Epidemiology of distal radius fractures in children and adults during the COVID-19 pandemic - a two-center study

[Treatment reality of distal radius fractures in a center]

Distal radius fractures are the third most common type of fracture in Germany after fractures of the femoral neck and peritrochanteric femoral fractures. In 2019 a total of 72,087 cases were registered with an incidence of 106 cases per 100,000 inhabitants (81,570 fractures of the femoral neck, 73,785 peritrochanteric fractures). Many of these fractures are surgically treated also in this hospital but with controversial views on the optimal treatment. Against the background of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, disappearing personnel resources and the political pressure to form centers and a switch to outpatient treatment, the authors ask the question what the treatment reality in this hospital looks like and whether the general changes in the framework conditions also have an affect in this context. This is not a strictly scientific study but a stocktaking without any claims of completeness and the retrospective evaluation of a larger data pool with all its weaknesses. On the contrary, the data provide interesting aspects that are explained in detail in the individual sections.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on maxillofacial trauma surgery in Germany - implications from the national DRG database

PURPOSE

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the personal and social lives of millions of people and also impacted the etiological factors of midfacial trauma such as falls, interpersonal violence or traffic accidents. The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on maxillofacial trauma surgery in the German healthcare system.

METHODS

Nationwide data regarding the national diagnosis-related-group (DRG) inpatient billing system used in all German hospitals was received from the German Federal Statistical Office. Various trauma-associated procedures of the Operation and Procedure Classification System (OPS), a German modification of the International Classification of Medical Procedures (ICPM), were statistically associated with different epidemiological factors between 2012 and 2021.

RESULTS

A statistically significant decrease (p < 0.05) in surgeries regarding maxillofacial fractures was registered during the years 2020 and 2021. Young male patients had the largest decline in maxillofacial trauma surgeries during this period (p < 0.05). In contrast. elderly patients 80 years and older showed a dramatic increase in the frequency of fractures in both the midface and the mandible (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

During the COVID 19 pandemic there has been a shift in the number, composition and etiology of maxillofacial fracture surgeries. Measures of social distancing and personal risk avoidance had a societal positive effect on the frequency of facial injuries. This stands in contrast to the drastic increase in fractures of elderly people who should be protected primarily by the measures taken. These results can help to understand these influences better in future pandemics.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register No: DRKS00032778.

Influence of COVID-19 pandemic on hospitalisations at a paediatric traumatology department during 2020: a single-centre observational study and comprehensive literature review

PURPOSE

The study investigates changes in the injury characteristics of hospitalised children in a paediatric trauma centre during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

Data from injured children from the pre-pandemic year 2019 were compared to the pandemic year 2020 using Pearson's chi-squared test and the Mann-Whitney U test. The period of highly restrictive regulations (HRP) was evaluated separately. A comprehensive literature review with defined search terms resulted in a descriptive data synthesis.

RESULTS

Data from 865 patients indicated reductions in admissions of 5.6% and 54.4% during the HRP. In 2020, the hospitalisation time was longer (2.2 ± 2.7 days in 2019 vs. 2.4 ± 2.6 in 2020, p = 0.045); the proportions of wounds requiring surgical therapy (p = 0.008) and of observational treatments, primarily for mild brain injuries (p = 0.046), were higher; and conservative treatments, primarily for contusions, were lower (p = 0.005). There were no significant changes in age, location of lesions, or frequency of surgical therapy; nor were there differences in the HRP, except for fewer injuries in school and kindergarten (p < 0.001). The literature review summarises the main results of 79 studies.

CONCLUSION

Limited resources did not alter the indications for surgical therapy. Further studies should examine whether the more common injuries sustained at home were caused by excessive work/childcare demands on parents. Reduced inpatient conservative treatment implies that hospital resources possibly were overused previously. The literature offers answers to many detailed questions regarding childhood injuries during a pandemic and more efficient safe treatment. Registration Ethical committee of RWTH Aachen University EK 22-320; Center for Translational & Clinical Research RWTH Aachen University (CTC-A) 21-430.

