Cardiac function after chemoradiation for esophageal cancer: comparison of heart dose-volume histogram parameters to multiple gated acquisition scan changes

Timing After Neoadjuvant Therapy Predicts Mortality in Patients Undergoing Esophagectomy: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

Currently most surgeons allow 6-12 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy prior to recommending esophagectomy. Given that complete pathologic response correlates to improved survival, some have advocated a longer interval should be entertained to increase the pathologic response. The impact of an expanded neoadjuvant therapy-surgery timing is not currently well understood.

METHODS

Utilizing the National Cancer Database, we identified patients with esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy. Patients were divided into 3-time intervals: < 6 weeks, 6-12 weeks, and > 3 months.

RESULTS

We identified 9256 patients who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy. There were 7858 (84.9%) males and 1398 (15.1%) females with a median age of 62. The median lymph nodes harvested decreased as timing increased (p < 0.001) and mean lymph nodes positive decreased as timing increased, p = 0.01. The complete response rate also increased as timing increased, p < 0.001. However, this improvement in pathologic complete response did not translate into an increase in median survival. Ninety-day mortality increased as the timing from neoadjuvant therapy increased: 6.4%, 7.9%, and 10.2%, respectively, p = 0.002.

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrates that patients who have a prolonged neoadjuvant therapy- esophagectomy interval will have a substantial increase in 90-day mortality. While there was an increase in pathologic complete response rates, this did not translate into an improvement in survival. The current recommendations of a neoadjuvant therapy-surgery timing of 6-12 weeks should remain.

Early detection of radiation-induced myocardial damage by [18F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging

PURPOSE

Retrospective analysis revealed increased [18F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 uptake in the myocardium of patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). This study investigated and verified the feasibility of [18F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT for detecting radiation-induced myocardial damage (RIMD).

METHODS

Myocardial FAPI uptake was analyzed before and during radiotherapy in thirteen ESCC patients treated with CCRT. In the animal study, a single dose of 50 Gy was delivered to the cardiac apex of Wistar rats (24 rats, including 16 RIMD model rats and 8 control model rats). RIMD model rats were scanned with [18F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT weekly for 12 weeks, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Dynamic, blocking, and [18F]FDG PET/CT studies (4 rats/group) were performed on RIMD rats at 5 weeks post-radiation, and histopathological analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Increased FAPI uptake in the myocardium was found after CCRT (1.53 ± 0.53 vs 1.88 ± 0.70, P = 0.015). In RIMD rats, significantly increased FAPI uptake in the damaged myocardium was observed from the 2nd week post-radiation exposure and peaked in the 5th week. Significantly more intense tracer accumulation was observed in the damaged myocardium than in the remote myocardium, as identified by decreased [18F]FDG uptake and confirmed by autoradiography, hematoxylin-eosin, Masson's trichrome, and immunohistochemical staining. The LVEF remained unchanged at the 3rd week post-radiation exposure but was remarkably decreased compared with that in the control group at the 8th week.

CONCLUSION

Through clinical phenomena and animal experimental studies, this study indicated that [18F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging can detect RIMD noninvasively and before a decrease in LVEF, indicating the clinical potential of [18F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 as a PET/CT tracer for early monitoring of RIMD.

Cardiovascular disease related death among patients with esophagus cancer: A population-based competing risk analysis

The proportion of non-cancer death in patients with esophagus cancer (EC) still increasing, especially cardiovascular disease (CVD) related death. The aim of this study was assess non-cancer causes of death and identified independent risk factors of CVD related death in EC patients. Patients diagnosed with EC were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result database (SEER) database for analysis. Standardized mortality rates (SMRs) for non-EC deaths were calculated, the risk of death were assessed and compared with US general population. Multivariate competitive risk analysis were performed to select independent risk factors for death from CVD in EC patients. A total of 43739 EC patients were enrolled and 35139 died during follow-up, of which 4248 died from non-cancer cause of death. The risk of non-cancer death in EC patients was 2.27-fold higher than in the general population (SMR=2.27; 95% CI, 2.20-2.34). CVD were the most important cause of non-cancer death in EC patients, accounting for 43.4% of non-cancer of deaths. Compare with the general population, EC patients have higher risk of death from disease of heart (SMR, 2.24; 95% CI, 2.13-2.35), pneumonia and influenza (SMR, 2.92; 95% CI, 2.50-3.39), septicemia (SMR, 5.01; 95% CI, 4.30-5.79), along with other causes. Patients with advanced age and patients who received radiotherapy has higher risk of death caused by CVD, patients with female sex, poor differentiated and undifferentiated, regional and distant stage, married, diagnosed between 2010-2016 has lower risk of CVD related death, compared with patients without any treatment measures, patients received chemotherapy alone has lower risk of death from CVD. Non-cancer cause of death has become an important cause of death in EC patients. Improving public awareness of the major risk factors for non-cancer death is beneficial to the prevention and treatment of malignant tumors.

