Combining accurate tumor genome simulation with crowdsourcing to benchmark somatic structural variant detection

Variant calling and benchmarking in an era of complete human genome sequences

Genetic variant calling from DNA sequencing has enabled understanding of germline variation in hundreds of thousands of humans. Sequencing technologies and variant-calling methods have advanced rapidly, routinely providing reliable variant calls in most of the human genome. We describe how advances in long reads, deep learning, de novo assembly and pangenomes have expanded access to variant calls in increasingly challenging, repetitive genomic regions, including medically relevant regions, and how new benchmark sets and benchmarking methods illuminate their strengths and limitations. Finally, we explore the possible future of more complete characterization of human genome variation in light of the recent completion of a telomere-to-telomere human genome reference assembly and human pangenomes, and we consider the innovations needed to benchmark their newly accessible repetitive regions and complex variants.

ConanVarvar: a versatile tool for the detection of large syndromic copy number variation from whole-genome sequencing data

BACKGROUND

A wide range of tools are available for the detection of copy number variants (CNVs) from whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data. However, none of them focus on clinically-relevant CNVs, such as those that are associated with known genetic syndromes. Such variants are often large in size, typically 1-5 Mb, but currently available CNV callers have been developed and benchmarked for the discovery of smaller variants. Thus, the ability of these programs to detect tens of real syndromic CNVs remains largely unknown.

RESULTS

Here we present ConanVarvar, a tool which implements a complete workflow for the targeted analysis of large germline CNVs from WGS data. ConanVarvar comes with an intuitive R Shiny graphical user interface and annotates identified variants with information about 56 associated syndromic conditions. We benchmarked ConanVarvar and four other programs on a dataset containing real and simulated syndromic CNVs larger than 1 Mb. In comparison to other tools, ConanVarvar reports 10-30 times less false-positive variants without compromising sensitivity and is quicker to run, especially on large batches of samples.

CONCLUSIONS

ConanVarvar is a useful instrument for primary analysis in disease sequencing studies, where large CNVs could be the cause of disease.

Structural variant analysis of a cancer reference cell line sample using multiple sequencing technologies

BACKGROUND

The cancer genome is commonly altered with thousands of structural rearrangements including insertions, deletions, translocation, inversions, duplications, and copy number variations. Thus, structural variant (SV) characterization plays a paramount role in cancer target identification, oncology diagnostics, and personalized medicine. As part of the SEQC2 Consortium effort, the present study established and evaluated a consensus SV call set using a breast cancer reference cell line and matched normal control derived from the same donor, which were used in our companion benchmarking studies as reference samples.

RESULTS

We systematically investigated somatic SVs in the reference cancer cell line by comparing to a matched normal cell line using multiple NGS platforms including Illumina short-read, 10X Genomics linked reads, PacBio long reads, Oxford Nanopore long reads, and high-throughput chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C). We established a consensus SV call set of a total of 1788 SVs including 717 deletions, 230 duplications, 551 insertions, 133 inversions, 146 translocations, and 11 breakends for the reference cancer cell line. To independently evaluate and cross-validate the accuracy of our consensus SV call set, we used orthogonal methods including PCR-based validation, Affymetrix arrays, Bionano optical mapping, and identification of fusion genes detected from RNA-seq. We evaluated the strengths and weaknesses of each NGS technology for SV determination, and our findings provide an actionable guide to improve cancer genome SV detection sensitivity and accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

A high-confidence consensus SV call set was established for the reference cancer cell line. A large subset of the variants identified was validated by multiple orthogonal methods.

Personalized genome assembly for accurate cancer somatic mutation discovery using tumor-normal paired reference samples

BACKGROUND

The use of a personalized haplotype-specific genome assembly, rather than an unrelated, mosaic genome like GRCh38, as a reference for detecting the full spectrum of somatic events from cancers has long been advocated but has never been explored in tumor-normal paired samples. Here, we provide the first demonstrated use of de novo assembled personalized genome as a reference for cancer mutation detection and quantifying the effects of the reference genomes on the accuracy of somatic mutation detection.

