Systemic therapy in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer:American Society of Clinical Oncology and Cancer Care Ontario clinical practice guideline

Instrumental activities of daily living in older patients with metastatic prostate cancer: results from the meet-URO network ADHERE prospective study

Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) are significant health indicators closely related to executive functions and able to detect mild cognitive impairment. A decline in IADL usually precedes ADL limitation, including taking medications, and may therefore predict a cognitive decline. We aimed to investigate the association of patients' IADL score with other clinical factors, with a particular focus on the presence of a caregiver, and the impact on adherence to androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) and survival outcomes within the Meet-URO 5-ADHERE study. It was a large prospective multicentre observational cohort study monitoring adherence to ARPIs in 234 metastatic castrate-resistant PC (mCRPC) patients aged ≥ 70. We observed an association between impaired IADL and lower geriatric G8 scores (p < 0.01), and lower adherence to ARPIs whether assessed by pill counting (p = 0.01) or self-reported by the patient himself (p = 0.03). The combination of an IADL < 6 and the absence of a caregiver resulted in a significantly high risk of non-adherence to the ARPIs at the multivariable analysis (HR 9.23, 95% confidence interval 2.28-37.43, p = 0.01). IADL alongside the geriatric G8 scales represent essential tools to identify frail and less auto-sufficient patients who are extremely vulnerable particularly if not supported by a caregiver and have the highest risk of nonadherence to ARPIs.

177Lu-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer and Prior 223Ra (RALU Study)

223Ra-dichloride (223Ra) and 177Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) are approved treatments for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The safety and effectiveness of sequential use of 223Ra and 177Lu-PSMA in patients with mCRPC are not well described. This study aimed to evaluate 177Lu-PSMA safety and efficacy in patients with mCRPC previously treated with 223Ra. Methods: The radium→lutetium (RALU) study was a multicenter, retrospective, medical chart review. Participants had received at least 1 223Ra dose and, in any subsequent therapy line, at least 1 177Lu-PSMA dose. Primary endpoints included the incidence of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, grade 3-4 hematologic AEs, and abnormal laboratory values. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, time to next treatment/death, and change from baseline in serum prostate-specific antigen and alkaline phosphatase levels. Results: Data were from 133 patients. Before 177Lu-PSMA therapy, 56% (75/133) of patients received at least 4 life-prolonging therapies; all patients received 223Ra (73% received 5-6 injections). Overall, 27% (36/133) of patients received at least 5 177Lu-PSMA infusions. Any-grade treatment-emergent AEs were reported in 79% (105/133) of patients and serious AEs in 30% (40/133). The most frequent grade 3-4 laboratory abnormalities were anemia (30%, 40/133) and thrombocytopenia (13%, 17/133). Median overall survival was 13.2 mo (95% CI, 10.5-15.6 mo) from the start of 177Lu-PSMA. Conclusion: In this real-world setting, 223Ra followed by 177Lu-PSMA therapy in heavily pretreated patients with mCRPC was clinically feasible, with no indication of impairment of 177Lu-PSMA safety or effectiveness.

Systemic Therapy Update on 177Lutetium-PSMA-617 for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: ASCO Guideline Rapid Recommendation Update

ASCO Rapid Recommendation Updates highlight revisions to select ASCO guideline recommendations as a response to the emergence of new and practice-changing data. The rapid updates are supported by an evidence review and follow the guideline development processes outlined in the ASCO Guideline Methodology Manual. The goal of these articles is to disseminate updated recommendations, in a timely manner, to better inform health practitioners and the public on the best available cancer care options. Guidelines and updates are not intended to substitute for independent professional judgment of the treating provider and do not account for individual variation among patients. See appendix for disclaimers and other important information (Appendix 1 and Appendix 2, online only).

Relative search popularity of five advanced prostate cancer medications using Google Trends

BACKGROUND

There are many FDA-approved drugs for advanced prostate cancer (PC), yet public interest in these drugs is not well understood. We compared public interest and state-level predictors of interest in five common oral adjunctive hormonal therapies.

METHODS

Google Trends™ was queried for: "Enzalutamide", "Abiraterone Acetate", "Bicalutamide", "Apalutamide", and "Darolutamide" in the United States from January 2004 to November 2022. Data are presented as relative search index (RSI) by month. RSI ranges from 0 to 100 with 100 being peak popularity, 50 being half of the peak popularity, and 0 representing insufficient data to be determined.

RESULTS

Several drugs abruptly increased in popularity following FDA approval including abiraterone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide. All drugs decreased in popularity from January 2020 to July 2020, corresponding with the COVID-19 pandemic. In the most recent 5 years, enzalutamide and abiraterone were the most common searched drugs, with bicalutamide a close 3rd place. States that did not expand Medicaid were significantly more likely to have bicalutamide as the top search drug vs. states that expanded Medicaid (p = 0.012). Across all states with data (n = 39), higher bicalutamide RSIs were significantly associated with lower household income (r = 0.385, p = 0.02) and greater percent of uninsured adults (r = 0.426, p = 0.007). This is the first study using Google Trends to compare advanced PC drugs by search popularity.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the emergence of more effective medications, bicalutamide remains relatively popular, particularly in states with lower household income, more uninsured adults, or those that did not expand Medicaid, possibly due to its lower cost.

Adaptive Immunity in Genitourinary Cancers

CONTEXT

While urothelial and renal cell cancers have exhibited modest responses to novel immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the programmed death ligand 1 and its receptor, response rates in patients with prostate cancer have remained poor. The factors underlying suboptimal outcomes observed in patients treated with novel immunotherapies are still to be resolved.

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature and describe the key adaptive immune physiological events associated with cancer progression and therapeutic response in genitourinary (GU) cancers.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We performed a nonsystematic, collaborative narrative review to highlight recent advancements leading to the current state of knowledge on the critical mediators of antitumor adaptive immunity to GU cancers. Further, we discuss the findings on the pre- and post-treatment immunological events that either are unique to each of the three cancer types or exhibit overlapping clinical associations.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Aging-associated immune function decline is a major factor underlying poor outcomes observed in patients treated with both conventional and novel immunotherapies. Other cancer immunobiological aspects associated with suboptimal responses in GU cancers include the overall tumor mutational burden, mutations in specific tumor suppressor/DNA damage repair genes (KDM6A, PTEN, STAG2, TP53, ATM, and BRCA2), and abundance of multiple functional states of adaptive immune cells and their spatiotemporal localization within the tumor immune microenvironment. Understanding these mechanisms may potentially lead to the development of prognostic and predictive biomarkers such as immune cell infiltration profiles and tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) that associate with variable clinical outcomes depending on the nature of the novel immunotherapeutic approach. Implementation of newer immune-monitoring technologies and improved preclinical modeling systems will augment our understanding of the host and tumor intrinsic factors contributing to the variability of responses to immunotherapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the tremendous progress made in the understanding of dynamic and static adaptive immune elements within the tumor immune landscape, several knowledge gaps remain. A comprehensive knowledge thus gained will lead to precision immunotherapy, improved drug sequencing, and a therapeutic response.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We performed a collaborative review by a diverse group of experts in the field to examine our understanding of the events and crosstalk between cancer cells and the patient's immune system that are associated with responses to novel immunotherapies. An evolving understanding of tumor-intrinsic and host-related immune alterations, both before and after therapy, will aid in the discovery of promising markers of responses to immunotherapy as well as the development of unique therapeutic approaches for the management of genitourinary cancers.

"Non-metastatic, Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Diagnostic and Treatment Recommendations by an Expert Panel from Brazil"

INTRODUCTION

Non-metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) is an important clinical stage of prostate cancer, prior to morbidity and mortality from clinical metastases. In particular, the introduction of novel androgen-receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSi) has changed the therapeutic landscape in nmCRPC. Given recent developments in this field, we update our recommendations for the management of nmCRPC.

METHODS

A panel of 51 invited medical oncologists and urologists convened in May of 2021 with the aim of discussing and providing recommendations regarding the most relevant issues concerning staging methods, antineoplastic therapy, osteoclast-targeted therapy, and patient follow-up in nmCRPC. Panel members considered the available evidence and their practical experience to address the 73 multiple-choice questions presented.

RESULTS

Key recommendations and findings include the reliance on prostate-specific antigen doubling time for treatment decisions, the absence of a clear preference between conventional and novel (i.e., positron-emission tomography-based) imaging techniques, the increasing role of ARSis in various settings, the general view that ARSis have similar efficacy. Panelists highlighted the slight preference for darolutamide, when safety is of greater concern, and a continued need to develop high-level evidence to guide the intensity of follow-up in this subset of prostate cancer.