Impact of Radiation on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Older Resectable Esophageal Cancer Patients With Medicare

OBJECTIVES

Preoperative radiotherapy improves outcomes for operable esophageal cancer patients, though the proximity of the heart to the esophagus puts patients at risk of radiation-induced cardiovascular disease. This study characterizes the impact of radiotherapy and different radiation techniques on cardiovascular morbidity among a cohort of esophageal cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified 1125 patients aged 65 and older diagnosed between 2000 and 2011 with esophageal cancer who received surgery alone, or surgery preceded by either preoperative chemotherapy or preoperative chemoradiation from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. We used Medicare claims to identify severe perioperative and late cardiovascular events. Multivariable logistic regression and Fine-Gray models were used to determine the effect of presurgery treatment on the risk of perioperative and late cardiovascular disease.

RESULTS

Preoperative chemotherapy or chemoradiation did not significantly increase the risk of perioperative cardiovascular complications compared with surgery alone. Patients treated with preoperative chemoradiation had a 36% increased risk of having a late cardiovascular event compared with patients treated with surgery alone (subdistribution hazard ratio [SDHR]: 1.36; P=0.035). There was no significant increase in late cardiovascular events among patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy (SDHR: 1.18; P=0.40). Among patients treated with preoperative chemoradiation, those receiving intensity modulated radiotherapy had a 68% decreased risk of having a late cardiovascular event compared with patients receiving conventional radiation (SDHR: 0.32; P=0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates an increased risk of cardiovascular complications among operative esophageal cancer patients treated with preoperative chemoradiation, though these risks might be reduced with more cardioprotective radiation techniques such as intensity modulated radiotherapy.

Cardiac Toxicity in Operable Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated With or Without Chemoradiation

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate predictors of cardiac events in esophageal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NA CRT) followed by surgery compared with surgery alone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients treated for esophageal cancer between 2006 and 2016. A total of 123 patients were identified; 70 were treated with surgery alone, and 53 were treated with NA CRT. Cardiac events were scored based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.03), and dosimetric data was compiled for all patients who received radiation. Univariate analysis and multivariable analysis (MVA) were performed to identify predictors of cardiac events. Competing risk of death regression was performed to a model the cumulative incidence of cardiac events.

RESULTS

The overall rates of grade ≥3 cardiac events were 24.5% in the NA CRT group versus 10% in the surgery group (P=0.04). On MVA, use of NA CRT (P<0.01, hazard ratio [HR]: 3.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.35-9.09) predicted for grade ≥3 cardiac events, though no dosimetric variable predicted for grade ≥3 cardiac events or overall survival. On MVA, NA CRT predicted for pericardial effusions of any grade (P<0.01, HR: 3.70, 95% CI: 1.67-8.33). The V45 Gy was the most significant predictor of pericardial effusions (P=0.012, HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.06) CONCLUSIONS:: NA CRT significantly increased the rate of grade ≥3 cardiac events compared with patients treated with surgery alone. Although no dosimetric parameter predicted for grade ≥3 cardiac events or survival, the V45 Gy predicted for pericardial effusions.

Intensity modulated radiation therapy in the treatment of esophageal cancer

Chemoradiation plays a core role in the definitive and preoperative management of esophageal cancer. Remarkable advances in technology now allow for the implementation of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to minimize normal organ damage and to maximize coverage of tumorous targets. While IMRT is commonly accepted in the treatment of prostate and head and neck cancers, there have been clinical and dosimetric studies supporting the use of IMRT in esophagus cancer. In addition, the IMRT technique was recently enhanced by the availability of volumetric intensity modulated arc therapy (VMAT). VMAT may allow for faster delivery of IMRT with the advantage of normal organ protection compared to the stop-and-shoot IMRT, with faster delivery time and reduced monitor units. This review summarizes the use of chemoradiation in esophageal cancer, discusses current dosimetric data and clinical outcomes with the use of IMRT, and reviews IMRT as part of multi-modality treatment in esophageal cancer.

