1
|
Farisogullari B, Santos EJF, Dures E, Geenen R, Machado PM. Efficacy of pharmacological interventions: a systematic review informing the 2023 EULAR recommendations for the management of fatigue in people with inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. RMD Open 2023; 9:e003349. [PMID: 38056919 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify the best evidence on the efficacy of pharmacological interventions in reducing fatigue in people with inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (I-RMDs) and to summarise their safety in the identified studies to inform European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology recommendations for the management of fatigue in people with I-RMDs. METHODS Systematic review of adults with I-RMDs conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook. Search strategy ran in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL Complete, PEDro, OTseeker and PsycINFO. Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or controlled clinical trials were eligible. Assessment of risk of bias, data extraction and synthesis performed by two reviewers independently and in duplicate. Data pooled in statistical meta-analyses. RESULTS From 4151 records, 455 were selected for full-text review, 99 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and 19 RCTs were included in meta-analyses. Adalimumab was superior to placebo in reducing fatigue at 12 and 52 weeks in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (n=3 and 2 RCTs; mean difference (MD)= -3.03, p<0.001; MD=-2.25, p=0.03, respectively). Golimumab (n=2 RCTs; 24 weeks: MD=-5.27, p<0.001), baricitinib (n=2 RCTs; 24 weeks: MD=-4.06, p<0.001), sarilumab (n=2 RCTs; 24 weeks: MD=-3.15, p<0.001), tocilizumab (n=3 RCTs; 24 weeks: MD=-3.69, p<0.001) and tofacitinib (n=3 RCTs; 12 weeks: MD=-4.44, p<0.001) were also superior to placebo in reducing fatigue in RA. A dose/effect relationship was observed for sarilumab, tocilizumab and tofacitinib. In spondyloarthritis (excluding psoriatic arthritis), secukinumab was superior to placebo in reducing fatigue at 16 weeks (n=2 RCTs; MD=-4.15, p<0.001), with a dose/effect relationship also observed. The narrative results of the RCTs not included in the meta-analysis indicated that several other pharmacological interventions were efficacious in reducing fatigue, with reassuring safety results. CONCLUSIONS Several pharmacological interventions are efficacious and generally safe for managing fatigue in people with I-RMDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eduardo José Ferreira Santos
- School of Health, Polytechnic University, Viseu, Portugal
- Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICiSA:E), Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Emma Dures
- Academic Rheumatology, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK
- School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Rinie Geenen
- Department of Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Pedro M Machado
- Centre for Rheumatology & Department of Neuromuscular Diseases, University College London, London, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Rheumatology, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dua AB, Ford K, Fiore S, Pappas DA, Janak JC, Blachley T, Roberts-Toler C, Emeanuru K, Kremer JM, Kivitz A. Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis After Switching Between Interleukin-6-Receptor Inhibitors and Janus Kinase Inhibitors: Findings from an Observational Study. Rheumatol Ther 2023; 10:1753-1768. [PMID: 37906399 PMCID: PMC10654323 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-023-00609-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This observational study evaluated response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who switched from an interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor (IL-6Ri) to a Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) and vice versa. METHODS Adult patients with RA, who initiated IL-6Ri or JAKi (following discontinuation of JAKi or IL-6Ri, respectively) during/after December 2012 and had a 6-month follow-up visit were enrolled. Clinical outcomes were evaluated at baseline and the follow-up visit. Continuous outcomes included Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), pain, fatigue, tender joint count, swollen joint count, Physician Global Assessment (MDGA), Patient Global Assessment (PtGA), and morning stiffness duration. Categorical outcomes included the proportion of patients achieving CDAI low disease activity (LDA), remission, and minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for HAQ, pain, fatigue, MDGA, and PtGA. Continuous outcomes were summarized as mean changes from baseline, and categorical outcomes as response rates. Differences in the outcome measures between groups were evaluated using linear and logistic regression models. RESULTS Between IL-6Ri (n = 100) and JAKi initiators (n = 129), no significant differences were noted for continuous outcomes. Within both groups, a significant proportion of patients achieved LDA, remission, and MCIDs for other measures, although the odds of achieving LDA were higher among IL-6Ri (vs. JAKi) initiators with moderate-to-severe disease (adjusted odds ratio: 3.30 [1.01, 10.78]). CONCLUSIONS Patients with RA can achieve improvement in response when switching between IL-6Ri and JAKi. Although both therapies affect the IL-6 pathway, there are distinct mechanisms of action, which likely contribute to their clinical improvement, when reciprocally switched as follow-on treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anisha B Dua
- Division of Rheumatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Kerri Ford
- Medical Affairs, Sanofi, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | - Dimitrios A Pappas
- CorEvitas, LLC, Waltham, MA, USA
- Division of Rheumatology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
- Corrona Research Foundation, Waltham, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Joel M Kremer
- CorEvitas, LLC, Waltham, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Center for Rheumatology, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Alan Kivitz
- Altoona Center for Clinical Research, Duncansville, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Burmester GR, Strand V, Kivitz AJ, Hu CC, Wang S, van Hoogstraten H, Klier GL, Fleischmann R. Long-term safety and efficacy of sarilumab with or without background csDMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2023; 62:3268-3279. [PMID: 36727470 PMCID: PMC10547516 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of sarilumab with/without conventional synthetic (cs)DMARDs in RA. METHODS The analyses evaluated two open-label extensions (OLEs): EXTEND and MONARCH OLE, which included patients from six randomized trials. Patients received sarilumab 200 mg once every 2 weeks (q2w) for at least 264 weeks up to 516 weeks (EXTEND: Sarilumab Monotherapy and Sarilumab + csDMARD groups) or for 276 weeks (MONARCH OLE: Continuation and Switch groups). Primary endpoints included safety, immunogenicity and changes in laboratory parameters. Secondary endpoints included clinical signs and symptoms along with health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) questionnaires. RESULTS The Sarilumab Monotherapy (n = 111), Continuation (n = 165) and Switch (n = 155) groups received sarilumab monotherapy, while the Sarilumab + csDMARD group (n = 1910) received sarilumab in combination with csDMARDs. Incidence of one or more treatment-emergent adverse events was 126 (Sarilumab Monotherapy group), 169 (Sarilumab + csDMARD group), 159 (Continuation group) and 159 (Switch group) events/100 patient-years. Neutropenia was the most common adverse event. Neutropenia was not associated with an increased incidence of infections. Most neutropenia cases normalized on-treatment. Adverse events of special interests, such as malignancies, major adverse cardiovascular events, venous thromboembolism and gastrointestinal perforations, were rare. Immunogenicity was low and not associated with hypersensitivity reactions or discontinuations due to lack or loss of efficacy. Improvements in clinical signs and symptoms and HRQOL, observed during the initial blinded trials, were maintained throughout the OLE assessment period. CONCLUSIONS Long-term sarilumab treatment with/without csDMARDs in patients with RA revealed no new safety findings. Efficacy and HRQOL were maintained or further increased over the open-label assessment period. TRIAL REGISTRATION EXTEND, ClinicalTrials.gov, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01146652, NCT01146652; MONARCH OLE, ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02332590, NCT02332590.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerd R Burmester
