1
|
Jodal HC, Akwiwu EU, Lemmens M, Delis-van Diemen PM, Klotz D, Leon LG, Lakbir S, de Wit M, Fijneman RJ, van Leerdam ME, Dekker E, Spaander MC, Meijer GA, Løberg M, Coupé VM, Kalager M, Carvalho B. Risk Prediction of Metachronous Colorectal Cancer from Molecular Features of Adenomas: A Nested Case-Control Study. Cancer Res Commun 2023; 3:2292-2301. [PMID: 37921412 PMCID: PMC10642372 DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.crc-23-0186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
Current morphologic features defining advanced adenomas (size ≥10 mm, high-grade dysplasia or ≥25% villous component) cannot optimally distinguish individuals at high risk or low risk of metachronous colorectal cancer (me-CRC), which may result in suboptimal surveillance. Certain DNA copy-number alterations (CNAs) are associated with adenoma-to-carcinoma progression. We aimed to evaluate whether these molecular features can better predict an individual's risk of me-CRC than the morphologic advanced adenoma features.In this nested case-control study, 529 individuals with a single adenoma at first colonoscopy were selected from a Norwegian adenoma cohort. DNA copy-number profiles were determined, by low-coverage whole-genome sequencing. Prevalence of CNAs in advanced and non-advanced adenomas and its association (OR) with me-CRC was assessed. For the latter, cases (with me-CRC) were matched to controls (without me-CRC) on follow-up, age and sex.CNAs associated with adenoma-to-carcinoma progression were observed in 85/267 (32%) of advanced adenomas and in 27/262 (10%) of non-advanced adenomas. me-CRC was statistically significantly associated, also after adjustment for other variables, with age at baseline [OR, 1.14; 95% confidence interval CI), 1.03-1.26; P = 0.012], advanced adenomas (OR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.50-4.01; P < 0.001) and with the presence of ≥3 DNA copy-number losses (OR, 1.90; 95% CI. 1.02-3.54; P = 0.043).Molecularly-defined high-risk adenomas were associated with me-CRC, but the association of advanced adenoma with me-CRC was stronger. SIGNIFICANCE Identifying new biomarkers may improve prediction of me-CRC for individuals with adenomas and optimize surveillance intervals to reduce risk of colorectal cancer and reduce oversurveillance of patients with low risk of colorectal cancer. Use of DNA CNAs alone does not improve prediction of me-CRC. Further research to improve risk classification is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henriette C. Jodal
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Section of Oncology, Drammen Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway
| | - Eddymurphy U. Akwiwu
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Group, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Margriet Lemmens
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Dagmar Klotz
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Leticia G. Leon
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Soufyan Lakbir
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Bioinformatics Group, Department of Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Meike de Wit
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Remond J.A. Fijneman
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Monique E. van Leerdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Manon C.W. Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gerrit A. Meijer
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Magnus Løberg
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Veerle M.H. Coupé
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Group, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mette Kalager
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Beatriz Carvalho
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Erol Fenercioğlu Ö, Beyhan E, Şahin R, Baloğlu MC, Arslan E, Çermik TF, Ergül N. The potential role of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT for screening malignancy in suspected colonic lesions. Nucl Med Commun 2023; 44:896-899. [PMID: 37450605 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
AIM Benign colonic lesions like tubular adenoma may show intense uptake on F-18-FDG PET/CT and can be mistaken for malignancy. In this study, we evaluated the role of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT for discriminating the benign and malignant colonic lesions. METHODS Forty patients with diagnosis of colorectal cancer who had undergone 18F-FDG-PET/CT and 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT for initial staging were retrospectively analyzed. The unexpected foci of uptake in colon on 18F-FDG PET/CT were compared with 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT with lesion and background SUVmax. RESULTS The primary colorectal lesion SUVmax on both PET/CTs was similar. A total of 9 incidental colon lesions in 7 patients were detected showing intense 18F-FDG uptake and no 68Ga-FAPI-04 uptake. All of the lesions were consistent with tubular adenoma histopathologically. CONCLUSION 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT may have a crucial role for discrimination of benign and malignant colonic lesions and avoid the unnecessary interventions and extended surgeries in patients with colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Özge Erol Fenercioğlu