Effects of neoadjuvant chemo or chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer on perioperative haemodynamics: A prospective cohort study within a randomised clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy might improve oncological outcome compared with chemotherapy after surgery for oesophagus or gastrooesophageal junction cancer. However, radiotherapy may induce cardiovascular side-effects that could increase the risk of perioperative adverse effects and postoperative morbidity.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative haemodynamics in patients undergoing oesophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for cancer.

DESIGN

A prospective single-centre cohort study within a randomised multi-centre trial.

SETTING

A Swedish University Hospital from January 2009 to March 2013.

PATIENTS

A total of 31 patients (chemotherapy 17, chemoradiotherapy 14) included in a multi-centre trial randomising chemotherapy vs. chemoradiotherapy and operated at Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge.

INTERVENTIONS

Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil, either with or without concurrent radiotherapy (40 Gy), were given prior to surgery. Cardiac function was assessed with LiDCOplus (LiDCO Ltd, London, United Kingdom), echocardiography, troponin T and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, before, during and after surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the interaction effect of the neoadjuvant treatment on stroke volume index during the perioperative period. Secondary outcomes were the interaction effects of oxygen delivery index, cardiac index, echocardiography and biochemical markers.

RESULTS

The groups were matched regarding comorbidities, but patients in the chemoradiotherapy group were older (66 vs. 60 years P = 0.03). Haemodynamic values changed in a similar way in both groups during the study period. The chemoradiotherapy group had a lower cardiac index before surgery (2.9 vs. 3.4 l min m, P = 0.03). On the third postoperative day, both groups displayed a hyperdynamic state compared with baseline, with no increase in troponin T, and a similar increase in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal or gastrooesophageal junction cancer seems to induce only a marginal negative effect on cardiac function compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This difference did not remain when patients' haemodynamics were challenged by surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01362127.

Valvular Heart Disease in Cancer Patients: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management

OPINION STATEMENT

Cardiac valvular disease as consequence of radiation and chemotherapy during treatment for malignancy is growing in its awareness. While the overwhelming emphasis in this population has been on the monitoring and preservation of left ventricular systolic function, we are now developing a greater appreciation for the plethora of cardiac sequelae beyond this basic model. To this end many institutions across the country have developed cardio-oncology programs, which are collaborative practices between oncologists and cardiologists in order to minimize a patient's cardiovascular risk while allowing them to receive the necessary treatment for their cancer. These programs also help to recognize early nuanced treatment complications such as valvular heart disease, and provide consultation for the most appropriate course of action. In this article we will discuss the etiology, prevalence, diagnosis, and current treatment options of valvular heart disease as the result of chemotherapy and radiation.

Radiation Therapy and Cardiac Death in Long-Term Survivors of Esophageal Cancer: An Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result Database

Objective

Radiation therapy (RT) for esophageal cancer often results in unintended radiation doses delivered to the heart owing to anatomic proximity. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we examined late cardiac death in survivors of esophageal cancer that had or had not received RT.

Methods

5,630 patients were identified that were diagnosed with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) or adenocarcinoma (AC) from 1973–2012, who were followed for at least 5 years after therapy. Examined risk factors for cardiac death included age (≤55/56-65/66-75/>75), gender, race (white/non-white), stage (local/regional/distant), histology (SCC/AC), esophageal location (<18cm/18-24cm/25-32cm/33-40cm from incisors), diagnosis year (1973-1992/1993-2002/2003-2012), and receipt of surgery and/or RT. Time to cardiac death was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox model was used to evaluate risk factors for cardiac death in propensity score matched data.

Results

Patients who received RT were younger, diagnosed more recently, had more advanced disease, SCC histology, and no surgery. The RT group had higher risk of cardiac death than the no-RT group (log-rank p<0.0001). The median time to cardiac death in the RT group was 289 months (95% CI, 255–367) and was not reached in the no-RT group. The probability of cardiac death increased with age and decreased with diagnosis year, and this trend was more pronounced in the RT group. Multivariate analysis found RT to be associated with higher probability of cardiac death (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.03–1.47, HR 1.961, 95% CI 1.466–2.624). Lower esophageal subsite (33–40 cm) was also associated with a higher risk of cardiac death. Other variables were not associated with cardiac death.

