1
|
Marolleau P, Tougeron D, Allignet B, Cohen R, Sefrioui D, Gallet B, Dumont F, Guimbaud R, Alouani E, Passot G, Desolneux G, Ghiringhelli F, Marchal F, Mourthadhoi F, Coriat R, Desgrippes R, Locher C, Goujon G, Des Guetz G, Aparicio T, Paubelle E, Dupré A, de la Fouchardière C. Complete pathological response after chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors in deficient MMR metastatic colorectal cancer: Results of a retrospective multicenter study. Int J Cancer 2023; 153:1376-1385. [PMID: 37403609 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Revised: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023]
Abstract
About 5% of the patients with metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRC) present microsatellite instability (MSI)/deficient mismatch repair system (dMMR). While metastasectomy is known to improve overall and progression-free survival in mCRC, specific results in selected patients with dMMR/MSI mCRC are lacking. Our study aimed to describe metastasectomy results, characterize histological response and evaluate pathological complete response (pCR) rate in patients with dMMR/MSI mCRC. We retrospectively reviewed data from all consecutive patients with dMMR/MSI mCRC who underwent surgical metastasectomy between January 2010 and June 2021 in 17 French centers. Primary outcome was to assess the pCR rate defined by tumor regression grade (TRG) 0. Secondary endpoints included relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), and explored TRG as predictive factor for RFS and OS. Among the 88 patients operated, 109 metastasectomies were performed in 81 patients after neoadjuvant treatment [chemotherapy ± targeted therapy (CTT): 69, 85.2%; immunotherapy (ICI): 12, 14.8%], and pCR was achieved in 13 (16.1%) patients. Among the latter, pCR rate were 10.2% in the patients having received CTT (N = 7) and 50.0% in the patients treated with ICI (N = 6). Radiological response did not predict TRG. With a median follow-up of 57.9 (IQR 34.2-81.6) months, median RFS was 20.2 (15.4-not reached) months, median OS was not reached. Major pathological responses (TRG0 + TRG1) were significantly associated with longer RFS (HR 0.12, 95% CI 0.03-0.55; P = .006). The pCR rate of 16.1% achieved with neoadjuvant treatment in patients with dMMR/MSI mCRC is consistent with previously reported rates in pMMR/MSS mCRC. Immunotherapy showed better pCR rate than chemotherapy ± targeted therapy. Further prospective trials are needed to validate immunotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment in resectable/potentially resectable dMMR/MSI mCRC and identify predictive factors for pCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Tougeron
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Poitiers University Hospital, University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Benoit Allignet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leon Berard Center, Lyon, France
| | - Romain Cohen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, and INSERM, Unité Mixte de Recherche Scientifique 938, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, Equipe Instabilité des Microsatellites et Cancer, Equipe labellisée par la Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, Paris, France
| | - David Sefrioui
- Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine and Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, IRON group, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Blandine Gallet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Val d'Aurelle Center, Montpellier, France
| | - Frédéric Dumont
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, France
| | - Rosine Guimbaud
- Digestive Oncology Department, Rangueil Hospital, University Hospital of Toulouse, France
| | - Emily Alouani
- Digestive Oncology Department, Rangueil Hospital, University Hospital of Toulouse, France
| | - Guillaume Passot
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | | | | | - Frédéric Marchal
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Lorraine Cancer Center, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France
| | - Farouk Mourthadhoi
- Department of General Surgery, Saint Etienne University Hospital, Jean Monnet University, Saint Etienne, France
| | - Romain Coriat
- Gastroenterology Department, Cochin University Hospital, Université de Paris, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Romain Desgrippes
- Gastroenterology Department, Saint Malo General Hospital, Saint Malo, France
| | - Christophe Locher
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, Meaux Hospital, Meaux, France
| | - Gaël Goujon
- Gastroenterology Department, Bichat Hospital, Paris, France
| | | | - Thomas Aparicio
- Gastroenterology Department, Saint Louis Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Etienne Paubelle
