1
|
Namgial T, Singh AK, Singh NP, Francis A, Chattopadhyay D, Voloudakis A, Chakraborty S. Correction to: Differential expression of genes during recovery of Nicotiana tabacum from tomato leaf curl Gujarat virus infection. Planta 2023; 258:51. [PMID: 37490148 PMCID: PMC10368538 DOI: 10.1007/s00425-023-04206-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- T Namgial
- Laboratory of Plant Breeding and Biometry, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, Athens, 11855, Greece
- Molecular Virology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, 110067, India
| | - A K Singh
- Molecular Virology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, 110067, India
| | - N P Singh
- Laboratory of Plant Molecular Biology, National Institute of Plant Genome Research, New Delhi, 110067, India
| | - A Francis
- Laboratory of Plant Molecular Biology, National Institute of Plant Genome Research, New Delhi, 110067, India
| | - D Chattopadhyay
- Laboratory of Plant Molecular Biology, National Institute of Plant Genome Research, New Delhi, 110067, India
| | - A Voloudakis
- Laboratory of Plant Breeding and Biometry, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, Athens, 11855, Greece.
| | - S Chakraborty
- Molecular Virology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, 110067, India.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Namgial T, Singh AK, Singh NP, Francis A, Chattopadhyay D, Voloudakis A, Chakraborty S. Differential expression of genes during recovery of Nicotiana tabacum from tomato leaf curl Gujarat virus infection. Planta 2023; 258:37. [PMID: 37405593 PMCID: PMC10322791 DOI: 10.1007/s00425-023-04182-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023]
Abstract
MAIN CONCLUSION Nicotiana tabacum exhibits recovery response towards tomato leaf curl Gujarat virus. Transcriptome analysis revealed the differential expression of defense-related genes. Genes encoding for cysteine protease inhibitor, hormonal- and stress-related to DNA repair mechanism are found to be involved in the recovery process. Elucidating the role of host factors in response to viral infection is crucial in understanding the plant host-virus interaction. Begomovirus, a genus in the family Geminiviridae, is reported throughout the globe and is known to cause serious crop diseases. Tomato leaf curl Gujarat virus (ToLCGV) infection in Nicotiana tabacum resulted in initial symptom expression followed by a quick recovery in the systemic leaves. Transcriptome analysis using next-generation sequencing (NGS) revealed a large number of differentially expressed genes both in symptomatic as well as recovered leaves when compared to mock-inoculated plants. The virus infected N. tabacum results in alteration of various metabolic pathways, phytohormone signaling pathway, defense related protein, protease inhibitor, and DNA repair pathway. RT-qPCR results indicated that Germin-like protein subfamily T member 2 (NtGLPST), Cysteine protease inhibitor 1-like (NtCPI), Thaumatin-like protein (NtTLP), Kirola-like (NtKL), and Ethylene-responsive transcription factor ERF109-like (NtERTFL) were down-regulated in symptomatic leaves when compared to recovered leaves of ToLCGV-infected plants. In contrast, the Auxin-responsive protein SAUR71-like (NtARPSL) was found to be differentially down-regulated in recovered leaves when compared to symptomatic leaves and the mock-inoculated plants. Lastly, Histone 2X protein like (NtHH2L) gene was found to be down-regulated, whereas Uncharacterized (NtUNCD) was up-regulated in both symptomatic as well as recovered leaves compared to the mock-inoculated plants. Taken together, the present study suggests potential roles of the differentially expressed genes that might govern tobacco's susceptibility and/or recovery response towards ToLCGV infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Namgial
- Laboratory of Plant Breeding and Biometry, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, Athens, 11855, Greece
- Molecular Virology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, 110067, India
| | - A K Singh
- Molecular Virology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, 110067, India
| | - N P Singh
- Laboratory of Plant Molecular Biology, National Institute of Plant Genome Research, New Delhi, 110067, India
| | - A Francis
- Laboratory of Plant Molecular Biology, National Institute of Plant Genome Research, New Delhi, 110067, India
| | - D Chattopadhyay
- Laboratory of Plant Molecular Biology, National Institute of Plant Genome Research, New Delhi, 110067, India
| | - A Voloudakis
- Laboratory of Plant Breeding and Biometry, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, Athens, 11855, Greece.
