Health Literacy and Clear Bedside Communication: A Curricular Intervention for Internal Medicine Physicians and Medicine Nurses

Health literacy continuing education courses and tools for healthcare professionals: A scoping review

Strengthening the health literacy (HL) skills of the healthcare users is a multicomponent process involving the users, the healthcare professionals, the stakeholders, and the environment. Health organizations, universities, private initiatives, and funded projects focused on developing and implementing continuing education courses target at increasing healthcare professionals' HL. This scoping review aimed at reporting the HL continuing education courses for healthcare professionals to enhance their knowledge and skills in identifying and supporting healthcare users with limited HL, and particularly, older people. This review followed the five stages by Arksey and O'Malley framework and the guidelines by Joanna Briggs Institute for scoping reviews. Peer-reviewed papers and gray literature published between years 2000 to 2020 were included in this bibliometric search utilizing four electronic databases (PUBMED, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PSYCHINFO, and Opengrey). Twenty-seven (27) papers met the criteria, including twenty-one (21) full-texts and six (6) other records (website contents, eLearning, and funded projects). There is a lack of HL tools that address the training needs of healthcare professionals working with older adults. Tailored HL tools could benefit healthcare professionals' clinical work by improving their communication with older adults.

Improving Nurse-Physician Bedside Communication Using a Patient Experience Quality Improvement Pilot Project at an Academic Medical Center

Introduction  Patient experience is a crucial aspect of healthcare delivery, and it encompasses various elements that contribute to a patient's perception of the care they receive. Patient satisfaction and patient experience are related but distinct concepts. Patient experience focuses on whether specific aspects of care occurred, while patient satisfaction gauges whether patient expectations were met. It goes beyond mere satisfaction and delves into the broader aspects of how patients interact with the healthcare system and the quality of those interactions, with health plans, doctors, nurses, and staff in various healthcare facilities. Other aspects highly valued by patients include elements such as timely access to care and information, good communication with the healthcare team, and friendly staff. Patient experience can influence both the healthcare and financial outcomes of healthcare facilities. It is well understood that positive patient experiences may lead to better care adherence, improved clinical outcomes, enhanced patient safety, and better care coordination. Payers, both public and private, have recognized the importance of patient experience. Improving patient experience benefits healthcare facilities financially by strengthening customer loyalty, building a positive reputation, increasing referrals, and reducing medical malpractice risk and staff turnover.  Methodology A multidisciplinary retrospective quality improvement initiative was initiated to effectively improve nurse-physician communication and organizational outcomes in several hospital units. Results Using an innovative staff-developed and driven acronym, IMOMW (I'm on my way), the study demonstrated significant positive outcomes such as increased Epic documentation (Epic Systems Corporation, Verona, Wisconsin, United States) of physician and nursing rounding by 13%, a 10.5% rise in recommend facility net promoter score (NPS) patient experience survey scores, 13.4% increase in physician and nurse team communication, 5.4% increase in nursing communication, and a 5.3% increase in physician communication. Moreover, pilot units outperformed the control group consisting of medical-surgical units located in newer portions of the hospital. Conclusion This quality improvement study demonstrates improved interdisciplinary nurse-physician communication, Epic documentation, and patient experience scores. Further investigation is necessary to better understand the specific factors and/or processes that influence the sustainability of interventions that improve nurse-physician communication and patient experience.

Facilitators and barriers to pressure injury prevention, management and education: Perspectives from healthcare professionals-A qualitative study

This study aims to (1) characterize healthcare professionals' (HCPs') experiences related to the prevention and management of pressure injuries (PIs) and (2) explore the educational needs of individuals with a past or current history of PIs and their caregivers from the perspective of HCPs. This is a qualitative descriptive study. HCPs (n = 18) were interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and coded using NVivo. Three overarching themes encompassing various dimensions were identified: (1) Facilitators related to PI prevention and management, (2) Challenges related to PI prevention and management and (3) Recommendations for improving patient and caregiver PI education. HCPs identified a greater number of challenges than facilitators related to PI care. This study emphasizes the importance of a patient-centred and interprofessional approach to patient education for PI prevention and management. Meaningful interventions focused on the patient may improve health literacy and empower patients and caregivers in PI care. Investing in preventive measures and raising awareness are crucial to reducing PI incidence. The findings have implications for HCPs and researchers seeking to enhance patient care and promote effective PI prevention strategies.

