Effect of second-generation sulfonylureas on survival in patients with diabetes mellitus after myocardial infarction

Sulfonylurea Class of Antidiabetic Drugs Inhibit Acetylcholinesterase Activity: Unexplored Auxiliary Pharmacological Benefit toward Alzheimer's Disease

Contemporary literature documents extensive research on common causative mechanisms, pathogenic pathways and dual effective remedies for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Tolbutamide (TBM), chlorpropamide (CPM), and glyburide (GLY) are three sulfonylurea antidiabetic drugs of different generations. All these drugs were found to exhibit moderate to strong inhibitory efficiency on the neurotransmitter degrading enzyme acetylcholinesterase (AChE) with GLY (IC50 = 0.74 ± 0.02 μM) being the most potent, followed by CPM (IC50 = 5.72 ± 0.24 μM) and TBM (IC50 = 28.9 ± 1.60 μM). Notably, the inhibition efficiency of GLY is even comparable with the FDA approved AD drug, donepezil (DON). The larger size of GLY spans almost the full gorge of AChE ranging from catalytic active site (CAS) to the peripheral active site (PAS) with relatively strong binding affinity (6.0 × 105 M-1) and acts as a competitive inhibitor for AChE. On the other hand, while they show relatively weak binding ((2-6) × 104 M-1), both CPM and TBM act as noncompetitive binders. While these two drugs can bind to PAS, MD simulation results predict an alternative noncompetitive inhibition mechanism for CPM. These results open the possibility of repurposing the antidiabetic drugs, particularly GLY, in the treatment of AD. The consequential side effect of excess acetylcholine production, due to the administration of these drugs to AD-unaffected patients, can be rectified by using colloidal gold and silver nanofluids as potential AChE activity boosters.

Vaccinium bracteatum Thunb. Leaves' polysaccharide alleviates hepatic gluconeogenesis via the downregulation of miR-137

Vaccinium bracteatum Thunb.(VBT) is a traditional Chinese herb that recorded has an effect of hypoglycemic. We previous discovered a dose-dependent anti-diabetic function of VBT. leaves' polysaccharide (VBTLP), but little is known about its underlying molecular mechanism. Therefore, we hypothesized that VBTLP would decrease hepatic gluconeogenesis to improve glucose metabolism in mice. To test this hypothesis, glucose tolerance test was performed to evaluate the effect of VBTLP on mice hepatic gluconeogenesis. Western blot and RT-PCR were performed to measure both in vivo and in vitro gene regulation under VBTLP treatment. Online bioinformatic analysis was performed to discover a target candidate, miR-137 of LKB1 and AMPK under VBTLP treatment, and the luciferase assay was conducted to validate it. Here we found that VBT. leaves' polysaccharide (VBTLP) decreased hepatic gluconeogenesis via activation of LKB1/AMPK axis in vivo and in vitro. Mechanistic studies reveal that miR-137 regulates hepatic glucose homeostasis by directly targeting AMPK and LKB1. Furthermore, we shown that VBTLP decreased hepatic miR-137 level, which might contribute to activation of LKB1/AMPK and downregulation of gluconeogenesis. Taken together, our study shown that the mechanisms might involve in VBTLP hypoglycemic effect, alleviates hepatic gluconeogenesis via the downregulation of miR-137. Our findings provide guidance in developing novel, safe and effective therapies for T2DM.

Is gliclazide a sulfonylurea with difference? A review in 2016

Sulfonylureas (SUs) remain the most commonly prescribed drug after metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2DM), despite the availability of several newer agents. The primary reason of SUs being most popular is their quick glycemic response, time-tested experience and least cost. Although SUs are one amongst the several other second line agents after metformin in all major guidelines, the new Dutch type 2 guidelines specifically advise gliclazide as the preferred second line drug instead of SUs as a class. The World Health Organization (WHO) has also included gliclazide in their Model List of Essential Medicines 2013 motivated by its safety data in elderly patients. Specifically advising gliclazide may have been based on emerging evidence suggesting cardiovascular neutrality of gliclazide over other SUs. This prompted us to do a literature review of gliclazide efficacy and safety data compared to other SUs as well as oral anti-diabetic drugs.

Comparative cardiovascular safety of insulin secretagogues following hospitalization for ischemic heart disease among type 2 diabetes patients: a cohort study

AIM

To evaluate the association between insulin secretagogues and adverse cardiovascular sequelae in type 2 diabetes patients hospitalized for ischemic heart disease (IHD).

