Cytosolic 5'-nucleotidase 1A autoantibody profile and clinical characteristics in inclusion body myositis

Sporadic Inclusion Body Myositis at the Crossroads between Muscle Degeneration, Inflammation, and Aging

Sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM) is the most common muscle disease of older people and is clinically characterized by slowly progressive asymmetrical muscle weakness, predominantly affecting the quadriceps, deep finger flexors, and foot extensors. At present, there are no enduring treatments for this relentless disease that eventually leads to severe disability and wheelchair dependency. Although sIBM is considered a rare muscle disorder, its prevalence is certainly higher as the disease is often undiagnosed or misdiagnosed. The histopathological phenotype of sIBM muscle biopsy includes muscle fiber degeneration and endomysial lymphocytic infiltrates that mainly consist of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells surrounding nonnecrotic muscle fibers expressing MHCI. Muscle fiber degeneration is characterized by vacuolization and the accumulation of congophilic misfolded multi-protein aggregates, mainly in their non-vacuolated cytoplasm. Many players have been identified in sIBM pathogenesis, including environmental factors, autoimmunity, abnormalities of protein transcription and processing, the accumulation of several toxic proteins, the impairment of autophagy and the ubiquitin-proteasome system, oxidative and nitrative stress, endoplasmic reticulum stress, myonuclear degeneration, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Aging has also been proposed as a contributor to the disease. However, the interplay between these processes and the primary event that leads to the coexistence of autoimmune and degenerative changes is still under debate. Here, we outline our current understanding of disease pathogenesis, focusing on degenerative mechanisms, and discuss the possible involvement of aging.

Autoimmune inflammatory myopathy biomarkers

The autoimmune inflammatory myopathy disease spectrum, commonly known as myositis, is a group of systemic diseases that mainly affect the muscles, skin and lungs. Biomarker assessment helps in understanding disease mechanisms, allowing for the implementation of precise strategies in the classification, diagnosis, and management of these diseases. This review examines the pathogenic mechanisms and highlights current data on blood and tissue biomarkers of autoimmune inflammatory myopathies.

Pathogenic role of anti-cN1A autoantibodies in sporadic inclusion body myositis

BACKGROUND

Sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM) is an intractable muscle disease that frequently affects elderly people. Autoantibodies recognising cytosolic 5'-nucleotidase 1A (cN1A) were found in the sera of patients with sIBM. However, the pathogenic role of the autoantibodies remained unknown. This study investigated the pathogenic properties of the autoantibodies using active cN1A peptides immunisation.

METHODS

Wild-type C57BL6 mice were injected with three different mouse cN1A peptides corresponding to the previously reported epitope sequences of human cN1A. After confirming the production of autoantibodies to the corresponding cN1A peptides in each group, changes in body weight, exercise capacity by treadmill test and histological changes in mice injected with cN1A peptides or controls were investigated.

RESULTS

Autoantibodies against cN1A were detected in serum samples from mice injected with cN1A peptide. Some groups of mice injected with cN1A peptide showed significant weight loss and decreased motor activity. The number of myofibres with internal nuclei increased in all the peptide-injected groups, with surrounding or invading CD8-positive T cells into myofibres, abnormal protein aggregates and overexpression of p62 and LC3.

CONCLUSIONS

Active cN1A peptide immunisation partially reproduced the clinical and histological aspects of sIBM in wild-type mice. The murine model demonstrates the pathogenic properties of anti-cN1A autoantibodies to cause sIBM-like histological changes.

From data to diagnosis: how machine learning is revolutionizing biomarker discovery in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are a heterogeneous group of muscle disorders including adult and juvenile dermatomyositis, polymyositis, immune-mediated necrotising myopathy and sporadic inclusion body myositis, all of which present with variable symptoms and disease progression. The identification of effective biomarkers for IIMs has been challenging due to the heterogeneity between IIMs and within IIM subgroups, but recent advances in machine learning (ML) techniques have shown promises in identifying novel biomarkers. This paper reviews recent studies on potential biomarkers for IIM and evaluates their clinical utility. We also explore how data analytic tools and ML algorithms have been used to identify biomarkers, highlighting their potential to advance our understanding and diagnosis of IIM and improve patient outcomes. Overall, ML techniques have great potential to revolutionize biomarker discovery in IIMs and lead to more effective diagnosis and treatment.

Study to Assess Content Validity and Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of the Inclusion Body Myositis Functional Rating Scale

Background and Objectives

Sporadic inclusion body myositis (IBM) is a rare, muscle-wasting disease that negatively affects health-related quality of life. Although a measure that has been developed to assess the impact of IBM, the IBM Functional Rating Scale (IBMFRS) has limited evidence of content validity or reliability, and what constitutes a meaningful change threshold; this study was conducted to address these gaps.

Methods

Adult patients with a clinical diagnosis of IBM from the United Kingdom and disease area expert health care professionals from the United States and United Kingdom took part in this study. This study consisted of 5 stages including phone interviews (physicians), face-to-face interviews (patients), face-to-face ratings, phone ratings, and ratings of videos using the IBMFRS.

Results

The IBMFRS adequately captures all core functional impacts of IBM, which was corroborated by both patient participants and physicians when debriefing the measure. Physicians and patient participants all thought any change on the measure would be meaningful change for a patient, either improvement or worsening. The quantitative analysis demonstrated good interrater reliability for face-to-face ratings (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] >0.7) and for video ratings (ICC >0.9). Intrarater reliability was excellent for face-to-face and video ratings (ICC >0.9). Equivalence between the modes of administration, face-to-face vs phone, was also excellent (ICC >0.9).

Discussion

The IBMFRS is content valid in assessing the key functional impacts of IBM, and any change would be meaningful. It is reliable both within and across raters, and there is equivalence between different modes of administration (face-to-face vs phone).

Myositis-related autoantibody profile and clinical characteristics stratified by anti-cytosolic 5'-nucleotidase 1A status in connective tissue diseases

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Cytosolic 5'-nucleotidase 1A (cN-1A) autoantibodies have been recognized as myositis-related autoantibodies. However, their correlations with clinical characteristics and other myositis-specific and myositis-associated autoantibodies (MSAs/MAAs) are still unclear. We aimed to establish the prevalence and clinical and laboratory associations of cN-1A autoantibodies in a cohort of patients with connective tissue diseases.