DISCUSSION

Despite the limitations associated with a consensus panel, the topics addressed are relevant in current practice, and the recommendations can help practicing clinicians to provide state-of-the-art treatment to patients with nmCRPC in Brazil and other countries with similar healthcare settings.

177Lu-PSMA-617 RLT in mCRPC: A single center experience, the earlier could be the better

INTRODUCTION

Radioligand therapy which targets the prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has recently considered as option in the treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the biochemical, clinical and radiological data of patients received treatment with ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-617 RLT in our clinic following the diagnosis of mCRPC, and to investigate the relationship between treatment timing and metastasis region and survival.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a retrospective, observational, single-center study from December 2016 to December 2019. Patients underwent ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-617 RLT with a diagnosis of mCRPC. We used the Kaplan-Meier test and the Cox regression proportional hazard test to assess survival data.

RESULTS

95 patients with an average age of 70.45 (50-85) were evaluated retrospectively. Median follow-up was 10.86 months (8.15-11.94 months) and the median lines of ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-617 RLT treatment was 4 (1-5). Median overall survival was found to be 17.03 ± 5,78 months in the patients receiving the treatment at the third or lower lines while it was 10,30 ± 0,93 months in patients receiving the treatment at the fourth or higher lines (p = 0.021). When evaluating patients with only bone metastasis and patients with bone and lymph node metastasis, the median overall survival was 11.46 ± 0.87 months and 12.13 ± 3.02 months (p = 0.445), respectively.

CONCLUSION

¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-617 RLT treatment provides better survival in the treatment of patients diagnosed with mCRPC after standard treatments and received it earlier. ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-617 RLT treatment could be an effective treatment method in mCRPC patients with bone and lymph node metastasis.

Understanding what matters to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients when considering treatment options: A US patient preference survey

BACKGROUND

Understanding how patients perceive the efficacy, safety, and administrative burden of treatments for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) can facilitate shared-decision making for optimal management. This study sought to elicit patient preferences for mCRPC treatments in the US.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional survey using the discrete-choice experiment method. Participants were asked to state their choices over successive sets of treatment alternatives, defined by varying levels of treatment attributes: overall survival (OS), months until patients develop a fracture or bone metastasis, likelihood of requiring radiation to control bone pain, fatigue, nausea, and administration (i.e., oral/IV injection/IV infusion). Using mixed logit models, we determined the value (i.e., preference weights) that respondents placed on each attribute. Relative attribute importance (RAI) and marginal rates of substitution (MRS) were calculated to understand patients' willingness to make tradeoffs among different attributes.

RESULTS

The final data set numbered 160 participants, with a mean age of 71.6 years old and a mean of 8.96 years since prostate cancer diagnosis. Participants' treatment preferences were as follows: OS (RAI: 31%), bone pain control (23%), nausea (16%), delaying fracture or bone metastasis (15%), fatigue (11%), and administration (3%). The MRS demonstrated that respondents were willing to trade 1.9 months of OS to eliminate moderate nausea and 3.3 months of OS for a reduction in fatigue from severe to mild.

CONCLUSIONS

Improving OS is the highest priority for patients with mCRPC, but they are willing to trade some survival to reduce the risk of requiring radiation to control bone pain, delay a fracture or bone metastasis, and experience less severe nausea and fatigue.

Real-world effectiveness, long-term safety and treatment pathway integration of radium-223 therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Radium-223 dichloride (²²³Ra) is an α-emitter approved for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with bone metastases, but without visceral involvement. Despite being a life-prolonging therapy (LPT), ²²³Ra remains underutilized. A large body of real-world evidence (RWE) for ²²³Ra has been published in the decade since the pivotal phase 3 ALSYMPCA study, a period during which the treatment landscape has continued to evolve. How to optimize ²²³Ra use, including how to integrate it into the mCRPC management pathway amongst other current LPTs (i.e., with respect to timing and concurrent, layered, or sequential use), is therefore of considerable interest. RWE studies lack the conventional restraints of clinical trials and can therefore help to build an understanding of how treatments may be best used in routine practice. Here we review RWE studies investigating the efficacy and safety of ²²³Ra in mCRPC [including in sequence with the recently approved 177-Lutetium conjugated to the ligand prostate-specific membrane antigen (¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA)], as well as response marker development, imaging techniques, and current clinical practice recommendations.

Integrated analysis to identify the AC005154.6/hsa-miR-29c-3p/CCNL2 axis as a novel prognostic biomarker associated with immune infiltration in prostate cancer

Background

Prostate cancer (PCa) is currently the major malignancy in men. It is becoming increasingly clear that competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) regulation networks are important in a wide variety of cancers. Nevertheless, there is still much to learn about the biological functions of the ceRNA network in prostate cancer.

Methods

The ceRNA network was constructed using the "GDCRNATools" package. Based on survival analysis, we obtained AC005154.6/hsa-miR-29c-3p/CCNL2 for further analysis. The prognostic model based on this ceRNA network was constructed by univariate and multivariate Cox regression methods. Furthermore, functional enrichment analysis, mutation landscape analysis, immune infiltration analysis, drug sensitivity analysis, methylation analysis, pan-cancer analysis, and molecular experiments of CCNL2 were carried out to investigate the role of CCNL2 in tumorigenesis.

Results

We identified the AC005154.6/CCNL2 axis as a risk factor that can promote the progression of prostate cancer by bioinformatics analysis and molecular experiments. Immune infiltration analysis suggested that CCNL2 may act as a novel biomarker for treatment decisions. The methylation level of CCNL2 was significantly decreased in tumor samples, possibly contributing to the upregulation of CCNL2 in prostate cancer. Moreover, CCNL2 is differentially expressed in multiple cancers and is tightly correlated with immune infiltration.

Conclusion

The current study constructed a ceRNA network, AC005154.6/hsa-miR-29c-3p/CCNL2. Potentially, this biomarker can be used for early diagnosis and decision-making about prostate cancer treatment.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12935-022-02779-5.

Real-world Treatment Sequencing in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Results from the Prospective, International, Observational Prostate Cancer Registry

Background

Prostate cancer has a multifaceted treatment pattern. Evidence is lacking for optimal treatment sequences for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

Objective

To increase the understanding of real-world treatment pathways and outcomes in patients with mCRPC.

Design, setting, and participants

A prospective, noninterventional, real-world analysis of 3003 patients with mCRPC in the Prostate Cancer Registry (PCR; NCT02236637) from June 14, 2013 to July 9, 2018 was conducted.

Intervention

Patients received first- and second-line hormonal treatment and chemotherapy as follows: abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (abiraterone)-docetaxel (ABI-DOCE), abiraterone-enzalutamide (ABI-ENZA), abiraterone–radium-223 (ABI-RAD), docetaxel-abiraterone (DOCE-ABI), docetaxel-cabazitaxel (DOCE-CABA), docetaxel-enzalutamide (DOCE-ENZA), and enzalutamide-docetaxel (ENZA-DOCE).

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

Baseline patient characteristics, quality of life, mCRPC treatments, and efficacy outcomes (progression and survival) were presented descriptively.

Results and limitations

Data from 727 patients were eligible for the analysis (ABI-DOCE n = 178, ABI-ENZA n = 99, ABI-RAD n = 27, DOCE-ABI n = 191, DOCE-CABA n = 74, DOCE-ENZA n = 116, and ENZA-DOCE n = 42). Demographics and disease characteristics among patients between different sequences varied greatly. Most patients who started on abiraterone or enzalutamide stopped therapy because of disease progression. No randomisation to allow treatment/sequence comparisons limited this observational study.

Conclusions

The real-world PCR data complement clinical trial data, reflecting more highly selected patient populations than seen in routine clinical practice. Baseline characteristics play a role in mCRPC first-line treatment selection, but other factors, such as treatment availability, have an impact. Efficacy observations are limited and should be interpreted with caution.

Patient summary

Baseline characteristics appear to have a role in the first-line treatment selection of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in the real-world setting. First-line abiraterone acetate plus prednisone seems to be the preferred treatment option for older patients and those with lower Gleason scores, first-line docetaxel for younger patients and those with more advanced disease, and first-line enzalutamide for patients with fewer metastases and more favourable performance status. The benefit to patients from these observations remains unknown.

