Outpatient parotidectomy: Outcomes, safety and satisfaction

PURPOSE

Parotidectomies are rarely performed on an outpatient basis. The specific perioperative outcomes and their management remains insufficiently described to change daily practice. The objectives were to study the outcomes, the complications and the patient satisfaction rate in parotidectomy performed on an outpatient basis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective monocentric database study on 85 patients who underwent parotidectomy as a first and sole procedure from 2015 to 2020. We analyzed perioperative outcomes between outpatients and inpatients.

RESULTS

Among 28 outpatients and 57 inpatients, no significant differences in total perioperative complications (p = .66; OR = 1.25; 95 % confidence interval (CI) [0.47; 3.36]), reoperations (p = .55), readmissions (p = 1), or unplanned visits (p = .52) were shown in multivariate analysis. The conversion rate for surgical reasons was 8.6 %, and the satisfaction rate was high.

CONCLUSION

Although outpatient parotidectomies should be as safe as for inpatients, the high rate of minor complications requires specific perioperative management, such as a systematic early postoperative visit and optimized preoperative information in order to be carried out with minimal issues.

The timing of drain removal in parotidectomies: outcomes of removal at 4 h post-operatively and a Canadian survey of practice patterns

BACKGROUND

The post-operative management of parotidectomies is highly provider dependent. No guidelines are currently available for timing of parotid drain removal. This study aimed to assess: (1) outcomes and complications after early drain removal (< 4 h, post-operative day [POD] 0) versus late drain removal (POD ≥ 1); (2) current Canadian provider practices.

METHODS

A single surgeons ten-year parotidectomy practice was reviewed, spanning his practice change from routine POD ≥ 1 drain removal to POD 0 removal, with extraction of patient demographic, disease, and complication variables. An anonymous, cross-sectional survey on parotid drain practices was distributed to Canadian Society of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery members. Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon Rank Sum, and unpaired student's t-tests were calculated.

RESULTS

In total, 526 patients were included and 44.7% (235/526) had drains removed POD 0. There was no significant difference in hematoma or seroma rates between the POD 0 and POD ≥ 1 drain removal cohorts. The national survey on parotid drain management had 176 responses. The majority (67.9%) reported routinely using drains after parotidectomy and 62.8% reported using a drain output based criteria for removal. The most common cut-off output was 30 ml in 24 h (range 5-70 ml).

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in hematoma or seroma rates for patients with parotid drains removed on POD 0 versus POD ≥ 1. Our national survey found significant variation in Canadian parotidectomy drain removal practices, which may be an area that can be further assessed to minimize hospital resources and improve patient care.

Safety outcomes and patient convenience in outpatient parotidectomy

BACKGROUND

Parotidectomies have historically been performed on an inpatient basis despite being well-tolerated surgeries with minimal postoperative wound care and low rates of complications at high-volume institutions. Past studies have supported the safety of outpatient surgery for parotidectomy but have been limited to superficial parotidectomy and have not addressed the patient experience surrounding the surgical intervention such as pre-operative and post-operative care and communication.

PURPOSE

This study assesses the impact of outpatient superficial, deep, and partial parotid surgery on various parameters including surgical safety, distance traveled for care, utilization of telehealth, and patient-initiated communication.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective study from January 2020 to October 2021. Patients undergoing superficial lobe, deep lobe, and partial parotidectomies for benign and malignant pathologies were divided into inpatient and outpatient cohorts. A multivariable model examined the relationship between admission status and surgical complications, adjusted for age, sex, and tumor size.

RESULTS

159 patients total, 94 outpatient and 65 inpatients. No statistical difference in rates of surgical complications with the exception of salivary leak. There was an increased rate of salivary leak reported in the inpatient group (OR 5.4, 95 % CI 1.6 to 18.0, p = 0.01). Mean patient travel distance of 354 miles one-way. Post-operatively, 76 % were evaluated via video visit. Following discharge, >55 % of patients initiated communication with the surgical team, which was not statistically different between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient parotidectomy is safe and can be more convenient, but telehealth communication must be balanced with rigorous attention to patient education.

