1
|
Teng YT, Wang YA, Dong YH, Liu JJ. Five-year survival prognosis of young, middle-aged, and elderly adult female invasive breast cancer patients by clinical and lifestyle characteristics. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024; 205:619-631. [PMID: 38526687 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07280-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Early-onset breast cancer incidence has been increasing globally and in Taiwan. However, previous studies have not comprehensively examined how clinical and lifestyle characteristics influence the 5-year survival of breast cancer diagnosed at different stages of adulthood. METHODS We analyzed the Taiwan National Cancer Registry and Cause of Death datasets to understand how clinical factors (including tumor and treatment characteristics) and lifestyle factors (including body mass index, cigarette smoking, and alcohol consumption) were associated with the 5-year survival of 8471 young, 57,695 middle-aged, and 14,074 elderly female adult invasive breast cancer patients respectively diagnosed at age 20-39, 40-64, and ≥ 65 years between 2002 and 2015, with mortality follow-up to 2020. Poisson regression was used for obtaining the crude and adjusted 5-year survival risk ratios. RESULTS Clinical and lifestyle characteristics were distributed differently but had mostly similar direction of association with 5-year survival for the three age groups. Receiving any treatment was associated with better survival, especially for elderly patients. Being underweight at initial cancer treatment was associated with worse survival than having normal weight, especially for elderly patients. Current smokers had worse survival than never smokers for middle-aged and elderly patients. The 5-year breast cancer-specific survival was not significantly higher for those of age 45-49 years than 40-44 years, despite the recommended starting screening age is 45 years in Taiwan. CONCLUSION Our findings contribute to the understanding of early-onset and later-onset female breast cancer characteristics and prognosis, which may inform surveillance and treatment strategies to achieve better breast cancer prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Tung Teng
- Institute of Public Health, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, No.155, Sec. 2, Linong St., Beitou District, Taipei, 112, Taiwan
| | - Yong Alison Wang
- Koo Foundation Sun-Yat Sen Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yaa-Hui Dong
- Institute of Public Health, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, No.155, Sec. 2, Linong St., Beitou District, Taipei, 112, Taiwan
- Department of Pharmacy, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jason J Liu
- Institute of Public Health, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, No.155, Sec. 2, Linong St., Beitou District, Taipei, 112, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bian Z, Zhang R, Yuan S, Fan R, Wang L, Larsson SC, Theodoratou E, Zhu Y, Wu S, Ding Y, Li X. Healthy lifestyle and cancer survival: A multinational cohort study. Int J Cancer 2024; 154:1709-1718. [PMID: 38230569 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
Lifestyle factors after a cancer diagnosis could influence the survival of cancer 60 survivors. To examine the independent and joint associations of healthy lifestyle factors with mortality outcomes among cancer survivors, four prospective cohorts (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES], National Health Interview Survey [NHIS], UK Biobank [UKB] and Kailuan study) across three countries. A healthy lifestyle score (HLS) was defined based on five common lifestyle factors (smoking, alcohol drinking, diet, physical activity and body mass index) that related to cancer survival. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) for the associations of individual lifestyle factors and HLS with all-cause and cancer mortality among cancer survivors. During the follow-up period of 37,095 cancer survivors, 8927 all-cause mortality events were accrued in four cohorts and 4449 cancer death events were documented in the UK and US cohorts. Never smoking (adjusted HR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.69-0.86), light alcohol consumption (adjusted HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.82-0.90), adequate physical activity (adjusted HR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.85-0.94), a healthy diet (adjusted HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.61-0.78) and optimal BMI (adjusted HR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.85-0.93) were significantly associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality. In the joint analyses of HLS, the HR of all-cause and cancer mortality for cancer survivors with a favorable HLS (4 and 5 healthy lifestyle factors) were 0.55 (95% CI 0.42-0.64) and 0.57 (95% CI 0.44-0.72), respectively. This multicohort study of cancer survivors from the United States, the United Kingdom and China found that greater adherence to a healthy lifestyle might be beneficial in improving cancer prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zilong Bian
- Department of Big Data in Health Science, School of Public Health and Center of Clinical Big Data and Analytics of The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Biostatistics, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Rongqi Zhang
- Department of Big Data in Health Science, School of Public Health and Center of Clinical Big Data and Analytics of The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shuai Yuan
- Unit of Cardiovascular and Nutritional Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Rong Fan
- Department of Big Data in Health Science, School of Public Health and Center of Clinical Big Data and Analytics of The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Lijuan Wang
- Centre for Global Health, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Susanna C Larsson
- Unit of Cardiovascular and Nutritional Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Unit of Medical Epidemiology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Evropi Theodoratou
- Centre for Global Health, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Medical Research Council Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Yimin Zhu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shouling Wu
- Department of Cardiology, Kailuan General Hospital, Tangshan, China
| | - Yuan Ding
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xue Li
- Department of Big Data in Health Science, School of Public Health and Center of Clinical Big Data and Analytics of The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Centre for Global Health, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Uong SP, Torres JM, Alexeeff SE, Morey BN, Caan BJ, Kushi LH, Kroenke CH. Differences in Smoking Behavior by Nativity, Race/Ethnicity, and Education among Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024; 33:694-702. [PMID: 38345508 PMCID: PMC11062809 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-23-0386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Revised: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We evaluated smoking differences across nativity and race/ethnicity among women diagnosed with breast cancer. METHODS In our Northern Californian pooled population of 5,653 [670 Asian, 690 Hispanic, and 4,300 non-Hispanic White (White)] women diagnosed with breast cancer, we evaluated smoking differences across nativity, race/ethnicity, and acculturation and effect modification of nativity by race/ethnicity and education. RESULTS Foreign-born women currently smoked less than US-born women [odds ratio (OR) = 0.46, 95% confidence limit (CL): 0.29-0.72]. Hispanic (OR = 0.50; 95% CL: 0.32-0.78) women currently smoked less than White women. Among those who ever smoked (n = 2,557), foreign-born women smoked 5.23 fewer pack-years (PY) than US-born women (95% CL: -2.75 to -7.70). Furthermore, Asian (-4.60, 95% CL: -0.81 to -8.39) and Hispanic (-6.79, 95% CL: -4.14 to -9.43) women smoked fewer PY than White women. Associations were generally suggestive of greater smoking with greater acculturation (immigration age, US years, survey language). Finally, associations for nativity differed by education but not race/ethnicity, with a higher likelihood of smoking in US-born women only among those with less than a bachelor's degree (OR = 2.84, 95% CL: 2.15-3.77; current smoking: P = 0.01, PY: P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Asian and Hispanic (vs. White) and foreign-born (vs. US-born) breast cancer survivors reported fewer smoking behaviors. Smoking differences across nativity and education were driven by higher rates of smoking in US-born women with lower educational attainment. IMPACT Smoking behavioral patterns were similar among breast cancer survivors and the general population, informing potential smoking interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen P. Uong
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Division of Research, Oakland, CA
| | | | - Stacey E. Alexeeff
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Division of Research, Oakland, CA
| | | | - Bette J. Caan
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Division of Research, Oakland, CA
| | - Lawrence H. Kushi
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Division of Research, Oakland, CA
| | - Candyce H. Kroenke
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Division of Research, Oakland, CA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Maselli D. Strategies for tobacco-free survivorship after breast cancer: The possible weaving of preoperative care and public health policies. Public Health Nurs 2024; 41:403-405. [PMID: 38317425 DOI: 10.1111/phn.13293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
Among smoker women with breast cancer quitting smoking has been shown to increase survival and surgical outcomes. Where surgery is indicated, the preoperative seems to be a crucial moment for smoking cessation interventions as it enhances recovery after surgery and motivates prolonged tobacco abstinence. Timing and frequency of preoperative quitting conversations were variables associated with quitting. An early, multidisciplinary, and personalized approach is recommended. A solid integration between primary care services and specialized care is challenging but feasible, implementing prehabilitation pathways that include tobacco treatment routinely as an integral part of breast cancer care. Smoking cessation programs before surgical procedures impact recidivism prevention, survivorship improvement, public health, and cost savings. The contribution of healthcare professionals can make a difference in tobacco control, collaborating with organizations, public health, and nursing research. Integrated solutions in oncological clinical care pathways might help patients build and maintain tobacco abstinence after breast cancer. Future research shall study when patients should abstain from smoking before oncological breast surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Maselli
- International Doctorate School in Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Guo Q, Lu Y, Liu W, Lan G, Lan T. The global, regional, and national disease burden of breast cancer attributable to tobacco from 1990 to 2019: a global burden of disease study. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:107. [PMID: 38184557 PMCID: PMC10770986 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-17405-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/08/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Tobacco has been identified as a significant contributory element to the development of breast cancer. Our objective was to evaluate the spatiotemporal trends of tobacco-related breast cancer at the global, regional, and national scales during 1990-2019. METHODS We extracted data on mortality, disability adjusted of life years (DALYs), age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR), and age-standardized DALYs rate (ASDR) from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study 2019. Estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) was computed to assess the temporal change in ASDR and ASMR. RESULTS In 2019, the deaths and DALYs attributed to tobacco-related breast cancer were estimated to be 35,439 (95% UI: 22,179-48,119) and 1,060,590 (95% UI: 622,550-1,462,580), respectively. These figures accounted for 5.1% and 5.2% of the total burden of breast cancer. ASMR and ASDR increased in low SDI regions, remained stable in low-middle and middle SDI regions and declined in high and high-middle SDI regions. The burden of breast cancer attributable to tobacco varied notably among regions and nations. Oceania, Southern Latin America, and Central Europe were the GBD regions with the highest number of ASMR and DALYs. There was a positive relationship between age-standardized rate and SDI value in 2019 across 204 nations or territories. A negative association was observed between the EAPC in ASMR or ASDR and the human development index (HDI) in 2019 (R = -0.55, p < 0.01 for ASMR; R = -0.56, p < 0.01 for ASDR). CONCLUSION Tobacco is one important and modifiable risk factor for breast cancer. The heterogeneity in both the spatial and temporal distribution can be attributed to factors such as aging, population growth, and SDI. These findings substantiate the necessity of expediting the enforcement of tobacco-free legislation in order to safeguard populations from the detrimental effects of tobacco.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiusheng Guo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Yunyan Lu
- Department of Cardiology, The First People's Hospital of Xiaoshan District, Xiaoshan Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Weiguo Liu
- Department of Oncology, The People's Hospital of Jiangshan, Quzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Gaochen Lan
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
| | - Tian Lan
- Department of Breast Surgery, Hangzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kim J, Keegan TH. Characterizing risky alcohol use, cigarette smoking, e-cigarette use, and physical inactivity among cancer survivors in the USA-a cross-sectional study. J Cancer Surviv 2023; 17:1799-1812. [PMID: 35963976 PMCID: PMC10539414 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-022-01245-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Unhealthy lifestyle behaviors are associated with inferior health outcomes among cancer survivors, including increased mortality. It is crucial to identify vulnerable subgroups, yet investigations have been limited. Thus, this study aimed to examine sociodemographic and clinical characteristics associated with risky health behaviors among cancer survivors. METHODS We used national, cross-sectional survey data (Health Information National Trends Survey, HINTS 2017-2020) for 2579 cancer survivors. We calculated the prevalence of risky alcohol use, current cigarette smoking, e-cigarette use, and not meeting physical activity guidelines. We performed weighted logistic regression to obtain multivariable-adjusted odds ratios (OR) for the association between each unhealthy behavior with sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS Overall, 25% showed risky alcohol use, 12% were current cigarette smokers, 3% were current e-cigarette users, and 68% did not meet physical activity guidelines. Cancer survivors who were males, non-Hispanic Whites or African Americans, without a college education, not married and with comorbidities or psychological distress were more likely to have unhealthy behaviors. Those with lung disease or depression were 2 times as likely to smoke cigarette or e-cigarettes and those with psychological distress were 1.6 times as likely to be physically inactive. Moreover, risky drinkers (OR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.22-2.52) and e-cigarette smokers (OR = 16.40, 95% CI 3.29-81.89) were more likely to be current cigarette smokers. CONCLUSIONS We identified vulnerable subpopulations of cancer survivors with multiple unhealthy lifestyle behaviors. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Our findings inform clinicians and program and policy makers of the subgroups of cancer survivors to target for multiple health behavior interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiyeong Kim
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
| | - Theresa H Keegan
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, 4501 X Street, Suite 3016, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ergas IJ, Bradshaw PT, Feliciano EMC, Roh JM, Kwan ML, Laraia B, Madsen KA, Yao S, Thomsen C, Kushi LH. Hypothetical Interventions on Diet Quality and Lifestyle Factors to Improve Breast Cancer Survival: The Pathways Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023; 32:1716-1725. [PMID: 37721486 PMCID: PMC10841733 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-22-1216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of breast cancer survivors is increasing, yet evidence to inform dietary and lifestyle guidelines is limited. METHODS This analysis included 3,658 participants from the Pathways Study, a prospective cohort of women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer. A healthy plant-based dietary index score (hPDI), an American Cancer Society (ACS) nutrition guidelines score, a 2015 Healthy Eating Index score (HEI), hours per week of moderate to vigorous physical activity (PA), and lifetime cumulative pack-years of cigarette smoking (SM) were each measured at diagnosis, 6, 24, and 72 months. Using g-computation, 5- and 10-year risk ratios (RR), risk differences, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all-cause mortality under hypothetical interventions on diet quality, PA, and SM, compared with the natural course (no intervention) were calculated. RESULTS Hypothetical moderate to extreme interventions on hPDI, ACS, and HEI, each in combination with PA and SM, showed 11% to 56%, 9% to 38%, and 9% to 49% decreases in 5-year risks of all-cause mortality compared with no intervention, respectively [(hPDI: RRmoderate = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.82-0.94; RRextreme = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.26-0.67), (ACS: RRmoderate = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.85-0.96; RRextreme = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.43-0.82), (HEI: RRmoderate = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.84-0.95; RRextreme = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.33-0.72)]. While 10-year relative risks were slightly attenuated, absolute risk reductions were more pronounced. CONCLUSIONS Interventions to improve diet quality, increase PA, or reduce SM at the time of diagnosis may improve survival among breast cancer survivors. IMPACT We estimate that over 10% of deaths could be delayed by even moderate adoption of these behaviors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isaac J. Ergas
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612
- Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
| | - Patrick T. Bradshaw
- Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
| | | | - Janise M. Roh
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612
| | - Marilyn L. Kwan
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612
| | - Barbara Laraia
- Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
- Division of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
| | - Kristine A. Madsen
- Division of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
| | - Song Yao
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263
| | | | - Lawrence H. Kushi
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jeong S, Poudyal S, Klagges S, Kuhnt T, Papsdorf K, Hambsch P, Wach J, Güresir E, Nägler F, Rühle A, Nicolay NH, Seidel C. Diabetes Mellitus Is a Strong Independent Negative Prognostic Factor in Patients with Brain Metastases Treated with Radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4845. [PMID: 37835539 PMCID: PMC10571851 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15194845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain metastases (BM) cause relevant morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. The presence of cerebrovascular diseases can alter the tumor microenvironment, cellular proliferation and treatment resistance. However, it is largely unknown if the presence of distinct cerebrovascular risk factors may alter the prognosis of patients with BM. METHODS Patients admitted for the radiotherapy of BM at a large tertiary cancer center were included. Patient and survival data, including cerebrovascular risk factors (diabetes mellitus (DM), smoking, arterial hypertension, peripheral arterial occlusive disease, hypercholesterolemia and smoking) were recorded. RESULTS 203 patients were included. Patients with DM (n = 39) had significantly shorter overall survival (OS) (HR 1.75 (1.20-2.56), p = 0.003, log-rank). Other vascular comorbidities were not associated with differences in OS. DM remained prognostically significant in the multivariate Cox regression including established prognostic factors (HR 1.92 (1.20-3.06), p = 0.006). Furthermore, subgroup analyses revealed a prognostic role of DM in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, both in univariate (HR 1.68 (0.97-2.93), p = 0.066) and multivariate analysis (HR 2.73 (1.33-5.63), p = 0.006), and a trend in melanoma patients. CONCLUSION DM is associated with reduced survival in patients with BM. Further research is necessary to better understand the molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications of this important interaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seong Jeong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany (S.P.); (T.K.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (J.W.)
