Increasing blood flow increases kt/V(urea) and potassium removal but fails to improve phosphate removal

Relationship between effective blood flow rate and clinical outcomes in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a single-center study

The association between blood flow rate (BFR) and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) is inconclusive. This retrospective study included 175 patients undergoing MHD treatment between July 2015 and March 2022, divided into two groups based on time-averaged effective blood flow rate (eBFR) median value. We investigated arteriovenous fistula (AVF) outcomes and the association of eBFR with all-cause mortality and new major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Mean ± SD and median time-averaged eBFR values were 276 ± 24 and 275 mL/min, respectively. After adjusting for relevant factors including age, sex, vintage, diabetes, CVD, receiving hemodiafiltration (HDF) treatment and spKt/V, Cox models indicated a low time-averaged eBFR (≤ 275 ml/min) was associated with increased risks of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 14.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.14-64.1) and new MACE (HR 3.76; 95% CI, 1.91-7.40) in MHD patients. Continuous Cox models demonstrated each 20 ml/min increase in eBFR linked to a 63% decrease in the risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.23-0.59) and a 38% decrease in the occurrence of new MACE (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.46-0.84). There was no significant difference in AVF outcomes between the two groups. Our study noted higher eBFR (>275 mL/min) is associated with lower risks of both all-cause mortality and new MACE compared with low eBFR (≤275 mL/min). Increased eBFR is not associated with a higher risk of AVF failure.

Comparison of modeled versus reported phosphate removal and modeled versus postdialysis serum phosphate levels in conventional hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

We compared predictions of phosphate removal by a 2-pool kinetic model with measured phosphate removal in spent dialysate as reported by others.

METHODS

Twenty-six studies were identified that reported phosphate removal in 35 groups of patients. In almost all studies, patients were dialyzed for close to 4 h (range 3 to 6 h). For each study, group mean values of predialysis serum phosphate, body size, dialyzer K₀ A urea, blood and dialysate flow rates, and session lengths were input into the kinetic model. Predictions of group mean phosphate removal and postdialysis serum phosphate were compared with reported measured values.

RESULTS

Mean (by patient group) predicted phosphate removal was 931 ± 170 mg/treatment, somewhat higher (p < 0.001) than the reported measured value, 900 mg ± 287. The ratio of predicted/measured removal averaged 1.15 ± 0.427. In 5/35 patient groups (3/26 studies) the predicted/measured phosphate removal was greater than 1.50. If these groups were excluded, the mean measured phosphate removal was 990 mg versus 966 predicted, with a ratio of predicted/measured removal averaging 0.993. Measured group mean postdialysis serum phosphate values (reported in 25/35) were 2.64 ± 0.54, not significantly different from predicted (2.60 ± 0.24 mg/dl, p = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

For conventional 4-h dialysis treatments, phosphate removal and postdialysis serum phosphate values predicted by a 2-pool kinetic model are similar to reported measured values.

Management of hyperkalemia: A focus on kidney transplant recipients

Hyperkalemia is a frequent complication among kidney transplant recipients that can lead to fatal arrhythmias. The causes of hyperkalemia post kidney transplant are multifactorial and often are drug-induced, and include decreased glomerular filtration rate, tubular dysfunction, and impaired sodium delivery in the distal nephron. This review will discuss pathophysiology and recent updates in the management of both acute and chronic hyperkalemia with a focus on kidney transplant recipients.

Kt/V: achievement, predictors and relationship to mortality in hemodialysis patients in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries: results from DOPPS (2012-18)

BACKGROUND

Dialysis adequacy, as measured by single pool Kt/V, is an important parameter for assessing hemodialysis (HD) patients' health. Guidelines have recommended Kt/V of 1.2 as the minimum dose for thrice-weekly HD. We describe Kt/V achievement, its predictors and its relationship with mortality in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) (Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates).

METHODS

We analyzed data (2012-18) from the prospective cohort Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study for 1544 GCC patients ≥18 years old and on dialysis >180 days.

RESULTS

Thirty-four percent of GCC HD patients had low Kt/V (<1.2) versus 5%-17% in Canada, Europe, Japan and the USA. Across the GCC countries, low Kt/V prevalence ranged from 10% to 54%. In multivariable logistic regression, low Kt/V was more common (P < 0.05) with larger body weight and height, being male, shorter treatment time (TT), lower blood flow rate (BFR), greater comorbidity burden and using HD versus hemodiafiltration. In adjusted Cox models, low Kt/V was strongly related to higher mortality in women [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-3.34] but not in men (HR = 1.16, 95% CI 0.70-1.92). Low BFR (<350 mL/min) and TT (<4 h) were common; 41% of low Kt/V cases were attributable to low BFR or TT (52% for women and 36% for men).

CONCLUSION

Relatively large proportions of GCC HD patients have low Kt/V. Increasing BFR to ≥350 mL/min and TT to ≥4 h thrice weekly will reduce low Kt/V prevalence and may improve survival in GCC HD patients-particularly among women.