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Vibeke Strand
- Division of Immunology/Rheumatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Alan J Kivitz
- Department of Rheumatology, Altoona Center for Clinical Research, Duncansville, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Roy Fleischmann
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Metroplex Clinical Research Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang W, Tocher P, L'Heureux J, Sou J, Sun H. Measuring, Analyzing, and Presenting Work Productivity Loss in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Scoping Review. Value Health 2023; 26:123-137. [PMID: 35961865 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Revised: 05/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to conduct a scoping review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and investigate which work productivity loss outcomes were measured in these RCTs, how each outcome was measured and analyzed, and how the results for each outcome were presented. METHODS A systematic search was conducted from January 2010 to April 2020 from 2 databases: PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Data on country, study population, disease focus, sample size, work productivity loss outcomes measured (absenteeism, presenteeism, employment status changes), and methods used to measure, report, and analyze each work productivity loss outcome were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS We found 435 studies measuring absenteeism or presenteeism, of which 155 studies (35.6%) measured both absenteeism and presenteeism and were included in our final review. Only 9 studies also measured employment status changes. The most used questionnaire was the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire. The analysis of absenteeism and presenteeism data was mostly done using regression models (n = 98, n = 98, respectively) for which a normal distribution was assumed (n = 77, n = 89, respectively). Absenteeism results were most often presented in time whereas presenteeism was commonly presented using a percent scale or score. CONCLUSIONS There is a lack of consensus on how to measure, analyze, and present work productivity loss outcomes in RCTs published in the past 10 years. The diversity of measurement, analysis, and presentation methods used in RCTs may make comparability challenging. There is a need for guidelines providing recommendations to standardize the comprehensiveness and the appropriateness of methods used to measure, analyze, and report work productivity loss in RCTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Zhang
- School of Population and Public Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - Paige Tocher
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jacynthe L'Heureux
- School of Population and Public Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Julie Sou
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Huiying Sun
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Alciati A, Di Carlo M, Siragusano C, Palumbo A, Masala IF, Atzeni F. Effect of biological DMARDs and JAK inhibitors in pain of chronic inflammatory arthritis. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2022; 22:1311-1322. [PMID: 36168970 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2022.2130243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The advent of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and, more recently, of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) has had a major impact on the long-term outcomes of chronic inflammatory arthritis (IA). However, the persistence of pain, even in patients with a complete pharmacological control of peripheral inflammation, represents an important clinical challenge in the treatment of IA. AREAS COVERED In this review, we provide an overview of possible mechanisms underlying pain in IA and its assessment, as well as the effects of bDMARDs and JAKi on pain management. EXPERT OPINION The overall data showed a good effect of bDMARDs and JAKi on pain, more pronounced for JAKi. However, it is challenging to distinguish the effect on the different types of pain (nociceptive, neuropathic, and nociplastic).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Alciati
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Hermanas Hospitalarias, Villa San Benedetto Menni Hospital, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Albese con Cassano, via Roma 16, 22032 Como, Italy; Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Di Carlo
- Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Jesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Cesare Siragusano
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Experimental and Internal Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Antonino Palumbo
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Experimental and Internal Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | | | - Fabiola Atzeni
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Experimental and Internal Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kastrati K, Aletaha D, Burmester GR, Chwala E, Dejaco C, Dougados M, McInnes IB, Ravelli A, Sattar N, Stamm TA, Takeuchi T, Trauner M, van der Heijde D, Voshaar MJH, Winthrop K, Smolen JS, Kerschbaumer A. A systematic literature review informing the consensus statement on efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatment with interleukin-6 pathway inhibition with biological DMARDs in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. RMD Open 2022; 8:rmdopen-2022-002359. [PMID: 36260501 PMCID: PMC9462104 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Informing an international task force updating the consensus statement on efficacy and safety of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) selectively targeting interleukin-6 (IL-6) pathway in the context of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Methods A systematic literature research of all publications on IL-6 axis inhibition with bDMARDs published between January 2012 and December 2020 was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Efficacy and safety outcomes were assessed in clinical trials including their long-term extensions and observational studies. Meeting abstracts from ACR, EULAR conferences and results on clinicaltrials.gov were taken into consideration. Results 187 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Evidence for positive effect of IL-6 inhibition was available in various inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, giant cell arteritis, Takayasu arteritis, adult-onset Still’s disease, cytokine release syndrome due to chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy and systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease. Newcomers like satralizumab and anti-IL-6 ligand antibody siltuximab have expanded therapeutic approaches for Castleman’s disease and neuromyelitis optica, respectively. IL-6 inhibition did not provide therapeutic benefits in psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and certain connective tissue diseases. In COVID-19, tocilizumab (TCZ) has proven to be therapeutic in advanced disease. Safety outcomes did not differ from other bDMARDs, except higher risks of diverticulitis and lower gastrointestinal perforations. Inconsistent results were observed in several studies investigating the risk for infections when comparing TCZ to TNF-inhibitors. Conclusion IL-6 inhibition is effective for treatment of several inflammatory diseases with a safety profile that is widely comparable to other bDMARDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kastriot Kastrati
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Daniel Aletaha
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Gerd R Burmester
- Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charite University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eva Chwala
- University Library, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Christian Dejaco
- Rheumatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Rheumatology, Hospital of Bruneck, Bruneck, Italy
| | - Maxime Dougados
- Hopital Cochin, Rheumatology, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Iain B McInnes
- Institute of Infection, Immunity & Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Angelo Ravelli
- UO Pediatria II-Reumatologia, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy
| | - Naveed Sattar
- Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Tanja A Stamm
- Section for Outcomes Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tsutomu Takeuchi
