubre," Department of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - R San-Juan
- Unit of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital "12 de Octubre," Instituto de Investigación Hospital "12 de Octubre," Department of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - B Fernández-Caamaño
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, University Hospital "La Paz," Department of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma, Madrid, Spain
| | - G Prieto-Bozano
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, University Hospital "La Paz," Department of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Fernández-Ruiz
- Unit of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital "12 de Octubre," Instituto de Investigación Hospital "12 de Octubre," Department of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - C Lumbreras
- Unit of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital "12 de Octubre," Instituto de Investigación Hospital "12 de Octubre," Department of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Calvo-Pulido
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, University Hospital "12 de Octubre," Madrid, Spain
| | - C Jiménez-Romero
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, University Hospital "12 de Octubre," Madrid, Spain
| | - E Resino-Foz
- Unit of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital "12 de Octubre," Instituto de Investigación Hospital "12 de Octubre," Department of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - F López-Medrano
- Unit of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital "12 de Octubre," Instituto de Investigación Hospital "12 de Octubre," Department of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Lopez-Santamaria
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital "La Paz," Department of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Maria Aguado
- Unit of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital "12 de Octubre," Instituto de Investigación Hospital "12 de Octubre," Department of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Soltys KA, Reyes JD, Green M. Risks and Epidemiology of Infections After Intestinal Transplantation. Transplant Infections 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-28797-3_15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Intestinal transplantation has become a well-accepted and successful procedure to save the lives of patients suffering from intestinal failure and who have developed life-threatening complications of parenteral nutrition. Advances in all aspects of care, from the role of multidisciplinary intestinal rehabilitation services prior to transplant to the development strategies for early recognition of infectious sequelae and even the increasing availability of preventive strategies, have led to improved outcomes and a dramatic decline in infection-associated morbidity and mortality in children undergoing intestinal transplantation. Improvements in surgical techniques and immunosuppressive regimens have been essential components in these improvements, reducing risk of infection through reduction of technical complications and more optimal immunosuppression regimens. In addition, the development of molecular tools for early recognition of viral pathogens and an understanding of the timing and risks for infection have allowed for earlier and more successful treatments. Despite these improvements, infectious sequelae remain an important problem in this population, and additional efforts are needed to further minimize the risk of infectious sequelae in those children requiring this procedure.
Collapse
|
18
|
Middleton S, Pither C, Gao R, Duncan S, Green J, Sharkey L, Chukualim B, Kratzing C, Woodward J, Gabe S, Jamieson N, Butler A. Adult Small Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplantation: Lessons Through the “Retrospecto-scope” at a Single UK Centre From 1991 to 2013. Transplant Proc 2014; 46:2114-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.06.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
19
|
Razonable RR, Hayden RT. Clinical utility of viral load in management of cytomegalovirus infection after solid organ transplantation. Clin Microbiol Rev 2013; 26:703-27. [PMID: 24092851 DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00015-13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 148] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The negative impact of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection on transplant outcomes warrants efforts toward improving its prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. During the last 2 decades, significant breakthroughs in diagnostic virology have facilitated remarkable improvements in CMV disease management. During this period, CMV nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT) evolved to become one of the most commonly performed tests in clinical virology laboratories. NAT provides a means for rapid and sensitive diagnosis of CMV infection in transplant recipients. Viral quantification also introduced several principles of CMV disease management. Specifically, viral load has been utilized (i) for prognostication of CMV disease, (ii) to guide preemptive therapy, (iii) to assess the efficacy of antiviral treatment, (iv) to guide the duration of treatment, and (v) to indicate the risk of clinical relapse or antiviral drug resistance. However, there remain important limitations that require further optimization, including the interassay variability in viral load reporting, which has limited the generation of standardized viral load thresholds for various clinical indications. The recent introduction of an international reference standard should advance the major goal of uniform viral load reporting and interpretation. However, it has also become apparent that other aspects of NAT should be standardized, including sample selection, nucleic acid extraction, amplification, detection, and calibration, among others. This review article synthesizes the vast amount of information on CMV NAT and provides a timely review of the clinical utility of viral load testing in the management of CMV in solid organ transplant recipients. Current limitations are highlighted, and avenues for further research are suggested to optimize the clinical application of NAT in the management of CMV after transplantation.