Renal Association Clinical Practice Guideline on Haemodialysis

This guideline is written primarily for doctors and nurses working in dialysis units and related areas of medicine in the UK, and is an update of a previous version written in 2009. It aims to provide guidance on how to look after patients and how to run dialysis units, and provides standards which units should in general aim to achieve. We would not advise patients to interpret the guideline as a rulebook, but perhaps to answer the question: "what does good quality haemodialysis look like?"The guideline is split into sections: each begins with a few statements which are graded by strength (1 is a firm recommendation, 2 is more like a sensible suggestion), and the type of research available to back up the statement, ranging from A (good quality trials so we are pretty sure this is right) to D (more like the opinion of experts than known for sure). After the statements there is a short summary explaining why we think this, often including a discussion of some of the most helpful research. There is then a list of the most important medical articles so that you can read further if you want to - most of this is freely available online, at least in summary form.A few notes on the individual sections: 1. This section is about how much dialysis a patient should have. The effectiveness of dialysis varies between patients because of differences in body size and age etc., so different people need different amounts, and this section gives guidance on what defines "enough" dialysis and how to make sure each person is getting that. Quite a bit of this section is very technical, for example, the term "eKt/V" is often used: this is a calculation based on blood tests before and after dialysis, which measures the effectiveness of a single dialysis session in a particular patient. 2. This section deals with "non-standard" dialysis, which basically means anything other than 3 times per week. For example, a few people need 4 or more sessions per week to keep healthy, and some people are fine with only 2 sessions per week - this is usually people who are older, or those who have only just started dialysis. Special considerations for children and pregnant patients are also covered here. 3. This section deals with membranes (the type of "filter" used in the dialysis machine) and "HDF" (haemodiafiltration) which is a more complex kind of dialysis which some doctors think is better. Studies are still being done, but at the moment we think it's as good as but not better than regular dialysis. 4. This section deals with fluid removal during dialysis sessions: how to remove enough fluid without causing cramps and low blood pressure. Amongst other recommendations we advise close collaboration with patients over this. 5. This section deals with dialysate, which is the fluid used to "pull" toxins out of the blood (it is sometimes called the "bath"). The level of things like potassium in the dialysate is important, otherwise too much or too little may be removed. There is a section on dialysate buffer (bicarbonate) and also a section on phosphate, which occasionally needs to be added into the dialysate. 6. This section is about anticoagulation (blood thinning) which is needed to stop the circuit from clotting, but sometimes causes side effects. 7. This section is about certain safety aspects of dialysis, not seeking to replace well-established local protocols, but focussing on just a few where we thought some national-level guidance would be useful. 8. This section draws together a few aspects of dialysis which don't easily fit elsewhere, and which impact on how dialysis feels to patients, rather than the medical outcome, though of course these are linked. This is where home haemodialysis and exercise are covered. There is an appendix at the end which covers a few aspects in more detail, especially the mathematical ideas. Several aspects of dialysis are not included in this guideline since they are covered elsewhere, often because they are aspects which affect non-dialysis patients too. This includes: anaemia, calcium and bone health, high blood pressure, nutrition, infection control, vascular access, transplant planning, and when dialysis should be started.

Postdialysis Hypokalemia and All-Cause Mortality in Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Almost half of patients on dialysis demonstrate a postdialysis serum potassium ≤3.5 mEq/L. We aimed to examine the relationship between postdialysis potassium levels and all-cause mortality.

DESIGN, SETTING, PATIENTS, & MEASUREMENTS

We conducted a cohort study of 3967 participants on maintenance hemodialysis from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study in Japan (2009-2012 and 2012-2015). Postdialysis serum potassium was measured repeatedly at 4-month intervals and used as a time-varying variable. We estimated the hazard ratio of all-cause mortality rate using Cox hazard regression models, with and without adjusting for time-varying predialysis serum potassium. Models were adjusted for baseline characteristics and time-varying laboratory parameters. We also analyzed associations of combinations of pre- and postdialysis potassium with mortality.

RESULTS

The age of participants at baseline was 65±12 years (mean±SD), 2552 (64%) were men, and 96% were treated with a dialysate potassium level of 2.0 to <2.5 mEq/L. The median follow-up period was 2.6 (interquartile range, 1.3-2.8) years. During the follow-up period, 562 (14%) of 3967 participants died, and the overall mortality rate was 6.7 per 100 person-years. Compared with postdialysis potassium of 3.0 to <3.5 mEq/L, the hazard ratios of postdialysis hypokalemia (<3.0 mEq/L) were 1.84 (95% confidence interval, 1.44 to 2.34) in the unadjusted model, 1.44 (95% confidence interval, 1.14 to 1.82) in the model without adjusting for predialysis serum potassium, and 1.10 (95% confidence interval, 0.84 to 1.44) in the model adjusted for predialysis serum potassium. The combination of pre- and postdialysis hypokalemia was associated with the highest mortality risk (hazard ratio, 1.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.35 to 2.19, reference; pre- and postdialysis nonhypokalemia).

CONCLUSIONS

Postdialysis hypokalemia was associated with mortality, but this association was not independent of predialysis potassium.