Integration of Liquid Biopsies in Clinical Management of Metastatic Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The field of liquid biopsies is constantly evolving through novel technologies. This review outlines current data on liquid biopsies and application to clinical management of metastatic prostate cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

To date, there are three platforms with FDA approval for use in the setting of metastatic prostate cancer and others which have been clinically validated. There is substantial evidence supporting the use of circulating tumor cell (CTC) enumeration to guide prognosis in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Additional evidence supports targeted sequencing of CTC and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) to guide androgren-directed therapy, identify candidates for treatment with PARP inhibitors, and monitor development of resistance. As a real-time and minimally invasive approach, utilization of liquid biopsies has the potential to drastically impact the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer and improve overall survival. With further clinical validation, additional liquid biopsy is likely to enter standard clinical practice.

Impact of treatment on elder-relevant physical function and quality of life outcomes in older adults with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

Understanding physical function (PF) and quality of life (QoL) treatment effects are important in treatment decision-making for older adults with cancer. However, data are limited for older men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We evaluated the effects of treatment on PF and QoL in older men with mCRPC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Men aged 65+ with mCRPC were enrolled in this multicenter prospective observational study. PF measures included instrumental activities of daily living, grip strength, chair stands, and gait speed. QoL measures included fatigue, pain, mood, and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-General total and sub-scale scores. Outcomes were collected at baseline, three, and six months. Linear mixed effects regression models were used to examine PF and QoL differences over time across various treatment cohorts.

RESULTS

We enrolled 198 men starting chemotherapy (n = 71), abiraterone (n = 37), enzalutamide (n = 67), or radium-223 (n = 23). At baseline, men starting chemotherapy had worse measures of PF, QoL, pain, and mood than the other groups. Over time, all PF measures remained stable, pain improved, but functional wellbeing (FWB) and mood worsened significantly for all cohorts. However, change over time in all outcomes was not appreciably different between treatment cohorts. Worst-case sensitivity analyses identified attrition (ranging from 22 to 42% by six months) as a major limitation of our study, particularly for the radium-223 cohort.

DISCUSSION

FWB and mood were most prone to deterioration over time, whereas pain improved with treatment. Although patients initiating chemotherapy had worse baseline PF and QoL, chemotherapy was not associated with significantly greater worsening over time compared to other common therapies for mCRPC. These findings may assist in treatment discussions with patients. However, given the modest sample size, attrition, and timeframe of follow-up, the impact of treatment on PF and QoL outcomes in this setting requires further study, particularly for radium-223.

Systemic Therapy Update on 177Lutetium-PSMA-617 for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: ASCO Rapid Recommendation

ASCO Rapid Recommendations Updates highlight revisions to select ASCO guideline recommendations as a response to the emergence of new and practice-changing data. The rapid updates are supported by an evidence review and follow the guideline development processes outlined in the ASCO Guideline Methodology Manual. The goal of these articles is to disseminate updated recommendations, in a timely manner, to better inform health practitioners and the public on the best available cancer care options.

Factors Influencing Outcome Post–Radium-223 Dichloride in Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Review of Some Real-World Challenges

Aim Radium-223 has been the first-approved targeted Alpha therapy agent. We retrospectively assessed different factors influencing the overall survival (OS) and patient management.

Setting and Design Thirty-two metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients' hematological parameters, number of cycles, performance status, and toxicities were evaluated for OS. Radium 223 dichloride (Radium-223) was administered every 4 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. Primary and secondary end points were OS, progression free survival (PFS), therapy toxicities, change in performance status, biochemical response, and skeletal-related events (SREs).

Materials and Methods Patients' median age was 77 years (range: 57–90 years) and median follow-up was 399 days (range: 5–1,761 days). A total of 163 cycles were administered in 32 patients, with 4 or less cycles in 8 patients (25%) and 5 or more cycles in 24 patients (75%). Among eight patients with 4 or less cycles, three patients died, of which two patients died due to neutropenic sepsis.

Statistical Analysis Mann–Whitney test was used to compare the cycle groups; Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to see the relation of different variables with OS. Log rank test was used for group comparison while Kaplan–Meier survivorship was used for OS.

Results Statistical correlation was seen between the number of cycles (p=0.037) and hemoglobin (p=0.028). Kaplan–Meier OS (p=0.038) was correlated with the number of cycles (≤ 4 cycles and ≥ 5 cycles). OS was 173 days in patients with one to four cycles, 226 days in five cycles, and 493 days in six cycles. Myelosuppression leading to stopping of full six cycles was seen in 7 of 32 patients (22%) and significantly correlated to inferior OS (p=0.048).

Conclusion Higher number of Radium-223 cycles was seen to be associated with better OS. Prior myelosuppression was associated with poor OS. Patients with better hematological profile were more likely to complete the maximum number of the cycles with a better OS.

hsa_circ_0092339 acts as a molecular sponge in castration-resistant prostate cancer via the hsa-mir-940/C-MYC axis

Aims: We aimed to determine whether intronic circRNA acts as a molecular sponge in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Materials & methods: A gene chip technique was used to conduct sequencing. A qPCR experiment was performed to verify the result. Radioimmunoprecipitation, RNA pull-down and dual-luciferase reporter assays were performed to particularly expound its function. Verification of downstream effects was carried out through qPCR and western blot, and a xenograft assay was performed in vivo for verification. Results: Intronic circRNA hsa_circ_0092339 in the nucleus was highly expressed in CRPC cell lines. hsa_circ_0092339 did not regulate the expression of its parental gene. hsa_circ_0092339 functions like a molecular sponge, preventing degradation of C-MYC mRNA by absorbing hsa-mir-940. Conclusion: hsa_circ_0092339 plays a critical role in CRPC through targeting C-MYC indirectly by absorbing hsa-mir-940.

The Cancer Financial Experience (CAFÉ) study: randomized controlled trial of a financial navigation intervention to address cancer-related financial hardship

BACKGROUND

There is an urgent need for evidence on how interventions can prevent or mitigate cancer-related financial hardship. Our objectives are to compare self-reported financial hardship, quality of life, and health services use between patients receiving a financial navigation intervention versus a comparison group at 12 months follow-up, and to assess patient-level factors associated with dose received of a financial navigation intervention.

METHODS

The Cancer Financial Experience (CAFÉ) study is a multi-site randomized controlled trial (RCT) with individual-level randomization. Participants will be offered either brief (one financial navigation cycle, Arm 2) or extended (three financial navigation cycles, Arm 3) financial navigation. The intervention period for both Arms 2 and 3 is 6 months. The comparison group (Arm 1) will receive enhanced usual care. The setting for the CAFÉ study is the medical oncology and radiation oncology clinics at two integrated health systems in the Pacific Northwest. Inclusion criteria includes age 18 or older with a recent cancer diagnosis and visit to a study clinic as identified through administrative data. Outcomes will be assessed at 12-month follow-up. Primary outcomes are self-reported financial distress and health-related quality of life. Secondary outcomes are delayed or foregone care; receipt of medical financial assistance; and account delinquency. A mixed methods exploratory analysis will investigate factors associated with total intervention dose received.

DISCUSSION

The CAFÉ study will provide much-needed early trial evidence on the impact of financial navigation in reducing cancer-related financial hardship. It is theory-informed, clinic-based, aligned with patient preferences, and has been developed following preliminary qualitative studies and stakeholder input. By design, it will provide prospective evidence on the potential benefits of financial navigation on patient-relevant cancer outcomes. The CAFÉ trial's strengths include its broad inclusion criteria, its equity-focused sampling plan, its novel intervention developed in partnership with clinical and operations stakeholders, and mixed methods secondary analyses related to intervention dose offered and dose received. The resulting analytic dataset will allow for rich mixed methods analysis and provide critical information related to implementation of the intervention should it prove effective.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05018000 . August 23, 2021.

Application of Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy to Guide Therapy for Advanced Prostate Cancer Patients

A critical unmet need for advanced prostate cancer (PCa) patients is optimizing systemic treatments to maximize the benefit for individuals. The response of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) to androgen receptor (AR)-directed hormonal treatments (i.e., enzalutamide and abiraterone) is mediated by the expression of a molecular variant of the androgen receptor called androgen receptor variant 7 (AR-V7). Detection and measurement of AR-V7 in mCRPC patients will lead to more informed PCa treatment. Herein, we demonstrate a quantitative nanoparticle-enhanced sandwich antibody assay for the successful ex vivo measurement of AR-V7 protein in serum from mCRPC patients. The nanoparticles are constructed as extrinsic Raman spectroscopy labels (ERLs), and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) is used for assay readout. Our approach does not require specialized specimen collection materials, circulating tumor cell enrichment, or pretreatment of serum. Calibration of our assay is accomplished by expressing AR-V7 in an appropriate cell line as AR-V7 is not commercially available. We demonstrate a linear calibration curve from cell lysate and correlate lysate protein with mRNA from cultured prostate cancer cells. Finally, we demonstrate a novel pilot-scale application for clinical use by quantitatively measuring AR-V7 in serum of seven advanced PCa patients. Distinct separation of PCa patients by AR-V7 status (positive or negative) was observed. Together, the presence and amount of AR-V7 in serum offer predictive and prognostic value to inform selection between two classes of systemic treatments (i.e., hormones or taxanes). Triaging patients that are AR-V7-positive to other systemic treatments (e.g., taxane-based chemotherapy) can improve progression-free survival and overall survival.