- Clinic of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bresalier RS, Senore C, Young GP, Allison J, Benamouzig R, Benton S, Bossuyt PMM, Caro L, Carvalho B, Chiu HM, Coupé VMH, de Klaver W, de Klerk CM, Dekker E, Dolwani S, Fraser CG, Grady W, Guittet L, Gupta S, Halloran SP, Haug U, Hoff G, Itzkowitz S, Kortlever T, Koulaouzidis A, Ladabaum U, Lauby-Secretan B, Leja M, Levin B, Levin TR, Macrae F, Meijer GA, Melson J, O'Morain C, Parry S, Rabeneck L, Ransohoff DF, Sáenz R, Saito H, Sanduleanu-Dascalescu S, Schoen RE, Selby K, Singh H, Steele RJC, Sung JJY, Symonds EL, Winawer SJ. An efficient strategy for evaluating new non-invasive screening tests for colorectal cancer: the guiding principles. Gut 2023; 72:1904-1918. [PMID: 37463757 PMCID: PMC10511996 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-329701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE New screening tests for colorectal cancer (CRC) are rapidly emerging. Conducting trials with mortality reduction as the end point supporting their adoption is challenging. We re-examined the principles underlying evaluation of new non-invasive tests in view of technological developments and identification of new biomarkers. DESIGN A formal consensus approach involving a multidisciplinary expert panel revised eight previously established principles. RESULTS Twelve newly stated principles emerged. Effectiveness of a new test can be evaluated by comparison with a proven comparator non-invasive test. The faecal immunochemical test is now considered the appropriate comparator, while colonoscopy remains the diagnostic standard. For a new test to be able to meet differing screening goals and regulatory requirements, flexibility to adjust its positivity threshold is desirable. A rigorous and efficient four-phased approach is proposed, commencing with small studies assessing the test's ability to discriminate between CRC and non-cancer states (phase I), followed by prospective estimation of accuracy across the continuum of neoplastic lesions in neoplasia-enriched populations (phase II). If these show promise, a provisional test positivity threshold is set before evaluation in typical screening populations. Phase III prospective studies determine single round intention-to-screen programme outcomes and confirm the test positivity threshold. Phase IV studies involve evaluation over repeated screening rounds with monitoring for missed lesions. Phases III and IV findings will provide the real-world data required to model test impact on CRC mortality and incidence. CONCLUSION New non-invasive tests can be efficiently evaluated by a rigorous phased comparative approach, generating data from unbiased populations that inform predictions of their health impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert S Bresalier
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Carlo Senore
- Epidemiology and screening unit, Centro di Riferimento per l'Epidemiologia e la Prevenzione Oncologica in Piemonte, Turin, Italy
| | - Graeme P Young
- Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - James Allison
- Internal Medicine/Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Robert Benamouzig
- Gastroenterology & Digestive Oncology Department, Hôpital Avicenne University Paris Nord La Sorbonne, Bobigny, France
| | - Sally Benton
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry and NHS Bowel Cancer Screening South of England Hub, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | - Patrick M M Bossuyt
- Department of Epidemiology & Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luis Caro
- Carrera de especialista de Endoscopia Digestiva, Institución GEDYT (Gastroenterologia diagnostico y terapéutica), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Beatriz Carvalho
- Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Han-Mo Chiu
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Veerle M H Coupé
- Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Willemijn de Klaver
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Clasine Maria de Klerk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology C2-310, Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology C2-115, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Duivendrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sunil Dolwani
- Dept of Gastroenterology, Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
| | - Callum G Fraser
- Centre for Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening, University of Dundee School of Medicine, Dundee, UK
| | - William Grady
- Division of Translational Science and Therapeutics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Lydia Guittet
- ERI3 Cancers & Populations, Normandie University, UNICAEN, Caen, France
| | - Samir Gupta
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | - Ulrike Haug
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology, Bremen, Germany
| | - Geir Hoff
- Department of Research, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway
- Department of CRC screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Steven Itzkowitz
- Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Tim Kortlever
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Duivendrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Uri Ladabaum
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Beatrice Lauby-Secretan
- Section of Evidence Synthesis and Classification, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Mārcis Leja