The Effect of Increasing Blood Flow Rate on Severity of Uremic Pruritus in Hemodialysis Patients: A Single Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Although the prevalence of uremic pruritus has decreased compared to the past, the problem still remains as a matter of health and a major challenge of research in medical field, and has no effective treatment at present. This study aimed to investigate the effect of increasing blood flow rate on severity of uremic pruritus in hemodialysis patients in Iran.

METHODS

This clinical trial was performed on 60 hemodialysis patients that referred to hospitals affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences and these patients were selected through the convenience method and were treated for four weeks. They were divided into two groups of experimental and control as random allocation block, and studied for 4 weeks. Information on pruritus severity was collected using a researcher-made questionnaire in three steps of before intervention and two and four weeks after start of intervention. The rate of blood flow was increased in the first two weeks and the second two weeks by 25 and 50 rounds per minute (rpm) compared to the mean rate of blood flow of hemodialysis device in the last two sessions before intervention. Data were analyzed using the tests Mann-Whitney, Fisher, and t-test.

RESULTS

Analysis of data from 50 persons in both groups who completed the study revealed a significant difference between the groups in the severity of pruritus between the two sessions of hemodialysis (pruritus at home) at the end of the first two weeks of the intervention (<0.05) and the number of cases of pruritus (<0.05) at the end of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing blood flow for hemodialysis machine can induce significant statistical and clinical reduction in the severity and the frequency of pruritus in hemodialysis patients and can be help to be improve the quality of life of these persons by increased the blood flow rate.

Treatment of Hyperkalemia With a Low-Dose Insulin Protocol Is Effective and Results in Reduced Hypoglycemia

Introduction

Complications associated with insulin treatment for hyperkalemia are serious and common. We hypothesize that, in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD), giving 5 units instead of 10 units of i.v. regular insulin may reduce the risk of causing hypoglycemia when treating hyperkalemia.

Methods

A retrospective quality improvement study on hyperkalemia management (K⁺ ≥ 6 mEq/l) from June 2013 through December 2013 was conducted at an urban emergency department center. Electronic medical records were reviewed, and data were extracted on presentation, management of hyperkalemia, incidence and timing of hypoglycemia, and whether treatment was ordered as a protocol through computerized physician order entry (CPOE). We evaluated whether an educational effort to encourage the use of a protocol through CPOE that suggests the use of 5 units might be beneficial for CKD/ESRD patients. A second audit of hyperkalemia management from July 2015 through January 2016 was conducted to assess the effects of intervention on hypoglycemia incidence.

Results

Treatments ordered using a protocol for hyperkalemia increased following the educational intervention (58 of 78 patients [74%] vs. 62 of 99 patients [62%]), and the number of CKD/ESRD patients prescribed 5 units of insulin as per protocol increased (30 of 32 patients [93%] vs. 32 of 43 [75%], P = .03). Associated with this, the incidence of hypoglycemia associated with insulin treatment was lower (7 of 63 patients [11%] vs. 22 of 76 patients [28%], P = .03), and there were no cases of severe hypoglycemia compared to the 3 cases before the intervention.

Conclusion

Education on the use of a protocol for hyperkalemia resulted in a reduction in the number of patients with severe hypoglycemia associated with insulin treatment.

A novel mathematical model of protein-bound uremic toxin kinetics during hemodialysis

Protein-bound uremic toxins (PBUTs) are difficult to remove by conventional hemodialysis; a high degree of protein binding reduces the free fraction of toxins and decreases their diffusion across dialyzer membranes. Mechanistic understanding of PBUT kinetics can open new avenues to improve their dialytic removal. We developed a comprehensive model of PBUT kinetics that comprises: (1) a three-compartment patient model, (2) a dialyzer model. The model accounts for dynamic equilibrium between protein, toxin, and the protein-toxin complex. Calibrated and validated using clinical and experimental data from the literature, the model predicts key aspects of PBUT kinetics, including the free and bound concentration profiles for PBUTs and the effects of dialysate flow rate and dialyzer size on PBUT removal. Model simulations suggest that an increase in dialysate flow rate improves the reduction ratio (and removal) of strongly protein-bound toxins, namely, indoxyl sulfate and p-cresyl sulfate, while for weakly bound toxins, namely, indole-3-acetic acid and p-cresyl glucuronide, an increase in blood flow rate is advantageous. With improved dialyzer performance, removal of strongly bound PBUTs improves gradually, but marginally. The proposed model can be used for optimizing the dialysis regimen and for in silico testing of novel approaches to enhance removal of PBUTs.

The impact of blood flow rate during hemodialysis on all-cause mortality

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Inadequacy of dialysis is associated with morbidity and mortality in chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients. Blood flow rate (BFR) during HD is one of the important determinants of increasing dialysis dose. However, the optimal BFR is unclear. In this study, we investigated the impact of the BFR on all-cause mortality in chronic HD patients.

