Phase II trial of vinorelbine/doxorubicin as first-line therapy of advanced breast cancer

Fibronectin-targeted dual-acting micelles for combination therapy of metastatic breast cancer

Stage IV breast cancer, which has a high risk of invasion, often develops into metastases in distant organs, especially in the lung, and this could threaten the lives of women. Thus, the development of more advanced therapeutics that can efficiently target metastatic foci is crucial. In this study, we built an dual-acting therapeutic strategy using micelles with high stability functionalized with fibronectin-targeting CREKA peptides encapsulating two slightly soluble chemotherapy agents in water, doxorubicin (D) and vinorelbine (V), which we termed C-DVM. We found that small C-DVM micelles could efficiently codeliver drugs into 4T1 cells and disrupt microtubule structures. C-DVM also exhibited a powerful ability to eradicate and inhibit invasion of 4T1 cells. Moreover, an in vivo pharmacokinetics study showed that C-DVM increased the drug circulation half-life and led to increased enrichment of drugs in lung metastatic foci after 24 h. Moreover, dual-acting C-DVM treatment led to 90% inhibition of metastatic foci development and reduced invasion of metastases. C-DVM could potentially be used as a targeted treatment for metastasis and represents a new approach with higher therapeutic efficacy than conventional chemotherapy for stage IV breast cancer that could be used in the future.

Cisplatin plus Vinorelbine as a Salvage Regimen in Refractory Breast Cancer

Aims and background

Breast cancer refractory to known effective agents is one of the major clinical problems frequently encountered in practice. Cisplatin and vinorelbine are known to be active drugs in anthracycline-refractory cases. In this phase II study, the effectiveness and tolerability of cisplatin and vinorelbine was investigated when used in combination as a salvage regimen in the treatment of metastatic refractory breast cancer.

Study design

Twenty-four patients with advanced refractory breast cancer who had been previously treated with a regimen containing doxorubicin were included in the study. Six of the 24 patients also received taxanes after failure of doxorubicin. Cisplatin at 80 mg/m2 on day 1 and vinorelbine at 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 were given every 3 weeks.

Results

A total of 98 cycles of chemotherapy was given, with a median of 4/patient. The response rate was 25% (2 [8.3%] complete and 4 [16.7%] partial responses). The median survival rates were 14 months in responders and 5.5 months in nonresponders (P = 0.0282). One complete and one partial response were observed in patients previously treated with paclitaxel (overall response rate, 33%). The median response duration was 12.5 mo (range, 4–21) in complete and 4.5 mo (range, 1.5–13) in the partial response group. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 9 patients, with no toxic deaths. Grade 2-3 nausea and vomiting in 6 patients and grade 1 neuropathy in 1 patient were noted.

Conclusions

Although the number of cases is insufficient to indicate that the combination will be effective, it is noteworthy in consideration of anthracycline and taxane refractory cases. A combination of cisplatin and vinorelbine seems to be a reasonable and acceptable choice as an alternative salvage regimen in such cases.

Epirubicin-Vinorelbine Intravenous Combination Followed by Oral Vinorelbine as First-Line Treatment in Metastatic Breast Cancer

Epirubicin and vinorelbine are considered active drugs in metastatic breast cancer. The optimal duration of a chemotherapy regimen for metastatic breast cancer patients is still unknown. Nevertheless, epirubicin has a dose-limiting cardiotoxicity. Vinorelbine is also available as oral formulation. In a multicenter phase II study, we analyzed the feasibility and the efficacy of a maximum of six cycles of i.v. epirubicin plus vinorelbine, followed by oral vinorelbine. We enrolled 30 patients with metastatic breast cancer. Each patient received epirubicin (75 mg/m2 on day 1) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m2 on days 1–8), every 3 weeks, for three cycles or six cycles in case of objective response or stable disease. When a clinical benefit was obtained, patients received oral vinorelbine (60 mg/m2 on days 1–8 every 3 weeks for three cycles). The regimen demonstrated to be active and well tolerated in metastatic breast cancer, and 6–8 months represented the optimal treatment duration. Maintenance therapy with oral vinorelbine was feasible, effective, safe and well accepted by the patients.

Prognostic factors of survival in pathologic incomplete response patients with locally advanced breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

The study aims to identify clinical and pathological factors predictive of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) patients who do not have a pathologic complete response (no-pCR) of primary tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) with vinorelbine/epirubicin (VE) intravenous combination regimen. Retrospectively reviewed data of LABC patients in our Hospital. 97 patients who had no-pCR after NC were identified and enrolled in the study. All patients were treated with three cycles of VE intravenous administration before operation. Local-regional radiotherapy was offered to patients after the completion of chemotherapy followed by hormone therapy according to hormone receptor status. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of intravenous vinorelbine 25 mg/m on day 1 and 8 plus epirubicin 60 mg/m on day 1 was administered every 3 weeks. The relationship of survival with clinical and pathological factors was evaluated. Univariate analysis (log-rank tests) and multivariate analysis (Cox regression analysis) were performed to identify independent predictors for DFS and OS. Study was analyzed with a median follow-up of 65 months. The 5-year rates for DFS and OS were 58.0 and 68.5 %, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that three factors such as the estrogen receptor expression before NC (pre-ER), Ki-67 expression after NC (post-Ki-67), and pathological response of primary tumor (pRT) were independent prognostic factors of LABC patients (pre-ER and pRT for DFS, all three for OS). The DFS at 5 years was 73.8 % for patients without both factors, 51.5 % for patients with any one of both factors, and 10.3 % for patients with both factors. The OS at 5 years was 90.5 % for patients without these three factors, 64.3 % for patients with any one of these three factors, and 30.8 % for patients with any two of these three factors. Patients with all three factors died within 3 years. In LABC patients with no-pCR, three factors independently predicted of survival and, without those three high-risk factors, patients had the promising outcome.

Phase II interventional study (N0337) of capecitabine in combination with vinorelbine and trastuzumab for first- or second-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a north central cancer treatment group trial

BACKGROUND

We conducted a multiinstitutional phase II study of capecitabine in combination with vinorelbine and trastuzumab in patients eligible to receive first- or second-line treatment for human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-positive (HER2(+)) metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study was designed to test that the true confirmed response rate (CRR) was at most 45% vs. a true CRR of at least 65%. Between March 2005 and June 2008, eligible patients received capecitabine 825 mg/m² orally on days 1 to 14, vinorelbine 25 mg/m² intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, and trastuzumab 8 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 week 1 and 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks. The main outcome measure was CRR.

RESULTS

Of 47 women accrued, 45 were evaluable. This design required at least 25 confirmed responses in the 45 evaluable patients for the treatment to be considered promising. Thirty women (67%) achieved a confirmed response; 25 women (56%) had a confirmed partial response (PR); 5 women (11%) had confirmed complete responses (CRs). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.4-16.7 months). Median overall survival was 28.5 months (95% CI, 24.8-36.4 months).

CONCLUSIONS

This triplet combination demonstrated promising activity in patients with HER2(+) MBC.