RESULTS

We generate de novo assemblies of the first tumor-normal paired genomes, both nuclear and mitochondrial, derived from the same individual with triple negative breast cancer. The personalized genome was chromosomal scale, haplotype phased, and annotated. We demonstrate that it provides individual specific haplotypes for complex regions and medically relevant genes. We illustrate that the personalized genome reference not only improves read alignments for both short-read and long-read sequencing data but also ameliorates the detection accuracy of somatic SNVs and SVs. We identify the equivalent somatic mutation calls between two genome references and uncover novel somatic mutations only when personalized genome assembly is used as a reference.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate that use of a personalized genome with individual-specific haplotypes is essential for accurate detection of the full spectrum of somatic mutations in the paired tumor-normal samples. The unique resource and methodology established in this study will be beneficial to the development of precision oncology medicine not only for breast cancer, but also for other cancers.

A multi-platform reference for somatic structural variation detection

Accurate detection of somatic structural variation (SV) in cancer genomes remains a challenging problem. This is in part due to the lack of high-quality, gold-standard datasets that enable the benchmarking of experimental approaches and bioinformatic analysis pipelines. Here, we performed somatic SV analysis of the paired melanoma and normal lymphoblastoid COLO829 cell lines using four different sequencing technologies. Based on the evidence from multiple technologies combined with extensive experimental validation, we compiled a comprehensive set of carefully curated and validated somatic SVs, comprising all SV types. We demonstrate the utility of this resource by determining the SV detection performance as a function of tumor purity and sequence depth, highlighting the importance of assessing these parameters in cancer genomics projects. The truth somatic SV dataset as well as the underlying raw multi-platform sequencing data are freely available and are an important resource for community somatic benchmarking efforts.

PrecisionFDA Truth Challenge V2: Calling variants from short and long reads in difficult-to-map regions

The precisionFDA Truth Challenge V2 aimed to assess the state of the art of variant calling in challenging genomic regions. Starting with FASTQs, 20 challenge participants applied their variant-calling pipelines and submitted 64 variant call sets for one or more sequencing technologies (Illumina, PacBio HiFi, and Oxford Nanopore Technologies). Submissions were evaluated following best practices for benchmarking small variants with updated Genome in a Bottle benchmark sets and genome stratifications. Challenge submissions included numerous innovative methods, with graph-based and machine learning methods scoring best for short-read and long-read datasets, respectively. With machine learning approaches, combining multiple sequencing technologies performed particularly well. Recent developments in sequencing and variant calling have enabled benchmarking variants in challenging genomic regions, paving the way for the identification of previously unknown clinically relevant variants.

Computational analysis of cancer genome sequencing data

Distilling biologically meaningful information from cancer genome sequencing data requires comprehensive identification of somatic alterations using rigorous computational methods. As the amount and complexity of sequencing data have increased, so has the number of tools for analysing them. Here, we describe the main steps involved in the bioinformatic analysis of cancer genomes, review key algorithmic developments and highlight popular tools and emerging technologies. These tools include those that identify point mutations, copy number alterations, structural variations and mutational signatures in cancer genomes. We also discuss issues in experimental design, the strengths and limitations of sequencing modalities and methodological challenges for the future.

Meerkat: An Algorithm to Reliably Identify Structural Variations and Predict Their Forming Mechanisms

Next-generation sequencing technologies have been widely used to query genetic variants in normal individuals as well as in those with diseases. Large-scale structural variations are a common source of genetic diversity in human population, and some of them have significant contributions to the etiology of diseases. However, the detection of large-scale structural variations from sequencing data remains challenging. Here, we describe Meerkat-an algorithm which can reliably detect structural variations from Illumina short-read sequencing data at basepair resolution. A unique feature of Meerkat is that it can infer the variant forming mechanisms based on the DNA content and features at the breakpoints.

