Activated partial thromboplastin time and anti-xa measurements in heparin monitoring: biochemical basis for discordance

Early thrombus detection in the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit by noninvasive real-time ultrasonic sensors

Thrombus formation in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) remains a major concern as it can lead to fatal outcomes. To the best of our knowledge, there is no standard non-invasive method for quantitatively measuring thrombi. This study's purpose was to verify thrombus detection in an ECMO circuit using novel, non-invasive ultrasonic sensors in real-time, utilizing the fact that the ultrasonic velocity in a thrombus is known to be higher than that in the blood. Ultrasonic sensors with a customized chamber, an ultrasonic pulse-receiver, and a digital storage oscilloscope (DSO) were used to set up the measuring unit. The customized chamber was connected to an ECMO circuit primed with porcine blood. Thrombi formed from static porcine blood were placed in the circuit and ultrasonic signals were extracted from the oscilloscope at various ECMO flow rates of 1-4 L/min. The ultrasonic signal changes were successfully detected at each flow rate on the DSO. The ultrasonic pulse signal shifted leftward when a thrombus passed between the two ultrasonic sensors and was easily detected on the DSO screen. This novel real-time non-invasive thrombus detection method may enable the early detection of floating thrombi in the ECMO system and early management of ECMO thrombi.

Monitoring of Argatroban in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Study Comparing Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time, Point-of-Care Viscoelastic Testing with Ecarin Clotting Time and Diluted Thrombin Time to Mass Spectrometry

BACKGROUND

The direct thrombin inhibitor argatroban is indicated for the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia II, but it is also used off-label to treat critically ill patients presenting with heparin resistance, severe antithrombin deficiency, or hypercoagulability. Direct drug monitoring is not routinely available, and argatroban dosing is mainly based on global coagulation assays such as activated partial thromboplastin time (PTT) or diluted thrombin time (TT), both of which have limitations in patients with hypercoagulability.

METHODS

Blood samples were obtained from critically ill patients treated with argatroban. Activated PTT and diluted TT were measured with a STA R Max3 analyzer (STAGO Deutschland GmbH, Germany) using an argatroban-calibrated kit. Ecarin clotting time was measured using a point-of-care viscoelastic test device. Liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry was performed using a reversed-phase column, a solvent gradient, and an API4000 mass spectrometer with electrospray. Correlation was described using Pearson correlation coefficient r and Bayesian multilevel regression to estimate relationships between outcomes and covariates.

RESULTS

From June 2021 to March 2022, 205 blood samples from 22 patients were analyzed, allowing for 195 activated PTT-liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry comparisons, 153 ecarin clotting time-liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry comparison, and 105 diluted TT-liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry comparisons. Compared to liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry, performance of argatroban quantification was best for diluted TT (r = 0.91), followed by ecarin clotting time (r = 0.58) and activated PTT (r = 0.48). Regression analysis revealed that patients with sepsis were more prone to argatroban overdosing (coefficient, 4.194; 95% credible interval, 2.220 to 6.792).

CONCLUSIONS

Although activated PTT monitoring of argatroban is the most commonly used test, in critically ill patients, diluted TT provides more precise measurements. Alternately, point-of-care viscoelastic ecarin clotting time also provides guidance for argatroban dosing to identify overdosing if available. The data also suggested that patients with sepsis are at greater risk for argatroban overdosing.

EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE

Factors Influencing Anti-Xa Assays: A Multicenter Prospective Study in Critically Ill and Noncritically Ill Patients Receiving Unfractionated Heparin

BACKGROUND

 The presence of dextran sulfate (DS) in reagents and the type of blood collection tube (citrate/citrated-theophylline-adenosine-dipyridamole [CTAD]) can lead to discrepancies between unfractionated heparin (UFH) anti-Xa levels.

OBJECTIVES

 To evaluate the extent of the effect (1) of different reagents containing or not containing DS and (2) of the blood collection tubes, on UFH anti-Xa levels, in various clinical situations (NCT04700670).

METHODS

 We prospectively included patients from eight centers: group (G)1, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) after heparin neutralization (n = 39); G2, cardiothoracic intensive care unit (ICU) after CPB (n = 35); G3, medical ICU (n = 53); G4, other medical inpatients (n = 38). Blood was collected into citrated and CTAD tubes. Chromogenic anti-Xa assays were centrally performed, using seven reagent/analyzer combinations including two without DS. The association between anti-Xa levels and covariates was tested using a linear mixed-effects model.

RESULTS

 We analyzed 4,546 anti-Xa values from 165 patients. Median anti-Xa levels were systematically higher with reagents containing DS, whatever the patient group, with the greatest effect observed in G1 (0.32 vs. 0.05 IU/mL). Anti-Xa levels were slightly higher in CTAD than in citrate samples, irrespective of the assay. The model showed: (1) a significant dextran-patient group interaction (p < 0.0001), the effect of DS on anti-Xa levels varying from 30.9% in G4 to 296% in G1, and (2) a significant effect of CTAD, varying between patient groups (p = 0.0302).

CONCLUSION

 The variability of anti-Xa levels with a great overestimation of the values, using a reagent containing DS, can lead to different treatment decisions, especially after heparin neutralization by protamine. Clinical consequences of these differences remain to be demonstrated.

Defining heparin resistance: communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee of Perioperative and Critical Care Thrombosis and Hemostasis

The term heparin resistance (HR) is used by clinicians without specific criteria. We performed a literature search and surveyed our SSC membership to better define the term when applied to medical and intensive care unit patients. The most common heparin dosing strategy reported in the literature (53%) and by survey respondents (80.4%) was the use of weight-based dosing. Heparin monitoring results were similar based on the proportion of publications and respondents that reported the use of anti-Xa and activated partial thromboplastin time. The most common literature definition of HR was >35 000 U/d, but no consensus was reported among survey respondents regarding weight-based and the total dose of heparin when determining resistance. Respondent consensus on treating HR included antithrombin supplementation, direct thrombin inhibitors, or administering more heparin as the strategies available for treating HR. A range of definitions for HR exist. Given the common use of heparin weight-based dosing, future publications employing the term HR should include weight-based definitions, monitoring assay, and target level used. Further work is needed to develop a consensus for defining HR.