- Institute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
| | - Bernard Levin
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Finlay Macrae
- Colorectal Medicine and Genetics, The University of Melbourne Department of Medicine Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Gerrit A Meijer
- Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joshua Melson
- High-Risk Clinic for Gastrointestinal Cancers, University of Arizona Cancer Center Division of Gastroenterology, Banner University, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Colm O'Morain
- Gastroenterology, Trinity College Dublin Faculty of Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Susan Parry
- National Bowel Screening Programme, National Screening Unit, Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of Medicine, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Linda Rabeneck
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David F Ransohoff
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Roque Sáenz
- Clínica Alemana de Santiago, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago de Chile, Chile
| | - Hiroshi Saito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Aomori Prefectural Central Hospital, Aomori, Japan
| | | | - Robert E Schoen
- Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kevin Selby
- Department of ambulatory Care, Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Harminder Singh
- Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba Max Rady College of Medicine, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | | | - Joseph J Y Sung
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Erin Leigh Symonds
- Department of Gastroenterology, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Sidney J Winawer
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Debattista J, Grech L, Scerri C, Grech G. Copy Number Variations as Determinants of Colorectal Tumor Progression in Liquid Biopsies. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24. [PMID: 36675253 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24021738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the years, increasing evidence has shown that copy number variations (CNVs) play an important role in the pathogenesis and prognosis of Colorectal Cancer (CRC). Colorectal adenomas are highly prevalent lesions, but only 5% of these adenomas ever progress to carcinoma. This review summarizes the different CNVs associated with adenoma-carcinoma CRC progression and with CRC staging. Characterization of CNVs in circulating free-RNA and in blood-derived exosomes augers well with the potential of using such assays for patient management and early detection of metastasis. To overcome the limitations related to tissue biopsies and tumor heterogeneity, using CNVs to characterize tumor-derived materials in biofluids provides less invasive sampling methods and a sample that collectively represents multiple tumor sites in heterogeneous samples. Liquid biopsies provide a source of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs), tumor-derived exosomes (TDE), circulating free RNA, and non-coding RNA. This review provides an overview of the current diagnostic and predictive models from liquid biopsies.
Collapse
|
5
|
Akwiwu EU, Klausch T, Jodal HC, Carvalho B, Løberg M, Kalager M, Berkhof J, H. Coupé VM. A progressive three-state model to estimate time to cancer: a likelihood-based approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 2022; 22:179. [PMID: 35761181 PMCID: PMC9235269 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-022-01645-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To optimize colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and surveillance, information regarding the time-dependent risk of advanced adenomas (AA) to develop into CRC is crucial. However, since AA are removed after diagnosis, the time from AA to CRC cannot be observed in an ethically acceptable manner. We propose a statistical method to indirectly infer this time in a progressive three-state disease model using surveillance data. Methods Sixteen models were specified, with and without covariates. Parameters of the parametric time-to-event distributions from the adenoma-free state (AF) to AA and from AA to CRC were estimated simultaneously, by maximizing the likelihood function. Model performance was assessed via simulation. The methodology was applied to a random sample of 878 individuals from a Norwegian adenoma cohort. Results Estimates of the parameters of the time distributions are consistent and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) have good coverage. For the Norwegian sample (AF: 78%, AA: 20%, CRC: 2%), a Weibull model for both transition times was selected as the final model based on information criteria. The mean time among those who have made the transition to CRC since AA onset within 50 years was estimated to be 4.80 years (95% CI: 0; 7.61). The 5-year and 10-year cumulative incidence of CRC from AA was 13.8% (95% CI: 7.8%;23.8%) and 15.4% (95% CI: 8.2%;34.0%), respectively. Conclusions The time-dependent risk from AA to CRC is crucial to explain differences in the outcomes of microsimulation models used for the optimization of CRC prevention. Our method allows for improving models by the inclusion of data-driven time distributions. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at (10.1186/s12874-022-01645-2).