A multicenter prospective phase II randomized trial of epirubicin/vinorelbine versus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/vinorelbine as first-line treatment in advanced breast cancer. A GOIM study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate activity and tolerability of two anthracycline-containing regimens as first-line treatment for anthracycline-naïve relapsed breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Patients with relapsed breast cancer not previously treated with adjuvant anthracyclines were randomly assigned to epirubicin/vinorelbine (arm A: EPI/VNB, EPI 90 mg/m2 on day 1, VNB 25 mg/m2 on days 1,5 plus G-CSF subcutaneously on days 7-12, with cycles repeated every 21 days), or to pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/VNB (arm B: PLD/VNB, PLD 40 mg/m2 on day 1, VNB 30 mg/m2 on days 1, 15, with cycles repeated every 4 weeks). Primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of the two regimens in terms of response rate, secondarily toxicity, progression free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

One hundred and four patients have been enrolled (arm A 54, arm B 50): characteristics were well balanced between the 2 arms. Responses were as follows: arm A, 3 (5.6%) CR, 20 (37%) PR, (ORR 42.6%, 95%CI 29.3%-55.9%); arm B, 8 (16%) CR, 18 (36%) PR, (ORR 52%, 95%CI 38.2%-65.8%). Median progression free survival was 10.7 months in arm A (95% CI, 8.7-12.6), and 8.8 months in arm B (95% CI, 7.1-10.5). Median overall survival was 34.6 months in arm A (95%CI, 19.5-49.8) and 24.8 months in arm B (95%CI, 15.7-33.9). As toxicity concerns, both treatment regimens were well tolerated; myelosuppression was the dose-limiting toxicity, with G3-4 neutropenia occurring in 18.5% and 22% of the patients of arm A and B, respectively. No relevant differences in main toxic effects have been observed between the two arms, except for alopecia, more common in arm A, and cutaneous toxicity, observed only in arm B. No clinical congestive heart failures have been observed, one case of tachyarrhythmia was reported after the last EPI/VNB cycle, and two reversible ≥ 20% LVEF decreases have been observed in arm A.

CONCLUSIONS

Both anthracycline- containing regimens evaluated in the present study seem to be active and with a satisfactory tolerability in anthracycline-naïve relapsed breast cancer patients.

Incidence of chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea associated with epirubicin, docetaxel and navelbine in younger breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The rates of chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea (CIA) associated with docetaxel-based regimens reported by previous studies are discordant. For navelbine-based chemotherapies, rates of CIA have seldom been reported.

METHODS

Of 170 premenopausal patients recruited between January 2003 and September 2008, 78 were treated with fluorouracil plus epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC), 66 were treated with docetaxel plus epirubicin (TE), and 26 were treated with navelbine plus epirubicin (NE). Patient follow-up was carried up every 3-4 months during the first year, then every 9-12 months during subsequent years.

RESULTS

In univariate analysis, the rates of CIA were 44.87% for the FEC regimen, 30.30% for the TE regimen and 23.08% for the NE regimen (P = 0.068). Significant differences in the rates of CIA were not found between the FEC and TE treatment groups (P > 0.05), but were found between the FEC and NE treatment groups (P < 0.05). Furthermore, no significant differences were found between the TE and NE regimens (P > 0.05). Tamoxifen use was a significant predictor for CIA (P = 0.001), and age was also a significant predictor (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, age (P < 0.001), the type of chemotherapy regimens (P = 0.009) and tamoxifen use (P = 0.003) were all significant predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

Age and administration of tamoxifen were found to be significant predictive factors of CIA, whereas docetaxel and navelbine based regimens were not associated with higher rates of CIA than epirubicin-based regimen.

Immunotherapy of metastatic breast cancer patients with vitamin D-binding protein-derived macrophage activating factor (GcMAF)

Serum vitamin D3-binding protein (Gc protein) is the precursor for the principal macrophage activating factor (MAF). The MAF precursor activity of serum Gc protein of breast cancer patients was lost or reduced because Gc protein was deglycosylated by serum alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase (Nagalase) secreted from cancerous cells. Patient serum Nagalase activity is proportional to tumor burden. The deglycosylated Gc protein cannot be converted to MAF, resulting in no macrophage activation and immunosuppression. Stepwise incubation of purified Gc protein with immobilized beta-galactosidase and sialidase generated probably the most potent macrophage activating factor (termed GcMAF) ever discovered, which produces no adverse effect in humans. Macrophages treated in vitro with GcMAF (100 pg/ml) are highly tumoricidal to mammary adenocarcinomas. Efficacy of GcMAF for treatment of metastatic breast cancer was investigated with 16 nonanemic patients who received weekly administration of GcMAF (100 ng). As GcMAF therapy progresses, the MAF precursor activity of patient Gc protein increased with a concomitant decrease in serum Nagalase. Because of proportionality of serum Nagalase activity to tumor burden, the time course progress of GcMAF therapy was assessed by serum Nagalase activity as a prognostic index. These patients had the initial Nagalase activities ranging from 2.32 to 6.28 nmole/min/mg protein. After about 16-22 administrations (approximately 3.5-5 months) of GcMAF, these patients had insignificantly low serum enzyme levels equivalent to healthy control enzyme levels, ranging from 0.38 to 0.63 nmole/min/mg protein, indicating eradication of the tumors. This therapeutic procedure resulted in no recurrence for more than 4 years.

Epirubicin-vinorelbine vs FEC100 for node-positive, early breast cancer: French Adjuvant Study Group 09 trial

The aim of the study was to compare our reference adjuvant chemotherapy, FEC100 (fluorouracil 500 mg m⁻², epirubicin 100 mg m⁻² and cyclophosphamide 500 mg m⁻², six cycles every 21 days), to an epirubicin–vinorelbine (Epi-Vnr) combination for early, poor-prognosis breast cancer patients. Patients (482) were randomised to receive FEC100, or Epi-Vnr (epirubicin 50 mg m⁻² day 1 and vinorelbine 25 mg m⁻², days 1 and 8, six cycles every 21 days). The 7-year disease-free survival rates were 59.4 and 58.8%, respectively (P=0.47). The relative dose intensity of planned epirubicin doses was 89.1% with FEC100 and 88.9% with Epi-Vnr. There were significantly more grades 3–4 neutropenia (P=0.009) with Epi-Vnr, and significantly more nausea-vomiting (P<0.0001), stomatitis (P=0.0007) and alopecia (P<0.0001) with FEC100. No cases of congestive heart failure were reported, whereas four decreases in left ventricular ejection fraction occurred after FEC100 and five after Epi-Vnr. One case of acute myeloblastic leukaemia was registered in the FEC100 arm. After 7 years of follow-up, there was no difference between treatment arms. Epi-Vnr regimen provided a good efficacy in such poor-prognosis breast cancer patients, and could be an alternative to FEC100, taking into account respective safety profiles of both regimens.

A Phase II Trial of Vinorelbine and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Patients With Pretreated Metastatic Breast Cancer

The objective of the present study is to investigate the clinical efficacy and tolerance of vinorelbine and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with prior taxane and/or anthracycline treatment. A total of 25 patients who previously received taxane- and/or anthracycline-based chemotherapy as first- and/or second-line treatment of MBC were entered into the study and were treated with 20 mg/m2 vinorelbine on day 1 and 8 and 30 mg/m2 PLD on day 1 every 3 weeks. All were evaluated for efficacy, quality of life, and tolerance. Three complete and 6 partial responses were observed in 25 patients for an objective response rate of 36% (95% confidence interval: 17-55%). Eight patients (32%) had stable disease of not less than 3 months and 8 patients (32%) had disease progression. The median progression-free survival was 6.7 months (range, 2-18 months), and the median overall survival was 13.2 months (range, 3-31 months). Severe toxicities (grade 3 or above) were neutropenia (16%) and mucositis (8%). The health-related quality of life assessed before each cycle by specific questionnaire did not differ significantly over the treatment period. The combination of vinorelbine and PLD for anthracycline- and/or taxane-pretreated patients with MBC is an active and safe regimen that does not compromise the quality of life.

