Clinical Profile of a New Monoclonal Antibody-Based Immunoassay for Tissue Polypeptide Antigen

Accuracy of cytokeratin 19 fragment in the diagnosis of bladder cancer

Aim: CYFRA21-1 is a biomarker of cancer and has a promising future in the diagnosis of bladder cancer. The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of CYFRA21-1 for bladder cancer. Methods: We included articles from the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed and Embase. Meta-DiSc 1.4 and Stata 12.0 were used for data analysis. Results: Twenty-eight articles were analyzed, and the results are as follows: sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR and AUC were 0.69 (95% CI [0.67, 0.71]), 0.81 (95% CI [0.80, 0.83]), 5.99 (95% CI [4.42, 8.11]), 0.31 (95% CI [0.25, 0.38]), 24.58 (95% CI [15.15, 39.89]) and 0.8917, respectively. Conclusion: CYFRA21-1 has a high diagnostic efficiency for bladder cancer.

Diagnostic accuracy of cytokeratin-19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1) for bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Previous studies have evaluated the accuracy of serum and urinary measurements of cytokeratin-19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1) for the diagnosis of bladder cancer; however, the results have been inconsistent. The aim of this study was to evaluate the overall accuracy of CYFRA 21-1 for the diagnosis of bladder cancer. We performed a search for English-language publications reporting on the detection of CYFRA21-1 levels for the diagnosis of bladder cancer through November 2, 2014, using public medical databases, including EMBASE, Web of Science, and Medline. The quality of the studies was assessed by revised QUADAS tools. The performance characteristics were pooled and analyzed using a bivariate model. Publication bias was explored with the Deek's test. Sixteen studies, with a total 1,262 bladder-cancer patients and 1,233 non-bladder-cancer patients, were included in the study. The pooled sensitivities for serum and urine CYFRA 21-1 were 0.42 (95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.33-0.51) and 0.82 (95 % CI, 0.70-0.90), respectively. The corresponding specificities were 0.94 (95 % CI, 0.90-0.96) and 0.80 (95 % CI, 0.73-0.86), respectively. The areas under the summary receiver-operating-characteristic curves for serum and urine CYFRA 21-1 were 0.88 (95 % CI, 0.85-0.91) and 0.87 (95 % CI, 0.84-0.90), respectively. The major design deficiencies of the included studies were participant-selection bias, potential review, and verification bias. Therefore, we concluded that both serum and urine CYFRA 21-1 served as efficient indexes for bladder-cancer diagnosis. Additional, well-designed studies should be performed to rigorously evaluate the diagnostic value of CYFRA 21-1 for bladder cancer.

Peripheral and mesenteric serum levels of CEA and cytokeratins, staging and histopathological variables in colorectal adenocarcinoma

AIM: To evaluate the differences that exist bet-ween peripheral and mesenteric serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratins in patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS: One hundred and thirty-eight patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery at Hospital São Paulo (Discipline of Surgical Gastroenterology of UNIFESP-EPM) between December 1993 and March 2000 were retrospectively analyzed. Differences between CEA and cytokeratin (TPA-M) levels in peripheral blood (P) and in mesenteric blood (M) were studied. Associations were investigated between peripheral and mesenteric levels and the staging and histopathological variables (degree of cell differentiation, macroscopic appearance, tumor dimensions and presence of lymphatic and venous invasion).

RESULTS: Differences were observed in the numerical values of the marker levels: CEA (M) (39.10 mg/L ± 121.19 mg/L) vs CEA (P) (38.5 mg/L ± 122.55 mg/L), P < 0.05; TPA-M (M) (325.06 U/L ± 527.29 U/L) vs TPA-M (P) (279.48 U/L ± 455.81 U/L), P < 0.01. The mesenteric CEA levels were higher in more advanced tumors (P < 0.01), in vegetating lesions (34.44 mg/L ± 93.07 mg/L) (P < 0.01) and with venous invasion (48.41 mg/L ± 129.86 mg/L) (P < 0.05). Peripheral CEA was higher with more advanced staging (P < 0.01) and in lesions with venous invasion (53.23 mg/L ± 158.57 mg/L) (P < 0.05). The patients demonstrated increased mesenteric and peripheral TPA-M levels with more advanced tumors (P < 0.01 and P < 0.01) and in non-ulcerated lesions [530.45 U/L ± 997.46 U/L (P < 0.05) and 457.95 U/L ± 811.36 U/L (P < 0.01)].