Collapse
|
6
|
Gillmann C, Pajor G, Ramadori P, Albers P, Mons U, Steindorf K, Kentner S, Baumann M. Solving problems is smart, preventing them is wise: Lessons learned from the 2nd International DKFZ Conference on Cancer Prevention. Int J Cancer 2021; 148:3086-3096. [PMID: 33544875 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
The 2nd International DKFZ Conference on Cancer Prevention (CCP2020) organized by the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) was held as a virtual event on 17-18 September 2020. The event gathered experts on cancer prevention from around the world with the aim of generating a stimulating interchange of opinions between clinicians and basic researchers working in the field. The talks and posters of the conference fueled exciting discussions and debates about the state of the art of cancer prevention and provided a comprehensive outlook on the many aspects of the field. The program was divided into three main sessions, illustrating the most recent methodological approaches and interventions in primary, secondary and tertiary prevention, enriched by introductory lectures depicting the most relevant aspects of each session. The key concepts covered in this meeting were risk factors, early detection, improving life after cancer, cancer prevention in Europe and personalized prevention. The importance of the latter was expressly highlighted, many presentations emphasizing that in the era of personalized medicine, prevention also needs to be based on the unique genetic, epigenetic, social and behavioral characteristics of the individual to achieve maximal efficacy. In this article, we summarize the key messages emerging from each section, with particular attention on the most important challenges yet to be met in the field of cancer prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clarissa Gillmann
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gabor Pajor
- Department of Molecular Hematology/Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pierluigi Ramadori
- Division of Chronic inflammation and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Albers
- Department of Urology, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.,Division of Personalized Prevention of Prostate Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ute Mons
- Cancer Prevention Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heart Center, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Karen Steindorf
- Division of Physical Activity, Prevention and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Susan Kentner
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Greuter MJ, Carvalho B, Wit MD, Dekker E, Spaander MC, Meijer GA, Engeland MV, Coupé VM. Can a biomarker triage test reduce colonoscopy burden in fecal immunochemical test screening? J Comp Eff Res 2020; 9:563-571. [PMID: 32462913 DOI: 10.2217/cer-2019-0130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To assess the potential of biomarker triage testing (BM-TT) in the Dutch colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program. Materials & methods: Using the Adenoma and Serrated pathway to Colorectal CAncer model, we simulated fecal immunochemical test (FIT)47-screening and various FIT plus BM-TT screening scenarios in which only individuals with both a positive FIT and BM-TT are referred to colonoscopy. Results: Adding a low polyp sensitivity BM-TT to FIT-screening reduced colonoscopy burden (89-100%) while increasing CRC mortality (27-41%) compared with FIT47-screening only. The FIT plus high polyp sensitivity BM-TT scenarios also decreased colonoscopy burden (71-89%) while hardly affecting CRC mortality (FIT47 0-4% increase, FIT15 2-7% decrease). Conclusion: Adding a BM-TT to FIT-screening considerably reduces colonoscopy burden, but could also decrease screening effectiveness. Combining FIT15 with a high polyp sensitivity BM-TT seems most promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjolein Je Greuter
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Decision Modeling Center, Amsterdam UMC - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Beatriz Carvalho
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Meike de Wit
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam UMC - Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manon Cw Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerrit A Meijer
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manon van Engeland
- Department of Pathology, GROW - School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Veerle Mh Coupé
