A Case of Moderate Sprue-Like Enteropathy Associated With Telmisartan

Systematic review: Clinical phenotypes, histopathological features and prognosis of enteropathy due to angiotensin II receptor blockers

BACKGROUND

Although enteropathy due to angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) has been known for over 10 years, clinicians' awareness of this condition is still low.

AIMS

To systematically review the literature about clinical phenotypes, distribution of mucosal changes throughout the gastrointestinal tract and prognosis of enteropathy due to ARBs.

METHODS

According to PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed and Embase for relevant articles up to November 6, 2023. We included full-text papers, letters, case reports and case series describing enteropathy due to ARBs. Patients were classified into subgroups based on endoscopic and histological findings of different regions of the gastrointestinal tract. The protocol was registered with Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/TK67C).

RESULTS

We included 94 articles reporting 183 cases (101 female, mean age at diagnosis 69 ± 10 years). The clinical picture at diagnosis was characterised by severe diarrhoea (97%) and weight loss (84%, median -13 kg), leading to hospital admission in 167 (95%) patients. Olmesartan (90%) was most frequently implicated. Villous atrophy (VA) was reported in 164/183 (89%) patients. One hundred and nine had only VA, 12 had pan-gastrointestinal involvement, 23 had VA and gastric involvement and 19 had VA and colon involvement (predominantly microscopic colitis). Outcomes were reported for 178/183 (97%) patients, who all recovered clinically on ARBs withdrawal. Histological recovery occurred in all 96 patients with VA at baseline who underwent follow-up duodenal biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

Enteropathy due to ARBs is characterised by severe malabsorption often requiring hospital admission and can involve the entire gastrointestinal tract. Clinician awareness can lead to prompt diagnosis and excellent prognosis.

Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) and manufacturing contamination: A retrospective National Register Study into suspected associated adverse drug reactions

AIMS

The aim of this study was to determine if any suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) observed with the use of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) could be linked to either (a) their unique respective physicochemical and pharmacological profiles and (b) the recently disclosed suspected carcinogenic manufacturing contaminants found in certain sartan drug class batches.

METHODS

The pharmacology profiles of ARBs were data-mined from the Chemical Database of bioactive molecules with drug-like properties, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (ChEMBL). Suspected ADR data (from 01/2016-10/2022, inclusive) and prescribing rates of ARBs over a 5-year prescribing window (from 09/2016 to 08/2021, inclusive) were obtained via analysis of the United Kingdom Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Authority (MHRA) Yellow Card drug analysis profile and Open prescribing databases, respectively.

RESULTS

The overall suspected ADRs and fatalities per 100 000 prescriptions identified across the ARBs studied were found to be different between the sartan drug class members (chi-squared test, P < .05). There is a greater relative rate of reports for valsartan across all investigated organ classes of ADRs, than other ARBs, despite valsartan's more limited pharmacological profile and similar physicochemical properties to other sartans. The disparity in ADR reporting rates with valsartan vs other ARBs could be due to the dissimilarity in formulation excipients, patient factors and publicity surrounding batch contaminations, amongst others. Cancer-related ADRs and fatalities per 100 000 prescriptions identified across the ARBs studied are not statistically significant (chi-squared test, P > .05) based on the datasets used over the 5-year period.

CONCLUSION

No connection between ARB pharmacology and their suspected ADRs could be found. No conclusion between sartan batch contaminations and increased suspected cancer-related ADRs was found.

Sprue-Like Enteropathy and Liver Injury: A Rare Emerging Association with Olmesartan

Olmesartan-induced enteropathy is an underreported phenomenon, first described in 2012. While olmesartan's antihypertensive properties were confirmed early on, its association with a sprue-like enteropathy was subsequently noted. Although this association has been reported with olmesartan, there have been few reports of this association with other angiotensin-receptor blockers. We present a case of a 79-year-old male who presented with diarrhea, weight loss, jaundice, and transaminitis. Further history revealed that he had been taking olmesartan 40 mg daily for hypertension. Workup of his diarrhea and jaundice included duodenal and liver biopsies revealed findings consistent with a sprue-like enteropathy and an autoimmune hepatitis-like pattern. On discontinuation of olmesartan, his 1-month follow-up revealed significant improvement in his clinical status as well as his liver function tests. Olmesartan is an effective antihypertensive medication; however, physicians must be mindful of its side effect of causing a sprue-like enteropathy and liver injury. Patients should be counseled on discontinuing olmesartan, and they should be started on an alternative therapy for hypertension.

