Parabrachial nucleus lesions block taste and attenuate flavor preference and aversion conditioning in rats

Rats with ibotenic acid lesions of the parabrachial nucleus (PBN) failed to learn a taste aversion induced by lithium chloride (LiCl) toxicosis. The same rats also did not learn to prefer a taste that was paired with intragastric (IG) carbohydrate infusions during 22 hr/day trials. The PBN-lesioned rats did learn to prefer a flavor (odor + taste) paired with the IG carbohydrate infusions over a different flavor paired with IG water. The PBN-lesioned rats also learned to avoid a flavor paired with IG LiCl infusions during 22 hr/day trials. The flavor preference and aversion, however, were less pronounced than those displayed by control rats. These data indicate that the PBN is essential for forming orosensory-viscerosensory associations when taste is the primary cue but is less critical when more complex flavor cues are available.

D1 but not D2 dopamine receptor antagonism blocks the acquisition of a flavor preference conditioned by intragastric carbohydrate infusions

The effects of dopamine D1 (SCH23390) and D2 (raclopride) receptor antagonists on the acquisition and expressions of flavor preferences conditioned by the postingestive actions of sucrose were investigated. Food-restricted rats were trained in one-bottle sessions to associate one flavored saccharin solution (CS+) with intragastric (i.g.) infusions of 16% sucrose, and another flavored saccharin solution (CS-) with water infusions. Flavor preferences were then measured in two-bottle tests. In Experiment 1A, rats that received the D2 antagonist (raclopride, 200 nmol/kg; RAC group) throughout training consumed less CS+ and CS- than did saline-treated Control rats; a saline-treated Yoked group had its intake limited to that of the RAC group. All three groups displayed CS+ preferences during two-bottle tests when treated with saline or raclopride, except at doses that greatly suppressed intake. Experiment 1B obtained similar results with rats treated with 400 nmol/kg raclopride throughout training. In Experiment 2, rats that received the D1 antagonist (SCH23390, 200 nmol/kg; SCH group) throughout training consumed less CS+ and CS- than did saline-treated Control rats; a saline-treated Yoked group had its intake limited to that of the SCH group. Unlike the Control and Yoked groups, the SCH group failed to prefer the CS+ to the CS- in two bottle tests. SCH23390 treatment during two-bottle testing did not block CS+ preference in the Control or Yoked groups, except at doses that greatly suppressed intake. We conclude that D1, but not D2, dopamine receptors are critically involved in the acquisition of a sucrose-conditioned flavor preference, and both receptor subtypes have a more limited role in the expression of this preference.

Naltrexone fails to block the acquisition or expression of a flavor preference conditioned by intragastric carbohydrate infusions

The effects of naltrexone on the expression and acquisition of flavor preferences conditioned by the postingestive actions of carbohydrates were investigated. Food-restricted rats (Experiment 1) were given one-bottle training with one flavored saccharin solution (CS+) paired with intragastric (IG) infusions of 16% sucrose, and another flavored saccharin solution (CS-) paired with water infusions. In two-bottle tests CS+ was preferred to CS-, and naltrexone (1.0-5.0 mg/kg) reduced total intake but not CS+ preference. In Experiment 2 food-restricted rats that received naltrexone (0.1 or 1.0 mg/kg; NTX group) throughout one-bottle training consumed less CS+ and CS- than did saline-treated control rats. Yet, the NTX and control groups displayed similar CS+ preferences during two-bottle tests when treated with saline or naltrexone (0.1-5.0 mg/kg). In Experiment 3, rats were trained to accept more CS+ than CS- in one-bottle tests. Naltrexone (0.1-2.5 mg/kg) reduced the one-bottle intakes of both solutions, and the rats continued to consume more CS+ than CS-. We conclude that the opioid system modulates the consumption of flavored solutions, but is not critically involved in the acquisition or expression of flavor preferences conditioned by IG carbohydrate.

