Assessment of remifentanil for rapid sequence induction and intubation in patients at risk of pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents compared to rapid-onset paralytic agents: study protocol for a non-inferiority simple blind randomized controlled trial (the REMICRUSH study)

Comparison of Two Anesthetic Regimens on Extubation Time and Postoperative Recovery in Children Undergoing Ambulatory Adenoidectomy: A Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

This aim of this study was to compare two anesthetic regimens in terms of extubation time and postoperative recovery in children undergoing ambulatory adenoidectomy.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching.

METHODS

The medical charts of 452 children aged between 3 and 8 years undergoing ambulatory adenoidectomy were retrieved for analysis, of which 438 were eligible to participate in this study. A majority (n = 327) were children exposed to a conventional propofol-pronounced general anesthetic regimen (high-dose propofol plus low-dose remifentanil, labeled as group P), while n = 111 were administered a modified remifentanil-pronounced anesthetic regimen (low-dose propofol plus high-dose remifentanil, namely group R). Propensity score matching was employed to adjust for confounders, resulting in 69 matched patients in each group. The primary endpoint of this study was extubation time. The secondary endpoints were total intraoperative fluid volume, length of stay in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), postoperative pain rating, the incidence of emergence agitation, nausea and vomiting, as well as the level of consciousness (fully awake or waking by gentle patting) when transferred out of PACU, and any major complications (wound bleeding, reintubation, readmission, and overnight stay).

FINDINGS

No major complications were observed in both groups. Compared to group P, group R had significantly shorter extubation time (8.2 ± 1.4 minutes vs 13.3 ± 2.4 minutes, P < .001), shorter length of stay in the PACU (14.1 ± 3.1 minutes vs 20.2 ± 3.4 minutes, P < .001), and a higher proportion of cases being fully awake when transferred out of the PACU (91% vs 46%, P < .001). Lastly, the pain rating, frequency of oropharyngeal airway usage, incidence of emergence agitation, and nausea and vomiting were comparable between the two groups (P > .05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Remifentanil-pronounced anesthesia was superior to propofol-pronounced anesthesia in children undergoing ambulatory adenoidectomy, given that the former was associated with a faster recovery time from anesthesia without jeopardizing patient safety.

Effect of Remifentanil vs Neuromuscular Blockers During Rapid Sequence Intubation on Successful Intubation Without Major Complications Among Patients at Risk of Aspiration: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

It is uncertain whether a rapid-onset opioid is noninferior to a rapid-onset neuromuscular blocker during rapid sequence intubation when used in conjunction with a hypnotic agent.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether remifentanil is noninferior to rapid-onset neuromuscular blockers for rapid sequence intubation.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Multicenter, randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial among 1150 adults at risk of aspiration (fasting for <6 hours, bowel occlusion, recent trauma, or severe gastroesophageal reflux) who underwent tracheal intubation in the operating room at 15 hospitals in France from October 2019 to April 2021. Follow-up was completed on May 15, 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to receive neuromuscular blockers (1 mg/kg of succinylcholine or rocuronium; n = 575) or remifentanil (3 to 4 μg/kg; n = 575) immediately after injection of a hypnotic.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was assessed in all randomized patients (as-randomized population) and in all eligible patients who received assigned treatment (per-protocol population). The primary outcome was successful tracheal intubation on the first attempt without major complications, defined as lung aspiration of digestive content, oxygen desaturation, major hemodynamic instability, sustained arrhythmia, cardiac arrest, and severe anaphylactic reaction. The prespecified noninferiority margin was 7.0%.

RESULTS

Among 1150 randomized patients (mean age, 50.7 [SD, 17.4] years; 573 [50%] women), 1130 (98.3%) completed the trial. In the as-randomized population, tracheal intubation on the first attempt without major complications occurred in 374 of 575 patients (66.1%) in the remifentanil group and 408 of 575 (71.6%) in the neuromuscular blocker group (between-group difference adjusted for randomization strata and center, -6.1%; 95% CI, -11.6% to -0.5%; P = .37 for noninferiority), demonstrating inferiority. In the per-protocol population, 374 of 565 patients (66.2%) in the remifentanil group and 403 of 565 (71.3%) in the neuromuscular blocker group had successful intubation without major complications (adjusted difference, -5.7%; 2-sided 95% CI, -11.3% to -0.1%; P = .32 for noninferiority). An adverse event of hemodynamic instability was recorded in 19 of 575 patients (3.3%) with remifentanil and 3 of 575 (0.5%) with neuromuscular blockers (adjusted difference, 2.8%; 95% CI, 1.2%-4.4%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among adults at risk of aspiration during rapid sequence intubation in the operating room, remifentanil, compared with neuromuscular blockers, did not meet the criterion for noninferiority with regard to successful intubation on first attempt without major complications. Although remifentanil was statistically inferior to neuromuscular blockers, the wide confidence interval around the effect estimate remains compatible with noninferiority and limits conclusions about the clinical relevance of the difference.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03960801.

Remifentanil modulates the TLR4‑mediated MMP‑9/TIMP1 balance and NF‑κB/STAT3 signaling in LPS‑induced A549 cells

Remifentanil is a widely used in general anesthetic that has been found to suppress the inflammatory response in aortic endothelial cells. Therefore, it was hypothesized that remifentanil can inhibit inflammatory dysfunction in lung epithelial cells to alleviate acute lung injury (ALI). The present study aimed to examine the effects of remifentanil on inflammatory injury, MMP-9/tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP1) balance and the potential associated regulatory pathways in A549 cells. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was used to treat A549 cells to establish ALI models. The possible roles of different concentrations of remifentanil in cell viability was then determined by CCK-8 and Lactate dehydrogenase release assay. Apoptosis was assessed by flow cytometry analysis and western blotting. Inflammation and oxidative stress were measured by ELISA and corresponding kits respectively. Subsequently, the effects of remifentanil on Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) expression and the MMP-9/TIMP1 balance were assessed by western blotting and ELISA. In addition, the effects of remifentanil on NF-κB/STAT3 signaling were evaluated by measuring the protein expression levels of associated pathway components and the degree of NF-κB nuclear translocation using western blotting and immunofluorescence respectively. Remifentanil was found to increase cell viability whilst reducing apoptosis, inflammation and oxidative stress in the LPS-treated cells. In addition, TLR4 inhibitor CLI-095 suppressed MMP-9 expression and secretion while potentiating TIMP1 expression and secretion in LPS-challenged cells. Remifentanil treatment was able to modulate TLR4 to mediate LPS-induced MMP-9/TIMP1 imbalance and suppress the phosphorylation of NF-κB/STAT3 signaling components, in addition to inhibiting NF-κB nuclear translocation. Taken together, remifentanil downregulated TLR4 to reduce MMP-9/TIMP1 imbalance to inhibit inflammatory dysfunction in LPS-treated A549 cells, by regulating NF-κB/STAT3 signaling.