- Hematology Department, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France
| | | | - Christelle de la Fouchardière
- Medical Oncology Department, Leon Berard Center, Lyon, France
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chávez-Villa M, Ruffolo LI, Hernandez-Alejandro R. Liver transplantation for unresectable colorectal liver metastasis. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2023; Publish Ahead of Print:00075200-990000000-00066. [PMID: 37339517 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To summarize the current state of liver transplantation (LT) for unresectable colorectal liver metastases (uCRLM), and to address future directions. RECENT FINDINGS The Norwegian secondary cancer (SECA) I and SECA II studies demonstrated that after LT the 5-year survival of a highly selected group of patients with uCRLM could be as high as 60% and 83%, respectively. After long-term follow-up, the 5- and 10-year survival was shown to be 43% and 26%, respectively. Furthermore, data has accumulated in other countries and a North American study reported a 1.5-year survival of 100%. In addition, steady growth has been demonstrated in the US, with 46 patients transplanted to date and 19 centers enrolling patients for this indication. Lastly, although recurrence is almost universal in patients with a high tumor burden, it has not been an accurate surrogate for survival, reflecting the relatively indolent nature of recurrence after LT. SUMMARY Growing evidence has shown that excellent survival and even cure can be achieved in highly selected patients with uCRLM, with survival rates far superior than in patients treated with chemotherapy. The next step is to create national registries to standardize selection criteria and establish the optimal approach and best practices for incorporating LT for uCRLM into the treatment armamentarium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana Chávez-Villa
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, New York 14642, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Costa G, Cavinato L, Fiz F, Sollini M, Chiti A, Torzilli G, Ieva F, Viganò L. Mapping Tumor Heterogeneity via Local Entropy Assessment: Making Biomarkers Visible. J Digit Imaging 2023; 36:1038-1048. [PMID: 36849835 PMCID: PMC10287605 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-023-00799-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Advanced imaging and analysis improve prediction of pathology data and outcomes in several tumors, with entropy-based measures being among the most promising biomarkers. However, entropy is often perceived as statistical data lacking clinical significance. We aimed to generate a voxel-by-voxel visual map of local tumor entropy, thus allowing to (1) make entropy explainable and accessible to clinicians; (2) disclose and quantitively characterize any intra-tumoral entropy heterogeneity; (3) evaluate associations between entropy and pathology data. We analyzed the portal phase of preoperative CT of 20 patients undergoing liver surgery for colorectal metastases. A three-dimensional core kernel (5 × 5 × 5 voxels) was created and used to compute the local entropy value for each voxel of the tumor. The map was encoded with a color palette. We performed two analyses: (a) qualitative assessment of tumors' detectability and pattern of entropy distribution; (b) quantitative analysis of the entropy values distribution. The latter data were compared with standard Hounsfield data as predictors of post-chemotherapy tumor regression grade (TRG). Entropy maps were successfully built for all tumors. Metastases were qualitatively hyper-entropic compared to surrounding parenchyma. In four cases hyper-entropic areas exceeded the tumor margin visible at CT. We identified four "entropic" patterns: homogeneous, inhomogeneous, peripheral rim, and mixed. At quantitative analysis, entropy-derived data (percentiles/mean/median/root mean square) predicted TRG (p < 0.05) better than Hounsfield-derived ones (p = n.s.). We present a standardized imaging technique to visualize tumor heterogeneity built on a voxel-by-voxel entropy assessment. The association of local entropy with pathology data supports its role as a biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guido Costa
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Lara Cavinato
- MOX Laboratory, Department of Mathematics, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Fiz
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Martina Sollini
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Arturo Chiti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Guido Torzilli
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Ieva
- MOX Laboratory, Department of Mathematics, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133, Milan, Italy.