Bioinformatics Prediction and Analysis of MicroRNAs and Their Targets as Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer: A Preliminary Study

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common form of cancer in men around the world. Due to its heterogeneity, presentations range from aggressive lethal disease to indolent disease. There is a need to identify core biomarkers that are important for early detection and progression, allowing a more precise method for the treatment and management of Pca. We obtained metastatic prostate cancer associated microRNA array profiles from the GSE28029 dataset in the GEO database. MicroRNA target prediction was done using the databases, TargetScanHuman, miRDB and DIANA microT, six target genes (FOXC1, CDKN1A, BIRC2, CTNND1, ELK1 and LRP8) were found to be common among the three different databases. Differential expression of the target genes was performed via the GENT2 database in the GPL96 platform (HG-U133A). Results indicated all genes were downregulated. Gene Ontology (GO) was used to perform enrichment analysis. The GO enrichment analysis indicated that the downregulated genes were enriched in cellular response to gamma radiation, regulation of transcription and response to drugs as well as protein binding and receptor signaling protein activity. The study suggested that CDKN1A, FOXC1 and BIRC2 might be core genes for prostate cancer that play an important role in its diagnosis, development and progression.

MicroRNA-regulated transcriptome analysis identifies four major subtypes with prognostic and therapeutic implications in prostate cancer

MicroRNA (miRNA) deregulation plays a critical role in the heterogeneous development of prostate cancer (PCa) by tuning mRNA levels. Herein, we aimed to characterize the molecular features of PCa by clustering the miRNA-regulated transcriptome with non-negative matrix factorization. Using 478 PCa samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas, four molecular subtypes (S-I, S-II, S-III, and S-IV) were identified and validated in two merged microarray and RNAseq datasets with 656 and 252 samples, respectively. Interestingly, the four subtypes showed distinct clinical and biological features after comprehensive analyses of clinical features, multiomic profiles, immune infiltration, and drug sensitivity. S-I is basal/stem/mesenchymal-like and immune-excluded with marked transforming growth factor β, epithelial-mesenchymal transition and hypoxia signals, increased sensitivity to olaparib, and intermediate prognosis. S-II is luminal/metabolism-active and responsive to androgen deprivation therapy with frequent TMPRSS2-ERG fusion and a good prognosis. S-III is characterized by moderate proliferative and metabolic activity, sensitivity to taxane-based chemotherapy, and intermediate prognosis. S-IV is highly proliferative with moderate EMT and stemness, frequent deletions of TP53, PTEN and RB, and the poorest prognosis; it is also immune-inflamed and sensitive to anti-PD-L1 therapy. Overall, based on miRNA-regulated gene profiles, this study identified four distinct PCa subtypes that could improve risk stratification at diagnosis and provide therapeutic guidance.

Clinical outcomes, management, and treatment patterns in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with radium-223 in community compared to academic settings

BACKGROUND

The most common site of disease in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is the bone. The ALSYMPCA study demonstrated that radium-223 significantly improved overall survival (OS) in mCRPC patients with symptomatic bone metastases and without visceral metastases. However, administration requires a multidisciplinary approach and an infrastructure that supports coordination of care, which may differ by practice site. We aimed to evaluate practice patterns and treatment outcomes in patients with mCRPC treated at a community practice (CP) compared with those treated at an academic center (AC).

METHODS

This retrospective review included 200 adult mCRPC patients receiving radium-223 between January 2014 and June 2017. The primary endpoint, OS, was estimated from the date of radium-223 initiation. Secondary outcomes included a comparison of baseline characteristics, reasons for initiation and discontinuation of radium-223, and treatment sequencing. A subset analysis of OS based on the number of radium-223 doses and on sequencing of radium-223 either before or after chemotherapy was also conducted.

RESULTS

Most patients were treated at a CP (57%). Patients treated at CP sites were significantly older (74.9 vs. 71.9 years; p = .031) and had more comorbidities (Klabunde score 1.1 vs. 0.7; p = .020) than those in an AC but initiated treatment within a shorter period of time from diagnosis of mCRPC (1.3 vs. 1.9 years; p < .001) and received a greater mean number of radium-223 doses (5.4 vs. 4.8; p = .001). There were no observed differences in OS between CPs versus ACs (21.6 vs. 20.7 months; p = .306). Overall, patients who received 5-6 doses versus 1-4 doses of radium-223 had a longer median OS (23.3 vs. 6.4 months; p < .001). The most common reason for discontinuation in patients who did not complete treatment was disease progression. Overall, 43% of patients received radium-223 monotherapy and 57% concurrently with other agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients received radium-223 concurrently with abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide and were able to complete 5-6 doses of radium-223. Despite differences in the populations and treatment patterns, no survival differences between patients treated in ACs versus CPs were observed. Additional real-world data are needed to validate these findings.

Global experience with PSMA-based alpha therapy in prostate cancer

Purpose

This review discusses the current state of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based alpha therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). With this in-depth discussion on the growing field of PSMA-based alpha therapy (PAT), we aimed to increase the interactions between basic scientists and physician–scientists in order to advance the field.

Methods

To achieve this, we discuss the potential, current status, and opportunities for alpha therapy and strategies, attempted to date, and important questions that need to be addressed. The paper reviews important concepts, including whom to treat, how to treat, what to expect regarding treatment outcome, and toxicity, and areas requiring further investigations.

Results

There is much excitement about the potential of this field. Much of the potential exists because these therapies utilize unique mechanisms of action, difficult to achieve with other conventional therapies.

Conclusion

A better understanding of the strengths and limitations of PAT may help in creating an effective therapy for mCRPC and design a rational combinatorial approach to treatment by targeting different tumor pathways.

Therapeutic metastatic prostate cancer vaccines: lessons learnt from urologic oncology

INTRODUCTION

Therapeutic cancer vaccines have been recognized as a promising treatment option in clinical oncology for nearly three decades. However, despite many efforts, only one cancer vaccine - sipuleucel-T, activating the anti-PAP (prostatic acid phosphatase) immune response, has obtained Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This review describes the most advanced research on the use of therapeutic cancer vaccines in the treatment of prostate cancer.

RESULTS

In addition to sipuleucel-T, which was approved in urologic oncology in 2010, four cancer vaccines were and have been tested in phase III clinical trials in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): GVAX (prostate cancer variant) containing irradiated prostate cancer cell, PPV peptide vaccine, PCVAC/PCa dendritic cell-based vaccine and PROSTVAC anti PSA (prostate-specific antigen) vaccine. This review compares the most promising and best-studied cancer vaccines: sipuleucel-T and PROSTVAC. Currently, both vaccines have been tested in combination with other therapeutic approaches, including check point inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

It seems possible that the efficacy of sipuleucel-T and PROSTVAC could be increased in combination therapy with other medications.

Real-World Safety and Efficacy Outcomes with Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone or Prednisolone as the First- or Second-Line Treatment for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Data from the Prostate Cancer Registry

BACKGROUND

Despite standard-of-care androgen-deprivation therapy and an increasing number of treatment options, the mortality rate for prostate cancer remains high. Progress to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) necessitates additional treatments. Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone or prednisolone (AAP) prolongs survival in chemotherapy-naive and docetaxel-experienced patients.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the real-world safety and efficacy of AAP as first-line and second-line [post-docetaxel only (AAP-PD)] treatment in patients with mCRPC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Prostate Cancer Registry (PCR) was a prospective, international, observational study of patients with mCRPC in routine clinical practice. Men aged ≥ 18 years with confirmed mCRPC were included. Baseline characteristics, safety (treatment-emergent adverse events, treatment-emergent severe adverse events), and efficacy [progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)] were analyzed.

