Measurement of kinetic parameters for urea in end-stage renal disease patients using a two-compartment model

Final report of the safety assessment of Urea

Although Urea is officially described as a buffering agent, humectant, and skin-conditioning agent-humectant for use in cosmetic products, there is a report stating that Urea also is used in cosmetics for its desquamating and antimicrobial action. In 2001, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reported that Urea was used in 239 formulations. Concentrations of use for Urea ranged from 0.01% to 10%. Urea is generally recognized as safe by FDA for the following uses: side-seam cements for food contact; an inhibitor or stabilizer in pesticide formulations and formulations applied to animals; internal sizing for paper and paperboard and surface sizing and coating of paper and paper board that contact water-in-oil dairy emulsions, low-moisture fats and oils, moist bakery products, dry solids with surface containing no free fats or oil, and dry solids with the surface of fat or oil; and to facilitate fermentation of wine. Urea is the end product of mammalian protein metabolism and the chief nitrogenous compound of urine. Urea concentrations in muscle, liver, and fetuses of rats increased after a subcutaneous injection of Urea. Urea diffused readily through the placenta and into other maternal and fetal organs. The half-life of Urea injected into rabbits was on the order of several hours, and the reutilization rate was 32.2% to 88.8%. Urea given to rats by a bolus injection or continuous infusion resulted in distribution to the following brain regions: frontal lobe, caudate nucleus, hippocampus, thalamus plus hypothalamus, pons and white matter (corpus callosum). The permeability constant after treatment with Urea of whole skin and the dermis of rabbits was 2.37 +/- 0.13 (x 10(6)) and 1.20 +/- 0.09 (x10(3)) cm/min, respectively. The absorption of Urea across normal and abraded human skin was 9.5% +/- 2.3% and 67.9% +/- 5.6%, respectively. Urea increased the skin penetration of other compounds, including hydrocortisone. No toxicity was observed for Urea at levels as high as 2000 mg/kg in acute oral studies using female rats or mice. No signs of toxicity were observed in male piglets dosed orally with up to 4 g/kg Urea for 5 days. Dogs dosed orally with 5 to 30 g/L Urea for 4 to 10 days had signs of toxicity, including weakness, anorexia, vomiting and retching, diarrhea and a decreased body temperature, which led to a deep torpor or coma. No significant microscopic changes were observed in the skin of male nude mice dermally exposed to 100% Urea for 24 h. No observable effect on fetal development was seen in rats and mice dosed orally with an aqueous solution of Urea (2000 mg/kg) on days 10 and 12 of gestation. The mean number of implants, live fetuses, percent fetal resorptions, mean fetal weight, and percent fetuses malformed were comparable to control group. A detergent containing 15% Urea was injected into pregnant ICR-JCl mice and dams and fetuses had no significant differences when compared to control animals. Urea given orally did not enhance the developmental toxicity of N-nitrosomethylurea. Female Sprague-Dawley rats injected in the uterine horn with 0.05 ml Urea on day 3 (preimplantation) or on day 7 (post implantation) exhibited no maternal mortality or morbidity; a dose-dependent reduction in embryo survival was seen with preimplantation treatment. Urea injected intra-amniotically induces mid-trimester abortions in humans. Urea was not genotoxic in several bacterial and mammalian assays; although in assays where Urea was used at a high concentration, genotoxicity was found, many in in vitro assays. Urea is commonly used in studies of DNA because it causes uncoiling of DNA molecules. Urea was not carcinogenic in Fisher 344 rats or C57B1/6 mice fed diets containing up to 4.5% Urea. Exposure of normal human skin to 60% Urea produced no significant irritation in one study, but 5% Urea was slightly irritating and 20% Urea was irritating in other reports. Burning sensations are the most frequently reported effect of Urea used alone or with other agents in treatment of diseased skin. Overall, there are few reports of sensitization among the many clinical studies that report use of Urea in treatment of diseased skin. The Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel determined the data provided in this report to be sufficient to assess the safety of Urea. The Panel did note that Urea can cause uncoiling of DNA, a property used in many DNA studies, but concluded that this in vitro activity is not linked to any in vivo genotoxic activity. Although noting that formulators should be aware that Urea can increase the percutaneous absorption of other chemicals, the CIR Expert Panel concluded that Urea is safe as used in cosmetic products.

Anthropometrically estimated total body water volumes are larger than modeled urea volume in chronic hemodialysis patients: effects of age, race, and gender

BACKGROUND

The modeled volume of urea distribution (Vm) in intermittently hemodialyzed patients is often compared with total body water (TBW) volume predicted from population studies of patient anthropometrics (Vant).