Pediatric Orthognathic Surgery: National Analysis of Perioperative Complications

BACKGROUND

Orthognathic surgery has traditionally been performed after skeletal maturity. Although these procedures are also being performed in children, the implications of earlier intervention and specific risk factors in this younger population remain unknown.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric dataset was queried for orthognathic procedures performed in 2018. Complications, readmissions, and reoperations were analyzed with appropriate statistics.

RESULTS

Overall adverse event rate after orthognathic surgery in pediatric patients was 7.8% (n = 22 of 281), which were associated with having any comorbidity (P < 0.001), overall respiratory comorbidities (P = 0.004), structural pulmonary abnormality (P < 0.001), developmental delay (P = 0.035), structural central nervous system abnormality (P < 0.001), and neuromuscular disorder (P = 0.035). Most common complications were excessive bleeding (2.5%), surgical site infection (1.1%), and pneumonia (0.7%). Orthognathic surgery in children below 6 years of age is associated with significantly increased adverse events (P < 0.001), including surgical site infection (P < 0.001), pneumonia (P = 0.022), readmission (P < 0.001), and reoperation (P < 0.001). Le Fort I osteotomies (P < 0.001) and bilateral sagittal split osteotomies (P = 0.009) took significantly longer for older patients in the years of permanent dentition than younger patients in the years of deciduous dentition. Single- and double-jaw procedures in pediatric patients have similarly low adverse events (P all ≥0.130). Interestingly, bilateral sagittal split osteotomies performed before 13.5 years of age were associated with a higher risk of adverse events (P = 0.012), such that these younger patients were 7.1 times more likely to experience adverse events if their procedure was performed earlier.

CONCLUSIONS

Orthognathic surgery is relatively safe, but children in the years of deciduous dentition under 6 years of age have significantly increased risk of adverse events.

Pediatric Parotidectomy: Do Surgical Indications Affect Outcomes?

BACKGROUND

Parotid gland pathologies requiring resection present with varying effects on surrounding tissue architecture, and we hypothesize that this spectrum of indications confers different risks of adverse events. The purpose of this study is to elucidate the complication profiles of parotidectomy in children across a spectrum of pathologies requiring parotid resection.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric data set was queried for parotidectomies performed from 2012 through 2017. Indications were subclassified based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Tenth Revision codes. Complications, readmissions, and reoperations were analyzed with appropriate statistics.

RESULTS

Parotidectomies in children (n = 208) were mostly performed for neoplasms (47.6%), followed by inflammatory conditions (24.0%). Total parotidectomies took significantly longer (P < 0.001) and remained in the hospital significantly longer than superficial parotidectomies (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference (P = 0.417) between benign neoplasms (29.3%) and malignant neoplasms (37.9%) requiring total parotidectomy. However, there was a significant difference (P = 0.014) across various malformations, with 83.3% of lymphatic malformations requiring total parotidectomy. Although lymphatic malformations required more aggressive resection, these procedures had the lowest rate of adverse events (0%). Despite the unappreciable predilection toward total parotidectomy based on nature of neoplasms, parotidectomy performed for malignant neoplasms had a significantly increased risk of nerve injury (P < 0.001; odds ratio [OR], 3563) and medical complications (P < 0.001; OR, 67.2), whereas those performed for benign neoplasms did not have an increased risk of these complications (all P's > 0.209). Parotidectomy performed for vascular malformations had significantly increased risk of bleeding requiring transfusion (P < 0.001; OR, 14.9) and surgical complications (P < 0.001; OR, 9.2). Bleeding requiring transfusion was significantly related to longer surgical procedures (P < 0.001; 409 vs 191 minutes).

CONCLUSIONS

Parotidectomy in pediatric patients for malignant neoplasms is associated with a significantly higher risk of nerve injury compared with parotidectomy for benign neoplasms. Parotidectomy for vascular malformations has a significantly higher risk of bleeding requiring transfusion, whereas parotidectomy for lymphatic malformations is associated with the lowest risk of medical and surgical complications.

Evaluating resident involvement and the 'July effect' in parotidectomy

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of resident involvement and the 'July effect' on peri-operative complications after parotidectomy.