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Japan
| | - Michael Trauner
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna Department of Medicine III, Wien, Austria
| | | | - Marieke J H Voshaar
- Department of Pharmacy and Department of Research & Innovation, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Kevin Winthrop
- Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Josef S Smolen
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Andreas Kerschbaumer
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Aletaha D, Kerschbaumer A, Kastrati K, Dejaco C, Dougados M, McInnes IB, Sattar N, Stamm TA, Takeuchi T, Trauner M, van der Heijde D, Voshaar M, Winthrop KL, Ravelli A, Betteridge N, Burmester GRR, Bijlsma JW, Bykerk V, Caporali R, Choy EH, Codreanu C, Combe B, Crow MK, de Wit M, Emery P, Fleischmann RM, Gabay C, Hetland ML, Hyrich KL, Iagnocco A, Isaacs JD, Kremer JM, Mariette X, Merkel PA, Mysler EF, Nash P, Nurmohamed MT, Pavelka K, Poor G, Rubbert-Roth A, Schulze-Koops H, Strangfeld A, Tanaka Y, Smolen JS. Consensus statement on blocking interleukin-6 receptor and interleukin-6 in inflammatory conditions: an update. Ann Rheum Dis 2022; 82:773-787. [PMID: 35953263 DOI: 10.1136/ard-2022-222784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Targeting interleukin (IL)-6 has become a major therapeutic strategy in the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory disease. Interference with the IL-6 pathway can be directed at the specific receptor using anti-IL-6Rα antibodies or by directly inhibiting the IL-6 cytokine. This paper is an update of a previous consensus document, based on most recent evidence and expert opinion, that aims to inform on the medical use of interfering with the IL-6 pathway. METHODS A systematic literature research was performed that focused on IL-6-pathway inhibitors in inflammatory diseases. Evidence was put in context by a large group of international experts and patients in a subsequent consensus process. All were involved in formulating the consensus statements, and in the preparation of this document. RESULTS The consensus process covered relevant aspects of dosing and populations for different indications of IL-6 pathway inhibitors that are approved across the world, including rheumatoid arthritis, polyarticular-course and systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, giant cell arteritis, Takayasu arteritis, adult-onset Still's disease, Castleman's disease, chimeric antigen receptor-T-cell-induced cytokine release syndrome, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and severe COVID-19. Also addressed were other clinical aspects of the use of IL-6 pathway inhibitors, including pretreatment screening, safety, contraindications and monitoring. CONCLUSIONS The document provides a comprehensive consensus on the use of IL-6 inhibition to treat inflammatory disorders to inform healthcare professionals (including researchers), patients, administrators and payers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Aletaha
- Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | | | - Kastriot Kastrati
- Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Christian Dejaco
- Rheumatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.,Rheumatology, Brunico Hospital, Brunico, Italy
| | - Maxime Dougados
- Rheumatology, Universite Paris Descartes Faculte de Medecine Site Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Iain B McInnes
- Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Naveed Sattar
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, British Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - Tanja A Stamm
- Section for Outcomes Research, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Tsutomu Takeuchi
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Japan
| | - Michael Trauner
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Désirée van der Heijde
- Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marieke Voshaar
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, Enschede, Netherlands and Stichting Tools Patient Empowerment, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Kevin L Winthrop
- Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Division of Infectious Diseases, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Angelo Ravelli
- UO Pediatria II-Reumatologia, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy
| | | | | | - Johannes Wj Bijlsma
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Vivian Bykerk
- Rheumatology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Roberto Caporali
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, ASS G. Pini, University of Milan, Milano, Italy
| | - Ernest H Choy
- CREATE Centre, Section of Rheumatology, School of Medicine, Division of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Catalin Codreanu
- Rheumatology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucuresti, Romania
| | - Bernard Combe
- Immunorhumatologie, CHU Lapeyronie, Montpellier, France
| | - Mary K Crow
- Mary Kirkland Center for Lupus Research, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Maarten de Wit
- Medical Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Duivendrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Emery
- University of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Leeds, UK.,Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds, UK
| | - Roy M Fleischmann
- Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Cem Gabay
- Division of Rheumatology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Merete Lund Hetland
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Kobenhavn, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark
| | - Kimme L Hyrich
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Annamaria Iagnocco
- Scienze Cliniche e Biologiche, Università degli Studi di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - John D Isaacs
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Joel M Kremer
- Medicine Rheumatology, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Xavier Mariette
- Rheumatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,Center for Immunology of Viral Infections and Auto-immune Diseases, Université Paris-Sud, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Peter A Merkel
- Rheumatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Eduardo F Mysler
- Organización Médica de Investigación SA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Peter Nash
- Griffith University School of Medicine, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - Karel Pavelka
- Rheumatology Department, Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic
| | - Gyula Poor
- National Institute of Rheumatology & Physiology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Andrea Rubbert-Roth
- Division of Rheumatology, Kantonsspital Sankt Gallen, Sankt Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Hendrik Schulze-Koops
- Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Internal Medicine IV, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munchen, Munchen, Germany
| | - Anja Strangfeld
- Forschungsbereich Epidemiologie, Deutsches Rheuma-Forschungszentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Yoshiya Tanaka
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Josef S Smolen
- Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bingham CO, Walker D, Nash P, Lee SJ, Ye L, Hu H, Khalid JM, Combe B. The impact of filgotinib on patient-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life for patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a post hoc analysis of Phase 3 studies. Arthritis Res Ther 2022; 24:11. [PMID: 34980223 PMCID: PMC8722138 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-021-02677-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 04/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The effects of filgotinib on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from 3 trials in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis were investigated. Methods Methotrexate (MTX)-naïve patients received filgotinib 200 or 100 mg plus MTX (FIL200+MTX, FIL100+MTX), filgotinib 200 mg monotherapy (FIL200), or MTX monotherapy through 52 weeks (NCT02886728). Patients with inadequate response (IR) to MTX (MTX-IR) received FIL200+MTX, FIL100+MTX, adalimumab 40 mg +MTX (ADA+MTX), or placebo (PBO)+MTX (rerandomized to FIL200+MTX or FIL100+MTX at week 24) through 52 weeks (NCT02889796). Patients with IR to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD-IR) received FIL200 or FIL100 or PBO with background stable conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs for up to 24 weeks (NCT02873936). PROs included Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) physical/mental component summary (PCS/MCS), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire-Rheumatoid Arthritis (WPAI-RA), and Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA). Data are reported as least-squares mean changes from baseline with standard error to the timepoint representing each study’s primary endpoint. All statistical comparisons are of filgotinib groups vs their respective control groups. Results At week 24, among MTX-naïve patients, change from baseline (standard deviation) in HAQ-DI was − 1.00 (0.03; P < 0.001) with FIL200+MTX, − 0.94 (0.04; P < 0.01) with FIL100+MTX, and − 0.91 (0.04; P < 0.05) with FIL200 alone compared with − 0.81 (0.03) with MTX alone. At week 12, among MTX-IR patients, change from baseline in HAQ-DI was − 0.69 (0.04; P < 0.001 vs PBO+MTX, P < 0.05 vs ADA) with FIL200+MTX, − 0.57 (0.04; P < 0.001 vs placebo) with FIL100+MTX, and − 0.60 (0.04) with ADA vs − 0.40 (0.04) with PBO+MTX. At week 12, among bDMARD-IR patients, change from baseline in HAQ-DI was − 0.50 (0.06; P < 0.001) with FIL200+csDMARD and − 0.46 (0.05; P < 0.001) with FIL100+csDMARD vs − 0.19 (0.06) with placebo+csDMARD. Changes in SF-36 PCS and MCS, FACIT-Fatigue, WPAI, and PtGA tended to favor filgotinib over PBO, MTX, and ADA. Greater proportions of patients experienced clinically meaningful differences with either dosage of FIL in combination with csDMARDs (including MTX) and with FIL200 monotherapy vs comparators. Conclusions Filgotinib provided improvements in PROs across patient populations. These findings suggest filgotinib can be an effective treatment option for patients with insufficient response to MTX or bDMARDs and patients who are MTX-naïve. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, FINCH 1, NCT02889796, first posted September 7, 2016; FINCH 2, NCT02873936, first posted August 22, 2016, retrospectively registered; FINCH 3, NCT02886728, first posted September 1, 2016, retrospectively registered. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13075-021-02677-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clifton O Bingham
- Division of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University, 5200 Eastern Avenue, Mason F. Lord Bldg, Center Tower, Room 434A, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
| | | | - Peter Nash
- Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | | | - Lei Ye
- Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA, USA
| | - Hao Hu
- Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jarlborg M, Gabay C. Systemic effects of IL-6 blockade in rheumatoid arthritis beyond the joints. Cytokine 2021; 149:155742. [PMID: 34688020 DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2021.155742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2021] [Revised: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Interleukin (IL)-6 is produced locally in response to an inflammatory stimulus, and is able to induce systemic manifestations at distance from the site of inflammation. Its unique signaling mechanism, including classical and trans-signaling pathways, leads to a major expansion in the number of cell types responding to IL-6. This pleiotropic cytokine is a key factor in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and is involved in many extra-articular manifestations that accompany the disease. Thus, IL-6 blockade is associated with various biological effects beyond the joints. In this review, the systemic effects of IL-6 in RA comorbidities and the consequences of its blockade will be discussed, including anemia of chronic disease, cardiovascular risks, bone and muscle functions, and neuro-psychological manifestations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Jarlborg
- Division of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Geneva, and Department of Pathology and Immunology, University of Geneva School of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland; VIB-UGent Center for Inflammation Research and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Cem Gabay
- Division of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Geneva, and Department of Pathology and Immunology, University of Geneva School of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Burmester GR, Bykerk VP, Buch MH, Tanaka Y, Kameda H, Praestgaard A, van Hoogstraten H, Fernandez-Nebro A, Huizinga T. Sarilumab monotherapy versus sarilumab and methotrexate combination therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 61:2596-2602. [PMID: 34508594 PMCID: PMC9157062 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Sarilumab, as monotherapy or in combination with conventional synthetic DMARDs, such as methotrexate (MTX), has demonstrated improvement in clinical outcomes in patients with RA. The primary objective of this post hoc analysis was to compare the efficacy of sarilumab (200 mg every 2 weeks) monotherapy (MONARCH study) with that of sarilumab and MTX combination therapy (MOBILITY study) at week 24. METHODS The endpoints assessed were mean change from baseline in the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), 28-joint Disease Activity using C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP), CRP, haemoglobin (Hb), pain visual analogue scale (VAS) and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue. Least square (LS) mean change from baseline (95% confidence interval [CI]) at week 24 for all endpoints was compared between the treatment arms for adjusted comparisons. RESULTS This analysis included 184 patients on sarilumab monotherapy and 399 patients on sarilumab plus MTX. Differences (p < 0.05) were observed in ethnicity, region, body mass index group, rheumatoid factor, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies, swollen joint count, CRP, CDAI and oral glucocorticoid use between these treatment groups. After adjusting for these differences in a mixed-effect model repeated measure, LS mean change from baseline for all assessments was similar between the treatment groups with overlapping CIs: CDAI, -28.79 vs -26.21; DAS28-CRP, -2.95 vs -2.81; CRP, -18.31 vs -16.46; Hb, 6.59 vs 8.09; Pain VAS, -33.62 vs -31.66; FACIT-Fatigue, 9.90 vs 10.24. CONCLUSION This analysis demonstrated that the efficacy of sarilumab monotherapy was similar to that of sarilumab and MTX combination therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerd R Burmester
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Vivian P Bykerk
- Inflammatory Arthritis Center, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maya H Buch
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Musculoskeletal & Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Yoshiya Tanaka
- The First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Hideto Kameda
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Toho University, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | - Antonio Fernandez-Nebro
- UGC Rheumatology, Institute of Biomedical Research in Malaga (IBIMA), Regional University Hospital of Malaga, University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain
| | - Thomas Huizinga
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Marques ML, Alunno A, Boonen A, Ter Wee MM, Falzon L, Ramiro S, Putrik P. Methodological aspects of design, analysis and reporting of studies with work participation as an outcome domain in patients with inflammatory arthritis: results of two systematic literature reviews informing EULAR points to consider. RMD Open 2021; 7:rmdopen-2020-001522. [PMID: 33542048 PMCID: PMC7868290 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Revised: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To summarise the methodological aspects in studies with work participation (WP) as outcome domain in inflammatory arthritis (IA) and other chronic diseases. Methods Two systematic literature reviews (SLRs) were conducted in key electronic databases (2014–2019): search 1 focused on longitudinal prospective studies in IA and search 2 on SLRs in other chronic diseases. Two reviewers independently identified eligible studies and extracted data covering pre-defined methodological areas. Results In total, 58 studies in IA (22 randomised controlled trials, 36 longitudinal observational studies) and 24 SLRs in other chronic diseases were included. WP was the primary outcome in 26/58 (45%) studies. The methodological aspects least accounted for in IA studies were as follows (proportions of studies positively adhering to the topic are shown): aligning the studied population (16/58 (28%)) and sample size calculation (8/58 (14%)) with the work-related study objective; attribution of WP to overall health (28/58 (48%)); accounting for skewness of presenteeism/sick leave (10/52 (19%)); accounting for work-related contextual factors (25/58 (43%)); reporting attrition and its reasons (1/58 (2%)); reporting both aggregated results and proportions of individuals reaching predefined meaningful change or state (11/58 (16%)). SLRs in other chronic diseases confirmed heterogeneity and methodological flaws identified in IA studies without identifying new issues. Conclusion High methodological heterogeneity was observed in studies with WP as outcome domain. Consensus around various methodological aspects specific to WP studies is needed to improve quality of future studies. This review informs the EULAR Points to Consider for conducting and reporting studies with WP as an outcome in IA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Lucy Marques
- Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands .,Rheumatology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitario de Coimbra EPE, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Alessia Alunno
- Rheumatology Unit, University of Perugia Department of Medicine, Perugia, Umbria, Italy
| | - Annelies Boonen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Services Research, Universiteit Maastricht Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke M Ter Wee
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology and immunology, AI&I, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Louise Falzon
- Center for Personalized Health, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sofia Ramiro
- Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands.,Rheumatology, Zuyderland Medical Centre Heerlen, Heerlen, Limburg, The Netherlands
| | - Polina Putrik
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Services Research, Universiteit Maastricht Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Luurssen-Masurel N, Weel AEAM, Hazes JMW, de Jong PHP. The impact of different (rheumatoid) arthritis phenotypes on patients' lives. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 60:3716-3726. [PMID: 33237330 PMCID: PMC8328508 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Revised: 11/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To compare patient-reported outcome (PRO) domains between three arthritis phenotypes [undifferentiated arthritis (UA), autoantibody-negative RA (RA−) and autoantibody-positive RA (RA+)] at diagnosis, after 2 years and over time. Methods All UA (n = 130), RA− (n = 176) and RA+ (n = 331) patients from the tREACH trial, a stratified single-blinded trial with a treat-to-target approach, were used. PRO comparisons between phenotypes at baseline and after 2 years were performed with analysis of variance, while a linear mixed model compared them over time. Effect sizes were weighted against the minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for each PRO. Results RA− patients had a higher disease burden compared with RA+ and UA. At baseline and after 2 years, RA− patients had more functional impairment and a poorer Physical Component Summary (PCS) compared with the other phenotypes, while they only scored worse for general health and morning stiffness duration at baseline. The MCIDs were exceeded at baseline, except for functional ability between RA+ and UA, while after 2 years only the MCID of the PCS was exceeded by RA− compared with UA and RA. After 2 years the PROs of all phenotypes improved, but PROs measuring functioning were still worse compared with the general population, even when patients had low disease activity. Conclusion RA− patients had the highest disease burden of all phenotypes. Although most patients have low disease activity after treatment, all clinical phenotypes still have a similar significant impact on patients’ lives, which is mainly physical. Therefore it is important to assess and address PROs in daily practice because of persistent disease burden despite low disease activity. Trial registration ISRCTN26791028.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Angelique Elisabeth Adriana Maria Weel
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Genovese MC, Durez P, Fleischmann R, Tanaka Y, Furst D, Yamanaka H, Korneva E, Vasyutin I, Takeuchi T. Long-term safety and efficacy of olokizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitor therapy in phase II studies. Eur J Rheumatol 2021; 8:120-129. [PMID: 34101570 PMCID: PMC9770405 DOI: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2021.19207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of olokizumab (OKZ), an anti-interleukin (IL)-6 monoclonal antibody, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors. METHODS Eligible patients completed study RA0056, which tested several doses of OKZ, placebo (PBO), and tocilizumab (TCZ) plus methotrexate (MTX) in Western countries, and RA0083 included several doses of OKZ and PBO plus MTX in Asian countries. Both studies were followed by open-label extension (OLE) studies with OKZ 120 mg every 2 weeks, RA0057 and RA0089, respectively. Safety assessments were reported up to 124 weeks in RA0057 and 92 weeks in RA0089. Efficacy assessments were reported up to week 60 in RA0057 and week 52 in RA0089. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was performed, and missing data were not imputed. RESULTS A total of 190 patients in RA0057 and 103 patients in RA0089 received OKZ with median treatment duration of 14.1 and 10.1 months, respectively. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in 44 patients (23.2%, 32.7 events per 100 patient-years [PY]) in RA0057 and in 13 patients (12.6%, 23.6 events per 100 PY) in RA0089. Among treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), including SAEs, infections were the most common events. TEAEs leading to withdrawal were reported in 33 (17.4%) patients in RA0057 and in 7 (6.8%) patients in RA0089. Disease activity score 28-joint count on the basis of C-reactive protein level, clinical disease activity index, and simplified disease activity index, as well as the American College of Rheumatology 20%, 50%, and 70% response rates were maintained during the OLE studies, including in those who switched from PBO or TCZ. Improvements in patient-reported outcomes were maintained in OLEs as well. CONCLUSION In the 2 long-term studies, OKZ treatment demonstrated a safety profile expected for IL-6 blocking agents without new safety signals and led to sustained improvements in RA symptoms, physical function, and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark C. Genovese
- Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California,
USA
| | - Patrick Durez
- Pôle de Pathologies Rhumatismales, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCL, Brussels,
Belgium
| | - Roy Fleischmann
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Metroplex Clinical Research Center, Dallas, Texas,
USA
| | - Yoshiya Tanaka
- The First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health School of Medicine, Fukuoka,
Japan
| | - Daniel Furst
- The Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California,
USA
| | - Hisashi Yamanaka
- Institute of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo,
Japan
| | | | | | - Tsutomu Takeuchi
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo,
Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Pain is a major and common symptom reported as a top priority in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Intuitively, RA-related pain is often considered to be a natural consequence of peripheral inflammation, so treatment of RA is expected to manage pain concurrently as part of inflammation control. However, pain in patients with RA can be poorly correlated with objective measures of inflammation, for example, in patients who are otherwise in remission. Joint damage appears to account for only a fraction of this residual pain. Emerging evidence suggests that alteration of peripheral and central pain processing contributes to RA-related pain; this is parallel to, but somewhat independent of, joint inflammation. Interleukin (IL)-6 is a proinflammatory cytokine that contributes to the pathogenesis of RA. It exerts systemic effects via signaling through soluble forms of the IL-6 receptor (“trans-signaling”). Evidence from preclinical studies demonstrates that intra-articular IL-6 can produce long-lasting peripheral sensitization to mechanical stimulation and suggests an important role for IL-6 in central pain sensitization. This may be partly explained by its ability to activate neurons through trans-signaling, affecting nociceptive plasticity and nerve fiber regrowth. Local activity at neuron endings may culminate in altered pain processing in the central nervous system because of persistent signaling from sensitized peripheral neurons. Peripheral and central sensitization can promote the development of chronic pain, which can have a significant impact on patients’ health and quality of life. A proportion of pain in RA may be more appropriately managed as an entity separate from inflammation. Both the peripheral and central nervous systems should be recognized as important potential systems targeted by RA. The substantial burden of RA-related chronic pain suggests that pain should be a key focus in RA management and should be assessed and addressed early and separately from the inflammatory component.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Sebba