METHODS

Prevalent HD patients were selected from Clinical Research Center registry for end-stage renal disease cohort in Korea. We categorized patients into two groups by BFR < 250 and ≥ 250 mL/min according to the median value of BFR 250 mL/min in this study. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 1,129 prevalent HD patients were included. The number of patients in the BFR < 250 mL/min was 271 (24%) and in the BFR ≥ 250 mL/min was 858 (76%). The median follow-up period was 30 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with BFR < 250 mL/min than those with BFR ≥ 250 mL/min (p = 0.042, log-rank). In the multivariate Cox regression analyses, patients with BFR < 250 mL/min had higher all-cause mortality than those with BFR ≥ 250 mL/min (hazard ratio, 1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.00 to 2.73; p = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data showed that BFR < 250 mL/min during HD was associated with higher all-cause mortality in chronic HD patients.

Potassium kinetics during hemodialysis

Hyperkalemia in hemodialysis patients is associated with high mortality, but prescription of low dialysate potassium concentrations to decrease serum potassium levels is associated with a high incidence of sudden cardiac arrest or sudden death. Improved clinical outcomes for these patients may be possible if rapid and substantial intradialysis decreases in serum potassium concentration can be avoided while maintaining adequate potassium removal. Data from kinetic modeling sessions during the HEMO Study of the dependence of serum potassium concentration on time during hemodialysis treatments and 30 minutes postdialysis were evaluated using a pseudo one-compartment model. Kinetic estimates of potassium mobilization clearance (K(M)) and predialysis central distribution volume (V(pre)) were determined in 551 hemodialysis patients. The studied patients were 58.8 ± 14.4 years of age with predialysis body weight of 72.1 ± 15.1 kg; 306 (55.4%) of the patients were female and 337 (61.2%) were black. K(M) and V(pre) for all patients were non-normally distributed with values of 158 (111, 235) (median [interquartile range]) mL/min and 15.6 (11.4, 22.8) L, respectively. K(M) was independent of dialysate potassium concentration (P > 0.2), but V(pre) was lower at higher dialysate potassium concentration (R = -0.188, P < 0.001). For patients with dialysate potassium concentration between 1.6 and 2.5 mEq/L (N = 437), multiple linear regression of K(M) and V(pre) demonstrated positive association with predialysis body weight and negative association with predialysis serum potassium concentration. Potassium kinetics during hemodialysis can be described using a pseudo one-compartment model.

Principles and operational parameters to optimize poison removal with extracorporeal treatments

A role for nephrologists in the management of a poisoned patient involves evaluating the indications for, and methods of, enhancing the elimination of a poison. Nephrologists are familiar with the various extracorporeal treatments (ECTRs) used in the management of impaired kidney function, and their respective advantages and disadvantages. However, these same skills and knowledge may not always be considered, or applicable, when prescribing ECTR for the treatment of a poisoned patient. Maximizing solute elimination is a key aim of such treatments, perhaps more so than in the treatment of uremia, because ECTR has the potential to reverse clinical toxicity and shorten the duration of poisoning. This manuscript reviews the various principles that govern poison elimination by ECTR (diffusion, convection, adsorption, and centrifugation) and how components of the ECTR can be adjusted to maximize clearance. Data supporting these recommendations will be presented, whenever available.

Patient education for phosphorus management in chronic kidney disease

OBJECTIVES

This review explores the challenges and solutions in educating patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) to lower serum phosphorus while avoiding protein insufficiency and hypercalcemia.

METHODS

A literature search including terms "hyperphosphatemia," "patient education," "food fatigue," "hypercalcemia," and "phosphorus-protein ratio" was undertaken using PubMed.

RESULTS

Hyperphosphatemia is a strong predictor of mortality in advanced CKD and is remediated via diet, phosphorus binders, and dialysis. Dietary counseling should encourage the consumption of foods with the least amount of inorganic or absorbable phosphorus, low phosphorus-to-protein ratios, and adequate protein content, and discourage excessive calcium intake in high-risk patients. Emerging educational initiatives include food labeling using a "traffic light" scheme, motivational interviewing techniques, and the Phosphate Education Program - whereby patients no longer have to memorize the phosphorus content of each individual food component, but only a "phosphorus unit" value for a limited number of food groups. Phosphorus binders are associated with a clear survival advantage in CKD patients, overcome the limitations associated with dietary phosphorus restriction, and permit a more flexible approach to achieving normalization of phosphorus levels.

CONCLUSION

Patient education on phosphorus and calcium management can improve concordance and adherence and empower patients to collaborate actively for optimal control of mineral metabolism.

Phosphate mass removal during hemodialysis: a comparison between eKT/V-matched conventional and extended dialysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The control of hyperphosphatemia is an unmet need in dialysis care. Compared to conventional hemodialysis (cHD), extended hemodialysis (eHD) appears to more easily control blood phosphate levels in chronically dialyzed patients. Here, we sought to compare eKT/V-matched cHD and eHD procedures in order to quantify the contribution of dialysis prescription and time in the mass removal of phosphate.

METHODS

Eight stable hemodialysis patients with negligible residual renal function underwent cHD and eHD sessions adjusted to provide the same eKT/V(urea). Total dialysate, total and hourly partial dialysate and blood samples were collected for comparison of mass extraction of urea, creatinine, and phosphate.