Variation in coagulation factor activity levels cause discrepancies between activated partial thromboplastin time and anti-Xa activity for heparin monitoring: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is primarily monitored using activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). However, the recent introduction of anti-activated factor X (anti-Xa) activity testing has provided a direct evaluation of Xa inhibition by anticoagulants. This study aimed to investigate discrepancies between APTT and anti-Xa activity during UFH monitoring in critically ill patients and explore their underlying causes.

METHODS

This study analyzed 271 pairs of laboratory test results from blood samples of 99 critically ill patients receiving continuous intravenous UFH. Theoretical APTT values were calculated using fitted curve equations from spiked sample measurements with anti-Xa activity. Samples were categorized into three groups based on the measurement of the APTT/theoretical APTT ratio: the lower group (< 80%), the concordant group (80-120%), and the upper group (> 120%).

RESULTS

The overall concordance rate between APTT and anti-Xa activity was 45%, with a 55% discrepancy rate. The lower group frequently showed apparent heparin overdoses, while coagulation factor activities in the lower and upper groups were higher and lower, respectively, than those in the concordant group. Particularly, the lower group exhibited higher factor VIII activity levels than the upper and concordant groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Discrepancies between APTT and anti-Xa activity were frequently observed, influenced by changes in coagulation factors activity levels. The lower and upper groups were classified as pseudo-heparin-resistant and coagulopathy types, respectively. Accurate monitoring of heparin in critically ill patients is crucial, especially in cases of pseudo-heparin resistance, where APTT values may wrongly indicate inadequate heparin dosing despite sufficient anti-Xa activity. Understanding these discrepancies is important for managing heparin therapy in critically ill patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable.

Discordance among assays for monitoring? Anticoagulation during extracorporeal life support

OBJECTIVES

The optimal method for monitoring of anticoagulation in patients on extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is unknown. The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between anti-factor Xa level (anti-Xa; IU/mL) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT; seconds) for monitoring intravenous unfractionated heparin anticoagulation in adult ECLS patients.

METHODS

Charts of all adult patients cannulated for ECLS from 2015 through 2017 were reviewed and laboratory and heparin infusion data were extracted for analysis. Time matched pairs of anti-Xa and aPTT were considered concordant if both laboratory values were within the same clinically utilized range. A hierarchical logistic regression model was used to determine factors associated with discordance while accounting for patient level effects.

RESULTS

A total of 1016 paired anti-Xa and aPTT values from 65 patients were evaluated. 500 (49.2%) paired samples were discordant with a degree of variability on linear regression (r2 = 0.315). The aPTT fell into a higher therapeutic range compared to the anti-Xa in 31.6% and lower in 17.3%. Logistic regression demonstrated that discordance was independently associated with time from initiation of ECLS (OR 1.17 per day, p < 0.001), average heparin infusion rate (OR 1.25 per U/kg/hr, p < 0.001), and INR (OR 3.22, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly half of all aPTT and anti-Xa values were in discordant ranges and discordance is more likely as the time on ECLS and the INR level increase. The use of either assay in isolation to guide heparin anticoagulation may lead to misestimation of the degree of anticoagulation in complex ECLS patients.

Concordance Between Active Partial Thromboplastin Time and Anti-Factor Xa Assays in Neurocritically Ill Patients Receiving Subcutaneous Heparin Prophylaxis

Background

Laboratory monitoring is not recommended when subcutaneous unfractionated heparin (SQ-UFH) is administered at prophylactic doses. However, aPTT prolongation and associated hemorrhage has been reported in the neurocritically ill. At our institution, Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit (Neuro-ICU) patients with prolonged aPTT are further evaluated with a follow up aPTT and anti-factor Xa.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to describe concordance between aPTT and anti-factor Xa in neurocritically ill patients receiving prophylactic SQ-UFH with evidence of aPTT prolongation.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of adult patients admitted to the Neuro-ICU from June 2017 to June 2019 was performed. Patients were included if they received SQ-UFH with aPTT levels and at least one anti-factor Xa level drawn within one hour of each other. Concordance between paired aPTT and anti-factor Xa was evaluated using Cohen's weighted kappa.

Results

Forty two patients with 56 paired aPTT and anti-factor Xa levels were included. The most prescribed SQ-UFH regimen was 5000 units every 8 hours (60.7%) and anti-factor Xa levels were drawn a median (IQR) of 5.7 (3.1-10.7) hours after the SQ-UFH dose. Only 16 (28.6%) pairs were in concordance. The analysis showed a weighted kappa of .09; 95% CI [-.05 to .22] indicating poor agreement.

Conclusions

In neurocritically ill patients receiving prophylactic SQ-UFH with aPTT prolongation, there was poor concordance between aPTT and anti-factor Xa. This suggests that aPTT prolongation may not be solely driven by heparin activity and further evaluation of mechanistic drivers for coagulopathy in this population is necessary.

Application of anti-Xa assay in monitoring unfractionated heparin therapy in contemporary antithrombotic management

INTRODUCTION

Unfractionated heparin remains the most widely used agent in the prevention and acute treatment of thrombosis. Pharmacological complexities of this intriguing agent mandate frequent monitoring of its anticoagulant properties to maintain safe and effective hematological outcomes. Although activated partial thromboplastin time has been the standard test to monitor unfractionated heparin therapy for many decades, the anti-Xa assay has emerged as a substitute or adjunct in many institutions.

AREAS COVERED

This brief report outlines the key features of anti-Xa assay in monitoring unfractionated heparin in acute management of thrombosis in various contemporary settings, with emphasis on evidence for clinical outcomes. PubMed.gov database was utilized to obtain the pertinent literature.

EXPERT OPINION

The anti-Xa activity is primarily a reflection of UFH concentration and does not account for other hematological variables frequently present in contemporary anticoagulation management. The advantage of the anti-Xa assay in monitoring UFH therapy is predicated upon its limitations to account for global physiological hemostasis. There are significant disease and drug interactions that may potentially result in false in-vitro analysis of anti-Xa activity. Routine application of the anti-Xa assay is not evidence-based at this time.