METHOD

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for parotidectomy procedures with resident involvement between 2005 and 2014.

RESULTS

There were 11 733 cases were identified, of which 932 involved resident participation (7.9 per cent). Resident involvement resulted in a significantly lower reoperation rate (adjusted odds ratio, 0.18; 95 per cent confidence interval, 0.05-0.73; p = 0.02) and readmission rate (adjusted odds ratios 0.30; 95 per cent confidence interval, 0.11-0.80; p = 0.02). However, resident involvement was associated with a mean 24 minutes longer adjusted operative time and 23.5 per cent longer adjusted total hospital length of stay (respective p < 0.01). No significant difference in surgical or medical complication rates or mortality was found when comparing cases among academic quarters.

CONCLUSION

Resident participation is associated with significantly decreased reoperation and readmission rates as well as longer mean operative times and total length of stay. Resident transitions during July are not associated with increased risk of adverse peri-operative outcomes after parotidectomy.

Perioperative Complications after Parotidectomy Using a Standardized Grading Scale Classification System

Perioperative complications after parotidectomy are poorly studied and have a potential impact on hospitalization stay. The Clavien–Dindo classification of postoperative complications used in visceral surgery allows a recording of all complications, including a grading scale related to the severity of complication. The cohort analyzed for perioperative complications is composed of 436 parotidectomies classified into three types, four groups, and three classes, depending on extent of parotid resection, inclusion of additional procedures, and pathology, respectively. Using the Clavien–Dindo classification, complications were reported in 77% of the interventions. In 438 complications, 430 (98.2%) were classified as minor (332 grade I and 98 grade II), and 8 (1.8%) were classified as major (grade III). Independent variables affecting the risk of perioperative complications were duration of surgery (odds ratio = 1.007, p-value = 0.029) and extent of parotidectomy (odds ratio = 4.043, p-value = 0.007). Total/subtotal parotidectomy was associated with an increased risk of grade II-III complications (odds ratio = 2.866 (95% CI: 1.307–6.283), p-value = 0.009). Median hospital stay increased moderately in patients with complications. Use of Clavien–Dindo classification shows that parotidectomy is followed by a higher rate of perioperative complications than usually reported. Almost all complications are minor and have limited consequence on hospital stay.

Surgical management and outcomes of accessory parotid gland neoplasms: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate surgical approaches and outcomes associated with accessory parotid gland neoplasms.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.

REVIEW METHODS

A systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was performed. Studies were included if they reported surgical management and outcomes of patients with accessory parotid gland neoplasms.

RESULTS

After screening 3532 records, 15 studies were included with a total of 187 patients. Benign tumors consisted of 61.5% of cases. External open, transoral, and preauricular endoscopic approaches were used for 82.3%, 11.3%, and 6.5% of cases, respectively. Accessory lobe resection alone, concurrent with partial parotidectomy, and concurrent with total parotidectomy were used in 54.8%, 43.0%, and 2.2% of cases, respectively. Complication rates were similar between histology groups (7.8% benign vs. 8.3% malignant, p = 0.82). Accessory lobe resection with concurrent partial parotidectomy had the lowest overall complication rate (6.3%). Resections limited to the accessory lobe were found to have an overall complication rate of 8.7%.

CONCLUSION

The results offer an overview of the surgical management and complications for accessory parotid gland tumors. Overall surgical complication rates found in these case series may be lower for management of accessory gland tumors than rates available in the literature for tumors within the main parotid gland.

Does neck dissection affect post-operative outcomes in parotidectomy? A national study

OBJECTIVE

To characterize post-operative complications in parotidectomy with neck dissection.