RESULTS

Mean eKT/V(urea) was similar in eHD and cHD (1.30 vs. 1.28, p = nonsignificant). Likewise, mass removal of urea and creatinine during cHD and eHD were not significantly different. Conversely, phosphate mass removal was 40% higher with eHD as compared to cHD (1,219 ± 262 vs. 858 ± 186 mg, p = 0.015). Although hourly mass removal of phosphate was higher during cHD, the prolonged period of lesser but continuous removal was responsible for higher total phosphate elimination during eHD.

CONCLUSION

In dialysis sessions matched to provide a similar eKT/V(urea), removal of phosphate increases by 40% when time is extended from 4 to 8 h. Urea-based adequacy models cannot be used to predict the amount of phosphorus removal during hemodialysis.

Phosphate removal model: an observational study of low-flux dialyzers in conventional hemodialysis therapy

Precise assessing phosphate removal by hemodialysis (HD) is important to improve phosphate control in patients on maintenance HD. We reported a simple noninvasive model to estimate phosphate removal within a 4-hour HD. One hundred sixty-five patients who underwent HD 4 hours per session using low-flux dialyzers made of polysulfone (1.2 m(2)) or triacetate (1.3 m(2)) were enrolled. Blood flows varied from 180 to 300 mL/min. Effluent dialysate samples were collected during the 4-hour HD treatment to measure the total phosphate removal. Predialysis levels of serum phosphate, potassium, hematocrit, intact parathyroid hormone, total carbon dioxide (TCO(2)), alkaline phosphatase, clinical and dialysis characteristics were obtained. One hundred thirty-five observations were randomly selected for model building and the remaining 30 for model validation. Total amount of phosphate removal within the 4-hour HD was mostly 15-30 mmol. A primary model (model 1) predicting total phosphate removal was Tpo(4)  = 79.6 × C(45) (mmol/L) - 0.023 × age (years) + 0.065 × weight (kg) - 0.12 × TCO(2) (mmol/L) + 0.05 × clearance (mL/min) - 3.44, where C(45) was phosphate concentration in spent dialysate measured at the 45 minute of HD and clearance was phosphate clearance of dialyzer in vitro conditions offered by manufacturer's data sheet. Since the parameter TCO(2) needed serum sample for measurement, we further derived a noninvasive model (model 2):Tpo(4)  = 80.3 × C(45)  - 0.024 × age + 0.07 × weight + 0.06 × clearance - 8.14. Coefficient of determination, root mean square error, and residual plots showed the appropriateness of two models. Model validation further suggested good and similar predictive ability of them. This study derived a noninvasive model to predict phosphate removal. It applies to patients treated by 4-hour HD under similar conditions.

Nocturnal hemodialysis: effects on solute clearance, quality of life, and patient survival

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Conventional hemodialysis is often an incomplete treatment for uremia. People receiving hemodialysis often report a poor quality of life and suffer from an accelerated mortality rate. Nocturnal hemodialysis provides long treatments at night in the home or dialysis center. This review will examine how long nocturnal treatments have impact on the clearance of small and larger retention products, and how these treatments influence quality of life and survival.

RECENT FINDINGS

Nocturnal hemodialysis is more effective at clearing most small and middle molecule retention products, and has been associated with improvements in quality of life, especially in those domains related to the effects of kidney disease. Survival on nocturnal hemodialysis is higher than expected, and studies suggest that patients receiving nocturnal hemodialysis have a mortality rate that is about one third of what is seen in similar patients receiving conventional hemodialysis.

SUMMARY

Although impressive, it is difficult to be sure how much of the results of these studies is due to the duration and timing of dialysis and how much relates to patient level factors and residual confounding, and further research in this area is required.

Hyperphosphatemia in Renal Failure

The recent recognition that hyperphosphatemia is a strong predictor of survival on dialysis has rekindled interest in the regulation and control of serum phosphate. In incipient renal failure hyperphosphatemia is prevented by increased fractional renal phosphate excretion mediated via an increase in parathyroid hormone and the novel phosphaturic hormone FGF-23 (and possibly others). At a glomerular filtration rate of approximately 30 ml/min this compensatory mechanism fails and hyperphosphatemia ensues. Pre-dialytic serum phosphate concentrations of >6 mg/dl increase cardiac mortality presumably to a large extent, but not exclusively, via promoting vascular calcification. It has recently been recognized that vascular calcification is not only a passive precipitation process following transgression of the critical Ca-x-P product, but is an active process accompanied by expression of osteoblastic bone markers in the vessel wall. Because of the recent recognition of the relation between vascular calcification and serum phosphate as well as serum calcium, there is a need for novel calcium-free phosphate binders. Currently sevelamer and lanthanum carbonate have been introduced and trivalent iron preparations are under development.