Conditioned flavor avoidance, preference, and indifference produced by intragastric infusions of galactose, glucose, and fructose in rats

The postingestive reinforcing and satiating effects of intragastric (i.g.) infusions of 16% galactose, glucose, and fructose were compared in adult female rats. In Experiment 1, food-restricted rats were trained to drink (30 min/day) flavored solutions (the CS+Gal and CS+Glu) paired with intragastric (i.g.) infusions of galactose and glucose; other flavors (the CS-) were paired with IG water infusions. In subsequent choice tests, the rats strongly preferred (91%) the CS+Glu to the CS-, but avoided the CS+Gal (21%) in favor of the CS-. In Experiment 2, the rats were trained with a CS+Fru paired with i.g. fructose infusions and a CS- paired with i.g. water. In the choice test they consumed similar amounts of CS+Fru and CS- (CS+Fru preference = 51%). In other choice tests they preferred the CS+Glu (>80%) to CS+Fru and CS+Gal, and the CS+Fru (81%) to CS+Gal. Satiation tests were performed in Experiment 3 by adapting the rats to drink a 3% sugar + 0.2% saccharin solution paired with i.g. water infusions (30 min/day). On different test days 16% sugar instead of water was infused. IG galactose, glucose, and fructose produced comparable reductions in sugar+saccharin intake in the first test session. These findings demonstrate that, while the three sugars had similar satiating effects, they differed substantially in their postingestive flavor conditioning effects. The glucose and fructose results confirm prior data indicating that only glucose generates potent postingestive reinforcing stimuli. The galactose-induced flavor avoidance indicates that this sugar has a negative postingestive consequence. This may be due to the slow and incomplete hepatic metabolism of this sugar in adult rats. Conceivably, galactose intolerance may contribute to the lactose avoidance in adult animals.

Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric sugar infusions in rats: maltose is more reinforcing than sucrose

Prior research indicates that glucose conditions much stronger flavor preferences in rats than does fructose. This could occur because intestinal absorption of fructose is much slower than that of glucose and because fructose malabsorption may have aversive consequences. Fructose absorption is facilitated when glucose is also present in the gut. The present study therefore compared the flavor conditioning effects of maltose (a glucose + glucose disaccharide) to those of sucrose (a glucose + fructose disaccharide). In Experiment 1, rats had different flavors paired with intragastric infusions of 32% maltose (CS+M), 32% sucrose (CS+S), and water (CS-) 23 h/day. In subsequent two-bottle tests, both CS+ solutions were strongly preferred to the CS-, but the CS+M was also preferred (78%) to the CS+S. Experiment 2A revealed that the rats also learned to prefer a CS+M to a CS+S when 16% sugar infusions were used. In Experiment 2B, the same rats preferred a flavor paired with 16% maltose to a flavor paired with 8% maltose. They did not reliably prefer a flavor paired with 16% sucrose to a flavor paired with 8% maltose. These results demonstrate that the postingestive actions of maltose are more reinforcing than those of sucrose. This indicates that fructose is less reinforcing than glucose even when malabsorption is not a factor. In contrast to their preference for the CS+M over the CS+S, the rats preferred sucrose to maltose when drinking the sugars by mouth. Therefore, sugar preferences mediated by oral taste receptors differ from those conditioned by postoral nutrient detectors.

Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric polycose in rats: more concentrated polycose is not always more reinforcing

Prior studies have obtained conditioned preferences for flavors paired with intragastric (IG) infusions of Polycose (hydrolyzed starch) at concentrations of 1-32% over a different flavor paired with IG water. The present study determined if rats would also learn to prefer a flavor paired with concentrated Polycose infusion over a flavor paired with a more dilute Polycose infusion. In Experiment 1, adult female rats were food-deprived and trained during alternating one-bottle sessions (30 min/day) to associate one flavored solution (the CS + 8) with IG infusions of 8% Polycose, a second flavored solution (the CS + 16) with IG infusions of 16% Polycose, and a third flavored solution (the CS-) with IG water infusions. In subsequent choice tests, the rats displayed similar preferences for the CS + 8 and CS + 16 over the CS-, but preferred the CS + 16 to CS + 8 in a direct choice test. A similar preference pattern was obtained in 22 h/day tests with the rats nondeprived. In Experiment 2, new rats were similarly trained and tested but with CS + 16 and CS + 32 solutions paired with 16% and 32% Polycose infusions, respectively. The rats preferred both CS+ solutions over the CS- solution in the short- and long-term tests. However, the CS + 16 was preferred over the CS + 32 by the food-deprived rats in the short-term tests. The two CS+ solutions were equally preferred in the long-term tests with food ad lib. These and other findings indicate that the postingestive reinforcing action of Polycose increases as concentration increases from 1% to 16% but does not increase further, and may actually decrease, at a 32% concentration. The rapid satiating effect of concentrated carbohydrate solutions may limit their reinforcing consequences.