| | - Soniya Poudyal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany (S.P.); (T.K.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (J.W.)
| | | | - Thomas Kuhnt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany (S.P.); (T.K.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (J.W.)
| | - Kirsten Papsdorf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany (S.P.); (T.K.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (J.W.)
| | - Peter Hambsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany (S.P.); (T.K.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (J.W.)
| | - Johannes Wach
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (J.W.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Erdem Güresir
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (J.W.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Franziska Nägler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany (S.P.); (T.K.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (J.W.)
| | - Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany (S.P.); (T.K.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (J.W.)
| | - Nils H. Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany (S.P.); (T.K.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (J.W.)
| | - Clemens Seidel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany (S.P.); (T.K.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (J.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Al-Shami K, Awadi S, Khamees A, Alsheikh AM, Al-Sharif S, Ala’ Bereshy R, Al-Eitan SF, Banikhaled SH, Al-Qudimat AR, Al-Zoubi RM, Al Zoubi MS. Estrogens and the risk of breast cancer: A narrative review of literature. Heliyon 2023; 9:e20224. [PMID: 37809638 PMCID: PMC10559995 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
In female mammals, the development and regulation of the reproductive system and non-reproductive system are significantly influenced by estrogens (oestrogens). In addition, lipid metabolism is another physiological role of estrogens. Estrogens act through different types of receptors to introduce signals to the target cell by affecting many estrogen response elements. Breast cancer is considered mostly a hormone-dependent disease. Approximately 70% of breast cancers express progesterone receptors and/or estrogen receptors, and they are a good marker for cancer prognosis. This review will discuss estrogen metabolism and the interaction of estrogen metabolites with breast cancer. The carcinogenic role of estrogen is discussed in light of both conventional and atypical cancers susceptible to hormones, such as prostate, endometrial, and lung cancer, as we examine how estrogen contributes to the formation and activation of breast cancer. In addition, this review will discuss other factors that can be associated with estrogen-driven breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khayry Al-Shami
- Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, P.O Box 566, 21163, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Sajeda Awadi
- Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, P.O Box 566, 21163, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Almu'atasim Khamees
- Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, P.O Box 566, 21163, Irbid, Jordan
- Department of General Surgery, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, 11941, Jordan
| | | | - Sumaiya Al-Sharif
- Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, P.O Box 566, 21163, Irbid, Jordan
| | | | - Sharaf F. Al-Eitan
- Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, P.O Box 566, 21163, Irbid, Jordan
| | | | - Ahmad R. Al-Qudimat
- Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, QU-Health, Qatar University, Doha, 2713, Qatar
- Surgical Research Section, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Raed M. Al-Zoubi
- Surgical Research Section, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, QU-Health, Qatar University, Doha, 2713, Qatar
- Department of Chemistry, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O.Box 3030, Irbid, 22110, Jordan
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Li Z, Shen G, Shi M, Zheng Y, Guan Y, Xin Y, Wang M, Zhao F, Ren D, Zhao J. Association between high body mass index and prognosis of patients with early-stage breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Pathog Ther 2023; 1:205-215. [PMID: 38327841 PMCID: PMC10846319 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpt.2023.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Revised: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
Background A high body mass index (BMI) can indicate overweight or obesity and is a crucial risk factor for breast cancer survivors. However, the association between high BMI and prognosis in early-stage breast cancer (EBC) remains unclear. We aimed to assess the effects of high BMI on the prognosis of patients with EBC. Methods The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases and proceedings of major oncological conferences related to the effects of BMI on the prognosis of breast cancer were searched up to November 2021. Fixed- and random-effects models were used for meta-analyses. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were extracted from the included literature. Results Twenty retrospective cohort studies with 33,836 patients with EBC were included. Overweight patients had worse DFS (HR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.05-1.27, P = 0.002) and OS (HR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.09-1.33, P < 0.001). Obesity also had adverse effects on DFS (HR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.07-1.29, P = 0.001) and OS (HR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.17-1.45, P < 0.001). Likewise, patients with high BMI had worse DFS (HR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.08-1.26, P < 0.001) and OS (HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.14-1.39, P < 0.001). In subgroup analyses, overweight had adverse effects on DFS (HR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.04-1.18, P = 0.001) and OS (HR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.11-1.26, P < 0.001) in multivariate analyses, whereas the relationship that overweight had negative effects on DFS (HR: 1.21, 95% CI: 0.99-1.48, P = 0.058) and OS (HR: 1.39, 95% CI: 0.92-2.10, P = 0.123) was not statistically significant in univariate analysis. By contrast, obesity had adverse effects on DFS (HR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.06-1.38, P = 0.004 and HR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.08-1.22, P < 0.001) and OS (HR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.15-1.54, P < 0.001 and HR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.15-1.31, P < 0.001) in univariate and multivariate analyses, respectively. Conclusions Compared with normal weight, increased body weight (overweight, obesity, and high BMI) led to worse DFS and OS in patients with EBC. Once validated, these results should be considered in the development of prevention programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Yonghui Zheng
- Breast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Center of the Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University and the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai 810000, China
| | - Yumei Guan
- Breast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Center of the Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University and the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai 810000, China
| | - Yuanfang Xin
- Breast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Center of the Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University and the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai 810000, China
| | - Miaozhou Wang
- Breast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Center of the Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University and the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai 810000, China
| | - Fuxing Zhao
- Breast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Center of the Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University and the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai 810000, China
| | - Dengfeng Ren
- Breast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Center of the Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University and the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai 810000, China
| | - Jiuda Zhao
- Breast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Center of the Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University and the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai 810000, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Del Riccio M, Vettori V, Raimondi S, Lorini C, Masala G, Cattaruzza MS, Mazzarella L, Bonaccorsi G, Masiero M, Bendinelli B, Curigliano G, Pravettoni G, Pastore E, Gandini S, Caini S. The clinical impact of continued smoking in patients with breast and other hormone-dependent cancer: A systematic literature review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2023; 184:103951. [PMID: 36805551 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.103951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/20/2023] Open
Abstract
We conducted a systematic review of studies that investigated whether quitting smoking at or around diagnosis improves survival of patients with hormone-dependent cancers (HDC). Nine studies published in 2013-2022 were included. Studies were very diverse in terms of design, definition of quitters and continued smokers, and prevalence of prognostic factors other than smoking cessation (e.g. patients' demographics, tumour characteristic, and treatments). For breast, ovarian, and endometrial cancer, all included studies found that quitters had better overall, disease specific, and disease-free survival than continued smokers. For prostate cancer, there was no evidence of an association of smoking cessation with improved survival. This literature review provided suggestive evidence that female smokers diagnosed with cancer of the breast, ovary, or endometrium may improve their chances of surviving by stopping smoking. Smoking cessation counselling should become part of standard oncological care for these patients and integrated into breast cancer screening programs.
Collapse
|
12
|
Zeinomar N, Qin B, Amin S, Lin Y, Xu B, Chanumolu D, Omene CO, Pawlish KS, Demissie K, Ambrosone CB, Hong CC, Bandera EV. Association of Cigarette Smoking and Alcohol Consumption With Subsequent Mortality Among Black Breast Cancer Survivors in New Jersey. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2252371. [PMID: 36692882 PMCID: PMC10148653 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.52371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE There are limited data about how lifestyle factors are associated with breast cancer prognosis among Black or African American women because most of the evidence is based on studies of White breast cancer survivors. OBJECTIVE To examine the association of prediagnostic cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption with all-cause mortality and breast cancer-specific mortality in a cohort of Black breast cancer survivors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This population-based cohort study included 1926 Black or African American breast cancer survivors who received a diagnosis from June 6, 2005, to May 21, 2019, identified in 10 counties in New Jersey through rapid case ascertainment by the New Jersey State Cancer Registry. Statistical analysis was conducted from January 1, 2021, to August 1, 2022. EXPOSURES Information on prediagnostic cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and additional covariates was collected during in-person interviews. The covariates examined included smoking status at the time of breast cancer diagnosis (currently smoking at the time of breast cancer diagnosis, formerly smoking, or never smoking), smoking duration (number of years smoking), smoking intensity (cigarettes smoked per day), number of pack-years of smoking, and regular alcohol consumption the year before diagnosis (categorized as nondrinkers, ≤3 drinks per week, or >3 drinks per week). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcomes included breast cancer-specific mortality and all-cause mortality. RESULTS Among the 1926 women in the study, the mean (SD) age at breast cancer diagnosis was 54.4 (10.8) years. During 13 464 person-years of follow-up (median follow-up, 6.7 years [range, 0.5-16.0 years]), there were 337 deaths, of which 187 (55.5%) were breast cancer related. Compared with never smokers, current smokers at the time of breast cancer diagnosis had a 52% increased risk for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.52; 95% CI, 1.15-2.02), which was most pronounced for those with 10 or more pack-years of smoking (HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.34-2.53). Similar findings were observed for breast cancer-specific mortality (current smokers vs never smokers: HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.87-1.85), although they were not statistically significant. There was no statistically significant association between alcohol consumption and all-cause mortality (>3 drinks per week vs nondrinkers: HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.73-1.51) or breast cancer-specific mortality (>3 drinks per week vs nondrinkers: HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.67-1.67). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This population-based cohort study of Black breast cancer survivors suggests that current smoking at the time of diagnosis was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality, particularly among women with greater pack-years of smoking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nur Zeinomar
- Cancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Bo Qin
- Cancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Saber Amin
- Cancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick
| | - Yong Lin
- Cancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey
| | - Baichen Xu
- Cancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick
| | - Dhanya Chanumolu
- Cancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick
| | - Coral O Omene
- Cancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Karen S Pawlish
- Cancer Epidemiology Services, New Jersey State Cancer Registry, New Jersey Department of Health, Trenton
| | - Kitaw Demissie
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, SUNY Downstate School of Public Health, Brooklyn, New York
| | - Christine B Ambrosone
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Chi-Chen Hong
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Elisa V Bandera
- Cancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Song HN, Kim JY, Kim JM, Kang KM, Choi HS, Jeong JH, Ha IB, Jeong BK. Sarcopenia using pectoralis muscle area and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) are independent prognostic factors in patients for nonmetastatic breast cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e32229. [PMID: 36626455 PMCID: PMC9750599 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000032229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Sarcopenia is defined as loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength. This can lead to adverse clinical outcomes in patients with advanced cancer. The lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), a converted inflammatory response, is associated with poor prognosis in patients with malignancies. Herein, we examined the prognostic influence of sarcopenia status assessed by pectoralis muscle area (PMA), inflammatory status calculated by LMR, and its association with disease-free survival (DFS) in a cohort of women diagnosed with nonmetastatic breast cancer. A total of 293 patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer who underwent primary mass resection and radiotherapy between January 2011 and December 2017 were enrolled. The cross-sectional area of the muscle (cm2) at PMA was measured using computed tomography before radiation therapy. Baseline monocyte and lymphocyte counts were obtained from the complete blood count to calculate the LMR. Most of the patients (248/293, 84.6%) underwent breast conservation surgery. Lymph node involvement at diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR], 5.08; P < .001), low LMR (HR, 2.79; P = .007), and low PMA (HR, 3.80; P < .001) were independent poor prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. The mean DFS of sarcopenic and nonsarcopenic patients was 89.8 months and 118.8 months, respectively (P < .001). Sarcopenic patients with low LMR showed the worst outcomes, whereas nonsarcopenic patients with high LMR showed the best outcomes. Low PMA and low LMR were independent poor prognostic factors for DFS in patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haa-Na Song
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Korea
- Institute of Health Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea
| | - Ju Yeon Kim
- Institute of Health Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Korea
| | - Jae Myung Kim
- Institute of Health Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Korea
| | - Ki Mun Kang
- Institute of Health Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Gyeongsang National University of Medicine, Changwon, Korea
| | - Hoon Sik Choi
- Institute of Health Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Gyeongsang National University of Medicine, Changwon, Korea
| | - Jin Hee Jeong
- Institute of Health Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Korea
| | - In Bong Ha
- Institute of Health Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gyeongsang National University of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Korea
| | - Bae-Kwon Jeong
- Institute of Health Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gyeongsang National University of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Korea
- * Correspondence: Bae-Kwon Jeong, Department of Radiation Oncology, Gyeongsang National University of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Hospital, 79 Gangnam-ro, Jinju, Gyeongsangnam-do 52727, Korea (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
An D, Choi J, Lee J, Kim JY, Kwon S, Kim J, Lee S, Jeon S, Lee C, Lee S, Woo H. Time to surgery and survival in breast cancer. BMC Surg 2022; 22:388. [PMID: 36369022 PMCID: PMC9652796 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01835-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed to investigate the effect of the time from diagnosis to breast cancer surgery on breast cancer patients’ prognosis.