Benchmarking pipelines for subclonal deconvolution of bulk tumour sequencing data

Intratumour heterogeneity provides tumours with the ability to adapt and acquire treatment resistance. The development of more effective and personalised treatments for cancers, therefore, requires accurate characterisation of the clonal architecture of tumours, enabling evolutionary dynamics to be tracked. Many methods exist for achieving this from bulk tumour sequencing data, involving identifying mutations and performing subclonal deconvolution, but there is a lack of systematic benchmarking to inform researchers on which are most accurate, and how dataset characteristics impact performance. To address this, we use the most comprehensive tumour genome simulation tool available for such purposes to create 80 bulk tumour whole exome sequencing datasets of differing depths, tumour complexities, and purities, and use these to benchmark subclonal deconvolution pipelines. We conclude that i) tumour complexity does not impact accuracy, ii) increasing either purity or purity-corrected sequencing depth improves accuracy, and iii) the optimal pipeline consists of Mutect2, FACETS and PyClone-VI. We have made our benchmarking datasets publicly available for future use.

Establishing community reference samples, data and call sets for benchmarking cancer mutation detection using whole-genome sequencing

The lack of samples for generating standardized DNA datasets for setting up a sequencing pipeline or benchmarking the performance of different algorithms limits the implementation and uptake of cancer genomics. Here, we describe reference call sets obtained from paired tumor-normal genomic DNA (gDNA) samples derived from a breast cancer cell line-which is highly heterogeneous, with an aneuploid genome, and enriched in somatic alterations-and a matched lymphoblastoid cell line. We partially validated both somatic mutations and germline variants in these call sets via whole-exome sequencing (WES) with different sequencing platforms and targeted sequencing with >2,000-fold coverage, spanning 82% of genomic regions with high confidence. Although the gDNA reference samples are not representative of primary cancer cells from a clinical sample, when setting up a sequencing pipeline, they not only minimize potential biases from technologies, assays and informatics but also provide a unique resource for benchmarking 'tumor-only' or 'matched tumor-normal' analyses.

A community challenge to evaluate RNA-seq, fusion detection, and isoform quantification methods for cancer discovery

The accurate identification and quantitation of RNA isoforms present in the cancer transcriptome is key for analyses ranging from the inference of the impacts of somatic variants to pathway analysis to biomarker development and subtype discovery. The ICGC-TCGA DREAM Somatic Mutation Calling in RNA (SMC-RNA) challenge was a crowd-sourced effort to benchmark methods for RNA isoform quantification and fusion detection from bulk cancer RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data. It concluded in 2018 with a comparison of 77 fusion detection entries and 65 isoform quantification entries on 51 synthetic tumors and 32 cell lines with spiked-in fusion constructs. We report the entries used to build this benchmark, the leaderboard results, and the experimental features associated with the accurate prediction of RNA species. This challenge required submissions to be in the form of containerized workflows, meaning each of the entries described is easily reusable through CWL and Docker containers at https://github.com/SMC-RNA-challenge. A record of this paper's transparent peer review process is included in the supplemental information.

The Application of Control Materials for Ongoing Quality Management of Next-Generation Sequencing in a Clinical Genetic Laboratory

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has played an important role in detecting genetic variants with pathologic and therapeutic potential. The advantages of NGS, such as high-throughput sequencing capacity and massively parallel sequencing, have a significant impact on realization of genetic profiling in clinical genetic laboratories. These changes have enabled clinicians to execute precision medicine in diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment for patients. However, to adapt targeted gene panels in diagnostic use, analytical validation and ongoing quality control should be implemented and applied with both practical guidelines and appropriate control materials. Several guidelines for NGS quality control recommend usage of control materials such as HapMap cell lines, synthetic DNA fragments, and genetically characterized cell lines; however, specifications or applications of such usage are insufficient to guideline method development. This review focuses on what factors should be considered before control material selection for NGS assay and practical methods of how they could be developed in clinical genetic laboratories. This review also provides the detailed sources of critical information related to control materials.