Multidisciplinary Therapy of Locally Far‐Advanced or Inflammatory Breast Cancer with Fixed Perioperative Sequence of Epirubicin, Vinorelbine, and Fluorouracil Chemotherapy, Surgery, and Radiotherapy: Long‐Term Results

BACKGROUND

Based on phase II data in advanced breast cancer (BC), the fluorouracil, epirubicin, and vinorelbine (FEN) combination was assessed as perioperative chemotherapy, integrated in a multidisciplinary treatment for locally advanced BC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed inoperable (stage IIIB or inflammatory) BC. Multimodality treatment protocol consisted of four preoperative courses of fluorouracil (600 mg/m(2) day 1), epirubicin (75 mg/m(2) day 1), and vinorelbine (25 mg/m(2) day1 and day 8), all i.v. every 21 days, followed by radical or conservative surgery according to clinical response and four postoperative identical chemotherapy courses aimed to eradicate micrometastatic disease. Locoregional radiotherapy was offered to all patients after the completion of chemotherapy followed by hormonotherapy according to hormone receptor status. The primary end points of the study were: (a) clinical and pathological response, (b) downstaging and conversion to operable disease, and (c) recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Forty-eight women, one stage IIIA, 27 (56.2%) stage IIIB, two stage IIIC (4.1%), and 12 (25%) with inflammatory BC, aged 34-75 years (median, 52), were accrued. Thirty-eight and 34 patients completed the planned pre- and postoperative chemotherapy, respectively. Totals of 175 and 135 cycles were administered pre- and postoperatively, respectively. Toxicity of both phases, mainly hematologic, was in general acceptable without treatment-related death. Venous reactions were a frequent problem. All but three tumors were converted to operable, 31.3% with breast conservation. The clinical response rate (RR) was 77.7% (22.2% complete) and pathological RR was 73.3% (complete, 20% in both primary and axilla). After a median follow-up of 72 months, 62.5% and 16.7% of patients remain relapse free at 3 and 5 years, respectively, while 83% and 58.3% were alive 3 and 5 years, respectively, after the start of chemotherapy. Median RFS and OS have not yet been reached, and are currently 37+ and 62+ months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This fixed number of FEN perioperative courses schedule followed by radiotherapy is safe and highly active in inducing both local and distant control of locally far-advanced BC. This strategy is at least not inferior to other established regimens or strategies for locally far-advanced BC, while the integration of taxanes or new targeted agents may help show its true value for this challenging clinical entity.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in combination with vinorelbine as salvage treatment in pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer: a multicentre phase II study

PURPOSE

To investigate the activity and tolerance of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in combination with vinorelbine in pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND TREATMENT

Thirty-six women with metastatic breast cancer were enrolled. The median age was 64 years, 80% of the patients had a performance status of 0-1, 30 (83%) had visceral disease and 83% had received prior taxanes while 50% anthracyclines. Treatment consisted of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (40 mg/m2 on day 1) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15) every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

In an intention-to-treat analysis 2 (6%) complete and 12 (33%) partial responses were observed (overall response rate 39%; 95% CI: 23-54.8%); 8 (22%) and 14 (39%) patients experienced stable and progressive disease, respectively. The median TTP was 6.5 months and the median survival time 14.2 months. The 1-year survival rate was 54.1%. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 21 (58%) patients, grade 3-4 anemia in four (11%) and grade 4 thrombocytopenia in one (3%). Two (6%) patients developed febrile neutropenia. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild and easily manageable. There was no clinically important cardiac toxicity or treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and vinorelbine is an active and well tolerated salvage regimen in patients with metastatic breast cancer which merits further evaluation.

Vinorelbine in the management of breast cancer: New perspectives, revived role in the era of targeted therapy

Vinorelbine is a semi-synthetic vinca alkaloid that has been shown active in many tumour types and is currently registered for the treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This agent has a generally favourable safety profile, and may be suitable for use in special populations such as the elderly and/or frail patient. However, with the taxanes firmly established as standard second line treatment for ABC after failure of an anthracycline, vinorelbine has been generally relegated for use as third line therapy, in competition with the oral compound capecitabine. More recently, the exciting results observed with the combination of vinorelbine and trastuzumab in patients with Her-2 overexpressing/amplified tumours, as well as the development of a reliable formulation and revised schedule of oral vinorelbine with proven activity in ABC appear to have revived the interest in this compound in the management of this disease. There are still a number of unanswered questions that will have to be addressed by properly designed, adequately powered randomised clinical trials.

Efficacy and toxicity of vinorelbine with doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide combination chemotherapy in a phase I-II study for advanced or recurrent breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of vinorelbine (VNB) with doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) combination chemotherapy, a phase I-II study was carried out in patients with advanced or recurrent breast cancer.

METHODS

The phase I part of this study was carried out to determine the treatment schedule and acceptable dose of VNB for the phase II study. In phase I, VNB was initially given as a short infusion on days 1, 8 and 15, every 4 weeks. The initial dose of vinorelbine was 15 mg/m2. In the AC regimen, 20 mg/m2 of doxorubicin (ADM) was given intravenously (i.v.) on days 1 and 8, and 100 mg/body of cyclophosphamide (CPA) was administered orally from days 1 to 14. Subsequently, a phase II study was carried out at the maximum acceptable dose (MAD).

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were entered into this study. In patients receiving VNB at a dose of 15 mg/m2, neutropenia (> or = grade 3) frequently occurred on day 15. The treatment schedule of this study was therefore changed to VNB given i.v. on days 1 and 8 with AC combination chemotherapy. In this treatment schedule, grade 4 neutropenia lasting for more than 4 days occurred in patients given VNB at a dose of 20 mg/m2 with AC more frequently than in those given 15 mg/m2 of VNB. Therefore, the MAD of VNB was determined to be 20 mg/m2 in this regimen. At this recommended dose, there were 1 complete (CR) and 8 partial responses (PRs) in 15 patients, with an overall response rate of 60.0%. No treatment-related death occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that VNB plus AC combination chemotherapy was effective and well tolerated for breast cancer patients. A randomized trial of VNB plus AC vs. AC combination chemotherapy may be required to ascertain the benefit of this regimen for advanced or recurrent breast cancer patients.

Comparison of Outcomes of Phase II Studies and Subsequent Randomized Control Studies Using Identical Chemotherapeutic Regimens

Purpose

To determine whether promising results from phase II studies could be reproduced in phase III studies, and to examine which characteristics of phase II studies might be of predictive value for subsequent phase III studies.

Methods

We searched for all phase III studies of chemotherapy in advanced solid malignancies, published in the English language literature from July 1998 to June 2003. Each phase III study was reviewed to identify preceding phase II studies. Phase II and phase III studies included in this analysis must have used identical regimens. Data were extracted from both phase II and phase III studies.

Results

Of 181 phase III studies identified, 43 used therapeutic regimens identical to those in 49 preceding phase II studies. Twelve phase III studies (28%) were “positive.” The vast majority (81%) of phase III studies have lower response rates than preceding phase II studies, with a mean difference of 12.9% among all studies analyzed. None of the phase II study characteristics evaluated significantly predicted for “positive” phase III studies, but the sample size of phase II studies demonstrated a trend toward being predictive (P = .083).

Conclusion

Promising results from phase II studies frequently do not translate into “positive” phase III studies. Response rates in most phase III studies are lower than those in preceding phase II studies.

Phase II study of weekly vinorelbine and 24-h infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer

We prospectively investigated the efficacy and safety of combining weekly vinorelbine (VNB) with weekly 24-h infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in the treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC). Vinorelbine 25 mg m⁻² 30-min intravenous infusion, and high-dose 5-FU 2600 mg m⁻² plus LV 300 mg m⁻² 24-h intravenous infusion (HDFL regimen) were given on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Between June 1999 and April 2003, 40 patients with histologically confirmed recurrent or metastatic breast cancer were enrolled with a median age of 49 years (range: 36–68). A total of 25 patients had recurrent ABC, and 15 patients had primary metastatic diseases. The overall response rate for the intent-to-treat group was 70.0% (95% CI: 54–84%) with eight complete responses and 20 partial responses. All 40 patients were evaluated for survival and toxicities. Among a total of 316 cycles of VNB–HDFL given (average: 7.9: range: 4–14 cycles per patient), the main toxicity was Gr3/4 leucopenia and Gr3/4 neutropenia in 57 (18.0%) and 120 (38.0%) cycles, respectively. Gr1/2 infection and Gr1/2 stomatitis were noted in five (1.6%) and 59 (18.7%) cycles, respectively. None of the patients developed Gr3/4 stomatitis or Gr3/4 infection. Gr2/3 and Gr1 hand–foot syndrome was noted in two (5.0%) and 23 (57.5%) patients, respectively. Gr1 sensory neuropathy developed in three patients. The median time to progression was 8.0 months (range: 3–25.5 months), and the median overall survival was 25.0 months with a follow-up of 5.5 to 45+ months. This VNB–HDFL regimen is a highly active yet well-tolerated first-line treatment for ABC.

