The Results of Two-stage Revision for Methicillin-resistant Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) of the Hip

Characterizing recurrent infections after one-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection of the knee: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the knee represents a severe complication after 1.5% to 2% of primary total knee replacement. Although two-stage revision was considered the gold-standard treatment for PJI of the knee, in the last decades, more studies reported the outcomes of one-stage revisions. This systematic review aims to assess reinfection rate, infection-free survival after reoperation for recurrent infection, and the microorganisms involved in both primary and recurrent infection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic review of all studies reporting the outcome of one-stage revision for PJI of the knee up to September 2022, according to PRISMA criteria and AMSTAR2 guidelines, was performed. Patient demographics, clinical, surgical, and postoperative data were recorded.

PROSPERO ID

CRD42022362767.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies with a total of 881 one-stage revisions for PJI of the knee were analyzed. A reinfection rate of 12.2% after an average follow-up of 57.6 months was reported. The most frequent causative microorganism were gram-positive bacteria (71.1%), gram-negative bacteria (7.1%), and polymicrobial infections (8%). The average postoperative knee society score was 81.5, and the average postoperative knee function score was 74.2. The infection-free survival after treatment for recurrent infection was 92.1%. The causative microorganisms at reinfections differed significantly from the primary infection (gram-positive 44.4%, gram-negative 11.1%).

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent a one-stage revision for PJI of the knee showed a reinfection rate lower or comparable to other surgical treatments as two-stage or DAIR (debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention). Reoperation for reinfection demonstrates a lower success compared to one-stage revision. Moreover, microbiology differs between primary infection and recurrent infection. Level of evidence Level IV.

Increased Incidence of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Knee and Hip Prosthetic Joint Infection

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication of knee and hip arthroplasty. Past literature has shown that gram-positive bacteria are commonly responsible for these infections, although limited research exists studying the changes in the microbial profile of PJIs over time. This study sought to analyze the incidence and trends of pathogens responsible for PJI over three decades.

METHODS

This is a multi-institutional retrospective review of patients who had a knee or hip PJI from 1990 to 2020. Patients with a known causative organism were included and those with insufficient culture sensitivity data were excluded. There were 731 eligible joint infections from 715 patients identified. Organisms were divided into multiple categories based on genus/species and 5-year increments were used to analyze the study period. The Cochran-Armitage trend tests were used to evaluate linear trends in microbial profile over time and a P-value <.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant positive linear trend in the incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus over time (P = .0088) as well as a statistically significant negative linear trend in the incidence of coagulase-negative staphylococci over time (P = .0018). There was no statistical significance between organism and affected joint (knee/hip).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus PJI is increasing over time, whereas, coagulase-negative staphylococci PJI is decreasing, paralleling the global trend of antibiotic resistance. Identifying these trends may help with the prevention and treatment of PJI through methods such as remodeling perioperative protocols, modifying prophylactic/empiric antimicrobial approaches, or transitioning to alternative therapeutic strategies.

Time to Positivity of Cultures Obtained for Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BACKGROUND

Despite its well-established limitations, culture remains the gold standard for microbial identification in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, there are no benchmarks for the time to positivity (TTP) on culture for specific microorganisms. This study aimed to determine the TTP for pathogens commonly encountered in PJI.

METHODS

This retrospective, multicenter study reviewed prospectively maintained institutional PJI databases to identify patients who underwent hip or knee revision arthroplasty from 2017 to 2021 at 2 tertiary centers in the United States and Germany. Only patients who met the 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria for PJI and had a positive intraoperative culture were included. TTP on culture media was recorded for each sample taken intraoperatively. The median TTP was compared among different microbial species and different specimen types. Data are presented either as the mean and the standard deviation or as the median and the interquartile range (IQR).

RESULTS

A total of 536 ICM-positive patients with positive cultures were included. The mean number of positive cultures per patient was 3.9 ± 2.6. The median TTP, in days, for all positive cultures was 3.3 (IQR, 1.9 to 5.4). Overall, gram-negative organisms (TTP, 1.99 [1.1 to 4.1]; n = 225) grew significantly faster on culture compared with gram-positive organisms (TTP, 3.33 [1.9 to 5.8]; n = 1,774). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (TTP, 1.42 [1.0 to 2.8]; n = 85) had the fastest TTP, followed by gram-negative rods (TTP, 1.92 [1.0 to 3.9]; n = 163), methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (TTP, 1.95 [1.1 to 3.3] n = 393), Streptococcus species (TTP, 2.92 [1.2 to 4.3]; n = 230), Staphylococcus epidermidis (TTP, 4.20 [2.4 to 5.5]; n = 555), Candida species (TTP, 5.30 [3.1 to 10]; n = 63), and Cutibacterium acnes (TTP, 6.97 [5.9 to 8.2]; n = 197). When evaluating the median TTP according to specimen type, synovial fluid (TTP, 1.97 [1.1 to 3.1]; n = 112) exhibited the shortest TTP, followed by soft tissue (TTP, 3.17 [1.4 to 5.3]; n = 1,199) and bone (TTP, 4.16 [2.3 to 5.9]; n = 782).