METHODS

Using data from the HEMO Study, we compared Vm determined by both blood-side and dialysate-side urea kinetic models with Vant as calculated by the Watson, Hume-Weyers, and Chertow anthropometric equations.

RESULTS

Median levels of dialysate-based Vm and blood-based Vm agreed (43% and 44% of body weight, respectively). These volumes were lower than anthropometric estimates of TBW, which had median values of 52% to 55% of body weight for the three formulas evaluated. The difference between the Watson equation for TBW and modeled urea volume was greater in Caucasians (19%) than in African Americans (13%). Correlations between Vm and Vant determined by each of the three anthropometric estimation equations were similar; but Vant derived from the Watson formula had a slightly higher correlation with Vm. The difference between Vm and the anthropometric formulas was greatest with the Chertow equation, less with the Hume-Weyers formula, and least with the Watson estimate. The age term in the Watson equation for men that adjusts Vant downward with increasing age reduced an age effect on the difference between Vant and Vm in men.

CONCLUSION

The findings show that kinetically derived values for V from blood-side and dialysate-side modeling are similar, and that these modeled urea volumes are lower by a substantial amount than anthropometric estimates of TBW. The higher values for anthropometry-derived TBW in hemodialyzed patients could be due to measurement errors. However, the possibility exists that TBW space is contracted in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or that the TBW space and the urea distribution space are not identical.

Compartment effects in hemodialysis

Compartment effects in hemodialysis are important because they reduce the efficiency of removal of the compartmentalized solute during dialysis. The dialyzer can only remove those waste products that are presented to it, and then only in proportion to the concentration of the solute in the blood. Classically a two-compartment system has been modeled, with the compartments arranged in series. Because modeling suggests that the sequestered compartment is larger than the accessible compartment, an assumption has been made that the sequestered compartment is the intracellular space. For urea and other solutes that move easily across many cell membranes, compartmentalization may be flow related, that is, related to sequestration in organs (muscle, skin, bone). Although mathematically urea rebound and mass balance can be described with either model, the flow-related model best explains data showing that urea rebound after dialysis is increased during ultrafiltration, diminished during high cardiac output states, and also reduced during exercise. Whether compartmentalization is increased in vasoconstricted intensive care unit patients receiving acute dialysis remains an open question.

Anthropometry-based equations overestimate the urea distribution volume in hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Protein intake in hemodialysis patients can be estimated indirectly from the protein equivalent of total nitrogen appearance (PNA) during the interdialytic period. A reliable estimate of the patient's urea distribution volume (UDV) is required to assess protein intake from PNA values. UDV values are derived frequently from simple anthropometric equations.

METHODS

UDV values based on anthropometric methods were compared with UDV values determined by direct dialysate quantitation (DDQ) in 54 stable chronic hemodialysis patients. The anthropometric methods included the following: the Watson equations (WAT), a fixed proportion of postdialysis body weight, 58% for males and 55% for females (% body wt), and skinfold thickness measurements (SFT). Postdialysis blood samples were drawn at 15-minutes postdialysis.

RESULTS

UDV(WAT) and UDV(SFT) overestimated UDV(DDQ) by about 8 L [limits of agreement (LOA): 2.6 to 14.2 L] in males and about 6 L (LOA: -0.8 to 12.4 L) in females. The overestimation by UDV(%BW) was even larger: 10.5 L (LOA: 2.0 to 19.0 L) in males and 11.1 L (LOA: 2.1 to 20.1 L) in females. The difference between UDV(%BW) and UDV(DDQ) correlated with the percentage of body fat (r = 0.57) and body mass index (r = 0.48). In a subgroup of seven patients, UDV was also determined by dilution (DIL) of the stable isotope [(13)C]urea. UDV(WAT) and UDV(%BW) overestimated UDV(DIL) significantly. In contrast, UDV(DDQ) was significantly smaller than UDV(DIL), even after correction for incomplete postdialysis equilibration. PNA values calculated using the various UDV estimates were compared with dietary protein intake (DPI) assessed from food records. PNA(DDQ) (61 +/- 10 g/day) did not differ significantly from DPI (63 +/- 13 g/day), but the agreement in individual patients varied considerably (LOA, -24 to 20 g/day). Anthropometric-based PNA values overestimated DPI by 8 to 16 g/day.