CONCLUSION: The mesenteric levels of the tumor markers CEA and cytokeratins were higher than the peripheral levels in these colorectal adenocarcinoma patients. Higher levels of these biologic tumor markers are associated with an advanced state of cancerous dissemination.

Value of carcinoembryonic antigen and cytokeratins for the detection of recurrent disease following curative resection of colorectal cancer

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of postoperative serial assay of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratins for the detection of recurrent disease in patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma after radical surgery.

METHODS: Between 1993 and 2000, 120 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma underwent radical surgery in the Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Federal University of São Paulo-Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, Brazil. Periodic postoperative evaluation was performed by assaying markers in peripheral serum, colonoscopy and imaging examination. Presence of CEA was detected using the Delfia^® method with 5 μg/L threshold, and cytokeratins using the LIA-mat^® TPA-M Prolifigen^® method with 72 U/L threshold.

RESULTS: In the first postoperative year, patients without recurrent disease had normal levels of CEA (1.5 ± 0.9 μg/L) and monoclonal tissue polypeptide antigen-M (TPA-M, 64.4 ± 47.8 U/L), while patients with recurrences had high levels of CEA (6.9 ± 9.8 μg/L, P < 0.01) and TPA-M (192.2 ± 328.8 U/L, P < 0.05). During the second postoperative year, patients without tumor recurrence had normal levels of CEA (2.0 ± 1.8 μg/L) and TPA-M (50.8 ± 38.4 U/L), while patients with recurrence had high levels of CEA (66.3 ± 130.8 μg/L, P < 0.01) and TPA-M (442.7 ± 652.8 U/L, P < 0.05). The mean follow-up time was 22.3 mo. There was recurrence in 23 cases. Five reoperations were performed without achieving radical excision. Rises in tumor marker levels preceded identification of recurrences: CEA in seven (30%) and TPA-M in eleven individuals (48%).

CONCLUSION: Intensive follow-up by serial assay of CEA and cytokeratins allows early detection of colorectal neoplasm recurrence.

Cytokeratins and carcinoembryonic antigen in diagnosis, staging and prognosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma

AIM: To evaluate the serum levels of cytokeratins and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in diagnosis, staging and prognosis of patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS: The sample consisted of 169 patients. One hundred blood donors formed the control group. Radical surgery was performed on 120 patients, with an average follow-up duration of 22.3 mo. Relapses occurred in 23 individuals after an average of 18.09 mo. CEA was assayed via the Delfia^® method with a limit of 5 ng/mL. Cytokeratins were assayed via the LIA-mat^® TPA-M Prolifigen^® method with a limit of 72 U/L.

RESULTS: In the diagnosis of patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma, CEA showed a sensitivity of 56%, a specificity of 95%, a positive predictive value of 94%, a negative predictive value of 50% and an accuracy of 76.8%. TPA-M had a sensitivity of 70%, a specificity of 96%, a positive predictive value of 97%, a negative predictive value of 66% and an accuracy of 93.6%. The elevation of one of the markers was shown to have a sensitivity of 76.9%, a specificity of 91%, a positive predictive value of 93.5%, a negative predictive value of 70% and an accuracy of 83.6%. There was no variation in the levels of the markers according to the degree of cell differentiation while there was an elevation in their concentrations in accordance with the increase in neoplastic dissemination. There was a statistically significant difference between the patients with stage IV lesions and those with stages I, II and III tumors. With regard to CEA, the average level was 14.2 ng/mL in patients with stage I lesions, 8.5 ng/mL in patients with stage II lesions, 8.0 ng/mL in patients with stage III lesions and 87.7 ng/mL in patients with stage IV lesions. In relation to TPA-M, the levels were 153.1 U/L in patients with stage I tumors, 106.5 U/L in patients with stage II tumors, 136.3 U/L in patients with stage III tumors and 464.3 U/L in patients with stage IV tumors. There was a statistical difference in patients with a high CEA level in relation to a shorter survival (P<0.05). However, there was no correlation between patients with high TPA-M levels and prognostic indices of patients undergoing radical surgery.

CONCLUSION: Cytokeratins demonstrate a greater sensitivity than CEA in the diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma. There is an increase in the sensitivity of the markers with tumor dissemination. Cytokeratins cannot identify the worse prognosis in patients undergoing radical surgery. Cytokeratins constitute an advance in the direction of a perfect tumor marker in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer.