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the TTP of common microorganisms that are known to cause PJI. Increased awareness of these data may help to guide the selection of appropriate antimicrobial therapy and to predict treatment outcomes in the future. Nonetheless, additional studies with larger cohorts are needed to validate these benchmarks.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic infection after hip replacement (a review)

Introduction. The frequency of hip arthroplasty is steadily increasing throughout the world and, although this operation has become routine, the likelihood of postoperative complications reaches 4.3 % [1]. The most dangerous of them are infectious lesions in the area of the endoprosthesis and adjacent tissues. At the same time, in addition to the threat of generalization of the infectious process, there are functional disorders in the joint area and a general deterioration in the quality of life of the patient. Timely diagnosis and treatment of the infectious process and related disorders can minimize the adverse effects of infection.

Target. The purpose of this review is to analyze modern methods for diagnosing and treating periprosthetic infection resulting from hip replacement.

Materials and methods. The subject literature was searched using the PubMed and Google Sholar databases.

Results. The main methods for diagnosing periprosthetic infection include histological and bacteriological examination of the biopsy specimen, determination of sensitivity to antibiotics, blood, and synovial fluid analysis for the content of leukocytes, IL-6, CRP, PCR diagnostics of infectious agents. Treatment consists of re-intervention and/or antibiotic therapy.

Conclusion. The most optimal method for diagnosing periprosthetic infection is a bacteriological study of biopsy specimens taken intraoperatively. The preferred method of treatment is determined by the severity of the infection, the degree of involvement of tissues adjacent to the prosthesis, the comorbid background, the nature of the infectious agent, and includes repeated revision surgery.

The Creation of Articulating Cement Spacer Using Custom-Fabricated Silicone Mold for the Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Two Case Reports

Joint replacement surgeries have been performed to treat joint arthropathies with excellent outcomes. As the number of joint replacement surgeries surges, the incidence of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has also increased. Currently, two-stage revision surgery is the gold standard in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection. Two-stage revision surgery involves joint washout, the removal of the primary implant, the insertion of a cement spacer, and subsequently the reimplantation of prosthesis after the infection has been eliminated. Custom-made articulating cement spacer has been used with success to improve the patient's ambulatory status and quality of life. Nevertheless, custom-made articulating cement spacer or commercialized cement mold is generally costly. By the modification of previous authors' techniques, we manage to fabricate reusable silicone molds, which can be used to create articulating cement spacers for both hip and knee joints. We share two case reports to illustrate how these fabricated silicone molds can be a cost-effective technique to create articulating cement spacers to manage periprosthetic joint infection in both hip and knee joints. Surgeons in resource-deprived countries can utilize this technique to create articulating cement spacers with minimal cost, but they need to discuss with their patients and check with the local regulatory board on the feasibility of this technique to create cement spacer that will be used in a patient.

Prosthetic joint infection of the hip and knee due to Mycobacterium species: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Mycobacterium species (Mycobacterium sp) is an emerging cause of hip and knee prosthetic joint infection (PJI), and different species of this organism may be responsible for the same.

AIM

To evaluate the profile of hip and knee Mycobacterium PJI cases as published in the past 30 years.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in PubMed using the MeSH terms “Prosthesis joint infection” AND “Mycobacterium” for studies with publication dates from January 1, 1990, to May 30, 2021. To avoid missing any study, another search was performed with the terms “Arthroplasty infection” AND “Mycobacterium” in the same period as the previous search. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses chart was used to evaluate the included studies for further review. In total, 51 studies were included for further evaluation of the cases, type of pathogen, and treatment of PJI caused by Mycobacterium sp.

RESULTS

Seventeen identified Mycobacterium sp were reportedly responsible for hip/knee PJI in 115 hip/knee PJI cases, whereas in two cases there was no mention of any specific Mycobacterium sp. Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) was detected in 50/115 (43.3%) of the cases. Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) included M. fortuitum (26/115, 22.6%), M. abscessus (10/115, 8.6%), M. chelonae (8/115, 6.9%), and M. bovis (8/115, 6.9%). Majority of the cases (82/114, 71.9%) had an onset of infection > 3 mo after the index surgery, while in 24.6% (28/114) the disease had an onset in ≤ 3 mo. Incidental intraoperative PJI diagnosis was made in 4 cases (3.5%). Overall, prosthesis removal was needed in 77.8% (84/108) of the cases to treat the infection. Overall infection rate was controlled in 88/102 (86.3%) patients with Mycobacterium PJI. Persistent infection occurred in 10/108 (9.8%) patients, while 4/108 (3.9%) patients died due to the infection.