| | - S Chakraborty
- Molecular Virology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, 110067, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wong M, Nakhoul G, Calice-Silva V, Tannor E, Kumar V, Abdul Hafidz M, Chanchlani R, Chen T, Ekrikpo U, Francis A, Kalyesubula R, Karam S, Pereira-Kamath N, Wijewickrama E, Jha V. WCN23-0776 BARRIERS TO ACCESSING ESSENTIAL MEDICINES IN NEPHROLOGY AND RELATED NON-COMMUNICABLE DISEASES: A SCOPING REVIEW. Kidney Int Rep 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.02.539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2023] Open
|
4
|
Williams JAE, Chester-Jones M, Francis A, Marian I, Goff M, Brewer G, Gulati M, Eldridge L, Julier P, Minns Lowe C, Barber V, Glover V, Mackworth-Young C, Vincent T, Lamb SE, Vincent K, Dutton SJ, Watt FE. AB0980 Hand Osteoarthritis: investigating Pain Effects in a randomised placebo-controlled feasibility study of estrogen-containing therapy (HOPE-e): report on the primary feasibility outcomes. Ann Rheum Dis 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.2437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundThere is an unmet need for new treatments for hand osteoarthritis (OA). Symptomatic hand OA is more common in women and its incidence increases round the age of menopause. Pre-clinical, epidemiological and post hoc studies in Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) trials implicate estrogen deficiency as of likely importance in OA aetiopathogenesis. No clinical trials of HRT have been carried out in hand OA to date. The licensed HRT Duavive (conjugated estrogens + SERM bazedoxifene) was selected on its potential for efficacy and tolerability.ObjectivesWe set out to determine the feasibility and acceptability of this form of HRT in post-menopausal women with hand OA, to generate proof of concept data and refine methods for a full study.MethodsISRCTN12196200. Females aged 40-65 yrs and 1-10yrs after final menstrual period with hand OA fulfilling ACR criteria and 2+ painful hand joints were recruited. Eligibility incorporated best practice for HRT prescription but did not require menopausal symptoms. Recruitment was at 3 sites in primary/secondary care, including directly from the community. Design was parallel group, double-blind 1:1 randomisation of Duavive or placebo, orally once daily for 24 weeks, then weaning for 4 weeks before stopping. Routes and rates of recruitment and the acceptability of randomisation, medication (compliance, retention), and proposed outcomes were measured, and the likelihood of unblinding. Measures related to hand pain and function, menopause symptoms and joint appearance. Patient and Public Involvement actively informed study rationale, design and materials. An end of study questionnaire and 2 participant focus groups provided further acceptability data.ResultsRecruitment was for 12/possible 18 months, interrupted due to COVID-19. Some study procedures were modified to allow reopening whilst collecting all primary outcomes. 434 enquiries/referrals were received, leading to 96 telephone pre-screens, of which 33 gave written informed consent and attended face to face screening. 28/33 screened (85%) were eligible and randomised. The highest number of randomisations was from study web presence (n=7) followed by SMS text from GP surgeries (n=5). Of 401 not proceeding, 250 (62%) were ineligible, most commonly due to contraindicated medication, followed by medical contraindication, whilst 55 (14%) decided not to take part, for reasons including not wanting to take a hormone-based drug or difficulty attending study visits. Retention and compliance were excellent. All 28 participants completed all study follow ups, with only 3 withdrawals from treatment due to AEs, 2 of these at week 24 and all in the placebo arm. There were no serious AEs. High levels of completeness of all study outcome measures were achieved. Bang’s blinding index suggested that participants/investigators were well blinded. There were overall high/good levels of satisfaction with taking part in the study. 