Best practices for variant calling in clinical sequencing

Next-generation sequencing technologies have enabled a dramatic expansion of clinical genetic testing both for inherited conditions and diseases such as cancer. Accurate variant calling in NGS data is a critical step upon which virtually all downstream analysis and interpretation processes rely. Just as NGS technologies have evolved considerably over the past 10 years, so too have the software tools and approaches for detecting sequence variants in clinical samples. In this review, I discuss the current best practices for variant calling in clinical sequencing studies, with a particular emphasis on trio sequencing for inherited disorders and somatic mutation detection in cancer patients. I describe the relative strengths and weaknesses of panel, exome, and whole-genome sequencing for variant detection. Recommended tools and strategies for calling variants of different classes are also provided, along with guidance on variant review, validation, and benchmarking to ensure optimal performance. Although NGS technologies are continually evolving, and new capabilities (such as long-read single-molecule sequencing) are emerging, the “best practice” principles in this review should be relevant to clinical variant calling in the long term.

Untangling a complex web: Computational analyses of tumor molecular profiles to decode driver mechanisms

Genome-scale studies focusing on molecular profiling of cancers across tissue types have revealed a plethora of aberrations across the genomic, transcriptomic, and epigenomic scales. The significant molecular heterogeneity across individual tumors even within the same tissue context complicates decoding the key etiologic mechanisms of this disease. Furthermore, it is increasingly likely that biologic mechanisms underlying the pathobiology of cancer involve multiple molecular entities interacting across functional scales. This has motivated the development of computational approaches that integrate molecular measurements with prior biological knowledge in increasingly intricate ways to enable the discovery of driver genomic aberrations across cancers. Here, we review diverse methodological approaches that have powered significant advances in our understanding of the genomic underpinnings of cancer at the cohort and at the individual tumor scales. We outline the key advances and challenges in the computational discovery of cancer mechanisms while motivating the development of systems biology approaches to comprehensively decode the biologic drivers of this complex disease.

On the application, reporting, and sharing of in silico simulations for genetic studies

In silico simulations play an indispensable role in the development and application of statistical models and methods for genetic studies. Simulation tools allow for the evaluation of methods and investigation of models in a controlled manner. With the growing popularity of evolutionary models and simulation‐based statistical methods, genetic simulations have been applied to a wide variety of research disciplines such as population genetics, evolutionary genetics, genetic epidemiology, ecology, and conservation biology. In this review, we surveyed 1409 articles from five journals that publish on major application areas of genetic simulations. We identified 432 papers in which genetic simulations were used and examined the targets and applications of simulation studies and how these simulation methods and simulated data sets are reported and shared. Whereas a large proportion (30%) of the surveyed articles reported the use of genetic simulations, only 28% of these genetic simulation studies used existing simulation software, 2% used existing simulated data sets, and 19% and 12% made source code and simulated data sets publicly available, respectively. Moreover, 15% of articles provided no information on how simulation studies were performed. These findings suggest a need to encourage sharing and reuse of existing simulation software and data sets, as well as providing more information regarding the performance of simulations.

Assembling and Validating Bioinformatic Pipelines for Next-Generation Sequencing Clinical Assays

CONTEXT.—

Clinical next-generation sequencing (NGS) is being rapidly adopted, but analysis and interpretation of large data sets prompt new challenges for a clinical laboratory setting. Clinical NGS results rely heavily on the bioinformatics pipeline for identifying genetic variation in complex samples. The choice of bioinformatics algorithms, genome assembly, and genetic annotation databases are important for determining genetic alterations associated with disease. The analysis methods are often tuned to the assay to maximize accuracy. Once a pipeline has been developed, it must be validated to determine accuracy and reproducibility for samples similar to real-world cases. In silico proficiency testing or institutional data exchange will ensure consistency among clinical laboratories.

OBJECTIVE.—

To provide molecular pathologists a step-by-step guide to bioinformatics analysis and validation design in order to navigate the regulatory and validation standards of implementing a bioinformatic pipeline as a part of a new clinical NGS assay.

DATA SOURCES.—

This guide uses published studies on genomic analysis, bioinformatics methods, and methods comparison studies to inform the reader on what resources, including open source software tools and databases, are available for genetic variant detection and interpretation.

CONCLUSIONS.—

This review covers 4 key concepts: (1) bioinformatic analysis design for detecting genetic variation, (2) the resources for assessing genetic effects, (3) analysis validation assessment experiments and data sets, including a diverse set of samples to mimic real-world challenges that assess accuracy and reproducibility, and (4) if concordance between clinical laboratories will be improved by proficiency testing designed to test bioinformatic pipelines.