Conclusions

Recognizing the limitations of a SEER analysis including lack of comorbidity accountability, these data should prompt more definitive study as to whether a possible associative effect of RT on cardiac death could potentially be a causative effect.

Increased risk of death due to heart disease after radiotherapy for esophageal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risk of heart disease related death (HDRD) following radiation therapy (RT) for esophageal cancer (EC).

METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, two cohorts of patients with EC were created: (I) patients who received RT with their initial therapy; and (II) those who did not. Heart disease specific survival (HDSS) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Cox proportional-hazards regression methods were used for univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

We identified 40,778 patients with EC. A total of 26,377 patients received RT and 14,401 did not. HDSS analysis revealed increased risk of HDRD in those receiving RT (P<0.05), with an absolute risk of HDRD of 2.8%, 5.3% and 9.4% at 5-, 10- and 20-year, respectively. Log rank test of HDSS revealed the risk of HDRD became significant at 8 months (P<0.05). The following were associated with HDRD: RT, age, race, stage at presentation, time period of diagnosis, and known comorbid condition keeping one from esophagectomy. On multivariate analysis, RT remained predictive of HDRD [hazard ratio (HR) 1.46, P<0.05]. When considering only candidates for definitive therapy, RT remained predictive of HDRD on univariate (HR 1.53, P<0.0001) and multivariate (HR 1.62, P<0.0001) analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of RT leads to increased risk of HDRD that is detectable as early as eight months from diagnosis. More research is needed to define optimal dose volume parameters to prevent cardiac death. Consideration should be given to this risk in relation to prognosis and the expected benefits of RT.

Early detection of radiation-induced heart disease using (99m)Tc-MIBI SPECT gated myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with oesophageal cancer during radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The primary aim of this prospective study was to investigate the value of (99m)Tc-methoxyisobutylisonitrile (MIBI) single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) gated myocardial perfusion imaging (GMPI) in the detection of radiation-induced heart disease (RIHD) as early as during radiotherapy (RT) for oesophageal cancer (EC). The second aim was to analyse the correlation between cardiac toxicity and the dose-volume factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The (99m)Tc-MIBI SPECT GMPI was performed both pre-RT and during RT (40Gray). The results of the SPECT were quantitatively analysed with QGS/QPS software and read by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians. The correlation between the changes in the SPECT parameters and the RT dosimetric data was analysed.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients with locally advanced EC were enrolled in the study. Compared with the baseline, the imaging during RT showed not only significant decreases in the wall motion (WM) (1/20 segments), wall thickening (WT) (2/20 segments), end-diastolic perfusion (EDP) (5/20 segments) and end-systolic perfusion (ESP) (8/20 segments) (p<0.05) but also a significant increase in the heart rate (74.63±7.79 vs 81.49±9.90, p=0.036). New myocardial perfusion defects were observed in 8 of the 18 patients. The V37-V40 was significantly higher (p<0.05) in the patients with the new perfusion defects during RT than in the patients who did not exhibit these defects.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiotherapy for EC induces cardiac damage from an early stage. (99m)Tc-MIBI SPECT GMPI can detect the occurrence of cardiac impairment during RT. The WM, WT, EDP and ESP may be valuable as early indicators of RIHD. The percentage of the heart volume that receives a high dose is an important factor that is correlated with RIHD.

Morbidity and mortality after surgery for cancer of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction: A randomized clinical trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs. neoadjuvant chemoradiation

OBJECTIVE

To compare the incidence and severity of postoperative complications after oesophagectomy for carcinoma of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) after randomized accrual to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy improves long-term survival after oesophagectomy. To date, evidence is insufficient to determine whether combined nCT, or nCRT alone, is the most beneficial.

METHODS

Patients with carcinoma of the oesophagus or GOJ, resectable with a curative intention, were enrolled in this multicenter trial conducted at seven centres in Sweden and Norway. Study participants were randomized to nCT or nCRT followed by surgery with two-field lymphadenectomy. Three cycles of cisplatin/5-fluorouracil was administered in all patients, while 40 Gy of concomitant radiotherapy was administered in the nCRT group.