26/28 (92%) would recommend taking part to others with hand OA (irrespective of study arm). Many found the flexibility offered by a combination of remote and face to face visits (due to the pandemic) attractive. Additional insights from focus groups were to include hand stiffness as well as pain measures but to reduce the overall number of questions.ConclusionDespite COVID-19 and a reduced recruitment period, this study recruited sufficient numbers to assess feasibility outcomes. Randomisation of eligible people and retention rates were high. A mixture of remote and face to face visits due to COVID-19 probably improved recruitment and retention and was supported by participants, who were generally satisfied with the study design and medication. The study provided useful insight and improvements that would be incorporated into a future study. Overall, this feasibility study showed that with clear messaging on eligibility and a defined recruitment strategy, recruitment and retention to a study testing this treatment is possible.AcknowledgementsThis research was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Programme (Grant Reference Number PB-PG-0416-20023). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. The study team thank the sites and the participants who made this research possible.Disclosure of InterestsJennifer A.E. Williams: None declared, Mae Chester-Jones: None declared, Anne Francis: None declared, Ioana Marian: None declared, Megan Goff: None declared, Gretchen Brewer: None declared, Malvika Gulati: None declared, Lucy Eldridge: None declared, Patrick Julier: None declared, Catherine Minns Lowe: None declared, Vicki Barber: None declared, Victoria Glover: None declared, Charles Mackworth-Young: None declared, Tonia Vincent Consultant of: Pfizer, Grant/research support from: Grant support from Fidia, Biosplice, Novartis, Pfizer as part of their contribution to an international consortium., Sarah E Lamb: None declared, Katy Vincent: None declared, Susan J Dutton: None declared, Fiona E Watt Consultant of: Pfizer, Grant/research support from: Pfizer and from Astellas Pharma (> 3 years ago)
Collapse
|
5
|
LALJI R, Francis A, Blazek K, Teixeira-Pinto A, Wong G, Johnson D. POS-777 SEX DIFFERENCES IN ACCESS TO AND OUTCOMES AFTER PAEDIATRIC KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION. Kidney Int Rep 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.01.813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
6
|
Molodyk A, Samoilenkov S, Markelov A, Degtyarenko P, Lee S, Petrykin V, Gaifullin M, Mankevich A, Vavilov A, Sorbom B, Cheng J, Garberg S, Kesler L, Hartwig Z, Gavrilkin S, Tsvetkov A, Okada T, Awaji S, Abraimov D, Francis A, Bradford G, Larbalestier D, Senatore C, Bonura M, Pantoja AE, Wimbush SC, Strickland NM, Vasiliev A. Development and large volume production of extremely high current density YBa 2Cu 3O 7 superconducting wires for fusion. Sci Rep 2021; 11:2084. [PMID: 33483553 PMCID: PMC7822827 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81559-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The fusion power density produced in a tokamak is proportional to its magnetic field strength to the fourth power. Second-generation high temperature superconductor (2G HTS) wires demonstrate remarkable engineering current density (averaged over the full wire), JE, at very high magnetic fields, driving progress in fusion and other applications. The key challenge for HTS wires has been to offer an acceptable combination of high and consistent superconducting performance in high magnetic fields, high volume supply, and low price. Here we report a very high and reproducible JE in practical HTS wires based on a simple YBa2Cu3O7 (YBCO) superconductor formulation with Y2O3 nanoparticles, which have been delivered in just nine months to a commercial fusion customer in the largest-volume order the HTS industry has seen to date. We demonstrate a novel YBCO superconductor formulation without the c-axis correlated nano-columnar defects that are widely believed to be prerequisite for high in-field performance. The simplicity of this new formulation allows robust and scalable manufacturing, providing, for the first time, large volumes of consistently high performance wire, and the economies of scale necessary to lower HTS wire prices to a level acceptable for fusion and ultimately for the widespread commercial adoption of HTS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Molodyk
- S-Innovations, Moscow, Russia.
- SuperOx, Moscow, Russia.
