1
|
Müller M, Denzer UW, Kreuser N, Thieme R, Hoffmeister A, Feisthammel J, Niebisch S, Gockel I. [Diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders - Significance of the new Chicago classification v4.0]. Laryngorhinootologie 2023; 102:742-753. [PMID: 37253378 DOI: 10.1055/a-1949-3531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Esophageal motility disorders are diseases in which there are malfunctions of the act of swallowing due to a change in neuromuscular structures. The main symptom is therefore dysphagia for solid and/or liquid foods, often accompanied by symptoms such as chest pain, regurgitation, heartburn, and weight loss. Esophageal manometry is the gold standard in diagnostics. Endoscopy and radiology serve to exclude inflammatory or malignant changes. With the introduction of high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM), the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders has improved and led to a new classification with the Chicago Classification, which has been modified several times in the last decade, most recently in 2021 with the Chicago Classification v4.0. Compared to the previous version 3.0, there are some important changes that are presented based on the most important esophageal motility disorders in everyday clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michaela Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gastroenterologie, Endokrinologie, Stoffwechsel und klinische Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg - Standort Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Ulrike W Denzer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gastroenterologie, Endokrinologie, Stoffwechsel und klinische Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg - Standort Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Nicole Kreuser
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitatsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - René Thieme
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitatsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Albrecht Hoffmeister
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitatsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Juergen Feisthammel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitatsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Stefan Niebisch
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitatsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Ines Gockel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitatsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
García-Zermeño KR, Argüero J, Amieva-Balmori M, Rodríguez-Aguilera O, Martínez-Conejo A, Marcolongo M, Remes-Troche JM. Clinical utility of the solid meal test during high-resolution esophageal manometry. A study in a Latin American population. Rev Gastroenterol Mex (Engl Ed) 2023:S2255-534X(23)00069-5. [PMID: 37419857 DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmxen.2023.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS The solid test meal (STM) is a challenge test that is done during esophageal manometry and appears to increase the diagnostic yield of the study. The aim of our analysis was to establish the normal values for STM and evaluate its clinical utility in a group of Latin American patients with esophageal disorders versus healthy controls. MATERIAL AND METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted on a group of healthy controls and consecutive patients that underwent high-resolution esophageal manometry, in which STM was done at the final part of the study and consisted of asking the subjects to eat 200 g of precooked rice. The results were compared during the conventional protocol and the STM. RESULTS Twenty-five controls and 93 patients were evaluated. The majority of the controls (92%) completed the test in under 8 min. The STM changed the manometric diagnosis in 38% of the cases. The STM diagnosed 21% more major motor disorders than the conventional protocol; it doubled the cases of esophageal spasm and quadrupled the cases of jackhammer esophagus, whereas it demonstrated normal esophageal peristalsis in 43% of the cases with a previous diagnosis of ineffective esophageal motility. CONCLUSIONS Our study confirms the fact that complementary STM during esophageal manometry adds information and enables a more physiologic assessment of esophageal motor function to be made, compared with liquid swallows, in patients with esophageal motor disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K R García-Zermeño
- Laboratorio de Fisiología Digestiva y Motilidad Gastrointestinal, Instituto de Investigaciones Médico-Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Veracruz, Mexico
| | - J Argüero
- Unidad de Neurogastroenterología, Departamento de Gastroenterología, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - M Amieva-Balmori
- Laboratorio de Fisiología Digestiva y Motilidad Gastrointestinal, Instituto de Investigaciones Médico-Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Veracruz, Mexico
| | - O Rodríguez-Aguilera
- Laboratorio de Fisiología Digestiva y Motilidad Gastrointestinal, Instituto de Investigaciones Médico-Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Veracruz, Mexico
| | - A Martínez-Conejo
- Laboratorio de Fisiología Digestiva y Motilidad Gastrointestinal, Instituto de Investigaciones Médico-Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Veracruz, Mexico
| | - M Marcolongo
- Unidad de Neurogastroenterología, Departamento de Gastroenterología, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - J M Remes-Troche