- Division of Rheumatology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lane CY, Givens DL, Thoma LM. General Functional Status: Common Outcome Measures for Adults With Rheumatic Disease. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2020; 72 Suppl 10:431-451. [PMID: 33091251 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
16
|
Strand V, Boklage SH, Kimura T, Joly F, Boyapati A, Msihid J. High levels of interleukin-6 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis are associated with greater improvements in health-related quality of life for sarilumab compared with adalimumab. Arthritis Res Ther 2020; 22:250. [PMID: 33081825 PMCID: PMC7574446 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-020-02344-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Increased levels of cytokines, including interleukin-6 (IL-6), reflect inflammation and have been shown to be predictive of therapeutic responses, fatigue, pain, and depression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but limited data exist on associations between IL-6 levels and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This post hoc analysis of MONARCH phase III randomized controlled trial data evaluated the potential of baseline IL-6 levels to differentially predict HRQoL improvements with sarilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody directed against both soluble and membrane-bound IL-6 receptor α (anti-IL-6Rα) versus adalimumab, a tumor necrosis factor α inhibitor, both approved for treatment of active RA. Methods Baseline serum IL-6 levels in 300/369 randomized patients were categorized into low (1.6–7.1 pg/mL), medium (7.2–39.5 pg/mL), and high (39.6–692.3 pg/mL) tertiles. HRQoL was measured at baseline and week (W)24 and W52 by Short Form 36 (SF-36) physical/mental component summary (PCS/MCS) and domain scores, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy -fatigue, and duration of morning stiffness visual analog scale (AM-stiffness VAS). Linear regression of changes from baseline in HRQoL (IL-6 tertile, treatment, region as a stratification factor, and IL-6 tertile-by-treatment interaction as fixed effects) assessed predictivity of baseline IL-6 levels, with low tertile as reference. Pairwise comparisons of improvements between treatment groups were performed by tertile; least squares mean differences and 95% CIs were calculated. Similar analyses evaluated W24 patient-level response on minimum clinically important differences (MCID). Results At baseline, patients with high versus medium or low IL-6 levels (n = 100, respectively) reported worse (nominal p < 0.05) SF-36 MCS and role-physical, bodily pain, social functioning, role-emotional domain, and AM-stiffness VAS scores. There was a greater treatment effect with sarilumab versus adalimumab in high tertile versus low tertile groups in SF-36 PCS, physical functioning domain, and AM-stiffness VAS (nominal interaction p < 0.05). PCS improvements ≥MCID were higher in high (odds ratio [OR] 6.31 [2.37, 16.81]) versus low (OR 0.97 [0.43, 2.16]) tertiles with sarilumab versus adalimumab (nominal interaction p < 0.05). Adverse events between IL-6 tertiles were similar. Conclusions Patients with high baseline IL-6 levels reported better improvements in PCS, physical functioning domain, and AM-stiffness scores with sarilumab versus adalimumab and safety consistent with IL-6R blockade. Trial registration NCT02332590. Registered on 5 January 2015
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Susan H Boklage
- Formerly, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA
| | | | - Florence Joly
- Sanofi, 1 Avenue Pierre Brossolette, 91385, Chilly-Mazarin, France
| | | | - Jérôme Msihid
- Sanofi, 1 Avenue Pierre Brossolette, 91385, Chilly-Mazarin, France.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Favalli EG. Understanding the Role of Interleukin-6 (IL-6) in the Joint and Beyond: A Comprehensive Review of IL-6 Inhibition for the Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Rheumatol Ther 2020; 7:473-516. [PMID: 32734482 PMCID: PMC7410942 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-020-00219-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, debilitating autoimmune disorder involving inflammation and progressive destruction of the joints, affecting up to 1% of the population. The majority of patients with RA have one or more comorbid conditions, the most common being cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, and depression, the presence of which are associated with poorer clinical outcomes and lower health-related quality of life. RA pathogenesis is driven by a complex network of proinflammatory cells and cytokines, and of these, interleukin-6 (IL-6) plays a key role in the chronic inflammation associated with RA. Through cell signaling that can be initiated by both membrane-bound and soluble forms of its receptor, IL-6 acts both locally to promote joint inflammation and destruction, and in the circulation to mediate extra-articular manifestations of RA, including pain, fatigue, morning stiffness, anemia, and weight loss. This narrative review describes the role of IL-6 in the pathogenesis of RA, its comorbidities, and extra-articular systemic manifestations, and examines the effects of the IL-6 receptor inhibitors sarilumab and tocilizumab on clinical endpoints of RA, patient-reported outcomes, and common comorbidities and extra-articular manifestations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ennio G Favalli
- Department of Rheumatology, ASST Gaetano Pini-CTO Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Boyapati A, Schwartzman S, Msihid J, Choy E, Genovese MC, Burmester GR, Lam G, Kimura T, Sadeh J, Weinreich DM, Yancopoulos GD, Graham NMH. Association of High Serum Interleukin-6 Levels With Severe Progression of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Increased Treatment Response Differentiating Sarilumab From Adalimumab or Methotrexate in a Post Hoc Analysis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2020; 72:1456-1466. [PMID: 32343882 PMCID: PMC7496495 DOI: 10.1002/art.41299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2019] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Objective The development of biomarkers to guide treatment decisions is a major research focus in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients with RA have elevated interleukin‐6 (IL‐6) levels; however, the utility of IL‐6 as a predictor of treatment response is unclear. This study was undertaken to investigate, by post hoc analysis, whether baseline IL‐6 levels are predictive of sarilumab treatment responses in 2 phase III studies. Methods Serum IL‐6 concentrations were measured in patients with RA prior to receiving sarilumab 200 mg (n = 148) or adalimumab 40 mg (n = 152) every 2 weeks (in the MONARCH trial; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02332590) or sarilumab 150 mg, sarilumab 200 mg, or placebo every 2 weeks plus methotrexate (MTX) (n = 401, n = 396, and n = 397, respectively) (in the MOBILITY trial; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01061736). Efficacy and patient‐reported outcomes were compared between and within groups according to IL‐6 tertile using linear and logistic regression. Results In MONARCH, patients with high baseline IL‐6 levels (all ≥3 times the upper limit of normal; n = 100) had higher disease activity at baseline than those with low IL‐6 levels (n = 100). The magnitude of clinical improvement over 24 weeks with sarilumab versus adalimumab was greater in patients with high compared to those with low baseline IL‐6 levels. In MOBILITY, compared to patients with low IL‐6 levels (n = 397), patients with high IL‐6 levels (n = 398) had higher disease activity and joint damage at baseline, were more likely to have joint progression, and had less clinical improvement over 52 weeks’ treatment with placebo plus MTX compared to sarilumab 150 mg or 200 mg plus MTX. Baseline IL‐6 and C‐reactive protein levels were both predictive of outcomes. Safety profiles were similar between defined IL‐6 tertiles. Conclusion IL‐6 may be a prognostic marker of disease progression and severity, and patients with high IL‐6 levels may be likely to benefit from sarilumab compared to adalimumab or MTX. Prospective validation is warranted to confirm the results of these post hoc analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ernest Choy
- Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
| | | | | | - Gordon Lam
- Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kerschbaumer A, Sepriano A, Smolen JS, van der Heijde D, Dougados M, van Vollenhoven R, McInnes IB, Bijlsma JWJ, Burmester GR, de Wit M, Falzon L, Landewé R. Efficacy of pharmacological treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature research informing the 2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2020; 79:744-759. [PMID: 32033937 PMCID: PMC7286044 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 143] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2019] [Revised: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To inform the 2019 update of the European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS A systematic literature research (SLR) to investigate the efficacy of any disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) (conventional synthetic (cs)DMARD, biological (b) and biosimilar DMARD, targeted synthetic (ts)DMARD) or glucocorticoid (GC) therapy in patients with RA was done by searching MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library for articles published between 2016 and 8 March 2019. RESULTS 234 abstracts were selected for detailed assessment, with 136 finally included. They comprised the efficacy of bDMARDs versus placebo or other bDMARDs, efficacy of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (JAKi) across different patient populations and head-to-head of different bDMARDs versus JAKi or other bDMARDs. Switching of bDMARDs to other bDMARDs or tsDMARDs, strategic trials and tapering studies of bDMARDs, csDMARDs and JAKi were assessed. The drugs evaluated included abatacept, adalimumab, ABT-122, baricitinib, certolizumab pegol, SBI-087, CNTO6785, decernotinib, etanercept, filgotinib, golimumab, GCs, GS-9876, guselkumab, hydroxychloroquine, infliximab, leflunomide, mavrilimumab, methotrexate, olokizumab, otilimab, peficitinib, rituximab, sarilumab, salazopyrine, secukinumab, sirukumab, tacrolimus, tocilizumab, tofacitinib, tregalizumab, upadacitinib, ustekinumab and vobarilizumab. The efficacy of many bDMARDs and tsDMARDs was shown. Switching to another tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) or non-TNFi bDMARDs after TNFi treatment failure is efficacious. Tapering of DMARDs is possible in patients achieving long-standing stringent clinical remission; in patients with residual disease activity (including patients in LDA) the risk of flares is increased during the tapering. Biosimilars are non-inferior to their reference products. CONCLUSION This SLR informed the task force regarding the evidence base of various therapeutic regimen for the development of the update of EULAR's RA management recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alexandre Sepriano
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Robert Landewé
- Amsterdam Rheumatology Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gabay C, Burmester GR, Strand V, Msihid J, Zilberstein M, Kimura T, van Hoogstraten H, Boklage SH, Sadeh J, Graham NMH, Boyapati A. Sarilumab and adalimumab differential effects on bone remodelling and cardiovascular risk biomarkers, and predictions of treatment outcomes. Arthritis Res Ther 2020; 22:70. [PMID: 32264972 PMCID: PMC7137491 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-020-02163-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2019] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a pleiotropic cytokine that plays a key role in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Sarilumab is a human monoclonal antibody that binds membrane-bound and soluble IL-6 receptor-α to inhibit IL-6 signalling. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of sarilumab and adalimumab (a tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitor) monotherapy on levels of circulating biomarkers associated with the acute-phase response, bone remodelling, atherothrombosis, anaemia of chronic disease and markers purported to reflect synovial lymphoid and myeloid cell infiltrates, as well as the potential of these biomarkers to differentially predict clinical and patient-reported outcomes with sarilumab vs. adalimumab. Methods In this post hoc analysis, serum samples were analysed at baseline and prespecified post-treatment timepoints up to week 24 in adults with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis intolerant of or inadequate responders to methotrexate from the MONARCH trial (NCT02332590). Results Greater reductions in C-reactive protein (CRP; − 94.0% vs. –24.0%), serum amyloid A (SAA; − 83.2% vs. –17.4%), total receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL; − 18.3% vs. 10.5%) and lipoprotein (a) (− 41.0% vs. –2.8%) were observed at week 24 with sarilumab vs. adalimumab, respectively (adjusted p < 0.0001). Greater increases in procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) were observed with sarilumab vs. adalimumab at week 24 (22.8% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.027). Patients with high baseline SAA, CRP and matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) were more likely to achieve clinical efficacy, including American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria and Disease Activity Score (28 joints)-CRP < 3.2, and report improvements in patient-reported outcomes, including Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index and pain visual analogue scale, with sarilumab than adalimumab. Conclusion Sarilumab was associated with greater positive effects on bone remodelling and decreases in biomarkers of the acute-phase response, synovial inflammation and cardiovascular risk vs. adalimumab. High baseline concentrations of SAA, CRP and MMP-3 are predictive of clinical and patient-reported outcome responses to sarilumab treatment and prospective validation is warranted to confirm these results. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02332590. Registered on 5 January 2015
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cem Gabay
- University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Choy EH. Effect of biologics and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs on fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2020; 58:v51-v55. [PMID: 31682274 PMCID: PMC6827260 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2019] [Revised: 07/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Fatigue is a common and debilitating symptom in patients with RA. Since 2007, fatigue has been included as one of the core outcome measures in RA. Clinical trials of biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) have included fatigue as a secondary endpoint. A Cochrane review in 2016 concluded that the bDMARDs have a moderate effect on improving fatigue in RA. More recent clinical trials of the new biologic agent sarilumab and the Janus kinase inhibitors tofacitinib and baricitinib showed similar benefits. It remains unclear whether the effect of bDMARDs and tsDMARDs on fatigue is mediated by direct effects or through a reduction in inflammation. As fatigue was a secondary endpoint, many analyses did not adjust for potential confounding factors, including pain, mood and anaemia, which is a significant limitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ernest H Choy
- Division of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Nasonov EL, Lila AM. The efficacy and safety of sarilumab, fully human monoclonal antibodies against interleukin 6 receptor, in rheumatoid arthritis: new evidence. Naučno-praktičeskaâ revmatologiâ 2019. [DOI: 10.14412/1995-4484-2019-564-57] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- E. L. Nasonov
- V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology; Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia; I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Ministry of Health of Russia
| | - A. M. Lila