| | - S Samoilenkov
- S-Innovations, Moscow, Russia
- SuperOx, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - P Degtyarenko
- SuperOx, Moscow, Russia
- Joint Institute for High Temperature, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - S Lee
- SuperOx Japan, Kanagawa, Japan
| | | | | | | | - A Vavilov
- S-Innovations, Moscow, Russia
- SuperOx, Moscow, Russia
- SuperOx Japan, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - B Sorbom
- Commonwealth Fusion Systems, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - J Cheng
- Commonwealth Fusion Systems, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - S Garberg
- Commonwealth Fusion Systems, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - L Kesler
- Commonwealth Fusion Systems, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Z Hartwig
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - S Gavrilkin
- P.N. Lebedev Physics Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - A Tsvetkov
- P.N. Lebedev Physics Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - T Okada
- Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
| | - S Awaji
- Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
| | - D Abraimov
- National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
| | - A Francis
- National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
| | - G Bradford
- National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
| | - D Larbalestier
- National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
| | - C Senatore
- University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - M Bonura
- University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - A E Pantoja
- Robinson Research Institute, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - S C Wimbush
- Robinson Research Institute, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - N M Strickland
- Robinson Research Institute, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - A Vasiliev
- National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute", Moscow, Russia
- Shubnikov Institute of Crystallography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
- Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Francis A. Biological evaluation of preceramic organosilicon polymers for various healthcare and biomedical engineering applications: A review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2020; 109:744-764. [PMID: 33075186 DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.34740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Revised: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Preceramic organosilicon materials combining the properties of a polymer and an inorganic ceramic phase are of great interest to scientists working in biomedical sciences. The interdisciplinary nature of organosilicon polymers and their molecular structures, as well as their diversity of applications have resulted in an unprecedented range of devices and synergies cutting across unrelated fields in medicine and engineering. Organosilicon materials, especially the polysiloxanes, have a long history of industrial and medical uses in many versatile aspects as they can be easily fabricated into complex-shaped products using a wide variety of computer-aided or polymer manufacturing techniques. Thus far, intensive research activities have been mainly devoted to the processing of preceramic organosilicon polymers toward magnetic, electronic, structural, optical, and not biological applications. Herein we present innovative research studies and recent developments of preceramic organosilicon polymers at the interface with biological systems, displaying the versatility and multi-functionality of these materials. This article reviews recent research on preceramic organosilicon polymers and corresponding composites for bone tissue regeneration and medical engineering implants, focusing on three particular topics: (a) surface modifications to create tailorable and bioactive surfaces with high corrosion resistance and improved biological properties; (b) biological evaluations for specific applications, such as in glaucoma drainage devices, orthopedic implants, bone tissue regeneration, wound dressing, drug delivery systems, and antibacterial activity; and (c) in vitro and in vivo studies for cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, and cell viability. The interest in organosilicon materials stems from the fact that a vast array of these materials have complementary attributes that, when integrated appropriately with functional fillers and carefully controlled conditions, could be exploited either as polymeric Si-based composites or as organosilicon polymer-derived Si-based ceramic composites to tailor and optimize properties of the Si-based materials for various proposed applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adel Francis
- Department of Advanced Materials, Central Metallurgical R & D Institute (CMRDI), Helwan, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gardosi J, Turner S, Williams M, Buller S, Hugh O, Francis A. The Growth Assessment Protocol: a major cause of declining stillbirth rates in the UK. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 56:117-119. [PMID: 32506617 DOI: 10.1002/uog.22100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - S Turner
- Perinatal Institute, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - S Buller
- Perinatal Institute, Birmingham, UK
| | - O Hugh
- Perinatal Institute, Birmingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nasri K, Hantoushzadeh S, Hugh O, Heidarzadeh M, Habibelahi A, Shariat M, Tara F, Kashanian M, Radmehr M, Yekaninejad MS, Homeira VC, Francis A, Gardosi J. Customized birthweight standard for an Iranian population. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2019; 34:3651-3656. [PMID: 31766924 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1689557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To produce a customized birthweight standard for Iran.Method: Retrospective study of a pregnancy database collected from five hospitals across Iran. The cohort consisted of 4994 consecutive term births with complete data, delivered between July 2013 and November 2014. Coefficients were derived using a backwards stepwise multiple regression technique.Results: Maternal height, weight in early pregnancy and parity as well as the baby's sex were identified as significant physiological variables affecting birthweight. Paternal height and weight were also significant although weaker factors. The expected 280-day birthweight, free from pathological influences, of a standard size mother (height 163 cm, weight 64 kg) in her first pregnancy was 3390 g. Pathological factors found to affect birthweight in this cohort included village housing, anemia, preexisting and gestational diabetes and preeclampsia.Conclusion: The analysis confirmed the main physiological variables that affect birthweight in other countries and shows paternal factors also to be significant variables. Development of a country-specific customized birthweight standard will aid clinicians in Iran to distinguish between fetuses that are either constitutionally or pathologically small, thereby avoiding unnecessary interventions, and improving identification of at-risk pregnancies and perinatal outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Nasri
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
| | - S Hantoushzadeh
- Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal and Breast-Feeding Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - O Hugh
- Perinatal Institute, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | - M Shariat
- Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal and Breast-Feeding Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - F Tara
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - M Kashanian
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Akbar Abadi Teaching Hospital, Tehran, Iran
| | - M Radmehr
- Clinical Research Center, Milad General Hospital, Tehran, Iran
| | - M S Yekaninejad
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - V C Homeira
- Maternal-Fetal Medicine Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Parker CN, Francis A, Finlayson KJ. Methods for chronic wound research — A scoping systematic review of the recommendations, guidelines and standards. WPR 2019. [DOI: 10.33235/wpr.27.2.62-73] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Background This scoping systematic review aimed to investigate the existing literature for recommendations, guidelines and standards for research on chronic wound diagnosis, assessment, management and prevention; to identify gaps in this literature; and produce recommendations to support future wound management research.