The effect of dialysis modality on phosphate control : haemodialysis compared to haemodiafiltration. The Pan Thames Renal Audit

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Hyperphosphataemia is a primary risk factor for patients with end-stage kidney failure. Phosphate clearance by traditional thrice-weekly standard haemodialysis is inadequate for patients achieving recommended dietary protein goals. We investigated whether phosphate control was improved by adding convective clearance with haemodiafiltration.

METHODS

We audited pre-midweek session calcium and phosphate levels in 5366 adult patients, 4515 treated by haemodialysis and 851 by on-line haemodiafiltration.

RESULTS

The cohorts were similar for age, sex and dialysis vintage. Serum phosphate was lower in the haemodiafiltration cohort (1.42 +/- 0.61 mmol/l) compared to the haemodialysis cohort (1.53 +/- 0.53 mmol/l; P < 0.001), as was the calcium-phosphate product (3.31 +/- 1.53 vs 3.5 +/- 1.33 mmol(2)/l(2), respectively; P < 0.001) despite a shorter treatment session time (3.68 +/- 0.44 vs 3.92 +/- 0.49 h; P < 0.001). Parathyroid hormone levels were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this audit suggest that haemodiafiltration offers improved phosphate control compared to standard intermittent haemodialysis.

Management of hyperkalemia in dialysis patients

Hyperkalemia is common in patients with end-stage renal disease, and may result in serious electrocardiographic abnormalities. Dialysis is the definitive treatment of hyperkalemia in these patients. Intravenous calcium is used to stabilize the myocardium. Intravenous insulin and nebulized albuterol lower serum potassium acutely, by shifting it into the cells. Despite their widespread use, neither intravenous bicarbonate nor cation exchange resins are effective in lowering serum potassium acutely. Prevention of hyperkalemia currently rests largely upon dietary compliance and avoidance of medications that may promote hyperkalemia. Prolonged fasting may provoke hyperkalemia, which can be prevented by administration of intravenous dextrose.

Dietary phosphate restriction and protein intake in dialysis patients: a misdirected focus

Efforts at controlling hyperphosphatemia in dialysis patients have been largely unsuccessful. Phosphate removal in thrice-weekly standard dialysis is limited due to the largely time-dependent basis for its removal. Phosphate binders, while highly useful, have not solved the problem. Dietary restriction of phosphate beyond dairy products and a few selected foodstuffs has been underemphasized. This is because of the incorrect belief that substantial reductions in dietary phosphate can only be achieved at the cost of potentially harmful levels of protein restriction. In fact, phosphate-containing food additives are a highly significant source of dietary phosphate and are absorbed to a much greater extent than organic phosphates, making them a target of great therapeutic potential. A considerable reduction in costs, morbidity, and mortality could result from a concerted effort to control this source of dietary phosphate.

Practical Approaches to Management of Hyperphosphatemia: Can We Improve the Current Situation?

Despite advanced technology and regular and efficient dialysis treatment, the prevalence of hyperphosphatemia still is unacceptably high. Nevertheless, a neutral phosphorus balance level can generally be achieved by optimization of dialysis prescription in combination with individualized dietary and medical strategies. Besides increasing the fraction of inorganic phosphate (iP) removed by convection through the application of hemodiafiltration, extension of daily or weekly treatment time is the most promising way to neutralize phosphorus balance. Dietary phosphate restriction, the second corner stone of phosphate management, bears the risk of development of protein malnutrition. Phosphate binders (PBs) effectively reduce intestinal iP absorption, but are mostly dosed inadequately in relation to meal phosphorus content. Phosphate management may be substantially improved by enabling patients to self-adjust the PB dose to individual meal phosphate content, similar to self-adjusting insulin dose to carbohydrate intake by diabetics. A recently developed Phosphate Education Program (PEP) provides simple training tools to instruct patients to eye-estimate meal phosphorus content based on newly defined phosphorus units instead of milligrams. PEP is the first approach applying the concept of patient empowerment in the management of hyperphosphatemia in dialysis patients.

Management of hyperphosphatemia

Hyperphosphatemia is a well recognized risk factor for cardiovascular mortality in dialysis patients. Despite advanced technology and regular and efficient dialysis treatment the prevalence of hyperphosphatemia is still high. The goal of normalization of serum phosphorus (iP) levels can only be reached by optimization of dialysis prescription in combination with individualized dietary and medical strategies. Due to the unique characteristics of intradialytic iP kinetics, dialysis treatment time and frequency are the most effective factors governing intradialytic iP removal. Although the combination of diffusive and convective removal by hemodiafiltration allows a further increase in iP mass removal, a neutral phosphorus balance without dietary restrictions and the use of phosphate binders has only be achieved by daily nocturnal hemodialysis. Strict dietary phosphate restriction bears the risk of inadequate protein intake and the development of protein/calorie malnutrition. Although phosphate binders (PB) can effectively lower serum iP levels into the normal range, this is rarely achieved in clinical practice probably due to inadequate relation of PB dose to dietary phosphorus intake. Developing methods to enable patients to self-adjust phosphate binder dose to individual meal phosphate content, similar to adjusting insulin dose to carbohydrate intake, may lead to further improvements in phosphate management.