METHODS

A total of 567 participants (182 idiopathic inflammatory myopathies [IIM], 164 systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE], 121 systemic sclerosis [SSc], and 100 blood donors [BD]) were tested for the presence of cN-1A autoantibodies and other myositis-specific and myositis-associated autoantibodies (MSAs/MAAs). Clinical and laboratory characteristics were compared between anti-cN-1A positive and negative patients with sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM) and between anti-cN-1A positive and negative patients with non-IBM IIM.

RESULTS

In the sIBM cohort, 30 patients (46.9%) were anti-cN-1A positive vs. 18 (15.2%) in the non-IBM IIM cohort, 17 (10%) were anti-cN-1A positive in the SLE cohort and none in the SSc or the BD cohorts. Anti-cN-1A positivity had an overall sensitivity of 46.9% and a specificity of 93.2% for sIBM. Dysphagia was more frequent in the anti-cN-1A positive vs. negative sIBM patients (p = .04). In the non-IBM IIM group, being anti-cN-1A antibody positive was associated with the diagnosis polymyositis (p = .04) and overlap-myositis (p = .04) and less disease damage evaluated by physician global damage score (p < .001).

DISCUSSION

cN-1A autoantibodies were predominantly found in IIM patients and was associated with dysphagia in sIBM patients. Notably, anti-cN-1A appears to identify a distinct phenotype of anti-cN-1A positive non-IBM IIM patients with a milder disease course.

Clinical Subgroups and Factors Associated With Progression in Patients With Inclusion Body Myositis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Sporadic inclusion body myositis (IBM) is the most common acquired myopathy in individuals older than 50 years. The disorder is slowly progressive, and although many therapies have been investigated, response has generally been poor. Clinical heterogeneity may influence treatment responsiveness; however, data regarding heterogeneity in IBM are limited and often conflicting. We aim to identify clinically distinct subgroups within a large IBM cohort and prognostic factors for disease progression.

METHODS

Clinical, histologic, radiologic, and electrophysiologic data were analyzed for all patients with IBM and other forms of myositis enrolled in a longitudinal cohort from The Johns Hopkins Myositis Center from 2003 to 2018. Patients with IBM were included if they met at least one of the following criteria: Griggs possible, European Neuromuscular Centre 2011 probable, or Lloyd-Greenberg data-derived criteria for IBM. Univariate, multivariate, and graphical analyses were used to identify prognostic factors in patients with IBM. Thus, linear and logistic regressions were used to adjust for potential confounding variables. The evolution of creatine kinase and muscle strength was studied using multilevel linear regression models. Nonmodifiable risk factors (sex, race, disease duration, and age at the onset of first symptoms) were used as adjusting covariates for the regression analyses.

RESULTS

Among the 335 patients meeting the inclusion criteria for IBM, 64% were male with an average age of disease onset of 58.7 years and delay to diagnosis of 5.2 years. Initial misdiagnosis (52%) and immunosuppressant treatment (42%) were common. Less than half (43%) of muscle biopsies demonstrated all 3 pathologic hallmarks: endomysial inflammation, mononuclear cell invasion, and rimmed vacuoles. Black patients had significantly weaker arm abductors, hip flexors, and knee flexors compared with non-Black patients. Female patients had stronger finger flexors and knee extensors compared with their male counterparts. Younger age (<50 years) at onset was not associated with increased weakness.

DISCUSSION

Our study demonstrates that female and Black patients have distinct clinical phenotypes and trajectories within the overarching IBM clinical phenotype. These subgroups may have different responses to therapies, which may influence the design of future clinical trials in IBM.

Inclusion Body Myositis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article highlights the clinical and diagnostic features of inclusion body myositis (IBM) and provides recent insights into the pathomechanisms and therapeutic strategies of the disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

IBM is an often-misdiagnosed myopathy subtype. Due to the insidious onset and slow progression of muscle weakness, it can often be dismissed as a sign of aging as it commonly presents in older adults. While challenging to recognize upon initial clinical evaluation, the recent recognition of specialized stains highlighting features seen on muscle pathology, the use of diagnostic tools such as the anti-cytosolic 5'-nucleotidase 1A antibody biomarker, and the ability of muscle imaging to detect patterns of preferential muscle involvement seen in IBM has allowed for earlier diagnosis of the disease than was previously possible. While the pathogenesis of IBM has historically been poorly understood, several ongoing studies point toward mechanisms of autophagy and highly differentiated cytotoxic T cells that are postulated to be pathogenic in IBM.

SUMMARY

Overall advancements in our understanding of IBM have resulted in improvements in the management of the disease and are the foundation of several strategies for current and upcoming novel therapeutic drug trials in IBM.

Inclusion body myositis: evolving concepts

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss recent developments in our understanding of epidemiology, diagnostics, biomarkers, pathology, pathogenesis, outcome measures, and therapeutics in inclusion body myositis (IBM).

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent epidemiology data confirms a relatively higher prevalence in the population aged above 50 years and the reduced life expectancy. Association with cancer and other systemic disorders is better defined. The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound in diagnosis as well as in following disease progression has been elucidated. There are new blood and imaging biomarkers that show tremendous promise for diagnosis and as outcome measures in therapeutic trials. Improved understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease will lead to better therapeutic interventions, but also highlights the importance to have sensitive and responsive outcome measures that accurately quantitate change.

SUMMARY

There are exciting new developments in our understanding of IBM which should lead to improved management and therapeutic options.