Anticoagulation Monitoring with Activated Partial ThromboPlastin Time and Anti-Xa Activity in Intensive Care Unit Patients: Interest of Thrombin Generation Assay

Current guidelines recommend monitoring the anticoagulant effect of unfractionated heparin (UFH) by measuring anti-Xa activity rather than activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation of aPTT, anti-Xa activity, and thrombin generation in UFH-treated ICU patients. A prospective observational pilot study was conducted in adult surgical ICU patients treated with UFH. aPTT and anti-Xa activity were monitored daily. The therapeutic target was aPTT between 50 s and 84 s, and/or anti-Xa between 0.3 and 0.7 U/mL. Correlation among aPTT, anti-Xa activity, and thrombin generation was determined by measuring endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), with the inflammatory response evaluated. C-reactive protein (CRP) was used as a marker of inflammatory response. The plasma of 107 samples from 30 ICU patients was analyzed. The correlation between aPTT and anti-Xa activity was 0.66, CI95% [0.54;0.76] (p < 0.0001). Although thrombin generation, aPTT, and anti-Xa were correlated with inflammatory responses, the correlation was higher with thrombin generation and anti-Xa activity compared to aPTT. When aPTT was in a therapeutic range, a low thrombin generation was observed but was 50% inhibited when anti-Xa was in a therapeutic range. Coagulation testing with aPTT, anti-Xa correlated with thrombin generation. A 50% decrease in thrombin generation was observed when anti-Xa was within a therapeutic range. Further work is needed to evaluate coagulation biomarker responses and clinical outcomes in specific ICU populations.

Validation of high concentrated thrombin time assay for unfractionated heparin monitoring

Background

The high concentrated thrombin time (hcTT), a thrombin time modified by increasing the thrombin concentration, is a possible alternative assay to activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in unfractionated heparin (UFH) monitoring. This study aimed to determine the optimal thrombin concentration used in the hcTT assay for UFH monitoring.

Methods

A total of 30 blood samples obtained from healthy volunteers were included in this study. Thrombin concentrations of 10.0, 15.0, 20.0, and 25.0 IU/ml were used in the hcTT assay. The consistency between the hcTT and anti‐FXa assays was evaluated. To validate the hcTT assay, linearity, repeatability, reproducibility, and diagnostic performance of the assay were assessed.

Results

The hcTT assay using thrombin concentration of 15.0 IU/ml showed a strong correlation to the anti‐FXa assay with R² of 0.72 and the Spearman's correlation coefficient (r_s) of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96–0.98). Within‐run and day‐to‐day run variabilities of the assay were satisfactory (all coefficients of variation <10%). We found an excellent correlation between the results which were measured using different reagents with intra‐ or inter‐laboratory instruments. Notably, as compared to the aPTT assay, the hcTT assay showed a significantly better performance in identifying the samples which contain UFH at the supratherapeutic level, with an AUC of 0.97 vs. 0.91, p = 0.049.

Conclusion

The hcTT assay can be used as an alternative assay for UFH therapy monitoring. A further study using clinical samples is recommended to confirm the appropriateness of the hcTT assay for clinical application.

The Changing Landscape of Anticoagulation in Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Use of the Direct Thrombin Inhibitors

Bleeding and thrombosis frequently occur in pediatric patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy. Until now, most patients are anticoagulated with unfractionated heparin (UFH). However, heparin has many disadvantages, such as binding to other plasma proteins and endothelial cells in addition to antithrombin, causing an unpredictable response, challenging monitoring, development of heparin resistance, and risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs), such as bivalirudin and argatroban, might be a good alternative. This review will discuss the use of both UFH and DTIs in pediatric patients with ECMO therapy.

Monitoring of Unfractionated Heparin Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit Using a Point-of-Care aPTT: A Comparative, Longitudinal Observational Study with Laboratory-Based aPTT and Anti-Xa Activity Measurement

Continuous intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) is administered routinely in the intensive care unit (ICU) for the anticoagulation of patients, and monitoring is performed by the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) or anti-Xa activity. However, these strategies are associated with potentially large time intervals before dose adjustments, which could be detrimental to the patient. The aim of the study was to compare a point-of-care (POCT) version of the APTT to (i) laboratory-based APTT and (ii) measurements of anti-Xa activity in terms of correlation, agreement and turnaround time (TAT). Thirty-five ICU patients requiring UFH therapy were prospectively included and followed longitudinally for a maximum duration of 15 days. UFH was administered according to a local adaptation of Raschke and Amanzadeh’s aPTT nomograms. Simultaneous measurements of POCT-APTT (CoaguCheck® aPTT Test, Roche Diagnostics) on a drop of fresh whole blood, laboratory-based APTT (C.K. Prest®, Stago) and anti-Xa activity (STA®Liquid anti-Xa, Stago) were systematically performed two to six times a day. Antithrombin, C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, factor VIII and lupus anticoagulant were measured. The time tracking of sampling and analysis was recorded. The overall correlation between POCT-APTT and laboratory APTT (n = 795 pairs) was strongly positive (rs = 0.77, p < 0.0001), and between POCT-APTT and anti-Xa activity (n = 729 pairs) was weakly positive (rs = 0.46, p < 0.0001). Inter-method agreement (Cohen’s kappa (k)) between POCT and laboratory APTT was 0.27, and between POCT and anti-Xa activity was 0.30. The median TATs from sample collection to the lab delivery of results for lab-APTT and anti-Xa were 50.9 min (interquartile range (IQR), 38.4−69.1) and 66.3 min (IQR, 49.0−91.8), respectively, while the POCT delivered results in less than 5 min (p < 0.0001). Although the use of the POCT-APTT device significantly reduced the time to results, the results obtained were poorly consistent with those obtained by lab-APTT or anti-Xa activity, and therefore it should not be used with the nomograms developed for lab-APTT.

Impact of Protocolized Pharmacist Intervention on Critical Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time Values With Heparin Infusions

Background: Unfractionated heparin (UFH) infusions are commonly managed with nurse-driven nomograms titrated to activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). In some patients, anti-Xa values may be more appropriate measures of anticoagulation. At the present institution, an update to the nurse-driven aPTT nomogram requires pharmacist notification and clinical assessment for critically supratherapeutic aPTT results. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the nomogram update. Methods: A single-center, retrospective, pre-post analysis was conducted in patients treated with UFH who experienced a critical aPTT during the 6 months preceding and following the nomogram update. Patients with erroneous critical aPTT results were excluded. The primary endpoint was the time in therapeutic range (Rosendaal method) from the first critical aPTT until UFH discontinuation. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients transitioned to anti-Xa monitoring and the incidence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 2, 3, 5 bleeding. Data were analyzed by the χ² test. The study was institutional review board approved. Results: Of 277 UFH infusions, 142 belonged to the pre-implementation group and 135 to the post-implementation group. Baseline aPTTs were similar between the 2 groups. Time in therapeutic range was 58.1% versus 62.4% of between groups (P = .467). UFH was transitioned to pharmacist-driven anti-Xa monitoring in 16.2% versus 40.3% of patients (P < .001). BARC 2, 3, 5 bleeding occurred in 23.2% versus 13.4% of patients (P < .001). Conclusions: Application of these data suggest improved safety and efficacy outcomes with directed pharmacist management of UFH in patients with critically elevated aPTTs.