Methods A scoping systematic literature review was undertaken in 2017–2018, which aligned with PRISMA guidelines and searched academic databases and grey literature published between 2007 and 2017.
Results Eighty-nine documents included recommendations or outcomes on research methods for studies on chronic wound diagnosis, assessment, management and/or prevention; covering the areas of research design, sampling, randomisation and blinding, independent and outcome measures and interventions for research in chronic wounds. Common themes regarding research gaps and flaws were identified.
Conclusion This review identified existing evidence, guidelines, recommendations and standards regarding the conduct of chronic wound research internationally. Recommendations include the need for standardised vocabulary, standardised checklists for wound research, development of core outcome datasets and an agreed and standardised set of economic parameters and methodology for cost-effectiveness. Establishment of a centralised national methodology service for wound research to assist with methodology design would be beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- CN Parker
- Faculty of Health, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation Queensland University of Technology Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia
| | - A Francis
- Faculty of Health, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation Queensland University of Technology Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia Faculty of Medicine The University of Queensland Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - KJ Finlayson
- Faculty of Health, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation Queensland University of Technology Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Affiliation(s)
- A Francis
- 1 Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University, New York, USA
| | - J Nusbaum
- 2 Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, New York University, New York, USA
| | | | - T Spruill
- 4 Population Health, Medicine, New York University, New York, USA
| | - J Buyon
- 2 Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, New York University, New York, USA
| | - S Mehta-Lee
- 5 Maternal-Fetal Medicine, New York University, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kshrisagar S, Francis A, J. Yee J, Natarajan S, K. Lee C. Implementing the Node Based Smoothed Finite Element Method as User Element in Abaqus for Linear and Nonlinear Elasticity. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019. [DOI: 10.32604/cmc.2019.07967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
13
|
Francis A, Huber KT, Moulton V. Correction to: Tree-Based Unrooted Phylogenetic Networks. Bull Math Biol 2018; 81:936-937. [PMID: 30446916 DOI: 10.1007/s11538-018-0530-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2018] [Accepted: 10/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
The level-5 example of a network presented in Fig. 4 of Francis et al. (2018) is tree-based even though it states in the caption and in the text that this is not the case.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Francis
- Centre for Research in Mathematics, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
| | - K T Huber
- School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
| | - V Moulton
- School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fucci E, Abdoun O, Caclin A, Francis A, Dunne JD, Ricard M, Davidson RJ, Lutz A. Differential effects of non-dual and focused attention meditations on the formation of automatic perceptual habits in expert practitioners. Neuropsychologia 2018; 119:92-100. [PMID: 30040956 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.07.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2018] [Revised: 07/15/2018] [Accepted: 07/20/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Non-dual meditation aims to undo maladaptive cognitive and affective patterns by recognizing their constructed and transient nature. We previously found high-amplitude spontaneous gamma (25-40 Hz) oscillatory activity during such practice. Nonetheless, it is unclear how this meditation state differs from other practices, in terms of perceptual information processing. Here, we hypothesized that non-dual meditation can downregulate the automatic formation of perceptual habits. To investigate this hypothesis, we recorded EEG from expert Buddhist meditation practitioners and matched novices to measure two components of the auditory evoked response: the Mismatch Negativity (MMN) and the Late Frontal Negativity (LFN), a potential observed at a latency sensitive to attentional engagement to the auditory environment, during the practices of Open Presence (OP) and Focused Attention (FA), as well as during a control state, in the context of a passive oddball paradigm. We found an increase in gamma oscillatory power during both meditation states in expert practitioners and an interaction between states and groups in the amplitude of the MMN. A further investigation identified the specific interplay between the MMN and the LFN as a possible marker to differentiate the two meditation states as a function of expertise. In experts, the MMN increased during FA, compared to OP, while the opposite pattern was observed at the LFN latency. We propose that the state of OP in experts is characterized by increased sensory monitoring and reduced perceptual inferences compared to FA. This study represents a first attempt to describe the impact of non-dual meditation states on the regulation of automatic brain predictive processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Fucci
- Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
| | - O Abdoun
- Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
| | - A Caclin
- Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
| | - A Francis
- Center for Healthy Minds, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - J D Dunne
- Center for Healthy Minds, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - M Ricard
- Shechen Tennyi Dargyeling Monastery, Nepal
| | - R J Davidson
- University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA; Center for Healthy Minds, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - A Lutz
- Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France; University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
In recent years public awareness of healthcare disparities experienced by transgender individuals throughout the world have garnered increasing attention within the media and from health advocates. Despite this increasing awareness, a paucity of research data and clinical protocols of care for clinicians continues to exist, especially in regard to the transgender individual’s family planning needs. Clinicians should be on the forefront of promoting strategies that forge a meaningful and collaborative relationship with the transgender man, including as he transitions through to the menopause and his sexual and reproductive healthcare needs. Unfortunately, despite best efforts to address the health concerns of transgender men in midlife, including their contraceptive needs and pregnancy desires, there is currently a paucity of research. Although hormonal contraceptives are not an option for this group of individuals, especially those on masculinizing hormones, IUD’s, both copper containing and progestin containing, should be considered for those with intact pelvic organs. For this group of transgender men with potential for pregnancy who have either completed their family or choose not to give birth, sterilization can be offered. Regardless of where they identify along the gender spectrum, these midlife individuals with potential reproductive potential should have equitable access to and up to date counseling on their contraceptive options. This commentary addresses the contraceptive challenges of the midlife transgender man. (Note: Pronouns used in this article are he/him for cis and transgender men and she/her for cis and transgender women).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Francis
- Clinical Instructor and Academic Faculty Scholar, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 125 Paterson St, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
| | - S Jasani
- Clinical Instructor and Academic Faculty Scholar, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 125 Paterson St, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
| | - G Bachmann
- Clinical Instructor and Academic Faculty Scholar, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 125 Paterson St, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Della Morte M, Francis A, Gérardin A, Gülpers V, Herdoíza G, von Hippel G, Horch H, Jäger B, Meyer H, Nyffeler A, Wittig H. A lattice calculation of the hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to (g – 2)µ. EPJ Web Conf 2018. [DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201817506031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
We present results of calculations of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment. Specifically, we focus on controlling the infrared regime of the vacuum polarisation function. Our results are corrected for finite-size effects by combining the Gounaris-Sakurai parameterisation of the timelike pion form factor with the Lüscher formalism. The impact of quark-disconnected diagrams and the precision of the scale determination is discussed and included in our final result in two-flavour QCD, which carries an overall uncertainty of 6%. We present preliminary results computed on ensembles with Nf = 2 + 1 dynamical flavours and discuss how the long-distance contribution can be accurately constrained by a dedicated spectrum calculation in the iso-vector channel.
Collapse
|
17
|
Fallowfield LJ, Matthews L, Jenkins VA, May SF, Francis A, Rae D, Wallis M. Abstract OT3-08-01: Interview data from women contemplating LORIS trial entry during the feasibility study. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-ot3-08-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: LORIS is a multi-centre, randomised (1:1) controlled trial of Surgery v Active Monitoring with annual mammography in patients with low risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). During a 2 year Feasibility Study potential patients were invited to complete the Clinical Trials Questionnaire (CTQ)1 and participate in a semi structured telephone interview about the verbal, written and DVD based trial information. The DVD was produced to complement the patient information sheet (PIS) and incorporates simple graphics and a Q&A session with women asking the Chief Investigator questions about the trial.