Methods Of the 1900 patients diagnosed with invasive (stage 1–3) breast cancer who underwent surgery in KUH between 2012 and 2019, 279 patients were enrolled in this study. All patients, including those who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, were classified as Model 1 subjects, and those who received immediate surgical treatment were classified as Model 2 subjects. We conducted a Cox regression analysis to identify prognostic factors of breast cancer associated with the time from diagnosis to surgery. Results The univariate results indicated a sharp drop in both groups’ survival rates when the time to surgery was delayed for more than 8 weeks (Model 1 p = 0.000; Model 2 p = 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the hazard ratio (HR) of Model 1increased (HR = 6.84, 95% CI 1.06–44.25) in response to a delay in surgery of more than 8 weeks. Smoking and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system had a negative effect on breast cancer prognosis, while hormone therapy had a positive effect. Conclusion For all patients, a delay in breast cancer surgery of more than 8 weeks was inversely associated with survival.
Collapse
|
15
|
Hoch JS, Barr HK, Guggenbickler AM, Dewa CS. Lessons from Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Smoking Cessation Programs for Cancer Patients. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:6982-6991. [PMID: 36290826 PMCID: PMC9600008 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29100549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Smoking among patients diagnosed with cancer poses important health and financial challenges including reduced effectiveness of expensive cancer therapies. This study explores the value of smoking cessation programs (SCPs) for patients already diagnosed with cancer. It also identifies conditions under which SPCs may be wise investments. METHODS Using a simplified decision analytic model combined with insights from a literature review, we explored the cost-effectiveness of SCPs. RESULTS The findings provide insights about the potential impact of cessation probabilities among cancer patients in SCPs and the potential impact of SCPs on cancer patients' lives. CONCLUSION The evidence suggests that there is good reason to believe that SCPs are an economically attractive way to improve outcomes for cancer patients when SCPs are offered in conjunction with standard cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey S. Hoch
- Division of Health Policy and Management, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
- Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, Sacramento, CA 95820, USA
- Correspondence:
| | - Heather K. Barr
- Graduate Group in Public Health Sciences, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
| | - Andrea M. Guggenbickler
- Graduate Group in Public Health Sciences, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
| | - Carolyn S. Dewa
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lai YC, Chen YH, Wu YC, Liang FW, Wang JJ, Lim SW, Ho CH. The Association between Smoking and Mortality in Women with Breast Cancer: A Real-World Database Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14194565. [PMID: 36230488 PMCID: PMC9558950 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14194565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Smoking increases the cancer-specific and overall mortality risk in women with breast cancer (BC). However, the effect of smoking cessation remains controversial, and detailed research is lacking in Asia. We aimed to investigate the association between smoking status and mortality in women with BC using the population-based cancer registry. The Taiwan Cancer Registry was used to identify women with BC from 2011 to 2017. A total of 54,614 women with BC were enrolled, including 1687 smokers and 52,927 non-smokers. The outcome, mortality, was identified using Taiwan’s cause-of-death database. The association between smoking status and mortality was estimated using Cox proportional regression. Women with BC who smoked had a 1.25-fold higher (95% C.I.: 1.08–1.45; p = 0.0022) risk of overall mortality and a 1.22-fold higher (95% C.I.: 1.04–1.44; p = 0.0168) risk of cancer-specific mortality compared with non-smokers. The stratified analysis also indicated that women with BC who smoked showed a significantly higher overall mortality risk (HR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.01–1.43; p = 0.0408) than women with BC who did not smoke among women without comorbidities. Additionally, current smokers had a 1.57-fold higher risk (95% CI: 1.02–2.42; p = 0.0407) of overall mortality compared with ever smokers among women with BC who smoked. It was shown that a current smoking status is significantly associated with an increase in overall and cancer-specific mortality risk in women with BC. Quitting smoking could reduce one’s mortality risk. Our results underscore the importance of smoking cessation for women with BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Chen Lai
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Tainan Municipal AN-NAN Hospital-China Medical University, Tainan City 70965, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Han Chen
- Department of Family Medicine, Tainan Municipal AN-NAN Hospital-China Medical University, Tainan City 70965, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Cih Wu
- Department of Medical Research, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan 71004, Taiwan
| | - Fu-Wen Liang
- Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Research, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan
| | - Jhi-Joung Wang
- Department of Medical Research, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan 71004, Taiwan
| | - Sher-Wei Lim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Chiali, Tainan 722, Taiwan
- Department of Nursing, Min-Hwei College of Health Care Management, Tainan 73658, Taiwan
- Correspondence: (S.-W.L.); (C.-H.H.)
| | - Chung-Han Ho
- Department of Medical Research, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan 71004, Taiwan
- Department of Information Management, Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Tainan 71005, Taiwan
- Cancer Center, Taipei Municipal Wanfang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11696, Taiwan
- Correspondence: (S.-W.L.); (C.-H.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Di Sotto A, Gullì M, Minacori M, Mancinelli R, Garzoli S, Percaccio E, Incocciati A, Romaniello D, Mazzanti G, Eufemi M, Di Giacomo S. β-Caryophyllene Counteracts Chemoresistance Induced by Cigarette Smoke in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer MDA-MB-468 Cells. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10092257. [PMID: 36140359 PMCID: PMC9496176 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10092257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 09/03/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Exposure to cigarette smoke (CS) has been associated with an increased risk of fatal breast cancers and recurrence, along with chemoresistance and chemotherapy impairment. This strengthens the interest in chemopreventive agents to be exploited both in healthy and oncological subjects to prevent or repair CS damage. In the present study, we evaluated the chemopreventive properties of the natural sesquiterpene β-caryophyllene towards the damage induced by cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) in triple negative breast cancer MDA-MB-468 cells. Particularly, we assessed the ability of the sesquiterpene to interfere with the mechanisms exploited by CSC to promote cell survival and chemoresistance, including genomic instability, cell cycle progress, autophagy/apoptosis, cell migration and related pathways. β-Caryophyllene was found to be able to increase the CSC-induced death of MDA-MB-468 cells, likely triggering oxidative stress, cell cycle arrest and apoptosis; moreover, it hindered cell recovery, autophagy activation and cell migration; at last, a marked inhibition of the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) activation was highlighted: this could represent a key mechanism of the chemoprevention by β-caryophyllene. Although further studies are required to confirm the in vivo efficacy of β-caryophyllene, the present results suggest a novel strategy to reduce the harmful effect of smoke in cancer patients and to improve the survival expectations in breast cancer women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonella Di Sotto
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology “V. Erspamer”, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
- Correspondence: (A.D.S.); (G.M.)
| | - Marco Gullì
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology “V. Erspamer”, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Minacori
- Department of Biochemical Science “A. Rossi Fanelli”, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Romina Mancinelli
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Stefania Garzoli
- Department of Chemistry and Technology of Drugs, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Ester Percaccio
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology “V. Erspamer”, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Alessio Incocciati
- Department of Biochemical Science “A. Rossi Fanelli”, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Donatella Romaniello
- Department of Biochemical Science “A. Rossi Fanelli”, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Gabriela Mazzanti
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology “V. Erspamer”, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
- Correspondence: (A.D.S.); (G.M.)
| | - Margherita Eufemi
- Department of Biochemical Science “A. Rossi Fanelli”, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Di Giacomo
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology “V. Erspamer”, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Grandal B, Aljehani A, Dumas E, Daoud E, Jochum F, Gougis P, Hotton J, Lemoine A, Michel S, Laas E, Laé M, Pierga JY, Alaoui Ismaili K, Lerebours F, Reyal F, Hamy AS. No Impact of Seasonality of Diagnoses on Baseline Tumor Immune Infiltration, Response to Treatment, and Prognosis in BC Patients Treated with NAC. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14133080. [PMID: 35804852 PMCID: PMC9264787 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Revised: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary High tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) levels are associated with an increased response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer (BC). The seasonal fluctuation of TILs in breast cancer is poorly documented. In this study, we compared pre- and post-treatment immune infiltration, the treatment response as assessed by means of pathological complete response (pCR) rates, and survival according to the seasonality of BC diagnoses in a clinical cohort of patients treated with NAC. We found no association between seasonality and baseline TIL levels or pCR rates. We found that post-NAC stromal lymphocyte infiltration was lower when cancer was diagnosed in the summer, especially in the subgroup of patients with TNBC. Our data do not support the hypothesis that the seasonality of diagnoses has a major impact on the natural history of BC treated with NAC. Abstract Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women worldwide. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) makes it possible to monitor in vivo response to treatment. Several studies have investigated the impact of the seasons on the incidence and detection of BC, on tumor composition, and on the prognosis of BC. However, no evidence is available on their association with immune infiltration and the response to treatment. The objective of this study was to analyze pre- and post-NAC immune infiltration as assessed by TIL levels, the response to treatment as assessed by pathological complete response (pCR) rates, and oncological outcomes as assessed by relapse-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS) according to the seasonality of BC diagnoses in a clinical cohort of patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Out of 1199 patients, the repartition of the season at BC diagnosis showed that 27.2% were diagnosed in fall, 25.4% in winter, 24% in spring, and 23.4% in summer. Baseline patient and tumor characteristics, including notable pre-NAC TIL levels, were not significantly different in terms of the season of BC diagnosis. Similarly, the pCR rates were not different. No association for oncological outcome was identified. Our data do not support the idea that the seasonality of diagnoses has a major impact on the natural history of BC treated with NAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatriz Grandal
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, University Paris, 75005 Paris, France; (B.G.); (E.D.); (E.D.); (F.J.); (P.G.); (S.M.); (E.L.); (A.S.H.)
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, University Paris, 75005 Paris, France;
| | - Ashwaq Aljehani
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, University Paris, 75005 Paris, France;
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11564, Saudi Arabia
| | - Elise Dumas
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, University Paris, 75005 Paris, France; (B.G.); (E.D.); (E.D.); (F.J.); (P.G.); (S.M.); (E.L.); (A.S.H.)
| | - Eric Daoud
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, University Paris, 75005 Paris, France; (B.G.); (E.D.); (E.D.); (F.J.); (P.G.); (S.M.); (E.L.); (A.S.H.)
| | - Floriane Jochum
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, University Paris, 75005 Paris, France; (B.G.); (E.D.); (E.D.); (F.J.); (P.G.); (S.M.); (E.L.); (A.S.H.)
| | - Paul Gougis
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, University Paris, 75005 Paris, France; (B.G.); (E.D.); (E.D.); (F.J.); (P.G.); (S.M.); (E.L.); (A.S.H.)
| | - Judicaël Hotton
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Godinot, Université de Lorraine, 51100 Reims, France;
| | - Amélie Lemoine
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Godinot, Université de Lorraine, 51100 Reims, France;
| | - Sophie Michel
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, University Paris, 75005 Paris, France; (B.G.); (E.D.); (E.D.); (F.J.); (P.G.); (S.M.); (E.L.); (A.S.H.)
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, University Paris, 75005 Paris, France;
| | - Enora Laas
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, University Paris, 75005 Paris, France; (B.G.); (E.D.); (E.D.); (F.J.); (P.G.); (S.M.); (E.L.); (A.S.H.)
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, University Paris, 75005 Paris, France;
| | - Marick Laé
- Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Department of Pathology, INSERM U1245, UniRouen Normandy University, 76130 Rouen, France;
- Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, University Paris, 75231 Paris, France
| | - Jean-Yves Pierga
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, University Paris, 75231 Paris, France; (J.-Y.P.); (K.A.I.); (F.L.)
| | - Khaoula Alaoui Ismaili
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, University Paris, 75231 Paris, France; (J.-Y.P.); (K.A.I.); (F.L.)
| | - Florence Lerebours
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, University Paris, 75231 Paris, France; (J.-Y.P.); (K.A.I.); (F.L.)
| | - Fabien Reyal
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, University Paris, 75005 Paris, France; (B.G.); (E.D.); (E.D.); (F.J.); (P.G.); (S.M.); (E.L.); (A.S.H.)
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, University Paris, 75005 Paris, France;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-144-324-660 or +33-615-271-980
| | - Anne Sophie Hamy
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, University Paris, 75005 Paris, France; (B.G.); (E.D.); (E.D.); (F.J.); (P.G.); (S.M.); (E.L.); (A.S.H.)