Gastrointestinal Manifestations in Systemic Mastocytosis: The Need of a Multidisciplinary Approach

Simple Summary

Mastocytosis is a group of neoplastic mast cell disorders ranging from a skin-limited disease to a systemic form with multi-organ involvement, including gut involvement. Clinical manifestations and outcome of systemic mastocytosis are variable. Symptoms may result from either release of mast cell mediators or tissue infiltration by mast cell proliferation. Gastrointestinal symptoms are one of the major causes of morbidity in these patients. The diagnosis of gastrointestinal mastocytosis can be tricky, as symptoms often mimic other more common gastrointestinal diseases; the endoscopic appearance is often unremarkable or nonspecific and the infiltrate can be focal and subtle and easily missed unless special stains are used. This review aims to better define the gastrointestinal involvement in systemic mastocytosis, discussing potential diagnostic pitfalls and pointing out the importance of a multidisciplinary approach for a prompt diagnosis and treatment.

Abstract

Mastocytosis represents a heterogeneous group of neoplastic mast cell disorders. The basic classification into a skin-limited disease and a systemic form with multi-organ involvement remains valid. Systemic mastocytosis is a disease often hard to diagnose, characterized by different symptoms originating from either the release of mast cell mediators or organ damage due to mast cell infiltration. Gastrointestinal symptoms represent one of the major causes of morbidity, being present in 60–80% of patients. A high index of suspicion by clinicians and pathologists is required to reach the diagnosis. Gastrointestinal mastocytosis can be a challenging diagnosis, as symptoms simulate other more common gastrointestinal diseases. The endoscopic appearance is generally unremarkable or nonspecific and gastrointestinal mast cell infiltration can be focal and subtle, requiring an adequate sampling with multiple biopsies by the endoscopists. Special stains, such as CD117, tryptase, and CD25, should be performed in order not to miss the gastrointestinal mast cell infiltrate. A proper patient’s workup requires a multidisciplinary approach including gastroenterologists, endoscopists, hematologists, oncologists, and pathologists. The aim of this review is to analyze the clinicopathological features of gastrointestinal involvement in systemic mastocytosis, focusing on the relevance of a multidisciplinary approach.

Coeliac disease enteropathy and symptoms may be aggravated by angiotensin receptor blockers in patients on a gluten-free diet

Background

Angiotensin receptor blocker‐associated enteropathy (ARB‐e) is an increasingly recognised clinical entity with symptoms and histological findings identical to coeliac disease (CD). There is evidence to suggest immune‐mediated mucosal injury in ARB‐e with a high prevalence of DQ2/DQ8; however, as IgA anti‐tissue transglutaminase (anti‐TTG) is usually negative, an insult other than TTG‐mediated injury is suspected. The impact of ARBs on disease activity in patients with CD is not known.

Objective

To assess the effect of ARB exposure on patients with established CD.

Methods

A patient record search of 1142 individual patients attending a dedicated coeliac clinic from 2010 to the present identified 59 patients treated with ARB. Those with CD confirmed by serology (TTG + ve/EMA + ve) and histopathology (Marsh criteria) were included (n = 40, 0.52%). Data collected included disease duration, compliance with gluten‐free diet (GFD), reported symptoms (diarrhoea, weight loss and abdominal pain), surrogate markers of absorption (Vitamin D, Iron, Calcium and Haemoglobin), in addition to anti‐TTG titre and histological grade at last follow up. Patients were age and sex‐matched in a 1:2 ratio with CD patients not taking ARBs (controls), with comparable rates of disease duration and compliance with GFD.

Results

The ARB and control groups were matched in terms of age (mean 66.2 years) and gender (female 63%). Strict compliance with GFD was reported in 55% and 56%, respectively. Persistent symptoms were reported in 10/40 (25%) of the ARB group compared with 7/82 (9%) of controls (p = 0.0181). There were lower rates of mucosal healing (Marsh grade 0) in the ARB group (36% n = 11) compared to controls (55%, n = 33). There was no significant difference in anti‐TTG titres. Surrogate markers of absorption were comparable across the groups, except for Vitamin D which was lower in those taking olmesartan (p = 0.0015).

