Background and rationale of the eXalt3 trial investigating X-396 in the treatment of ALK+ non-small-cell lung cancer

Case Report: Ensartinib for gastric epithelioid inflammatory myofibrosarcoma with STRN-ALK fusion

Epithelioid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma (EIMS) is a highly aggressive malignant subtype of inflammatory myofibroblastoma (IMT) associated with poor prognosis. IMT can occur in various parts of the body, most frequently in the lungs, followed by the mesentery, omentum, retroperitoneum, and pelvis, among other areas; however, it is exceptionally rare in the stomach. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) is a critical driver of lung cancer development and is currently the "gold standard" target for non-small cell lung cancer treatment. However, there are few reports on the use of ALK inhibitors for EIMS, necessitating further investigation. A male patient with postoperative inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma of the stomach received postoperative chemotherapy and had a stable outcome. However, a repeat CT scan performed 11 months later revealed disease progression. The patient later underwent immunohistochemistry testing that indicated ALK positivity, and next-generation sequencing revealed STRN-ALK fusion. Ensartinib 225 mg qd was administered as recommended, and the patient experienced only mild pruritus and no adverse effects such as rash. Eight months after CT follow-up, the patient's subseptal soft tissue nodules had decreased, and the outcome was assessed as a partial response. The findings of this case report introduce a novel strategy for treating ALK-positive EIMS that utilizes ensartinib, a drug with previously demonstrated success in the treatment of ALK-positive cancer.

Synthetic Approaches to the New Drugs Approved During 2020

New drugs introduced to the market are privileged structures that have affinities for biological targets implicated in human diseases and conditions. These new chemical entities (NCEs), particularly small molecules and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), provide insight into molecular recognition and simultaneously function as leads for the design of future medicines. This Review is part of a continuing series presenting the most likely process-scale synthetic approaches to 44 new chemical entities approved for the first time anywhere in the world during 2020.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors and their effect on the kidney

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality and approximately 5% of non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are positive for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement or fusion with echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4. ALK inhibitors are the mainstay treatment for patients with NSCLC harboring a rearrangement of the ALK gene or the ROS1 oncogenes. With the recent publication of pivotal trials leading to the approval of these compounds in different indications, their toxicity profile warrants an update. Several ALK-1 inhibitors are used in clinical practice, including crizotinib, ceritinib and alectinib. According to the package insert and published literature, treatment with several ALK-1 inhibitors appears to be associated with the development of peripheral edema and rare electrolyte disorders, kidney failure, proteinuria and an increased risk for the development and progression of renal cysts. This review introduces the different types of ALK inhibitors, focusing on their detailed kidney-related side effects in clinical practice.

Cost-Effectiveness of Lorlatinib as a First-Line Therapy for Untreated Advanced Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction

Recently, a phase III CROWN trial compared the efficacy of two anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors and demonstrated that lorlatinib displayed clinical improvement over crizotinib for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of lorlatinib as a first-line therapy for patients with advanced ALK-positive (+) NSCLC.

Materials and Methods

A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using a microsimulation model from the US payer perspective and a lifetime horizon (30 years) in patients with previous untreated advanced ALK+ NSCLC. Based on the CROWN trial, patient characteristics were obtained, and the transition probabilities were estimated. All direct costs were derived from official sources and published literature. The main outcomes of the model were total costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and life years (LYs). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses and multiple scenario analyses were conducted to test the robustness of the model outcomes.

Results

In the base case analysis, in which 1 million patients were simulated, treatment with lorlatinib or crizotinib as the first-line treatment was related to a mean cost of $909,758 and $616,230 (incremental cost: $293,528) and a mean survival of 4.81 QALYs and 4.09 QALYs (incremental QALY: 0.72) per patient, respectively. The main drivers of cost effectiveness were drug price and subsequent cost. PAS indicated that lorlatinib has 90% cost-effectiveness when compared to crizotinib when the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold in increased to $448,000/QALY. Scenario analysis demonstrated that lorlatinib has 100% cost-effectiveness at a WTP threshold of 200,000/QALY compared to crizotinib treatment when the price of lorlatinib is decreased to 75% ($424.5) of its original price.

Conclusions

In this study, lorlatinib was unlikely to be cost effective compared with crizotinib for patients with previously untreated advanced ALK+ NSCLC at a WTP threshold of 200,000/QALY.

