Symptom Burden and Self-Advocacy: Exploring the Relationship Among Female Cancer Survivors

Symptom perception and self-care practice for uraemic pruritus in patients receiving haemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Due to the recurrent nature of uraemic pruritus among patients receiving haemodialysis, self-care can offer patients a means to ameliorate this symptom. Qualitative data on self-care of uraemic pruritus are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To explore how patients on haemodialysis perceive uraemic pruritus, implement self-care practice, and appraise the outcome of self-caring uraemic pruritus.

DESIGN

The Common Sense Model of Self-Regulation guided the study design.

PARTICIPANTS AND APPROACHES

Data were collected through face-to-face interviews with 30 patients receiving haemodialysis who were aged from 50 to 89 years and had had uraemic pruritus for more than 6 weeks. Interviews were audio recorded, and verbatim transcriptions of interviews were analysed.

FINDINGS

Our participants generally used life-related analogies to describe uraemic pruritus, which they reviewed as a momentarily controllable symptom with an endless timeline. Most participants reported limited knowledge of the aetiology and multifaceted impacts of uraemic pruritus on their daily life and emotional status. The impacts on daily life included decreased zest for activities and sleep disturbances. Physical management of uraemic pruritus involved daily substance use and interventions employed during pruritic episodes. Psychological managements involved preferences for indoor activities and a fatalistic outlook. Unsatisfactory outcomes and psychological burdens from self-care practice were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Life experiences shape symptom presentation and self-care practice in patients on haemodialysis. The modalities for self-caring for uraemic pruritus are diverse but not remarkably effective. Performing self-care tasks places a substantial burden on patients. Individualised educational programs should be developed to improve the outcome of self-care practice.

Cancer coping self-efficacy, symptoms and their relationship with quality of life among cancer survivors

PURPOSE

Cancer coping self-efficacy refers to an individual's confidence in dealing with challenges from cancer-related events, and a positive association with quality of life (QoL) has been demonstrated. Considering unresolved physical and psychological symptoms at the survivorship phase, which are known to worsen QoL, the association between cancer coping self-efficacy and QoL needs to be evaluated controlling for known contributing factors of QoL. This study aimed to describe cancer survivors' cancer coping self-efficacy, symptoms and their relationship with QoL.

METHODS

A descriptive correlational study was conducted. Participants were cancer survivors who completed intended treatment except for hormone therapy (N = 240). Cancer coping self-efficacy, symptoms, and QoL were measured. To evaluate the association of cancer survivors' cancer coping self-efficacy with QoL, correlation and multiple regression analysis were conducted.

RESULTS

Cancer coping self-efficacy demonstrated a significant positive association with QoL. Symptoms had a significant negative association with QoL. Fully active cancer survivors demonstrated significantly better QoL than those with functional deterioration. Self-efficacy for using spiritual coping had a significant positive association with QoL, along with symptoms and functional status, which explained 37.5% of QoL.

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer survivors' QoL was related to spiritual coping self-efficacy, symptoms and functional status. Improving spiritual coping self-efficacy and managing symptoms reflecting survivors' functional status need to be integrated into survivorship care.

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a scoping review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to identify and evaluate the use of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System in patients with gastrointestinal cancer, as well as provide references for analyzing treatment outcomes, gauging prognostic risk, and assessing clinical symptoms and function in gastrointestinal cancer patients.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, ProQuest, Embase, and CINAHL were systematically searched using keywords and controlled vocabulary through January 2023.

RESULTS

The scoping review collected 30 studies published from 2012 to 2022, including observational studies (n = 21), interventional studies (n = 4), and mixed studies (n = 5). Outcome indicators included mood, pain, fatigue, sleep, the ability to perform activities of daily living, social functioning, and other health problems.

CONCLUSION

Being a self-report questionnaire, the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System offers a full assessment of patient's symptoms and quality of life, and accurately captures their actual thoughts, feelings, and experiences. Individuals with gastrointestinal cancer made frequent use of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System to provide an accurate measure of their health status.