Pathological and Clinical Response of a Primary Chemotherapy Regimen Combining Vinorelbine, Epirubicin, and Paclitaxel as Neoadjuvant Treatment in Patients with Operable Breast Cancer

This phase II study investigated the efficacy and tolerability of a primary chemotherapy regimen combining vinorelbine, epirubicin, and paclitaxel (VEP protocol) in women with stage II/III operable breast cancer. Patients (n = 50) were treated with six cycles of VEP according to the following schedule: vinorelbine (Navelbine); Pierre Fabre, Boulogne, France; http://www.pierre-fabre.com) 20 mg/m2, epirubicin (Farmorubicin; Pharmacia, New York, NY; http://www.pnu.com) 35 mg/m2 given on days 1 and 8, paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb, New York, NY; http://www.bmsoncology.com) 175 mg/m2 given on day 9, and G-CSF 5 mg/kg/day given on days 10-20 of a 21-day cycle, followed by surgery and radiotherapy. After six cycles of VEP, the pathological response rate (pCR) in breast was confirmed in six patients (12%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3-21)) using Chevallier's classification and in nine patients (18%; 95% CI: 7.4-28.6) using Sataloff's classification. The clinical response rate was 42% (95% CI: 28.3-55.7), including 26% complete responses. Breast conservation was achieved in 68% of patients. After a median follow-up of 48 months (range, 34-62 months), 16 relapses were observed. The overall and disease-free survivals at 5 years were 54.1% (95% CI: 40.3-67.9) and 38% (95% CI: 24.1-51.9), respectively. The principal toxicities of VEP were grade 3/4 neutropenia observed in 30% of patients and grade 3 anemia observed in 12% of patients. There was no case of severe cardiac toxicity, thrombocytopenia, or any other serious adverse events. In conclusion, whereas this regimen was relatively well tolerated, it appears inferior to other regimens and its use is not recommended.

Combination regimen of epirubicin, vinorelbine and 5-fluorouracil continuous infusion as first-line chemotherapy in anthracycline-naïve metastatic breast cancer patients

We investigated the activity and toxicity of a combination of vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15; epirubicin 25 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15; and 5-fluorouracil continuous infusion at 200 mg/m2 every day, administered as first-line chemotherapy in anthracycline-naive metastatic breast cancer patients. Fifty-three patients entered the study. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. Objective response was 60% by World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria and 63% by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST). The median time to progression was 12.7 months (17.6 months in responders) and the median survival duration was 32.9 months. The dose-limiting toxicity was leucopenia (grade 3/4 in 36% of patients). Grade 3/4 non-haematological toxicities included mucositis in 11% of patients, skin and cardiac toxicity in 4% and 2%, respectively. The combination of vinorelbine, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil continuous infusion was found to be an active and manageable first-line regimen for metastatic breast cancer patients.

A randomized phase II study of combination, alternating and sequential regimens of doxorubicin and docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

This randomized phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of doxorubicin and docetaxel (DOC) administered either as a combination, an alternating or a sequential regimen in women with metastatic breast cancer. Secondary objectives included overall response, time to progression, survival and safety.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with breast cancer (n=123) were randomized to receive doxorubicin and DOC either in combination (60 mg/m2 of each drug), or by alternated or sequential schedule (100 mg/m2 DOC and 75 mg/m2 doxorubicin) every 3 weeks for a maximum of eight cycles as first chemotherapy for stage IV disease. A second randomization allocated patients from each arm to receive prophylactic oral ciprofloxacin or no therapy to prevent febrile neutropenia.

RESULTS

Patients received a median of eight cycles. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the overall response was 63%, 52% and 61% in the combination, alternating and sequential schedules, respectively. Corresponding rates of complete response were 15%, 14% and 11%. Grade 4 neutropenia was common in all arms (81%) and, together with febrile neutropenia, was significantly more frequent with the combination. Prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin did not reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia or infection. Other frequent non-hematological adverse events included alopecia, nausea, vomiting, stomatitis and asthenia. Congestive heart failure only occurred in the combination arm (10%).

CONCLUSION

All three schedules are feasible and endowed of good therapeutic activity. In view of the more pronounced toxicity and the risk of cardiac events because of the higher exposure to doxorubicin, the combination should be least favored when treating women with metastatic breast cancer. Prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin was ineffective and is not recommended.

Phase II Trial of Vinorelbine Plus Doxorubicin in Relapsed Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Small-cell lung cancer that progresses after initial response may still be sensitive to systemic treatment. This study assessed doxorubicin plus vinorelbine tartrate (Navelbine Injection) in patients who had no prior exposure to these agents. Treatment consisted of vinorelbine at 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and doxorubicin at 50 mg/m2 on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The trial was stopped early because of excessive toxicity. The partial response rate was 26.7%. Toxicities included grade IV neutropenia in 73%, and febrile neutropenia and/or sepsis in 60%. Three patients died from sepsis during cycle 1. Performance status 2 was significantly associated with febrile neutropenia (p = 0.044). Although this regimen had some activity, the toxicity precluded further evaluation.

Combined epirubicin and vinorelbine as first-line therapy in metastatic breast cancer: a pilot study performed by the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group

This pilot study investigated the tolerability and efficacy of increasing doses of epirubicin and vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Acute toxicity was manageable at all dose levels for combinations of epirubicin 60-90 mg/m2 on day 1 and vinorelbine 15-25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 repeated every 3 weeks. Myelotoxicity was the most frequent toxic event, with a significant increase in grade 4 leukopenia from 0% at dose level 1 (60+15 mg/m2) to 26% at dose level 6 (90+25 mg/m2). Signs of acute or chronic cardiotoxicity grades 2-4 were seen in 15% of the patients and included arrhythmia and decreased function. No significant association was established between dose and nonhematological toxicity. Objective responses were observed in 49 of the 99 evaluable patients (49.5%, 95% CI 39.9-59.2), 18 being complete and 31 partial responses. Responses were observed at all six dose levels. In conclusion, acute toxicity was manageable at all dose levels for combinations of epirubicin 60-90 mg/m2 on day 1 and vinorelbine 15-25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8. In the treatment of advanced breast cancer, improvement of the antitumor efficacy by the addition of vinorelbine to epirubicin remains to be demonstrated in a randomized phase III trial.

A phase II study of epirubicin, vinorelbine and cisplatin in advanced breast cancer

Our objective was to evaluate the activity and safety of the combination of cisplatin, epirubicin and vinorelbine (CEV) in advanced breast cancer patients. Patients with advanced breast cancer, locally advanced or metastatic, received epirubicin 75 mg/m2 and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 on day 1, and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on day 8. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. A total of 35 patients were treated. Thirty-one patients were evaluated for response. One hundred and fifty-five cycles of chemotherapy were administered overall. The objective response rate (ORR) was 84%, including complete response in 13% of patients. All stage III patients achieved a downstaging, with a pathological complete response in two out of 10 patients. Patients with stage IV disease obtained objective response in 67% of cases. Toxicity was mild to moderate. The most common grade 3-4 adverse event was febrile neutropenia, which occurred in 17% of patients. We conclude that CEV combination represents an effective treatment for patients with previously untreated advanced breast cancer, allowing an important ORR. Moreover this regimen appears to be well tolerated.