Treatment Sequencing for Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Rearranged Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for about 85% of all lung cancer cases and is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Most NSCLC patients are diagnosed with advanced disease and require systemic treatment. Despite emerging advances in chemotherapy and immunotherapy, the prognosis of stage IV patients remains poor. However, the discovery of oncogenic driver mutations including mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and others, characterize a subset of patients with the opportunity of targeted therapies. Fusions between the ALK and echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4) are present in ∼ 3-5% of patients with NSCLC. Several first-, second-, and third-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been developed in the last decade and have tremendously changed treatment options and outcomes of ALK-positive NSCLC patients. With increasing treatment options, treatment sequence decisions have become more and more complex. ALK-mutations, fusion variants, or activation of by-pass pathways result in treatment resistance during the course of treatment in nearly all patients. Mutation-guided treatment sequencing can lead to better outcomes, and re-biopsy or liquid-biopsy should be performed whenever possible in case of disease progression in ALK-rearranged patients. In the future, combinational treatment of ALK TKIs with other pathway-inhibitors might further improve patients' treatment options and outcomes. Here, we review the data for currently available ALK TKIs, discuss approaches of treatment sequencing, and give an outlook on emerging developments.

Potential Unreliability of Uncommon ALK, ROS1, and RET Genomic Breakpoints in Predicting the Efficacy of Targeted Therapy in NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

Variable genomic breakpoints have been identified through the application of target-capture DNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) for ALK, ROS1, and RET fusion detection in NSCLC. We investigated whether ALK, ROS1, and RET genomic breakpoint location can predict matched targeted therapy efficacy.

METHODS

NSCLCs were analyzed by DNA NGS, target-specific RNA NGS, whole-transcriptome sequencing, and immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

In total, 3787 NSCLC samples were analyzed. DNA NGS detected ALK, ROS1, and RET fusions in 241, 59, and 76 cases, respectively. These fusions were divided into canonical (single EML4-ALK, CD74/EZR/TPM3/SDC4-ROS1, and KIF5B/CCDC6-RET fusions), noncanonical (single non-EML4-ALK, non-CD74/EZR/TPM3/SDC4-ROS1, and non-KIF5B/CCDC6-RET fusions), and primary/reciprocal (both primary and reciprocal rearrangements were detected) subtypes on the basis of genomic breakpoint position, and noncanonical and primary/reciprocal subtypes were defined as uncommon fusions. Further RNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry revealed that six of 47 (12.8%) uncommon fusions were actually nonproductive rearrangements that generated no aberrant transcripts or proteins. Moreover, genomic breakpoints of canonical ALK and RET, but not ROS1, fusions always predicted breakpoints at the transcript level, whereas 85.4% (35 of 41) of uncommon fusions actually produced canonical fusion transcripts. Patients with uncommon ALK fusion (n = 31) who received first-line crizotinib exhibited shorter median progression-free survival than those with canonical ALK fusion (n = 53, 8.4 mo versus 12.0 mo, p = 0.004). However, no difference in progression-free survival was observed when only ALK RNA or protein-positive cases were analyzed (p = 0.185).

CONCLUSIONS

Uncommon ALK, ROS1, and RET genomic breakpoint is an unreliable predictor of matched targeted therapy efficacy. Functional validation by RNA or protein assay may add value for the accurate detection and interpretation of rare fusions.

Mass balance, metabolic disposition, and pharmacokinetics of [14C]ensartinib, a novel potent anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, in healthy subjects following oral administration

PURPOSE

Ensartinib is a novel, potent and highly selective inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) that has promising clinical activity and low toxicity in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer. This study was conducted to investigate the pharmacokinetics, metabolism and excretion of ensartinib following a single 200 mg/100 μCi oral dose of radiolabeled ensartinib to healthy subjects.

METHODS

Six healthy male subjects were enrolled and administrated an oral suspension in a fasted state. Blood, urine and feces were collected. Radioactivity concentrations were measured by liquid scintillation counting and plasma concentrations of ensartinib by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Both techniques were applied for metabolite profiling and characterization.

RESULTS

The mean total recovery was 101.21% of the radiolabeled dose with 91.00% and 10.21% excreted in feces and urine, respectively. Unchanged ensartinib was the predominant drug-related component in urine and feces, representing 4.39% and 38.12% of the administered dose, respectively. Unchanged ensartinib and its metabolite M465 were the major circulating components, accounting for the same 27.45% of the plasma total radioactivity (AUC_0-24h pool), while other circulating metabolites were minor, accounting for less than 10%. Mean C_max, AUC_0-∞, T_1/2 and T_max values for ensartinib in plasma were 185 ng/mL, 3827 h ng/mL, 18.3 h and 3.25 h, respectively. The total radioactivity in plasma was cleared with terminal half-life of 27.2 h. Treatment with ensartinib was well tolerated, and no serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

It was well tolerated in the six healthy male subjects following a single oral administration of 200 mg/100 μCi dose of ensartinib. Besides unchanged ensartinib, metabolite of M465 was the predominant circulating drug-related component. The drug was primarily eliminated in feces.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03804541.