METHODS

Patients age ≥ 18 receiving a parotidectomy or parotidectomy with neck dissection between 2005 and 2017 were eligible for inclusion. Patients with unknown demographic variables were excluded. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 13,609 parotidectomy patients were analyzed, 11,243 (82.6%) without neck dissection and 2366 (17.4%) with neck dissection. Both length of surgery (mean minutes ± standard deviation [SD] = 335.9 ± 189.2 vs. 152.9 ± 99.0, p < 0.001) and length of hospital stay (mean days ± SD = 3.90 ± 4.76 vs. 1.04 ± 2.14, p < 0.001) were greater with dissection. 13.9% of parotidectomies with neck dissection and 3.5% without dissection (p < 0.001) had at least one complication, which remained significant after multivariable adjustment (Odds Ratio[OR] = 1.565 (95%CI = 1.279-1.914), p < 0.001). The increase in post-operative complications was predominately driven by an increased transfusion rate (7.4% vs. 0.5%, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis also demonstrated no significant difference in rates of returning to the operating room (OR = 1.122 (95%CI 0.843-1.493), p > 0.05) or rates of readmission (OR = 1.007 (95%CI 0.740-1.369), p > 0.05). Parotidectomy with neck dissection was more likely to be inpatient (OR = 4.411 (95%CI 3.887-5.004), p < 0.001) and to be ASA class 3 (OR = 1.367 (95%CI 1.194-1.564), p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Nationwide data demonstrates that parotidectomy with neck dissection is associated with increased rates of post-operative complications; however, neck dissection did not significantly impact readmission or reoperation rates. These findings indicate that neck dissection is a relatively safe addition to parotidectomy and provide novel evidence in the management of parotid malignancies.

Factors associated with facial weakness following surgery for benign parotid disease: a retrospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Facial nerve weakness is the most common and most concerning complication after parotidectomy. Risk factors for this complication following surgery for benign diseases remain controversial.

OBJECTIVE

Review the frequency and prognosis of facial nerve weakness after parotidectomy and analyze potential risk factors.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of medical records.

SETTINGS

Two tertiary care centers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included all parotidectomies performed for benign diseases from January 2006 to December 2018. Details about the development and recovery of postoperative facial weakness were recorded. Patient, disease and surgery-related variables were analyzed using bivariate and multivariate analyses to identify risk factors.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Frequency, recovery rates and risk factors for facial nerve weakness SAMPLE SIZE: 191 parotidectomies, 183 patients, 61 patients with facial weakness.

RESULTS

The frequency of postoperative facial weakness was 31.9% (61/191 parotidectomies). Among patients with temporary weakness, 90% regained normal facial movement within 6 months. Steroid therapy was not associated with a faster recovery. Postoperative weakness was not associated with age, diabetes, smoking, disease location, use of an intraoperative facial nerve monitor or direction of facial nerve dissection. Risk factors for temporary weakness were total parotidectomy and surgical specimens larger than 60 cubic centimeters. Revision surgery was the only identified risk factor for permanent weakness.

CONCLUSION

Larger parotid resections increase the risk of temporary facial nerve weakness while permanent weakness is mainly influenced by previous surgeries.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective nature, underpowered sample size, selection bias associated with tertiary care cases.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None.

Minor Parotidectomy Complications: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

To report descriptive statistics for minor parotidectomy complications.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed, selecting 235 studies for analysis. The incidence of complications was tabulated, and descriptive statistics calculated. Outlier studies, 1 standard deviation above the mean, were reexamined to determine potential causal factors for each complication. All studies were examined for statistically significant differences for any potential causal factor.

RESULTS

The pooled incidence of minor complications reported were hematoma 2.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.4-3.5), wound infection 2.3% (95% CI: 1.8-2.9), sialocele 4.5% (95% CI: 3.5-5.7), salivary fistula 3.1% (95% CI: 2.6-3.7), flap necrosis 1.7% (95% CI: 1.1-2.5), scar issues 3.6% (95% CI: 2.4-5.4), numbness 33.9% (95% CI: 25.6-43.4), and deformity 11.8 (95% CI: 6.9-19.5). Implants result in more wound complications, such as hematoma, sialocele, or salivary fistula. Sialocele and salivary fistula appear more frequently after less extensive parotid surgery, whereas hematoma, wound infections, flap necrosis, and aesthetic considerations are worse with more extensive resections.

CONCLUSIONS

Minor parotidectomy complications are more frequent than generally assumed and related to certain factors that should be investigated. Laryngoscope, 131:571-579, 2021.