Comparison of clinical outcomes using activated partial thromboplastin time versus antifactor-Xa for monitoring therapeutic unfractionated heparin: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Continuous intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) is a mainstay of therapeutic anticoagulation in the acute setting. The two most common laboratory tests for monitoring UFH are the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and antifactor Xa (anti-Xa) heparin assay. We reviewed the available evidence to evaluate if the choice of monitoring test for UFH therapy is associated with a difference in the clinical outcomes of bleeding, thrombosis, or mortality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE, Cochrane database, and conference abstracts from the Society of Critical Care Medicine, the American Society of Hematology, and the American College of Clinical Pharmacy were searched for all studies comparing aPTT and anti-Xa monitoring for therapeutic UFH that evaluated outcomes for bleeding, thrombotic events, or mortality. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Pooled relative risk ratios were calculated using an inverse variance-weighted random-effects model.

RESULTS

Ten studies (n = 6677) were included for analysis. The use of anti-Xa compared to aPTT was not associated with an increased risk of bleeding (RR 1.03; 95% CI 0.8-1.22 I² = 4%) or an increased risk of thrombotic events (RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.76-1.30, I² = 3%). There was no difference in mortality within individual studies but the data were not suitable for pooled analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Pooled data comparing aPTT vs. anti-Xa for monitoring therapeutic UFH did not suggest differences in the outcomes of bleeding or thrombosis.

From Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time to Antifactor Xa and Back Again

OBJECTIVES

Monitoring is essential to safe anticoagulation prescribing and requires close collaboration among pathologists, clinicians, and pharmacists.

METHODS

We describe our experience in the evolving strategy for laboratory testing of unfractionated heparin (UFH).

RESULTS

An intrainstitutional investigation revealed significant discordance between activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and antifactor Xa (anti-Xa) assays, prompting a transition from the former to the latter in 2013. With the increasing use of oral factor Xa inhibitors (eg, apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, betrixaban), which interfere with the anti-Xa assay, we adapted our protocol again to incorporate aPTT in patients admitted on oral Xa inhibitors who require transition to UFH.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience demonstrates key challenges in anticoagulation and highlights the importance of clinical pathologists in helping health systems adapt to the changing anticoagulation landscape.

Management of therapeutic unfractionated heparin in COVID-19 patients: A retrospective cohort study

Background

Patients hospitalized with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection are at risk for thrombotic complications necessitating use of therapeutic unfractionated heparin (UFH). Full-dose anticoagulation limits requirements for organ support interventions in moderately ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Given this benefit, it is important to evaluate response to therapeutic anticoagulation in this population.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to assess therapeutic UFH infusions and associated bleeding risk in patients with COVID-19.

Patients/Methods

This retrospective cohort study includes patients at Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, receiving weight-based nursing-nomogram titrated UFH infusion during a 10-week surge in COVID-19 hospitalizations. Of 358 patients on therapeutic UFH during this interval, 97 (27.1%) had confirmed COVID-19. Patient characteristics, laboratory values, and information regarding UFH infusion and bleeding events were obtained from the electronic medical record.

Results

Patients who were COVID-19 positive had fewer therapeutic activatrd partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs) compared to COVID-19-negative patients (median rate, 40.0% vs 53.1%; P < .0005). Both major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding were increased in COVID-19-positive patients, with major bleeding observed in 10.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.7%-17.9%) of patients who were COVID-19 positive and 3.1% (95% CI, 1.6%-5.9%) of patients who were COVID-19 negative (P < .005). In logistic regression, bleeding events were associated with receiving UFH for longer than 7 days, but not platelet count, coagulation, or inflammatory measurements.

Conclusions

Our data indicate a higher incidence of bleeding complications in patients with COVID-19 receiving weight-based nursing-nomogram titrated UFH infusions despite a higher prevalence of subtherapeutic aPTTs in this population. These data underscore the need for prospective studies aimed at improving the quality and safety of therapeutic anticoagulation in patients with COVID-19.

Pseudo Heparin Resistance After Pulmonary Endarterectomy: Role of Thrombus Production of Factor VIII

Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is the main treatment for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Postoperative unfractionated heparin dosing can be monitored by activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) or by anti-factor Xa activity (anti-Xa). In pseudo heparin resistance, APTT response to heparin is blunted due to elevated Factor VIII (FVIII) which can underestimate anticoagulation. We examined possible pseudo heparin resistance after PEA and assessed the impact of FVIII. APTT response to heparin before and after operation was determined in 13 PEA patients anticoagulated with unfractionated heparin. APTT and anti-Xa concordance was analyzed from paired postoperative samples, and antithrombin, fibrinogen and FVIII levels were measured. Single-cell RNA sequencing was used to characterize FVIII gene expression in PEA specimens of 5 patients. APTT response to heparin was blunted after PEA. APTT and anti-Xa were discordant in 36% of postoperative samples and most common discordant patterns were subtherapeutic APTT with therapeutic (16%) or supratherapeutic (11%) anti-Xa. Overall, APTT underestimated anticoagulation relative to anti-Xa in one-third of the samples. FVIII levels were elevated before surgery, increased substantially 1 and 3 days (median 4.32 IU/mL) after PEA, and were higher in discordant than concordant samples. Single-cell RNA sequencing showed FVIII gene expression in PEA specimen endothelial cells. Pseudo heparin resistance is common after PEA likely due to highly elevated postoperative FVIII levels indicating that anti-Xa reflects postoperative heparinization better than APTT in these patients. FVIII production by the pulmonary artery endothelium may participate in local prothrombotic processes important for CTEPH pathogenesis.

Real-time, non-invasive thrombus detection in an extracorporeal circuit using micro-optical thrombus sensors

Introduction:

Real-time, non-invasive monitoring of thrombus formation in extracorporeal circuits has yet to be achieved. To address the challenges of conventional optical thrombus detection methods requiring large devices that limit detection capacity, we developed a micro-optical thrombus sensor.