RESULTS

At baseline, patients who received first-line AAP (n = 754) were generally older than patients who received AAP-PD (n = 354); median age was 76 years and 70 years, respectively. However, the rate of visceral metastasis was higher in the AAP-PD cohort than in the AAP cohort (17.7% vs. 9.6%, respectively). Demographics and disease characteristics of patients with baseline cardiovascular disease were similar to those of the overall registry population. Efficacy outcomes were similar for all patients, regardless of the line of AAP therapy. For first-line AAP and AAP-PD, respectively, the median PFS was 8.9 and 5.8 months for all patients and 9.1 and 6.0 months for patients with cardiovascular comorbidities; median OS was 27.1 and 23.4 months for all patients, and 27.4 and 23.1 months for patients with cardiovascular comorbidities. There were no unexpected adverse events in any patient subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

These real-world data complement the findings from randomized controlled trials, indicating that first- and second-line AAP is well tolerated and effective in patients with mCRPC, including those with underlying CV comorbidities.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02236637, registered 8 September 2014.

Interim and end-treatment 18F-Fluorocholine PET/CT and bone scan in prostate cancer patients treated with Radium 223 dichloride

To assess the predictive and prognostic aim of interim and end-treatment 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT (FCH-PET/CT) and 99mTc-methilen diphosphonate bone scintigraphy (BS) in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases (CRPC-BM) treated with Radium 223 dichloride (223Ra). Prospective and multicentre ChoPET-Rad study including 82 patients with CRPC-BM. Baseline, after 3 (interim) and 6 doses (end-treatment) BS and FCH PET/CT were performed in patients who meet the study criteria. Clinical variables, imaging and clinical progression were obtained and their association with progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) was studied. Agreement between BS and FCH PET/CT response was assessed using Kappa (K) analysis. Median of PFS and OS was 3 and 16 months, respectively. Agreement between interim BS and FCH PET/CT was weak (K: 0.28; p = 0.004). No agreement was observed between end-treatment diagnostic studies. Interim and end-treatment FCH PET/CT were related to PFS (p = 0.011 and p < 0.001, respectively). Therapeutic failure and interim BS and FCH PET/CT showed association with OS (p < 0.001, p = 0.037 and p = 0.008, respectively). Interim and end-treatment FCH PET/CT were good predictors of biochemical progression in patients treated with 223Ra. Therapeutic failure and progression in interim BS or FCH PET/CT were adverse factors for OS.

Subclinical left ventricular dysfunction in men under androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer, revealed by speckle-tracking-derived parameters, repolarization, and myocardial injury markers

Objective

To analyze global left ventricular longitudinal strain (GLS), mechanical dispersion (MD), electrocardiographic repolarization, and myocardial injury markers changes during androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and subsequent hypogonadism in men with advanced prostate cancer.

Methods

We included 31 patients 69.7 ± 7.3 years old, in sinus rhythm, with stable cardiac conditions and evaluated them by echocardiography, electrocardiography, and blood sampling for high sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs‐cTnI), and N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP), at ADT initiation (M0) and after 6 months of treatment (M1). Peak longitudinal strain by speckle‐tracking echocardiography was assessed in 17 left ventricular segments and averaged to GLS. Standard deviation of time intervals from the start of Q/R on electrocardiogram to peak longitudinal strain in the 17 segments (MD_SD), and the difference between the longest and shortest time‐to‐peak strain intervals (MD_delta) were calculated as indices of MD. Fridericia corrected electrocardiographic repolarization parameters were analyzed as follows: QT interval (QTc), mean and maximum values of Tpeak‐Tend interval (Tpe), and Tpe/QT ratio, Tpe dispersion (Tped).

Results

Significant impairments of the following parameters were registered between M0 and M1: GLS (%) (−16.93 ± 3.89; −14.43 ± 3.57, P < .001), MD_SD (ms) (77.4 ± 21.4; 89 ± 27, P = .004), MD_delta (ms) (225.3 ± 78.3; 259.9 ± 108.4, P = .02), QTc (ms) (458.8 ± 43.4; 485.6 ± 45.1, P = .01), maxTpe/QT (0.246 ± 0.04; 0.268 ± 0.04, P = .01), maxTpe (ms) (105.4 ± 23.2; 119.5 ± 26.4 P = .01), meanTpe (ms) (83.3 ± 16.8; 90.7 ± 19.3, P = .02), and hs‐cTnI (ng/mL) (4.6 ± 5.4; 5.4 ± 6.4, P = .01). Mean serum testosterone level at M1 was 0.1 ± 0.13 ng/mL. The patients’ clinical cardiological status remained stable during follow‐up.

Conclusions

ADT and subsequent hypogonadism induce subclinical alterations in GLS, MD, electrocardiographic repolarization parameters, and hs‐cTnI during the first 6 months of treatment.

Real-World Outcomes in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: The Prostate Cancer Registry

BACKGROUND

Metastatic prostate cancer has a 30% 5-year survival rate despite recent therapeutic advances. There is a need to improve the clinical understanding and treatment of this disease, particularly in the real-world setting and among patients who are under-represented in clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients who received their first treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in routine clinical practice, independent of treatment used, including subgroups with baseline cardiac disease, diabetes mellitus, or visceral metastases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prospective, noninterventional analysis of patient record data in the multicenter Prostate Cancer Registry (PCR) of men with mCRPC. The data were collected in 16 countries with the aim of recruiting more than 3000 patients between 2013 and 2016. The study end date was 9 July 2018. Data evaluated included baseline characteristics, treatment exposure, and efficacy outcomes [overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP)] of patients treated with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone or prednisolone (collectively, "abiraterone"), enzalutamide, or docetaxel. Descriptive outcomes are reported from the overall patient population and subgroups of patients with baseline cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, or visceral metastases. The treatment effects for time to progression were compared for the overall patient population.

RESULTS

The study enrollment period lasted 2.5 years, and each patient was followed for a maximum of 3 years. A total of 1874 patients in the PCR had not received previous mCRPC treatment at baseline, although they had received androgen-deprivation therapy. Prevalent co-morbidities included cardiovascular disease in 65.4% and diabetes mellitus in 17.4% of patients. Baseline characteristics suggested that patients with more advanced disease received docetaxel treatment. In the overall patient population, the median time to progression with abiraterone, enzalutamide, and docetaxel as first-line mCRPC therapy was 9.6, 10.3, and 7.6 months, respectively, and median OS was 27.1, 27.1, and 27.9 months, respectively. Outcomes in the subgroups of patients with cardiovascular disease or diabetes mellitus were similar to those of the whole population in the analysis. As expected, patients with visceral metastases had shorter TTP and OS than patients in the overall population.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis shows, for the first time, the effectiveness in parallel of first-line abiraterone, enzalutamide, and docetaxel in mCRPC, including in patients with co-morbidities such as cardiovascular disease or diabetes mellitus or in patients with visceral metastases. These real-world findings from the PCR provide meaningful information to help manage mCRPC, particularly in patients under-represented in clinical studies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02236637; registered September 2014.

Radium-223 therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: survival benefit when used earlier in the treatment pathway

BACKGROUND

Radium-223 dichloride (Ra-223) therapy improves overall survival in bony metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. Recent guidance change recommends Ra-223 following at least two prior therapies for mCRPC. We evaluated how this change affects overall survival and the optimal timing of Ra-223 in the mCRPC treatment pathway.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all mCRPC patients receiving Ra-223 therapy at a single UK centre over a 70-month period. Overall survival, number of prior lines of therapy commenced before Ra-223 initiation and number of Ra-223 therapy cycles completed were identified.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-one mCRPC patients received Ra-223 therapy during the study period. One hundred twenty-one (63%) received one prior therapy (group 1) and 70 (37%) received two prior therapies (group 2). Median survival in group 1 was significantly improved, compared to group 2 (448 days vs. 341 days (P = 0.03). Subgroup analysis of 111/191 (58%) patients that completed the recommended six Ra-223 therapy cycles showed additional improved survival. Median survival in group 1 was incrementally significantly improved, compared to group 2 within these patients (665 days vs. 552 days; P = 0.05). There was no difference in the number of patients completing the recommenced six cycles of therapy between the groups [72/121 (59%) vs. 39/70 (56%); P = 0.61].

CONCLUSION

We found a significant survival benefit when Ra-223 was used earlier in the mCRPC treatment pathway, with additional survival advantage seen in those patients completing all six Ra-223 cycles. Our results support the use of Ra-223 earlier in the treatment pathway.