- V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology; Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Burmester GR, Strand V, Rubbert-Roth A, Amital H, Raskina T, Gómez-Centeno A, Pena-Rossi C, Gervitz L, Thangavelu K, St John G, Boklage S, Genovese MC. Safety and efficacy of switching from adalimumab to sarilumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the ongoing MONARCH open-label extension. RMD Open 2019; 5:e001017. [PMID: 31673415 PMCID: PMC6802992 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2019] [Revised: 09/04/2019] [Accepted: 09/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Evaluate open-label sarilumab monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis switching from adalimumab monotherapy in MONARCH (NCT02332590); assess long-term safety and efficacy in patients continuing sarilumab during open-label extension (OLE). Methods During the 48-week OLE, patients received sarilumab 200 mg subcutaneously once every 2 weeks. Safety (March 2017 cut-off) and efficacy, including patient-reported outcomes, were evaluated. Results In the double-blind phase, patients receiving sarilumab or adalimumab monotherapy showed meaningful improvements in disease activity; sarilumab was superior to adalimumab for improving signs, symptoms and physical function. Overall, 320/369 patients completing the 24-week double-blind phase entered OLE (155 switched from adalimumab; 165 continued sarilumab). Sarilumab safety profile was consistent with previous reports. Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between groups; no unexpected safety signals emerged in the first 10 weeks postswitch. Among switch patients, improvement in disease activity was evident at OLE week 12: 47.1%/34.8% had changes ≥1.2 in Disease Activity Score (28 joints) (DAS28)-erythrocyte sedimentation rate/DAS28-C-reactive protein. In switch patients achieving low disease activity (LDA: Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) ≤10; Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) ≤11) by OLE week 24, 70.7%/69.5% sustained CDAI/SDAI LDA at both OLE weeks 36 and 48. Proportions of switch patients achieving CDAI ≤2.8 and SDAI ≤3.3 by OLE week 24 increased through OLE week 48. Improvements postswitch approached continuation-group values, including scores ≥normative values. Conclusions During this OLE, there were no unexpected safety issues in patients switching from adalimumab to sarilumab monotherapy, and disease activity improved in many patients. Patients continuing sarilumab reported safety consistent with prolonged use and had sustained benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerd R Burmester
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité – Medical University Berlin, Free University, and Humboldt University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Vibeke Strand
- Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | | | - Howard Amital
- Department of Medicine ‘B’ and Zabludowicz Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | - Tatiana Raskina
- Faculty of Therapeutics, Kemerovo State Medical Academy of Roszdrav, Kemerovo, Russian Federation
| | | | | | - Leon Gervitz
- Medical Operations and Effectiveness, Sanofi Genzyme, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Gregory St John
- Medical Affairs, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Tarrytown, New York, USA
| | - Susan Boklage
- Medical Affairs, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Tarrytown, New York, USA
| | - Mark C Genovese
- Immunology and Rheumatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Karkhur S, Hasanreisoglu M, Vigil E, Halim MS, Hassan M, Plaza C, Nguyen NV, Afridi R, Tran AT, Do DV, Sepah YJ, Nguyen QD. Interleukin-6 inhibition in the management of non-infectious uveitis and beyond. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect 2019; 9:17. [PMID: 31523783 PMCID: PMC6745304 DOI: 10.1186/s12348-019-0182-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2019] [Accepted: 08/02/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Uveitis consists of a spectrum of inflammatory disorders characterized by ocular inflammation. The underlying pathophysiology consists of a complex interplay of various inflammatory pathways. Interleukin 6 is an important mediator of inflammation in uveitis and constitutes focus of research toward development of newer biological therapies in the management of non-infectious uveitis. Main body Pan-blockade of the inflammatory pathways with steroids is generally the first step in the management of acute non-infectious uveitis. However, long-term therapy with steroids is associated with systemic and ocular side effects, thereby necessitating the need for development of steroid sparing agents. IL-6 is a cytokine produced by various immune cells, in response to molecular patterns and affects multiple inflammatory cells. In particular, IL-6 is involved in differentiation of CD-4 cells into Th-17 cells that have been shown to play a significant role in various immune-mediated diseases such as uveitis. This broad-spectrum immunomodulatory activity makes IL-6 an excellent target for immunomodulatory therapy. Tocilizumab was the first IL-6 inhibitor to demonstrate efficacy in humans. It inhibits IL-6 from binding to both membrane-bound and soluble receptor and can be administered via intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) routes. It has been FDA approved for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Following the approval in systemic diseases, its efficacy was demonstrated in various uveitis studies including a phase 2 clinical trial (STOP-Uveitis). Overall, tocilizumab has shown a good safety profile with the risk of malignancy consistent with that expected in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. However, tocilizumab therapy has been shown to increase the risk for gastrointestinal perforation and dose-dependent neutropenia. Following the success of tocilizumab, several other agents targeting the IL-6 pathway are in the pipeline. These include sirukumab, siltuximab, olokizumab, clazakizumab, and EBI-031 which target IL-6; Sarilumab and ALX-0061 act on the IL-6 receptor. Conclusion Studies have shown that IL-6 inhibitors can be effective in the management of NIU. In addition, the levels of IL-6 are elevated in other ocular vascular diseases such as retinal vein occlusion and diabetic macular edema. The roles of IL-6 inhibition may be broadened in the future to include the management of retinal vascular diseases and non-uveitic macular edema.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samendra Karkhur
- Byers Eye Institute, Spencer Center for Vision Research, Stanford University, 2370 Watson Court, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94303, USA.,Department of Ophthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Murat Hasanreisoglu
- Byers Eye Institute, Spencer Center for Vision Research, Stanford University, 2370 Watson Court, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94303, USA.,Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Erin Vigil
- Byers Eye Institute, Spencer Center for Vision Research, Stanford University, 2370 Watson Court, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94303, USA.,University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Muhammad Sohail Halim
- Byers Eye Institute, Spencer Center for Vision Research, Stanford University, 2370 Watson Court, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94303, USA
| | - Muhammad Hassan
- Byers Eye Institute, Spencer Center for Vision Research, Stanford University, 2370 Watson Court, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94303, USA
| | - Carlos Plaza
- Byers Eye Institute, Spencer Center for Vision Research, Stanford University, 2370 Watson Court, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94303, USA.,Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Universitario de León, León, Spain
| | - Nam V Nguyen
- Byers Eye Institute, Spencer Center for Vision Research, Stanford University, 2370 Watson Court, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94303, USA.,University of Nebraska, Lincoln, USA
| | - Rubbia Afridi
- Byers Eye Institute, Spencer Center for Vision Research, Stanford University, 2370 Watson Court, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94303, USA
| | - Anh T Tran
- Byers Eye Institute, Spencer Center for Vision Research, Stanford University, 2370 Watson Court, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94303, USA
| | - Diana V Do
- Byers Eye Institute, Spencer Center for Vision Research, Stanford University, 2370 Watson Court, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94303, USA
| | - Yasir J Sepah
- Byers Eye Institute, Spencer Center for Vision Research, Stanford University, 2370 Watson Court, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94303, USA
| | - Quan Dong Nguyen
- Byers Eye Institute, Spencer Center for Vision Research, Stanford University, 2370 Watson Court, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94303, USA.
| |
Collapse
|