Methods:

The proposed micro-optical thrombus sensor can detect the intensity of light scattered by blood at wavelengths of 660 and 855 nm. Two thrombus sensors were installed on in vitro circuit: one at the rotary blood pump and one at a flow channel. To evaluate the variation in the ratio of incident light intensity at each wavelength of the two sensors, R_fluct (for 660 nm) and I_fluct (for 855 nm) were defined. Using fresh porcine blood as a working fluid, we performed in vitro tests of haematocrit (Hct) and oxygen saturation (SaO₂) variation and thrombus detection. Thrombus tests were terminated after R_fluct or I_fluct showed a larger change than the maximum range of those in the Hct and SaO₂ variation test.

Results:

In all three thrombus detection tests, I_fluct showed a larger change than the maximum range of those in the Hct and SaO₂ variation test. After the tests, thrombus formation was confirmed in the pump, and there was no thrombus in the flow channel. The results indicate that I_fluct is an effective parameter for identifying the presence of a thrombus.

Conclusion:

Thrombus detection in an extracorporeal circuit using the developed micro-optical sensors was successfully demonstrated in an in vitro test.

Platelet factor-4 concentration in adult veno-arterial ECMO patients

BACKGROUND

Heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is reported at a variable rate in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients. A critical factor impacting platelet factor-4 (PF4)-heparin antibody formation is plasma PF4 concentration. We hypothesized that PF4 concentration would be increased during veno-arterial (VA) ECMO.

METHODS

Plasma PF4 concentration was measured during the first 5 ECMO days in 20 VA ECMO patients and 10 control plasma samples. PF4-heparin ratios were estimated using an assumed heparin concentration of 0.4 IU/mL. This correlates with an activated partial thromboplastin time of 60 to 80 seconds, which is the anticoagulation target in our center.

RESULTS

Twenty VA ECMO patients were enrolled, 10 of which had pulmonary embolism. Median PF4 concentration was 0.03 µg/mL [0.01, 0.13] in control plasma. Median PF4 concentration was 0.21 µg/mL [0.12, 0.34] on ECMO day 1 or 2, 0.16 µg/mL [0.09, 0.25] on ECMO day 3, and 0.12 µg/mL [0.09, 0.22] on ECMO day 5. Estimated median PF4-heparin ratios were 0.04, 0.03, and 0.02 respectively. Two patients (10%) developed HIT that was confirmed by serotonin release assay. PF4 concentration did not differ significantly in these patients compared to non-HIT patients (p = 0.37). No patient had an estimated PF4-heparin ratio between 0.7 and 1.4, which is the reported optimal range for PF4-heparin antibody formation.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that PF4 concentration is mildly elevated during VA ECMO compared to control plasma. Estimated PF4-heparin ratios were not optimal for HIT antibody formation. These data support epidemiologic studies where HIT incidence is low during VA ECMO.

Effectiveness of a Calculation-Free Weight-Based Unfractionated Heparin Nomogram With Anti-Xa Level Monitoring Compared With Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time

BACKGROUND

Accurate monitoring of intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) is essential to mitigate the risk of adverse drug events associated with dosing errors. Although recent data support anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) monitoring preferentially over activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) to improve time to therapeutic anticoagulation, the utility of incorporating anti-Xa monitoring with a calculation-free weight-based UFH nomogram has not been formally evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the time to therapeutic anticoagulation of a calculation-free weight-based UFH nomogram integrated with anti-Xa monitoring versus a historical control of aPTT monitoring utilizing manual dose calculations.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of patients with anti-Xa monitoring and a novel calculation-free weight-based UFH nomogram compared with a historical control with aPTT monitoring and manual calculations.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients in the aPTT cohort and 100 patients in the anti-Xa cohort were analyzed. The anti-Xa cohort achieved goal therapeutic target 3.8 hours sooner than the aPTT cohort (P = 0.03). Patients with anti-Xa monitoring required 1 fewer adjustment per 2.5 patient-days of UFH with the venous thromboembolism nomogram (P = 0.02). Patients in the aPTT cohort required more infusion interruptions because of supratherapeutic values (P = 0.007) and boluses because of subtherapeutic values (P = 0.044). There were no differences in rates of thromboembolism, major bleeding, or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding between the cohorts.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

This study demonstrated that anti-Xa UFH monitoring integrated with a calculation-free nomogram results in faster time to therapeutic anticoagulation and fewer dose adjustments compared with aPTT monitoring with manual calculations.

C-reactive protein-induced activated partial thromboplastin time prolongation in heparinized samples is attenuated by elevated factor VIII

INTRODUCTION

Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and antifactor Xa (anti-Xa) activity are used to monitor unfractionated heparin therapy in children on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) can prolong aPTT and cause discrepancy between these two assays. We aimed to evaluate CRP effect on aPTT and anti-Xa assays in the presence of heparin and to determine whether elevated CRP affects laboratory monitoring in pediatric ECMO patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Citrated normal specimens were spiked with CRP, heparin, and recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) and followed by measurement of aPTT and anti-Xa activity. Additionally, aPTT, anti-Xa activity, FVIII, fibrinogen, and CRP were measured in 18 ECMO specimens.

RESULTS

Elevated CRP prolonged aPTT in normal specimens with or without heparin, but did not affect anti-Xa assay. In contrast, ECMO specimens showed similar aPTT and anti-Xa values regardless of CRP level. Elevated CRP in specimens was accompanied by increased fibrinogen and FVIII activity. Additional in vitro experiments confirmed that FVIII spiked simultaneously with CRP attenuated CRP-induced aPTT prolongation in heparinized specimens.

CONCLUSION

In vitro CRP-induced aPTT prolongation is not observed in pediatric ECMO samples due to concomitant FVIII increase. Discordant changes of CRP and FVIII in plasma could contribute to aPTT/anti-Xa discrepancies observed during heparin therapy in the pediatric population. The anti-Xa assay is preferable for heparin monitoring in pediatric ECMO settings.

Design and Implementation of an Anti-Factor Xa Heparin Monitoring Protocol

BACKGROUND

The VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System introduced a new nurse-driven anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) protocol for monitoring unfractionated heparin to replace the previous activated partial thromboplastin time protocol.

OBJECTIVE

To design, implement, and evaluate the efficacy of the anti-Xa monitoring protocol.

METHODS

An interdisciplinary team of providers collaborated to develop and implement a nurse-driven, facility-wide anti-factor Xa protocol for monitoring unfractionated heparin therapy. The effectiveness of this protocol was evaluated by retrospective analysis.