Inclusion body myositis: Update on the diagnostic and therapeutic landscape

Inclusion body myositis (IBM) is a progressive muscle disease affecting patients over the age of 40, with distinctive clinical and histopathological features. The typical clinical phenotype is characterized by prominent involvement of deep finger flexors and quadriceps muscles. Less common presentations include isolated dysphagia, asymptomatic hyper-CKemia, and axial or limb weakness beyond the typical pattern. IBM is associated with marked morbidity as majority of patients eventually become wheelchair dependent with limited use of their hands and marked dysphagia. Furthermore, IBM mildly affects longevity with aspiration pneumonia and respiratory complications being the most common cause of death. On muscle biopsy, IBM is characterized by a peculiar combination of endomysial inflammation, rimmed vacuoles, and protein aggregation. These histopathological features are reflective of the complexity of underlying disease mechanisms. No pharmacological treatment is yet available for IBM. Monitoring for swallowing and respiratory complications, exercise, and addressing mobility issues are the mainstay of management. Further research is needed to better understand disease pathogenesis and identify novel therapeutic targets.

Autoantibodies: Pathogenic or epiphenomenon

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are heterogeneous autoimmune diseases. There are distinct subgroups, including antisynthetase syndrome, dermatomyositis, polymyositis, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, and sporadic inclusion body myositis. In patients with IIM, autoantibodies are present in up to 80% of the patients. These autoantibodies are often characterized as myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSA) or myositis-associated autoantibodies (MAA). The recognition of the importance of autoantibodies, especially MSA, is increasing in recent years. In this chapter, we provide an overview of the MSAs, including some new autoantibodies of interest as they target mainly muscle-specific autoantigen, in clinical classification, the measurement of the disease activity, and a possible role in the pathogenesis in the patients with IIM.

Inclusion Body Myositis and Neoplasia: A Narrative Review

Inclusion body myositis (IBM) is an acquired, late-onset inflammatory myopathy, with both inflammatory and degenerative pathogenesis. Although idiopathic inflammatory myopathies may be associated with malignancies, IBM is generally not considered paraneoplastic. Many studies of malignancy in inflammatory myopathies did not include IBM patients. Indeed, IBM is often diagnosed only after around 5 years from onset, while paraneoplastic myositis is generally defined as the co-occurrence of malignancy and myopathy within 1 to 3 years of each other. Nevertheless, a significant association with large granular lymphocyte leukemia has been recently described in IBM, and there are reports of cancer-associated IBM. We review the pathogenic mechanisms supposed to be involved in IBM and outline the common mechanisms in IBM and malignancy, as well as the therapeutic perspectives. The terminally differentiated, CD8+ highly cytotoxic T cells expressing NK features are central in the pathogenesis of IBM and, paradoxically, play a role in some cancers as well. Interferon gamma plays a central role, mostly during the early stages of the disease. The secondary mitochondrial dysfunction, the autophagy and cell cycle dysregulation, and the crosstalk between metabolic and mitogenic pathways could be shared by IBM and cancer. There are intermingled subcellular mechanisms in IBM and neoplasia, and probably their co-existence is underestimated. The link between IBM and cancers deserves further interest, in order to search for efficient therapies in IBM and to improve muscle function, life quality, and survival in both diseases.

Possible future avenues for myositis therapeutics: DM, IMNM and IBM

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) represent a heterogeneous group of systemic autoimmune diseases characterized by immune-mediated muscle injury. As insights into pathogenesis of IIM evolve, novel therapeutic strategies have become available to optimize outcomes. Herein, we summarize novel and emerging strategies in the management of dermatomyositis (DM), immunemediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM), and inclusion body myositis (IBM).

Epidemiology, survival and clinical characteristics of inclusion body myositis

OBJECTIVE

We performed a population-based study on inclusion body myositis with the primary aims to define the prevalence, survival rate and incidence and to investigate the symptom profiles associated with disease duration and sex over a 33-year period.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed between 1985 and 2017 in Region Västra Götaland, Sweden were identified according to the European Neuromuscular Centre diagnostic criteria from 2011.

RESULTS

We identified 128 patients, 89 men and 39 women with the strict clinico-pathologically definition of inclusion body myositis. The prevalence was 32 per million inhabitants, 19 per million women and 45 per million men December 31st 2017. Mean incidence was 2.5 per million inhabitants and year. Mean age at symptom onset was 64.4 years with quadriceps weakness being the most common presenting symptom followed by finger flexor weakness. Dysphagia was a common presenting symptom being more frequent in women (23%) than men (10%) and was during the disease course reported in 74% of men and 84% of women. Seventy-three patients were deceased, with mean survival of 14 years from symptom onset. Survival rate from both diagnosis date and symptom onset was decreased compared to the matched population. Twenty-one percent of the patients had an additional autoimmune disease. A cross-sectional analysis of autoantibodies in 50 patients and 28 matched controls showed autoantibodies to cytosolic 5'-nucleotidase 1A in 40% of the patients and 3.6% of controls.

INTERPRETATION

Inclusion body myositis is an autoimmune disease with decreased survival rate and with marked sex differences in both prevalence and clinical manifestations. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Myositis-specific Antibodies: Overview and Clinical Utilization

Purpose of review-To review autoantibodies associated with different subtypes of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) and their clinical applications. IIM are a heterogenous group of autoimmune disorders characterized by muscle weakness, cutaneous features, and internal organ involvement. The diagnosis and classification, which is often challenging, is made using a combination of clinical features, muscle enzyme levels, imaging, and biopsy. The landmark discoveries of novel autoantibodies specific to IIM subtypes have been one of the greatest advancements in the field of myositis. The specificity of these autoantibodies has simplified the diagnostic algorithm of IIM with their heterogenous presentation and outdated the earlier diagnostic criteria. Myositis-specific antibodies (MSAs) have improved diagnostics, clinical phenotyping, and prognostic stratification of the subtypes of IIMs. Furthermore, the levels of certain MSAs correlate with disease activity and muscle enzyme levels such that titers may be able to be used to predict disease course and treatment response.

Myositis Antibodies and Interstitial Lung Disease

BACKGROUND

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) comprises a heterogeneous group of inflammatory and fibrotic conditions, often resulting in progressive lung function decline and increased mortality. Connective tissue disease (CTD) should be considered in all patients with ILD, as distinguishing between CTD-ILD and other forms of fibrotic lung disease has important therapeutic and prognostic implications. The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) represent a CTD subtype of growing interest to ILD experts. The expansion and availability of myositis-specific and myositis-associated antibody testing has allowed for improved disease detection and characterization.