- CHDS - Center for Health Data Science, Human Technopole, Milan, Italy.
| | - Luca Viganò
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
- Hepatobiliary Unit, Department of Minimally Invasive General & Oncologic Surgery, Humanitas Gavazzeni University Hospital, Via M. Gavazzeni 21, 24125, Bergamo, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chávez-Villa M, Ruffolo LI, Tomiyama K, Hernandez-Alejandro R. Where Are We Now With Liver Transplant for Colorectal Metastasis? Curr Transpl Rep 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s40472-022-00373-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
5
|
Viganò L, Jayakody Arachchige VS, Fiz F. Is precision medicine for colorectal liver metastases still a utopia? New perspectives by modern biomarkers, radiomics, and artificial intelligence. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28:608-623. [PMID: 35317421 PMCID: PMC8900542 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i6.608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Revised: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The management of patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer is still debated. Several therapeutic options and treatment strategies are available for an extremely heterogeneous clinical scenario. Adequate prediction of patients’ outcomes and of the effectiveness of chemotherapy and loco-regional treatments are crucial to reach a precision medicine approach. This has been an unmet need for a long time, but recent studies have opened new perspectives. New morphological biomarkers have been identified. The dynamic evaluation of the metastases across a time interval, with or without chemotherapy, provided a reliable assessment of the tumor biology. Genetics have been explored and, thanks to their strong association with prognosis, have the potential to drive treatment planning. The liver-tumor interface has been identified as one of the main determinants of tumor progression, and its components, in particular the immune infiltrate, are the focus of major research. Image mining and analyses provided new insights on tumor biology and are expected to have a relevant impact on clinical practice. Artificial intelligence is a further step forward. The present paper depicts the evolution of clinical decision-making for patients affected by colorectal liver metastases, facing modern biomarkers and innovative opportunities that will characterize the evolution of clinical research and practice in the next few years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Viganò
- Department of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano 20089, MI, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele 20072, MI, Italy
| | - Visala S Jayakody Arachchige
- Department of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano 20089, MI, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele 20072, MI, Italy
| | - Francesco Fiz
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano 20089, MI, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Eriksson S, Bengtsson J, Torén W, Lätt J, Andersson R, Sturesson C. Changes in apparent diffusion coefficient and pathological response in colorectal liver metastases after preoperative chemotherapy. Acta Radiol 2022; 64:51-57. [PMID: 35084232 DOI: 10.1177/02841851221074496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The pathological response to preoperative chemotherapy of colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) is predictive of long-term prognosis after liver resection. Accurate preoperative assessment of chemotherapy response could enable treatment optimization. PURPOSE To investigate whether changes in lesion-apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measured with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used to assess pathological treatment response in patients with CRLMs undergoing preoperative chemotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients who underwent liver resection for CRLMs after preoperative chemotherapy between January 2011 and December 2019 were retrospectively included if they had undergone MRI before and after preoperative chemotherapy on the same 1.5-T MRI scanner with diffusion-weighted imaging with b-values 50, 400, and 800 s/mm2. The pathological chemotherapy response was assessed using the tumor regression grade (TRG) by AJCC/CAP. Lesions were divided into two groups: pathological responding (TRG 0-2) and non-responding (TRG 3). The change in lesion ADC after preoperative chemotherapy was compared between responding and non-responding lesions. RESULTS A total of 27 patients with 49 CRLMs were included, and 24/49 lesions showed a pathological chemotherapy response. After chemotherapy, ADC increased in both pathological responding (pretreatment ADC: 1.26 [95% confidence interval (CI)=1.06-1.37] vs. post-treatment ADC: 1.33 [95% CI=1.13-1.56] × 10-3 mm2/s; P = 0.026) and non-responding lesions (1.12 [95% CI=0.980-1.21] vs. 1.20 [95% CI=1.09-1.43] × 10-3 mm2/s; P = 0.018). There was no difference in median relative difference in ADC after chemotherapy between pathological responding and non-responding lesions (15.8 [95% CI=1.42-26.3] vs. 7.17 [95% CI=-4.31 to 31.2]%; P = 0.795). CONCLUSION Changes in CRLM ADCs did not differ between pathological responding and non-responding lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sam Eriksson
- Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Center for Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Johan Bengtsson
- Center for Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - William Torén
- Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Jimmy Lätt
- Center for Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Roland Andersson
- Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Christian Sturesson
- Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bonney GK, Chew CA, Lodge P, Hubbard J, Halazun KJ, Trunecka P, Muiesan P, Mirza DF, Isaac J, Laing RW, Iyer SG, Chee CE, Yong WP, Muthiah MD, Panaro F, Sanabria J, Grothey A, Moodley K, Chau I, Chan ACY, Wang CC, Menon K, Sapisochin G, Hagness M, Dueland S, Line PD, Adam R. Liver transplantation for non-resectable colorectal liver metastases: the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association consensus guidelines. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 6:933-946. [PMID: 34506756 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(21)00219-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Revised: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is a prevalent disease worldwide, with more than 50% of patients developing metastases to the liver. Despite advances in improving resectability, most patients present with non-resectable colorectal liver metastases requiring palliative systemic therapy and locoregional disease control strategies. There is a growing interest in the use of liver transplantation to treat non-resectable colorectal liver metastases in well selected patients, leading to a surge in the number of studies and prospective trials worldwide, thereby fuelling the emerging field of transplant oncology. The interdisciplinary nature of this field requires domain-specific evidence and expertise to be drawn from multiple clinical specialities and the basic sciences. Importantly, the wider societal implication of liver transplantation for non-resectable colorectal liver metastases, such as the effect on the allocation of resources and national transplant waitlists, should be considered. To address the urgent need for a consensus approach, the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association commissioned the Liver Transplantation for Colorectal liver Metastases 2021 working group, consisting of international leaders in the areas of hepatobiliary surgery, colorectal oncology, liver transplantation, hepatology, and bioethics. The aim of this study was to standardise nomenclature and define management principles in five key domains: patient selection, evaluation of biological behaviour, graft selection, recipient considerations, and outcomes. An extensive literature review was done within the five domains identified. Between November, 2020, and January, 2021, a three-step modified Delphi consensus process was undertaken by the workgroup, who were further subgrouped into the Scientific Committee, Expert Panel, and Transplant Centre Representatives. A final consensus of 44 statements, standardised nomenclature, and a practical management algorithm is presented. Specific criteria for clinico-patho-radiological assessments with molecular profiling is crucial in this setting. After this, the careful evaluation of biological behaviour with bridging therapy to transplantation with an appropriate assessment of the response is required. The sequencing of treatment in synchronous metastatic disease requires special consideration and is highlighted here. Some ethical dilemmas within organ allocation for malignant indications are discussed and the role for extended criteria grafts, living donor transplantation, and machine perfusion technologies for non-resectable colorectal liver metastases are reviewed. Appropriate immunosuppressive regimens and strategies for the follow-up and treatment of recurrent disease are proposed. This consensus guideline provides a framework by which liver transplantation for non-resectable colorectal liver metastases might be safely instituted and is a meaningful step towards future evidenced-based practice for better patient selection and organ allocation to improve the survival for patients with this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Glenn K Bonney
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore.
| | - Claire Alexandra Chew
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Peter Lodge
- Department of Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Joleen Hubbard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Karim J Halazun
- Division of Liver Transplantation and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Pavel Trunecka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Paolo Muiesan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Darius F Mirza
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - John Isaac
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Richard W Laing
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Shridhar Ganpathi Iyer
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Cheng Ean Chee
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore
| | - Wei Peng Yong
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore
| | - Mark Dhinesh Muthiah
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Fabrizio Panaro
- Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Saint Eloi Hospital, Montpellier University Hospital-School of Medicine, Montpellier, France
| | - Juan Sanabria
- Department of Surgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Axel Grothey
- Department of Medical Oncology, West Cancer Center and Research Institute, Germantown, TN, USA
| | - Keymanthri Moodley
- The Centre of Medical Ethics and Law, Department of Medicine, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | - Ian Chau
- Department of Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Albert C Y Chan
- Division of Liver Transplantation, Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Chih Chi Wang
- Department of Surgery, Liver Transplantation Centre, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Krishna Menon
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Gonzalo Sapisochin
- Abdominal Transplant and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgical Oncology, Multi-Organ Transplant Program, Division of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Morten Hagness
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Svein Dueland
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Pål-Dag Line
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - René Adam
- Hepato Biliary Surgery, Cancer and Transplantation Unit, AP-HP Paul Brousse Hospital, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fiz F, Costa G, Gennaro N, la Bella L, Boichuk A, Sollini M, Politi LS, Balzarini L, Torzilli G, Chiti A, Viganò L. Contrast Administration Impacts CT-Based Radiomics of Colorectal Liver Metastases and Non-Tumoral Liver Parenchyma Revealing the "Radiological" Tumour Microenvironment. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11071162. [PMID: 34202253 PMCID: PMC8305553 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11071162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Revised: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The impact of the contrast medium on the radiomic textural features (TF) extracted from the CT scan is unclear. We investigated the modification of TFs of colorectal liver metastases (CLM), peritumoral tissue, and liver parenchyma. One hundred and sixty-two patients with 409 CLMs undergoing resection (2017–2020) into a single institution were considered. We analyzed the following volumes of interest (VOIs): The CLM (Tumor-VOI); a 5-mm parenchyma rim around the CLM (Margin-VOI); and a 2-mL sample of parenchyma distant from CLM (Liver-VOI). Forty-five TFs were extracted from each VOI (LIFEx®®). Contrast enhancement affected most TFs of the Tumor-VOI (71%) and Margin-VOI (62%), and part of those of the Liver-VOI (44%, p = 0.010). After contrast administration, entropy increased and energy decreased in the Tumor-VOI (0.93 ± 0.10 vs. 0.85 ± 0.14 in pre-contrast; 0.14 ± 0.03 vs. 0.18 ± 0.04, p < 0.001) and Margin-VOI (0.89 ± 0.11 vs. 0.85 ± 0.12; 0.16 ± 0.04 vs. 0.18 ± 0.04, p < 0.001), while remaining stable in the Liver-VOI. Comparing the VOIs, pre-contrast Tumor and Margin-VOI had similar entropy and energy (0.85/0.18 for both), while Liver-VOI had lower values (0.76/0.21, p < 0.001). In the portal phase, a gradient was observed (entropy: Tumor > Margin > Liver; energy: Tumor < Margin < Liver, p < 0.001). Contrast enhancement affected TFs of CLM, while it did not modify entropy and energy of parenchyma. TFs of the peritumoral tissue had modifications similar to the Tumor-VOI despite its radiological aspect being equal to non-tumoral parenchyma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Fiz
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy; (M.S.); (A.C.)
- Correspondence: (F.F.); (L.V.); Tel.: +39-02-8224-7361 (L.V.)
| | - Guido Costa
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (G.T.)
| | - Nicolò Gennaro
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy; (N.G.); (L.S.P.); (L.B.)
| | - Ludovico la Bella
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20089 Milan, Italy; (L.l.B.); (A.B.)
| | - Alexandra Boichuk
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20089 Milan, Italy; (L.l.B.); (A.B.)
| | - Martina Sollini
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy; (M.S.); (A.C.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20089 Milan, Italy; (L.l.B.); (A.B.)
| | - Letterio S. Politi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy; (N.G.); (L.S.P.); (L.B.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20089 Milan, Italy; (L.l.B.); (A.B.)
| | - Luca Balzarini
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy; (N.G.); (L.S.P.); (L.B.)
| | - Guido Torzilli
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (G.T.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20089 Milan, Italy; (L.l.B.); (A.B.)
| | - Arturo Chiti
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy; (M.S.); (A.C.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20089 Milan, Italy; (L.l.B.); (A.B.)
| | - Luca Viganò
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (G.T.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20089 Milan, Italy; (L.l.B.); (A.B.)