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, University Paris, 75005 Paris, France;
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, University Paris, 75231 Paris, France; (J.-Y.P.); (K.A.I.); (F.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kimpe E, Werbrouck A, De Ridder M, Putman K. Quantifying Societal Burden of Radiation-Induced Cardiovascular Events in Breast Cancer Survivors. Front Oncol 2022; 12:869529. [PMID: 35494083 PMCID: PMC9039176 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.869529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose Radiation-induced cardiotoxicity is an important health concern for clinicians during treatment of breast cancer (BC) patients. Underlying mechanisms are well-documented, whereas little is known about the societal impact of this long-term effect. This study aimed to quantify the additional burden of radiation-induced cardiovascular (CV) diseases in BC survivors. Materials and Methods Conventional health economic modelling techniques were applied to estimate attributed CV-related costs and disutility in a hypothetical cohort of BC survivors. A situation in which radiotherapy caused an additional CV risk was compared with a situation in which this risk was not taken into account. Uncertainty was assessed via deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Analyses were performed from a broad societal perspective up until 20 years after BC treatment. Results Radiation-induced cardiotoxicity evokes a mean incremental cost of €275.10 per woman over a time horizon of 20 years after BC treatment. An additional decrement of 0.017 QALYs (per woman) might be expected when taking the radiation-induced cardiotoxic risk into account in BC survivors. Incremental costs and disutility increased with age. A scenario analysis showed that these results were more profound in women with more advanced staging. Conclusion Our analyses suggest that with current radiation techniques, rather minor costs and disutility are to be expected from radiation-induced cardiotoxicity in BC survivors. The cost of past investments in order to achieve current mean heart dose (MHD) seems justified when considering the gains from cost and disutility reduction resulting from radiation-induced cardiovascular events. The question we might consider is whether future opportunity costs associated with investments on further technological advancements offset the expected marginal benefit from further reducing the MHD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Kimpe
- Interuniversity Centre for Health Economics Research (I-CHER), Department of Public Health, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Amber Werbrouck
- Interuniversity Centre for Health Economics Research (I-CHER), Department of Public Health, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mark De Ridder
- Department of Radiotherapy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Koen Putman
- Interuniversity Centre for Health Economics Research (I-CHER), Department of Public Health, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Radiotherapy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Di Meglio A, Havas J, Gbenou AS, Martin E, El-Mouhebb M, Pistilli B, Menvielle G, Dumas A, Everhard S, Martin AL, Cottu PH, Lerebours F, Coutant C, Lesur A, Tredan O, Soulie P, Vanlemmens L, Joly F, Delaloge S, Ganz PA, André F, Partridge AH, Jones LW, Michiels S, Vaz-Luis I. Dynamics of Long-Term Patient-Reported Quality of Life and Health Behaviors After Adjuvant Breast Cancer Chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:3190-3204. [PMID: 35446677 PMCID: PMC9509127 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.00277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
We aimed to characterize long-term quality of life (QOL) trajectories among patients with breast cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and to identify related patterns of health behaviors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Di Meglio
- Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,INSERM Unit 981, Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Julie Havas
- INSERM Unit 981, Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Arnauld S Gbenou
- INSERM Unit 981, Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Elise Martin
- INSERM Unit 981, Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Mayssam El-Mouhebb
- INSERM Unit 981, Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Barbara Pistilli
- INSERM Unit 981, Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Agnes Dumas
- Université de Paris, ECEVE UMR 1123, INSERM, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Anne Lesur
- Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Fabrice André
- Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,INSERM Unit 981, Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Lee W Jones
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Stefan Michiels
- Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Oncostat Inserm U1018, Université Paris- Saclay, Equipe labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Ines Vaz-Luis
- Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,INSERM Unit 981, Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Tenti MV, Ingrosso G, Bini V, Mariucci C, Saldi S, Alì E, Zucchetti C, Bellavita R, Aristei C. Tomotherapy-based moderate hypofractionation for localized prostate cancer: a mono-institutional analysis. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2022; 27:142-151. [PMID: 35402018 PMCID: PMC8989459 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2022.0012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To date, few studies have been published on image-guided helical tomotherapy (HT) in a moderate hypofractionation of localized PCa. We report outcome and toxicity of localized PCa patients treated with HT-based moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy. Materials and methods 76 patients were retrospectively analyzed. A total dose of 60 Gy (20 × 3 Gy) or 67.5 Gy (25 × 2.7 Gy) was prescribed. The χ2 test was used to analyze associations between toxicity and dosimetric and clinical parameters. The Cox proportional hazard regression model was used for multivariate analysis. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Results median follow-up was 42.26 months [interquartile (IQR), 23-76). At 4-year, overall survival (OS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) were 91% and 89%, respectively. At multivariate analysis, smoking habitude was associated with MFS [hazard ratio (HR) 7.32, 95% CI: 1.57-34.16, p = 0.011]. Acute and late grade ≥ 2 gastro-intestinal (GI) toxicity was observed in 6.5% and 2.6% of patients, respectively. Acute and late grade ≥ 2 genito-urinary (GU) toxicity were 31.5% and 3.9%. Four-year late GI and GU grade ≥ 2 toxicity were 3% and 7%, respectively. Acute GI toxicity was associated with statins medication (p = 0.04) and androgen deprivation therapy (p = 0.013). Acute GU toxicity was associated with the use of anticoagulants (p = 0.029) and antiaggregants (p = 0.013). Conclusions HT-based moderate hypofractionation shows very low rates of toxicity. Smoking habitude is associated with the risk of developing metastases after radical treatment for localized PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Valentina Tenti
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Italy
| | - Gianluca Ingrosso
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Italy
| | - Vittorio Bini
- Internal Medicine, Endocrine and Metabolic Science Section, University of Perugia, Italy
| | - Cristina Mariucci
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy
| | - Simonetta Saldi
- Radiation Oncology Section, Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Emanuele Alì
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Italy
| | - Claudio Zucchetti
- Section of Medical Physics, Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Rita Bellavita
- Radiation Oncology Section, Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Darmon S, Park A, Lovejoy LA, Shriver CD, Zhu K, Ellsworth RE. Relationship between Cigarette Smoking and Cancer Characteristics and Survival among Breast Cancer Patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19:4084. [PMID: 35409765 PMCID: PMC8997894 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19074084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Carcinogenic effects of tobacco smoke may affect breast tumorigenesis. To assess whether cigarette smoking is associated with breast cancer characteristics, we investigated the relationships between smoking, pathological characteristics, and outcomes in 2153 women diagnosed with breast cancer 2001-2016. Patients were classified as never, former, or current smokers at the time of diagnosis. Logistic regression and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis were performed to determine whether smoking was associated with tumor characteristics. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis was conducted to compare former or current smokers to never smokers in survival with adjustment for the potential confounders. The majority of women (61.8%) never smoked, followed by former smokers (26.2%) and current smokers (12.0%). After adjustment for demographic variables, body mass index, and comorbidities, tumor characteristics were not significantly associated with smoking status or pack-years smoked. Ten-year overall survival was significantly lower for former and current smokers compared to never smokers (p = 0.0105). However, breast cancer specific survival did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.1606). Although cigarette smoking did not alter the underlying biology of breast tumors or breast cancer-specific survival, overall survival was significantly worse in smokers, highlighting the importance of smoking cessation in the recently diagnosed breast cancer patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Darmon
- Murtha Cancer Center/Research Program, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA; (S.D.); (A.P.); (C.D.S.); (K.Z.)
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD 20817, USA
| | - Amie Park
- Murtha Cancer Center/Research Program, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA; (S.D.); (A.P.); (C.D.S.); (K.Z.)
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD 20817, USA
| | - Leann A. Lovejoy
- Chan Soon-Shiong Institute of Molecular Medicine at Windber, Windber, PA 15963, USA;
| | - Craig D. Shriver
- Murtha Cancer Center/Research Program, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA; (S.D.); (A.P.); (C.D.S.); (K.Z.)
- Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
| | - Kangmin Zhu
- Murtha Cancer Center/Research Program, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA; (S.D.); (A.P.); (C.D.S.); (K.Z.)
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD 20817, USA
- Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
- Department of Preventative Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
| | - Rachel E. Ellsworth
- Murtha Cancer Center/Research Program, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA; (S.D.); (A.P.); (C.D.S.); (K.Z.)
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD 20817, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Singareeka Raghavendra A, Kypriotakis G, Karam-hage M, Kim S, Jizzini M, Seoudy KS, Robinson JD, Barcenas CH, Cinciripini PM, Tripathy D, Ibrahim NK. The Impact of Treatment for Smoking on Breast Cancer Patients’ Survival. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:1464. [PMID: 35326615 PMCID: PMC8946483 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary This was a retrospective analysis of breast cancer patients who were self-identified as smokers at diagnosis and who were invited to participate in a comprehensive tobacco treatment program (TP) that provided pharmacotherapy and motivational counseling to quit smoking. Our study shows that quitting smoking is associated with improved survival among breast cancer patients who smoke across all tumor stages. In our survival analysis, tobacco abstainers were more likely than smokers to be alive with no evidence of disease (hazard ratio = 0.616 95%CI (0.402–0.945), p = 0.026). Comprehensive approach to address smoking cessation may prolong survival outcomes when started as early as the time of diagnosis. Abstract Background: Smoking negatively affects overall survival after successful breast cancer (BC) treatment. We hypothesized that smoking cessation would improve survival outcomes of BC patients who were smokers at the time of diagnosis. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of self-identified smokers with BC treated at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Patient demographics, date of diagnosis, tumor stage, tobacco treatment program (TP) participation, and time to death were extracted from our departmental databases and institutional electronic health records. We examined associations between tobacco abstinence status and survival using survival models, with and without interactions, adjusted for personal characteristics and biomarkers of disease. Results: Among all 31,069 BC patients treated at MD Anderson between 2006 and 2017, we identified 2126 smokers (6.8%). From those 2126 self-identified smokers, 665 participated in the TP, reporting a conservative estimate of 31% abstinence (intent-to-treat) 9 months into the program. Patients without reported follow-up abstinence status (including TP and non-TP participants) were handled in the analyses as smokers. Survival analysis controlled for multiple factors, including disease characteristics and participation in the TP, indicated that abstainers were more likely to be alive with no evidence of disease compared to non-abstainers (HR, 0.593; 95% CI, 0.386–0.911; p = 0.017). Conclusion: Our results suggest that quitting smoking is associated with improved survival among BC patients who were smokers at time of diagnosis across all tumor stages. Comprehensive approaches for smoking cessation in patients diagnosed with BC may prolong survival when started as early as the time of diagnosis.
Collapse
|
24
|
Young AL, Rankin NM, Whippy E, Cooke S, Milross C, Zielinski R, Brennan H, Grand M, Beale P. Implementation and evaluation of a smoking cessation checklist implemented within Australian cancer services. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2022; 18:e469-e478. [PMID: 35238146 PMCID: PMC9543157 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Introduction The detrimental impact of smoking tobacco can be mitigated when cancer patients quit smoking. Smoking cessation clinical pathways are inconsistently implemented within Australian cancer services. The aim of this study was to pilot test and evaluate the reach, adoption, and implementation of a smoking cessation checklist within oncology services. Methods The checklist was implemented over a 6‐month period in medical and radiation oncology services at two metropolitan and one rural hospital. The RE‐AIM framework guided the evaluation process. Implementation strategies included training, process mapping, and identifying champions. Evaluation measures included a clinical data audit, surveys, and semi‐structured interviews with healthcare professionals (HCPs). Results Healthcare professionals (HCPs; N = 63; 41% oncologists, 32% nurses, 27% others) completed 1276 checklists with cancer patients between November 2019 and December 2020. Of the 126 (10%) identified current smokers, 34 (27%) accepted a referral to either Quitline, Nicotine Replacement Therapy, to a general practitioner or dedicated HCP for follow‐up telephone support. There was variation in screening adoption by HCPs across the three hospitals, with 16%, 92% and 89.5% of patients screened respectively. Contextual factors, such as perceived commitment, role identity, and communication processes appeared to influence the outcomes. Conclusion A checklist is a simple, effective, and versatile intervention used to standardise smoking cessation practices in medical and radiation oncology services. The checklist supports standardisation of referral practices to smoking cessation services for cancer patients by either oncologist and/or nurses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Luk Young
- Sydney Catalyst Translational Research Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicole M Rankin
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Elena Whippy
- Concord Cancer Centre, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Skye Cooke
- Concord Cancer Centre, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chris Milross
- Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robert Zielinski
- Medical Oncology, Orange Hospital, Orange, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hayley Brennan
- Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Melissa Grand
- Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Philip Beale
- Sydney Catalyst Translational Research Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,Concord Cancer Centre, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kateryna T, Monika L, Beata J, Joanna R, Edyta R, Marcin B, Agnieszka KW, Ewa J. Cadmium and breast cancer – current state and research gaps in the underlying mechanisms. Toxicol Lett 2022; 361:29-42. [DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2022.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
|
26
|
Hu Y, Zong G, Sun Q, Giovannucci E, Song M. Weight Gain After Smoking Cessation and Cancer Risk in 3 Prospective Cohorts in the United States. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2022; 6:6515612. [PMID: 35699498 PMCID: PMC8882388 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkac005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Revised: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background It remains unknown how cancer risks vary by duration of smoking cessation and whether the benefit is attenuated by postcessation weight gain. Methods We prospectively followed 198 565 persons from the Nurses’ Health Study (1978-2016), Nurses’ Health Study II (1991-2017), and Health Professionals Follow-up Study (1988-2016) who were free of cancer at baseline. We used proportional hazard Cox models to compare cancer risk between current smokers and former smokers with different durations of smoking cessation and postcessation weight gains. Results During 4 718 199 person-years of follow-up, we identified 32 456 cases of total cancer. Compared with current smokers, the risks for total and smoking-related cancer in past smokers were reduced to the level similar to never smokers after abstaining smoking for more than 26 years, with the hazard ratio of 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.63 to 0.76) for total cancer and 0.31 (95% CI = 0.26 to 0.37) for smoking-related cancer, whereas no risk reduction was found for obesity-related cancer. Comparing former smokers with current smokers, the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios for postcessation weight gain of 0-4.9 kg, 5-9.9 kg, and 10 kg or higher were 0.85 (95% CI = 0.81 to 0.89), 0.88 (95% CI = 0.83 to 0.93), and 0.93 (95% CI = 0.88 to 1.00) for total cancer and 0.62 (95% CI = 0.58 to 0.67), 0.65 (95% CI = 0.60 to 0.71), and 0.71 (95% CI = 0.65 to 0.78) for total smoking-related cancer. In contrast, higher weight gain following smoking cessation was associated with a modest increased obesity-related cancer risk. Conclusion Smoking cessation overall has a strong net association with lower risk of total cancer irrespective of weight gain. However, this inverse association may be attenuated by substantial postcessation weight gain, largely because of an increased risk of obesity-related cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Hu
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Geng Zong
- CAS Key Laboratory of Nutrition, Metabolism and Food Safety, Institute of Nutrition and Health, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China
| | - Qi Sun
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Edward Giovannucci
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mingyang Song
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Corn BW, Feldman DB, Hull JG, O'Rourke MA, Bakitas MA. Dispositional hope as a potential outcome parameter among patients with advanced malignancy: An analysis of the ENABLE database. Cancer 2022; 128:401-409. [PMID: 34613617 PMCID: PMC10008020 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 07/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hopefulness, whether inherently present (dispositional hope) or augmented (by enhancement techniques), may affect outcomes. This study was performed to determine the association of dispositional hope with survival among patients diagnosed with advanced cancer. METHODS Data from ENABLE (Educate, Nurture, Advise, Before Life Ends), a palliative care intervention, were reanalyzed to determine the association of higher dispositional hope and patient survival. This was a secondary analysis of data combined from the ENABLE II and ENABLE III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with respect to dispositional hope and survival. A dispositional hope index was created from 3 hope items from 2 validated baseline questionnaires. Dispositional hope and survival data were collected during the 2 RCTs. In ENABLE II, participants were randomly assigned to the ENABLE intervention or to usual care. In ENABLE III, participants were randomly assigned to receive the intervention immediately or 12 weeks after enrollment. RESULTS In all, 529 persons were included in Cox proportional hazards regression analyses to model the effects of dispositional hope on survival. An initial analysis without covariates yielded a significant effect of hope (Wald statistic, 8.649; hazard ratio, 0.941; confidence interval, 0.904-0.980; P = .003), such that higher dispositional hope was associated with longer survival. In a subsequent analysis that included all covariates, the effect of dispositional hope approached statistical significance (Wald statistic, 2.96; hazard ratio, 0.933; confidence interval, 0.863-1.010; P = .085). CONCLUSIONS Higher levels of dispositional hope were associated with longer survival in patients with advanced cancer. Prospective trials are needed to determine the effects of dispositional and augmented hope on the outcomes of patients with advanced cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin W Corn
- Department of Oncology, Shaare Zedek Cancer Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - David B Feldman
- Department of Counseling Psychology, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, California
| | - Jay G Hull
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - Mark A O'Rourke
- Prisma Health Upstate Cancer Institute, Greenville, South Carolina
| | - Marie A Bakitas
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.,Center for Palliative and Supportive Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Barrault-Couchouron M, Béracochéa M, Dorval M, Allafort V, Barthélémy V, Garguil V, Auriacombe M, Bussières E, M'bailara K. [Tobacco and alcohol consumption in women treated for breast cancer in a department of surgical oncology: Frequent behaviours to consider]. Bull Cancer 2021:S0007-4551(21)00364-7. [PMID: 34756596 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2021.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2019] [Revised: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Tobacco and alcohol represent the two most important risk factors increasing cancer incidence and mortality, particularly among women with breast cancer. However, few researches have focused on the consumption of psychoactive substances in women treated for breast cancer. The present study describes the prevalence of tobacco and alcohol consumption and their relationships with the sociodemographic, medical and psychological variables in a population of women receiving surgery treatment for breast cancer. METHODS Between October 2014 and August 2015, a group of women receiving breast cancer treatment were recruited to participate to a screening and brief intervention program (SBI) for the consumption of tobacco and alcohol, adapted to the oncology context. Data on tobacco and alcohol consumption were collected using two questionnaires : the smoking status identification (NIDA) and alcohol consumption (AUDIT-C). A questionnaire for socio- demographic data and two for psychological data (Thermometer of psychological distress; ESAS), have been used. The medical data were reported by participants and verified on medical records. RESULTS In a total of 11 months, 120 women with breast cancer were included in this study. A large majority of patients were hospitalized for a first-time cancer (80.8%), type invasive ductal carcinoma (70.8%) and were receiving surgery as primary treatment (45%). Furthermore, 30.8% of the women reported tobacco consumption and 38.4% high-risk alcohol consumption. Regarding mental health, 40.8% presented moderate to intense levels of psychological distress. No significant relationships were found between consumption scores and sociodemographic, medical or psychological characteristics. Only the patient's age was negatively associated with tobacco consumption. DISCUSSION Tobacco and at-risk alcohol consumption are frequently reported behaviors during breast cancer treatment. Intervention strategies targeting risk behaviors related to addictive consumption should be implemented during the full treatment of breast cancer patients.