RESULTS

Of the randomized 181 patients, 91 were assigned to nCT and 90 to nCRT. One-hundred-and-fifty-five patients, 78 nCT and 77 nCRT, underwent resection. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the incidence of surgical or nonsurgical complications (P-value = 0.69 and 0.13, respectively). There was no 30-day mortality, while the 90-day mortality was 3% (2/78) in the nCT group and 6% (5/77) in the nCRT group (P = 0.24). The median Clavien-Dindo complication severity grade was significantly higher in the nCRT group (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between patients randomized to nCT and nCRT. However, complications were significantly more severe after nCRT.

REGISTRATION TRIAL DATABASE

The trial was registered in the Clinical Trials Database (registration number NCT01362127).

Effects on heart function of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in patients with cancer in the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction - a prospective cohort pilot study within a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy for cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal (GE)-junction is well established. The pros and cons of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy are debated. Chemoradiotherapy might impair cardiac function eliciting postoperative morbidity. The aim of this pilot study was to describe acute changes in left ventricular function following chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients with esophageal and (GE)-junction cancer enrolled at our center into a multicenter trial comparing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy were eligible. Patients were randomized to receive cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil with or without the addition of 40 Gy radiotherapy prior to surgery. Left ventricular function was evaluated using echocardiography and plasma N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) before and after neoadjuvant treatment. The primary outcome measure was left ventricular global strain (GS). Clinical effects were assessed using repeated exercise tests. Linear mixed models were used to analyze the effects of treatment group, and the interaction between groups.

RESULTS

40 patients participated (chemoradiotherapy, n=17; chemotherapy, n=23). In the chemoradiotherapy group there was no change in left ventricular global strain but mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) of the ventricular septum, early diastolic filling velocity (E-velocity), and the ratio of early to late ventricular filling velocities (E/A ratio) decreased significantly (p=0.02, p=0.01, and p=0.03, respectively). No changes were observed in the chemotherapy group. There was a trend towards an interaction effect for MAPSE sept and E (p=0.09 and p=0.09). NT-proBNP increased following chemoradiotherapy (p=0.05) but not after chemotherapy (p>0.99), and there was a trend towards an interaction effect (p=0.07). Working capacity decreased following neoadjuvant treatment (chemoradiotherapy p = 0.001, chemotherapy p=0.03) and was more pronounced after chemoradiotherapy with a trend towards an interaction effect (p=0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy but not chemotherapy before surgery for cancer of the esophagus or GE-junction seems to induce an acute negative effect on both systolic and diastolic left ventricular function. Future studies on neoadjuvant treatment for esophageal cancer are suggested to add measurements of cardiac function.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trials.gov NCT01362127 .

Is cardiac toxicity a relevant issue in the radiation treatment of esophageal cancer?

PURPOSE

In recent years several papers have been published on radiation-induced cardiac toxicity, especially in breast cancer patients. However, in esophageal cancer patients the radiation dose to the heart is usually markedly higher. To determine whether radiation-induced cardiac toxicity is also a relevant issue for this group, we conducted a review of the current literature.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in Medline for papers concerning cardiac toxicity in esophageal cancer patients treated with radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The overall crude incidence of symptomatic cardiac toxicity was as high as 10.8%. Toxicities corresponded with several dose-volume parameters of the heart. The most frequently reported complications were pericardial effusion, ischemic heart disease and heart failure.

CONCLUSION

Cardiac toxicity is a relevant issue in the treatment of esophageal cancer. However, valid Normal Tissue Complication Probability models for esophageal cancer are not available at present.

Women at increased risk for cardiac toxicity following chemoradiation therapy for esophageal carcinoma

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with cardiac toxicity in patients treated with chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for esophageal carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

One hundred twenty-seven patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus treated from July 2002 to June 2011 at 2 academic institutions with preoperative or definitive CRT were retrospectively reviewed. Association of cardiac toxicity with a number of variables was investigated, including heart disease, cardiac bypass and angioplasty, diabetes, insulin use, smoking, chemotherapy regimen, and tumor location. T test assessed risk of cardiac toxicity secondary to age. Dose volume histograms (DVH) were evaluated for percentage of heart volume receiving >20, 30, 40, and 50 Gy (V20-V50). The Fisher exact test analyzed for an association between dose volume parameters and cardiac toxicity.