FastClone is a probabilistic tool for deconvoluting tumor heterogeneity in bulk-sequencing samples

Dissecting tumor heterogeneity is a key to understanding the complex mechanisms underlying drug resistance in cancers. The rich literature of pioneering studies on tumor heterogeneity analysis spurred a recent community-wide benchmark study that compares diverse modeling algorithms. Here we present FastClone, a top-performing algorithm in accuracy in this benchmark. FastClone improves over existing methods by allowing the deconvolution of subclones that have independent copy number variation events within the same chromosome regions. We characterize the behavior of FastClone in identifying subclones using stage III colon cancer primary tumor samples as well as simulated data. It achieves approximately 100-fold acceleration in computation for both simulated and patient data. The efficacy of FastClone will allow its application to large-scale data and clinical data, and facilitate personalized medicine in cancers.

A Practical Guide for Structural Variation Detection in the Human Genome

Profiling genetic variants-including single nucleotide variants, small insertions and deletions, copy number variations, and structural variations (SVs)-from both healthy individuals and individuals with disease is a key component of genetic and biomedical research. SVs are large-scale changes in the genome and involve breakage and rejoining of DNA fragments. They may affect thousands to millions of nucleotides and can lead to loss, gain, and reshuffling of genes and regulatory elements. SVs are known to impact gene expression and potentially result in altered phenotypes and diseases. Therefore, identifying SVs from the human genomes is particularly important. In this review, I describe advantages and disadvantages of the available high-throughput assays for the discovery of SVs, which are the most challenging genetic alterations to detect. A practical guide is offered to suggest the most suitable strategies for discovering different types of SVs including common germline, rare, somatic, and complex variants. I also discuss factors to be considered, such as cost and performance, for different strategies when designing experiments. Last, I present several approaches to identify potential SV artifacts caused by samples, experimental procedures, and computational analysis. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Shiny-SoSV: A web-based performance calculator for somatic structural variant detection

Somatic structural variants are an important contributor to cancer development and evolution. Accurate detection of these complex variants from whole genome sequencing data is influenced by a multitude of parameters. However, there are currently no tools for guiding study design nor are there applications that could predict the performance of somatic structural variant detection. To address this gap, we developed Shiny-SoSV, a user-friendly web-based calculator for determining the impact of common variables on the sensitivity, precision and F1 score of somatic structural variant detection, including choice of variant detection tool, sequencing depth of coverage, variant allele fraction, and variant breakpoint resolution. Using simulation studies, we determined singular and combinatoric effects of these variables, modelled the results using a generalised additive model, allowing structural variant detection performance to be predicted for any combination of predictors. Shiny-SoSV provides an interactive and visual platform for users to easily compare individual and combined impact of different parameters. It predicts the performance of a proposed study design, on somatic structural variant detection, prior to the commencement of benchwork. Shiny-SoSV is freely available at https://hcpcg.shinyapps.io/Shiny-SoSV with accompanying user’s guide and example use-cases.

A robust benchmark for detection of germline large deletions and insertions

New technologies and analysis methods are enabling genomic structural variants (SVs) to be detected with ever-increasing accuracy, resolution, and comprehensiveness. To help translate these methods to routine research and clinical practice, we developed the first sequence-resolved benchmark set for identification of both false negative and false positive germline large insertions and deletions. To create this benchmark for a broadly consented son in a Personal Genome Project trio with broadly available cells and DNA, the Genome in a Bottle (GIAB) Consortium integrated 19 sequence-resolved variant calling methods from diverse technologies. The final benchmark set contains 12745 isolated, sequence-resolved insertion (7281) and deletion (5464) calls ≥50 base pairs (bp). The Tier 1 benchmark regions, for which any extra calls are putative false positives, cover 2.51 Gbp and 5262 insertions and 4095 deletions supported by ≥1 diploid assembly. We demonstrate the benchmark set reliably identifies false negatives and false positives in high-quality SV callsets from short-, linked-, and long-read sequencing and optical mapping.