Aims:To examine the reasons for trial participation/rejection and obtain feedback about the clarity, timing and usefulness of the PIS and DVD in order to identify potential communication drivers and barriers to trial recruitment.
Methods: Participants completed the CTQ1 prior to randomisation and with their consent were contacted following randomisation for an interview. Women declining the trial were issued with an optional pack containing the CTQ1 and the researchers' contact details if they wanted an interview. The CTQ1 comprises16 reasons that might influence a decision to either accept or decline a trial. For each statement participants register their agreement or disagreement on a scale of 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree) and indicate the most important reason for their decision. Interviews explored factors such as, attitudes about randomisation, and usefulness of the trial information provided.
Results: 41 patients were randomised during feasibility; 20 surgery, 21 active monitoring, 16 patients declined the trial. 40/41(98%) acceptors and 9/16 (56%) decliners completed the CTQ1. The main reason for joining LORIS was:- “I thought the trial offered the best treatment available” 13/40 (32%) and for decling the trial was “The idea of randomisation worried me” (4/9; 44%).
35 interviews were conducted (31/41 (76%) accepted and 4/16 (25%) declined LORIS). At interview acceptors commented that the PIS was very useful and clear (84%; 26/31 & 90%; 28/31, respectively). 74% (23/31) of women who joined LORIS watched the DVD and the majority (19/23; 83%) found it “very useful” and 22 (22/23; 96%) “very easy to understand”. A third of women (10/31) said the PIS and the DVD helped them decide to participate in LORIS. Women who declined the trial had clear treatment preferences; 2/4 did not watch the DVD. Three quarters of women interviewed (19/25) watched the DVD with family members/friends and found it reassuring. One commented it was “Put in words you can understand and not be baffled by”. The most popular aspect was the Q&A session (13/25; 52%).
Conclusions:The LORIS DVD was a useful, easy to understand recruitment tool, complementing the PIS. Many women felt reassured that the content was consistent with, and added to that provided by healthcare professionals. Opinions of family and friends, worries about randomisation and personal preferences exert an influence of those declining these types of trial.
Fallowfield LJ, Jenkins V, et al. (1998) Attitudes of patients to randomised clinical trials of cancer therapy. Eur J Cancer 34(10):1554–1559.
Citation Format: Fallowfield LJ, Matthews L, Jenkins VA, May SF, Francis A, Rae D, Wallis M. Interview data from women contemplating LORIS trial entry during the feasibility study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-08-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- LJ Fallowfield
- SHORE-C, BSMS, University of Sussex, Brighton, East Sussex, United Kingdom; Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Addenbrook's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - L Matthews
- SHORE-C, BSMS, University of Sussex, Brighton, East Sussex, United Kingdom; Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Addenbrook's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - VA Jenkins
- SHORE-C, BSMS, University of Sussex, Brighton, East Sussex, United Kingdom; Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Addenbrook's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - SF May
- SHORE-C, BSMS, University of Sussex, Brighton, East Sussex, United Kingdom; Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Addenbrook's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - A Francis
- SHORE-C, BSMS, University of Sussex, Brighton, East Sussex, United Kingdom; Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Addenbrook's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - D Rae
- SHORE-C, BSMS, University of Sussex, Brighton, East Sussex, United Kingdom; Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Addenbrook's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - M Wallis
- SHORE-C, BSMS, University of Sussex, Brighton, East Sussex, United Kingdom; Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Addenbrook's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Phylogenetic networks are a generalization of phylogenetic trees that are used to represent non-tree-like evolutionary histories that arise in organisms such as plants and bacteria, or uncertainty in evolutionary histories. An unrooted phylogenetic network on a non-empty, finite set X of taxa, or network, is a connected, simple graph in which every vertex has degree 1 or 3 and whose leaf set is X. It is called a phylogenetic tree if the underlying graph is a tree. In this paper we consider properties of tree-based networks, that is, networks that can be constructed by adding edges into a phylogenetic tree. We show that although they have some properties in common with their rooted analogues which have recently drawn much attention in the literature, they have some striking differences in terms of both their structural and computational properties. We expect that our results could eventually have applications to, for example, detecting horizontal gene transfer or hybridization which are important factors in the evolution of many organisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Francis
- Centre for Research in Mathematics, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
| | - K T Huber
