Correlation between pS2 protein positivity, steroid receptor status and other prognostic factors in breast cancer

Clinicopathological study of the expression of hsp27, pS2, cathepsin D and metallothionein in primary invasive breast cancer

Expression of the hormone-related proteins hsp27, pS2, and also of cathepsin D (CD) and metallothionein (MT) was studied by immunohistochemistry and analyzed against clinical data in breast cancer. Archived material of paraffin-embedded breast carcinoma tissues from a cohort of 134 patients with primary invasive breast cancer was used. Hsp27 and pS2 (>10% of tumor cells stained) were found to be expressed in 63.6% and 37.6% of cases, respectively, and were correlated negatively with grading (P=0.006 and 0.01) and positively with estrogen receptors (ER) (P=0.04 and 0.04). pS2 expression was correlated with lymph node status (P=0.02), tumor size (P=0.01), progesterone receptor (PR) content (P=0.02), hsp27 (P=0.015) and bcl-2 protein (P=0.001). An inverse relationship between pS2 expression and the expression of p53 protein (P=0.005) and proliferation-associated index MIB1 (P<0.0001) was noted. Stromal cathepsin D was positively correlated with tumor grade (P=0.01), PCNA (P=0.007), MIB1 (P=0.001) and p53 (P=0.01), and negatively with ER (P=0.04) and bcl-2 (P<0.0001). MT was correlated positively with stromal CD (P=0.007) and inversely with PgR (P=0.04). Univariate analysis showed CD expression to be a positive prognostic factor for survival (P=0.035), with borderline significance, while MT was more strongly positive (P=0.01). However, none of the proteins studied was found to be related to disease outcome in univariate analysis. Our data show that hsp27, pS2 and stromal CD expression may reflect tumor differentiation and the functional status of ER in breast cancer, but stromal CD and tumor MT expression were the only factors found that may be of limited prognostic value.

[Clinico-biological impact of pS2 positivity in estrogen receptor negative-infiltrating ductal carcinomas of the breast]

The pS2 protein is regulated by estrogens, but it can also be expressed in hormone independent breast carcincomas. We have carried out the present study in order to analyze the clinical-biological impact of pS2 positivity (>2 ng/mg prt.) in negative estrogen receptors (< 10 fmol/mg prt.) infiltrating ductal breast carcinomas (IDC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

97 negative ER-IDC have been included in our study. We established the doses of the cytosol levels of pS2, progesterone receptors (PR), cathepsin D, tissue -type plasminogen activator (t-PA) and hyaluronic acid (HA), as well as the levels of HA, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), CD44v5 and CD44v6 in cell surface membranes. We also considered the menopausal status, histological grade, ploidy, cellular synthesis phase, tumor size, axillary lymph node involvement and the existence of distant metastasis. The same results were obtained when the progesterone receptor status was also considered.

RESULTS

ER-/pS2+ IDC presented higher (p <0,05) PR, t-PA and HA cytosol level, as well as lower EGFR concentrations, S-phase > 7% and S-phase >14% and lower N+>10 percentages and aneuploidy. They were also more frequently CD44v6+. The same results were observed when the positivity of the progesterone receptors was considered.

CONCLUSIONS

The above results lead us to consider that the positivity for pS2 in ER- IDC is associated with hormone-dependent parameters, good differentiation and lower cellular proliferation, which can explain a better clinical outcome.

Association of in vitro invasiveness and gene expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, pS2 and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in human breast cancer cell lines

The invasive potential of tumor cells is usually tested either by in vitro invasion assays which evaluate cell spreading ability in basement membrane-like matrices or by in vivo invasion assays in nude mice. Both methods are laborious and time-consuming. Tumor invasiveness is accompanied by the changes in expression of various genes. The invasive behavior of cells is therefore represented by certain gene expression patterns. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether expression patterns of several genes are characteristic for the invasiveness of cultured cells. We examined the mRNA levels of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), estrogen inducible pS2 and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) in 23 cell lines derived from benign and malignant breast tissues using a competitive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (cRT-PCR) system. We also evaluated the invasiveness of these cell lines by their ability to penetrate into a collagen-fibroblast matrix. We demonstrate that the gene expression pattern of breast cell lines is clearly associated with their in vitro invasiveness. In general, cells with ER, PR, pS2 but no PAI-1 expression showed a non-invasive phenotype, while cells expressing PAI-1 mRNA but not ER mRNA are invasive. Our study indicates that the invasiveness of breast cancer cell lines is characterized by PAI-1 gene expression and the lack of ER mRNA. This suggests that PAI-1 may participate in the invasive process.