Clinical utility of cytokeratins as tumor markers

Cytokeratins, belonging to the intermediate filament (IF) protein family, are particularly useful tools in oncology diagnostics. At present, more than 20 different cytokeratins have been identified, of which cytokeratins 8, 18, and 19 are the most abundant in simple epithelial cells. Upon release from proliferating or apoptotic cells, cytokeratins provide useful markers for epithelial malignancies, distinctly reflecting ongoing cell activity. It appears that motifs in certain cytokeratins make them likely substrates for caspase degradation, and their subsequent release occurs during the intermediate events in apoptosis. The clinical value of determining soluble cytokeratin protein fragments in body fluids lies in the early detection of recurrence and the fast assessment of the efficacy of therapy response in epithelial cell carcinomas. The three most applied cytokeratin markers used in the clinic are tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA), tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPS), and CYFRA 21-1. TPA is a broad spectrum test that measures cytokeratins 8, 18, and 19. TPS and CYFRA 21-1 assays are more specific and measure cytokeratin 18 and cytokeratin 19, respectively. By following patients with repeated testing during management, the oncologist may obtain critical information regarding the growth activity in symptomatic patients. Although their main use is to monitor treatment and evaluate response to therapy, early prognostic information particularly on tumor progression and metastasis formation is also provided for several types of cancers. Cytokeratin tumor markers can accurately predict disease status before conventional methods and offer a simple, noninvasive, cheap, and reliable tool for more efficient management.

Effect of Opium Smoking on Concentrations of Carcinoembryonic Antigen and Tissue Polypeptide Antigen

Previous studies have related opium and its pyrolysates to the risk of developing certain cancers. The aim of this work was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of determining carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) levels in habitual opium smokers. Serum CEA concentrations were measured in 128 opium smokers and in 44 controls of cigarette only smokers and 47 normal non-smokers by an EIA-based assay. TPA levels were also determined in serum and urine of a subgroup in the study population. The results indicated that serum CEA concentrations are higher in opium smokers than in healthy tobacco smokers (p=0.004) and non-smokers (p=0.001). The amount of opium used correlated with the serum CEA level (r=0.276, p<0.0001). The mean urine and serum TPA levels of the opium-addicted population were also higher than that of the non-smoking control group, but the differences were not statistically significant. We conclude that opium smoking is associated with elevated serum CEA levels. Therefore, for management of opium users with neoplastic diseases, increased levels of serum CEA should be viewed with caution to avoid misdiagnosis.

Lung tumor markers of cytokeratin origin: an overview

Lung tumor markers fall into several categories including oncofetal proteins, structural proteins and their fragments, enzymes, membrane antigens, peptide and non-peptide hormones. Cytokeratins (CK) are well known structural proteins whose degradation gives rise to soluble fragments, measurable in the blood of patients and capable of cancer marking. Among them, Tissue Polypeptide Antigen (TPA), Tissue Polypeptide-Specific Antigen (TPS) and Cytokeratin-19-Fragments (Cyfra 21-1) are the most studied CK fragments' complexes. This article will review biological characteristics and clinical properties of these substances, emphasizing as their concentration in the peripheral blood might reflect the mass of tumor, the rate of cancer cell lysis, and other potentially unfavorable tumor characteristics. Assaying the concentration of CK fragments in the blood is an easy and effective way to assess lung cancer and monitor its clinical evolution.

Cytokeratin-derived markers of lung cancer

Various evaluation methods are available for aiding clinicians in lung cancer management. Some of these methods are highly specific. However, they are also invasive and burdened by non-negligible complication rates (e.g., mediastinoscopy); other methods are highly accurate and noninvasive, but require expensive equipment and well-trained personnel (e.g., PET scanning); others are fast, inexpensive and safe. However, their diagnostic yield is low and requires further clinical testing (an example of such tests is the chest-x-ray film). There is probably only one way to perform an easy, inexpensive, repeatable test, which is also fairly accurate and predictive. This is tumor marker testing, which--as a large and specialized literature shows--can be highly effective when based on a cytokeratin-derived marker assay.

[Study of the cytosolic concentrations of the tissue poly-peptide specific (TPS) antigen in infiltrating ductal carcinomas of the breast. Positive relationship with hormone dependency and negative with cellular proliferation]

INTRODUCTION

The tissue-specific polypeptide antigen (TPS) is an epitope of the tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) which is defined by the M3 monoclonal antibody and is related to cytokeratin 18. Several groups have demonstrated its value as a useful parameter in the follow-up of some tumors. This work has aimed to study the TPS cytosolic levels in infiltrating ductal carcinomas of the breast (IDC) and their possible correlations with other clinical-biological parameters.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The TPS was determined by means of an immunoradiometric assay (Beki Diagnostics. Sweden). Other parameters included in the study were the estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR), pS2, cathepsin D, tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA), tumor size, axillary lymph node involvement, distant metastases, histological grade, ploidy and S-phase.