Efficacy of a primary chemotherapy regimen combining vinorelbine, epirubicin, and methotrexate (VEM) as neoadjuvant treatment in 89 patients with operable breast cancer

PURPOSE

In order to improve the breast conservation rate for noninflammatory operable breast cancer stage II and IIIa, neoadjuvant chemotherapy containing vinorelbine, 25 mg/m(2), epirubicin, 35 mg/m(2), and methotrexate, 20 mg/m(2), VEM, was administered days 1 and 8 every 28 days for six cycles.

METHODS

From October, 1991 to April, 1996, 89 patients (median age 52 years, range 31-72; 68 stage II and 19 stage IIIa) received 519 cycles (median six) of VEM chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Hematotoxicity was mild (World Health Organization grade 3-4 neutropenia in 28% of cycles for 22 patients, and anemia or thrombocytopenia >grade 2) when it occurred, and there were no toxic deaths. The clinical objective response was 90% (28% complete response and 62% partial response). All patients underwent surgery: 77 (87%) had conservative and 12 (13%) had modified radical mastectomy, and 12 (14%) reached pathological complete response. At December, 2000, with a median follow-up of 86 months (39-100), 13 patients had relapsed, and five had died of metastatic disease. Median disease-free survival was 100 months (8.4 years) and median survival had not yet been reached.

A phase II study of cisplatin and vinorelbine in patients with metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of cisplatin and vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cisplatin (80 mg/m(2) day 1) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8) were administrated every 3 weeks to 52 patients (mean age 57 years; range 35-75 years) with metastatic breast cancer. Thirty-two patients were previously untreated for metastatic disease. Treatment was repeated for a maximum of six cycles.

RESULTS

Objective responses were obtained in 27 patients (52.9%; complete response 9.8%). The response rate was similar in pretreated and untreated patients (50% and 54.7%, respectively; P = 0.7). ECOG performance status was good (grade 0 or 1) in 55.7% of patients at baseline assessment and in 90.3% at the end of treatment (P = 0.0001). Median time to progression was 8.5 months (8.5 months in first-line and 8.7 months in second-line patients). Median survival was 16.6 months (21.2 months in first-line and 16.1 months in second-line patients). Grade 3/4 toxicity included neutropenia (44% in first-line, 60% in second-line patients), nausea (17.3%), anemia (17%), asthenia (3.8%) and thrombocytopenia (1.9%). There were no cases of febrile neutropenia or treatment-related deaths. Alopecia did not develop in any of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Cisplatin plus vinorelbine is active and tolerable in metastatic breast cancer, in untreated and pretreated patients.

A phase II study of intravenous navelbine and doxorubicin combination in previously untreated advanced breast carcinoma

PURPOSE

The combination of vinorelbine and doxorubicin, two very active drugs in metastatic breast cancer, has demonstrated impressive results in terms of efficacy, at the price of cardiac toxicity (10% grades 2-4) due to the cumulative dose of doxorubicin delivered. This study was designed to divide the dose of doxorubicin into two administrations (day 1 and 8) in order to reduce the toxicity profile, while keeping the same level of efficacy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight chemotherapy-naïve metastatic breast cancer patients entered into the study and were treated with vinorelbine, 25 mg/m(2), and doxorubicin, 25 mg/m(2), both on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks. Thirty-seven patients were evaluable for efficacy and 38 for tolerance; 71% of the patients presented with visceral metastases.

RESULTS

Patients received a median of seven cycles and 94.9% of the intended dose intensity of both drugs. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was reported in 10% of cycles. Alopecia was reported in 89.5% of the patients, and grade 2 nausea/vomiting in 9.3% of the cycles. Grade 1-2 cardiac toxicity was noted in 23.7% of the patients. The objective response rate of the patients was 78.4% (nearly 81% for patients with visceral metastases); the median duration of response was 11.6 months, the median survival 21.6 months, and the 1-year survival 75.2%.

CONCLUSION

This schedule of vinorelbine/doxorubicin represents an active and well-tolerated combination.

First-line treatment with epirubicin and vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

This phase II multicenter trial was aimed at investigating the activity of epirubicin-vinorelbine combination as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ninety-seven patients with metastatic breast cancer and no prior exposure to anthracyclines received the following regimen: epirubicin 100 mg/m(2) by intravenous (IV) bolus infusion on day 1 plus vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) by 30-minute IV infusion on days 1 and 5, every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles. All patients also received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G- CSF) on days 7 to 12 of every cycle.

RESULTS

Objective responses, confirmed at least 4 weeks after the first documentation, were observed in 65 out of 92 assessable patients (70.6%; 95% CI, 62% to 80%). Disease remained stable in 17 patients (18.5%). Responses were observed in all disease sites, being 94% in soft tissue, 60% in bone, and 66% in visceral disease. Median time to response, median duration of response, median time to progression, and median overall survival were 2, 9, 10, and 26 months, respectively. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia, which was grade 4 in 36% of the patients, and was accompanied by fever in 26% of the cases. Grade 3 to 4 mucositis was encountered in 28% of the patients. Other toxicities were mild to moderate. No cardiotoxicity was observed.

CONCLUSION

The epirubicin-vinorelbine combination with G-CSF support has been shown in this study to be highly active as first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer patients, with significant although transient toxicity. This justifies further evaluation in the neoadjuvant setting and in early-stage breast cancer.

Population pharmacokinetics model and limited sampling strategy for intravenous vinorelbine derived from phase I clinical trials

AIMS

a) To characterize the pharmacokinetics of intravenous vinorelbine, b) to use a population analysis for the identification of patient covariates that might appreciably influence its disposition and c) to define a limited sampling strategy for further Bayesian estimation of individual pharmacokinetic parameters.

METHODS

All data were collected from 64 patients (99 courses) entered in three different phase I trials that have been previously reported. All patients received vinorelbine as a 20 min infusion with dose levels ranging from 20-45 mg m-2. The population pharmacokinetic model was built in a sequential manner on a subset of two-thirds of the data, starting with a covariate-free model then progressing to a covariate model using the nonlinear-mixed effect methodology. The remaining one-third of the data were used to validate several sparse sampling designs.

RESULTS

A linear three-compartment model characterized vinorelbine blood concentrations (n=1228). Two primary pharmacokinetic parameters (total clearance and volume of distribution) were related to various combinations of covariates. The relationship for total clearance (CLtotal (l h-1)=29.2xBSAx(1-0.0090 Plt)+6.7xWt/Crs) was dependent on the patient's body surface area (BSA), weight (Wt), serum creatinine (Crs) and platelet count before administration (Plt). The optimal limited sampling strategy consisted of a combination of three measured blood concentrations; the first immediately before the end of infusion or 20 min later, the second at either 1 h, 3 h or 6 h and the third at 24 h after drug administration.

CONCLUSIONS

A population pharmacokinetic model and a limited sampling strategy for intravenous vinorelbine have been developed. This is the first population analysis performed on the basis of a large phase I database that has identified clinical covariates influencing the disposition of i.v. vinorelbine. The model can be used to obtain accurate Bayesian estimates of pharmacokinetic parameters in situations where extensive pharmacokinetic sampling is not feasable.

Developments in cytotoxic chemotherapy: advances in treatment utilising vinorelbine

Vinorelbine is a third generation vinca alkaloid which has been in clinical development for 15 years. Recent exploration of its pre-clinical activity has revealed unexpected evidence of potential synergy with taxane compounds and early clinical results support the suggestion of enhanced efficacy particularly in breast cancer. The initial studies establishing the clinical activity of vinorelbine in breast cancer and non-small cell lung cancer have been extended to encompass a thorough evaluation of its contribution to combination chemotherapy for these disorders. In the treatment of breast cancer useful activity has been established for vinorelbine in combination with anthracyclines, anthracenediones, antimetabolites and the taxanes; additive toxicity is not a limiting factor. The activity of vinorelbine in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer is significantly extended by incorporation into schedules utilising cisplatin and other agents. Vinorelbine has also demonstrated useful activity in the treatment of a wide range of other malignancies including prostatic carcinoma, multiple myeloma, cancer of the ovary, cervix and head and neck and malignant lymphomas.