Reconstructive trends and complications following parotidectomy: incidence and predictors in 11,057 cases

BACKGROUND

Parotidectomy is a common treatment option for parotid neoplasms and the complications associated with this procedure can cause significant morbidity. Reconstruction following parotidectomy is utilized to address contour deformity and facial nerve paralysis. This study aims to demonstrate national trends in parotidectomy patients and identify factors associated with adverse postoperative outcomes. This study includes the largest patient database to date in determining epidemiologic trends, reconstructive trends, and prevalence of adverse events following parotidectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed for parotidectomies included in the ACS-NSQIP database between January 2012 and December 2017. CPT codes were used to identify the primary and secondary procedures performed. Univariate and multivariate analysis was utilized to determine associations between pre- and perioperative variables with patient outcomes. Preoperative demographics, surgical indications, and common medical comorbidities were collected. CPT codes were used to identify patients who underwent parotidectomy with or without reconstruction. These pre- and perioperative characteristics were compared with 30-day surgical complications, medical complications, reoperation, and readmission using uni- and multivariate analyses to determine predictors of adverse events.

RESULTS

There were 11,057 patients who underwent parotidectomy. Postoperative complications within 30 days were uncommon (1.7% medical, 3.8% surgical), with the majority of these being surgical site infection (2.7%). Free flap reconstruction, COPD, bleeding disorders, smoking, and presence of malignant tumor were the strongest independent predictors of surgical site infection. Readmission and reoperation were uncommon at an incidence of 2.1% each. The strongest factors predictive of readmission were malignant tumor and corticosteroid usage. The strongest factors predictive of reoperation were free flap reconstruction, malignant tumor, bleeding disorder, and disseminated cancer. Surgical volume/contour reconstruction was relatively uncommon (18%). Facial nerve sacrifice was uncommon (3.7%) and, of these cases, only 25.5% underwent facial nerve reinnervation and 24.0% underwent facial reanimation.

CONCLUSIONS

There are overall low rates of complications, readmissions, and reoperations following parotidectomy. However, certain factors are predictive of adverse postoperative events and this data may serve to guide management and counseling of patients undergoing parotidectomy. Concurrent reconstructive procedures are not commonly reported which may be due to underutilization or underreporting.

Understanding nationwide readmissions after parotidectomy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the incidence, causes, risk factors, and costs associated with 30-day readmissions in parotidectomy patients utilizing the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

We examined the NRD for patients who underwent parotidectomy between 2010 and 2014. Rates, causes, and costs of 30-day readmissions were determined. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for readmission.

RESULTS

Among 15,102 included patients, 594 (3.9%) were readmitted within 30 days. The average cost per readmission was $12,502. Infectious (22.7%) and wound (11.2%) complications were the two most common causes of readmission. After controlling for other covariates, significant predictors of readmission included advanced comorbidity (odds ratio [OR], 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-2.37), a malignant parotid tumor (OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.63-3.43), length of stay ≥2 days (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.09-2.18), and nonroutine discharge destinations (home with care [OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.27-2.78] and nursing facility [OR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.55-4.67]).

CONCLUSION

In this nationwide database analysis, we found that nearly 4% of all patients undergoing parotidectomy are readmitted within 30 days. Readmissions are commonly due to infections and wound complications. Quality improvement proposals targeting avoidable readmissions should focus on early recognition and prevention of infection and wound complications. Risk factors contributing to readmission include advanced comorbidity, malignant parotid tumor, prolonged index hospitalization, and nonroutine discharge destinations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 130:1212-1217, 2020.

Parotidectomy in patients with head and neck cutaneous melanoma with cervical lymph node involvement

BACKGROUND

Parotidectomy in melanoma of the coronal scalp and face with clinically involved cervical lymph node metastasis is based on predicted cervical lymphatic drainage described by O'Brien.

METHODS

In total, 40 parotidectomies with en bloc therapeutic neck dissection were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Lymphatic spread of melanoma to the parotid lymph nodes was observed in 10 of 40 specimens (25%). Eight of the 10 parotid-positive patients developed a recurrence vs 17 of the 30 parotid-negative patients (P = 0.28). There were no differences in overall survival, melanoma-specific survival, and disease-free survival between the parotid-positive and parotid-negative patients.