CONCLUSIONS

Anthropometry-based equations overestimate UDV values in hemodialysis patients, leading to an overestimation of PNA values. Although PNA measurements by DDQ appear to be more reliable for assessing protein intake, PNA(DDQ) values should be interpreted with caution in individual hemodialysis patients.

Quantifying the effect of changes in the hemodialysis prescription on effective solute removal with a mathematical model

One potential benefit of chronic hemodialysis (HD) regimens of longer duration or greater frequency than typical three-times-weekly schedules is enhanced solute removal over a relatively wide molecular weight spectrum of uremic toxins. This study assesses the effect of variations in HD frequency (F: per week), duration (T: min per treatment), and blood/dialysate flow rates (QB/QD: ml/min) on steady-state concentration profiles of five surrogates: urea (U), creatinine (Cr), vancomycin (V), inulin (I), and beta2-microglobulin (beta2M). The regimens assessed for an anephric 70-kg patient were: A (standard): F = 3, T = 240, QB = 350, QD = 600; B (daily/short-time): F = 7, T = 100, QB = 350, QD = 600; C/D/E (low-flow/long-time): F = 3/5/7, T = 480, QB = 300, QD = 100. HD was simulated with a variable-volume double-pool model, which was solved by numerical integration (Runge-Kutta method). Endogenous generation rates (G) for U, Cr, and beta2M were 6.25, 1.0, and 0.17 mg/min, respectively; constant infusion rates for V and I of 0.2 and 0.3 mg/min, respectively, were used to simulate middle molecule (MM) G values. Intercompartment clearances of 600, 275, 125, 90, and 40 ml/min were used for U, Cr, V, I, and beta2M, respectively, For each solute/regimen combination, the equivalent renal clearance (EKR: ml/min) was calculated as a dimensionless value normalized to the regimen A EKR, which was 13.4, 10.8, 6.6, 3.7, and 4.8 ml/min for U, Cr, V, I, and beta2M, respectively. For regimens B, C, D, and E, respectively, these normalized EKR values were U: 1.04, 0.96, 1.58, and 2.22; Cr: 1.03, 1.08, 1.80, and 2.55; V: 1.06, 1.32, 2.21, and 3.12; I: 1.05, 1.54, 2.57, and 3.62; beta2M: 1.00, 1.27, 1.73, and 2.19. The extent of post-HD rebound (%) was highest for regimens A and B, ranging from 16% (urea) to 50% (inulin), and lowest for regimen E, ranging from 6% (urea) to 28% (beta2M). The following conclusions can be made: (1) Relative to a standard three-times-weekly HD regimen of approximately the same total (weekly) treatment duration, a daily/short-time regimen results in modest (3 to 6%) increases in effective small solute and MM removal. (2) Relative to a standard three-times-weekly HD regimen, a three-times-weekly low-flow/long-time regimen results in comparable effective small solute removal and progressive increases in MM and beta2M removal. A daily low-flow/long-time regimen substantially increases the effective removal of all solutes.

Evaluation of urea kinetics utilizing stable isotope urea and pharmacokinetic modeling

The determination of urea kinetics plays a central role in clinical dialysis prescription. There persist, however, significant limitations to current approaches, particularly as they pertain to rigorous explorations of urea metabolism, distribution, and removal. This report describes methodologies designed to address these limitations by coupling a stable nitrogen isotope method with strict compartmental pharmacokinetic modeling. The findings of the present study can be summarized as follows. First, the use of stable isotope labeled exogenous urea is a reliable clinically applicable method for determination of urea kinetics. Second, this method offers significant advantages in that it allows for an accurate measurement of urea distribution space, endogenous urea production, and non-renal clearance of urea. Third, this method is significantly more rigorous than urea kinetic models that utilize only endogenous urea and do not carefully fit data points. Finally, pharmacokinetic modeling suggests that a two-compartment model satisfies all aspects of urea distribution and removal, but these compartments should not be equated with specific physiologic spaces. The combination of stable isotope urea compartmental modeling is a rigorous methodology for the assessment and validation of urea kinetics.

Element- and isotope-specific detection for high-performance liquid chromatography using chemical reaction interface mass spectrometry

We have developed a combination of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and the chemical reaction interface mass spectrometry (CRIMS) method by using a Vestec Universal Interface (UI). This interface provides the extremely high degree of solvent removal that the CRIMS process requires. In doing so, we have produced an HPLC detector with the ability to carry out the element- and isotope-selective analyses with detection that is inherently: linear, structure-independent, sensitive, selective, comprehensive and flexible. The characteristics of the instrumentation and its performance are described.