Detection of somatic structural variants from short-read next-generation sequencing data

Somatic structural variants (SVs), which are variants that typically impact >50 nucleotides, play a significant role in cancer development and evolution but are notoriously more difficult to detect than small variants from short-read next-generation sequencing (NGS) data. This is due to a combination of challenges attributed to the purity of tumour samples, tumour heterogeneity, limitations of short-read information from NGS and sequence alignment ambiguities. In spite of active development of SV detection tools (callers) over the past few years, each method has inherent advantages and limitations. In this review, we highlight some of the important factors affecting somatic SV detection and compared the performance of seven commonly used SV callers. In particular, we focus on the extent of change in sensitivity and precision for detecting different SV types and size ranges from samples with differing variant allele frequencies and sequencing depths of coverage. We highlight the reasons for why some SV callers perform well in some settings but not others, allowing our evaluation findings to be extended beyond the seven SV callers examined in this paper. As the importance of large SVs become increasingly recognized in cancer genomics, this paper provides a timely review on some of the most impactful factors influencing somatic SV detection that should be considered when choosing SV callers.

Identification of Subtypes of Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Based on DNA Methylation Profiles and Integration of Transcriptome and Genome Data

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Esophageal adenocarcinomas (EACs) are heterogeneous and often preceded by Barrett's esophagus (BE). Many genomic changes have been associated with development of BE and EAC, but little is known about epigenetic alterations. We performed epigenetic analyses of BE and EAC tissues and combined these data with transcriptome and genomic data to identify mechanisms that control gene expression and genome integrity.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study, we collected tissue samples and clinical data from 150 BE and 285 EAC cases from the Oesophageal Cancer Classification and Molecular Stratification consortium in the United Kingdom. We analyzed methylation profiles of all BE and EAC tissues and assigned them to subgroups using non-negative matrix factorization with k-means clustering. Data from whole-genome sequencing and transcriptome studies were then incorporated; we performed integrative methylation and RNA-sequencing analyses to identify genes that were suppressed with increased methylation in promoter regions. Levels of different immune cell types were computed using single-sample gene set enrichment methods. We derived 8 organoids from 8 EAC tissues and tested their sensitivity to different drugs.

RESULTS

BE and EAC samples shared genome-wide methylation features, compared with normal tissues (esophageal, gastric, and duodenum; controls) from the same patients and grouped into 4 subtypes. Subtype 1 was characterized by DNA hypermethylation with a high mutation burden and multiple mutations in genes in cell cycle and receptor tyrosine signaling pathways. Subtype 2 was characterized by a gene expression pattern associated with metabolic processes (ATP synthesis and fatty acid oxidation) and lack methylation at specific binding sites for transcription factors; 83% of samples of this subtype were BE and 17% were EAC. The third subtype did not have changes in methylation pattern, compared with control tissue, but had a gene expression pattern that indicated immune cell infiltration; this tumor type was associated with the shortest time of patient survival. The fourth subtype was characterized by DNA hypomethylation associated with structure rearrangements, copy number alterations, with preferential amplification of CCNE1 (cells with this gene amplification have been reported to be sensitive to CDK2 inhibitors). Organoids with reduced levels of MGMT and CHFR expression were sensitive to temozolomide and taxane drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

In a comprehensive integrated analysis of methylation, transcriptome, and genome profiles of more than 400 BE and EAC tissues, along with clinical data, we identified 4 subtypes that were associated with patient outcomes and potential responses to therapy.

ArtiFuse-computational validation of fusion gene detection tools without relying on simulated reads

MOTIVATION

Gene fusions are an important class of transcriptional variants that can influence cancer development and can be predicted from RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data by multiple existing tools. However, the real-world performance of these tools is unclear due to the lack of known positive and negative events, especially with regard to fusion genes in individual samples. Often simulated reads are used, but these cannot account for all technical biases in RNA-seq data generated from real samples.