Vinorelbine, epirubicin, and methotrexate (VEM) as primary treatment in locally advanced breast cancer

PURPOSE

This phase II trial of VEM (vinorelbine + epirubicine + methotrexate) in the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer was conducted to obtain downstaging to allow surgery and breast conservation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicenter study recruited 58 patients with locally advanced breast cancer (two patients ineligible); 56 were evaluable for response and tolerance.

RESULTS

Downstaging was obtained in 77% of the patients with a pathological complete response (pCR) rate of 9%. At 33 months of follow-up, median survival has not been reached. Neutropenia grade 3-4 was reported in 31% of cycles with 3% of cycles with infection grade 3. Alopecia grade 3 was noticed for 71% of patients.

CONCLUSION

VEM represents an effective regimen for patients with locally advanced breast cancer, allowing an important pCR. Moreover, this regimen appears to be particularly well tolerated.

Activity and safety of vinorelbine combined with doxorubicin or fluorouracil as first-line therapy in advanced breast cancer: a stratified phase II study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of vinorelbine combined with doxorubicin or continuous infusion of fluorouracil as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer. AUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 118 women who had not received chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer were enrolled and included in the intent-to-treat analysis. Subjects were stratified into two treatment groups. If subjects were candidates for anthracycline therapy, they received doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2) on day 1 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 (n = 62). If subjects had received adjuvant anthracycline therapy or had cardiac disease, they received fluorouracil 750 mg/m(2)/day by continuous infusion on days 1 through 5 and vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 5 (n = 56). The regimens were repeated every 21 days until evidence of progression of disease or severe toxicity.

RESULTS

For doxorubicin and vinorelbine, the objective response rate was 55% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 42% to 68%), median time to disease progression was 34 weeks, median time to treatment failure was 32 weeks, and median survival was 92 weeks (95% CI: 72 to 128 weeks). For fluorouracil and vinorelbine, the objective response rate was 45% (95% CI: 31% to 59%), median time to disease progression was 32 weeks, median time to treatment failure was 30 weeks, and median survival was 53 weeks (95% CI: 47 to 64 weeks). The most common adverse event was grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia, which occurred in 95% of subjects in the doxorubicin-vinorelbine group and in 88% of those in the fluorouracil-vinorelbine group. The most common nonhematologic adverse event was grade 3 or 4 stomatitis, which occurred in 9% and 32% of subjects in the two groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Both vinorelbine-containing regimens appear to offer useful options as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer. Both regimens were active, and any efficacy differences between the two may have been related to differences in prognosis for the anthracycline-pretreated group (i.e., selection for prior aggressive adjuvant therapy) and or comorbid cardiac conditions. Both regimens were associated with predictable but manageable toxicity, but a lower dose of fluorouracil (e.g., 600 mg/m(2)/day) should be used to reduce the risk of stomatitis.

Chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer: what to expect in 2001 and beyond

Chemotherapy plays an important role in the management of metastatic breast cancer. The anthracyclines (doxorubicin, epirubicin) and the taxanes (paclitaxel, docetaxel) are considered the most active agents for patients with advanced breast cancer. Traditionally, the anthracyclines have been used in combination with cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil (FAC, FEC). The taxanes have single-agent activity similar to older combination chemotherapy treatments. There is great interest in developing anthracycline/taxane combinations. Capecitabine is indicated for patients who progress after anthracycline and taxane therapy. Vinorelbine and gemcitabine have activity in patients with metastatic breast cancer and are commonly used as third- and fourth-line palliative therapy. The role of high-dose chemotherapy is not well-defined and remains experimental. Novel cytotoxic therapy strategies include the development of anthracycline, taxane, and oral fluoropyrimidine analogues; antifolates; topoisomerase I inhibitors, and multidrug resistance inhibitors. A better understanding of the biology of breast cancer is providing novel treatment approaches. Oncogenes and tumor-supressor genes are emerging as important targets for therapy. Trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against the Her-2/neu protein, has been shown to prolong survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Other novel biologic therapies interfere with signal transduction pathways and angiogenesis. The challenge for the next decade will be to integrate these promising agents in the management of metastatic and primary breast cancer.

A review of vinorelbine in the treatment of breast cancer

As combinations and sequences of anthracyclines and taxanes increasingly become standard adjuvant treatment for early breast cancer, a major need for new treatment options for metastatic breast cancer will arise. Vinorelbine is highly active in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, both as a single agent and in combination regimens. Furthermore, it is well tolerated, with a low incidence of subjective toxicities. It is anticipated, therefore, that vinorelbine will become increasingly utilized for treating metastatic breast cancer due to its favorable safety profile, good tolerability, and promising results in combination with other chemotherapy agents. Combinations with trastuzumab and newer molecular targeting agents are being explored. Doublets or triplets of vinorelbine with drugs other than anthracyclines and taxanes could be considered in the next generation of adjuvant and neoadjuvant trials, where it is anticipated that anthracycline/taxane combinations are likely to replace anthracycline/cyclophosphamide combinations as the mainstay of adjuvant treatment.

[Hepatic resection for breast cancer metastases: results and prognosis (65 cases)]

STUDY AIM

To report results of liver resections for breast cancer liver metastasis (BCLM) and to evaluate the rate of survival and the prognostic factors.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Between 1988 and 1999, 69 patients were operated on for BCLM and 65 who had liver resection were analyzed. The selection criteria for surgery were: normal performance status and liver function test; radiological objective response to chemotherapy (and/or hormonotherapy); in cases of non-isolated BCLM, complete response of associated metastatic site (usually bone) and no brain metastases. The mean age of the 65 patients was 47 (30-70) years. BCLM was diagnosed an average of 60 (0-205) months after the initial cancer. The BCLM was more frequently solitary (n = 44). The mean diameter was 3.8 (0-12) cm. The mean number of cycles of chemotherapy before surgery was 7.5 (3-24). Liver resections included major hepatectomy (n = 31): right n = 19, extended left n = 4, left n = 8, minor hepatectomy (n = 25) and limited resection (n = 9).

RESULTS

There was no postoperative mortality. The 18% morbidity rate included a majority of pleural effusions with two reoperations. The median follow-up was 41 months (6-100 months). The survival rate after surgery was 90% at 1 year, 71% at 3 and 46% at 4 years. Thirteen patients are alive at 4 years. The 36-month survival rate differed according to the time to onset of BCLM: 55% before versus 86% after 48 months (p = 0.01). The other studied factors were not statistically associated with survival. The recurrence rate in the remaining liver at 36 months differed according to the lymph node status of the initial breast cancer: 40% for N0-N1 versus 81% for N1b-N2 (p = 0.01) and according to the type of liver resection: 45% for minor liver resection versus 73% for major (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant liver surgery should be included in multicenter treatment protocols for medically-controlled breast cancer liver metastasis.

A phase II trial of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and vinorelbine in the treatment of advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Vinorelbine (Navelbin; N) has proven to be active in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) and cyclophosphamide (C) and epirubicin (Epiadriamycin: E) are still among the main cytostatic agents against this tumor. On this basis was carried out a study to determine the activity and toxicity of the combination of these three agents (CEN).

PATIENTS AND METHOD

From April 1996 to March 1998, 59 patients with ABC were recruited of whom 56 were found eligible and evaluable for toxicity and 55 for activity. The treatment regimen was C: 400 mg/m2, E: 30 mg/m2 and N: 25 mg/m2 administered intravenously on days 1 and 8 of a 28-day cycle.