- Correspondence: (F.F.); (L.V.); Tel.: +39-02-8224-7361 (L.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vigano L, Corleone P, Darwish SS, Turri N, Famularo S, Viggiani L, Rimassa L, Del Fabbro D, Di Tommaso L, Torzilli G. Hepatic and Extrahepatic Colorectal Metastases Have Discordant Responses to Systemic Therapy. Pathology Data from Patients Undergoing Simultaneous Resection of Multiple Tumor Sites. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:464. [PMID: 33530435 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13030464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The standard treatment of patients with hepatic and extrahepatic metastases from colorectal cancer is systemic chemotherapy. We assume that this therapy has the same effectiveness on all disease foci, independent of the involved organ. The effectiveness of chemotherapy is assessed by the pathological response rate: the higher the response rate, the higher the effectiveness of chemotherapy. In the present manuscript, we analyzed patients undergoing resection of hepatic and extrahepatic metastases from colorectal cancer after preoperative chemotherapy. We observed unexpected heterogeneity of the response to chemotherapy of distant metastases from colorectal cancer according to the involved organ. Peritoneal metastases had the highest pathological response rate, which was much higher than the hepatic metastases, while lung and lymph node metastases had extremely poor response rates. Such inhomogeneous effectiveness of systemic treatment in different organs open new perspectives in the treatment of colorectal cancer with distant metastases and oncological research. Abstract Background: Systemic therapy is the standard treatment for patients with hepatic and extrahepatic colorectal metastases. It is assumed to have the same effectiveness on all disease foci, independent of the involved organ. The present study aims to compare the response rates of hepatic and extrahepatic metastases to systemic therapy. Methods: All consecutive patients undergoing simultaneous resection of hepatic and extrahepatic metastases from colorectal cancer after oxaliplatin- and/or irinotecan-based preoperative chemotherapy were analyzed. All specimens were reviewed. Pathological response to chemotherapy was classified according to tumor regression grade (TRG). Results: We analyzed 45 patients undergoing resection of 134 hepatic and 72 extrahepatic metastases. Lung and lymph node metastases had lower response rates to chemotherapy than liver metastases (TRG 4–5 95% and 100% vs. 67%, p = 0.008, and p = 0.006). Peritoneal metastases had a higher pathological response rate than liver metastases (TRG 1–3 66% vs. 33%, p < 0.001) and non-hepatic non-peritoneal metastases (3%, p < 0.001). Metastases site was an independent predictor of pathological response to systemic therapy. Conclusions: Response to chemotherapy of distant metastases from colorectal cancer varies in different organs. Systemic treatment is highly effective for peritoneal metastases, more so than liver metastases, while it has a very poor impact on lung and lymph node metastases.
Collapse
|
10
|
Krasnodebski M, Kim BJ, Wei SH, Velasco JD, Nishioka Y, Vauthey JN. Chemotherapy in combination with resection for colorectal liver metastases – current evidence. Surgery in Practice and Science 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2020.100021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
11
|
Fiz F, Viganò L, Gennaro N, Costa G, La Bella L, Boichuk A, Cavinato L, Sollini M, Politi LS, Chiti A, Torzilli G. Radiomics of Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E2881. [PMID: 33036490 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12102881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Revised: 10/03/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Patients with liver metastases can be scheduled for different therapies (e.g., chemotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy, and ablation). The choice of the most appropriate treatment should rely on adequate understanding of tumor biology and prediction of survival, but reliable biomarkers are lacking. Radiomics is an innovative approach to medical imaging: it identifies invisible-to-the-human-eye radiological patterns that can predict tumor aggressiveness and patients outcome. We reviewed the available literature to elucidate the role of radiomics in patients with liver metastases. Thirty-two papers were analyzed, mostly (56%) concerning metastases from colorectal cancer. Even if available studies are still preliminary, radiomics provided effective prediction of response to chemotherapy and of survival, allowing more accurate and earlier prediction than standard predictors. Entropy and homogeneity were the radiomic features with the strongest clinical impact. In the next few years, radiomics is expected to give a consistent contribution to the precision medicine approach to patients with liver metastases. Abstract Multidisciplinary management of patients with liver metastases (LM) requires a precision medicine approach, based on adequate profiling of tumor biology and robust biomarkers. Radiomics, defined as the high-throughput identification, analysis, and translational applications of radiological textural features, could fulfill this need. The present review aims to elucidate the contribution of radiomic analyses to the management of patients with LM. We performed a systematic review of the literature through the most relevant databases and web sources. English language original articles published before June 2020 and concerning radiomics of LM extracted from CT, MRI, or PET-CT were considered. Thirty-two papers were identified. Baseline higher entropy and lower homogeneity of LM were associated with better survival and higher chemotherapy response rates. A decrease in entropy and an increase in homogeneity after chemotherapy correlated with radiological tumor response. Entropy and homogeneity were also highly predictive of tumor regression grade. In comparison with RECIST criteria, radiomic features provided an earlier prediction of response to chemotherapy. Lastly, texture analyses could differentiate LM from other liver tumors. The commonest limitations of studies were small sample size, retrospective design, lack of validation datasets, and unavailability of univocal cut-off values of radiomic features. In conclusion, radiomics can potentially contribute to the precision medicine approach to patients with LM, but interdisciplinarity, standardization, and adequate software tools are needed to translate the anticipated potentialities into clinical practice.