Conclusions

ARBs may aggravate the enteropathy and lead to increased symptoms in patients with bone fide diagnosed CD following a GFD.

Summarise the estabished knowledge on this subject

Angiotensin receptor blocker‐associated enteropathy (ARB‐e) is an increasingly recognised clinical entity with symptoms and histological findings identical to coeliac disease (CD).

The exact cause of mucosal injury in ARB‐e is unknown however there is evidence to suggest immune‐mediated mucosal injury in ARB‐e with a high prevalence of DQ2/DQ8, however as anti‐tissue transglutaminase (TTG) is usually negative, an insult other than TTG‐mediated injury is suspected. The impact of ARBs on disease activity in patients with CD is not known.

What are the significance and/or new findins of this study?

Coeliac patients who take ARBs are more likely to have persistent symptoms and lower rates of mucosal healing than their age‐matched coeliac controls. This observation appears to be independent of TTG mediated injury, akin to that reported in non‐coeliac populations.

ARB use in patients with established coeliac disease may confound the interpretation of clinical and histological response to a gluten‐free diet.

Indolent T-Cell Lymphoproliferative Disorders of the Gastrointestinal Tract (iTLPD-GI): A Review

Simple Summary

This review aims to better define the clinical, pathological, and molecular features of the novel lymphoproliferative disease termed “indolent T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder of the gastro-intestinal tract (iTLPD-GI)”, to discuss potential pitfalls in differentiating this entity from other neoplastic and non-neoplastic disorders arising at the same site, and to point out a biomarker-based approach to the diagnosis.

Abstract

iTLPD-GI is a low-grade clonal T-cell lymphoproliferative disease arising in GI organs. It is an uncommon disease, and only recently has it been enlisted as a distinct provisional entity in the current WHO Classification. Data from the literature disclose high heterogeneity in terms of pathological and molecular features; on the other hand, establishing an accurate diagnosis of iTLPD-GI is of pivotal importance, since treatment options are different from that of other, more frequent lymphomas that arise in the gastrointestinal tract. In this review, we aimed to better define this novel entity, and to identify useful diagnostic biomarkers; moreover, we provide a biomarker-based approach to the diagnosis and describe the most common issues in differentiating iTLPD-GI from other neoplastic and non-neoplastic disorders.

Telmisartan-induced sprue-like enteropathy: a case report

A possible case of sprue-like enteropathy (SLE) induced by the use of telmisartan is reported. Telmisartan is an angiotensin-receptor II blocker (type 1) used for the treatment of hypertension. Several cases of SLE associated with olmesartan and other drugs of the same group have been reported. In all cases, SLE resolved following therapy withdrawal. We describe the case of an 80-year-old woman who presented with diarrhoea and abdominal pain. In the past 5 years she had been treated with telmisartan 40 mg once a day for hypertension, so we hypothesised that symptoms might be caused by telmisartan. After treatment discontinuation, diarrhoea disappeared. Three causality algorithms were applied and revealed a possible or likely causal relationship. At present, the patient remains asymptomatic. There is a causal relationship between the use of telmisartan and SLE. This association should be taken into account by physicians when prescribing and reviewing drug therapies.

Significant Weight Loss in a Patient Taking Olmesartan: An Unusual Case Report

Objective:

Olmesartan-induced enteropathy consists a syndrome that mimics celiac disease both clinically and histologically. Cases of this entity have sporadically been reported since 2012 and are usually characterized by severe diarrhea and malabsorption, followed by significant weight loss.

Case Report:

Herein, we report an uncommon case of this syndrome, where weight loss preceded several months the onset of gastrointestinal symptoms.

Discussion and Conclusion:

Physicians should be aware of unexplained weight loss in patients taking olmesartan, as prompt discontinuation of the drug may prevent the deleterious consequences of malabsorption.

Angiotensin II receptor blockers and gastrointestinal adverse events of resembling sprue-like enteropathy: a systematic review

Background

Olmesartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), is associated with gastrointestinal symptoms resembling sprue-like enteropathy. Some have proposed that enteropathy may be a class effect rather than olmesartan-specific. We performed a systematic review to identify literature of sprue-like enteropathy for all ARBs.

Methods

Case reports, case series and comparative studies of ARBs were searched on PubMed and Embase databases through 21 November 2018 and then assessed.