- Laboratorio de Fisiología Digestiva y Motilidad Gastrointestinal, Instituto de Investigaciones Médico-Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Veracruz, Mexico.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Müller M, Denzer UW, Kreuser N, Thieme R, Hoffmeister A, Feisthammel J, Niebisch S, Gockel I. [Diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders - Significance of the new Chicago classification v4.0]. Z Gastroenterol 2023; 61:284-296. [PMID: 35839796 DOI: 10.1055/a-1833-9366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Esophageal motility disorders are diseases in which there are malfunctions of the act of swallowing due to a change in neuromuscular structures. The main symptom is therefore dysphagia for solid and/or liquid foods, often accompanied by symptoms such as chest pain, regurgitation, heartburn, and weight loss. Esophageal manometry is the gold standard in diagnostics. Endoscopy and radiology serve to exclude inflammatory or malignant changes. With the introduction of high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM), the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders has improved and led to a new classification with the Chicago Classification, which has been modified several times in the last decade, most recently in 2021 with the Chicago Classification v4.0. Compared to the previous version 3.0, there are some important changes that are presented based on the most important esophageal motility disorders in everyday clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michaela Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gastroenterologie, Endokrinologie, Stoffwechsel und klinische Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg - Standort Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Ulrike W Denzer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gastroenterologie, Endokrinologie, Stoffwechsel und klinische Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg - Standort Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Nicole Kreuser
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitatsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - René Thieme
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitatsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Albrecht Hoffmeister
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitatsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Juergen Feisthammel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitatsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Stefan Niebisch
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitatsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Ines Gockel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitatsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Babaei A, Shad S, Massey BT. Esophageal hypercontractility is abolished by cholinergic blockade. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2021; 33:e14017. [PMID: 33185322 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Revised: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Esophageal hypercontractility (EHC) is considered a major esophageal motor disorder of unclear etiology. Different mechanisms have been proposed, including an imbalance in inhibitory and excitatory esophageal innervation. We hypothesized that patients with EHC suffer from cholinergic hyperactivity. AIM To interrogate the excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission in EHC by assessing the esophageal motor response to atropine (ATR) and cholecystokinin (CCK), respectively, in EHC patients. METHOD We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent high-resolution manometry (HRM) with pharmacologic challenge in a tertiary referral center between 2007 and 2017. We identified 49 EHC patients who were categorized based on frequency of hypercontractile peristaltic sequence into "frequent" and "infrequent" and motility diagnosis groups. Deglutitive pressure metrics and esophageal motor responses to ATR (12 mcg/kg iv) and CCK (40 ng/kg iv) were analyzed across groups. RESULTS Atropine abolished hypercontractility across all groups studied, converting nearly half of patients to a motor pattern of ineffective esophageal motility. Abnormal CCK responses primarily occurred in the patient groups with concomitant outflow obstruction. CONCLUSIONS Hypercontractility is cholinergically mediated in all esophageal motor disorders. Most patients with isolated EHC appear to have excessive cholinergic drive, rather than loss of inhibitory innervation, and might be candidates for treatment with anticholinergic agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arash Babaei
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Sadaf Shad
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Benson T Massey
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Khan A, Yadlapati R, Gonlachanvit S, Katzka DA, Park MI, Vaezi M, Vela M, Pandolfino J. Chicago Classification update (version 4.0): Technical review on diagnostic criteria for achalasia. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2021; 33:e14182. [PMID: 34190376 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The recommended diagnostic criteria for achalasia have been recently updated by Chicago Classification version 4.0 (CCv4.0), the widely accepted classification scheme for esophageal motility disorders using metrics from high-resolution manometry (HRM). CCv4.0 continued upon prior versions by subtyping achalasia into type I, type II, and type III on HRM. The achalasia subgroup of the CCv4.0 Working Group developed both conclusive and inconclusive statements for the HRM diagnoses of achalasia subtypes. Conclusive achalasia on HRM is defined as an abnormal median integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) in the primary position of wet swallows along with 100% failed peristalsis, with type I achalasia having 100% failed peristalsis without panesophageal pressurization (PEP), type II achalasia with PEP in at least 20% of swallows, and type III achalasia having at least 20% of swallows premature with no appreciable peristalsis. An inconclusive HRM diagnosis of achalasia can arise when there is an integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) that is borderline or at the upper limit of normal in at least one position, there is an abnormal IRP in both positions but evidence of peristalsis with PEP or premature swallows, or there is peristalsis in the secondary position after apparent achalasia in the primary position. In patients with dysphagia and an inconclusive HRM diagnosis of achalasia, supportive testing beyond HRM such as a timed barium esophagram (TBE) for functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) is recommended. The review recommends a diagnostic algorithm for achalasia, discusses therapeutic options for the disease, and outlines future needs on this topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abraham Khan
- Center for Esophageal Health, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rena Yadlapati