CONCLUSION

Although in this series no survival differences were found, parotidectomy still merits a sustained role in therapeutic neck dissection procedures to improve regional control and to prevent facial nerve damage after surgery for a second relapse from occult metastases in the parotid.

Body Mass Index and Parotidectomy Outcomes

Multiple specialties have demonstrated increased risk of certain postoperative complications in patients with an increased body mass index (BMI). The goal of this study was to understand the outcomes of patients undergoing parotidectomy with an increased BMI and to identify any other patient risk factors for postoperative complications. This study was a retrospective chart review of 432 patients. Patient variables collected included BMI, age, gender, history of diabetes mellitus, type of parotidectomy, and pathology. Outcomes reviewed included facial nerve weakness, hematoma or seroma formation, and wound infection. The results showed that BMI had no statistically significant effect on complications. However, patients undergoing a total parotidectomy, malignant pathology, and patients with a history of diabetes mellitus had significantly more postoperative facial weakness. In conclusion, BMI does not influence postoperative complications in patients undergoing parotidectomy. Patients with diabetes, those undergoing total parotidectomies, and patients with malignant pathology have significantly more facial weakness and should be counseled accordingly.

Antegrade versus retrograde facial nerve dissection in benign parotid surgery: Is there a difference in postoperative outcomes? A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of this meta-analysis was to test the null hypothesis of no difference in facial nerve dysfunction in studies that compared classical antegrade facial nerve dissection (AFND) versus retrograde facial nerve dissection (RFND) during benign parotid surgery.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Google Scholar, Science Direct and relevant journals was undertaken up to June 27, 2018. Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials (CCTs), and retrospective studies aimed at comparing the effect of AFND vs. RFND during parotidectomy were included. The outcome measures included facial nerve dysfunction, Frey's syndrome, recurrence, silaocele, salivary fistula, operating time length of hospital stay, and estimated blood loss. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using either a fixed-effects or random-effects model.

RESULTS

Ten studies; four RCTs and five retrospective studies were included. There were 570 patients (319 in RFND group and 251 in AFND group). 481 patients in 9 studies reported the incidence rate of facial nerve dysfunction. No statistical significant difference was observed between both groups concerning the occurrence of transient or permanent facial nerve paralysis (p = 0.44 and 0.11 respectively). One out 10 studies reported the incidence rate of sialocele, however no statistical difference was observed between the two techniques. There was reduction in the operative time (19.30 min), amount of blood loss (25.08 ml) and amount of healthy salivary tissues removed (12.20 mm) in RFND compared with AFND.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the results of the current review there is no evidence demonstrating a significant advantage of one approach over another, therefore, well-designed standardized RCTs are required.

Evaluation of postoperative complications in elderly patients submitted to parotidectomy

OBJECTIVE

to evaluate the most incident histological subtypes and the main postoperative complications in elderly patients with parotid tumors submitted to parotidectomy.

METHODS

we conducted a retrospective study with 57 elderly patients submitted to parotidectomy from 2003 to 2017, at the São José County Hospital of Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil.

RESULTS

thirty-three (57.9%) patients had benign tumors, the most frequent being Warthin's tumor, and 17 (29.8%), malignant tumors, squamous cell carcinoma being the most frequent. Seven patients (12.3%) presented clinical complications, arterial pressure instability and respiratory complications being the most frequent, in four (7%) and three (5.3%) cases, respectively. Thirteen (22.1%) patients presented complications related to the surgical wound, hematoma and wound infection being the most frequent, with six (10.5%) cases each. Twenty-four (42.1%) patients had some degree of facial nerve dysfunction in the postoperative period, Brackman-House grade III being the most frequent, in 11 cases (19.3%). Surgical time and lymphadenectomy were associated with clinical complications. The main variables that showed an association with surgical complications were tumor size, longer surgical time, reoperation, and perioperative crystalloid infusion volume.

CONCLUSION

parotid neoplasms present a differentiated profile in the elderly population, especially Warthin's tumor and squamous cell carcinoma. Hematoma and infection of the operative wound and facial nerve lesions were the most prevalent complications in the postoperative period.