Evolution of Electrocardiographic Repolarization Parameters During Antiandrogen Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer and Hypogonadism

We assessed the effects of antiandrogen therapy on ECG parameters of ventricular repolarization related to arrhythmic risk in 35 patients aged 70.3 ± 7 years with advanced prostate cancer treated with degarelix associated with enzalutamide (group A, 26 patients) or degarelix monotherapy (group B, 9 patients). We analyzed Fridericia corrected Q-T interval (QTc), Q-T dispersion (QTd), J-Tpeak interval (JTp), mean and maximum Tpeak-Tend interval (Tpe) and Tpe/QT ratio, Tpeak-Tend dispersion (Tped), index of cardio-electrophysiological balance (iCEB) from ECG tracings, and occurrence of ventricular premature beats (VPB) recorded by Holter ECG, before initiation of medication (M0) and after 6 months of treatment (M1). The groups had similar demographics except for a higher prevalence of prior myocardial infarction in group B (p = 0.01). All patients had low serum testosterone at M1. Baseline QTc, QTd, maxTpe/QT, meanTpe, maxTpe, Tped values were higher in B compared to A. They had a significant prolongation at M1 only in A. 20 patients in A and 6 in B had a 10% prolongation or decrease of iCEB (p = 0.66). In 5 patients, VPB severity increased from non-complex to complex: 3 in A and 2 in B (p = 0.31), but no sustained ventricular arrhythmia was registered. In conclusion, after 6 months of treatment, patients with hypogonadism on degarelix associated with enzalutamide had significant prolongation of QTc, QTd, maxTpe, meanTpe/QT, maxTpe/QT, Tped compared to patients on degarelix alone. The proportion of patients with 10% iCEB variation was similar between groups. There was no record of severe arrhythmias during the first 6 months of treatment.

Overall survival in mCPRC patients treated with Radium-223 in association with bone health agents: a national multicenter study

PURPOSE

Radium-223 has demonstrated efficacy in improving overall survival (OS) and in delaying symptomatic skeletal-related events (SREs). Bone Health Agents (BHA), i.e. RANK ligand inhibitor (Denosumab) and bisphosphonate such as zoledronic acid, are indicated to prevent SREs without a clear survival benefit. SREs on patient health have a high impact and it is, therefore, important to consider the role of new therapies with BHA to better understand the involvement of combination therapy. The primary aim of this multicentric study is to assess OS in mCRPC patients treated with Radium-223 in combination with BHA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

430 consecutive patients treated with Radium-223 alone or in combination with BHA, affected by mCRPC, from January 2015 to July 2019 in six Italian Nuclear Medicine Units, were included. Furthermore, data were collected at baseline, after every Radium-223 administration, and during follow-up, at 3 and 6 months and 1 year after the 6th cycle. Clinical data have been evaluated before starting treatment with Radium-223 and at the end of treatment and/or at progression. Patients who received target bone therapy with BHA before Radium-223 treatment together with patients who did not receive this therapy at all (NO BHA GROUP), were compared to patients treated with concomitant Radium-223 and BHA (BHA GROUP).

RESULTS

In univariate models (p < .05) several clinical aspects have an impact on OS: concomitant BHA (p = .018), BMI (p .001), ECOG PS (p = .000), Baseline Hb (p = .000), Baseline PSA (p = .000), Baseline tALP (p = .000), Baseline LDH (p = .000), and Baseline neutrophils (p = .009). Baseline Hb, Baseline tALP, and Baseline LDH have been confirmed as statistically significant parameters in multivariate models. Indeed, concomitant BHA has not a significant impact on OS (p = .244) in multivariate models.

CONCLUSIONS

At univariate analysis, our data showed that NO BHA GROUP and BHA GROUP differ in OS by 7 months (95%CI: (1-16.4), p = .02). This is not confirmed at multivariate analysis where after adjusting for other baseline factors, BHA is not significant anymore. This is clearly explained as bias by indication: patients with the same levels of tALP, Hb, and LDH receiving or not receiving BHA are expected to have a similar survival. Our results support and confirm the role of Radium-223 therapy on OS and, furthermore, appear to confirm that BHA treatment has not a survival benefit.

A phase I/II study of docetaxel in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Taxanes and anthracyclines have been among the best-studied chemotherapy classes in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Docetaxel (D) 75 mg/m² every 3 weeks has been the standard first line chemotherapy for CRPC. Encapsulation of doxorubicin in polyethylene glycol-coated liposomes (PLD) was developed to enhance the safety and efficacy of conventional doxorubicin. We hypothesize that the combination of weekly low dose-D and PLD would result in a high response rate and low toxicity. Eligibility criteria included metastatic progressive CRPC, no prior D or PLD and good organ function. After a short phase I with no dose-limiting toxicity, D 30 mg/m² was administered on days 1, 8 and 15; and PLD 30 mg/m² on day 1 only, every 28 days. Thirty-seven patients were enrolled. The PSA response rate was 53%. Twenty-two subjects had measurable disease; one (5%) achieved complete response, five (23%) partial response, and twelve (54%) stable disease. Twenty-seven patients (73%) manifested pain relief. The median time to progression was 3.7 months for all patients and 7.9 months for responders. Median overall survival was 16.3 months. Grade 4 neutropenia without infection and anemia occurred in 1 patient each. Grade 3 treatment-related toxicities included: 15% fatigue; 9% neutropenia, anemia and nausea; 6% dehydration and hand-foot syndrome; and 3% infection, febrile neutropenia, thrombosis, stomatitis, headache, vomiting, weight loss and weakness. In this non-comparative study D-PLD demonstrated a higher activity than previously reported with single agent D with favorable side effect profile. A phase 3 study would be needed to evaluate the true benefit of this combination.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00456989.

Cell Membrane-Inspired Polymeric Vesicles for Combined Photothermal and Photodynamic Prostate Cancer Therapy

Photothermal therapy (PTT) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) have emerged as highly prospective therapeutic modalities in cancer therapy. Notwithstanding, a critical challenge still remains in the exploration of an effective strategy to maximize the synergistic efficacy of PTT and PDT due to low photoconversion efficiency. Herein, inspired by the phospholipid bimolecular structure of the cell membrane, bionic cell membrane polymeric vesicles with photothermal/photodynamic synergy for prostate cancer therapy at one wavelength's excitation are constructed in one step by the coordination of hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) from the surface of hydrophobic gold nanorods (AuNRs) with indocyanine green (ICG) and polycaprolactone (PCL), achieving their self-assembly in aqueous solutions. Importantly, the aggregation of the assembly improves the stability of the vesicles, realizing the synergistic effect of PTT and PDT for prostate cancer therapy. After being assembled within polymeric vesicles, bifunctional photosensitizer ICG can generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) and photothermal effect under light treatment. Their ROS not only induce PDT efficacy but also destroy the integrity of the lysosomal membrane, promoting the translocation of ICG and another photosensitizer called gold nanorods (AuNRs) into the cytosol. Moreover, their photothermal effects produced by both photosensitizers are able to engender greater damage to the tumor cells because of the close distance with organelles. This structure manifests good cellular uptake, highly effective tumor accumulation, high photothermal conversion efficiency, and excellent properties of enhanced photobleaching resistance, which are beneficial to ICG-based fluorescence tumor imaging. Using the same near-infrared (NIR) wavelength for excitation, the AuNR/ICG vesicles can reduce the side effect rate of photodamage on the skin. In addition, by generating reactive oxygen species (ROS) and double photothermal effect, the vesicles under NIR excitation can promote the apoptosis of PC3 tumor cells. Taken together, the spontaneous self-assembled AuNR/ICG vesicles exhibit huge potential in advanced-stage prostate cancer therapy, especially for the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-negative castration-resistant subtype.

Efficacy of abiraterone acetate in castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer: A real-world data analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of abiraterone in patients with castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 51 patients with mCRPC treated with abiraterone acetate from January 2014 to August 2018. Clinicopathological information, treatment modalities, treatment responses, and survival times were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 51 patients who received abiraterone 1000 mg/day + prednisone 10 mg/day between January 2014 and August 2018 were included in the study. Of these patients, 33 (64.7%) had post-chemotherapy (CT) and 18 (35.3%) had CT-naive abiraterone receipt. Median overall survival (OS) was 17.3 months (range 9.3-33.1). Median OS was found to be 12.7 months (range 9.4-18.3) and 29.4 months (range 9.3-33.0) in the CT-naive and post-CT group, respectively (P = .236). Median radiographic PFS (rPFS) was 10.1 months (range 4.5-18.4). In the CT-naive group, rPFS was 10.1 months (IQR 6.0-14.7) and in the post-CT group, it was 9.7 months (range 4.0-18.4) (P = .808). PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) was 9.1 months (range 4.6-13.1). In the CT-naive group, PSA-PFS was 7.4 months (range 4.6-13.4) and in post-CT, it was 9.1 months (range 4.8-13.1) (P = .843).