An innovative approach to comprehensive communication skills training for residents: A resident-led communication curriculum

Innovations to enhance residency training in interpersonal and communication skills are needed and a resident-led strategy has not been well-described. In this study, we explored a resident-led comprehensive communication skills curriculum for internal medicine residents. Residents and faculty prepared the curriculum as part of an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Back to Bedside Project and with "The language of caring guide for physicians." Employing active learning techniques, three residents led 43 internal medicine residents in seven 1 h sessions from 2019 to 2020. Using a 35-question survey, we assessed pre and post self-reported competence in: mindful practice, collaboration and teamwork, effective openings and closing, communicating with empathy, effective explanations, engaging patients and families as partners, and hard conversations. A Wilcoxon signed rank test was employed to explore differences in median scores after matching each person's pretest and posttest score. The median score for aggregate communication and the scores for all seven competencies assessed improved from pre to post (p < 0.05). This indicates that residents reported higher incidences of performing patient-centered communication skills after the curriculum compared to before. Using a five-point Likert scale, 100% of participants agreed the program improved their communication skills and improved confidence in bedside patient-centered communications. A resident-led comprehensive communication skills curriculum for internal medicine residents was implemented showing improvement in skills over the course of the curriculum. The curriculum was well-accepted by post-survey evaluation and was feasible with motivated resident-leaders, use of an existing guide to communication, and reserved didactic time to implement the program.

Factors associated with assistive technology prescription and acceptance in motor neurone disease

PURPOSE

The risk of delaying assistive technology (AT) prescription and implementation has significant implications on the safety and quality of life of people with Motor Neurone Disease (PwMND). This study aims to explore the barriers and enablers of AT prescription and implementation identified by PwMND and clinicians.

METHODS

A qualitative study using semi-structured focus groups with clinicians and in-depth interviews with PwMND. Sixteen clinicians and ten PwMND were recruited. Thematic analysis was completed and results were compared and discussed to reach an agreement on the final themes.

RESULTS

Three main factors were identified - PwMND, Clinician and Extrapersonal. For PwMND, personal characteristics, such as mindset, was the strongest enabler and inability to accept diagnosis and AT was the key barrier. For Clinician, communication approach was both the most identified enabler and barrier. For Extrapersonal, the availability of interactive education of AT was the strongest enabler and long wait time was a significant barrier.

CONCLUSION

Our study identified themes that clinicians could have an impact on, such as, providing interactive education, engaging PwMND and their support network, and ongoing upskilling of clinicians working in this field. Themes identified that were beyond the control of clinicians were personal characteristics, acceptance and support networks. It highlights the importance for clinicians to be flexible with their communication approach to accommodate the needs of PwMND in the acceptance of AT.

Health literacy profiles of medical students in an Australian Doctor of Medicine programme: A cross-sectional study using the Health Literacy Questionnaire

ISSUE ADDRESSED

With the emerging focus on designing health-literate organisations and health care systems, it is essential to understand the health literacy profiles of the medical workforce including medical students, as medical professionals play a key role in within these systems. Medical professionals contribute to good patient health outcomes through enabling access to appropriate health care, provision of quality health information and collaborative shared decision-making, which are fundamental health literacy competencies. The aim of this study is to identify health literacy strengths and weaknesses of medical students enrolled in an Australian Doctor of Medicine programme.

METHODS

Students from all 4 years of an Australian Doctor of Medicine programme were invited to complete an anonymous, online survey in January 2021. Health literacy profiles were identified using the 9-domain, 44-item multi-dimensional Health Literacy Questionnaire, a validated tool which comprehensively evaluates health literacy strengths and weaknesses from diverse perspectives. Demographic characteristics and social attributes were also recorded. The results were compared with Australian Bureau of Statistics data.

RESULTS

Eighty-six participants completed the survey. Most participants were female students (57%) who spoke English at home (88%) with tertiary-educated fathers (60%) and resided in locations associated with high socioeconomic status during adolescence (61%). Males scored significantly higher in three domains which explored health information access and appraisal, and ability to actively engage with health care providers. Students' scores were significantly lower than the Australian general population in Domain 6 (Ability to actively engage with health care providers) and Domain 7 (Navigating the health care system).