- Center for Esophageal Diseases, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Sutep Gonlachanvit
- Center of Excellence on Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Division of Gastroenterology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Moo In Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Michael Vaezi
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - John Pandolfino
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fox MR, Sweis R, Yadlapati R, Pandolfino J, Hani A, Defilippi C, Jan T, Rommel N. Chicago classification version 4.0 © technical review: Update on standard high-resolution manometry protocol for the assessment of esophageal motility. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2021; 33:e14120. [PMID: 33729668 PMCID: PMC8268048 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The Chicago Classification v4.0 (CCv4.0) is the updated classification scheme for esophageal motility disorders using metrics from high-resolution manometry (HRM). A key feature of CCv.4.0 is the more rigorous and expansive protocol that incorporates single wet swallows acquired in different positions (supine, upright) and provocative testing, including multiple rapid swallows and rapid drink challenge. Additionally, solid bolus swallows, solid test meal, and/or pharmacologic provocation can be used to identify clinically relevant motility disorders and other conditions (eg, rumination) that occur during and after meals. The acquisition and analysis for performing these tests and the evidence supporting their inclusion in the Chicago Classification protocol is detailed in this technical review. Provocative tests are designed to increase the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of HRM studies for disorders of esophageal motility. These changes attempt to minimize ambiguity in prior iterations of Chicago Classification, decrease the proportion of HRM studies that deliver inconclusive diagnoses and increase the number of patients with a clinically relevant diagnosis that can direct effective therapy. Another aim in establishing a standard manometry protocol for motility laboratories around the world is to facilitate procedural consistency, improve diagnostic reliability, and promote collaborative research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark R. Fox
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Rami Sweis
- Digestive Function: Basel, Laboratory and Clinic for Motility Disorders and Functional Digestive Diseases, Arlesheim, Switzerland
| | - Rena Yadlapati
- Center for Esophageal Diseases, Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - John Pandolfino
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Albis Hani
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana-Hospital San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia
| | | | - Tack Jan
- University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Nathalie Rommel
- Translational Research in GastroIntestinal Disorders (TARGID, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
The esophagogastric junction (EGJ) is a complex barrier between the thoracic and abdominal luminal gut compartments, comprised primarily of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and crural diaphragm. Although closed at rest, the EGJ relaxes to allow antegrade bolus transit and retrograde venting of air. Abnormal relaxation is the hallmark of achalasia spectrum disorders, while increased frequency of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations and/or EGJ disruption are seen in gastroesophageal reflux disease. High resolution manometry (HRM) is the modern day gold standard for assessment of EGJ morphology and function, with better performance characteristics compared with endoscopy and barium esophagography. Conventional LES metrics defining EGJ function include resting LES pressure as well as postswallow residual pressures. Newer HRM-based metrics include EGJ contractile integral, which measures static barrier function at rest, and EGJ morphology, which characterizes the relationship between LES and crural diaphragm. Provocative maneuvers assess dynamic EGJ function during physiological or pharmacologic stress. The most useful of these maneuvers, the rapid drink challenge, assesses for latent obstruction, while multiple rapid swallows evaluate adequacy of deglutitive inhibition. Amyl nitrate and cholecystokinin administration can segregate motor from structural obstruction. Newer provocative tests (straight leg raise maneuver, abdominal compression) and novel diagnostic tools (functional lumen imaging probe) complement HRM evaluation of the EGJ. Although current HRM metrics and maneuvers show promise in identifying clinically relevant EGJ abnormalities, future investigations evaluating management outcomes will improve segregation of normal from abnormal EGJ morphology and function.
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) assesses esophageal motor function and is indicated both for evaluation of esophageal symptoms and before antireflux interventions. HRM studies are interpreted and esophageal motor diagnoses made according to the Chicago Classification, version 3.0 algorithm, which is based on ten 5 mL supine water swallows. However, this practice of single liquid swallows performed in the supine position does not reflect typical "real-life" swallowing, and may not reproduce the patient's presenting symptoms. Therefore, provocative maneuvers at HRM-beyond these 10 standard swallows-can afford additional insights into esophageal motor function with clinically significant implications, and represent areas of exciting investigation and innovation. Accordingly, the 2020 American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines on Esophageal Physiologic Testing conditionally recommend their inclusion in the HRM protocol. In this clinical review, we discuss the supporting data for and clinical utility of provocative maneuvers at HRM that include changes in body position or accessories (upright swallows, "bridge" position, straight leg raise, abdominal compression), bolus consistency (solid swallows, test meals, postprandial high-resolution impedance manometry), bolus frequency (multiple rapid swallows), the volume of bolus (rapid drink challenge/multiple water swallows), and the use of pharmacological agents.