Predictors of patient self-advocacy among patients with chronic heart failure

The purpose of this study was to examine predictors of self-advocacy among patients with chronic heart failure (HF) as they were unknown. A convenience sample of 80 participants recruited from one Midwestern HF clinic completed surveys related to relationship-based predictors of patient self-advocacy including trust in nurses and social support. Self-advocacy is operationalized using the three dimensions of HF knowledge, assertiveness, and intentional non-adherence. Hierarchical multiple regression was used showing that trust in nurses predicted HF knowledge (ΔR² = 0.070, F = 5.91, p < .05), social support predicted advocacy assertiveness (ΔR² = 0.068, F = 5.67, p < .05), and ethnicity predicted overall self-advocacy (ΔR² = 0.059, F = 4.89, p < .05). These findings suggest that support from family and friends can give the patient the needed encouragement to advocate for what they need. A trusting relationship with nurses impacts patient education so that patients not only understand their illness and its trajectory but also use that understanding to speak up for themselves. African American patients, who are less likely to self-advocate than their White counterparts, could benefit from nurses recognizing the impact of implicit bias so that these patients do not feel silenced in their care.

Self-advocacy Behaviors and Needs in Women with Advanced Cancer: Assessment and Differences by Patient Characteristics

BACKGROUND

Self-advocacy skills allow individuals with cancer to overcome challenges related to their health, care, and well-being. Understanding the self-advocacy behaviors and needs of individuals with cancer is critical to addressing the lack of evidence-based self-advocacy interventions. The aims of this study are to describe (1) self-advocacy behaviors and needs of women with advanced cancer and (2) associations between self-advocacy and sociodemographic, cancer, and patient-reported outcomes.

METHODS

We analyzed cross-sectional data from a clinical trial among women within 3 months of a metastatic breast or stage III or IV gynecologic cancer diagnosis. Descriptive and correlational statistics and tests of group difference were calculated for measures of self-advocacy (Female Self-Advocacy in Cancer Survivorship Scale), sociodemographic characteristics, quality of life (FACT-G), symptom burden (M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory), and mood (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale).

RESULTS

Participants (N = 78) reported self-advocacy behaviors including making decisions based on their priorities, asking questions to their healthcare providers, and comparing their experiences to others' experiences. Self-advocacy needs focused on finding health information and talking with healthcare providers. Self-advocacy behaviors and needs did not differ by participants' sociodemographic characteristics or mood. Higher self-advocacy behaviors were associated with higher quality of life (p ≤ .01) and lower symptom severity (p < .05) with a trend for cancer recurrence (p = .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Women with advanced cancer report engaging in self-advocacy behaviors and these are associated with higher quality of life and lower symptom burden. Future research should determine if self-advocacy behaviors and needs change over time and how patient characteristics impact self-advocacy behaviors and needs.

"I was never one of those people who just jumped right in for me": patient perspectives on self-advocacy training for women with advanced cancer

PURPOSE

Patients with advanced cancer experience many complicated situations that can make self-advocacy (defined as the ability speak up for yourself in the face of a challenge) difficult. Few self-advocacy interventions exist, and most are atheoretical with minimal patient engagement. The purpose of this study is to describe participant perspectives of a novel, self-advocacy serious game intervention called Strong Together.

METHODS

This was a qualitative cross-sectional descriptive study among women receiving cancer care at an academic cancer center within 3 months of an advanced gynecologic or breast cancer diagnosis. Participants randomized to receive the intervention completed one-on-one semi-structured interviews 3-months post Strong Together and had the option to share voice journals about their experiences. Inductive qualitative approaches were used to descriptively analyze transcripts and voice journals. Descriptive content analysis approaches were used to group similar codes together into themes summarizing participants' experiences engaging with the Strong Together intervention.

RESULTS

Participants (N = 40) reported that the Strong Together intervention was acceptable, noting that it was realistic and reflective of their personal experiences. Overarching themes included seeing myself in most scenarios and wanting more content; giving me the go ahead to expect more; offering ideas for how to stand up for myself; reinforcing what I am already doing; and reminding me of what I have. Participants suggested adding additional content including diverse characters.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that women with advanced cancer were receptive to a self-advocacy skills-building intervention. Future research should explore the mechanisms linking serious games to learning and health outcomes.