CONCLUSIONS

Medical students' health literacy profiles indicate areas of weakness in their ability to engage with health care providers and to navigate the health system. Medical educators will need to create opportunities to address these weaknesses within medical curricula. Gender differences identified in self-rated ability to access and appraise health information requires further exploration. SO WHAT?: Further understanding of health literacy profiles of medical students may influence design of medical school curricula.

Predicted Health Literacy Disparities Between Immigrant and US-Born Racial/Ethnic Minorities: a Nationwide Study

BACKGROUND

Racial/ethnic minorities in the USA exhibit reduced health literacy (HL) proficiency, leading to increased health disparities. It is unclear how the effect of birth status (immigrant/US-born) affects HL proficiency among racial/ethnic minorities.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the direct, indirect, and total effects of birth status on HL proficiency among a nationally representative population of racial/ethnic minority adults in the USA.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study of 2019 data from the Medial Expenditure Panel Survey.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants aged 18 or older reporting as racial/ethnic minorities (Black, Asian, or Hispanic) with non-missing data.

MAIN MEASURES

We predicted HL proficiency for each participant using a previously published model. Path analysis was used to estimate the direct, indirect, and total effects of birth status on HL proficiency, accounting for several other covariates. Prevalence ratios were estimated using adjusted Poisson regression to evaluate differences in the "Below Basic" HL category.

KEY RESULTS

An estimated weighted 81,092,505 participants were included (57.5% US-born, 42.5% immigrant). More racial/ethnic minority immigrant participants fell into the lowest category of HL proficiency, "Below Basic" (14.3% vs 5.5%, p < 0.05). Results of the path analysis indicated a significant, negative direct effect of birth status on HL proficiency (standardized coefficient = - 0.24, SE = 0.01, 95%CI: - 0.26, - 0.23) in addition to an indirect effect mediated through insurance status, health-system resource use, and English proficiency. The total effect of birth status on HL proficiency was found to be - 0.29. The immigrant participant group had 81% higher prevalence of falling into the "Below Basic" HL category compared to US-born participants (prevalence ratio = 1.81, 95%CI: 1.52, 2.16).

CONCLUSIONS

Immigrant status has a strong, negative, direct effect on HL proficiency among racial/ethnic minorities in the USA. This may be a result of barriers that prevent equitable access to resources that improve proper HL proficiency. US policymakers may consider several methods to reduce this disparity at the health-system-, provider-, and patient-levels.

How to say "I don't know": development and evaluation of workshops for medical students and surgical residents on communicating uncertainty using the ADAPT framework

Purpose

Uncertainty, or the conscious awareness of having doubts, is pervasive in medicine, from differential diagnoses and the sensitivity of diagnostic tests, to the absence of a single known recovery path. While openness about uncertainty is necessary for shared decision-making and is a pillar of patient-centered care, it is a challenge to do so while preserving patient confidence. The authors' aim was to develop, pilot, and evaluate an uncertainty communication curriculum to prepare medical students and residents to confidently navigate such conversations.

Methods

The authors developed ADAPT, a mnemonic framework to improve student comprehension and recall of the important steps in uncertainty disclosure: assess the patient's knowledge, disclose uncertainty directly, acknowledge patient emotions, plan next steps, and temper expectations. Using this framework, the authors developed, piloted, and evaluated an uncertainty communications course as part of an ongoing communication curriculum for second year medical students in 2020 and with surgical residents in 2021.

Results

Learner confidence in uncertainty communication skills significantly increased post-class. Resident confidence in disclosing uncertainty was significantly correlated with observer ratings of their related communication skills during simulation. Students expressed positive experiences of the class, noting particular appreciation for the outline of steps included in the ADAPT framework, and the ability to observe a demonstration prior to practice.

Conclusions

The ADAPT communication curriculum was effective at increasing learner confidence and performance in communicating uncertainty. More rigorous evaluation of the ADAPT protocol will be important in confirming its generalizability.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44186-022-00075-4.

Implementation of health literacy training for clinicians in a federally qualified health center

Objective

The objective of this quality improvement project was to evaluate the effectiveness of a succinct health literacy training for providers at a demanding federally qualified health center.

Methods

One group, pretest-posttest design was used to measure for a change in knowledge regarding the effects of limited health literacy, a change in self-reported measure of routine screening for limited health literacy and a change in self-reported utilization of patient-centered communication techniques.