Evidence Based Tailored Parotidectomy in Treating External Auditory Canal Carcinoma

Carcinoma of the external auditory canal (EAC) is a rare tumor and little information is available regarding parotid gland in surgically treating EAC carcinomas. This study aimed to investigate the mode of parotid involvement in EAC carcinoma through staging and histopathological analysis, and to establish surgical guidelines for the parotid gland management when there is no clinical evidence of parotid involvement. Sixty-five patients with EAC carcinoma who underwent temporal bone resection and any type of parotidectomy simultaneously were retrospectively reviewed. The rate of direct parotid invasion and parotid nodal involvement was analyzed according to the stage and histopathological findings. Among the 65 patients, 39 were confirmed to have squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and 26 were confirmed to have adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC). Direct parotid invasion occurred in 7 of 39 patients with SCC, only in the advanced stages, and in 15 of 26 patients with ACC, regardless of stage. Metastasis to the parotid node was noted in 6 patients with advanced-stage SCC, whereas no patient with ACC showed parotid nodal metastasis. For adequate tumor control with low risk of surgical complications, evidence based tailored parotidectomy should be applied. With no evidence of parotid involvement, an elective parotidectomy can be excluded in early SCC, whereas a total parotidectomy is recommended for advanced SCC. In ACC, basal resection of the parotid gland rather than a superficial or total parotidectomy should be performed at all disease stages.

Complications of traditional and modern therapeutic salivary approaches

The morbidity following traditional surgery of the salivary glands is well documented and includes postsurgical complications such as the Frey's syndrome, complete or partial facial nerve damage, facial scarring, greater auricular nerve numbness, sialocoeles and salivary fistula. The avulsion of the salivary duct, secondary strictures, gland swelling, salivary fistulas and perforations (false rout), traumatic ranulas, and the lingual nerve paraesthesia are the main endoscopy-related complications. In general, the rate of postsurgical complications after modern advanced minimally invasive surgical interventions is significantly lower compared with traditional surgery of the salivary glands. However, such comparisons cannot be performed because up-to-date traditional and minimally invasive surgical techniques are applied to different salivary disorders. Combinations of various minimally invasive techniques are also possible. There is no clear borderline between "traditional" and "modern" surgery of the salivary glands. It is appropriate to write about gradual replacement of old techniques with newer ones, and this process has no traffic lights.

Predictors of Readmission and Reoperation in Patients Undergoing Parathyroidectomy for Primary Hyperparathyroidism

Objective Identify risk factors for 30-day reoperation and readmission after parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism. Study Design Retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2012 through 2014. Subjects and Methods Patients undergoing parathyroidectomy and parathyroid reexploration for primary hyperparathyroidism. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine risk factors for reoperation and readmission. Results Of the 9439 patients who underwent parathyroidectomy, 72 patients underwent 1 reoperation in the first 30 days after surgery, and 8 patients underwent 2 reoperations. The most common reasons were hematoma (25%) and persistent hyperparathyroidism (15.9%). Risk factors included smoking (odds ratio [OR], 1.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-3.31), insulin-dependent diabetes (OR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.02-4.86), and history of bleeding disorder (OR, 3.95; 95% CI, 1.48-8.79). In total, 182 (1.9%) patients were readmitted within 30 days of surgery; the most common cause was hypocalcemia (17.0%). Risk factors included operative time (hours) (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.5), insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.2-3.3), dyspnea with moderate exertion (OR, 5.77; 95% CI, 0.86-14.67), and age (decade) (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.02-1.32). Patients undergoing outpatient surgery were less likely to be readmitted (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.35-0.69) or undergo reoperation (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.27-0.73). Conclusions Thirty-day reoperation rate after parathyroidectomy was low and most commonly occurred due to hematoma. Risk factors for readmission were multifactorial and associated with perioperative factors, patient factors, and medical comorbidities. Preoperative counseling for patients at increased risk of readmission and reoperation may decrease these rates.