RESULTS

Here, we present ArtiFuse, a novel approach that simulates fusion genes by sequence modification to the genomic reference, and therefore, can be applied to any RNA-seq dataset without the need for any simulated reads. We demonstrate our approach on eight RNA-seq datasets for three fusion gene prediction tools: average recall values peak for all three tools between 0.4 and 0.56 for high-quality and high-coverage datasets. As ArtiFuse affords total control over involved genes and breakpoint position, we also assessed performance with regard to gene-related properties, showing a drop-in recall value for low-expressed genes in high-coverage samples and genes with co-expressed paralogues. Overall tool performance assessed from ArtiFusions is lower compared to previously reported estimates on simulated reads. Due to the use of real RNA-seq datasets, we believe that ArtiFuse provides a more realistic benchmark that can be used to develop more accurate fusion gene prediction tools for application in clinical settings.

AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION

ArtiFuse is implemented in Python. The source code and documentation are available at https://github.com/TRON-Bioinformatics/ArtiFusion.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

A community effort to create standards for evaluating tumor subclonal reconstruction

Tumor DNA sequencing data can be interpreted by computational methods that analyze genomic heterogeneity to infer evolutionary dynamics. A growing number of studies have used these approaches to link cancer evolution with clinical progression and response to therapy. Although the inference of tumor phylogenies is rapidly becoming standard practice in cancer genome analyses, standards for evaluating them are lacking. To address this need, we systematically assess methods for reconstructing tumor subclonality. First, we elucidate the main algorithmic problems in subclonal reconstruction and develop quantitative metrics for evaluating them. Then we simulate realistic tumor genomes that harbor all known clonal and subclonal mutation types and processes. Finally, we benchmark 580 tumor reconstructions, varying tumor read depth, tumor type and somatic variant detection. Our analysis provides a baseline for the establishment of gold-standard methods to analyze tumor heterogeneity.

Hecaton: reliably detecting copy number variation in plant genomes using short read sequencing data

Background

Copy number variation (CNV) is thought to actively contribute to adaptive evolution of plant species. While many computational algorithms are available to detect copy number variation from whole genome sequencing datasets, the typical complexity of plant data likely introduces false positive calls.

Results

To enable reliable and comprehensive detection of CNV in plant genomes, we developed Hecaton, a novel computational workflow tailored to plants, that integrates calls from multiple state-of-the-art algorithms through a machine-learning approach. In this paper, we demonstrate that Hecaton outperforms current methods when applied to short read sequencing data of Arabidopsis thaliana, rice, maize, and tomato. Moreover, it correctly detects dispersed duplications, a type of CNV commonly found in plant species, in contrast to several state-of-the-art tools that erroneously represent this type of CNV as overlapping deletions and tandem duplications. Finally, Hecaton scales well in terms of memory usage and running time when applied to short read datasets of domesticated and wild tomato accessions.

Conclusions

Hecaton provides a robust method to detect CNV in plants. We expect it to be of immediate interest to both applied and fundamental research on the relationship between genotype and phenotype in plants.

Global impact of somatic structural variation on the DNA methylome of human cancers

Background

Genomic rearrangements exert a heavy influence on the molecular landscape of cancer. New analytical approaches integrating somatic structural variants (SSVs) with altered gene features represent a framework by which we can assign global significance to a core set of genes, analogous to established methods that identify genes non-randomly targeted by somatic mutation or copy number alteration. While recent studies have defined broad patterns of association involving gene transcription and nearby SSV breakpoints, global alterations in DNA methylation in the context of SSVs remain largely unexplored.

Results

By data integration of whole genome sequencing, RNA sequencing, and DNA methylation arrays from more than 1400 human cancers, we identify hundreds of genes and associated CpG islands (CGIs) for which the nearby presence of a somatic structural variant (SSV) breakpoint is recurrently associated with altered expression or DNA methylation, respectively, independently of copy number alterations. CGIs with SSV-associated increased methylation are predominantly promoter-associated, while CGIs with SSV-associated decreased methylation are enriched for gene body CGIs. Rearrangement of genomic regions normally having higher or lower methylation is often involved in SSV-associated CGI methylation alterations. Across cancers, the overall structural variation burden is associated with a global decrease in methylation, increased expression in methyltransferase genes and DNA damage response genes, and decreased immune cell infiltration.