RESULTS

The median number of cycles administered was 6 (range: 1-16). The most common hematological toxicity was grade (G) 3 and 4 neutropenia occurring in 36% of patients, associated with fever in 7% of them. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia and anemia occurred in 5% and 7%, respectively. Other G2-G3 non hematologic toxicities were: N/vomiting in 34%, alopecia in 73% and mucositis in 11% of patients. An objective response was achieved in 28 of 56 patients (50%) (95% confidence interval (CI): 37-63%): complete response (CR) in 9%, partial response (PR) in 41%. The median duration of response, time to progression and overall survival time was 54, 47 and 90 weeks, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The CEN combination at these doses and treatment schedule appears to have acceptable tolerability but there is no apparent improvement in therapeutic efficacy when compared to other regimens used as first line treatment in ABC.

Gemcitabine and vinorelbine as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer progressing after first-line taxane-based chemotherapy: a phase II study conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group

BACKGROUND

Gemcitabine and vinorelbine have shown activity in breast cancer. A phase II trial was initiated in order to evaluate the response rate (RR) and time to progression (TTP) of the combination of the two drugs in patients with metastatic breast cancer progressing after first-line taxane-based chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-one patients were treated with the combination of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 days 1 + 8 and vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 days 1 + 8. The cycles were repeated every three weeks.

RESULTS

Of 27 evaluable patients 1 (4%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.1%-19%) achieved complete remission (CR), five (18%; 95% CI: 6%-38%) partial remission (PR), eleven (40%; 95% CI: 22%-61%) stable disease and ten patients progressed. The median duration of response was six months (range 4-10+) and the median duration of disease stabilization was five months (range 2-22+). With a median follow-up of 16 months (range 0.4-22+) the median TTP was 3.5 months (range 0.4-22+) and the median survival was 9.5 months (range 0.4-22+). Grade 3-4 toxicities were granulocytopenia 15 patients (48%), rash 3 patients (10%), neuropathy 1 patient (3%) and thrombocytopenia 1 patient (3%). In conclusion the combination of gemcitabine/vinorelbine in the doses administered in this group of patients had a response rate of 22% and needs to be further evaluated in metastatic breast cancer.

Phase III comparative study of vinorelbine combined with doxorubicin versus doxorubicin alone in disseminated metastatic/recurrent breast cancer: National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study MA8

PURPOSE

This phase III study was performed to determine the superiority of doxorubicin (DOX) and vinorelbine (VNB) (arm 1) versus DOX alone (arm 2) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) for overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure (TTF), toxicity, and quality of life (QOL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three hundred three patients were randomized to DOX 50 mg/m(2) intravenously (IV) on day 1 and VNB 25 mg/m(2) IV on days 1 and 8 (arm 1) or DOX 70 mg/m(2) IV on day 1 (arm 2). Both regimens were given every 3 weeks until a cumulative DOX dose of 450 mg/m(2). After 16 of the first 65 randomized patients experienced febrile neutropenia (FN), the doses were reduced to DOX 40 mg/m(2) on day 1 and VNB 20 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 versus DOX 60 mg/m(2) on day 1. Eligible patients were vinca alkaloid and anthracycline naive. Chemotherapy was first-line or second-line for MBC.

RESULTS

Three patients were ineligible. Thus, 300 patients were assessable for toxicity and to determine time to disease progression (TTP), TTF, and OS. Two hundred eighty-nine patients were assessable for response, and 99 responders were assessable for response duration (RD). The response rates, QOL, and median RD, TTP, and TTF were not significantly different between the arms. Median OS was 13.8 months for arm 1 versus 14.4 months for arm 2 (P =.4). Grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia was equivalent in both arms but more grade 3/4 neurotoxicity, mild venous toxicity, and FN were seen on arm 1.

CONCLUSION

The survival with DOX and VNB is not superior to DOX alone in MBC.

Hepatic resection in metastatic breast cancer: results and prognostic factors

AIMS

Breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM) usually indicate the presence of disseminated cancer with a very poor prognosis. However, systemic treatments now allow control of tumour progression in certain cases. We evaluated, in a group of highly selected patients with stabilization or complete response to systemic therapy, a particular management protocol for medically controlled BCLM: <<adjuvant>> liver surgery.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients underwent surgery between May 1988 and September 1997. Results of this strategy are reported, together with analysis of prognostic factors for survival and recurrence in the remaining liver (RRL).

RESULTS

The mean number of cycles of chemotherapy, before surgery, was seven (3-24). Resection was considered to be curative in 86% of cases. The median follow-up was 23 months (1-72 months). The survival after surgery, was 86% at 12 months, 79% at 24 months and 49% at 36 months. The 36-month survival rate differed according to the time to onset of BCLM: 45% before versus 82% after 48 months (P=0.023). The RRL rate at 36 months differed according to the lymph node status of the initial breast cancer: 41% for N0-N1 versus 83% for N1b-N2 (P=0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant liver surgery allowed discontinuation of chemotherapy in 46% of cases and, in this highly selected patient group, allowed good quality prolonged survival. It could be included in multicentre treatment protocols for controlled BCLM, one arm with prolonged chemotherapy, one with adjuvant liver surgery.

First-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer with mitoxantrone, vinorelbine, and carboplatin

A phase II trial was conducted with mitoxantrone (12 mg/m2, day 1), vinorelbine (30 mg/m2, day 1), and carboplatin (250 mg/m2, day 2) every 21 days. Fifty eligible women who had not received prior chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) entered the study. Objective responses were observed in 28 patients (56%; 95% confidence interval: 42.4-69.74%), with 4 complete (8%) and 24 partial responses (48%). Stable disease was observed in 12 patients (24%) and disease progression in 10 (20%). Responses were documented in all involved sites. The median duration of response was 6 months and the median time to tumor progression 8 months. The median survival was 26 months and the estimated 2-year survival was 52%. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 29 patients (58%) with four neutropenic episodes. Grade 3/4 anemia and thrombocytopenia was observed in 7 (14%) and 11 (22%) patients, respectively. Other toxicities included grade 2/3 nausea and vomiting in 26 patients (52%) and grade 1/2 alopecia in 38 (76%). Grade 1/2 neurosensory toxicity occurred in four patients (8%). In conclusion, this three-drug regimen is effective and well tolerated for the treatment of MBC.

Phase I study of Doxil and vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Vinorelbine and Doxil (liposomal doxorubicin) are active chemotherapeutic agents in metastatic breast cancer. A phase I study was designed to evaluate combination therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty women with metastatic breast cancer were enrolled. Dose-limiting toxicity was determined through a dose escalation scheme, and defined for the first treatment cycle, only. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed during the first cycle of treatment.

RESULTS

In the first cohort of Doxil 30 mg/m2 day 1 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 days 1 and 8, patients experienced severe neutropenia. Vinorelbine administration was changed thereafter to days 1 and 15 of each cycle. Dose limiting toxicity was observed at Doxil 50 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2. Doxil 40 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 was defined as the maximally tolerated dose. Few toxicities (principally neutro penia) were seen at this dose level, with the notable absence of significant nausea, vomiting, or alopecia. Though 63% of patients had received prior anthracycline-based chemotherapy, only one patient developed grade 2 cardiac toxicity. Pharmacokinetic studies revealed prolonged exposure to high doxorubicin concentrations for several days following Doxil administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination chemotherapy with Doxil and vinorelbine affords treatment with two active drugs in women with metastatic breast cancer, and appears to have a favorable toxicity profile. A schedule of Doxil 40 mg/m2 day 1 and vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 days 1 and 15 given every 28 days is recommended for phase II studies.

Phase II study of epirubicin and vinorelbine with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: a high-activity, dose-dense weekly regimen for advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to explore the effectiveness and tolerability of a weekly regimen of epirubicin and vinorelbine plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-two patients with previously untreated advanced breast cancer were treated with epirubicin (25 mg/m2/week) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m2/week) with G-CSF support, for 24 consecutive weeks.