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Decision Modeling Center, Amsterdam UMC - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Komor MA, Bosch LJ, Coupé VM, Rausch C, Pham TV, Piersma SR, Mongera S, Mulder CJ, Dekker E, Kuipers EJ, van de Wiel MA, Carvalho B, Fijneman RJ, Jimenez CR, Meijer GA, de Wit M. Proteins in stool as biomarkers for non-invasive detection of colorectal adenomas with high risk of progression. J Pathol 2020; 250:288-298. [PMID: 31784980 PMCID: PMC7065084 DOI: 10.1002/path.5369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2019] [Revised: 10/07/2019] [Accepted: 11/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Screening to detect colorectal cancer (CRC) in an early or premalignant state is an effective method to reduce CRC mortality rates. Current stool-based screening tests, e.g. fecal immunochemical test (FIT), have a suboptimal sensitivity for colorectal adenomas and difficulty distinguishing adenomas at high risk of progressing to cancer from those at lower risk. We aimed to identify stool protein biomarker panels that can be used for the early detection of high-risk adenomas and CRC. Proteomics data (LC-MS/MS) were collected on stool samples from adenoma (n = 71) and CRC patients (n = 81) as well as controls (n = 129). Colorectal adenoma tissue samples were characterized by low-coverage whole-genome sequencing to determine their risk of progression based on specific DNA copy number changes. Proteomics data were used for logistic regression modeling to establish protein biomarker panels. In total, 15 of the adenomas (15.8%) were defined as high risk of progressing to cancer. A protein panel, consisting of haptoglobin (Hp), LAMP1, SYNE2, and ANXA6, was identified for the detection of high-risk adenomas (sensitivity of 53% at specificity of 95%). Two panels, one consisting of Hp and LRG1 and one of Hp, LRG1, RBP4, and FN1, were identified for high-risk adenomas and CRCs detection (sensitivity of 66% and 62%, respectively, at specificity of 95%). Validation of Hp as a biomarker for high-risk adenomas and CRCs was performed using an antibody-based assay in FIT samples from a subset of individuals from the discovery series (n = 158) and an independent validation series (n = 795). Hp protein was significantly more abundant in high-risk adenoma FIT samples compared to controls in the discovery (p = 0.036) and the validation series (p = 9e-5). We conclude that Hp, LAMP1, SYNE2, LRG1, RBP4, FN1, and ANXA6 may be of value as stool biomarkers for early detection of high-risk adenomas and CRCs. © 2019 Authors. Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malgorzata A Komor
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Linda Jw Bosch
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Veerle Mh Coupé
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christian Rausch
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thang V Pham
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sander R Piersma
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra Mongera
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Chris Jj Mulder
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ernst J Kuipers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark A van de Wiel
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Beatriz Carvalho
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Remond Ja Fijneman
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Connie R Jimenez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerrit A Meijer
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Meike de Wit
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bosch LJW, Melotte V, Mongera S, Daenen KLJ, Coupé VMH, van Turenhout ST, Stoop EM, de Wijkerslooth TR, Mulder CJJ, Rausch C, Kuipers EJ, Dekker E, Domanico MJ, Lidgard GP, Berger BM, van Engeland M, Carvalho B, Meijer GA. Multitarget Stool DNA Test Performance in an Average-Risk Colorectal Cancer Screening Population. Am J Gastroenterol 2019; 114:1909-18. [PMID: 31764091 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We set out to evaluate the performance of a multitarget stool DNA (MT-sDNA) in an average-risk colonoscopy-controlled colorectal cancer (CRC) screening population. MT-sDNA stool test results were evaluated against fecal immunochemical test (FIT) results for the detection of different lesions, including molecularly defined high-risk adenomas and several other tumor characteristics. METHODS Whole stool samples (n = 1,047) were prospectively collected and subjected to an MT-sDNA test, which tests for KRAS mutations, NDRG4 and BMP3 promoter methylation, and hemoglobin. Results for detecting CRC (n = 7), advanced precancerous lesions (advanced adenoma [AA] and advanced serrated polyps; n = 119), and non-AAs (n = 191) were compared with those of FIT alone (thresholds of 50, 75, and 100 hemoglobin/mL). AAs with high risk of progression were defined by the presence of specific DNA copy number events as measured by low-pass whole genome sequencing. RESULTS The MT-sDNA test was more sensitive than FIT alone in detecting advanced precancerous lesions (46% (55/119) vs 27% (32/119), respectively, P < 0.001). Specificities among individuals with nonadvanced or negative findings (controls) were 89% (791/888) and 93% (828/888) for MT-sDNA and FIT testing, respectively. A positive MT-sDNA test was associated with multiple lesions (P = 0.005), larger lesions (P = 0.03), and lesions with tubulovillous architecture (P = 0.04). The sensitivity of the MT-sDNA test or FIT in detecting individuals with high-risk AAs (n = 19) from individuals with low-risk AAs (n = 52) was not significantly different. DISCUSSION In an average-risk screening population, the MT-sDNA test has an increased sensitivity for detecting advanced precancerous lesions compared with FIT alone. AAs with a high risk of progression were not detected with significantly higher sensitivity by MT-sDNA or FIT.