Trends and projection of forearm fractures including elbow fractures of the Olecranon in Sweden: an analysis of 363 968 fractures using public aggregated data

BACKGROUND

Forearm and olecranon fractures are a common orthopaedic injury. This study aimed to analyse whether the incidence of forearm injury is changing and identifying trends in the number of forearm and olecranon fractures using public aggregated data in Sweden.

METHODS

The number of forearm and olecranon fractures as defined by the number of registered diagnoses with the ICD-10 code of S52 were collected and normalized per 100,000 inhabitants and stratified per sex, age, and month. Age-adjusted incidence for forearm and olecranon fractures were calculated using the direct method. Poisson regression was used to analyse monthly, seasonal and yearly change in forearm and olecranon fracture incidence. Logistical regression was used to predict future trends of forearm and olecranon fractures.

RESULTS

The findings revealed a slight decreasing trend in forearm and olecranon fractures. The average incidence rate during the study period was 333 with women having a higher incidence rate than men. More fractures occurred in the winter months. Fluctuations in the number of forearm and olecranon fractures were observed during 2020 which may be influenced by the COVID-19 pandemic. Based on current data, forearm and olecranon fractures are expected to decrease in Sweden by 2035.

CONCLUSION

This study describes the trend of forearm and olecranon fractures among individuals according to sex and age in Sweden using easily obtainable data. Trends in forearm and olecranon fractures are dependent on sex and age but generally show a decreasing trend. More precise studies are needed in order to properly quantify the specific incidence of various subtypes of forearm and olecranon fractures and associated risk factors.

Anatomic Risks with Overpenetration of the Volar Locking Plates' Proximal Holes

Background  Volar locking plate fixation (VLP) is commonly used to treat distal radius fractures (DRF). Risk of dorsal compartment injury with distal screw hole fixation has been studied; however, the risk with proximal screw hole fixation is not well studied. Purpose  The goal of this study was to investigate the risk of dorsal structure injury from the screw holes proximal to the two distal rows. Methods  Nine cadaveric forearms were used. After volar distal radius exposure, a long VLP was applied. Kirschner wires were placed through the most proximal holes into the dorsal compartments. The extensor structures penetrated were noted and tagged with hemoclips. The distance from the dorsal cortex to the structures was measured. Results  The abductor pollicis longus (APL) and extensor pollicis brevis (EPB) muscle bodies were only penetrated; no tendons were penetrated. Proportion of muscle penetration increased with the more proximal screw holes. EPB was more likely to be penetrated distally and APL proximally; both were injured at holes 2 and 3. The extensors were 2 mm from the dorsal cortex of the radius on average; this did not decrease with compression of the forearm. Conclusions  This is the first study to examine the anatomic risk of extensor structure injury with VLP proximal screw hole penetration. No extensor tendons were penetrated by these proximal screw holes; first dorsal compartment muscle bellies may be irritated with overpenetration. Our findings suggest that proximal VLP screws do not need to be downsized if they are not over 2 mm prominent.

Trends in Orthopedic Management of Distal Radius Fractures Among Medicare Beneficiaries From 2019 to 2020: A Claims Analysis

Purpose

Radius and ulna fractures are among the most common fractures. These fractures are managed through operative or nonsurgical treatment, with varying implications in terms of cost and functional outcome. There are few studies that robustly characterize the management of distal radius fractures (DRFs) in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, this has not been studied among the Medicare patient population, who are particularly vulnerable to fragility fractures and COVID-19. The purpose of this study is to analyze the services provided to Medicare beneficiaries both before and during the COVID-19 pandemic to determine how procedure volume was affected in this patient population.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed services using the physician or supplier procedure summary data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. All services provided by physicians between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020, were included. The data were stratified by US census region using insurance carrier number and pricing locality codes. We also compared data between states that maintained governors affiliated with the Democratic or Republican parties for the duration of the study.