[Pharmacology and Clinical Evaluation of Ensartinib Hydrochloride Capsule]

肺癌是全世界发病率和致死率最高的恶性肿瘤，其中非小细胞肺癌（non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC）约占肺癌的85%。间变性淋巴瘤激酶（anaplastic lymphoma kinase, ALK）重排阳性的NSCLC仅占全部NSCLC的5%，但预后较差，因此积极的治疗非常迫切。盐酸恩沙替尼胶囊（ensartinib hydrochloride capsule，X-396，商品名贝美纳TM）是第二代ALK抑制剂，对ALK的抑制活性和肺癌中枢神经系统转移的有效性较克唑替尼更强，并且可抑制多个克唑替尼耐药突变位点，临床拟用于治疗克唑替尼耐药的ALK阳性NSCLC。文中对盐酸恩沙替尼胶囊在国内外开展的Ⅰ期-Ⅲ期临床试验进行了总结，并对其药理作用、药代动力学和药效学、临床疗效和安全性评价进行了综述。

ALK inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We sought to assess the relative effects of individual anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and grey literature (July 23, 2019) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included participants with ALK- or ROS1-positive NSCLC who received any ALK inhibitor compared with placebo, another ALK inhibitor, or the same ALK inhibitor at a different dose. The primary outcome was treatment-related death. Secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and serious adverse events. Data were pooled via meta-analysis and network meta-analysis, and risk of bias was assessed. PROSPERO: CRD42017077046.

RESULTS

Thirteen RCTs reporting outcomes of interest among participants with ALK-positive NSCLC were identified. Treatment-related deaths were rare, with 10 deaths attributed to crizotinib (risk difference v. chemotherapy: 0.49, 95% credible interval [CrI] -0.16 to 1.46; odds ratio 2.58 (0.76-11.37). All ALK inhibitors improved PSF relative to chemotherapy (hazard ratio [95% CrI]: crizotinib 0.46 [0.39-0.54]; ceritinib 0.52 [0.42-0.64]; alectinib 300 BID 0.16 [0.08-0.33]; alectinib 600 BID 0.23 [0.17-0.30]; brigatinib 0.23 [0.15-0.35]), while alectinib and brigatinib improved PFS over crizotinib and ceritinib (alectinib v. crizotinib 0.34 [0.17-0.70]; alectinib v. ceritinib 0.30 [0.14-0.64]; brigatinib v. crizotinib 0.49 [0.33-0.73]; brigatinib v. ceritinib 0.43 [0.27-0.70]). OS was improved with alectinib compared with chemotherapy (HR 0.57 [95% CrI 0.39-0.83]) and crizotinib (0.68 [0.48-0.96]). Use of crizotinib (odds ratio 2.08 [95% CrI 1.56-2.79]) and alectinib (1.60 [1.00-2.58]) but not ceritinib (1.25 [0.90-1.74), increased the risk of serious adverse events compared with chemotherapy. Results were generally consistent among treatment-experienced or naïve participants.

CONCLUSION(S)

Treatment-related deaths were infrequent among ALK-positive NSCLC. PFS may be improved by alectinib and brigatinib relative to other ALK inhibitors; however, the assessment of OS is likely confounded by treatment crossover and should be interpreted with caution.

New generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene translocations are pro-tumoral driver alterations that encompass 3-7% of non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with specific, clinic and histologic features. The therapeutic strategy depends on anti-ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of which crizotinib was the first approved for clinical use. Despite its use improved significantly progression-free survival, overall response rate and duration of response of this illness, after a median period of 10.9 months all patients progress due to the development of acquired resistance mutations in the ALK tyrosine kinase domain in approximately one third of patients. Moreover, 60-90% of patients treated with crizotinib has a progression in the central nervous system (CNS) in absence of extracranial worsening of the disease. This is primarily attributed to poor CNS penetration by crizotinib as many pre-clinical and clinical models suggest. For instance, in order to overtake acquired resistance to crizotinib, prolong the control of the disease and manage CNS localizations, several II and III generation TKIs have been developed. Some of them were approved after the failure of crizotinib (ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib and lorlatinib) and in first line setting (ceritinib, alectinib and brigatinib) while others are still under evaluation for TKI-naive patients such as lorlatinib, ensartinib and entrectinib. In this review we will discuss the most recent results of new TKIs in order to describe a fast growing therapeutic landscape in this setting.