Collapse
|
29
|
Kim DY, Park MS, Youn JC, Lee S, Choi JH, Jung MH, Kim LS, Kim SH, Han S, Ryu KH. Development and Validation of a Risk Score Model for Predicting the Cardiovascular Outcomes After Breast Cancer Therapy: The CHEMO-RADIAT Score. J Am Heart Assoc 2021. [PMID: 34369199 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.121.02193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Background Cardiovascular disease is an important cause of mortality among survivors of breast cancer (BC). We developed a prediction model for major adverse cardiovascular events after BC therapy, which is based on conventional and BC treatment-related cardiovascular risk factors. Methods and Results The cohort of the study consisted of 1256 Asian female patients with BC from 4 medical centers in Korea and was randomized in a 1:1 ratio into the derivation and validation cohorts. The outcome measures comprised cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and transient ischemic attack/stroke. To correct overfitting, a penalized Cox proportional hazards regression was performed with a cross-validation approach. Number of cardiovascular diseases (myocardial infarction, peripheral artery disease, heart failure, and transient ischemic attack/stroke), number of baseline cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, age ≥60, body mass index ≥30 kg/m2, estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus), radiation to the left breast, and anthracycline dose per 100 mg/m2 were included in the risk prediction model. The time-dependent C-indices at 3 and 7 years after BC diagnosis were 0.876 and 0.842, respectively, in the validation cohort. Conclusions A prediction score model, including BC treatment-related risk factors and conventional risk factors, was developed and validated to predict major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with BC. The CHEMO-RADIAT (congestive heart failure, hypertension, elderly, myocardial infarction/peripheral artery occlusive disease, obesity, renal failure, abnormal lipid profile, diabetes mellitus, irradiation of the left breast, anthracycline dose, and transient ischemic attack/stroke) score may provide overall cardiovascular risk stratification in survivors of BC and can assist physicians in multidisciplinary decision-making regarding the BC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Do Young Kim
- Division of Cardiology Dongtan Sacred Heart HospitalHallym University College of Medicine Hwaseong Republic of Korea
| | - Myung-Soo Park
- Division of Cardiology Dongtan Sacred Heart HospitalHallym University College of Medicine Hwaseong Republic of Korea
| | - Jong-Chan Youn
- Division of Cardiology Dongtan Sacred Heart HospitalHallym University College of Medicine Hwaseong Republic of Korea.,Division of Cardiology Department of Internal Medicine Seoul St. Mary's HospitalCatholic Research Institute for Intractable Cardiovascular DiseaseCollege of MedicineThe Catholic University of Korea Seoul Republic of Korea
| | - Sunki Lee
- Division of Cardiology Dongtan Sacred Heart HospitalHallym University College of Medicine Hwaseong Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Hyuk Choi
- Division of Cardiology Dongtan Sacred Heart HospitalHallym University College of Medicine Hwaseong Republic of Korea
| | - Mi-Hyang Jung
- Division of Cardiology Dongtan Sacred Heart HospitalHallym University College of Medicine Hwaseong Republic of Korea
| | - Lee Su Kim
- Division of Breast and Endocrine Surgery Hallym University Sacred Heart HospitalHallym University College of Medicine Anyang Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Hea Kim
- Division of Cardiology Department of Internal Medicine Konkuk University HospitalSchool of MedicineKonkuk University Seoul Republic of Korea
| | - Seongwoo Han
- Division of Cardiology Dongtan Sacred Heart HospitalHallym University College of Medicine Hwaseong Republic of Korea
| | - Kyu-Hyung Ryu
- Division of Cardiology Dongtan Sacred Heart HospitalHallym University College of Medicine Hwaseong Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kim DY, Park M, Youn J, Lee S, Choi JH, Jung M, Kim LS, Kim SH, Han S, Ryu K. Development and Validation of a Risk Score Model for Predicting the Cardiovascular Outcomes After Breast Cancer Therapy: The CHEMO-RADIAT Score. J Am Heart Assoc 2021; 10:e021931. [PMID: 34369199 PMCID: PMC8475066 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.121.021931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Background Cardiovascular disease is an important cause of mortality among survivors of breast cancer (BC). We developed a prediction model for major adverse cardiovascular events after BC therapy, which is based on conventional and BC treatment-related cardiovascular risk factors. Methods and Results The cohort of the study consisted of 1256 Asian female patients with BC from 4 medical centers in Korea and was randomized in a 1:1 ratio into the derivation and validation cohorts. The outcome measures comprised cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and transient ischemic attack/stroke. To correct overfitting, a penalized Cox proportional hazards regression was performed with a cross-validation approach. Number of cardiovascular diseases (myocardial infarction, peripheral artery disease, heart failure, and transient ischemic attack/stroke), number of baseline cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, age ≥60, body mass index ≥30 kg/m2, estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus), radiation to the left breast, and anthracycline dose per 100 mg/m2 were included in the risk prediction model. The time-dependent C-indices at 3 and 7 years after BC diagnosis were 0.876 and 0.842, respectively, in the validation cohort. Conclusions A prediction score model, including BC treatment-related risk factors and conventional risk factors, was developed and validated to predict major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with BC. The CHEMO-RADIAT (congestive heart failure, hypertension, elderly, myocardial infarction/peripheral artery occlusive disease, obesity, renal failure, abnormal lipid profile, diabetes mellitus, irradiation of the left breast, anthracycline dose, and transient ischemic attack/stroke) score may provide overall cardiovascular risk stratification in survivors of BC and can assist physicians in multidisciplinary decision-making regarding the BC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Do Young Kim
- Division of CardiologyDongtan Sacred Heart HospitalHallym University College of MedicineHwaseongRepublic of Korea
| | - Myung‐Soo Park
- Division of CardiologyDongtan Sacred Heart HospitalHallym University College of MedicineHwaseongRepublic of Korea
| | - Jong‐Chan Youn
- Division of CardiologyDongtan Sacred Heart HospitalHallym University College of MedicineHwaseongRepublic of Korea
- Division of CardiologyDepartment of Internal MedicineSeoul St. Mary's HospitalCatholic Research Institute for Intractable Cardiovascular DiseaseCollege of MedicineThe Catholic University of KoreaSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Sunki Lee
- Division of CardiologyDongtan Sacred Heart HospitalHallym University College of MedicineHwaseongRepublic of Korea
| | - Jae Hyuk Choi
- Division of CardiologyDongtan Sacred Heart HospitalHallym University College of MedicineHwaseongRepublic of Korea
| | - Mi‐Hyang Jung
- Division of CardiologyDongtan Sacred Heart HospitalHallym University College of MedicineHwaseongRepublic of Korea
| | - Lee Su Kim
- Division of Breast and Endocrine SurgeryHallym University Sacred Heart HospitalHallym University College of MedicineAnyangRepublic of Korea
| | - Sung Hea Kim
- Division of CardiologyDepartment of Internal MedicineKonkuk University HospitalSchool of MedicineKonkuk UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Seongwoo Han
- Division of CardiologyDongtan Sacred Heart HospitalHallym University College of MedicineHwaseongRepublic of Korea
| | - Kyu‐Hyung Ryu
- Division of CardiologyDongtan Sacred Heart HospitalHallym University College of MedicineHwaseongRepublic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Golčić M, Tomaš I, Stevanović A, Golčić G, Dobrila-Dintinjana R, Erić S, Šambić-Penc M, Baretić Marinac M, Gović-Golčić L, Majnarić T. Smoking Cessation after a Cancer Diagnosis: A Cross-Sectional Analysis in the Setting of a Developing Country. Clin Pract 2021; 11:509-519. [PMID: 34449569 PMCID: PMC8395437 DOI: 10.3390/clinpract11030067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Revised: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Since smoking accounts for around 30% of all cancer deaths, public health campaigns often focus on smoking cessation as a means of primary prevention. However, smoking after cancer diagnosis is also associated with a higher symptom burden and lower survival rate. As data regarding smoking cessation vary dramatically between different populations, we aimed to analyze smoking prevalence in cancer patients, smoking cessation after cancer diagnosis, and the factors associated with smoking cessation in the setting of a developing country. We performed a cross-sectional survey on 695 patients in two clinical hospital centers. After cancer diagnosis, 15.6% of cancer patients stopped smoking. Male gender, younger age, and smoking-related cancer were the main factors associated with greater smoking cessation (p < 0.05). A total of 96% of breast cancer patients continued to smoke after cancer diagnosis and, compared to lung and colorectal cancer patients, exhibited a lower reduction in the number of cigarettes smoked (p = 0.023). An alarming rate of smoking prevalence was recorded in younger patients (45.6% at the time of cancer diagnosis) suggesting a future rise in smoking-related cancers and complications. These results should guide anti-smoking public health campaigns in transitional countries with a critical focus on younger and breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marin Golčić
- Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka, Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia; (G.G.); (R.D.-D.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +385-51-658-391
| | - Ilijan Tomaš
- Clinical Hospital Center Osijek, Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, 31000 Osijek, Croatia; (I.T.); (S.E.); (M.Š.-P.)
- School of Medicine, University of Osijek Josip Juraj Strossmayer, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
| | - Aleksandra Stevanović
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia;
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychological Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Goran Golčić
- Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka, Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia; (G.G.); (R.D.-D.)
| | - Renata Dobrila-Dintinjana
- Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka, Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia; (G.G.); (R.D.-D.)
| | - Suzana Erić
- Clinical Hospital Center Osijek, Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, 31000 Osijek, Croatia; (I.T.); (S.E.); (M.Š.-P.)
- School of Medicine, University of Osijek Josip Juraj Strossmayer, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
| | - Mirela Šambić-Penc
- Clinical Hospital Center Osijek, Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, 31000 Osijek, Croatia; (I.T.); (S.E.); (M.Š.-P.)