RESULTS

The median number of courses per patient was 22 (range 10-24). The administered dose intensity was 23 mg/m2 for both epirubicin and vinorelbine. Ten complete responses (19%) and 30 partial responses (58%) were obtained, for an overall response rate of 77%. None of the patients progressed during treatment. The median response duration and time to progression were both 10 months. A total of 1065 courses were assessed for toxicity. Grade 3 neutropenia was the most common toxic manifestation, (39% of patients), without febrile neutropenia or neutropenic sepsis. Two patients had grade 3 cardiac toxicity, which regressed without sequelae. Median survival was 31 months, with a median follow-up of 24 months (range 9-40).

CONCLUSIONS

Owing to its effectiveness and tolerability, the weekly regimen of epirubicin and vinorelbine plus G-CSF may represent an acceptable alternative for patients with untreated metastatic breast cancer. It could be tested in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting.

Combination cisplatin-vinorelbine for relapsed and chemotherapy-pretreated metastatic breast cancer

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the combination of cisplatin and vinorelbine (PVn) for relapsed and chemotherapy-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Twenty-three patients with metastatic breast cancer and prior chemotherapy were entered in a phase II study between June 1993 and December 1994. Eleven patients were premenopausal and 12 were postmenopausal. Follow-up data up to June 1997 are presented. All patients received cisplatin at a dose of 90 mg/m2 divided over 3 days as 30 mg/m2 infused over 4 hours. Intravenous vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 was given on days 1 and 8 or 15 according to patients' blood counts. Cycles were given every 3 to 4 weeks. An overall response rate of 61% (16/23 patients) was observed. Complete remission was obtained in six patients (26%) and partial remission was obtained in nine patients (35%). The duration of response ranged from 3 to 9 months, with an average of 4 months. Stable disease was noted in 29.1% and progressive disease in 8.3%. Overall survival at 12 months was 50%, and at 36 months it was 8%. Five of 12 patients (42%) who had prior doxorubicin therapy responded well to cisplatin-vinorelbine. Of those 12, seven were refractory and progressive on a doxorubicin-containing regimen, one had complete remission, and four had partial remission. Hematologic toxicity was acceptable. Treatment was delayed because of neutropenia in nine cycles (9.2%) and grade 2 leukopenia occurred in 54% of cycles. Febrile neutropenia occurred in seven cycles (7.1%), and five cycles were complicated by documented sepsis (5.1%). No treatment-related mortality occurred. Thrombocytopenia (grade 3) was seen in 27% of cycles, with no patient having a platelet count below 50,000 or bleeding episodes. Other toxicities were not major or dose-limiting. In conclusion, the combination of cisplatin and vinorelbine produced good responses: 61% response rate (16 of 23 patients) in relapsed, refractory, and heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer, with 50% survival at 1 year, 12% at 2 years, and 8% at 3 years. In addition, a response rate of 42% (5 of 12 patients) was seen in patients resistant to anthracyclines.

Treatment of advanced breast cancer with gemcitabine and vinorelbine plus human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor

PURPOSE

A phase II trial was performed to investigate the efficacy and tolerance of gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in advanced breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between April 96 and August 97, 60 patients entered this trial. Forty-five patients were previously untreated and 15 patients had failed previous palliative chemotherapy with (n = 10) or without anthracyclines (n = 5). Therapy consisted of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 + 15 + 21 and vinorelbine 40 mg/m2 on days 1 + 21, both diluted in 250 ml saline and infused over 30 min. G-CSF was administered at 5 microg/kg/day subcutaneously from days 2-6 and 22-26. Courses were repeated every 5 weeks. Treatment was continued in case of response or stable disease until a total of six courses.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 55.5% for patients who had not received prior palliative chemotherapy (95% confidence interval, 40%-70.3%), including 5 CR (11.1%) and 20 PR (44.4%); 12 patients (27%) had stable disease (SD), and 8 (18%) progressed. Second-line treatment with this regimen resulted in 6/15 (40%) objective remissions, 5 had SD, and 4 PD. The median time to progression was 9.5 months (range, 1.5-28) in previously untreated patients, and 7.0 months (range, 2-23) in those who had failed prior chemotherapy. After a median follow-up time of 15 months, 44 patients (73%) are still alive with metastatic disease. Myelosuppression was commonly observed, though WHO 3 and 4 neutropenia occured in only 9 (15%) and 2 patients (3%), and was never complicated by septicaemia; grade 3 anemia was noted in 2 patients. Severe (WHO grade 3) nonhematologic toxicity was rarely observed, and included nausea/emesis in 3 and constipation in 2 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that gemcitabine and vinorelbine plus G-CSF is an effective and tolerable first- as well as second-line combination regimen for treatment of advanced breast cancer.

Effective treatment of advanced breast cancer with vinorelbine, 5-fluorouracil and l-leucovorin plus human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor

A phase II trial was performed to investigate the efficacy and tolerance of vinorelbine (VNB), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), l-leucovorin (LLV) and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in advanced breast cancer. Between August 1994 and October 1996, 53 patients entered this trial. Thirty-seven patients were previously untreated and 16 patients had failed previous palliative chemotherapy with (n = 12) or without anthracyclines (n = 4). Therapy consisted of VNB 40 mg m(-2) diluted in 250 ml of saline infused over 30 min on days 1 and 14 and LLV 100 mg m(-2) administered by intravenous bolus injection and 5-FU 400 mg m(-2) diluted in 500 ml of saline infused over 2 h, both given on days 1-5 every 4 weeks. G-CSF was administered at 5 microg kg(-1) day(-1) subcutaneously on days 6-10 during each cycle. Treatment was continued in cases of response or stable disease until a total of six courses were completed. The overall response rate was 59% for chemotherapeutically naive patients (95% confidence interval 42-75%), including five complete responses (CR; 13%) and 17 partial responses (PR; 46%); ten patients (27%) had stable disease (SD) and only five (14%) progressed (PD). Second-line chemotherapy with this regimen resulted in 3/16 (19%) objective remissions, but nine patients had SD and four had PD. The median time to progression was 10.5 months (range 2-23) in previously untreated patients and 7.0 months (range 2-19) in those who had failed prior chemotherapy. After a median follow-up time of 14 months, 29 patients (55%) are still alive with metastatic disease; median survival has not been reached yet. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression: WHO grade III and IV neutropenia occurred in 15 (28%) and four patients (8%), and was complicated by septicaemia in two; grade III anaemia and thrombocytopenia were noted in four (8%) and three (6%) patients respectively. Severe (WHO grade 3) non-haematological toxicities included stomatitis in 6% and nausea/vomiting and alopecia in 2% each. Our data suggest that the combination of vinorelbine, 5-fluorouracil and l-leucovorin plus G-CSF is an effective first line regimen for treatment of advanced breast cancer. Overall toxicity was modest, with myelosuppression being the dose-limiting side-effect. Other severe adverse reactions were uncommon.

A dose finding study for the combination of epidoxorubicin and vinorelbine, delivered every two weeks with G-CSF support, in advanced breast cancer

The aim of this study was to find the maximum tolerated dose of epidoxorubicin as part of a regimen with vinorelbine at the dose of 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 5, every 2 weeks in patients with advanced breast cancer. The optimal dose intensity of the two drugs was supported by administration of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) on days 7-12. Patients were treated with epidoxorubicin at three different dose levels (50-65-80 mg/m2 on day 1 of each cycle). No dose limiting toxicity was observed in the first three patients (treated at the dose of 50 mg/m2). We observed one case of dose limiting toxicity out of the 6 patients treated with 65 mg/m2 and 3/3 cases among patients treated with 80 mg/m2. We conclude that 65 mg/m2 is the maximum tolerated dose of epidoxorubicin in this regimen, which is also able to maintain adequate dose intensities.