Collapse
|
20
|
Avsar Y, Cicinnati VR, Kabar I, Wolters H, Anthoni C, Schmidt HH, Beckebaum S. Small bowel transplantation complicated by cytomegalovirus tissue invasive disease without viremia. J Clin Virol. 2014;60:177-180. [PMID: 24703746 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2014.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2013] [Revised: 03/02/2014] [Accepted: 03/06/2014] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
We report on a small bowel transplant patient, donor/recipient seropositive (D+/R+) for cytomegalovirus (CMV), with a clinical course complicated by CMV disease. Anti-CMV prophylaxis was given for 100 days. Immunosuppression consisted of alemtuzumab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone. Five months posttransplant, CMV tissue invasive disease of the upper gastrointestinal tract was evident without the presence of viremia, tested by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Complete viral load suppression was achieved with intravenous ganciclovir, followed by valganciclovir for secondary prophylaxis. Mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone were discontinued. Shortly thereafter the patient presented with recurrent CMV and candida esophagitis. While on ganciclovir and caspofungin, the patient developed CMV tissue invasive disease of the ileal graft, with persistent absence of viremia. Foscarnet and CMV immunoglobulin were added. Viral load declined to undetectable levels; however, clinical improvement did not occur due to occurrence of graft rejection. Despite infliximab and high dose prednisolone, graft rejection was progressive, requiring surgical explantation of the graft. This case highlights the importance of additional diagnostic tools such as endoscopy including PCR analysis of tissue samples. Extension of primary antiviral prophylaxis interval up to 6 months and prolonged retreatment for recurrent CMV disease may be useful to avoid severe CMV-related complications.
Collapse
|
21
|
Florescu DF, Abu-elmagd K, Mercer DF, Qiu F, Kalil AC. An International Survey of Cytomegalovirus Prevention and Treatment Practices in Intestinal Transplantation. Transplantation 2014; 97:78-82. [DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e3182a6baa2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
|
22
|
Florescu DF, Langnas AN, Sandkovsky U. Opportunistic viral infections in intestinal transplantation. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2014; 11:367-81. [DOI: 10.1586/eri.13.25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
23
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Recipients of both solid organ transplant and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are at increased risk for infectious morbidity and mortality after transplantation due to on-going immunosuppression. Gastrointestinal infections have been increasingly reported in these populations. RECENT FINDINGS Increased reports of gastrointestinal infections including bacterial infection with Clostridium difficile, viral infection with norovirus and parasitic pathogens like cryptosporidium are emerging. Risk factors identified have focused on type of transplant, transplant immunosuppression regimens and exposures. Although many events are self-limiting, significant morbidity and rare mortality are reported. SUMMARY Improved diagnostic techniques have increased the reporting of several gastrointestinal infections after transplantation, affording improved understanding of the epidemiology of these diseases. Armed with this emerging data, prevention, recognition of infection and treatment strategies can be more thoroughly assessed in these at-risk populations.
Collapse
|
24
|
Kotton CN, Kumar D, Caliendo AM, Asberg A, Chou S, Danziger-Isakov L, Humar A. Updated international consensus guidelines on the management of cytomegalovirus in solid-organ transplantation. Transplantation 2013; 96:333-60. [PMID: 23896556 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e31829df29d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 549] [Impact Index Per Article: 49.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) continues to be one of the most common infections after solid-organ transplantation, resulting in significant morbidity, graft loss, and adverse outcomes. Management of CMV varies considerably among transplant centers but has been become more standardized by publication of consensus guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Section of The Transplantation Society. An international panel of experts was reconvened in October 2012 to revise and expand evidence and expert opinion-based consensus guidelines on CMV management, including diagnostics, immunology, prevention, treatment, drug resistance, and pediatric issues. The following report summarizes the recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille N Kotton
- Transplant and Immunocompromised Host Infectious Diseases, Infectious Diseases Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Timpone JG, Girlanda R, Rudolph L, Fishbein TM. Infections in Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplant Recipients. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2013; 27:359-77. [DOI: 10.1016/j.idc.2013.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
26
|
Allen U, Green M. The menace of CMV disease after small bowel transplantation: bearer of bad news! Pediatr Transplant 2012; 16:545-8. [PMID: 22574878 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2012.01715.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|