Results

There was an overall decrease in claims regarding DRFs management from 2019 to 2020. There was a dramatic decline in procedure volume (-6.3% vs -12.9%). Of all distal radius related claims there was a relative increase in the proportion of operatively managed DRFs in 2020, from 50.2% to 52.0%. The Midwest saw the greatest decline in operatively managed DRFs, whereas the West experienced the smallest per-capita decline across all procedures. After separating the data by party affiliation, it was also found that operative and nonsurgical procedure volumes fell more sharply in states with Democratic governors.

Conclusions

This study shows a decrease in DRF procedural volume among Medicare beneficiaries. This data suggests that the operative and nonsurgical management of DRFs may have been affected by pandemic factors such as quarantine guidelines and supply chain or resource limitations. This may assist surgeons and health care systems in predicting how similar crises may affect operative volume.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic IV.

Functional recovery after reduced pediatric fractures of the forearm with respect to perceived limitations, common post-traumatic symptoms, range of motion, and dexterity: a prospective study

PURPOSE

Studies on functional recovery after pediatric forearm fractures are scarce. Outcome measures are usually (retrospectively) incorporated to compare treatments. How these parameters recover has only rarely fallen within the scope. Aim was to provide insight into "normal recovery" by evaluating how limitations, post-traumatic symptoms, range of motion (ROM) and dexterity recuperate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prospective observational study regarding children 4 and 18 years with a reduced forearm fracture. Limitations, post-traumatic symptoms, ROM, and dexterity were evaluated 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months post-trauma. ROM of the unaffected side was used as a baseline.

RESULTS

Of 54 participants 25.9% and 5.9% perceived limitations after 3 respectively 6 months. Pain, swelling and hypertrichosis were common symptoms. Movements distal from the elbow were restrained 6 weeks post-trauma. Supination and palmar flexion were most affected, followed by dorsal flexion and pronation. Palmar flexion and pronation were still affected after 3 months and associated with treatment invasiveness. Dexterity was diminished at 6 weeks only.

CONCLUSIONS

Mild limitations are common. Further investigation of the association between pain, reduced sensitivity and hypertrichosis with treatment invasiveness is warranted. Regarding ROM supination, pronation, palmar and dorsal flexion should be incorporated in future studies. Dexterity is an unsuitable outcome measure.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThis study relates to monitoring recovery from pediatric forearm fractures.Physicians ought to realize that one in four children experience limitations preceding 3 months post-trauma, in which case involvement of a hand therapist should be considered.Pain, swelling and especially hypertrichosis are common post-traumatic symptoms in children and should on itself not immediately raise concerns for complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS).To assess recovery of range of motion measuring pronation, supination, dorsal, and palmar flexion is sufficient.

Outcome Analysis of Adult Distal Radius Fractures Managed during COVID-19 Pandemic

Introduction

COVID-19 pandemic created extreme pressure situation on health care services across the globe with shortage of medical staff and beds. The management of fragility fracture also affected significantly. The distal radius fractures (DRFs) are one of the common frailty fractures. There was a significant shift in the treatment of such injuries with new guidelines leaning toward more of non-operative management.

Case Report

A retrospective cross-sectional study of DRFs (DRF) treated during COVID pandemic for a period of 1 year in the United Kingdom. This included all radiologically confirmed cases of DRFs with isolated adult injuries excluding polytrauma, same limb other injuries, associated neurovascular injuries, and age below 18 years. All patient's data were collected from hospital records retrospectively from April 2020 to March 2021. There were a total of 179 patients with distal radius fracture, of which 141 (78.8%) were females and 38 (21.2%) males. The mean age was 68.2 years (SD 68.20 ± 15.63) and there were greater number of patients with intra-articular fracture. There were 28.5% (Grades 1 and 2, Group I) extra-articular fractures; 69.8% (Grades 3-8, Group II) were intra-articular fractures and 3 Barton's fractures (Group III) accounted to 1.7%. 137 patients were (76.5%) treated to non-operatively and 42 (23.5%) were treated surgically. 135 (75.4%) patients had good and 43 (24%) satisfactory clinical outcomes. 3 (1.6%) patients required osteotomy for malunited fractures. Fracture grade I and II is significantly associated with non-operative procedure (100.0% vs 84.3%) with P < 0.001.