Collapse
|
12
|
Paulatto L, Dioguardi Burgio M, Sartoris R, Beaufrère A, Cauchy F, Paradis V, Vilgrain V, Ronot M. Colorectal liver metastases: radiopathological correlation. Insights Imaging 2020; 11:99. [PMID: 32844319 PMCID: PMC7447704 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-020-00904-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
With the development of chemotherapy regimens, targeted therapies, and hepatic surgery, the survival of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) has dramatically improved. Imaging plays a central role for the diagnosis, staging, and treatment allocation in these patients. To interpret CRLM on imaging, radiologists must be familiar with the main imaging features of untreated tumors as well as the modifications induced by systemic therapies, and their meaning in relation to pathological tumor response and tumor biology. CRLM have the same histological features as the primary tumor. Most are “non-otherwise specified” (NOS) adenocarcinomas. The mucinous tumor is the most common of the rare subtypes. In NOS tumors, imaging usually differentiates central areas of necrosis from peripheral proliferating tumors and desmoplastic reaction. Areas of mucin mixed with fibrosis are seen in mucinous subtypes to help differentiate the metastases from other tumors cysts or hemangiomas. After treatment, the viable tumor is gradually replaced by ischemic-like necrosis and fibrosis, and remnants cells are mainly located on the periphery of tumors. Imaging can help predict the degree of tumor response, but changes can be difficult to differentiate from the pretherapeutic appearance. When chemotherapy is interrupted or in case of resistance to treatment, a peripheral infiltrating halo of tumor growth may appear. The purpose of the article is to illustrate the significance of the imaging features of colorectal liver metastases during systemic therapy, using radiopathological correlations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luisa Paulatto
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Paris Nord Val de Seine, Beaujon, Hauts-de-Seine, Clichy, France
| | - Marco Dioguardi Burgio
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Paris Nord Val de Seine, Beaujon, Hauts-de-Seine, Clichy, France.,Université de Paris, Paris, France.,INSERM U1149, CRI, Paris, France
| | - Riccardo Sartoris
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Paris Nord Val de Seine, Beaujon, Hauts-de-Seine, Clichy, France.,Université de Paris, Paris, France.,INSERM U1149, CRI, Paris, France
| | - Aurélie Beaufrère
- INSERM U1149, CRI, Paris, France.,Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Paris Nord Val de Seine, Beaujon, Hauts-de-Seine, Clichy, France
| | - François Cauchy
- Department of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Paris Nord Val de Seine, Beaujon, Hauts-de-Seine, Clichy, France
| | - Valérie Paradis
- INSERM U1149, CRI, Paris, France.,Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Paris Nord Val de Seine, Beaujon, Hauts-de-Seine, Clichy, France
| | - Valérie Vilgrain
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Paris Nord Val de Seine, Beaujon, Hauts-de-Seine, Clichy, France.,Université de Paris, Paris, France.,INSERM U1149, CRI, Paris, France
| | - Maxime Ronot
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Paris Nord Val de Seine, Beaujon, Hauts-de-Seine, Clichy, France. .,Université de Paris, Paris, France. .,INSERM U1149, CRI, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Brouquet A, Benoist S. ASO Author Reflections: Discordant Pathologic and Radiologic Response of Colorectal Liver Metastases After Chemotherapy: Which One Should We Trust to Predict Outcome and to Tailor Postoperative Chemotherapy? Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:2886-2887. [PMID: 32170480 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08338-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Brouquet
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Oncologique, Hôpital Bicêtre - Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Sud, 94275, Le Kremlin Bicetre, France. .,Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Sud, 94275, Le Kremlin Bicetre, France.
| | - Stephane Benoist
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Oncologique, Hôpital Bicêtre - Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Sud, 94275, Le Kremlin Bicetre, France.,Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Sud, 94275, Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
| |
Collapse
|