CONTENT

In this review, we highlight the relationship between myositis antibodies and ILD. Select forms of IIM, such as the antisynthetase syndrome and clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis can present with rapidly progressive ILD, warranting timely disease diagnosis and management. Disease phenotypes, prevalence, laboratory testing, prognosis, and management strategies are described according to select myositis antibodies.

SUMMARY

Myositis antibodies provide valuable information for clinicians managing patients with ILD. This review aims to increase awareness of their role in disease detection, pathophysiology, and possibly therapeutics.

Inclusion body myositis: correlation of clinical outcomes with histopathology, electromyography and laboratory findings

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether histopathological, electromyographic and laboratory markers correlate with clinical measures in Inclusion Body Myositis (IBM).

METHODS

We reviewed our electronic medical records to identify patients with IBM according to ENMC 2011 criteria, seen between 2015 and 2020. We only included patients who had a muscle biopsy and needle electromyography (EMG) performed on the same muscle (opposite or same side). We used a detailed grading system (0- normal to 4- severe) to score histopathological and EMG findings. Clinical severity was assessed by the modified Rankin scale (mRS), muscle strength sum score (SSS), quadriceps strength and severity of dysphagia on swallow evaluation. Serum markers of interest were creatine kinase level, and cN-1A antibodies.

RESULTS

We included 50 IBM patients, with a median age of 69 years; 64% were males. Median disease duration at diagnosis was 51 months. On muscle biopsy, endomysial inflammation mainly correlated with dysphagia, and inversely correlated with mRS. Vacuoles and congophilic inclusions did not correlate with any of the clinical measures. On EMG, the shortness of motor unit potential (MUP) duration correlated with all clinical measures. Myotonic discharges, and not fibrillation potentials, correlated with the severity of inflammation. Serum markers did not have a statistically-significant correlation with any of the clinical measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Dysphagia was the main clinical feature of IBM correlating with endomysial inflammation. Otherwise, inclusion body myositis clinical measures had limited correlation with histopathological features in this study. The shortness of MUP duration correlated with all clinical measures.

Anti-cN1A Antibodies Are Associated with More Severe Dysphagia in Sporadic Inclusion Body Myositis

In recent years, an autoantibody directed against the 5'-citosolic nucleotidase1A (cN1A) was identified in the sera of sporadic inclusion body myositis (s-IBM) patients with widely variable sensitivity (33%-76%) and specificity (87%-100%). We assessed the sensitivity/specificity of anti-cN1A antibodies in an Italian cohort of s-IBM patients, searching for a potential correlation with clinical data. We collected clinical data and sera from 62 consecutive s-IBM patients and 62 other inflammatory myopathies patients. Testing for anti-cN1A antibodies was performed using a commercial ELISA. Anti-cN1A antibodies were detected in 23 s-IBM patients, resulting in a sensitivity of 37.1% with a specificity of 96.8%. Positive and negative predictive values were 92.0% and 60.6%, respectively. We did not find significant difference regarding demographic variables, nor quadriceps or finger flexor weakness. Nevertheless, we found that anti-cN1A-positive patients presented significantly lower scores in IBMFRS item 1 (swallowing, p = 0.045) and more frequently reported more severe swallowing problems, expressed as an IBMFRS item 1 score ≤ 2 (p < 0.001). We confirmed the low sensitivity and high specificity of anti-cN1A Ab in s-IBM patients with a high positive predictive value. The presence of anti-CN1A antibodies identified patients with a greater risk of more severe dysphagia.

In Pursuit of an Effective Treatment: the Past, Present and Future of Clinical Trials in Inclusion Body Myositis

Purpose of review

No clinical trial in sporadic inclusion body myositis (IBM) thus far has shown a clear and sustained therapeutic effect. We review previous trial methodology, explore why results have not translated into clinical practice, and suggest improvements for future IBM trials.

Recent findings

Early trials primarily assessed immunosuppressive medications, with no significant clinical responses observed. Many of these studies had methodological issues, including small participant numbers, nonspecific diagnostic criteria, short treatment and/or assessment periods and insensitive outcome measures. Most recent IBM trials have instead focused on nonimmunosuppressive therapies, but there is mounting evidence supporting a primary autoimmune aetiology, including the discovery of immunosuppression-resistant clones of cytotoxic T cells and anti-CN-1A autoantibodies which could potentially be used to stratify patients into different cohorts. The latest trials have had mixed results. For example, bimagrumab, a myostatin blocker, did not affect the 6-min timed walk distance, whereas sirolimus, a promotor of autophagy, did. Larger studies are planned to evaluate the efficacy of sirolimus and arimoclomol.

Summary

Thus far, no treatment for IBM has demonstrated a definite therapeutic effect, and effective treatment options in clinical practice are lacking. Trial design and ineffective therapies are likely to have contributed to these failures. Identification of potential therapeutic targets should be followed by future studies using a stratified approach and sensitive and relevant outcome measures.

Clinical utility of anti-cytosolic 5'-nucleotidase 1A antibody in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

Objective

To define the clinicopathologic features and diagnostic utility associated with anti‐cytosolic 5′‐nucleotidase 1A (NT5C1A) antibody seropositivity in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs).

Methods

Anti‐NT5C1A antibody status was clinically tested between 2014 and 2019 in the Washington University neuromuscular clinical laboratory. Using clinicopathologic information available for 593 patients, we classified them as inclusion body myositis (IBM), dermatomyositis, antisynthetase syndrome, immune‐mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM), nonspecific myositis, or noninflammatory muscle diseases.

Results

Of 593 patients, anti‐NT5C1A antibody was found in 159/249 (64%) IBM, 11/53 (21%) dermatomyositis, 7/27 (26%) antisynthetase syndrome, 9/76 (12%) IMNM, 20/84 (24%) nonspecific myositis, and 6/104 (6%) noninflammatory muscle diseases patients. Among patients with IBM, anti‐NT5C1A antibody seropositive patients had more cytochrome oxidase‐negative fibers compared with anti‐NT5C1A antibody seronegative patients. Among 14 IBM patients initially negative for anti‐NT5C1A antibody, three patients (21%) converted to positive. Anti‐NT5C1A antibody seropositivity did not correlate with malignancy, interstitial lung disease, response to treatments in dermatomyositis, antisynthetase syndrome, and IMNM, or survival in IIMs.