CONCLUSION

At least 17 Mycobacterium sp can be responsible for hip/knee PJI. Although M. tuberculosis is the most common causal pathogen, NTM should be considered as an emerging cause of hip/knee PJI.

The Fate of Periprosthetic Joint Infection With Corynebacterium striatum: A Rare but Catastrophic Causative Organism

BACKGROUND

The virulence and antibiotic resistance profile of an infecting organism have been shown to impact the outcomes of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, there are no existing data on the outcomes of PJI caused by Corynebacterium striatum, a rare organism. Thus, our objective is to ascertain: (1) the treatment success of PJI caused by this rare organism and (2) patient characteristics in the setting of C striatum PJI.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on 741 consecutive PJIs managed at 2 hospital facilities by 8 surgeons (February 4, 2015 to October 30, 2019). The inclusion criteria represented the presence of minimum 1 positive culture of C. striatum. After excluding 1 patient with no follow-up, 15 patients were finally analyzed (9 hips/6 knees). Out of 15 patients, 9 underwent explantation with spacer insertion, 5 underwent irrigation and debridement with polyexchange (I&D), and 1 underwent Girdlestone. Out of 9 explanted patients, only 6 cleared infection and were reimplanted. The clinical staging system for PJI was determined using McPherson classification. The mean follow-ups for I&D and explantation were 35 and 23.5 months, respectively. Success of reimplantation was determined using Delphi criteria.

RESULTS

Out of 5 I&D patients, 40% had to be reoperated because of persistent infection. Out of 6 explanted patients who were reimplanted, 67% failed. According to McPherson, 40% of I&D and 22.2% of explanted patients were significantly compromised hosts.

CONCLUSION

C. striatum PJI has a high-treatment failure rate in patient undergoing I&D or 2-stage revision surgery. Surgeons should be aware of the difficulty controlling this PJI and advise patients accordingly.

Intra-wound vancomycin powder for the eradication of periprosthetic joint infection after debridement and implant exchange: experimental study in a rat model

Background

Intra-wound vancomycin powder (VP) has been used in clinical practice to prevent periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after primary knee/hip arthroplasty. The role of intra-wound VP in the setting of debridement and implant exchange after PJI remains undefined. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of intra-wound VP in the control of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infection after debridement and implant exchange.

Methods

PJI modeling by knee prosthesis implantation and MRSA inoculation, debridement and implant exchange were performed in Wistar rats successively to mimic the one-stage exchange arthroplasty of PJI patients. Two weeks of systemic vancomycin (SV) or/and intraoperative intra-wound VP of single dosage were applied after revision surgery.

Results

No post-surgery deaths, incision complications and signs of drug toxicity were observed. The microbial counts of SV or intra-wound VP group were significantly reduced compared with the control group, while bacteria were still detected on the bone, soft-tissue and prosthesis. The elimination of bacterial counts, along with improvement of tissue inflammation and serum inflammatory markers, were observed in the rats with SV plus intra-wound VP. Serum levels of vancomycin in all groups were lower than that of causing nephrotoxicity, while no statistic difference was observed in the serum biochemical marker among the groups.

Conclusions

Intra-wound VP is effective after debridement and implant exchange in our current rat PJI model. Neither SV nor intra-wound VP alone could eradicate the bacteria within a two-weeks treatment course, while SV plus intra-wound VP could eliminate the MRSA infection, without notable hepatic or renal toxicity and any incision complications.

Local Application of Vancomycin in One-Stage Revision of Prosthetic Joint Infection Caused by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

The rate of eradication of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is still not satisfactory with systemic vancomycin administration after one-stage revision arthroplasty. This study aimed to explore the effectiveness and safety of intraarticular (IA) injection of vancomycin in the control of MRSA PJI after one-stage revision surgery in a rat model. Two weeks of intraperitoneal (IP) and/or IA injection of vancomycin was used to control the infection after one-stage revision surgery. The MRSA PJI rats treated with IA injection of vancomycin showed better outcomes in skin temperature, bacterial counts, biofilm on the prosthesis, serum α₁-acid glycoprotein levels, residual bone volume, and inflammatory reaction in the joint tissue, compared with those treated with IP vancomycin, while the rats treated with IP and IA administration showed the best outcomes. However, only the IP and IA administration of vancomycin could eradicate MRSA. Minimal changes in renal pathology were observed in the IP and IP plus IA groups but not in the IA group, while no obvious changes were observed in the liver or in levels of serum markers, including creatinine, alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate aminotransferase. Therefore, IA use of vancomycin is effective and safe in the MRSA PJI rat model and is better than systemic administration, while IA and systemic vancomycin treatment could eradicate the infection with a 2-week treatment course.