Conclusion

This study confirmed that non-operative treatment is still a good option even in intra-articular fractures. Surgical fixation should be considered in young patients and those with higher grade of fracture classification and greater angulation at presentation. A virtual physiotherapy is still a good option.

Safety and Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine Supraclavicular Nerve Blocks in Open Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures: A Perioperative Pain Management Protocol

INTRODUCTION

Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are common fractures requiring surgical fixation. The literature varies regarding opioid prescribing habits, opioid consumption, and postoperative pain scores. We hypothesized that the preoperative administration of a liposomal bupivacaine (LB) supraclavicular nerve block would be safe and effective in controlling postoperative pain.

METHODS

A standardized pain management protocol was implemented at a single institution from July 2021 to March 2022 for patients undergoing open reduction internal fixation of DRF. Protocol elements included a preoperative LB supraclavicular nerve block and a multimodal postoperative pain regimen. Primary clinical outcomes included postoperative pain scores and number of opioid tablets consumed.

RESULTS

Twenty patients underwent a newly implemented protocol. The average age was 56 years. Mean number of oxycodone 5-mg tablets consumed was 4.1 (median, 2.5), and mean visual analog scale pain score at first postoperative appointment was 2.8. There were no incidences of missed acute carpal tunnel postoperatively. When compared with an institutional historical control (n = 189), number of opioid pills prescribed was reduced by 60% (21.4 vs 8.6 tablets, P < 0.0001), and no patients had unscheduled health care contact because of uncontrolled pain (22% vs 0%, P < 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

Liposomal bupivacaine supraclavicular nerve blocks are safe and effective in the treatment of postoperative pain after open reduction internal fixation of DRF. Patients consumed <5 oxycodone tablets on average, which is less than many recommend prescribed quantities (>20-30 tablets). Patients had low pain scores (2.8/10) at the first postoperative follow-up. To our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating the utility of LB in this clinical setting.

New Injury Patterns in Pediatric Supracondylar Fractures During COVID-19: Beds Are the New Monkey Bars

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic drastically altered children's activity patterns. Our goal was to investigate how COVID-19 affected demographics, injury characteristics, treatment patterns, follow-up, and outcomes in pediatric supracondylar humerus (SCH) fractures.

METHODS

This was an Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective analysis of patients undergoing surgery for a SCH fracture from May to November 2019 (pre-COVID-19) and from May to November 2020 (during COVID-19) at 2 tertiary children's hospitals. Demographic information, injury characteristics, hospital course, and follow-up data were collected and compared.

RESULTS

SCH fractures decreased by >50% from 2019 (149) to 2020 (72). Children in the 2020 cohort were younger (mean 5.2 y old) compared with 2019 (6.0 y old) ( P =0.019). Mechanism of injury was significantly different in 2020 ( P <0.001), as the proportion of trampoline and furniture fractures increased from 8% and 17% to 15% and 33%, respectively. The proportion of playground and monkey bar fractures decreased from 20% and 17% to 3% and 4%, respectively. Distribution of Gartland type and neurovascular injury rates were similar in 2019 and 2020 ( P =0.411 and 0.538). Time from emergency department admission to the operating room and duration of hospital admission were both unchanged from 2019 to 2020 ( P =0.864 and 0.363). The duration of postoperative follow-up in 2019 was 94.5 days compared with 72.8 days in 2020 ( P =0.122), as more pandemic patients were lost to follow up (22.5% vs. 35.2%, P =0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

The demographics, mechanism of injury, and follow-up practices of pediatric SCH fractures changed significantly during the pandemic, likely because of school closures and lock-downs changing activity patterns. Different mechanisms of injury affected younger patients and reflected the new ways children played. Trampoline-related and furniture-related injuries overtook the classic playground falls as primary mechanism of injury. Despite the need for COVID-19 testing, there was no delay in time to the operating room. Hospitalization duration did not change, yet postoperative follow-up was shorter, and more patients were lost to follow up. Despite these stressors, outcomes remained excellent in most children.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-Retrospective comparative study.