RESULTS

We reviewed 100 medical records for compliance with the new anti-Xa monitoring protocol. We then evaluated 178 patients whose anticoagulation was monitored with the anti-Xa assay to determine the time to therapeutic range. We found that 80% of patients receiving the anti-Xa protocol achieved therapeutic anticoagulation within 24 hours, as compared with 54% of patients receiving the activated partial thromboplastin time protocol (P < .001). Protocol conversion also yielded a decrease in blood draws, dose adjustments, and potential calculation errors.

CONCLUSIONS

Monitoring intravenous heparin therapy with the anti-Xa assay rather than activated partial thromboplastin time resulted in a shorter time to therapeutic anticoagulation, longer maintenance of therapeutic levels, and fewer laboratory tests and heparin dosage changes. We believe the current practice of monitoring heparin treatment with activated partial thromboplastin time assays should be reexamined.

Evaluation of Antifactor-Xa Heparin Assay and Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time Values in Patients on Therapeutic Continuous Infusion Unfractionated Heparin Therapy

Clinical uncertainty exists regarding which assay should be designated as the standard monitoring coagulation test for intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH). Several studies have compared the use of activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and antifactor-Xa (anti-Xa) and have come out with varying results. The correlation between these 2 tests varied, markedly from strong to weak. Some have demonstrated that monitoring with anti-Xa heparin assay leads to fewer dose adjustments, resulting in fewer laboratory tests, while others have not. In the current study, we evaluated the correlation between aPTT and anti-Xa values to guide clinical management of UFH, with the intention to develop a new correlation nomogram.

Clinical outcomes with unfractionated heparin monitored by anti-factor Xa vs. activated partial Thromboplastin time

Anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) monitoring of unfractionated heparin (UFH) is associated with less time to achieve therapeutic anticoagulation compared to the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). However, it is unknown whether clinical outcomes differ between these methods of monitoring. The aim of this research was to compare the rate of venous thrombosis and bleeding events in patients that received UFH monitored by anti-Xa compared to the aPTT. A retrospective review of electronic health records identified adult patients that received UFH given intravenously (IV) for ≥2 days, with either anti-Xa or aPTT monitoring at an academic tertiary care hospital. This was a pre/post study design conducted between January 1 to December 30, 2014 (aPTT), and January 1 to December 30, 2016 (anti-Xa). All UFH adjustments were based on institutional nomograms. The primary outcome was venous thrombosis and the secondary outcome was bleeding, both of which occurred between UFH administration and discharge from the index hospitalization. A total of 2500 patients were in the anti-Xa group and 2847 patients aPTT group. Venous thrombosis occurred in 10.2% vs 10.8% of patients in the anti-Xa and aPTT groups, respectively (P = .49). Bleeding occurred in 33.7% vs 33.6% of patients in the anti-Xa and aPTT groups, respectively (P = .94). Anti-Xa monitoring was not an independent predictor of either outcome in multivariate logistic regression analyses. Our study found no difference in clinical outcomes between anti-Xa and aPTT-based monitoring of UFH IV.

Discordant Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT) vs Anti-Xa Heparin Activity

OBJECTIVES

To determine the relationship between baseline variations in the partial thromboplastin time (PTT) and the discordance between the PTT and anti-Xa heparin activity (anti-Xa) during heparin therapy.

METHODS

The baseline PTT on heparin was determined using automated heparin neutralization with protamine (prPTT). The prPTT was used to calculate a baseline-corrected PTT on heparin to reduce discordance with anti-Xa measurements.

RESULTS

The prPTT removed up to 1 U/mL of heparin, returning baseline values for normal, factor-deficient, and lupus inhibitor plasmas. A prolonged prPTT was seen in 97 (53%) of 182 samples from heparinized patients. The heparinized PTT was discordant compared with anti-Xa in 64 (35%) of 182 samples and 43 (67%) of 64 discordant samples, and 46% of concordant samples showed a prolonged prPTT. A baseline-corrected PTT reduced discordance with anti-Xa measurements by 64%.

CONCLUSIONS

PTT/anti-Xa discordance due to baseline PTT prolongation could be reduced using a baseline-corrected PTT.

Spontaneous ilio-psoas hematomas complicating intensive care unit hospitalizations

BACKGROUND

Ilio-psoas hematoma is a potentially lethal condition that can arise during hospital stay. However, neither the incidence nor the prognosis of patients whose stay in intensive care units (ICU) is complicated by a iatrogenic ilio-psoas hematoma is known.

METHODS

A bicentric retrospective study was conducted to compile the patients who developed an ilio-psoas hematoma while they were hospitalized in ICU between January 2009 and December 2016. Their biometric characteristics, pre-existing conditions, the circumstances in which the hematoma was diagnosed, the treatments they received and their prognosis were recorded.

RESULTS

Forty patients were diagnosed with an ilio-psoas hematoma during their ICU stay. The incidence of this complication was 3.8 cases for 1000 admissions, taking into account only patients who stayed more than three days in ICU. The median age of patients was 74 years old and the median time between admission and the diagnosis of ilio-psoas hematoma was 12.6 days. A large proportion of them was obese (42.5%) and/or under dialysis (50%) prior to developing their hematoma. Ninety-five percent of the patients had heparin at prophylactic or therapeutic doses. Only 10% of them were above the therapeutic range of anticoagulation. The ICU mortality rate was of 50% following this complication (versus a general mortality rate of 22% for the patients without IPH over the same period of time). Patients with IPH that were complicated by disseminated intravascular coagulopathy had a significantly higher mortality rate than those with IPH and no disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (OR 6.91, 95% CI [1.28; 58.8], p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Age, anticoagulation, a high body mass index and dialysis seem to be risk factors of developing an ilio-psoas hematoma in ICU. Iatrogenic ilio-psoas hematomas complicated by disseminated intravascular coagulopathies are more at risk of leading to death. It is noteworthy that activated partial thromboplastin time above the therapeutic range was not a good predictor of developing a hematoma for patients who received unfractioned heparin therapy.

Agreement between activated partial thromboplastin time and anti-Xa activity in critically ill patients receiving therapeutic unfractionated heparin

BACKGROUND

No study supports the use of either aPTT or anti-Xa activity for heparin monitoring in critical care patients. There are no strong data on the agreement between aPTT and anti-Xa. The aims of this study were to: 1. Analyse the agreement between aPTT and anti-Xa in a large population of critically ill patients under unfractionated heparin therapy (UFH), 2. Identify clinical and biological factors associated to agreement or disagreement, and 3. Analyse the impact of anti-Xa availability on the use of aPTT and UFH therapy.