How does patient-centered communication in ovarian cancer care enhance patient well-being? A mixed methods study

OBJECTIVE

Greater perceived patient-centered communication (PCC) is associated with better health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with ovarian cancer. Quantitative measures of PCC and HRQoL do little to explain this association. We interviewed patients with high and low ratings of PCC to understand how it is associated with HRQoL.

METHODS

Explanatory sequential mixed methods study. Participants were English-speaking U.S. adults with ovarian cancer. We assessed PCC with the Patient-Centered Communication - Cancer (PCC-Ca)-36 (possible score range 1-5; higher scores represent greater patient-centeredness), and purposively sampled 14 participants with total scores in the top and bottom quartiles. Participants completed individual, semi-structured interviews about their communication experiences. Guided by the National Cancer Institute Framework for PCC in Cancer Care, we analyzed interview transcripts using directed content analysis. We integrated survey and interview findings in a joint display.

RESULTS

Among 176 survey respondents, PCC-Ca-36 total scores ranged from 1.7 to 5.0. Participants with scores in the top quartile (4.8-5.0) perceived clinicians as proactive and attentive to psychosocial concerns. Those with scores in the bottom quartile (1.7-3.5) described not feeling known as an individual and receiving limited support for self-management.

CONCLUSIONS

The association between PCC and QoL may be partially explained by differences in perceived support for psychosocial concerns and self-management. PCC may facilitate receipt of proactive, personalized care.

Identifying Barriers to Advocacy Among Patients With Lung Cancer: The Role of Stigma-Related Interpersonal Constraint

OBJECTIVES

To examine whether aspects of disease-specific stigma are barriers to advocacy among individuals with lung cancer.

SAMPLE & SETTING

266 patients with lung cancer treated at two National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer centers in the United States.

METHODS & VARIABLES

Patients completed a cross-sectional survey. Demographic, clinical, and stigma-related correlates of advocacy were also explored.

RESULTS

In multivariable analyses, lower levels of patient advocacy were reported by older patients and those with higher levels of constrained disclosure (i.e., avoidance of or discomfort in disclosing one's lung cancer status).

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Avoidance of discussing lung cancer (constrained disclosure) may be a barrier to patient involvement in advocacy. Additional research is needed to examine this relationship, reduce stigma, and promote inclusivity for individuals with lung cancer.

Oncology Nurses' Role in Promoting Patient Self-Advocacy

Teaching patients with cancer the skill of self-advocacy shifts the focus of their cancer care onto what is important to them, leading to optimized patient-centered care. As oncology nurses, providing support to patients as they self-advocate to get their needs met fosters a collaborative relationship, creating an environment in which patients feel comfortable verbalizing their needs and concerns.

"I pretty much followed the law, and there weren't any decisions to make": A qualitative study of self-advocacy experiences of men with cancer

Current conceptualizations of patient self-advocacy focus on women with cancer, leaving knowledge of male self-advocacy deficient. The purpose of this study is to describe the key components of self-advocacy among men with cancer. Adult (≥18 years old) men with a history of invasive cancer were recruited from cancer clinics and registries. Trained researchers led individual semi-structured interviews regarding participants' challenges, how they overcame those challenges, and barriers and facilitators to their self-advocacy. All interviews were analyzed using descriptive content analysis methods and synthesized into major themes. These themes were refined after receiving feedback from key stakeholders. Participants (N = 28) reported three major self-advocacy themes: (i) managing through information and planning; (ii) finding the best team and falling in line; and (iii) strategic social connections. These themes are richly described with representative quotations for each theme and subtheme. Based on these findings, existing models of patient self-advocacy should be adjusted to encompass how men self-advocate. Clinicians should consider how gender may impact how and why patients with cancer self-advocate so that they can best support their patients in achieving patient-centered care.

A Conceptual Framework of Self-advocacy in Women With Cancer

Researchers define self-advocacy as the ability of an individual with cancer to overcome challenges in getting their preferences, needs, and values met. While imperative in all health care settings, self-advocacy is especially important in cancer care. The goal of this article is to present a conceptual framework for self-advocacy in cancer. We review foundational studies in self-advocacy, define the elements of the conceptual framework, discuss underlying assumptions of the framework, and suggest future directions in this research area. This framework provides an empirical and conceptual basis for studies designed to understand and improve self-advocacy among women with cancer.