The "COVID-19 Approach" to Distal Radius Fracture Management

Background  In response to the coronavirus pandemic the British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOAST) guidelines advised treating distal radius fractures (DRFs) non-operatively where possible. Questions/Purpose  The aim of this study was to assess whether the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic lockdown within the United Kingdom did alter the management of DRFs and whether there was any subsequent change in patient outcome or complication rate. Patients and Methods  A retrospective cohort study was performed at a single orthopaedic center within the United Kingdom. The cohort of patients presenting with DRFs during the first lockdown was identified through the virtual fracture clinic database. The cohort of patients from the previous year was also identified for comparison. Data was collected on patient demographics, radiological features of the fractures, management, patient outcome and subsequent complications. Comparisons were then made between the cohorts for each year. Results  The pre-COVID cohort had a significantly higher number of patients reviewed in face-to-face clinic appointments ( p  = 0.0044) and the mean number of clinic appointments for those patients was significantly higher ( p  = 0.0149). There was no significant difference between the cohorts regarding patient complications or any need for return to theater with a minimum 10 month follow-up period. Conclusion  Despite comparative numbers and patterns of DRFs as well as no significant difference in the number of injuries requiring orthopaedic intervention, the burden on fracture clinic services was significantly reduced during the COVID pandemic. Encouragingly, this reduction in follow-up has not translated into an increased prevalence of complications or requirement for further surgery. Level of Evidence  The level of evidence of the study is level III.

VOLCON: a randomized controlled trial investigating complications and functional outcome of volar plating vs casting of unstable distal radius fractures in patients older than 65 years

BACKGROUND

Primary aim: to compare complications of operative vs non-operative treatment of unstable distal radius fractures (DRF) fulfilling national clinical guidelines for operative treatment. Secondary aim: to compare the functional outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-centre randomized controlled trial of unstable DRF. 50 patients: volar locking plate, 2 weeks casting + 3 weeks orthosis. 50 patients: 5 weeks casting.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

complications assessed after 2 and 5 weeks and 6 and 12 months.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

Quick-DASH, PRWHE, range of motion, grip strength, EQ-5D-3L.

RESULTS

148 patients were screened from November 2019 to March 2021. 48 patients did not want to participate or were unable to participate in the follow-up. 100 patients were randomized and 85 patients were available for full analysis due to there being 4 deaths, 6 withdrawals, 1 wrong inclusion, 1 emigration, 1 refracture, 1 patient with compartment syndrome, and 1 who was advised to undergo surgery after being randomized to non-operative treatment. Median age was 74 years (range 65-92), 81 women/19 men, 42 right/58 left side, 87 retired, 11 smokers, 86 ASA class 1 or 2. Complication rates did not statistical significantly vary between the operative and non-operative group: 20.9% (9/43) vs 16.6% (7/42), p = 0.78 (Fisher's exact test). Complications were driven by sensory disturbances. Four reoperations were performed: two in the non-operative group: carpal tunnel syndrome; two in the operative group: one carpal tunnel syndrome, one protruding screw causing extensor tendon irritation. Mean difference in Quick-DASH varied from 2.3 (95% CI - 3 to 8) pre-injury to 4.2 (- 4 to 12) at 12 months. Quick-DASH and PRWHE were neither statistically nor clinically-relevant different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Complication rates after operative and non-operative treatment of DRF were similar. Volar plating did not improve the functional outcome after 5 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months. These findings are in line with recent RCTs and mandate a revision of guidelines towards more conservative treatment.

TAKE HOME MESSAGES

(1) consider non-operative treatment in elderly patients sustaining unstable DRFs; (2) choosing operative treatment in patients older than 65 years should not be the gold standard; (3) however, non-operative treatment still carries a risk for complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03716661, registered 23rd Oct 2018; Published protocol PMC6599306.