Interpretation

Anti‐NT5C1A antibody is associated with IBM. However, the seropositivity can also be seen in non‐IBM IIMs and it does not correlate with any prognostic factors or survival.

Anti-cN1A antibodies do not correlate with specific clinical, electromyographic, or pathological findings in sporadic inclusion body myositis

BACKGROUND

Anti-cytosolic 5'-nucleotidase 1A (cN1A) antibodies are commonly detected in patients with sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM). However, their pathogenic role has not been established. Moreover, efforts toward identifying sIBM distinct clinicopathologic characteristics associated with these antibodies have yielded conflicting results.

METHODS

We first searched for patients, seen in our clinics, tested for anti-cN1A antibodies between December 2015 and December 2019. We identified 92 patients who were diagnosed with sIBM, according to the 2011 ENMC or Griggs et al criteria. Thereafter, we reviewed and compared the clinical and investigational findings of these patients in relation to their antibody status.

RESULTS

Anti-cN1A antibodies were present in 47/92 (51%) patients with sIBM. Comparison of seropositive and seronegative cohorts yielded no significant difference in clinical features, including facial weakness, oropharyngeal and respiratory involvement, or disease severity. The antibody titer did not correlate with the clinical phenotype, CK value, or presence of myotonic discharges on EMG. Anti-cN1A antibody positive patients appeared to have more frequent auto-aggressive inflammation on muscle biopsy but not as an isolated myopathological feature.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that anti-cN1A antibody positive and negative sIBM patients have similar clinical features and disease severity. Anti-cN1A antibodies in our sIBM cohort did not correlate with any studied clinical or laboratory parameter and, therefore, were of limited value in the patient's assessment.

Long‐term strength and functional status in inclusion body myositis and identification of trajectory subgroups

Introduction

Methods

Results

Discussion

See editorial on pages 7–9 in this issue.

Pitfalls in the diagnosis of myositis

The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are a group of heterogeneous autoimmune connective tissue diseases. Despite increase in the understanding of these conditions, securing a timely diagnosis and accurate subtype classification remains difficult in some cases. This has important implications for patients, where delayed or inappropriate treatments can have a negative effect on outcomes. Several conditions can mimic myositis, including metabolic myopathies, genetic myopathies and neurological disease. In addition, the heterogeneity within the idiopathic inflammatory myopathy spectrum can also create diagnostic confusion, referred to here as 'myositis chameleons'. This includes inclusion body myositis, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, hypomyopathic variants of anti-synthetase syndrome and overlap disease. We highlight the importance of a thorough diagnostic workup, refer to updated classification criteria and emphasize the importance of myositis autoantibody testing. Where diagnostic doubt exists, the involvement of a specialist centre and a multidisciplinary team is vital.

New insights into the treatment of myositis

The myositis syndromes include polymyositis, dermatomyositis (DM), necrotizing myopathy, inclusion body myositis (IBM), antisynthetase syndrome and overlap syndromes with myositis. These syndromes mostly occur in middle-aged patients, while juvenile DM occurs in children and adolescents. Patients mostly show a subacute weakness and myalgia in the upper and lower limbs, the diagnosis is based upon these clinical findings in combination with muscle biopsy results and specific serum autoantibodies. In recent years, research achieved a better understanding about the molecular mechanism underlying the myositis syndromes, as well as disease progress and extramuscular organ manifestations, such as interstitial lung disease and association with neoplasias. Treatment mainly consists of glucocorticosteroids and immunosuppressants. IBM is usually refractory to treatments. This review provides an overview of the current standards of treatment and new treatment options like monoclonal antibodies and new molecular therapies and their first results from clinical trials.

Risk factors and disease mechanisms in myositis

Autoimmune diseases develop as a result of chronic inflammation owing to interactions between genes and the environment. However, the mechanisms by which autoimmune diseases evolve remain poorly understood. Newly discovered risk factors and pathogenic processes in the various idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) phenotypes (known collectively as myositis) have illuminated innovative approaches for understanding these diseases. The HLA 8.1 ancestral haplotype is a key risk factor for major IIM phenotypes in some populations, and several genetic variants associated with other autoimmune diseases have been identified as IIM risk factors. Environmental risk factors are less well studied than genetic factors but might include viruses, bacteria, ultraviolet radiation, smoking, occupational and perinatal exposures and a growing list of drugs (including biologic agents) and dietary supplements. Disease mechanisms vary by phenotype, with evidence of shared innate and adaptive immune and metabolic pathways in some phenotypes but unique pathways in others. The heterogeneity and rarity of the IIMs make advancements in diagnosis and treatment cumbersome. Novel approaches, better-defined phenotypes, and international, multidisciplinary consensus have contributed to progress, and it is hoped that these methods will eventually enable therapeutic intervention before the onset or major progression of disease. In the future, preemptive strategies for IIM management might be possible.

Autoantibodies in myositis

The discovery of novel autoantigen systems related to idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (collectively referred to as myositis) in adults and children has had major implications for the diagnosis and management of this group of diseases across a wide range of medical specialties. Traditionally, autoantibodies found in patients with myositis are described as being myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) or myositis-associated autoantibodies (MAAs), depending on their prevalence in other, related conditions. However, certain MSAs are more closely associated with extramuscular manifestations, such as skin and lung disease, than with myositis itself. It is very rare for more than one MSA to coexist in the same individual, underpinning the potential to use MSAs to precisely define genetic and disease endotypes. Each MSA is associated with a distinctive pattern of disease or phenotype, which has implications for diagnosis and a more personalized approach to therapy. Knowledge of the function and localization of the autoantigenic targets for MSAs has provided key insights into the potential immunopathogenic mechanisms of myositis. In particular, evidence suggests that the alteration of expression of a myositis-related autoantigen by certain environmental influences or oncogenesis could be a pivotal event linking autoantibody generation to the development of disease.