Results

The average percentage of correct responses on the Health Literacy Knowledge Check showed significant improvement from 23.6% (SD = 18.1%) to 63.9% (SD = 25.3%), p < .001. There were no significant changes in median responses at pre- and post-intervention for self-reported use of screening and communication techniques (all p > .05).

Conclusion

This brief training was effective at improving participants' knowledge of health literacy but did not improve use of recommended communication techniques or screening for health literacy. The results suggest that emphasizing a universal precautions approach to health literacy may be more effective with participants who work in high-volume clinics.

Practice implications

For high-volume clinics, a brief training may improve participants' knowledge but does not increase use of actual communication techniques based on self-report.

A Pediatric Resident Curriculum for the Use of Health Literacy Communication Tools

Background:

Objective:

Methods:

Key Results:

Conclusions:

Plain Language Summary:

Health Literacy-Sensitive Counselling on Early Childhood Allergy Prevention: Results of a Qualitative Study on German Midwives' Perspectives

In Germany, midwives are involved in extensive antenatal and postnatal care. As health professionals, they can play a key role in strengthening health literacy (HL) of parents on how to prevent chronic allergic diseases in their children. The objective of this study is to explore midwives' perspectives regarding HL-sensitive counselling in early childhood allergy prevention (ECAP). Twenty-four qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with midwives, and data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Only a small number of study participants were aware of HL as a concept. However, most of these use screening and counselling strategies which consider individual information needs and which support parental HL. HL sensitivity in counselling is largely based on the midwives' "gut feelings" and counselling experience, rather than on formal education. The midwives were largely aware of evidence-based ECAP recommendations; however, allergy prevention was not seen as a stand-alone topic but as part of their general counselling on infant feeding and hygiene. They found parents to be more open to receiving complex prevention information during antenatal counselling. In order to strengthen midwives' roles in HL-sensitive ECAP counselling, their formal education should provide them with explicit HL knowledge and counselling skills. ECAP should be an inherent part of antenatal care.

Effectiveness of innovative instructional module for professional competence in health literacy in medical students

BACKGROUND

Physicians should be equipped with professional competence in health literacy to communicate more effectively with patients with limited health literacy. However, the health literacy curriculum has not yet been refined globally, and is scarce in Taiwan's medical education. We implemented an innovative instructional module to attain professional competence in health literacy among medical students and investigated its effects.

METHODS

We adopted a quasi-experimental design and recruited 204 fifth-year Taiwanese medical students between December 2019 and May 2020. Participants who worked as clerks at the Department of Family Medicine of three medical schools in northern Taiwan were assigned to the experimental group through convenience sampling. A total of 98 students received a three-hour innovative instruction, including medical simulation videos, role-playing, and board games. Both the experimental and control groups completed the online pre-test and mail-in post-test. A generalized estimating equation was applied to measure the effects of the intervention.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between the experimental and control groups in terms of professional competence in health literacy in all three aspects. In terms of knowledge, the experimental group improved 12% more than the control group (𝛽=0.12, 95% CI: 0.05 ~ 0.19, p = 0.001). In terms of attitude, the experimental group improved by an average of 0.27 more points per question than the control group (𝛽=0.27, 95% CI: 0.08 ~ 0.46, p = 0.007). As for skill, the experimental group improved by an average of 0.35 more points per question than the control group (𝛽=0.35, 95% CI: 0.14 ~ 0.55, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The proposed innovative instructional module significantly improved fifth-year medical students' professional competence in health literacy, which is expected to benefit their future medical practices.

Patients' Health Literacy in Rehabilitation: Comparison between the Estimation of Patients and Health Care Professionals

The term health literacy (HL) comprises the handling of health information and disease-specific and generic self-management skills, especially relevant for patients with chronic conditions. Health care professionals (HCPs) should correctly identify patients’ communication needs and their HL levels. Therefore, the aims of the study were (1) to determine inpatient medical rehabilitation patients’ HL based on self-assessment, (2) to evaluate changes from admission to discharge, (3) to identify HCPs estimation of patients’ HL, and (4) to compare the estimated patient HL by patients and HCPs. A combined cross-sectional and longitudinal study was conducted in an orthopedic rehabilitation center in Germany. The multidimensional Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) was filled in by patients (admission, discharge). An adapted version was administered to HCPs (n = 32) in order to assess HL of individual patients. Data from 287 patients were used for the longitudinal analysis, and comparison was based on n = 278 cases with at least two HL estimations. The results showed a significant increase in HL in five of nine scales with small effect sizes. Moreover, HCPs mostly provided higher scores than patients, and agreement was poor to fair. Differences between the HL estimation might lead to communication problems, and communication training could be useful.