Modulation of the estrogen-regulated proteins cathepsin D and pS2 by opioid agonists in hormone-sensitive breast cancer cell lines (MCF7 and T47D): evidence for an interaction between the two systems

In many cancer cell lines, including breast, prostate, lung, brain, head and neck, retina, and the gastrointestinal tract, opioids decrease cell proliferation in a dose-dependent and reversible manner. Opioid and/or other neuropeptide receptors mediate this decrease. We report that only the steroid-hormone-sensitive cell lines MCF7 and T47D respond to opioid growth inhibition in a dose-dependent manner. Therefore, an interaction of the opioid and steroid receptor system might exist, as is the case with insulin. To investigate this interaction, we have assayed two estrogen-inducible proteins (pS2 and the lysosomal enzyme cathepsin D) in MCF7 and T47D cells. When cells were grown in the presence of FBS (in which case a minimal quantity of estrogens and/or opioids is provided by the serum), we observed either no effect of etorphine or ethylketocyclazocine (EKC) or an increase of secretion and/or production of pS2 and cathepsin D. However, when cells were cultured in charcoal-stripped serum and in the absence of phenol red, the effect of the two opioids is different: EKC decreased the production and/or secretion of pS2 and cathepsin D, whereas etorphine increased their synthesis and/or secretion. The differential effect of the two general opioids was attributed to their different receptor selectivity. Furthermore, the variations of the ratio of secreted/produced protein and the use of cycloheximide indicate that opioids selectively modify the regulatory pathway of each protein discretely. In conclusion, through the interaction with opioid and perhaps other membrane-receptor sites, opioid agonists modify in a dose-dependent manner the production and the secretion of two estrogen-regulated proteins. Opioids may therefore disturb hormonal signals mediated by the estrogen receptors. Hence, these chemicals may have potential endocrine disrupting activities.

Expression of pS2, c-erbB-2, and cathepsin D during the menstrual cycle in human breast cancers

BACKGROUND

Many studies have addressed the effect of the timing of surgery for breast cancer relative to menstrual cycle phase, with conflicting results. Explanations for the possibility that survival could be altered by the appropriate timing of breast cancer surgery in humans remain speculative.

METHODS

We examined the expression of three estrogen related proteins (c-erbB-2, cathepsin D, pS2) in the breast tumors from 69 premenopausal women sampled in different phases of the menstrual cycle. Data on S-phase fraction and hormone receptor expression were also analyzed. Immunohistochemical assays were used to measure the proteins of interest. S-phase fraction was determined by flow cytometry. Analyses were performed based on fraction of cells staining positive for the protein, density of stain, and a histoscore that combined both fraction of positive cells and density.

RESULTS

We found no differences in c-erbB-2, cathepsin D, hormone receptor, or S-phase levels in tumors sampled in the follicular versus luteal phase, or perimenstrual versus periovulatory phase. The exception was pS2, which was expressed at greater levels during the luteal than during the follicular phase of the cycle (p < 0.01); but there was no difference in pS2 expression when the patients were classified as periovulatory versus perimenstrual.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings do not support a variation in c-erbB-2, cathepsin D, S-phase fraction, or receptor expression as an explanation for the differences in breast cancer prognosis when surgery is timed by menstrual cycle phase. The finding that pS2 (an indicator of hormone sensitivity, and possibly better prognosis) is expressed at higher levels in tumor samples during the luteal phase suggests that the biologic profile of breast tumors may vary with the menstrual cycle and that these variations deserve further study.