METHODS

Retrospective study in a 35 beds mixed-ICU population between 2006 and 2016 in a University teaching hospital.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

delivery of a UFH dose >15,000 U/24 h during at least one day with one anti-Xa determination.

DATA

demographic variables, aPTT, anti-Xa, laboratory variables, presence of extracorporeal devices (ECD). Pairs of simultaneously dosed aPTT and anti-Xa [aPTT:anti-Xa] were analysed on the basis of their agreement within the sub-therapeutic, therapeutic (aPTT 50-80″, anti-Xa 0.3-0.7 U/ml) or supra-therapeutic ranges.

RESULTS

2283 patient admissions (2085 patients) were analysed. 35,595 [aPTT:anti-Xa] pairs were found. The overall [aPTT:anti-Xa] agreement was 59.6% and lowest (54.3%) in presence of ECD compared to non-ECD patients (61.6%; p < 0.001). Sixteen demographic and biological variables were analysed and were not predictive of [aPTT:anti-Xa] agreement. No significant difference in administered UFH dose was observed after anti-Xa introduction.

CONCLUSION

In this large cohort, the [aPTT:anti-Xa] agreement is <60% and significantly lower in patients with ECD. None of the variables identified as potentially affecting the agreement were predictive. Availability of anti-Xa had neither effect on aPTT use nor on UFH-dose. These results call for a prospective study to determine the optimal UFH-therapy monitoring tool.

A cellulose-based photoacoustic sensor to measure heparin concentration and activity in human blood samples

Heparin is an indispensable drug in anticoagulation therapy but with a narrow therapeutic window, which dictates regular testing and dose adjustment. However, current monitoring tools have a long turnaround time or are operator intensive. In this work, we describe a cellulose-based photoacoustic sensor for heparin. The sensors have a turnaround time of 6 min for whole blood samples and 3 min for plasma samples regardless of heparin concentration. These sensors have a limit of detection of 0.28 U/ml heparin in human plasma and 0.29 U/ml in whole blood with a linear response (Pearson's r = 0.99) from 0 to 2 U/ml heparin in plasma and blood samples. The relative standard deviation was < 12.5% in plasma and < 17.5% in whole blood. This approach was validated with heparin-spiked whole human blood and had a linear correlation with the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) (r = 0.99). We then studied 16 sets of clinical samples-these had a linear correlation with the activated clotting time (ACT) (Pearson's r = 0.86, P < 0.0001). The photoacoustic signal was also validated against the cumulative heparin dose (Pearson's r = 0.71, P < 0.0001). This approach could have applications in bed-side heparin assays for continuous heparin monitoring.

Correlation between activated partial thromboplastin time and anti-Xa activity in patients who received low-molecular weight heparin as anticoagulation for haemodialysis

Plasma anti-Xa activity, the recommended test to monitor low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) therapy, is not readily available in many laboratories. In our clinical trials on the use of LMWH as anticoagulation for haemodialysis, a consistent prolongation of APTT in addition to the elevated anti-Xa activity was observed in the patients after LMWH administration. Hence, the paired anti-Xa activity and APTT data were re-analyzed. The APTT ratio, which was the proportional change in APTT from the baseline value after LMWH administration, was found to have a strong correlation with anti-Xa activity (coefficient of determination, R ²  = 0.72, P < 0.001). In the receiver operating characteristic analysis, the APTT ratio was also found to be an excellent predictor of therapeutic anti-Xa activity ≧0.5 IU/mL (area under curve = 0.93, P < 0.001). The sensitivity was 88% and the specificity was 83.3% when an APTT ratio ≧1.4 was used as the cut point to predict the achievement of therapeutic anti-Xa activity. Our results illustrated that APTT is a potentially useful screening test to assess the degree of anticoagulation achieved by LMWH during haemodialysis, if the testing for plasma anti-Xa activity is not available.

Accuracy, reproducibility and costs of different laboratory assays for the monitoring of unfractionated heparin in clinical practice: a prospective evaluation study and survey among Swiss institutions

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the accuracy, reproducibility and costs of different laboratory assays for the monitoring of unfractionated heparin (UFH) in clinical practice and to study test utilisation in Switzerland.

DESIGN

Prospective evaluation study and survey among Swiss hospitals and laboratories.

SETTING

Secondary care hospital in rural Switzerland (evaluation study); all Swiss hospitals and laboratories (survey).

PARTICIPANTS

All consecutive patients, monitored for treatment with UFH during two time periods, were included (May to July 2014 and January to February 2015; n=254).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Results of activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), thrombin time (TT), prothrombinase-induced clotting time (PiCT) and anti-Xa activity with respect to UFH concentration RESULTS: Spearman's correlation coefficient (r_s) with regard to anti-Xa activity was 0.68 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.75) for aPTT, 0.79 (0.69 to 0.86) for TT and 0.94 (0.93 to 0.95) for PiCT. The correlation (r_s) between anti-Xa activity and heparin concentration as determined by spiking plasma samples was 1.0 (1.0 to 1.0). The coefficient of variation was at most 5% for PiCT and anti-Xa activity (within-run as well as day-to-day variability). The total costs per test in Swiss Francs (SFr) were SFr23.40 for aPTT, SFr33.30 for TT, SFr15.70 for PiCT and SFr24.15 for anti-Xa activity. The various tests were employed in Swiss institutions with the following frequencies: aPTT 53.2%, TT 21.6%, anti-Xa activity 7.2%, PiCT 1.4%; 16.6% of hospitals performed more than one test.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy and reproducibility of PiCT and anti-Xa activity for monitoring of UFH was superior, and analytical costs were equivalent to or lower than aPTT and TT.