- School of Medicine, University of Osijek Josip Juraj Strossmayer, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
| | - Martina Baretić Marinac
- Family Medicine Practice, Community Health Center of Primorsko-Goranska County, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia; (M.B.M.); (L.G.-G.)
| | - Lidija Gović-Golčić
- Family Medicine Practice, Community Health Center of Primorsko-Goranska County, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia; (M.B.M.); (L.G.-G.)
| | - Tea Majnarić
- Institute of Emergency Medicine of Primorsko-Goranska County, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia;
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Bell RJ. Menopausal status at diagnosis of breast cancer and risk of metastatic recurrence. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 28:1079-1080. [PMID: 34260476 DOI: 10.1097/gme.0000000000001830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Robin J Bell
- Women's Health Research Program, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Rojewski AM, Fucito LM, Baker NL, Palmer AM, Foster MG, Warren GW, Bernstein SL, Toll BA. Preoperative contingency management intervention for smoking abstinence in cancer patients: trial protocol for a multisite randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e051226. [PMID: 34187835 PMCID: PMC8245459 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Continued smoking following a cancer diagnosis has substantial health risks including increased overall and cancer-specific mortality, risk of secondary malignancies, cancer treatment toxicity and risk of surgical complications. These risks can be mitigated by quitting smoking. The preoperative period represents a prime opportunity in which to administer robust smoking cessation treatment to both improve health and support and improve surgical outcomes. We will conduct a randomised clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of financial incentives delivered contingent on biochemically verified smoking abstinence (contingency management (CM)) in patients with cancer undergoing surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The study will take place across two study sites, and participants (N=282) who smoke, are diagnosed with or suspected to have any type of operable cancer and have a surgical procedure scheduled in the next 10 days to 5 weeks will be randomised to receive standard care plus Monitoring Only or CM prior to surgery. All patients will receive breath carbon monoxide (CO) tests three times per week, nicotine replacement therapy and counselling. The CM group will also earn payments for self-reported smoking abstinence confirmed by CO breath test ≤4 ppm on an escalating schedule of reinforcement (with a reset if they smoked). Point prevalence abstinence (PPA) outcomes (self-report of 7-day abstinence confirmed by CO≤4 ppm and/or anabasine ≤2 ng/mL) will be assessed on the day of surgery and 6 months after surgery. The effect of CM on 7-day PPA at the time of surgery and 6-month follow-up will be modelled using generalised linear mixed effects models. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study has been reviewed and approved by the Medical University of South Carolina Institutional Review Board. We will disseminate our scientific results through traditional research-oriented outlets such as presentations at scientific meetings and publications in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04605458.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alana M Rojewski
- Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
- Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Lisa M Fucito
- Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Nathaniel L Baker
- Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Amanda M Palmer
- Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
- Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Madeline G Foster
- Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Graham W Warren
- Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
- Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Steven L Bernstein
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
- Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Benjamin A Toll
- Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
- Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
- Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Nicolas M, Grandal B, Dubost E, Kassara A, Guerin J, Toussaint A, Laas E, Feron JG, Fourchotte V, Lecuru F, Girard N, Coussy F, Lavielle B, Kriegel I, Kirova Y, Pierga JY, Reyal F, Hamy AS. Breast Cancer (BC) Is a Window of Opportunity for Smoking Cessation: Results of a Retrospective Analysis of 1234 BC Survivors in Follow-Up Consultation. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:2423. [PMID: 34067742 PMCID: PMC8156674 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13102423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the most commonly diagnosed type of cancer and the leading cause of cancer deaths in women. Smoking is the principal modifiable risk factor for cancers and has a negative influence on long-term survival. We conducted a retrospective study on consecutive BC survivors seen at follow-up consultations between 3 June and 30 October 2019 at Institut Curie, Paris, France. Smoking behaviors were evaluated prospectively via interviewer-administered questionnaires. The aim of this study was to describe smoking-related patient care at diagnosis and smoking cessation patterns in women with a history of BC. A total of 1234 patients were included in the study. Smoking status at diagnosis was missing from electronic health records in 32% of cases, including 13% of patients who smoke. Only 20% of the 197 patients currently smoking at diagnosis recalled having a discussion about smoking with a healthcare professional. Radiotherapists and surgeons were more likely to talk about complications than other practitioners. The main type of information provided was general advice to stop smoking (n = 110), followed by treatment complications (n = 48), while only five patients were referred to tobaccologists. Since diagnosis, 33% (n = 65) of the patients currently smoking had quit. Patients who quit had a lower alcohol consumption, but no other factor was associated with smoking cessation. The main motivation for tobacco withdrawal was the fear of BC relapse (63%). This study highlights room for improvement in the assessment of smoking behavior. Our data raise important perspectives for considering BC treatment and follow-up as a window of opportunity for smoking cessation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion Nicolas
- Faculty of Medicine, Sorbonne Université, 75006 Paris, France;
- Department of Breast and Gynecological Surgery, Institut Curie, Université Paris, 75005 Paris, France; (B.G.); (E.D.); (A.T.); (E.L.); (J.-G.F.); (V.F.); (F.L.); (N.G.)
| | - Beatriz Grandal
- Department of Breast and Gynecological Surgery, Institut Curie, Université Paris, 75005 Paris, France; (B.G.); (E.D.); (A.T.); (E.L.); (J.-G.F.); (V.F.); (F.L.); (N.G.)
| | - Emma Dubost
- Department of Breast and Gynecological Surgery, Institut Curie, Université Paris, 75005 Paris, France; (B.G.); (E.D.); (A.T.); (E.L.); (J.-G.F.); (V.F.); (F.L.); (N.G.)
| | - Amyn Kassara
- Data Factory, Institut Curie, Université Paris, 75005 Paris, France; (A.K.); (J.G.)
| | - Julien Guerin
- Data Factory, Institut Curie, Université Paris, 75005 Paris, France; (A.K.); (J.G.)
| | - Aullene Toussaint
- Department of Breast and Gynecological Surgery, Institut Curie, Université Paris, 75005 Paris, France; (B.G.); (E.D.); (A.T.); (E.L.); (J.-G.F.); (V.F.); (F.L.); (N.G.)
| | - Enora Laas
- Department of Breast and Gynecological Surgery, Institut Curie, Université Paris, 75005 Paris, France; (B.G.); (E.D.); (A.T.); (E.L.); (J.-G.F.); (V.F.); (F.L.); (N.G.)
| | - Jean-Guillaume Feron
- Department of Breast and Gynecological Surgery, Institut Curie, Université Paris, 75005 Paris, France; (B.G.); (E.D.); (A.T.); (E.L.); (J.-G.F.); (V.F.); (F.L.); (N.G.)
| | - Virginie Fourchotte
- Department of Breast and Gynecological Surgery, Institut Curie, Université Paris, 75005 Paris, France; (B.G.); (E.D.); (A.T.); (E.L.); (J.-G.F.); (V.F.); (F.L.); (N.G.)
| | - Fabrice Lecuru
- Department of Breast and Gynecological Surgery, Institut Curie, Université Paris, 75005 Paris, France; (B.G.); (E.D.); (A.T.); (E.L.); (J.-G.F.); (V.F.); (F.L.); (N.G.)
| | - Noemie Girard
- Department of Breast and Gynecological Surgery, Institut Curie, Université Paris, 75005 Paris, France; (B.G.); (E.D.); (A.T.); (E.L.); (J.-G.F.); (V.F.); (F.L.); (N.G.)
| | - Florence Coussy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Université Paris, 75005 Paris, France; (F.C.); (B.L.); (J.-Y.P.); (A.-S.H.)
| | - Beatrice Lavielle
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Université Paris, 75005 Paris, France; (F.C.); (B.L.); (J.-Y.P.); (A.-S.H.)
| | - Irene Kriegel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Institut Curie, Université Paris, 75005 Paris, France;
| | - Youlia Kirova
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Curie, Université Paris, 75005 Paris, France;
| | - Jean-Yves Pierga
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Université Paris, 75005 Paris, France; (F.C.); (B.L.); (J.-Y.P.); (A.-S.H.)
| | - Fabien Reyal
- Department of Breast and Gynecological Surgery, Institut Curie, Université Paris, 75005 Paris, France; (B.G.); (E.D.); (A.T.); (E.L.); (J.-G.F.); (V.F.); (F.L.); (N.G.)
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Institut Curie, Université Paris, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Anne-Sophie Hamy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Université Paris, 75005 Paris, France; (F.C.); (B.L.); (J.-Y.P.); (A.-S.H.)
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Institut Curie, Université Paris, 75005 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Taborelli M, Dal Maso L, Zucchetto A, Lamaj E, De Paoli P, Carbone A, Serraino D. Prevalence and determinants of quitting smoking after cancer diagnosis: a prospective cohort study. Tumori 2021; 108:213-222. [PMID: 33876985 DOI: 10.1177/03008916211009301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe smoking behaviours of patients with incident cancer attending an Italian cancer centre and to examine changes in their smoking habits within 12 months from cancer diagnosis, evaluating determinants of smoking cessation. METHODS A hospital-based prospective cohort included patients hospitalized in an Italian cancer centre (2016-2018). Patients were mostly female (74%) and included a limited proportion of aerodigestive cancers (7%). Face-to-face interviews were performed during hospital stay to gather information on patient characteristics and smoking history. Changes in smoking habits were assessed through telephone interviews at 3, at 6, and at 12 months after cancer diagnosis. RESULTS Among 1011 enrolled patients, 222 (22%) were current smokers at cancer diagnosis. Smoking prevalence was high in male patients (30%), in patients <50 years old (28%), in those with aerodigestive cancers (50%), and in those diagnosed at advanced stages (26%). Among current smokers at cancer diagnosis, 38% quit smoking after 12 months, 26% reduced intensity, and 36% did not modify smoking habits. Smoking cessation was associated with chemotherapy and, although not statistically significant, with female sex, older age, and advanced cancer stage. Patients with gastrointestinal, breast, or genitourinary cancer and those treated with surgery were less likely to quit smoking. CONCLUSIONS Our results highlighted that 62% of smoking patients with cancer did not quit the habit. Smoking cessation programs targeted to patients with cancer need intensification, particularly for those who may underestimate smoking effects after diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Taborelli
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Luigino Dal Maso
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Antonella Zucchetto
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Elda Lamaj
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | | | - Antonino Carbone
- Scientific Directorate, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Diego Serraino
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Scheidl S, Avian A, Flick H, Gaal S, Greinix H, Olschewski H. Impact of smoking behavior on survival following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation - smoking cessation matters. Nicotine Tob Res 2021; 23:1708-1715. [PMID: 33837775 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntab070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There are only few data on the impact of smoking and smoking cessation on outcome of patients treated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, a well established therapy for hematologic malignancies. METHODS In a retrospective cohort study design we examined impact of smoking and smoking cessation on survival among 309 eligible consecutive adults who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using reduced-intensity (n=179) or myeloablative (n=130) conditioning between 1999 and 2018. RESULTS Smoking and was independently associated with increased mortality with a five-year overall survival of 25% in current smokers vs. 53% in never smokers vs. 48% in past smokers. Never smokers lived significantly longer (HR: 2.00, 95%CI: 1.19-3.35, p=0.008) and had a better event-free survival (HR: 2.11, 95%CI: 1.27-3.49, p=0.004) than current smokers. In the long run never smokers also lived significantly longer than past smokers (HR: 1.45, 95%CI: 1.16-1.81, p = 0.001). Patients who quit smoking prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation showed a tendency towards increased survival compared to those continued smoking (HR: 1.53, 95%CI: 0.95-2.45, p = 0.078). In relation to life-time cigarette dose smokers with low-dose (1-10 pack-years) cigarette consumption lived significantly longer (HR: 1.60, 95%CI: 1.03-2.50, p=0.037) and had a better event-free survival (HR: 1.66, 95%CI: 1.07-2.58, p=0.025) than patients with high-dose (≥ 10 pack-years) cigarette consumption. CONCLUSIONS In allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies, smoking history per se, life-time cigarette dose, and continued smoking, were significantly associated with increased all-cause mortality and reduced event-free survival. IMPLICATIONS Continued and past smoking represent established risk factors for malignant and non-malignant diseases, however, they are also a strong risk factor for a poor outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for hematologic diseases. Our study shows that the hazard ratio for death after such a transplantation is doubled if patients continue smoking and even if they have quit smoking, their risk remains significantly elevated. This suggests that the smoking history provides important predictive factors for outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and that smoking cessation should be implemented in the treatment of hematologic diseases as early as possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Scheidl
- Division of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz
| | - Alexander Avian
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz
| | - Holger Flick
- Division of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz
| | - Sonja Gaal
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Hildegard Greinix
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Horst Olschewski
- Division of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Salloum RG, D'Angelo H, Theis RP, Rolland B, Hohl S, Pauk D, LeLaurin JH, Asvat Y, Chen LS, Day AT, Goldstein AO, Hitsman B, Hudson D, King AC, Lam CY, Lenhoff K, Levinson AH, Prochaska J, Smieliauskas F, Taylor K, Thomas J, Tindle H, Tong E, White JS, Vogel WB, Warren GW, Fiore M. Mixed-methods economic evaluation of the implementation of tobacco treatment programs in National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers. Implement Sci Commun 2021; 2:41. [PMID: 33836840 PMCID: PMC8033545 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-021-00144-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Cancer Center Cessation Initiative (C3I) was launched in 2017 as a part of the NCI Cancer Moonshot program to assist NCI-designated cancer centers in developing tobacco treatment programs for oncology patients. Participating centers have implemented varied evidence-based programs that fit their institutional resources and needs, offering a wide range of services including in-person and telephone-based counseling, point of care, interactive voice response systems, referral to the quitline, text- and web-based services, and medications. Methods We used a mixed methods comparative case study design to evaluate system-level implementation costs across 15 C3I-funded cancer centers that reported for at least one 6-month period between July 2018 and June 2020. We analyzed operating costs by resource category (e.g., personnel, medications) concurrently with transcripts from semi-structured key-informant interviews conducted during site visits. Personnel salary costs were estimated using Bureau of Labor Statistics wage data adjusted for area and occupation, and non-wage benefits. Qualitative findings provided additional information on intangible resources and contextual factors related to implementation costs. Results Median total monthly operating costs across funded centers were $11,045 (range: $5129–$20,751). The largest median operating cost category was personnel ($10,307; range: $4122–$19,794), with the highest personnel costs attributable to the provision of in-person program services. Monthly (non-zero) cost ranges for other categories were medications ($17–$573), materials ($6–$435), training ($96–$516), technology ($171–$2759), and equipment ($10–$620). Median cost-per-participant was $466 (range: $70–$2093) and cost-per-quit was $2688 (range: $330–$9628), with sites offering different combinations of program components, ranging from individually-delivered in-person counseling only to one program that offered all components. Site interviews provided context for understanding variations in program components and their cost implications. Conclusions Among most centers that have progressed in tobacco treatment program implementation, cost-per-quit was modest relative to other prevention interventions. Although select centers have achieved similar average costs by offering program components of various levels of intensity, they have varied widely in program reach and effectiveness. Evaluating implementation costs of such programs alongside reach and effectiveness is necessary to provide decision makers in oncology settings with the important additional information needed to optimize resource allocation when establishing tobacco treatment programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramzi G Salloum
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2004 Mowry Road, Gainesville, FL, USA.