Collapse
|
10
|
Komor MA, de Wit M, van den Berg J, Martens de Kemp SR, Delis-van Diemen PM, Bolijn AS, Tijssen M, Schelfhorst T, Piersma SR, Chiasserini D, Sanders J, Rausch C, Hoogstrate Y, Stubbs AP, de Jong M, Jenster G, Carvalho B, Meijer GA, Jimenez CR, Fijneman RJA. Molecular characterization of colorectal adenomas reveals POFUT1 as a candidate driver of tumor progression. Int J Cancer 2019; 146:1979-1992. [PMID: 31411736 PMCID: PMC7027554 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2019] [Accepted: 07/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Removal of colorectal adenomas is an effective strategy to reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality rates. However, as only a minority of adenomas progress to cancer, such strategies may lead to overtreatment. The present study aimed to characterize adenomas by in‐depth molecular profiling, to obtain insights into altered biology associated with the colorectal adenoma‐to‐carcinoma progression. We obtained low‐coverage whole genome sequencing, RNA sequencing and tandem mass spectrometry data for 30 CRCs, 30 adenomas and 18 normal adjacent colon samples. These data were used for DNA copy number aberrations profiling, differential expression, gene set enrichment and gene‐dosage effect analysis. Protein expression was independently validated by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays and in patient‐derived colorectal adenoma organoids. Stroma percentage was determined by digital image analysis of tissue sections. Twenty‐four out of 30 adenomas could be unambiguously classified as high risk (n = 9) or low risk (n = 15) of progressing to cancer, based on DNA copy number profiles. Biological processes more prevalent in high‐risk than low‐risk adenomas were related to proliferation, tumor microenvironment and Notch, Wnt, PI3K/AKT/mTOR and Hedgehog signaling, while metabolic processes and protein secretion were enriched in low‐risk adenomas. DNA copy number driven gene‐dosage effect in high‐risk adenomas and cancers was observed for POFUT1, RPRD1B and EIF6. Increased POFUT1 expression in high‐risk adenomas was validated in tissue samples and organoids. High POFUT1 expression was also associated with Notch signaling enrichment and with decreased goblet cells differentiation. In‐depth molecular characterization of colorectal adenomas revealed POFUT1 and Notch signaling as potential drivers of tumor progression. What's new? Removal of colorectal adenomas is an effective strategy to reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality rates. However, as only a minority of adenomas progress to cancer, such strategies may lead to overtreatment. While high‐risk adenomas, defined by specific DNA copy number aberrations, have an increased risk of progression, the mechanisms underlying colorectal adenoma‐to‐carcinoma progression remain unclear. This molecular characterization of colorectal adenomas, CRCs, and normal adjacent colon samples demonstrates that biological processes inherent to CRC are already more active in high‐risk adenomas compared to low‐risk adenomas. Moreover, the findings highlight POFUT1 and Notch signaling as potential drivers of colorectal tumor development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malgorzata A Komor
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Oncoproteomics Laboratory, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Meike de Wit
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jose van den Berg
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne R Martens de Kemp
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Oncoproteomics Laboratory, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Anne S Bolijn
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marianne Tijssen
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tim Schelfhorst
- Oncoproteomics Laboratory, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sander R Piersma
- Oncoproteomics Laboratory, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Davide Chiasserini
- Oncoproteomics Laboratory, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joyce Sanders
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christian Rausch
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Youri Hoogstrate
- Department of Urology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andrew P Stubbs
- Department of Bioinformatics, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Guido Jenster
- Department of Urology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Beatriz Carvalho
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerrit A Meijer
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Connie R Jimenez
- Oncoproteomics Laboratory, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Remond J A Fijneman
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | -
- See Appendix for consortium members
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ried T, Meijer GA, Harrison DJ, Grech G, Franch-Expósito S, Briffa R, Carvalho B, Camps J. The landscape of genomic copy number alterations in colorectal cancer and their consequences on gene expression levels and disease outcome. Mol Aspects Med 2019; 69:48-61. [PMID: 31365882 DOI: 10.1016/j.mam.2019.