METHODS

Administrative health records from Alberta, Canada between 1998 and 2010 were used to identify 2,254 gliclazide, 3,289 glyburide and 740 repaglinide users prior to an IHD-related hospitalization. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to compare the 30-day risk of a composite outcome of all-cause mortality or new onset of atrial fibrillation, stroke, heart failure or myocardial infarction according to insulin secretagogue use.

RESULTS

Mean (SD) age was 76.1 (6.9) years, and 60.7% were men. The composite outcome occurred in 322 (30.2%) gliclazide users, 455 (28.1%) glyburide users and 81 (23.4%) repaglinide users within 30 days of IHD hospitalization. There were no differences in risk for glyburide use (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-1.05) or repaglinide use (aHR 0.80; 95% CI 0.63-1.03) compared to gliclazide. Similar results were observed in analyses for each element of the composite outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

In older patients with type 2 diabetes hospitalized for IHD, prior use of gliclazide, glyburide, or repaglinide appears to be associated with a similar risk of adverse cardiovascular sequelae.

Mortality risk among sulfonylureas: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Sulfonylureas are common second-line options for management of type 2 diabetes; however, they are associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events compared with other antidiabetic drugs. Since tissue selectivity and risk of hypoglycaemia differ among sulfonylureas, we aimed to assess whether mortality and the risk of cardiovascular events also varies.

METHODS

We searched Medline and Embase from inception to June 11, 2014, to identify controlled studies reporting the risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular-related mortality, or myocardial infarction for at least two sulfonylureas. We examined differences in cardiovascular event risk among sulfonylureas with random effects models for direct pairwise comparisons and network meta-analyses to incorporate direct and indirect data.

FINDINGS

14 970 (9%) of 167 327 patients in 18 studies died: 841 (4%) of 19 334 gliclazide users, 5482 (11%) of 49 389 glimepiride users, 2106 (15%) of 14 464 glipizide users, 5296 (7%) of 77 169 glibenclamide users, 1066 (17%) of 6187 tolbutamide users, and 179 (23%) of 784 chlorpropamide users. Inconsistency was low for the network meta-analysis of all-cause mortality, and the relative risk of death compared with glibenclamide was 0·65 (95% credible interval 0·53-0·79) for gliclazide, 0·83 (0·68-1·00) for glimepiride, 0·98 (0·80-1·19) for glipizide, 1·13 (0·90-1·42) for tolbutamide, and 1·34 (0·98-1·86) for chlorpropamide. Similar associations were noted for cardiovascular-related mortality: the relative risk compared with glibenclamide was 0·60 (95% credible interval 0·45-0·84) for gliclazide, 0·79 (0·57-1·11) for glimepiride, 1·01 (0·72-1·43) for glipizide, 1·11 (0·79-1·55) for tolbutamide, and 1·45 (0·88-2·44) for chlorpropamide.

INTERPRETATION

Gliclazide and glimepiride were associated with a lower risk of all-cause and cardiovascular-related mortality compared with glibenclamide. Clinicians should consider possible differences in risk of mortality when selecting a sulfonylurea.

FUNDING

None.

Observational studies of the association between glucose-lowering medications and cardiovascular outcomes: addressing methodological limitations

BACKGROUND

Recent years have witnessed a growing body of observational literature on the association between glucose-lowering treatments and cardiovascular disease. However, many of the studies are based on designs or analyses that inadequately address the methodological challenges involved.

METHODS

We reviewed recent observational literature on the association between glucose-lowering medications and cardiovascular outcomes and assessed the design and analysis methods used, with a focus on their ability to address specific methodological challenges. We describe and illustrate these methodological issues and their impact on observed associations, providing examples from the reviewed literature. We suggest approaches that may be employed to manage these methodological challenges.

RESULTS

From the evaluation of 81 publications of observational investigations assessing the association between glucose-lowering treatments and cardiovascular outcomes, we identified the following methodological challenges: 1) handling of temporality in administrative databases; 2) handling of risks that vary with time and treatment duration; 3) definitions of the exposure risk window; 4) handling of exposures that change over time; and 5) handling of confounding by indication. Most of these methodological challenges may be suitably addressed through application of appropriate methods.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Observational research plays an increasingly important role in the evaluation of the clinical effects of diabetes treatment. Implementation of appropriate research methods holds the promise of reducing the potential for spurious findings and the risk that the spurious findings will mislead the medical community about risks and benefits of diabetes medications.