The use of 3D-printed models in patient communication: a scoping review

3D models have been used as an asset in many clinical applications and a variety of disciplines, and yet the available literature studying the use of 3D models in communication is limited. This scoping review has been conducted to draw conclusions on the current evidence and learn from previous studies, using this knowledge to inform future work. Our search strategy revealed 269 papers, 19 of which were selected for final inclusion and analysis. When assessing the use of 3D models in doctor-patient communication, there is a need for larger studies and studies including a long-term follow up. Furthermore, there are forms of communication that are yet to be researched and provide a niche that may be beneficial to explore.

Patient Perspectives of Inpatient Telemedicine During COVID-19: A Qualitative Assessment (Preprint)

Background

Telemedicine has been adopted in the inpatient setting to facilitate clinical interactions between on-site clinicians and isolated hospitalized patients. Such remote interactions have the potential to reduce pathogen exposure and use of personal protective equipment but may also pose new safety concerns given prior evidence that isolated patients can receive suboptimal care. Formal evaluations of the use and practical acceptance of inpatient telemedicine among hospitalized patients are lacking.

Objective

We aimed to evaluate the experience of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 with inpatient telemedicine introduced as an infection control measure during the pandemic.

Methods

We conducted a qualitative evaluation in a COVID-19 designated non–intensive care hospital unit at a large academic health center (Stanford Health Care) from October 2020 through January 2021. Semistructured qualitative interviews focused on patient experience, impact on quality of care, communication, and mental health. Purposive sampling was used to recruit participants representing diversity across varying demographics until thematic saturation was reached. Interview transcripts were qualitatively analyzed using an inductive-deductive approach.

Results

Interviews with 20 hospitalized patients suggested that nonemergency clinical care and bridging to in-person care comprised the majority of inpatient telemedicine use. Nurses were reported to enter the room and call on the tablet far more frequently than physicians, who typically entered the room at least daily. Patients reported broad acceptance of the technology, citing improved convenience and reduced anxiety, but preferred in-person care where possible. Quality of care was believed to be similar to in-person care with the exception of a few patients who wanted more frequent in-person examinations. Ongoing challenges included low audio volume, shifting tablet location, and inconsistent verbal introductions from the clinical team.

Conclusions

Patient experiences with inpatient telemedicine were largely favorable. Although most patients expressed a preference for in-person care, telemedicine was acceptable given the circumstances associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Improvements in technical and care team use may enhance acceptability. Further evaluation is needed to understand the impact of inpatient telemedicine and the optimal balance between in-person and virtual care in the hospital setting.

A Case-Based Critical Care Curriculum for Internal Medicine Residents Addressing Social Determinants of Health

INTRODUCTION

Graduate medical education on social determinants of health (SDOH) is limited. Residents often directly care for vulnerable populations at safety-net hospitals, yet curricula thus far are based in the ambulatory setting.

METHODS

We developed a case-based curriculum integrating SDOH with critical care topics to standardize knowledge and improve skills and attitudes of internal medicine residents working with these patients. We conducted a needs assessment, identified systematic social risk domains, and modified a published curriculum to develop the content. Case-based discussions were conducted weekly in the medical intensive care unit, while knowledge, attitudes, and skills were assessed daily during multidisciplinary rounds. A 360-degree assessment was completed with pre- and postcurriculum surveys and self-reflection.

RESULTS

Eleven residents completed postcurriculum surveys. Both pre- and postcurriculum, residents reported confidence in identifying and describing how SDOH affect care. After the curriculum, residents could name more resources for patients experiencing health disparities due to substance abuse (pre: 47%, post: 73%) and financial constraints (pre: 50%, post:64%). This curriculum was recognized as the first training many residents received (pre: 31%, post: 91%) with formal feedback (pre: 16%, post: 64%).