RESULTS

Patient population included 100 men and 27 women with a mean age of 64 years. Median follow-up was 12.7 months (range, 0.3-99.6 months). Any cardiac toxicity occurred in 28 patients, the majority of which were pericardial effusion (23/28). Odds ratio for toxicity in women was 4.15 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.63-10.50; P = .0017) and time to cardiac toxicity by sex was significant (P = .0003). Patients above the median cutoff for V20, V30, and V40 had increased odds of developing cardiac toxicity (P = .03, .008, .002). There was 4.0 increased odds of developing cardiac toxicity with V40 >57% (95% CI, 1.5-10.3, P = .002). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, sex was the only variable associated with any cardiac toxicity and pericardial effusion (P = .0016, P = .0038). None of the other investigated variables were associated with increased risk of cardiac toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Female patients and dose greater than the median for V20-V40 were associated with the development of cardiac toxicity, specifically pericardial effusion. These data suggest exercising increased care when designing radiation fields in women undergoing CRT for esophageal carcinoma, as pericardial effusion may be a long-term complication.

Symptomatic cardiac toxicity is predicted by dosimetric and patient factors rather than changes in 18F-FDG PET determination of myocardial activity after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

To determine factors associated with symptomatic cardiac toxicity in patients with esophageal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 102 patients treated with chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Our primary endpoint was symptomatic cardiac toxicity. Radiation dosimetry, patient demographic factors, and myocardial changes seen on (18)F-FDG PET were correlated with subsequent cardiac toxicity. Cardiac toxicity measured by RTOG and CTCAE v3.0 criteria was identified by chart review.

RESULTS

During the follow up period, 12 patients were identified with treatment related cardiac toxicity, 6 of which were symptomatic. The mean heart V20 (79.7% vs. 67.2%, p=0.05), V30 (75.8% vs. 61.9%, p=0.04), and V40 (69.2% vs. 53.8%, p=0.03) were significantly higher in patients with symptomatic cardiac toxicity than those without. We found the threshold for symptomatic cardiac toxicity to be a V20, V30 and V40 above 70%, 65% and 60%, respectively. There was no correlation between change myocardial SUV on PET and cardiac toxicity, however, a greater proportion of women suffered symptomatic cardiac toxicity compared to men (p=0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

A correlation did not exist between percent change in myocardial SUV and cardiac toxicity. Patients with symptomatic cardiac toxicity received significantly greater mean V20, 30 and 40 values to the heart compared to asymptomatic patients. These data need validation in a larger independent data set.

Comparison of heart and coronary artery doses associated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for distal esophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83:1580-1586. [PMID: 22284687 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.10.053]

PURPOSE

To compare heart and coronary artery radiation exposure using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) vs. four-field three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) treatment plans for patients with distal esophageal cancer undergoing chemoradiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Nineteen patients with distal esophageal cancers treated with IMRT from March 2007 to May 2008 were identified. All patients were treated to 50.4 Gy with five-field IMRT plans. Theoretical 3D-CRT plans with four-field beam arrangements were generated. Dose-volume histograms of the planning target volume, heart, right coronary artery, left coronary artery, and other critical normal tissues were compared between the IMRT and 3D-CRT plans, and selected parameters were statistically evaluated using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

RESULTS

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment planning showed significant reduction (p < 0.05) in heart dose over 3D-CRT as assessed by average mean dose (22.9 vs. 28.2 Gy) and V30 (24.8% vs. 61.0%). There was also significant sparing of the right coronary artery (average mean dose, 23.8 Gy vs. 35.5 Gy), whereas the left coronary artery showed no significant improvement (mean dose, 11.2 Gy vs. 9.2 Gy), p = 0.11. There was no significant difference in percentage of total lung volume receiving at least 10, 15, or 20 Gy or in the mean lung dose between the planning methods. There were also no significant differences observed for the kidneys, liver, stomach, or spinal cord. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy achieved a significant improvement in target conformity as measured by the conformality index (ratio of total volume receiving 95% of prescription dose to planning target volume receiving 95% of prescription dose), with the mean conformality index reduced from 1.56 to 1.30 using IMRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of patients with distal esophageal cancer using IMRT significantly decreases the exposure of the heart and right coronary artery when compared with 3D-CRT. Long-term studies are necessary to determine how this will impact on development of coronary artery disease and other cardiac complications.

Volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for distal oesophageal malignancies

OBJECTIVES

Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is a novel form of intensity-modulated radiation therapy that allows the radiation dose to be delivered in a single gantry rotation using conformal or modulated fields. The capability of VMAT to reduce heart and cord dose, while maintaining lung receiving 20 Gy <20%, was evaluated for chemoradiation for oesophageal cancer.