Mortality outcomes of different sulphonylurea drugs: the results of a 14-year cohort study of type 2 diabetic patients

OBJECTIVE

Available data about mortality of type 2 diabetic patients treated with different sulphonylureas are scarce and contradictory.

DESIGN

We evaluated the associations between all-cause and cause-specific mortality and treatments with different sulphonylureas in a retrospective cohort of type 2 diabetic patients from a diabetes clinic.

METHODS

All 1277 patients treated with sulphonylureas during 19961997 were enrolled: 159 patients were treated with tolbutamide, 977 glibenclamide and 141 gliclazide. The baseline data (centralised laboratory parameters, anthropometric data and presence of chronic complications) were abstracted from the clinical records. Information on vital status was collected from demographic files after 14-year follow-up. Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were estimated with Cox (all-cause mortality) or Fine and Gray models (cause-specific mortality), including several potential confounders.

RESULTS

Five hundred and fifty-six patients died during the follow-up: 262 from cardiovascular causes, 158 from cancer and 136 from other causes. When compared with the glibenclamide users, the gliclazide and tolbutamide users showed a significantly lower cancer mortality (HR=0.30; 95% CI 0.16-0.55, and HR=0.48; 95% CI 0.29-0.79 respectively). These results were strongly confirmed in the 555 patients on sulphonylurea monotherapy. None of the patients who were treated with gliclazide monotherapy died from cancer during the follow-up, and the patients on tolbutamide treatment exhibited a lower cancer mortality than the glibenclamide users (HR=0.40; 95% CI 0.22-0.71). Data did not change after stratification for the duration of sulphonylurea treatment from diabetes diagnosis to the study enrollment.

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer mortality was markedly reduced in the patients on gliclazide and tolbutamide treatment. These results suggest additional benefits for these drugs beyond their blood glucose-lowering effect and strongly advocate for further investigation.

Medical management and strategies to prevent coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with increased immediate and long-term mortality compared with patients without T2DM. The amplified incidence of CAD stems partly from the aggregation of multiple risk factors, such as obesity, dyslipidemia, and hypertension, which occur in this population. In addition, there appear to be increased forces at play at the molecular and vascular levels in these individuals, which is evidenced by the increased thrombosis and inflammation that is seen in those with diabetic atherosclerosis. Hence, there is a growing need to emphasize early and vigilant risk factor management in patients with T2DM to help reduce their burden of cardiovascular-related mortality. In this article, we review the primary and secondary prevention measures as well as the management of CAD in patients with T2DM.

Blockers of sulfonylureas receptor 1 subunits may lead to cardiac protection against isoprenaline-induced injury in obese rats

Recent studies have found that blockers of sulfonylureas receptor 1(SUR1) might have cardiac ischemic protective effects. We evaluated the effects of a selective SUR1 blocker gliclazide on cardiac function and arrhythmia after isoprenaline-induced myocardial injury in obese rats. Diet-induced obese rats received isoprenaline or saline shots subcutaneously. Gliclazide or saline was given q12 h for 48 h to rats received isoprenaline. We measured ECG and hemodynamic parameters and collected blood samples for CK-MB, glucose and lipid profile determination, and then harvested hearts for water content, histological and immunohistochemical analysis and infarct size measurements. The obese rats' hearts receiving isoprenaline-induced myocardial injury showed up-regulated SUR-1 expression in the peri-microvascular area. Obese rats receiving gliclazide lavage had less severe arrhythmia (ASI: 4.00 ± 0.61 vs. 2.14 ± 0.39, P<0.05) and myocardial edema (water percentage: 85.16 ± 0.46% vs. 81.56 ± 0.57%, P<0.05). Less infarct size (47.6 ± 12.8% vs. 32.7 ± 9.1%, P<0.05) and improved diastolic function (LVEDP: 6.86 ± 0.85% vs. 2.51 ± 1.09%, P<0.05;-(dp/dt)(max): -1663.6 ± 387.91 mmHg/s vs. -2834.8 ± 290.76 mmHg/s, P<0.05) were also observed in rats receiving gliclazide lavage. Blocking of the SUR1 thus exerts a protective effect on the isoprenaline-induced myocardial injury in obese rats. That SUR1 blocker leads to ischemic protection suggesting a critical biological role of SUR1 in regulating the function of the cardiovascular system than previously recognized under pathophysiological conditions.