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Revised: 07/23/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Aneuploidy, the unbalanced state of the chromosome content, represents a hallmark of most solid tumors, including colorectal cancer. Such aneuploidies result in tumor specific genomic imbalances, which emerge in premalignant precursor lesions. Moreover, increasing levels of chromosomal instability have been observed in adenocarcinomas and are maintained in distant metastases. A number of studies have systematically integrated copy number alterations with gene expression changes in primary carcinomas, cell lines, and experimental models of aneuploidy. In fact, chromosomal aneuploidies target a number of genes conferring a selective advantage for the metabolism of the cancer cell. Copy number alterations not only have a positive correlation with expression changes of the majority of genes on the altered genomic segment, but also have effects on the transcriptional levels of genes genome-wide. Finally, copy number alterations have been associated with disease outcome; nevertheless, the translational applicability in clinical practice requires further studies. Here, we (i) review the spectrum of genetic alterations that lead to colorectal cancer, (ii) describe the most frequent copy number alterations at different stages of colorectal carcinogenesis, (iii) exemplify their positive correlation with gene expression levels, and (iv) discuss copy number alterations that are potentially involved in disease outcome of individual patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Ried
- Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute/National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Gerrit A Meijer
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - David J Harrison
- School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland, UK
| | - Godfrey Grech
- Laboratory of Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
| | - Sebastià Franch-Expósito
- Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Oncology Group, Institut D'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), CIBEREHD, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Romina Briffa
- School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland, UK; Laboratory of Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
| | - Beatriz Carvalho
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jordi Camps
- Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Oncology Group, Institut D'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), CIBEREHD, Barcelona, Spain; Unitat de Biologia Cel·lular i Genètica Mèdica, Departament de Biologia Cel·lular, Fisiologia i Immunologia, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
van Lanschot MCJ, Carvalho B, Rausch C, Snaebjornsson P, van Engeland M, Kuipers EJ, Stoker J, Tutein Nolthenius CJ, Dekker E, Meijer GA. Molecular profiling of longitudinally observed small colorectal polyps: A cohort study. EBioMedicine 2019; 39:292-300. [PMID: 30555044 PMCID: PMC6354708 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2018] [Accepted: 12/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Knowledge of the natural history of colorectal adenomas is limited because these lesions are removed upon detection. The few studies in which small adenomas have been left in situ for a limited period of time, have shown that most lesions remain stable or even completely regress. Specific DNA copy number changes ('cancer associated events' or CAEs) are associated with progression of adenomas to cancer. In this study we evaluated whether molecular features of progression correlated with growth of small polyps. METHODS Small (6-9 mm) colorectal precursor lesions detected on CT-colonography (CTC) were left in situ and re-evaluated with CTC after three years. Based on volumetric change, polyps were classified as either grown, stable or regressed. Surveillance CTC was followed by colonoscopy, during which all lesions were resected. Using DNA isolated from FFPE polyp tissues, low-coverage whole genome sequencing was performed to determine DNA copy number profiles, as well as target enrichment mutation analysis and CpG island methylation phenotype (CIMP) analysis. Expression of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins was determined by immunohistochemistry. Samples were marked as MMR proficient if all MMR proteins were expressed. FINDINGS Out of 68 polyps resected at colonoscopy, for 65 (96%) material was available. Of these, 31 (48%) had grown, 27 (41%) remained stable and 7 (11%) regressed. Polyps with at least one CAE had higher growth rates compared to polyps without CAEs (difference 91% growth (95% CI 13-169), p = .023). CAEs were absent in lesions that had partially regressed. Mutations occurred in 94% of the polyps, with higher growth rates being associated with polyps having ≥2 mutations compared to lesions with only 0-1 mutations (difference 99% growth (95% CI 9-189), p = .032). All samples were MMR proficient. No relation between growth and CIMP was observed. INTERPRETATION Molecular alterations associated with colorectal cancer, correlated with growth of small polyps and were absent in polyps that regressed. Therefore, this longitudinal study provides in vivo support in the human setting for the functional role of these molecular alterations, that have mostly been identified by cross sectional observations in tissue samples of colorectal adenomas and cancers. FUND: Alpe d'Huzes- Dutch Cancer Society (project number NKI2013-6338).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M C J van Lanschot
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B Carvalho
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C Rausch
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P Snaebjornsson
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M van Engeland
- Department of Pathology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - E J Kuipers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Stoker
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C J Tutein Nolthenius
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E Dekker
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G A Meijer
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|