| | | | - Ryan P Theis
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2004 Mowry Road, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Betsy Rolland
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA.,University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Sarah Hohl
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Danielle Pauk
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Jennifer H LeLaurin
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2004 Mowry Road, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Yasmin Asvat
- Rush University Medical Center and Rush Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Li-Shiun Chen
- Washington University Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Andrew T Day
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Adam O Goldstein
- University of North Carolina Lineberger Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Brian Hitsman
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Deborah Hudson
- Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Andrea C King
- University of Chicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Cho Y Lam
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Katie Lenhoff
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | | | - Judith Prochaska
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Kathryn Taylor
- Georgetown University Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Janet Thomas
- University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Hilary Tindle
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Elisa Tong
- University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Justin S White
- Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - W Bruce Vogel
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2004 Mowry Road, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Graham W Warren
- Medical University of South Carolina Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Michael Fiore
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA.,University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Madison, WI, USA.,University of Wisconsin Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Morra A, Jung AY, Behrens S, Keeman R, Ahearn TU, Anton-Culver H, Arndt V, Augustinsson A, Auvinen PK, Beane Freeman LE, Becher H, Beckmann MW, Blomqvist C, Bojesen SE, Bolla MK, Brenner H, Briceno I, Brucker SY, Camp NJ, Campa D, Canzian F, Castelao JE, Chanock SJ, Choi JY, Clarke CL, Couch FJ, Cox A, Cross SS, Czene K, Dörk T, Dunning AM, Dwek M, Easton DF, Eccles DM, Egan KM, Evans DG, Fasching PA, Flyger H, Gago-Dominguez M, Gapstur SM, García-Sáenz JA, Gaudet MM, Giles GG, Grip M, Guénel P, Haiman CA, Håkansson N, Hall P, Hamann U, Han SN, Hart SN, Hartman M, Heyworth JS, Hoppe R, Hopper JL, Hunter DJ, Ito H, Jager A, Jakimovska M, Jakubowska A, Janni W, Kaaks R, Kang D, Kapoor PM, Kitahara CM, Koutros S, Kraft P, Kristensen VN, Lacey JV, Lambrechts D, Le Marchand L, Li J, Lindblom A, Lubiński J, Lush M, Mannermaa A, Manoochehri M, Margolin S, Mariapun S, Matsuo K, Mavroudis D, Milne RL, Muranen TA, Newman WG, Noh DY, Nordestgaard BG, Obi N, Olshan AF, Olsson H, Park-Simon TW, Petridis C, Pharoah PDP, Plaseska-Karanfilska D, Presneau N, Rashid MU, Rennert G, Rennert HS, Rhenius V, Romero A, Saloustros E, Sawyer EJ, Schneeweiss A, Schwentner L, Scott C, Shah M, Shen CY, Shu XO, Southey MC, Stram DO, Tamimi RM, Tapper W, Tollenaar RAEM, Tomlinson I, Torres D, Troester MA, Truong T, Vachon CM, Wang Q, Wang SS, Williams JA, Winqvist R, Wolk A, Wu AH, Yoo KY, Yu JC, Zheng W, Ziogas A, Yang XR, Eliassen AH, Holmes MD, García-Closas M, Teo SH, Schmidt MK, Chang-Claude J. Breast Cancer Risk Factors and Survival by Tumor Subtype: Pooled Analyses from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2021; 30:623-642. [PMID: 33500318 PMCID: PMC8026532 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-0924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Revised: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is not known whether modifiable lifestyle factors that predict survival after invasive breast cancer differ by subtype. METHODS We analyzed data for 121,435 women diagnosed with breast cancer from 67 studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium with 16,890 deaths (8,554 breast cancer specific) over 10 years. Cox regression was used to estimate associations between risk factors and 10-year all-cause mortality and breast cancer-specific mortality overall, by estrogen receptor (ER) status, and by intrinsic-like subtype. RESULTS There was no evidence of heterogeneous associations between risk factors and mortality by subtype (P adj > 0.30). The strongest associations were between all-cause mortality and BMI ≥30 versus 18.5-25 kg/m2 [HR (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19 (1.06-1.34)]; current versus never smoking [1.37 (1.27-1.47)], high versus low physical activity [0.43 (0.21-0.86)], age ≥30 years versus <20 years at first pregnancy [0.79 (0.72-0.86)]; >0-<5 years versus ≥10 years since last full-term birth [1.31 (1.11-1.55)]; ever versus never use of oral contraceptives [0.91 (0.87-0.96)]; ever versus never use of menopausal hormone therapy, including current estrogen-progestin therapy [0.61 (0.54-0.69)]. Similar associations with breast cancer mortality were weaker; for example, 1.11 (1.02-1.21) for current versus never smoking. CONCLUSIONS We confirm associations between modifiable lifestyle factors and 10-year all-cause mortality. There was no strong evidence that associations differed by ER status or intrinsic-like subtype. IMPACT Given the large dataset and lack of evidence that associations between modifiable risk factors and 10-year mortality differed by subtype, these associations could be cautiously used in prognostication models to inform patient-centered care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Morra
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Audrey Y Jung
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sabine Behrens
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Renske Keeman
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas U Ahearn
- National Cancer Institute, NIH, Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Hoda Anton-Culver
- Department of Epidemiology, Genetic Epidemiology Research Institute, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California
| | - Volker Arndt
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Annelie Augustinsson
- Clinical Sciences, Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Päivi K Auvinen
- Translational Cancer Research Area, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Oncology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Laura E Beane Freeman
- National Cancer Institute, NIH, Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Heiko Becher
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center ER-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carl Blomqvist
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Stig E Bojesen
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen General Population Study, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Manjeet K Bolla
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Sara Y Brucker
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Nicola J Camp
- Department of Internal Medicine and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Daniele Campa
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Federico Canzian
- Genomic Epidemiology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jose E Castelao
- Oncology and Genetics Unit, Xerencia de Xestion Integrada de Vigo-SERGAS, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Galicia Sur (IISGS), Vigo, Spain
| | - Stephen J Chanock
- National Cancer Institute, NIH, Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Ji-Yeob Choi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - Fergus J Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Angela Cox
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, Sheffield Institute for Nucleic Acids (SInFoNiA), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Simon S Cross
- Department of Neuroscience, Academic Unit of Pathology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Kamila Czene
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Thilo Dörk
- Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Alison M Dunning
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Miriam Dwek
- School of Life Sciences, University of Westminster, London, United Kingdom
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Diana M Eccles
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Kathleen M Egan
- Division of Population Sciences, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, North West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center ER-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Henrik Flyger
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Department of Breast Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Manuela Gago-Dominguez
- Galician Public Foundation of Genomic Medicine (FPGMX), Genomic Medicine Group, International Cancer Genetics and Epidemiology Group, Health Research Institute of Santiago (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Susan M Gapstur
- Behavioral and Epidemiology Research Group, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - José A García-Sáenz
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos (IdISSC), Centro Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mia M Gaudet
- Behavioral and Epidemiology Research Group, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Graham G Giles
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mervi Grip
- Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Pascal Guénel
- Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Team Exposome and Heredity, INSERM, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Christopher A Haiman
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Niclas Håkansson
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ute Hamann
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sileny N Han
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Leuven Multidisciplinary Breast Center, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven N Hart
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Mikael Hartman
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jane S Heyworth
- School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Reiner Hoppe
- Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany
- University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David J Hunter
- University of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Population Health, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Hidemi Ito
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Agnes Jager
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Milena Jakimovska
- MASA, Research Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology 'Georgi D. Efremov', Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Rudolf Kaaks
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daehee Kang
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Pooja Middha Kapoor
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cari M Kitahara
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Stella Koutros
- National Cancer Institute, NIH, Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Peter Kraft
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - James V Lacey
- Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, California
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, City of Hope, Duarte, California
| | - Diether Lambrechts
- VIB Center for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Human Genetics, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Loic Le Marchand
- Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii
| | - Jingmei Li
- Human Genetics Division, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Annika Lindblom
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Michael Lush
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Arto Mannermaa
- Translational Cancer Research Area, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Biobank of Eastern Finland, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Mehdi Manoochehri
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sara Margolin
- Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Shivaani Mariapun
- Breast Cancer Research Programme, Cancer Research Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
- Department of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Semenyih, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Keitaro Matsuo
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Dimitrios Mavroudis
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Roger L Milne
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Taru A Muranen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - William G Newman
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, North West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Dong-Young Noh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Børge G Nordestgaard
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen General Population Study, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nadia Obi
- Institute for Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andrew F Olshan
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Håkan Olsson
- Clinical Sciences, Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Christos Petridis
- Research Oncology, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul D P Pharoah
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Dijana Plaseska-Karanfilska
- MASA, Research Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology 'Georgi D. Efremov', Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia
| | - Nadege Presneau
- School of Life Sciences, University of Westminster, London, United Kingdom
| | - Muhammad U Rashid
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Basic Sciences, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre (SKMCH & RC), Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Gad Rennert
- Carmel Medical Center and Technion Faculty of Medicine, Clalit National Cancer Control Center, Haifa, Israel
| | - Hedy S Rennert
- Carmel Medical Center and Technion Faculty of Medicine, Clalit National Cancer Control Center, Haifa, Israel
| | - Valerie Rhenius
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Atocha Romero
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Elinor J Sawyer
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Guy's Campus, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Molecular Biology of Breast Cancer, University Womens Clinic Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lukas Schwentner
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Christopher Scott
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Mitul Shah
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Chen-Yang Shen
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Xiao-Ou Shu
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Daniel O Stram
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Rulla M Tamimi
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - William Tapper
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Rob A E M Tollenaar
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Ian Tomlinson
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics and Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Diana Torres
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Human Genetics, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Melissa A Troester
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Thérèse Truong
- Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Team Exposome and Heredity, INSERM, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Celine M Vachon
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Qin Wang
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Sophia S Wang
- Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, California
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, City of Hope, Duarte, California
| | - Justin A Williams
- Department of Internal Medicine and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Robert Winqvist
- Laboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor Biology, Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Laboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor Biology, Northern Finland Laboratory Centre Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Alicja Wolk
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anna H Wu
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Keun-Young Yoo
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Armed Forces Capital Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Jyh-Cherng Yu
- Department of Surgery, National Defense Medical Center, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei Zheng
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Argyrios Ziogas
- Department of Epidemiology, Genetic Epidemiology Research Institute, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California
| | - Xiaohong R Yang
- National Cancer Institute, NIH, Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - A Heather Eliassen
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michelle D Holmes
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Montserrat García-Closas
- National Cancer Institute, NIH, Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Soo Hwang Teo
- Breast Cancer Research Programme, Cancer Research Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ohde JW, Master Z, Tilburt JC, Warner DO. Presumed Consent With Opt-Out: An Ethical Consent Approach to Automatically Refer Patients With Cancer to Tobacco Treatment Services. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:876-880. [PMID: 33439692 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.03180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua W Ohde
- Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Zubin Master
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program and Center for Regenerative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Jon C Tilburt
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program; Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - David O Warner
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Kagedan DJ, Takabe K. Exploring the lengthiest ambulatory breast surgery clinic appointments: is the patient the problem? Gland Surg 2021; 10:551-558. [PMID: 33708538 DOI: 10.21037/gs-20-623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background Prolonged outpatient clinic appointments can disrupt schedules, impacting patients and providers. We sought to define features of the longest ambulatory appointments in a breast surgery clinic, and to ascertain whether patients attending these appointments consistently have protracted appointments. Methods A single-institution retrospective cohort study was conducted of breast surgery clinic patients, January 2017 to May 2019, and the longest 1% of appointments identified using a real-time patient tracking system. A primary chart review was performed, and data abstracted. Other appointments attended by these patients were identified, and the ratio of appointments >75th percentile duration (protracted appointments) to the total appointments during the study period was calculated, enabling comparison for patients with consistently protracted (ratio >50%) vs. sporadically protracted appointments (≤50%). Descriptive analysis was performed, and results reported as medians with inter-quartile ranges. Results A total of 15,265 clinic appointments were identified, and the longest 148 (exceeding 244 minutes) analyzed. Median appointment length was 264 minutes (inter-quartile range: 253-290). 70% were new patient appointments, and 54% of patients underwent a test/investigation that day. A minority were obese (39%), smokers (41%), diagnosed with a psychiatric comorbidity (34%), had a genetic cancer syndrome (22%), or received unexpected news at their appointment (16%). Of 118 patients with multiple appointments, 26% had consistently protracted appointments and 74% sporadically protracted appointments. Conclusions The lengthiest appointments are usually newly diagnosed cancer patients. Only a minority of patients have consistently protracted appointments, implying that a patient's previously prolonged appointment may not predict future long appointments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Kagedan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Kazuaki Takabe
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.,Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Tyagi A, Sharma S, Wu K, Wu SY, Xing F, Liu Y, Zhao D, Deshpande RP, D'Agostino RB Jr, Watabe K. Nicotine promotes breast cancer metastasis by stimulating N2 neutrophils and generating pre-metastatic niche in lung. Nat Commun 2021; 12:474. [PMID: 33473115 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-20733-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Smoking has a profound impact on tumor immunity, and nicotine, which is the major addictive component of smoke, is known to promote tumor progression despite being a non-carcinogen. In this study, we demonstrate that chronic exposure of nicotine plays a critical role in the formation of pre-metastatic niche within the lungs by recruiting pro-tumor N2-neutrophils. This pre-metastatic niche promotes the release of STAT3-activated lipocalin 2 (LCN2), a secretory glycoprotein from the N2-neutrophils, and induces mesenchymal-epithelial transition of tumor cells thereby facilitating colonization and metastatic outgrowth. Elevated levels of serum and urine LCN2 is elevated in early-stage breast cancer patients and cancer-free females with smoking history, suggesting that LCN2 serve as a promising prognostic biomarker for predicting increased risk of metastatic disease in female smoker(s). Moreover, natural compound, salidroside effectively abrogates nicotine-induced neutrophil polarization and consequently reduced lung metastasis of hormone receptor-negative breast cancer cells. Our findings suggest a pro-metastatic role of nicotine-induced N2-neutrophils for cancer cell colonization in the lungs and illuminate the therapeutic use of salidroside to enhance the anti-tumor activity of neutrophils in breast cancer patients. Smoking is known to impact tumor immunity and promote tumor progression. Here, the authors show that chronic nicotine exposure promotes the lung pre-metastatic niche formation by recruiting pro-tumor N2-neutrophils that release lipocalin-2.