Conclusion

Genomic rearrangement appears to have a major role in shaping the cancer DNA methylome, to be considered alongside commonly accepted mechanisms including histone modifications and disruption of DNA methyltransferases.

Evaluation of the performance of copy number variant prediction tools for the detection of deletions from whole genome sequencing data

BACKGROUND

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) has increased in popularity and decreased in cost over the past decade, rendering this approach as a viable and sensitive method for variant detection. In addition to its utility for single nucleotide variant detection, WGS data has the potential to detect Copy Number Variants (CNV) to fine resolution. Many CNV detection software packages have been developed exploiting four main types of data: read pair, split read, read depth, and assembly based methods. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of each of these main approaches in detecting germline deletions.

METHODS

WGS data and high confidence deletion calls for the individual NA12878 from the Genome in a Bottle consortium were the benchmark dataset. The performance of BreakDancer, CNVnator, Delly, FermiKit, and Pindel was assessed by comparing the accuracy and sensitivity of each software package in detecting deletions exceeding 1 kb.

RESULTS

There was considerable variability in the outputs of the different WGS CNV detection programs. The best performance was seen from BreakDancer and Delly, with 92.6% and 96.7% sensitivity, respectively and 34.5% and 68.5% false discovery rate (FDR), respectively. In comparison, Pindel, CNVnator, and FermiKit were less effective with sensitivities of 69.1%, 66.0%, and 15.8%, respectively and FDR of 91.3%, 69.0%, and 31.7%, respectively. Concordance across software packages was poor, with only 27 of the total 612 benchmark deletions identified by all five methodologies.

CONCLUSIONS

The WGS based CNV detection tools evaluated show disparate performance in identifying deletions ≥1 kb, particularly those utilising different input data characteristics. Software that exploits read pair based data had the highest sensitivity, namely BreakDancer and Delly. BreakDancer also had the second lowest false discovery rate. Therefore, in this analysis read pair methods (BreakDancer in particular) were the best performing approaches for the identification of deletions ≥1 kb, balancing accuracy and sensitivity. There is potential for improvement in the detection algorithms, particularly for reducing FDR. This analysis has validated the utility of WGS based CNV detection software to reliably identify deletions, and these findings will be of use when choosing appropriate software for deletion detection, in both research and diagnostic medicine.

The landscape of selection in 551 esophageal adenocarcinomas defines genomic biomarkers for the clinic

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is a poor-prognosis cancer type with rapidly rising incidence. Understanding of the genetic events driving EAC development is limited, and there are few molecular biomarkers for prognostication or therapeutics. Using a cohort of 551 genomically characterized EACs with matched RNA sequencing data, we discovered 77 EAC driver genes and 21 noncoding driver elements. We identified a mean of 4.4 driver events per tumor, which were derived more commonly from mutations than copy number alterations, and compared the prevelence of these mutations to the exome-wide mutational excess calculated using non-synonymous to synonymous mutation ratios (dN/dS). We observed mutual exclusivity or co-occurrence of events within and between several dysregulated EAC pathways, a result suggestive of strong functional relationships. Indicators of poor prognosis (SMAD4 and GATA4) were verified in independent cohorts with significant predictive value. Over 50% of EACs contained sensitizing events for CDK4 and CDK6 inhibitors, which were highly correlated with clinically relevant sensitivity in a panel of EAC cell lines and organoids.

BPG: Seamless, automated and interactive visualization of scientific data

BACKGROUND

We introduce BPG, a framework for generating publication-quality, highly-customizable plots in the R statistical environment.

RESULTS

This open-source package includes multiple methods of displaying high-dimensional datasets and facilitates generation of complex multi-panel figures, making it suitable for complex datasets. A web-based interactive tool allows online figure customization, from which R code can be downloaded for integration with computational pipelines.

CONCLUSION

BPG provides a new approach for linking interactive and scripted data visualization and is available at http://labs.oicr.on.ca/boutros-lab/software/bpg or via CRAN at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/BoutrosLab.plotting.general.