RESULTS

The TPS cytosolic levels ranged from 1.8 to 606.3 KU/mg prt. (median 110.2) and had a significant correlation with the ER (r: 0.721), PR (r: 0.287), cathepsin D (r: 0.550) and t-PA (r:0.436). The TPS positive (> 110.2 KU/mg prt.) carcinomas had higher levels of ER (p: 0.001), PR (p: 0.021), pS2 (p: 0.058), cathepsin D (p: 0.000) and t-PA (p: 0.053) than the TPS negative tumors. When the IDC were classified according to S-phase values, we observed that the positive cases (S-phase > 8.1%, which represents the median value of all carcinomas) had lower levels of TPS (p: 0.046) than the negative tumors. Likewise, the GoG1 cellular fraction correlated positively and significantly with the TPS cytosolic levels (p: 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our results, we suggest that there is a positive correlation between the TPS cytosolic levels and hormone-dependence parameters, as well as an inverse correlation between these and the cellular proliferation parameters. Based on the above, we consider that it is worthwhile to carry out further studies on cytosolic TPS in order to investigate its possible value as a prognostic parameter in breast carcinomas.

Biological behaviour and clinical implications of micrometastases

BACKGROUND

The most important prognostic determinant in cancer is the identification of disseminated tumour burden (metastases). Micrometastases are microscopic (smaller than 2 mm) deposits of malignant cells that are segregated spatially from the primary tumour and depend on neovascular formation (angiogenesis) to propagate.

METHODS

The electronic literature (1966 to present) on micrometastases and their implications in malignant melanoma and epithelial cancers was reviewed.

RESULTS

Immunohistochemical techniques combined with serial sectioning offer the best accuracy for detection of nodal micrometastases. Molecular techniques should be reserved for blood samples or bone marrow aspirates. Detection of micrometastases in regional lymph nodes and/or bone marrow confers a poor prognosis in epithelial cancers. The concept of sentinel node biopsy combined with serial sectioning and dedicated screening for micrometastases may improve staging procedures. Strategies against angiogenesis may provide novel therapies to induce and maintain micrometastatic dormancy.

CONCLUSION

The concept of micrometastases has resulted in a paradigm shift in the staging of epithelial tumours and our overall understanding of malignant processes.

Tissue concentrations of tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) and prostatic specific antigen (PSA) in 42 patients with prostatic carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Following development of methods to quantitate biochemical markers in aspiration biopsies we showed that tissue concentration of prostate specific antigen (T-PSA) decreased with increasing malignancy while serum PSA increased. We also found that T-PSA predicts the clinical outcome better than earlier used prognostic markers.

METHODS

In order to further study biochemical markers in prostatic cancer a membrane protein, tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA), which is a complex of polypeptide fragments of cytokeratins 8, 18, and 19, was quantitated in 42 patients with newly diagnosed carcinoma of the prostate. The samples had previously been analyzed for T-PSA.

RESULTS

Correlation to TGM classification showed that higher malignancy is correlated to lower tissue TPA values. There is a significant positive correlation (r(s) = 0.49, P < 0.01) between T-TPA and T-PSA. Pretreatment values of T-PSA, but not T-TPA, had association to time to progression or time to death.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing prostatic malignancy is correlated to decreasing values of T-TPA. This indicates that the concentrations of membrane and secretory proteins are changed in the same direction in tissue during cancer development. Tissue TPA seem to have no prognostic value in endocrine treatment of prostatic carcinoma.

Comparison of tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) with cancer antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in follow-up of breast cancer

Cancer antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) were measured in 679 sera of breast cancer patients and in 94 sera of women without breast cancer. The tumour markers were determined using immunoluminometric assays (ILMA). The assays are characterised by an inter-assay-imprecision and intra-assay-imprecision <4 %. The breast cancer patients were staged according to the TNM classification stage 0-IV (by UICC) in patient groups with a compatible prognosis. Median and range of each stage were investigated. The cut-off values (95th and 97.5th percentile of control group) of CA 15-3, CEA and TPA were determined; specificity, sensitivity, positive and negative predictive value (PV) and efficiency were investigated for these cut-off's and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated. The differences between control group and stage 0-3 were shown as non-significant for CA 15-3 and CEA but significant for TPA. Significant differences were found in stage 4 for all three tumour markers. The three tumour markers did not have differences in specificity, positive and negative PV and efficiency. TPA and CA 15-3 demonstrated comparable results in sensitivity and ROC curve analyses. These results were better than those from CEA.