Collapse
|
9
|
Yadlapati R, Kahrilas PJ, Fox MR, Bredenoord AJ, Gyawali CP, Roman S, Babaei A, Mittal RK, Rommel N, Savarino E, Sifrim D, Smout A, Vaezi MF, Zerbib F, Akiyama J, Bhatia S, Bor S, Carlson DA, Chen JW, Cisternas D, Cock C, Coss-Adame E, de Bortoli N, Defilippi C, Fass R, Ghoshal UC, Gonlachanvit S, Hani A, Hebbard GS, Jung KW, Katz P, Katzka DA, Khan A, Kohn GP, Lazarescu A, Lengliner J, Mittal SK, Omari T, In Park M, Penagini R, Pohl D, Richter JE, Serra J, Sweis R, Tack J, Tatum RP, Tutuian R, Vela MF, Wong RK, Wu JC, Xiao Y, Pandolfino JE. Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0 ©. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2021; 33:e14058. [PMID: 33373111 PMCID: PMC8034247 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 359] [Impact Index Per Article: 119.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Revised: 11/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Chicago Classification v4.0 (CCv4.0) is the updated classification scheme for esophageal motility disorders using metrics from high-resolution manometry (HRM). Fifty-two diverse international experts separated into seven working subgroups utilized formal validated methodologies over two-years to develop CCv4.0. Key updates in CCv.4.0 consist of a more rigorous and expansive HRM protocol that incorporates supine and upright test positions as well as provocative testing, a refined definition of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow obstruction (EGJOO), more stringent diagnostic criteria for ineffective esophageal motility and description of baseline EGJ metrics. Further, the CCv4.0 sought to define motility disorder diagnoses as conclusive and inconclusive based on associated symptoms, and findings on provocative testing as well as supportive testing with barium esophagram with tablet and/or functional lumen imaging probe. These changes attempt to minimize ambiguity in prior iterations of Chicago Classification and provide more standardized and rigorous criteria for patterns of disorders of peristalsis and obstruction at the EGJ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rena Yadlapati
- Center for Esophageal Diseases, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Peter J. Kahrilas
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mark R. Fox
- University of Zürich, CH-8091 Zürich & Department of Gastroenterology, Klinik Arlesheim, CH-4144 Arlesheim
| | - Albert J. Bredenoord
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C. Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Sabine Roman
- Univ Lyon, Université Lyon I, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Digestive Physiology, F-69003, Lyon, France,Univ Lyon, Université Lyon I, Hospices Civils de Lyon, INSERM, LabTAU, F-69003, Lyon, France
| | | | - Ravinder K. Mittal
- Center for Esophageal Diseases, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA,Veteran Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Nathalie Rommel
- University of Leuven, Neurosciences, Experimental ORL, Deglutology - University Hospitals Leuven Dept Gastroenterology, Neurogastroenterology & Motility
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Daniel Sifrim
- Wingate institute of Neurogastroenterology, Queen Mary University of London
| | - André Smout
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Frank Zerbib
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Gastroenterology department; Université de Bordeaux; INSERM CIC 1401; Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | - Serhat Bor
- Ege University School of Medicine, Div. Gastroenterology, Turkey
| | - Dustin A. Carlson
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Daniel Cisternas
- Clínica Alemana de Santiago, Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo. Santiago, Chile
| | | | - Enrique Coss-Adame
- Gastroenterology Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición “Salvador Zubirán”
| | - Nicola de Bortoli
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa
| | | | - Ronnie Fass
- MetroHealth System and case Western Reserve University
| | - Uday C. Ghoshal
- Dept. of Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Sutep Gonlachanvit
- Excellence Center on Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand
| | - Albis Hani
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana-Hospital San Ignacio, Colombia
| | | | - Kee Wook Jung
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | | | - Abraham Khan
- New York University, Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Taher Omari
- College of Medicine & Public Health, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia
| | - Moo In Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Roberto Penagini
- Gastroenterology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico and Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniel Pohl
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Joel E. Richter
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida
| | - Jordi Serra
- University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol. Badalona. CIBERehd
| | - Rami Sweis
- University College London Hospital, United Kingdom
| | - Jan Tack
- TARGID, University of Leuven, Belgium
| | - Roger P. Tatum
- University of Washington Department of Surgery/VA Puget Sound HCS
| | - Radu Tutuian
- Bürgerspital Solothurn, University of Bern, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Reuben K. Wong
- Yong Loo Lin of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Justin C. Wu
- The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Yinglian Xiao
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, China
| | - John E. Pandolfino
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
In their article "Use of the Functional Lumen Imaging Probe in Clinical Esophagology," Savarino et al. report the outcomes of a Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation analysis performed by experts in the use of functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) evaluation of esophageal disorders. For essentially all clinical indications, the recommendation for use was conditional with a very low quality of evidence. FLIP is an expensive, invasive technology examining limited aspects of esophageal function. Its role in complementing or replacing existing technology is uncertain, particularly when compared with manometric testing with additional provocative studies. Performing properly designed studies to demonstrate FLIP's true effectiveness and cost-effectiveness will be costly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benson T Massey
- GI Manometry Laboratory, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Hub for Collaborative Medicine, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|