Cytokine Profiling of Serum Allows Monitoring of Disease Progression in Inclusion Body Myositis

BACKGROUND

Inclusion body myositis is a late onset inflammatory myopathy lacking reliable serum biomarkers for diagnosis and for disease progression.

OBJECTIVE

To identify diagnostic and predictive biomarkers, cytokine profiling is used to assess the potential of cytokines to discriminate between cases and controls and to assess whether treatment with methotrexate can influence biomarkers associated with disease progression.

METHODS

The diagnostic and follow-up potential of 48 cytokines was tested using Bioplex-assay and ELISA in sera of healthy individuals, IBM patients and patients with other neuromuscular disorders.

RESULTS

Ten cytokines (TRAIL, IL-8, MIF, MCP-1, LIF, IP-10, IFN-α2, MIG, bNGF and IL-3) were identified to be good to excellent markers to discern IBM patients from healthy controls. Three cytokines (IP-10, Eotaxin and SDF1A) changed significantly upon methotrexate treatment as compared with the natural clinical course. Muscle strength loss was associated with changes in IL-8 and SDF1A levels. IFN-γ levels were only associated with survival of IBM patients before correction for multiple comparisons.

DISCUSSION

Cytokine profiling can discriminate IBM patients from healthy controls and other neuromuscular disorders. Immunosuppression with methotrexate affects cytokine levels in IBM. IL-8 and SDF1A could serve as biomarkers for disease progression.

Disease Specific Autoantibodies in Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies represent still a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in different disciplines including neurology, rheumatology, and dermatology. In recent years, the spectrum of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies has been significantly extended and the different manifestations were described in more detail leading to new classification criteria. A major breakthrough has also occurred with respect to new biomarkers especially with the characterization of new autoantibody-antigen systems, which can be separated in myositis specific antibodies and myositis associated antibodies. These markers are detectable in approximately 80% of patients and facilitate not only the diagnostic procedures, but provide also important information on stratification of patients with respect to organ involvement, risk of cancer and overall prognosis of disease. Therefore, it is not only of importance to know the significance of these markers and to be familiar with the optimal diagnostic tests, but also with potential limitations in detection. This article focuses mainly on antibodies which are specific for myositis providing an overview on the targeted antigens, the available detection procedures and clinical association. As major tasks for the near future, the need of an international standardization is discussed for detection methods of autoantibodies in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Furthermore, additional investigations are required to improve stratification of patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies according to their antibody profile with respect to response to different treatment options.

Classification and management of adult inflammatory myopathies

Inflammatory myopathies, collectively known as myositis, are heterogeneous disorders characterised by muscle inflammation, and frequently accompanied by extramuscular manifestations that affect the skin, lung, and joints. Patients with inflammatory myopathies were previously classified as having dermatomyositis if characteristic rashes accompanied the muscle involvement, and as having polymyositis if no rashes were present. Five main types of inflammatory myopathies are now widely recognised: dermatomyositis, immune-mediated necrotising myopathy, sporadic inclusion-body myositis, overlap myositis (including antisynthetase syndrome), and polymyositis. The discovery of autoantibodies that are specifically associated with characteristic clinical phenotypes has been instrumental to the understanding of inflammatory myopathies. Treatment is still largely based on expert opinion, but several studies have shown effectiveness of different therapies in various subsets of inflammatory myopathies. These advances will undoubtedly improve the outcomes of patients with inflammatory myopathies.

Anti-NT5c1A Autoantibodies as Biomarkers in Inclusion Body Myositis

Objective: Sporadic Inclusion Body Myositis (sIBM) is an inflammatory myopathy (IIM) without a specific diagnostic biomarker until autoantibodies to the cytosolic 5′-nucleotidase 1A (NT5c1A/Mup44) were reported. The objectives of our study were to determine the sensitivity and specificity of anti-NT5c1A for sIBM, demonstrate demographic, clinical and serological predictors for anti-NT5c1A positivity and determine if anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) staining on HEp-2 cells is a reliable screening method for anti-NT5c1A.

Methods: Sera from sIBM patients and controls were stored at −80°C until required for analysis. IgG antibodies to NT5c1A were detected by an addressable laser bead immunoassay (ALBIA) using a full-length human recombinant protein. Autoantibodies to other autoimmune myopathy antigens (Jo-1, OJ, TIF1y, PL-12, SAE, EJ, MDA5, PL7, SRP, NXP2, MI-2) were detected by line immunoassay (LIA), chemiluminescence immunoassay (CIA) or enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and ANA detected by IIF on HEp-2 substrate. Demographic, clinical and serological data were obtained by chart review.

Results: Forty-three patients with sIBM, 537 disease control patients with other autoimmune, degenerative and neuromuscular diseases, and 78 healthy controls were included. 48.8% (21/43) of sIBM patients were positive for anti-NT5c1A. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of anti-NT5c1A for sIBM were 0.49, 0.92, 0.29, and 0.96, respectively. Compared to sIBM, the frequency of anti-NT5c1A was lower in both the disease control group (8.8%, OR 0.10 [95%CI: 0.05–0.20], p < 0.0001) and in the apparently healthy control group (5.1%, OR 0.06 [95%CI: 0.02–0.18], p < 0.0001). In the univariable analysis, sIBM patients with more severe muscle weakness were more likely to be anti-NT5c1A positive (OR 4.10 [95% CI: 1.17, 14.33], p = 0.027), although this was not statistically significant (adjusted OR 4.30 [95% CI: 0.89, 20.76], p = 0.069) in the multivariable analysis. The ANA of sIBM sera did not demonstrate a consistent IIF pattern associated with anti-NT5c1A.

Conclusions: Anti-NT5c1A has moderate sensitivity and high specificity for sIBM using ALBIA. The presence of anti-NT5c1A antibodies may be associated with muscle weakness. Anti-NT5c1A antibodies were not associated with a specific IIF staining pattern, hence screening using HEp-2 substrate is unlikely to be a useful predictor for presence of these autoantibodies.