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that abiraterone acetate is an effective and reliable agent in real-life data.

Optimizing the role of androgen deprivation therapy in advanced prostate cancer: Challenges beyond the guidelines

BACKGROUND

For specific clinical indications, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) will induce disease prostate cancer (PC) regression, relieve symptoms and prolong survival; however, ADT has a well-described range of side effects, which may have a detrimental effect on the patient's quality of life, necessitating additional interventions or changes in PC treatment. The risk-benefit analysis for initiating ADT in PC patients throughout the PC disease continuum warrants review.

METHODS

A 14-member panel comprised of urologic and medical oncologists were chosen for an expert review panel, to provide guidance on a more judicious use of ADT in advanced PC patients. Panel members were chosen based upon their academic and community experience and expertise in the management of PC patients. Four academic members of the panel served as group leaders; the remaining eight panel members were from Large Urology Group Practice Association practices with proven experience in leading their advanced PC clinics. The panel members were assigned to four separate working groups, and were tasked with addressing the role of ADT in specific PC settings.

RESULTS

This article describes the practical recommendations of an expert panel for the use of ADT throughout the PC disease continuum, as well as an algorithm summarizing the key recommendations. The target for this publication is all providers (urologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, or advanced practice providers) who evaluate and manage advanced PC patients, regardless of their practice setting.

CONCLUSION

The panel has provided recommendations for monitoring PC patients while on ADT, recognizing that PC patients will progress despite testosterone suppression and, therefore, early identification of conversion from castrate-sensitive to castration resistance is critical. Also, the requirement to both identify and mitigate side effects of ADT as well as the importance of quality of life maintenance are essential to the optimization of patient care, especially as more combinatorial therapeutic strategies with ADT continue to emerge.

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Academic insights and perspectives through bibliometric analysis

BACKGROUND

In recent years, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (MCRPC) and studies related to MCRPC have drawn global attention. The main objective of this bibliometric study was to provide an overview of MCRPC, explore clusters and trends in research and investigate the future direction of MCRPC research.

METHODS

A total of 4089 publications published between 1979 and 2018 were retrieved from the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection database. Different aspects of MCRPC research, including the countries/territories, institutions, journals, authors, research areas, funding agencies and author keywords, were analyzed.

RESULTS

The number of annual MCRPC publications increased rapidly after 2010. American researchers played a vital role in this increase, as they published the most publications. The most productive institution was Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. De Bono, JS (the United Kingdom [UK]) and Scher, HI (the United States of America [USA]) were the two most productive authors. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded the largest number of published papers. Analyses of keywords suggested that therapies (abiraterone, enzalutamide, etc.) would attract global attention after US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval.

CONCLUSIONS

Developed countries, especially the USA, were the leading nations for MCRPC research because of their abundant funding and frequent international collaborations. Therapy was one of the most vital aspects of MCRPC research. Therapies targeting DNA repair or the androgen receptor (AR) signing pathway and new therapies especially prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based radioligand therapy (RLT) would be the next focus of MCRPC research.

Patient expectations of benefit from systemic treatments for metastatic prostate cancer

Background

Metastatic prostate cancer is incurable, but systemic therapies can improve quality of life and prolong survival. Accurate perceptions of treatment risks and benefits are vital as patients with metastatic disease make treatment decisions. We assessed treatment‐related expectations for benefit among patients with metastatic prostate cancer and explored associated sociodemographic characteristics.

Methods

Men with metastatic prostate cancer (N = 100) completed surveys assessing their treatment‐related expectations for cancer cure, symptom relief, and prolonged life expectancy. Frequencies were used to describe the proportions of reported expectations. Fisher's exact tests were used to assess the associations of sociodemographic characteristics with treatment expectations.

Results

One third (33%) of participants believed treatment was at least a little likely to cure their metastatic cancer. Most participants believed treatment could provide symptom relief (76%) and extend life expectancy (95%). Among participants reporting that cancer cure was at least a little likely vs not at all, more men identified as non‐white (24% vs 5%; P = .01), self‐reported good health (90% vs 58%; P < .01), and had greater optimism (78% vs 47%; P < .01). Among participants reporting that symptom relief was at least a little likely vs not at all, more men were less than 70 years old (62% vs 0%; P = .01).

Conclusion

A large proportion of patients with metastatic prostate cancer reported beliefs inconsistent with understanding that treatment was not curative. Race, better self‐reported health, and greater optimism were related to unrealistic expectations. Efforts to ensure alignment of patient and clinician expectations may facilitate more effective shared decision‐making for treating metastatic disease.

Primary Radical Prostatectomy or Ablative Radiotherapy as Protective Factors for Patients With mCRPC Treated With Radium-223 Dichloride: An Italian Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

We investigated, in a real-life setting, the prognostic relevance of previous primary treatment (radical prostatectomy [RP] or external beam radiotherapy [EBRT]) on overall survival for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with radium-223 (²²³Ra).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the present multicenter retrospective study, we enrolled 275 consecutive patients. The demographic and clinical data and mCRPC characteristics were recorded and evaluated at baseline and at the end of treatment or progression. ²²³Ra was administered according to the current label authorization until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. We divided the whole cohort into 2 groups: those who had undergone primary radical prostatectomy or ablative radiotherapy (RP/EBRT) and those who had not received previous primary treatment (NO).

RESULTS

Of the 275 patients, 128 (46.5%) were alive and undergoing monitoring at the last follow-up examination, 103 (37.4%) had stopped treatment because of disease progression or the onset of comorbidities, and 147 (53.5%) had died during the study period. Of the 275 patients, 132 were in the RP/EBRT group (48%), of whom 93 had undergone RP and 76 had undergone ablative EBRT, and 143 patients were in the NO group (52%). The data showed a clear advantage for the patients in the RP/EBRT group compared with those in the NO group, with an estimated median survival of 18 versus 11 months, respectively (P < .001). The results from the multivariate analysis corroborated this trend, with a hazard ratio of 0.7 (P = .0443), confirming the better outcome for the RP/EBRT group.

CONCLUSIONS

Previous radical treatment provides a protective role for patients with mCRPC undergoing ²²³Ra treatment.

Cardiovascular and Metabolic Effects of Androgen-Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer

Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) entails lowering serum testosterone levels to castrate levels and forms a cornerstone of the management of hormone-sensitive advanced prostate cancer; however, the benefit of ADT is partially offset by its detrimental metabolic and cardiovascular adverse effects. ADT decreases insulin sensitivity while promoting dyslipidemia and sarcopenic obesity, which leads to an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and potentially mortality. The risk seems to be highest in elderly patients who have had recent cardiovascular events before starting ADT. It is prudent to engage in an individualized risk-benefit discussion and develop a cohesive multidisciplinary management plan to medically optimize and closely observe these patients before and during treatment with ADT.

Real-world outcomes of sipuleucel-T treatment in PROCEED, a prospective registry of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

The large registry, PROVENGE Registry for the Observation, Collection, and Evaluation of Experience Data (PROCEED)(NCT01306890), evaluated sipuleucel-T immunotherapy for asymptomatic/minimally symptomatic metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

METHODS

PROCEED enrolled patients with mCRPC receiving 3 biweekly sipuleucel-T infusions. Assessments included overall survival (OS), serious adverse events (SAEs), cerebrovascular events (CVEs), and anticancer interventions (ACIs). Follow-up was for ≥3 years or until death or study withdrawal.

RESULTS

In 2011-2017, 1976 patients were followed for 46.6 months (median). The median age was 72 years, and the baseline median prostate-specific antigen level was 15.0 ng/mL; 86.7% were white, and 11.6% were African American. Among the patients, 1902 had 1 or more sipuleucel-T infusions. The median OS was 30.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.6-32.2 months). Known prognostic factors were independently associated with OS in a multivariable analysis. Among the 1255 patients who died, 964 (76.8%) died of prostate cancer (PC) progression. The median time from the first infusion to PC death was 42.7 months (95% CI, 39.4-46.2 months). The incidence of sipuleucel-T-related SAEs was 3.9%. The incidence of CVEs was 2.8%, and the rate per 100 person-years was 1.2 (95% CI, 0.9-1.6). The CVE incidence among 11,972 patients with mCRPC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database was 2.8%; the rate per 100 person-years was 1.5 (95% CI, 1.4-1.7). One or more ACIs (abiraterone, enzalutamide, docetaxel, cabazitaxel, or radium 223) were received by 77.1% of the patients after sipuleucel-T; 32.5% and 17.4% of the patients experienced 1- and 2-year treatment-free intervals, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

PROCEED provides contemporary survival data for sipuleucel-T-treated men in a real-world setting of new life-prolonging agents, which will be useful in discussing treatment options with patients and in powering future trials with sipuleucel-T. The safety and tolerability of sipuleucel-T in PROCEED were consistent with previous findings.