Types, management and complications in paediatric distal radial fractures sustained during COVID-19 lockdown

In response to the coronavirus pandemic the British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOAST) guidelines advised treating distal radial fractures non-operatively where possible. A cohort was studied retrospectively to assess whether the COVID pandemic lockdown within the UK altered types, the management and complications of paediatric distal radial fractures. The cohort studied comprised of 194 paediatric distal radial fractures in the pre-COVID cohort and 101 fractures in the COVID cohort. There was no significant differences in the type of fractures in the two cohorts. Significantly more high energy injuries were sustained among the COVID cohort than the pre-COVID (p < 0.001). The COVID cohort had significantly more patients managed in cast (p < 0.001) and significantly more managed with K-wire fixation (p = 0.049). The COVID cohort had significantly more complications (p = 0.016) at minimum 10-month follow-up. The results suggest that treatment of paediatric distal radial fractures during lockdown was too conservative and subsequent complications may put additional strain on orthopaedic services.Level of evidence: IV.

COVID-19 pandemic restrictions unmasks dangers of frequent injury mechanisms for common surgically treated pediatric fractures

PURPOSE

This study examined the volume and characteristics of common surgically treated fractures in children during the COVID-19 pandemic. The worldwide spread of COVID-19 affected the society in numerous ways. Social distancing led to changes in the types of activities performed by individuals, including children. Physicians saw a shift in orthopedic trauma volume and distribution. We predicted that with the change in activities children participated in, the number or type of injuries sustained would change as well.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of children who sustained a surgically treated fracture of the forearm, supracondylar humerus, femur, or any open fracture during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the previous 2 years (pre-pandemic). Patient demographics, insurance status, and mechanism of injury were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Review of the medical records identified 791 children. The number of fractures decreased from an average of 295 per year pre-pandemic to 201 during the pandemic (p = 0.09). During the pandemic, there was a decrease in injuries resulting from a fall from the monkey bars for supracondylar humerus (21.2% to 8.2%, p < 0.01) and for forearm fractures (15.5% to 4.3%, p = 0.04). In contrast, the frequencies of falls from a skateboard, hoverboard, scooter, or bicycle and falls from household furniture increased during the pandemic.

CONCLUSION

The observed decrease in monkey bar-related injuries provides further evidence as to the dangers of this piece of playground equipment in contributing to upper-extremity fractures in children.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III: Prognostic and Epidemiological.

One year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland-the incidence of osteoporotic forearm, arm, and hip fractures

The study attempts to analyse whether the COVID-19 pandemic affected the incidence of forearm, arm, and hip fractures during a 1-year observation period. Additionally, changes in the overall treatment costs of those fractures were estimated. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the incidence of forearm, arm, and hip fractures remained statistically unchanged, neither were any significant changes observed in the expenditure, incurred for the treatment of the fracture cases.

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to find out and evaluate if the consequences of COVID-19 pandemic (including lockdown and the fear of infection) influenced the incidence of osteoporotic forearm, arm, and hip fractures and to estimate the changes in the costs of their management during one-year observation period.

METHODS

The incidence of forearm, arm, and hip fractures was collected for the population, aged ≥ 50, residing at the district of Tarnowskie Góry and the Town of Piekary Śląskie, Poland, during 1 year of COVID-19 pandemic (from March 16th 2020 to March 15th 2021). The obtained results were compared with the number of corresponding limb fractures, recorded before the pandemic during five consecutive yearly periods, each starting from 16th March and ending on the 15th March of a subsequent year, the entire period covering the years 2015-2020. The rates of the analysed fractures were calculated per 100,000 inhabitants together with their economic impact.

RESULTS

The mean numbers and the incidence rates of upper extremity fractures were slightly lower during the COVID-19 pandemic than in the previous 5 years, whereas hip fracture figures remained almost stable. The observed changes were not statistically significant. That annual observation revealed a slight decrease in expenditure volumes, when compared to the analysed period before the pandemic (-0.33%).