Collapse
|
42
|
Enyioha C, Warren GW, Morgan GD, Goldstein AO. Tobacco Use and Treatment among Cancer Survivors. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17:ijerph17239109. [PMID: 33291274 PMCID: PMC7730918 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17239109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
Tobacco use is causally associated with the risk of developing multiple health conditions, including over a dozen types of cancer, and is responsible for 30% of cancer deaths in the U [...].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chineme Enyioha
- Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; (C.E.); (G.D.M.)
| | - Graham W. Warren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA;
| | - Glen D. Morgan
- Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; (C.E.); (G.D.M.)
| | - Adam O. Goldstein
- Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; (C.E.); (G.D.M.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Escala-Garcia M, Morra A, Canisius S, Chang-Claude J, Kar S, Zheng W, Bojesen SE, Easton D, Pharoah PDP, Schmidt MK. Breast cancer risk factors and their effects on survival: a Mendelian randomisation study. BMC Med 2020; 18:327. [PMID: 33198768 PMCID: PMC7670589 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01797-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Observational studies have investigated the association of risk factors with breast cancer prognosis. However, the results have been conflicting and it has been challenging to establish causality due to potential residual confounding. Using a Mendelian randomisation (MR) approach, we aimed to examine the potential causal association between breast cancer-specific survival and nine established risk factors for breast cancer: alcohol consumption, body mass index, height, physical activity, mammographic density, age at menarche or menopause, smoking, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS We conducted a two-sample MR analysis on data from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) and risk factor summary estimates from the GWAS Catalog. The BCAC data included 86,627 female patients of European ancestry with 7054 breast cancer-specific deaths during 15 years of follow-up. Of these, 59,378 were estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and 13,692 were ER-negative breast cancer patients. For the significant association, we used sensitivity analyses and a multivariable MR model. All risk factor associations were also examined in a model adjusted by other prognostic factors. RESULTS Increased genetic liability to T2DM was significantly associated with worse breast cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-1.17, P value [P] = 0.003). There were no significant associations after multiple testing correction for any of the risk factors in the ER-status subtypes. For the reported significant association with T2DM, the sensitivity analyses did not show evidence for violation of the MR assumptions nor that the association was due to increased BMI. The association remained significant when adjusting by other prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS This extensive MR analysis suggests that T2DM may be causally associated with worse breast cancer-specific survival and therefore that treating T2DM may improve prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Escala-Garcia
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anna Morra
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sander Canisius
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), Cancer Epidemiology Group, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Siddhartha Kar
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Wei Zheng
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Stig E Bojesen
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen General Population Study, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Doug Easton
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Paul D P Pharoah
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Stang A, Knowlton R, Rekowski J, Gershman ST, Galea S. Smoking cessation potential among newly diagnosed cancer patients: a population-based study of the ten most common cancers in Massachusetts, USA, 2008-2013. Ann Epidemiol 2020; 56:55-60.e11. [PMID: 33189878 DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Revised: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In cancer patients, cigarette smoking is causally linked with increased mortality. We examined the relationship between smoking status at the time of diagnosis and cancer mortality to help estimate the scope of smoking cessation services required to meet the needs of cancer patients. METHODS We studied the ten most common cancers in Massachusetts, 2008-2013 including 175,489 incident cases and used smoking status at the time of diagnosis to provide smoking prevalence. We calculated adjusted hazard ratios of all-cause mortality comparing smoker subgroups. RESULTS Smoking prevalence was more than threefold higher for lung cancer and more than twofold higher for head and neck cancer and bladder cancer than in the general population. Cancer cases who smoked at the time of diagnosis had a higher adjusted mortality rate than cancer cases who were former smokers. The three sites with the highest increased hazard ratios comparing current smokers with former smokers were cancers of the thyroid (HR = 1.67, 95% CI 1.14-2.45), head and neck (HR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.39-1.95), and prostate (HR = 1.60, 95% CI 1.36-1.90). CONCLUSIONS Smoking remains high among cancer patients. More widespread adoption of smoking cessation programs among cancer patients may play a substantial role in improving cancer morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Stang
- Institut für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Germany; School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA.
| | - Richard Knowlton
- Massachusetts Cancer Registry, Office of Data Management and Outcomes Assessment, Office of Population Health Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Jan Rekowski
- Institut für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Germany
| | - Susan T Gershman
- Massachusetts Cancer Registry, Office of Data Management and Outcomes Assessment, Office of Population Health Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Sandro Galea
- School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Barba D, León-Sosa A, Lugo P, Suquillo D, Torres F, Surre F, Trojman L, Caicedo A. Breast cancer, screening and diagnostic tools: All you need to know. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2020; 157:103174. [PMID: 33249359 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Revised: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 11/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of the most frequent malignancies among women worldwide. Methods for screening and diagnosis allow health care professionals to provide personalized treatments that improve the outcome and survival. Scientists and physicians are working side-by-side to develop evidence-based guidelines and equipment to detect cancer earlier. However, the lack of comprehensive interdisciplinary information and understanding between biomedical, medical, and technology professionals makes innovation of new screening and diagnosis tools difficult. This critical review gathers, for the first time, information concerning normal breast and cancer biology, established and emerging methods for screening and diagnosis, staging and grading, molecular and genetic biomarkers. Our purpose is to address key interdisciplinary information about these methods for physicians and scientists. Only the multidisciplinary interaction and communication between scientists, health care professionals, technical experts and patients will lead to the development of better detection tools and methods for an improved screening and early diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Barba
- Escuela de Medicina, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Ecuador; Instituto de Investigaciones en Biomedicina, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Ecuador; Mito-Act Research Consortium, Quito, Ecuador
| | - Ariana León-Sosa
- Escuela de Medicina, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Ecuador; Instituto de Investigaciones en Biomedicina, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Ecuador; Mito-Act Research Consortium, Quito, Ecuador
| | - Paulina Lugo
- Hospital de los Valles HDLV, Quito, Ecuador; Fundación Ayuda Familiar y Comunitaria AFAC, Quito, Ecuador
| | - Daniela Suquillo
- Instituto de Investigaciones en Biomedicina, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Ecuador; Mito-Act Research Consortium, Quito, Ecuador; Ingeniería en Procesos Biotecnológicos, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales COCIBA, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Ecuador
| | - Fernando Torres
- Escuela de Medicina, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Ecuador; Hospital de los Valles HDLV, Quito, Ecuador
| | - Frederic Surre
- University of Glasgow, James Watt School of Engineering, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Lionel Trojman
- LISITE, Isep, 75006, Paris, France; Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Colegio de Ciencias e Ingenierías Politécnico - USFQ, Instituto de Micro y Nanoelectrónica, IMNE, USFQ, Quito, Ecuador
| | - Andrés Caicedo
- Escuela de Medicina, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Ecuador; Instituto de Investigaciones en Biomedicina, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Ecuador; Mito-Act Research Consortium, Quito, Ecuador; Sistemas Médicos SIME, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Ecuador.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Day AT, Dahlstrom KR, Lee R, Karam-Hage M, Sturgis EM. Impact of a tobacco treatment program on abstinence and survival rates among current smokers with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2020; 42:2440-2452. [PMID: 32476217 PMCID: PMC8691203 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2019] [Revised: 03/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately one quarter of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients smoke cigarettes at the time of diagnosis. Despite HNC guideline recommendations to treat tobacco dependence, the effectiveness of treatment in this population is poorly described. METHODS This retrospective cohort review evaluated 117 current smokers with p16-negative mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma prospectively enrolled in a tobacco treatment program. Seven-day point prevalence tobacco abstinence rates at 9 months and survival outcomes were compared among abstinent and nonabstinent groups. RESULTS Median follow-up among survivors was 62.4 months. Forty percent of patients were abstinent at 9 months according to intention-to-treat analysis. After adjustment for age, comorbidity and site, abstinent stage I to II patients had a decreased risk of death compared to smoking stage I to II patients (HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.82). CONCLUSIONS High cohort abstinence rates and favorable survival among abstinent patients with early-stage HNC confirm the importance of tobacco dependence treatment in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew T. Day
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Population Science & Cancer Control, UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Kristina R. Dahlstrom
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Rebecca Lee
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Maher Karam-Hage
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Erich M. Sturgis
- Population Science & Cancer Control, UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Derksen JWG, Warren GW, Jordan K, Rauh S, Vera García R, O'Mahony D, Ahmed S, Vuylsteke P, Radulovic S, Tsoukalas N, Wysocki PJ, Borner M, Cesas A, Elme A, Minn H, Ullenhag GJ, Roodhart JML, Koopman M, May AM. European practice patterns and barriers to smoking cessation after a cancer diagnosis in the setting of curative versus palliative cancer treatment. Eur J Cancer 2020; 138:99-108. [PMID: 32871527 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.07.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Revised: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 07/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Smoking cessation after a cancer diagnosis is associated with improved overall survival. Few studies have reported oncologists' cessation practice patterns, but differences between the curative and palliative settings have not been described. We aimed to study the oncologist's perceptions on patients' tobacco use, current practices and barriers to providing smoking cessation support, while distinguishing between treatment with curative (C) and palliative (P) intent. METHODS In 2019, an online 34-item survey was sent to approximately 6235 oncologists from 16 European countries. Responses were descriptively reported and compared by treatment setting. RESULTS Responses from 544 oncologists were included. Oncologists appeared to favour addressing tobacco in the curative setting more than in the palliative setting. Oncologists believe that continued smoking impacts treatment outcomes (C: 94%, P: 74%) and that cessation support should be standard cancer care (C: 95%, P: 63%). Most routinely assess tobacco use (C: 93%, P: 78%) and advise patients to stop using tobacco (C: 88%, P: 54%), but only 24% (P)-39% (C) routinely discuss medication options, and only 18% (P)-31% (C) provide cessation support. Hesitation to remove a pleasurable habit (C: 13%, P: 43%) and disbelieve on smoking affecting outcomes (C: 3%, P: 14%) were disparate barriers between the curative and palliative settings (p < 0.001), but dominant barriers of time, resources, education and patient resistance were similar between settings. CONCLUSION Oncologists appear to favour addressing tobacco use more in the curative setting; however, they discuss medication options and/or provide cessation support in a minority of cases. All patients who report current smoking should have access to evidence-based smoking cessation support, also patients treated with palliative intent given their increasing survival.
Collapse
|
48
|
Song L, Guan T, Guo P, Song F, Van Houtven C, Tan X, Keyserling TC. Cardiovascular disease, risk factors, and health behaviors among cancer survivors and spouses: A MEPS Study. Cancer Med 2020; 9:6864-6874. [PMID: 32750221 PMCID: PMC7520310 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2020] [Revised: 05/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalences of CVD, CVD risk factors. and health behaviors among cancer survivor‐spouse dyads, assess how these prevalences differ by role (survivor vs spouse) and gender, and report congruences in health behaviors between survivors and their spouses. Methods We identified 1026 survivor‐spouse dyads from the 2010‐2015 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. We used weighted multivariable logistic and linear regressions to analyze the data related to CVD, CVD risk factors, and health behaviors. Results Survivors and spouses reported high prevalences of CVD and CVD risk factors but low engagement in healthy behaviors, including non‐smoking, physical activity, and maintaining a healthy weight (proxy for healthy diet). Gender and role differences were significantly related to the prevalence of CVD, CVD risk factors, and health behaviors among survivors and spouses. From 39% to 88% of survivors and spouses were congruent in their current smoking status, physical activity engagement/disengagement, and BMI. Conclusion Cancer survivors and spouses have high rates of CVD and CVD risk factors and poor engagement in healthful lifestyle behaviors. A high proportion of survivors and spouses were congruent in their current smoking status, physical activity engagement/disengagement, and BMI. Effective lifestyle interventions are needed for this high‐risk population. Couple‐focused interventions may be well‐suited for these dyads and warrant further study. Implications for Cancer Survivors Both cancer survivors and their spouses need to be non‐moking, more physically active, and maintain normal BMI in order to reduce their high risk of CVD and CVD risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lixin Song
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC-CH), Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC-CH, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Ting Guan
- School of Social Work, UNC-CH, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Peiran Guo
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC-CH), Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Fengyu Song
- General Education, West Coast University, Anaheim, CA, USA
| | - Courtney Van Houtven
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.,Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Xianming Tan
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC-CH, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Gillings School of Global Public Health, UNC-CH, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Bravo-jaimes K, Marcellon R, Varanitskaya L, Kim PY, Iliescu C, Gilchrist SC, Baldassarre LA, Manisty C, Ghosh AK, Guha A, Lopez-mattei JC. Opportunities for improved cardiovascular disease prevention in oncology patients. Curr Opin Cardiol 2020; 35:531-7. [DOI: 10.1097/hco.0000000000000767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
50
|
Evans A, Petty R, Macaskill J. Why is renal impairment associated with poorer cancer specific survival in breast cancer patients?: a comparison with patients with other comorbidities. Int J Clin Oncol 2020; 25:1786-1792. [PMID: 32617752 PMCID: PMC7498492 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-020-01733-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background Our aim is to assess whether the poor breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) seen in women with breast cancer and impaired renal function can be explained by associations with other prognostic factors. Methods The study group was a consecutive series of patients undergoing breast ultrasound (US) who had invasive breast cancer (n = 1171). All women had their US diameter and mean stiffness (kPa) at shear wave elastography (SWE) recorded. The core biopsy grade and receptor status were noted. Core biopsy of abnormal axillary nodes and the patient referral source was also noted. Survival including cause of death was ascertained. Comorbidities at diagnosis were recorded. Patients were divided into those with a GFR<60 (“renal group”), those with other comorbidities and those with none. BCSS was assessed using Kaplan–Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards regression. Results One thousand, one hundred and forty-one patients constituted the study group. 107 (9%) patients had impaired renal function, 182 (16%) had other comorbidities while 852 (75%) had no comorbidities. Mean follow-up was 5.8 years. 109 breast cancer and 122 non-breast cancer deaths occurred. BCSS in the renal group was significantly worse than the other groups. Women with renal comorbidity were older, more likely to present symptomatically, have a pre-operative diagnosis of axillary metastases, and have larger and stiffer cancers. Cox proportional hazards regression showed that renal impairment maintained independent significance. Conclusion The poor BCSS in women with impaired renal function is partially explained by advanced tumour stage at presentation. However, impaired renal function maintains an independent prognostic effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andy Evans
- Breast Imaging Group, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Mailbox 4, Dundee, DD1 9SY Scotland
| | - Russell Petty
- Medical Oncology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Mailbox 4, Dundee, DD1 9SY Scotland
| | - Jane Macaskill
- Department of Breast Surgery, Ninewells Hospital, Level 6, Dundee, DD1 9SY Scotland
| |
Collapse
|