Dialyzer Clearances and Mass Transfer-Area Coefficients for Small Solutes at Low Dialysate Flow Rates

New daily hemodialysis therapies operate at low dialysate flow rates to minimize dialysate volume requirements; however, the dependence of dialyzer clearances and mass transfer-area coefficients for small solutes on dialysate flow rate under these conditions have not been studied extensively. We evaluated in vitro dialyzer clearances for urea and creatinine at dialysate flow rates of 40, 80, 120, 160, and 200 ml/min and ultrafiltration flow rates of 0, 1, and 2 l/h, using a dialyzer containing PUREMA membranes (NxStage Medical, Lawrence, MA). Clearances were measured directly across the dialyzer by perfusing bovine blood with added urea and creatinine single pass through the dialyzer at a nominal blood flow rate of 400 ml/min. Limited, additional studies were performed with the use of dialyzers containing PUREMA membranes at a blood flow rate of 200 ml/min and also with the use of other dialyzers containing polysulfone membranes (Optiflux 160NR, FMC-NA, Ogden, UT) and dialyzers containing Synphan membranes (NxStage Medical). For dialyzers containing PUREMA membranes, urea and creatinine clearances increased (p < 0.001) with increasing dialysate and ultrafiltration flow rates but were not different at blood flow rates of 200 and 400 ml/min. Dialysate saturation, defined as dialysate outlet concentration divided by blood water inlet concentration, for urea and creatinine was independent of blood and ultrafiltration flow rate but varied inversely (p < 0.001) with dialysate flow rate. Mass transfer-area coefficients for urea and creatinine were independent of blood and ultrafiltration flow rate but decreased (p < 0.001) with decreasing dialysate flow rate. Calculated mass transfer-area coefficients at low dialysate flow rates for all dialyzers tested were substantially lower than those reported by the manufacturers under conventional conditions. We conclude that dialyzers require specific characterization under relevant conditions if they are used in novel daily hemodialysis therapies at low dialysate flow rate.

Potassium disorders—clinical spectrum and emergency management

Potassium disorders are common and may precipitate cardiac arrhythmias or cardiopulmonary arrest. They are an anticipated complication in patients with renal failure, but may also occur in patients with no previous history of renal disease. They have a broad clinical spectrum of presentation and this paper will highlight the life-threatening arrhythmias associated with both hyperkalaemia and hypokalaemia. Although the medical literature to date has provided a foundation for the therapeutic options available, this has not translated into consistent medical practice. Treatment algorithms have undoubtedly been useful in the management of other medical emergencies such as cardiac arrest and acute asthma. Hence, we have applied this strategy to the treatment of hyperkalaemia and hypokalaemia which may prove valuable in clinical practice.

New Method for Phosphate Kinetics Estimation during Hemodialysis and On-Line Hemodiafiltration with Endogenous Reinfusion

AIM

The purpose of this study was to optimize the operative and analytical methodologies to a more exact determination of intradialytic kinetics of the phosphates (P) tested in hemodialysis (HD) and in on-line hemodiafiltration with endogenous reinfusion (HFR - Hemo Filtrate Reinfusion).

METHODS

The mass balance measurements of urea and P were carried out in 18 clinically stable HD patients. The effective blood flow (Qb) was measured with a Transonic monitor. The plasma was deproteinized with 10% trichloroacetic acid to prevent breakdown of the proteins and the consequent pseudohyperphosphatemia. Subsequently the supernatant containing the ultrafiltrable phosphates was made to react with a solution of ammonium molybdate for a spectrophotometric reading.

RESULTS

The mean urea mass transfer in HD was 16.9 g/session and in HFR 15.4 g/session. The mean P mass transfer in HD was 726 mg/session and in HFR 679 mg/session. Nevertheless, in HFR a significant difference was verified between the clearances of P, between the plasma water side (122.4 +/- 30.8 ml/min) and the dialysate side (105.9 +/- 19.4 ml/min).

CONCLUSION

As far as the P mass transfer is concerned, the data obtained is able to be superimposed with that described in the literature during HD, while in HFR it is possible to hypothesize a high efficiency, thanks to an increased output of P in relation to the phenomenon of adsorption which, although is limited, contributes to the transfer of the total mass. Based on this study and re-examining the literature on P kinetics, there is space for methodological improvement both on the operating front with careful determination of the effective Qb, and on the chemical front overcoming the inaccuracy of automatic analyzers in determining the plasma P owing to possible overestimation of phosphatemia and poor sensitivity in measuring the lower levels of P present in the dialysate and/or ultrafiltrate.