The role of ketoconazole in current prostate cancer care

Ketoconazole is a nonselective steroid 17α-hydroxylase/17,20 lyase (CYP17A1) inhibitor that has been used, off-label, as a second-line therapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The drug has shown clinical efficacy without survival benefit. Despite not improving survival, ketoconazole has beneficial characteristics, such as its low cost, a relatively favourable toxicity profile compared with chemotherapy, and its efficacy both before and after chemotherapy. The approval of several new, highly effective treatments, including abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, and apalutamide, warrants re-evaluation of the role of ketoconazole and other classic agents in achieving the optimal timing and sequencing of available agents to prolong survival and maintain patients' quality of life. In the current CRPC treatment landscape, we believe that ketoconazole can be considered in patients with nonmetastatic CRPC and in those with metastatic CRPC who do not respond to, tolerate, or have access to chemotherapy and other standard therapeutic options.

Patient and Provider Variables Associated with Variation in the Systemic Treatment of Advanced Prostate Cancer

Purpose

Six treatments have improved overall survival in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), each differing in toxicities and cost. This study identified patient and provider factors associated with variation in treatment of men with mCRPC to identify potential barriers to treatments.

Methods

A claims database of commercially insured patients was used to identify patients with prostate cancer treated with abiraterone, enzalutamide, docetaxel, cabazitaxel, sipuleucel-T, or radium-223 between 2010 and 2016. Multinomial and binomial logistic regressions were conducted to determine patient and provider factors associated with treatment patterns.

Results

Among 5,575 patients identified, patients with a household income >$99,000 were less likely to receive an expensive oral androgen signaling inhibitor (abiraterone or enzalutamide) as first-line treatment versus docetaxel compared to patients with a household income <$50,000 (odds ratio, OR, 0.66, 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.48-0.92). Patients who are Black (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.02-2.01), live in the Pacific region versus the South Atlantic (OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.74-4.11), received treatment from a urologist versus a medical oncologist (OR 16.05, 95% CI 6.01-42.86), or had pre-existing heart failure (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.18-2.42) were more likely to receive first-line oral androgen signaling inhibitors over docetaxel, independent of other factors on multivariable analysis.

Conclusion

Clinicians and policy makers should be aware of the potential barriers and provider factors that influence use of novel therapies among patients with advanced prostate cancer, including the paradoxical effect of income and the substantial effect of provider specialty on first-line treatment rendered to patients with mCRPC.

Radium-223 in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Clinical Development and Use in Contemporary Practice

Radium-223 is a first-in-class alpha particle-emitting radionuclide. Unlike the beta emitters whose development preceded it and whose use has largely been limited to symptom palliation, radium-223 has been shown to meaningfully alter the natural history of bone-predominant metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and improve overall survival. This review-a précis of a lecture given at the Eleventh International Symposium on Targeted Alpha Therapy in April 2019-discusses the radiobiological properties of radium-223, summarizes its clinical development over the past decade, and situates it in the current therapeutic landscape for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Workflow Requirements for Cost-of-Care Conversations in Outpatient Settings Providing Oncology or Primary Care: A Qualitative, Human-Centered Design Study

BACKGROUND

Patients prefer to discuss costs in the clinical setting, but physicians and teams may be unprepared to incorporate cost discussions into existing workflows.

OBJECTIVE

To understand and improve clinical workflows related to cost-of-care conversations.

DESIGN

Qualitative human-centered design study.

SETTING

2 integrated health systems in the U.S. Pacific Northwest: a system-wide oncology service line and a system-wide primary care service line.

PARTICIPANTS

Clinicians, clinical team members, operations staff, and patients.

MEASUREMENTS

Ethnographic observations were made at the integrated health systems, assessing barriers to and facilitators of discussing costs with patients. Three unique patient experiences of having financial concerns addressed in the clinic were designed. These experiences were refined after in-person interviews with patients (n = 20). Data were synthesized into a set of clinical workflow requirements.

RESULTS

Most patient cost concerns take 1 of 3 pathways: informing clinical care decision making, planning and budgeting concerns, and addressing immediate financial hardship. Workflow requirements include organizational recognition of the need for clinic-based cost-of-care conversations; access to cost and health plan benefit data to support each conversation pathway; clear team member roles and responsibilities for addressing cost-of-care concerns; a patient experience where cost questions are normal and each patient's preferences and privacy are respected; patients know who to go to with cost questions; patients' concerns are documented to minimize repetition to multiple team members; and patients learn their expected out-of-pocket costs before treatment begins.

LIMITATION

Results may have limited generalizability to other health care settings, and the study did not test the effectiveness of the workflows developed.

CONCLUSION

Clinic-based workflows for cost-of-care conversations that optimize patients' care experience require organizational commitment to addressing cost concerns, clear roles and responsibilities, appropriate and complete data access, and a team-based approach.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

A Phase II Study of PX-866 in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Canadian Cancer Trials Group Study IND205

BACKGROUND

In PTEN-loss models, the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT and androgen receptor signaling pathways cross-regulate by reciprocal feedback whereby inhibition of one activates the other, creating a rationale for co-targeting. We studied the irreversible, pan-isoform inhibitor of Class I PI-3K PX-866 singly (part A) and with abiraterone acetate (AA) in patients on AA with rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (part B).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The primary endpoint was lack of progression at 12 weeks. Exploratory endpoints included changes in circulating tumor cells (CTC), pharmacodynamic studies on platelets (part A), and archival tumor exploration of PTEN as predictor of response (part B).

RESULTS

A total of 43 and 25 patients accrued to parts A and B, respectively. In part A, 14 (33%) patients were progression-free at 12 weeks, with 2 partial objective responses and 1 confirmed PSA response. Favorable CTC conversion (< 5 CTC/7.5 mL) occurred in 6 (24%) of 25 evaluable patients. In part B, 11 of 25 patients had measurable disease. Six (24%) patients were progression-free at 12 weeks. No objective or PSA responses were observed. For all 68 patients, the most common toxicities were diarrhea (53 patients), nausea (36), anorexia (24), fatigue (22), and vomiting (20). Among 17 patients for whom PTEN testing was possible, 3 had PTEN homozygous deletion and 14 had no change. No correlation between PTEN status and response was seen.

CONCLUSIONS

PX-866 had modest single agent activity. Adding AA to PX-866 showed no evidence of resistance reversal. Strategies to combine PI3K inhibition with androgen receptor-targeted therapies could consider initiation earlier, combination with other agents, and/or recruiting a selected population.

Phase III Trial of PROSTVAC in Asymptomatic or Minimally Symptomatic Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

PROSTVAC, a viral vector–based immunotherapy, prolonged median overall survival (OS) by 8.5 months versus placebo in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in a phase II study. This phase III study further investigated those findings.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to PROSTVAC (Arm V; n = 432), PROSTVAC plus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (Arm VG; n = 432), or placebo (Arm P; n = 433), stratified by prostate-specific antigen (less than 50 ng/mL v 50 ng/mL or more) and lactate dehydrogenase (less than 200 v 200 U/L or more). Primary end point was OS. Secondary end points were patients alive without events (AWE)—namely, radiographic progression, pain progression, chemotherapy initiation, or death—at 6 months and safety. The study design was a superiority trial of PROSTVAC (Arm V or Arm VG) versus Arm P. Three interim analyses were planned.

RESULTS

At the third interim analysis, criteria for futility were met and the trial was stopped early. Neither active treatment had an effect on median OS (Arm V, 34.4 months; hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.20; P = .47; Arm VG, 33.2 months; hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.22; P = .59; Arm P, 34.3 months). Likewise, AWE at 6 months was similar (Arm V, 29.4%; odds ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.29; Arm VG, 28.0%; odds ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.20; placebo, 30.3%). Adverse events were similar for the treatment and placebo groups, with the most common being injection site reactions (62% to 72%) and fatigue (21% to 24%). Arrhythmias were the most common cardiac-related events (1.4% to 3.5%). There were no reports of either myocarditis or pericarditis. Serious treatment-related events occurred in less than 1% of all patients.

CONCLUSION

Whereas PROSTVAC was safe and well tolerated, it had no effect on OS or AWE in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Combination therapy is currently being explored in clinical trials.