Muscle fiber dysfunction contributes to weakness in inclusion body myositis

Atrophy and fatty infiltration are important causes of muscle weakness in inclusion body myositis (IBM). Muscle weakness can also be caused by reduced specific force; i.e. the amount of force generated per unit of residual muscle tissue. This study investigates in vivo specific force of the quadriceps and ex vivo specific force of single muscle fibers in patients with IBM. We included 8 participants with IBM and 12 healthy controls, who all underwent quantitative muscle testing, quantitative MRI of the quadriceps and paired muscle biopsies of the quadriceps and tibialis anterior. Single muscle fibers were isolated to measure muscle fiber specific force and contractile properties. Both in vivo quadriceps specific force and ex vivo muscle fiber specific force were reduced. Muscle fiber dysfunction was accompanied by reduced active stiffness, which reflects a decrease in the number of attached actin-myosin cross-bridges during activation. Myosin concentration was reduced in IBM fibers. Because reduced specific force contributes to muscle weakness in patients with IBM, therapeutic strategies that augment muscle fiber strength may provide benefit to patients with IBM.

Autoantibody testing in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

The diagnosis and classification of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are based mainly on clinical and histological features. The discovery of myositis-specific and myositis-associated antibodies has simplified the (sub)classification of inflammatory myopathies. Patients suspected of having an idiopathic inflammatory myopathy should undergo routine antibody testing to gain more insight into distinct phenotypes, comorbidities, treatment response and prognosis. Furthermore, autoantibody testing can help in patients with atypical patterns of weakness or with an unresolved limb-girdle myopathic phenotype, or interstitial lung disease. However, some important technical and methodological issues can hamper the interpretation of antibody testing; for example, some antibodies are not included in the widely available line blots. We aim to provide a practical review of the use of autoantibody testing in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies in clinical practice.

Recent Advances in Research Regarding Autoantibodies in Connective Tissue Diseases and Related Disorders

Connective tissue diseases (CTDs), also known as systemic autoimmune diseases, involve a variety of autoantibodies against cellular components. An important factor regarding these autoantibodies is that each antibody is exclusively related to a certain clinical feature of the disease type, which may prove useful in clinical practice. Thus far, more than 100 types of autoantibodies have been found in CTDs, and most of their target antigens have been identified. Many of these autoantigens are enzymes or regulators involved in important cellular functions, such as gene replication, transcription, repair/recombination, RNA processing, and protein synthesis, as well as proteins that form complexes with RNA and DNA. This article reviews the autoantibodies for each CTD, along with an assessment of their clinical significance, and provides suggestions regarding their utilization for clinical practice.

Inclusion Body Myositis: Update on Pathogenesis and Treatment

Inclusion body myositis is the most common acquired myopathy after the age of 50. It is characterized by progressive asymmetric weakness predominantly affecting the quadriceps and/or finger flexors. Loss of ambulation and dysphagia are major complications of the disease. Inclusion body myositis can be associated with cytosolic 5'-nucleotidase 1A antibodies. Muscle biopsy usually shows inflammatory cells surrounding and invading non-necrotic muscle fibers, rimmed vacuoles, congophilic inclusions, and protein aggregates. Disease pathogenesis remains poorly understood and consists of an interplay between inflammatory and degenerative pathways. Antigen-driven, clonally restricted, cytotoxic T cells represent a main feature of the inflammatory component, whereas abnormal protein homeostasis with protein misfolding, aggregation, and dysfunctional protein disposal is the hallmark of the degenerative component. Inclusion body myositis remains refractory to treatment. Better understanding of the disease pathogenesis led to the identification of novel therapeutic targets, addressing both the inflammatory and degenerative pathways.

Advances in the early diagnosis and therapy of inclusion body myositis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe recent advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to inclusion body myositis (IBM).

RECENT FINDINGS

Our understanding of the implications of anti-cytosolic 5'-nucleotidase 1A autoantibody status in IBM and other diseases is increasing. Muscle imaging using magnetic resonance techniques and ultrasound is increasingly being performed and characteristic patterns of muscle involvement may help with diagnosis. Longitudinal imaging studies are likely to help with monitoring and as an outcome measure in clinical trials. Recent small-scale studies of Arimoclomol and Rapamycin have shown promising results and further investigation of these medications is ongoing. Exercise is likely to form an increasingly important facet of management of patients with IBM, but the optimal type of exercise programme to enrol patients in is not yet determined.

SUMMARY

Antibody testing and muscle imaging results may improve our ability to diagnose IBM and the availability of effective disease modifying treatments targeting novel non-inflammatory pathways could soon become a reality. It remains the duty of those involved in the management of patients with IBM to facilitate involvement in clinical trials and other research studies.

Sensitivity and clinical utility of the anti-cytosolic 5'-nucleotidase 1A (cN1A) antibody test in sporadic inclusion body myositis: Report of 40 patients from a single neuromuscular center

Sporadic inclusion body myositis (IBM) is the most common acquired myopathy affecting patients over age 50. The discovery of an autoantibody directed against a 43-44 kD protein (anti-cytosolic-5'-nucleotidase 1A or anti-cN1A) has provided support for the hypothesis of an immune-mediated pathogenesis. Previous studies have reported variable test sensitivity and specificity, and inconsistent results on the predictive value. In our cohort of 40 patients with clinico-pathologically or clinically defined IBM, we found the sensitivity of the anti-cN1A antibody test to be 50%. Comparing characteristics for test positive and test negative groups, we found that patients in our cohort testing positive for the anti-cN1A antibody were significantly more likely to be older than age 60 years at symptom onset. We found no positive association between anti-cN1A reactivity and other clinical, laboratory, and muscle histopathologic findings. Based on all clinical studies published to date including the present, the anti-cN1A antibody test shows high diagnostic specificity, moderate sensitivity, and a low predictive value in regards to age of onset, disease severity and other associated clinicopathological findings.