DISCUSSION

Implementing a curriculum of social risk assessment in critically ill patients was difficult due to competition with clinical care. Participating residents said they "loved the open dialogue" to reflect on their experiences; this became an avenue to "debrief on specific patient encounters and [how] SDOH brought [patients] to the ICU." Future directions include qualitative analysis of reflections and assessment of curricular impact on trainee resiliency.

You Can Teach Every Patient: A Health Literacy and Clear Communication Curriculum for Pediatric Clerkship Students

INTRODUCTION

Poor health literacy has a negative impact on various health care outcomes. Medical schools are not consistently providing health literacy training; when they do, they overly rely on didactics.

METHODS

Our curriculum for third-year pediatric clerkship students taught principles of health literacy and evidence-supported clear communication strategies. Communication skills were structured on a novel mnemonic: CTEP (clear language, teach-back, effectively encouraging questions, and pictures). The curriculum included a 30-minute didactic, followed 1-2 weeks later by a 90-minute interactive workshop. All 188 clerkship students attended the didactic lecture; approximately half (90) attended the follow-up workshop. All students completed a formative objective structured clinical encounter. Standardized patients then evaluated students' use of the four clear communication skills. Students completed a survey to assess confidence, knowledge, and use of the skills.

RESULTS

Compared to the didactic-only group, students in the didactic + workshop group more frequently used teach-back (53% vs. 27%, p < .01) and pictures (46% vs. 10%, p < .01). In addition, the didactic + workshop group had improved recall, self-reported use, and comfort with the skills. The didactic + workshop group solicited questions from the standardized patient less often, and there was no difference in use of clear language between the two groups.

DISCUSSION

An interactive curriculum in health literacy and clear communication for pediatric clerkship students was superior to a didactic alone. Optimizing instructional methods for health literacy skills can help future physicians properly communicate with their patients to improve health outcomes.

Evaluating a Health Literacy Communication Training for Medical Students: Using Plain Language

Medical students tend to use technical terminology without explanation when communicating with patients, and do not feel confident interacting with patients who have low health literacy (LHL). The present study consisted of an evaluation of a brief health literacy training for first-year medical students seeking to enhance their knowledge of health literacy, self-efficacy in communicating with patients who have LHL, and clear communication skills. The training was guided by patient-centered communication, social cognitive theory, and the universal precautions approach to health literacy, and developed and delivered by communication scholars. Results indicated that medical students had increased health literacy knowledge, confidence in communicating with patients who have LHL, and found the training to be useful. Medical student interactions with standardized patients from the cohort who received the training were compared with the previous year's cohort who did not receive the training. Analysis of transcripts of interactions after the training indicated no significant differences in medical students' use of examples. Health literacy trainings should be incorporated into the medical student curriculum, taught in collaboration with communication scholars, and be given more frequently throughout the medical school career to reinforce utilization of clear communication strategies.

Social and medical risk factors associated with supportive needs in the first year following localized prostate cancer treatment

Purpose:

Individuals who completed treatment for prostate cancer (PCa) often report poor coping and practical concerns when adapting to new roles in their lives—and strong patient-provider communication is critical for this period. However, there is limited research identifying factors associated with supportive needs after the completion of PCa treatment. This study aimed to identify the social and medical risk factors associated with supportive needs for adapting among individuals who completed treatment for localized PCa.

Methods:

Using baseline data from a study evaluating a web-based support system for patients in the first year following treatment for localized PCa, self-efficacy for re-entry (e.g., maintaining relationships, symptom management), medical interactions, and practical concerns (e.g., insurance, exercise) were assessed. Multivariable regression analyses were completed to identify risk factors for low readiness.

Results:

Participants (N=431) with lower health literacy or income, or with depressive symptoms had lower self-efficacy for re-entry, more negative interactions with medical providers, and more practical concerns (ps<.05). Lastly, Non-Hispanic White participants reported greater readiness compared to all other races (ps<.05).

Conclusions:

Multiple social and medical risk factors are associated with greater supportive needs when adapting to new roles after PCa treatment. Understanding the risk factors for supportive needs in this period is critical. Future research is needed to help providers identify and support individuals at risk for poorer coping and greater practical concerns after treatment completion.

Implications for Cancer Survivors:

Identifying individuals with greater supportive needs following treatment for localized PCa treatment will help ensure successful adaptation to new roles.