METHODS

An optimised forward-planned four-field arrangement was compared with inverse-planned coplanar VMAT arcs with 35 control points for 10 patients with lower gastro-oesophageal tumours prescribed 54 Gy in 30 fractions. Conformal (cARC) and intensity-modulated (VMATi) arcs were considered. Plans were assessed and compared using the planning target volume (PTV) irradiated to 95% of the prescription dose (V95), volumes of lung irradiated to 20 Gy (V20), heart irradiated to 30 Gy (V30), spinal cord maximum dose and van't Riet conformation number (CN). The monitor units per fraction and delivery time were recorded for a single representative plan.

RESULTS

VMATi provided a significant reduction in the heart V30 (31% vs 55%; p=0.02) with better CN (0.72 vs 0.65; p=0.01) than the conformal plan. The treatment delivery was 1 min 28 s for VMAT compared with 3 min 15 s.

CONCLUSION

For similar PTV coverage, VMATi delivers a lower dose to organs at risk than conformal plans in a shorter time, and this has warranted clinical implementation.

Technological advances in radiotherapy for esophageal cancer

Radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy and surgery represent the main treatment modalities in esophageal cancer. The goal of modern radiotherapy approaches, based on recent technological advances, is to minimize post-treatment complications by improving the gross tumor volume definition (positron emission tomography-based planning), reducing interfraction motion (image-guided radiotherapy) and intrafraction motion (respiratory-gated radiotherapy), and by better dose delivery to the precisely defined planning target volume (intensity-modulated radiotherapy and proton therapy). Reduction of radiotherapy-related toxicity is fundamental to the improvement of clinical results in esophageal cancer, although the dose escalation concept is controversial.

Risk factors for pericardial effusion in inoperable esophageal cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation therapy

PURPOSE

To identify clinical and dosimetric factors influencing the risk of pericardial effusion (PCE) in patients with inoperable esophageal cancer treated with definitive concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy (RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data for 101 patients with inoperable esophageal cancer treated with concurrent chemotherapy and RT from 2000 to 2003 at our institution were analyzed. The PCE was confirmed from follow-up chest computed tomography scans and radiologic reports, with freedom from PCE computed from the end of RT. Log-rank tests were used to identify clinical and dosimetric factors influencing freedom from PCE. Dosimetric factors were calculated from the dose-volume histogram for the whole heart and pericardium.

RESULTS

The crude rate of PCE was 27.7% (28 of 101). Median time to onset of PCE was 5.3 months (range, 1.0-16.7 months) after RT. None of the clinical factors investigated was found to significantly influence the risk of PCE. In univariate analysis, a wide range of dose-volume histogram parameters of the pericardium and heart were associated with risk of PCE, including mean dose to the pericardium, volume of pericardium receiving a dose greater than 3 Gy (V3) to greater than 50 Gy (V50), and heart volume treated to greater than 32-38 Gy. Multivariate analysis selected V30 as the only parameter significantly associated with risk of PCE.

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose radiation to the pericardium may strongly increase the risk of PCE. Such a risk may be reduced by minimizing the dose-volume of the irradiated pericardium and heart.

Diagnosis and therapy in advanced cancer of the esophagus and the gastroesophageal junction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this article is to discuss recent developments in the diagnosis and treatment with curative option of advanced cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent data indicate improvement of clinical staging accuracy by multi-slice computer tomography, endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration and positron emission tomography, the latter gaining growing impact as a prognostic indicator. When combined with extended lymphadenectomy primary surgery offers 5-year survivals between 25 and 35% for stage III disease. Results of induction therapy remain conflicting. While the most recent meta-analysis favored induction chemoradiotherapy, a subsequent randomized trial failed to confirm this conclusion. A growing interest in adjuvant chemoradiotherapy is stimulated by promising results from a recent pilot study. Trials investigating definitive chemoradiotherapy indicate a high incidence of locoregional recurrence. The emerging understanding of the molecular pathways that govern neoplastic events are under intense investigation. Results of pilot clinical studies on targeted therapy are expected shortly.

SUMMARY

Refinements in staging offer incremental increase of accuracy, the impact of positron emission tomography becoming increasingly important. In locally advanced disease, the debate on the added value of multimodality therapy remains unsolved as primary surgery combined with extended lymphadenectomy offers equal results. New drugs in particular in combination with targeted therapy may offer better perspectives in the near future.