Autoantibodies to Cytosolic 5'-Nucleotidase 1A in Primary Sjögren's Syndrome and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Introduction

Autoantibodies to cytosolic 5′-nucleotidase 1A (cN-1A; NT5C1A) have a high specificity when differentiating sporadic inclusion body myositis from polymyositis and dermatomyositis. In primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) anti-cN-1A autoantibodies can be detected as well. However, various frequencies of anti-cN-1A reactivity have been reported in SLE and pSS, which may at least in part be explained by the different assays used. Here, we determined the occurrence of anti-cN-1A reactivity in a large number of patients with pSS and SLE using one standardized ELISA.

Methods

Sera from pSS (n = 193) and SLE patients (n = 252) were collected in five European centers. Anti-cN-1A, anti-Ro52, anti-nucleosome, and anti-dsDNA reactivities were tested by ELISA (Euroimmun AG) in a single laboratory. Correlations of anti-cN-1A reactivity with demographic data and clinical data (duration of disease at the moment of serum sampling, autoimmune comorbidity and presence of muscular symptoms) were analyzed using SPSS software.

Results

Anti-cN-1A autoantibodies were found on average in 12% of pSS patients, with varying frequencies among the different cohorts (range: 7–19%). In SLE patients, the anti-cN-1A positivity on average was 10% (range: 6–21%). No relationship was found between anti-cN-1A reactivity and the presence or absence of anti-Ro52, anti-nucleosome, and anti-dsDNA reactivity in both pSS and SLE. No relationship between anti-cN-1A reactivity and duration of disease at the moment of serum sampling and the duration of serum storage was observed. The frequency of muscular symptoms or viral infections did not differ between anti-cN-1A-positive and -negative patients. In both disease groups anti-cN-1A-positive patients suffered more often from other autoimmune diseases than the anti-cN-1A-negative patients (15 versus 5% (p = 0.05) in pSS and 50 versus 30% (p = 0.02) in SLE).

Conclusion

Our results confirm the relatively frequent occurrence of anti-cN-1A in pSS and SLE patients and the variation in anti-cN-1A reactivity between independent groups of these patients. The explanation for this variation remains elusive. The correlation between anti-cN-1A reactivity and polyautoimmunity should be evaluated in future studies. We conclude that anti-cN-1A should be classified as a myositis-associated-, not as a myositis-specific-autoantibody based on its frequent presence in SLE and pSS.

Current Classification and Management of Inflammatory Myopathies

Inflammatory disorders of the skeletal muscle include polymyositis (PM), dermatomyositis (DM), (immune mediated) necrotizing myopathy (NM), overlap syndrome with myositis (overlap myositis, OM) including anti-synthetase syndrome (ASS), and inclusion body myositis (IBM). Whereas DM occurs in children and adults, all other forms of myositis mostly develop in middle aged individuals. Apart from a slowly progressive, chronic disease course in IBM, patients with myositis typically present with a subacute onset of weakness of arms and legs, often associated with pain and clearly elevated creatine kinase in the serum. PM, DM and most patients with NM and OM usually respond to immunosuppressive therapy, whereas IBM is largely refractory to treatment. The diagnosis of myositis requires careful and combinatorial assessment of (1) clinical symptoms including pattern of weakness and paraclinical tests such as MRI of the muscle and electromyography (EMG), (2) broad analysis of auto-antibodies associated with myositis, and (3) detailed histopathological work-up of a skeletal muscle biopsy. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current classification, diagnostic pathway, treatment regimen and pathomechanistic understanding of myositis.

Bench to bedside review of myositis autoantibodies

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies represent a heterogeneous group of autoimmune diseases with systemic involvement. Even though numerous specific autoantibodies have been recognized, they have not been included, with the only exception of anti-Jo-1, into the 2017 Classification Criteria, thus perpetuating a clinical-serologic gap. The lack of homogeneous grouping based on the antibody profile deeply impacts the diagnostic approach, therapeutic choices and prognostic stratification of these patients. This review is intended to highlight the comprehensive scenario regarding myositis-related autoantibodies, from the molecular characterization and biological significance to target antigens, from the detection tools, with a special focus on immunofluorescence patterns on HEp-2 cells, to their relative prevalence and ethnic diversity, from the clinical presentation to prognosis. If, on the one hand, a notable body of literature is present, on the other data are fragmented, retrospectively based and collected from small case series, so that they do not sufficiently support the decision-making process (i.e. therapeutic approach) into the clinics.

Anti-NT5C1A autoantibodies are associated with more severe disease in patients with juvenile myositis

OBJECTIVES

Autoantibodies recognising cytosolic 5'-nucleotidase 1A (NT5C1A) are found in adult patients with myositis and other autoimmune diseases. They are especially prevalent in adults with inclusion body myositis (IBM), in which they are associated with more severe weakness and higher mortality. This study was undertaken to define the prevalence and clinical features associated with anti-NT5C1A autoantibodies in juvenile myositis.

METHODS

We screened sera from 380 patients with juvenile myositis, 30 patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and 92 healthy control children for anti-NT5C1A autoantibodies. Clinical characteristics were compared between patients with myositis with and without anti-NT5C1A autoantibodies.

RESULTS

Anti-NT5C1A autoantibodies were present in 102 of 380 (27%) patients with juvenile myositis and in 11 of 92 (12%) healthy control children (P=0.002) and 27% of children with JIA (P=0.05 vs controls). Sera of 83 of 307 (27%) patients with juvenile dermatomyositis and 16 of 46 (35%) patients with juvenile overlap myositis were anti-NT5C1A autoantibody-positive (P<0.01 vs healthy controls for each), but sera of only 3 of 27 (11%) patients with juvenile polymyositis were anti-NT5C1A-positive. Patients with juvenile myositis with and without anti-NT5C1A autoantibodies had similar clinical phenotypes. However, patients with anti-NT5C1A autoantibody-positive myositis had greater pulmonary symptoms at diagnosis (P=0.005), more frequent hospitalisations (P=0.01) and required a larger number of medications (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Anti-NT5C1A autoantibodies are present in more than one-quarter of children with juvenile myositis and JIA compared with only 12% of healthy children, suggesting they are myositis-associated in children. As in adults with IBM, patients with juvenile myositis with anti-NT5C1A autoantibodies have more severe disease.