Leukocyte Telomere Length and Its Interaction with Germline Variation in Telomere-Related Genes in Relation to Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Risk

Understanding, diagnosing, and treating pancreatic cancer from the perspective of telomeres and telomerase

Telomerase is associated with cellular aging, and its presence limits cellular lifespan. Telomerase by preventing telomere shortening can extend the number of cell divisions for cancer cells. In adult pancreatic cells, telomeres gradually shorten, while in precancerous lesions of cancer, telomeres in cells are usually significantly shortened. At this time, telomerase is still in an inactive state, and it is not until before and after the onset of cancer that telomerase is reactivated, causing cancer cells to proliferate. Methylation of the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter and regulation of telomerase by lactate dehydrogenase B (LDHB) is the mechanism of telomerase reactivation in pancreatic cancer. Understanding the role of telomeres and telomerase in pancreatic cancer will help to diagnose and initiate targeted therapy as early as possible. This article reviews the role of telomeres and telomerase as biomarkers in the development of pancreatic cancer and the progress of research on telomeres and telomerase as targets for therapeutic intervention.

Role of telomere length in human carcinogenesis (Review)

Cancer is considered the most important clinical, social and economic issue regarding cause‑specific disability‑adjusted life years among all human pathologies. Exogenous, endogenous and individual factors, including genetic predisposition, participate in cancer triggering. Telomeres are specific DNA structures positioned at the end of chromosomes and consist of repetitive nucleotide sequences, which, together with shelterin proteins, facilitate the maintenance of chromosome stability, while protecting them from genomic erosion. Even though the connection between telomere status and carcinogenesis has been identified, the absence of a universal or even a cancer‑specific trend renders consent even more complex. It is indicative that both short and long telomere lengths have been associated with a high risk of cancer incidence. When evaluating risk associations between cancer and telomere length, a disparity appears to emerge. Even though shorter telomeres have been adopted as a marker of poorer health status and an older biological age, longer telomeres due to increased cell growth potential are associated with the acquirement of cancer‑initiating somatic mutations. Therefore, the present review aimed to comprehensively present the multifaceted pattern of telomere length and cancer incidence association.

ACPY2 gene polymorphisms on cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To provide a comprehensive account of the association of ACYP2 gene polymorphisms with susceptibility to cancer. A literature search for eligible candidate gene studies published before April 20, 2022 was conducted in the PubMed, Medline and Web of Science. The following combinations of main keywords were used: (ACYP2 OR acylphosphatase 2) AND (polymorphism OR mutation OR variation OR SNP OR genotype) AND (cancer OR tumor OR neoplasm OR malignancy OR carcinoma OR adenocarcinoma). Potential sources of heterogeneity were sought out via subgroup and sensitivity analysis. Publication bias were also estimated. Overall, a total of 10 articles with 5,230 cases and 5,086 controls for thirteen polymorphisms of ACYP2 gene were enrolled. We found that ACYP2 rs11125529, rs11896604, rs12615793, rs17045754, rs6713088, rs843645, rs843706, rs843711 and rs843752 were correlated with an increased risk of cancer. However, we found that ACYP2 rs12621038 might have less susceptibility to cancer. While for other polymorphisms, the results showed no significant association with cancer risk. ACYP2 rs11125529, rs11896604, rs12615793, rs17045754, rs6713088, rs843645, rs843706, rs843711 and rs843752 are associated with cancer risk. ACYP2 rs12621038 polymorphism is inversely associated with cancer risk.

Influence of Cancer Susceptibility Gene Mutations and ABO Blood Group of Pancreatic Cancer Probands on Concomitant Risk to First-Degree Relatives

BACKGROUND

ABO blood group is associated with pancreatic cancer risk. Whether ABO blood group alone or when combined with inherited mutation status of index pancreatic cancer cases (probands) can enhance pancreatic cancer risk estimation in first-degree relatives (FDR) is unclear. We examined FDRs' risk for pancreatic cancer based on probands' ABO blood group and probands' cancer susceptibility gene mutation status.

METHODS

Data on 23,739 FDRs, identified through 3,268 pancreatic cancer probands, were analyzed. Probands' ABO blood groups were determined serologically or genetically, and 20 cancer susceptibility genes were used to classify probands as "mutation-positive" or "mutation-negative." SIRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated, comparing observed pancreatic cancer cases in the FDRs with the number expected in SEER-21 (reference population).

RESULTS

Overall, FDRs had 2-fold risk of pancreatic cancer (SIR = 2.00; 95% CI = 1.79-2.22). Pancreatic cancer risk was higher in FDRs of mutation-positive (SIR = 3.80; 95% CI = 2.81-5.02) than mutation-negative (SIR = 1.79; 95% CI = 1.57-2.04) probands (P < 0.001). The magnitude of risk did not differ by ABO blood group alone (SIR_{blood-group-O} = 1.57; 95% CI = 1.20-2.03, SIR_non-O = 1.83; 95% CI = 1.53-2.17; P = 0.33). Among FDRs of probands with non-O blood group, pancreatic cancer risk was higher in FDRs of mutation-positive (SIR = 3.98; 95% CI = 2.62-5.80) than mutation-negative (SIR = 1.66; 95% CI = 1.35-2.03) probands (P < 0.001), but risk magnitudes were statistically similar when probands had blood group O (SIR_{mutation-positive} = 2.65; 95% CI = 1.09-5.47, SIR_{mutation-negative} = 1.48; 95% CI = 1.06-5.47; P = 0.16).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a range of pancreatic cancer risk to FDRs according to probands' germline mutation status and ABO blood group, ranging from 1.48 for FDRs of probands with blood group O and mutation-negative to 3.98 for FDRs of probands with non-O blood group and mutation-positive.

IMPACT

Combined ABO blood group and germline mutation status of probands can inform pancreatic cancer risk estimation in FDRs.

Shorter Treatment-Naïve Leukocyte Telomere Length is Associated with Poorer Overall Survival of Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Critically shortened telomeres contribute to chromosomal instability and neoplastic transformation and are associated with early death of patients with certain cancer types. Shorter leukocyte telomere length (LTL) has been associated with higher risk for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and might be associated also with survival of patients with PDAC. We investigated the association between treatment-naïve LTL and overall survival of patients with incident PDAC.

METHODS

The study included 642 consecutively enrolled PDAC patients in the Mayo Clinic Biospecimen Resource for Pancreas Research. Blood samples were obtained at the time of diagnosis, before the start of cancer treatment, from which LTL was assayed by qRT-PCR. LTL was first modeled as a continuous variable (per-interquartile range decrease in LTL) and then as a categorized variable (short, medium, long). Multivariable-adjusted HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for overall mortality using Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Shorter treatment-naïve LTL was associated with higher mortality among patients with PDAC (HR_continuous = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.01-1.28, P = 0.03; HR_{shortest vs. longest LTL} = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.05-1.59, P _trend = 0.01). There was a difference in the association between LTL and overall mortality by tumor stage at diagnosis; resectable tumors (HR_continuous = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.73-1.12), locally advanced tumors (HR_continuous = 1.29; 95% CI: 1.07-1.56), and metastatic tumors (HR_continuous = 1.17; 95% CI: 0.96-1.42), P _interaction = 0.04.

CONCLUSION

Shorter treatment-naïve LTL is associated with poorer overall survival of patients with incident PDAC.

IMPACT

Peripheral blood LTL might be a prognostic marker for PDAC.