Kinetics of β2-Microglobulin and Phosphate during Hemodialysis: Effects of Treatment Frequency and Duration

Current understanding of beta2-microglobulin (beta2M) and phosphate (or inorganic phosphorus) kinetics during hemodialysis is reviewed. The postdialysis:predialysis concentration ratio for beta2M is determined by dialyzer clearance for beta2M, treatment time, patient body size (specifically, extracellular fluid volume), and total ultrafiltration volume during the treatment. Evaluation of these treatment parameters can be used to calculate dialyzer clearance for beta2M; however, such calculated values are only approximations, since they neglect intradialytic generation, nonrenal (nondialyzer) clearance, and postdialysis rebound of beta2M. The detailed kinetics of beta2M during hemodialysis are best described using a two-compartment model. Theoretical predictions from such two-compartment models suggest that the product of dialyzer clearance for beta2M and weekly treatment duration, independent of treatment frequency, is the main determinant of plasma beta2M concentrations. The kinetics of phosphate removal during hemodialysis are incompletely understood. Phosphate is removed from both extracellular and intracellular compartments during hemodialysis; the plasma phosphate concentration levels off after the first 1 or 2 hours of treatment and plasma concentrations can rebound even before therapy is complete. Increases in dialyzer clearance of phosphate have been previously achieved only by increasing dialysis membrane surface area or by the use of hemodiafiltration. A four-compartment model of phosphate kinetics proposed recently by Spalding et al. suggests that the major barrier to phosphate removal is limited transfer of phosphate between the intracellular and extracellular compartments, although other complex factors also play important roles. Theoretical predictions using the model of Spalding et al. suggest that increasing either treatment frequency or treatment duration can increase phosphate removal. The kinetics of beta2M are representative of middle molecules whose removal during hemodialysis is governed predominantly by clearance at the dialyzer. In contrast, phosphate removal is limited primarily by its sequestration in the intracellular compartment (and possibly other compartments), not by its clearance at the dialyzer. The kinetics of phosphate may therefore be representative of uremic toxins whose removal is limited by sequestration into compartments or by protein binding. Enhanced removal of both of these uremic toxins using a given therapy will require treatments of increased frequency and longer duration.

Emergency interventions for hyperkalaemia

BACKGROUND

Hyperkalaemia occurs in outpatients and in between 1% and 10% of hospitalised patients. When severe, consequences include arrhythmia and death.

OBJECTIVES

To review randomised evidence informing the emergency (i.e. acute, rather than chronic) management of hyperkalaemia

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched MEDLINE (1966-2003), EMBASE (1980-2003), The Cochrane Library (issue 4, 2003), and SciSearch using the text words hyperkal* or hyperpotass* (* indicates truncation). We also searched selected journals and abstracts of meetings. The reference lists of recent review articles, textbooks, and relevant papers were reviewed for additional potentially relevant titles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All selection was performed in duplicate. Articles were considered relevant if they were randomised, quasi-randomised or cross-over randomised studies of pharmacological or other interventions to treat non-neonatal humans with hyperkalaemia, reporting on clinically-important outcomes, or serum potassium levels within the first six hours of administration.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

All data extraction was performed in duplicate. We extracted quality information, and details of the patient population, intervention, baseline and follow-up potassium values. We extracted information about arrhythmias, mortality and adverse effects. Where possible, meta-analysis was performed using random effects models.

MAIN RESULTS

None of the studies of clinically-relevant hyperkalaemia reported mortality or cardiac arrhythmias. Reports focussed on serum potassium levels. Many studies were small, and not all intervention groups had sufficient data for meta-analysis to be performed. On the basis of small studies, inhaled beta-agonists, nebulised beta-agonists, and intravenous (IV) insulin-and-glucose were all effective, and the combination of nebulised beta agonists with IV insulin-and-glucose was more effective than either alone. Dialysis is effective. Results were equivocal for IV bicarbonate. K-absorbing resin was not effective by four hours, and longer follow up data on this intervention were not available from RCTs.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Nebulised or inhaled salbutamol, or IV insulin-and-glucose are the first-line therapies for the management of emergency hyperkalaemia that are best supported by the evidence. Their combination may be more effective than either alone, and should be considered when hyperkalaemia is severe. When arrhythmias are present, a wealth of anecdotal and animal data suggests that IV calcium is effective in treating arrhythmia. Further studies of the optimal use of combination treatments and of the adverse effects of treatments are needed.

Biochemical and Clinical Evidence for Uremic Toxicity

The uremic syndrome is a mix of clinical features resulting from multiple organ dysfunctions which develop when kidney failure progresses, and is attributed to the retention of solutes, which under normal conditions are excreted by the healthy kidneys into the urine. The most practical classification of uremic solutes is based on their physicochemical characteristics that influence their dialytic removal, in (1) small water soluble compounds, (2) the larger "middle molecules," and (3) the protein bound compounds. Hence, uremic retention is much more complex than originally believed. Among the small water soluble compounds, urea exerts not much toxic activity and is not very representative in its kinetic behavior for many other uremic solutes. Among the middle molecules, many have been recognized to exert biological activity and hence to contribute to the uremic syndrome. Specific dialysis strategies apply large pore membranes to remove those middle molecules and have a beneficial impact on uremic morbidity and mortality. A substantial number of uremic solutes are protein bound. Only recently, a relation between their concentration and clinical status could be demonstrated. Likewise, it was only recently possible to demonstrate more than standard removal with super-flux dialysis membranes. To further improve characterization of uremic solutes and to develop directed therapeutic approaches, further concerted action among various groups of researchers will be needed.