Adverse Events Following Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery: A Comparison of Surgical Approach

OBJECTIVE

Compare complications of vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection by surgical approach.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

The 2008 to 2013 American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

PATIENTS

Adult patients with VS resection by an otolaryngologist.

INTERVENTIONS

VS resection via transtemporal (TT), retrosigmoid (RS), or middle cranial fossa (MCF) approaches.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Hearing preservation approaches were compared with hearing sacrificing approaches. Demographics and intraoperative factors were analyzed to identify predictors of medical and surgical complications, return to the operating room, and death. The effect of trainee presence was evaluated with respect to complications, operative length, and hospital length of stay.

RESULTS

One hundred eleven VS resections were identified. Patients were predominantly women (57%) and older than 50 years (69%). The TT approach accounted for 50% of the cases, while RS (36%) and MCF (14%) were less common. The risk of any postoperative complication was 17%. There were no patient deaths. There was no difference in the overall complication rate among surgical approaches, nor in the overall, surgical, or medical complication rates between hearing preservation and hearing sacrificing approaches. Trainee presence did not change operation length, hospital length of stay, or complication rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Complication rates of VS resection are no different when comparing TT, RS, or MCF approaches. Trainee involvement did not significantly affect complications. This study is limited by the inability to evaluate procedure-specific variables (e.g., facial nerve weakness and hearing preservation rates), but offers a unique survey of global 30-day complication rates reported to a large, multi-institutional, publically available database.

Frey's syndrome after superficial parotidectomy: role of the sternocleidomastoid muscle flap: a prospective nonrandomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of Frey's syndrome (FS) after superficial parotidectomy in correlation to the sternocleidomastoid muscle flap (SCMMF) interposition is analyzed.

METHODS

A prospective nonrandomized controlled multicenter trial included 130 patients. During superficial parotidectomy, SCMMF was dissected, if excised specimens' volume exceeded 25 mL (SCMMF group). Follow-up examinations took place after 6, 12, and 24 months and included a Minor's test.

RESULTS

SCMMF was dissected in 30 (23.1%) patients. A total of 104, 80, and 68 patients completed the 1st, 2nd, and the 3rd follow-up, respectively. FS was detectable with nonvarying prevalence (46.3%, 45.6%, and 43.4%, respectively) during follow-up. The prevalence was higher in the SCMMF group (59.9%) than in the non-SCMMF group (41.8%; P = .92). The sweating area increased during follow-up (P = .12). Overall, 89.5% of patients characterized FS as not disturbing after 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

FS occurred with a steady and high prevalence after superficial parotidectomy. In particular, SCMMF did not lower the risk of FS.

Predictors of 30-day morbidity and mortality in transnasal microscopic pituitary tumor excision

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of population-based, multi-institutional analyses of factors associated with morbidity and mortality following pituitary tumor excision.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project files were used to compile information on patients that had undergone transnasal microscopic pituitary tumor resection from 2006 to 2012. Patient demographics, comorbidities, operative characteristics, and morbidity and mortality in the 30 days following surgery were included. Multivariate logistic regression was used for categorical variables and multivariate linear regression was used for continuous variables to evaluate factors leading to adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 658 patients were included, of which 58 (8.81%) experienced a complication, reoperation or death in the 30 days following surgery. The most common complications were reoperation (3.37%), followed by unplanned reintubation (1.99%), urinary tract infection (1.68%), and transfusion (1.68%). Predictors of any complication, reoperation, or death include preoperative sepsis (odds ratio [OR] = 7.596) and lower preoperative serum albumin (OR = 6.667). Younger age predicted surgical complications (OR = 1.105). Predictors of medical complications include higher body mass index (OR = 1.112), chronic steroid use (OR = 6.568), preoperative sepsis (OR = 15.297), and lower preoperative serum hematocrit (OR = 1.225). Predictors of increased total length of hospital stay were older age (β = 0.146), higher body mass index (β = 0.188), chronic steroid use (β = 0.142), preoperative sepsis (β = 0.489), and lower preoperative serum albumin (β = -0.213).

CONCLUSION

Although adverse events following pituitary tumor excision are low, awareness of factors associated with morbidity and mortality in the early postoperative period may allow for improved patient monitoring and outcomes.