CONCLUSION

The decreased incidence rate of forearm, arm, and hip fractures, observed during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic, was not statistically significant in the 1-year observation. After several weeks/months under the shock, caused by government limitations and the fear of infection, the number of patients remained unchanged during the one-year observation.

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Most Common Diagnoses in Pediatric Surgery: Abdominal Pain, Acute Scrotum, Upper and Lower Extremity Injuries-Tertiary Center Experience

OBJECTIVE

The coronavirus disease-19 pandemic has brought new patterns of behavior among patients and their parents. The reorganization of the health care system has reduced the number of elective surgical procedures in Croatia. In our study, we were interested in whether the pandemic has caused a statistically significant decrease in the number of examinations of children in the emergency department according to the most common diagnoses in pediatric surgery and whether there was a decrease in the number of emergency surgeries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from the Hospital Information System. The analysis included 15 months of the pre-coronavirus disease-19 period and 15 months of the coronavirus disease-19 period. The primary outcome of the study was to determine the cumulative number of all examinations and then to determine the number of examinations according to the most common diagnoses and, consequently, to determine whether there was a statistically significant decrease. The secondary outcome was to determine the cumulative number of all operations and then to determine the number of the most common emergency operations and, consequently, to see if there was a statistically significant decrease.

RESULTS

In the 15 months of the pre- coronavirus disease-19 period, a total of 33 646 children were examined in the emergency department, while in the coronavirus disease-19 period, 26 831 were examined (P = .010). Although a decrease was recorded in all categories, a statistically significant decrease was recorded for diagnoses of abdominal pain (P = .007) and lower extremity injuries (P = .014). The total number of operations, due to strict measures and reduction of the elective program, decreased statistically significantly in the coronavirus disease-19 period (P < .0001). The number of most common emergency operations did not decrease statistically significantly.

CONCLUSION

This study represents the first longer, 15-month experience of a pandemic in the only and largest children's hospital in Croatia. There is no doubt that coronavirus disease-19 had the effect of reducing the number of examinations in the emergency department for all the most common diagnoses, but the number of operations did not change significantly.

Epidemiology of Paediatric Orthopaedic Trauma, Before, During, and After the Outbreak of COVID-19 Pandemic: An Observational Study From a Tertiary Referral Center in Wales

Introduction

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and the resultant lockdown has had a great impact on global healthcare. This observational study aimed to analyse the consequences of national lockdown on the epidemiology of significant paediatric orthopaedic trauma, presenting to a tertiary referral centre in Wales, during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom.

Methods

Paediatric patients presenting with orthopaedic trauma, from March 2019 to July 2019 (baseline period), March 2020 to July 2020 (lockdown period), and March 2021 to July 2021 (post lockdown period), were identified and compared. Those aged less than 16 years, presenting with a significant orthopaedic injury, defined here for the study as, those requiring either manipulation under anaesthesia or, surgical intervention were included in this study.

Results

Mean age of children with significant orthopaedic injuries during the lockdown dropped significantly to 6.52 years in comparison to those during the baseline period (7.9 years), and post lockdown period (8.85 years). The incidence of outdoor injuries plummeted significantly from 64.71% in the baseline period, to 41.27% during the lockdown period, but rose to 80.65% in the post lockdown period. There was a 48% reduction in the number of children who required intervention in operating theatre during the lockdown period, in comparison to the other two study periods.

Conclusion

Our study reports a significant decrease in the incidence of paediatric orthopaedic trauma needing intervention in operating theatre during the lockdown period, with a significant rise in the incidence of domestic injuries, and relatively younger children sustaining these injuries. A public information campaign could help reduce the incidence of such domestic accidents during future lockdowns. We recommend improving awareness among parents, creating a safe indoor as well as outdoor environment to help reduce the incidence of fractures in the paediatric population. This will subsequently help in reducing the financial burden on an already stretched healthcare system.