Results

A total of 82 case reports and case series as well as 5 comparative studies, including 248 cases, were selected and analysed. The ARBs listed in the case reports were olmesartan (233 users; 94.0%), telmisartan (5 users; 2.0%), irbesartan (4 users; 1.6%), valsartan (3 users; 1.2%), losartan (2 users; 0.8%) and eprosartan (1 user; 0.4%). The periods between ARB initiation and onset of symptoms ranged from 2 weeks to 13 years. Histologic results were reported in 218 cases, in which 201 cases (92.2%) were villous atrophy and 131 cases (60.1%) were intraepithelial lymphocytosis. Human leucocyte antigen (HLA) testing was performed in 147 patients, among whom 105 (71.4%) had HLA-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8 haplotypes. Celiac-associated antibodies were tested in 169 patients, among whom 167 (98.8%) showed negative results. Gluten exclusion from the diet failed to relieve symptoms of enteropathy in 127 (97.7%) of 130 patients with information. Complete remission of symptoms after discontinuation of ARB was reported in 233 (97.4%) of the 239 patients with information. Seven cases (2.8%) reported recurrence of symptoms after restarting olmesartan; rechallenge was not reported for the non-olmesartan ARBs. The retrospective studies conducted worldwide had inconsistent study designs (e.g. differences in periods of study and case definition) and findings.

Conclusions

Although enteropathy is rare, clinicians should remain vigilant of this potential adverse event even years after medication initiation.

Management of celiac disease in daily clinical practice

Celiac disease (CD) is the most common autoimmune enteropathy worldwide. In CD, dietary gluten triggers a T cell driven small intestinal inflammation in a subset of genetically predisposed subjects, expressing the HLA DQ2 and/or DQ8 genes on their antigen presenting cells. HLA DQ2/DQ8 can bind gluten peptides after their prior modification by the CD autoantigen, tissue transglutaminase (TG2). This process leads to the activation of gluten reactive T cells, small bowel villous atrophy, crypt hyperplasia and intraepithelial lymphocytosis, the histological hallmarks of CD. The clinical picture of CD is extremely heterogeneous including intestinal (especially diarrhea, abdominal pain, bloating) and extraintestinal (especially associated autoimmune diseases, anemia, osteoporosis) manifestations. The prevalence of CD in most parts of the world is estimated at 1:100-1:150 and its diagnosis is based on the presence of circulating autoantibodies (anti-TG2) and the histological detection of villous atrophy. Treatment is a lifelong gluten free diet but adjunctive therapies are in development. Although CD is a well-characterized disease, it is grossly underdiagnosed, despite the severe consequences of long-term gluten ingestion in CD, such as enhanced autoimmunity, refractory CD and intestinal T cell lymphoma. The aim of the presented review is to provide a clinical guide and to summarize the most recent clinical progress in CD research.

Olmesartan Associated Enteropathy: A Rare Underdiagnosed Cause of Diarrhea and Weight Loss

BACKGROUND Olmesartan, an angiotensin receptor blockade class of antihypertensive medication has recently been associated with a seronegative sprue like enteropathy. Patients typically present with diarrhea and weight loss often prompting exhaustive diagnostic workup. Discontinuation of the drug leads to dramatic recovery and hence, physicians need to be aware of olmesartan associated enteropathy (OAE) in order to avoid unnecessary testing. CASE REPORT A 59-year-old Caucasian male was admitted to the hospital with complaints of intractable diarrhea, vomiting and considerable weight loss. Medical history was notable for hypertension being treated with olmesartan. Workup for all potential infectious causes and celiac disease was negative. Eventually, a colonoscopy was performed due to his persistent symptoms and biopsy revealed lymphocytic colitis. An upper endoscopy was also performed, and histopathology of the duodenum revealed total villous blunting. In light of negative serology for celiac disease and after a detailed review of the patient's medications, the possibility of olmesartan induced enteropathy was considered. Olmesartan was stopped and his symptoms resolved. A follow-up endoscopy done a few months later showed normal small bowel mucosa. CONCLUSIONS This case demonstrates the need for a thorough medication review by healthcare providers especially after a full workup for the patient's symptoms has already been performed. It also reiterates that having an awareness of rare side effects of common medications mitigates the need for extensive diagnostic testing.