Thrombodynamics, a new global coagulation test: Measurement of heparin efficiency

The actual coagulation status may be reliably measured using only highly sensitive global functional tests; however, they are not numerous and all of them have disadvantages. Thrombodynamics (TD), a novel global coagulation test, is sensitive to hypo- and hypercoagulable states. The main properties of this test were investigated, and its capabilities for hemostasis analysis were verified through pharmacodynamic monitoring of the most widely used anticoagulants, heparins. The anticoagulant effects in the plasma of donors (n = 20) and patients after hip replacement (n = 20) spiked with unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin were measured in vitro to eliminate the influence of pharmacokinetic factors. Sensitivity for heparins was compared for activated partial thromboplastin time, thrombin generation tests and TD. TD was shown to reliably characterize the pharmacodynamics of any heparin in the entire range of its prophylactic and therapeutic concentrations. Inter-individual variability for the anticoagulant action of heparins was also calculated using the TD data. This variability did not differ between the investigated groups and did not exceed 12% and 20% for the stationary clot growth rate in the presence of unfractionated heparin and enoxaparin, respectively. That finding was in accordance with the values determined earlier using the thrombin generation test. The study results showed that TD has advantages over the other global methods of coagulation analysis. These advantages are good standardization, high reproducibility, independence of the parameter values from patient age and gender, and a narrower parameter distribution in a normal population. These results indicate that TD is a promising universal assessment method that improves the quality of hemostasis analysis because it more reliably detects deviations from the parameters' reference values.

Performance of Anti-Factor Xa Versus Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time for Heparin Monitoring Using Multiple Nomograms

The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of anti-factor Xa concentration versus activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) monitoring with multiple indication-specific heparin nomograms. This was a prospective, nonrandomized study with historical control at a large academic medical center. A total of 201 patients who received intravenous heparin in the cardiology units were included. The prospective cohort included patients (n = 101) with anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) monitoring, and the historical control group included patients (n = 100) who had aPTT monitoring. Patients in the prospective group had both anti-Xa and aPTT samples drawn, but anti-Xa was used for dosing adjustment. The anti-Xa cohort achieved a significantly faster time to therapeutic range (P < .01) and required fewer dose adjustments per 24-hour period compared to the aPTT control (P = .01). Results were consistent across heparin nomograms. The overall discordance rate between the 2 tests was 49%. No significant differences in clinical outcomes were observed. In summary, anti-Xa monitoring improved the time to therapeutic anticoagulation and led to fewer dose adjustments compared to the aPTT with multiple indication-based heparin nomograms.

Therapeutic monitoring of unfractionated heparin - trials and tribulations

INTRODUCTION

Heparin is one of the oldest biological medicines with an established role in prevention and treatment of arterial and venous thromboembolism. Published therapeutic ranges for unfractionated heparin (UFH) mostly precede the large increase in the number of activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) reagent/instrument combinations that now show wide variability. Areas covered: This paper explores the use of UFH, the development of heparin therapeutic ranges (HTRs), and the strengths and limitations of the methods used to monitor heparin's anticoagulant effect. Expert commentary: Despite longstanding use of UFH for management of thromboembolic conditions, the optimal test for monitoring UFH remains undetermined. Although used extensively for monitoring UFH, routine APTT-derived HTRs are based on limited science that may have little relevance to current laboratory practice. Anti-FXa levels may provide better and more reliable HTRs; however, even these levels show considerable inter-laboratory variation, and there are insufficient clinical studies proving improved clinical efficacy. Alternative tests for monitoring UFH reported over time have not been proven effective nor feasible, secondary to technical or cost issues, or lack of general adoption. Thus, despite limited evidence of clinical utility, an uncomfortable marriage of convenience represented by heparin laboratory monitoring is unlikely to be terminated in the immediate future.

Description and Evaluation of the Implementation of a Weight-Based, Nurse-Driven Heparin Nomogram in a Tertiary Academic Medical Center

Weight-based, nurse-driven heparin nomograms are reported in the medical literature to improve the time it takes to reach a minimum threshold for anticoagulation without compromising patient safety in specific indications or patient populations. This is the first report in the literature of an institution-wide protocol implementation and evaluation of effectiveness with simultaneous transition to an electronic health record. The purpose of implementing this practice change at our institution was to standardize practice, improve time to reach therapeutic anticoagulation, and improve patient safety. We conducted a retrospective analysis utilizing a pre/postimplementation design to compare outcomes. The primary end point evaluated was the time to reach minimum threshold value for therapeutic anticoagulation. Additionally, we assessed the percentage of patients who reached minimum threshold therapeutic anticoagulation within 24 hours, the percentage of patients with a critically supratherapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) value (≥120 seconds) during therapy, and a description of heparin titration for the first 4 aPTT results with nomogram use. Overall time to therapeutic anticoagulation decreased from a mean 18.7 to 11.7 hours (hazard ratio [HR] 1.59; 95% confidence interval 1.22-2.08; P < .0005). Percentage of patients receiving therapeutic anticoagulation within 24 hours increased from 74.4 to 88.5 (odds ratio [OR 2.97, P = .002) and the percentage of patients with an aPTT ≥120 seconds remained constant at 49.9 versus 46.8 (OR 0.92, P = .73). This practice change reduced time to therapeutic anticoagulation without an increase in the proportion of patients with a critically supratherapeutic aPTT at our institution.

Should we abandon the APTT for monitoring unfractionated heparin?

INTRODUCTION

The activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) is commonly used to monitor unfractionated heparin (UFH) but may not accurately measure the amount of heparin present. The anti-Xa assay is less susceptible to confounding factors and may be a better assay for this purpose.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The validity of the APTT for monitoring UFH was assessed by comparing with an anti-Xa assay on 3543 samples from 475 patients (infants [n=165], children 1-15years [n=60] and adults [n=250]) receiving treatment dose UFH.

RESULTS

Overall concordance was poor. The highest concordance (66%; 168/254) was seen in children. Concordance (51.8%) or discordance (48.4%) was almost equal in adult patients. Among adult patients whose anti-Xa level was within 0.3-0.7IU/mL, only 38% had an APTT in the therapeutic range whilst 56% were below and 6% were above therapeutic range. Children and adult patients with anti-Xa of 0.3-0.7IU/mL but sub- therapeutic APTT had significantly higher fibrinogen levels compared to those with therapeutic or supra-therapeutic APTT.

CONCLUSIONS

When the anti-Xa level was 0.3-0.7IU/mL, the majority of samples from infants demonstrated a supra-therapeutic APTT, whilst adults tended to have a sub-therapeutic APTT. This may lead to under anticoagulation in infants or over anticoagulation in adults with risk of bleeding if APTT is used to monitor UFH. These results further strengthen existing evidence of the limitation of APTT in monitoring UFH. Discordance of APTT and anti-Xa level in adults and children may be due to elevation of fibrinogen level.