- School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
| | - V Moulton
- School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Francis A, Johnson DW, Craig JC, Wong G. Incidence and Predictors of Cancer Following Kidney Transplantation in Childhood. Am J Transplant 2017; 17:2650-2658. [PMID: 28371054 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2016] [Revised: 03/10/2017] [Accepted: 03/18/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Cancer risk is increased substantially in adult kidney transplant recipients, but the long-term risk of cancer in childhood recipients is unclear. Using the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, the authors compared overall and site-specific incidences of cancer after transplantation in childhood recipients with population-based data by using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs). Among 1734 childhood recipients (median age 14 years, 57% male, 85% white), 289 (16.7%) developed cancer (196 nonmelanoma skin cancers, 143 nonskin cancers) over a median follow-up of 13.4 years. The 25-year cumulative incidences of any cancer were 27% (95% confidence intervals 24-30%), 20% (17-23%) for nonmelanoma skin cancer, and 14% (12-17%) for nonskin cancer (including melanoma). The SIR for nonskin cancer was 8.23 (95% CI 6.92-9.73), with the highest risk for posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (SIR 45.80, 95% CI 32.71-62.44) and cervical cancer (29.4, 95% CI 17.5-46.5). Increasing age at transplantation (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] per year 1.10, 95% CI 1.06-1.14), white race (aHR 3.36, 95% CI 1.61-6.79), and having a functioning transplant (aHR 2.27, 95% CI 1.47-3.71) were risk factors for cancer. Cancer risk, particularly for virus-related cancers, is increased substantially after kidney transplantation during childhood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Francis
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, Kids Research Institute at The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - D W Johnson
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.,Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Diamantina Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | - J C Craig
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, Kids Research Institute at The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - G Wong
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, Kids Research Institute at The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia.,Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Francis A, Hudspith RJ, Lewis R, Maltman K. Lattice Prediction for Deeply Bound Doubly Heavy Tetraquarks. Phys Rev Lett 2017; 118:142001. [PMID: 28430484 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.118.142001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2016] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
We investigate the possibility of qq^{'}b[over ¯]b[over ¯] tetraquark bound states using n_{f}=2+1 lattice QCD ensembles with pion masses ≃164, 299, and 415 MeV. Motivated by observations from heavy baryon phenomenology, we consider two lattice interpolating operators, both of which are expected to couple efficiently to tetraquark states: one with a diquark-antidiquark and one with a meson-meson structure. Using nonrelativistic QCD to simulate the bottom quarks, we study the udb[over ¯]b[over ¯], ℓsb[over ¯]b[over ¯] channels with ℓ=u, d, and find unambiguous signals for strong-interaction-stable J^{P}=1^{+} tetraquarks. These states are found to lie 189(10) and 98(7) MeV below the corresponding free two-meson thresholds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Francis
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, York University, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada
| | - R J Hudspith
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, York University, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada
| | - R Lewis
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, York University, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada
| | - K Maltman
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, York University, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada
- CSSM, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Godeke A, Abraimov DV, Arroyo E, Barret N, Bird MD, Francis A, Jaroszynski J, Kurteva DV, Markiewicz WD, Marks EL, Marshall WS, McRae DM, Noyes PD, Pereira RCP, Viouchkov YL, Walsh RP, White JM. A Feasibility Study of High-Strength Bi-2223 Conductor for High-Field Solenoids. Supercond Sci Technol 2017; 30:035011. [PMID: 28360455 PMCID: PMC5367628 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6668/aa5582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
We performed a feasibility study on a high-strength Bi2-x Pb x Sr2Ca2Cu3O10-x (Bi-2223) tape conductor for high-field solenoid applications. The investigated conductor, DI-BSCCO Type HT-XX, is a pre-production version of Type HT-NX, which has recently become available from Sumitomo Electric Industries (SEI). It is based on their DI-BSCCO Type H tape, but laminated with a high-strength Ni-alloy. We used stress-strain characterizations, single- and double-bend tests, easy- and hard-way bent coil-turns at various radii, straight and helical samples in up to 31.2 T background field, and small 20-turn coils in up to 17 T background field to systematically determine the electro-mechanical limits in magnet-relevant conditions. In longitudinal tensile tests at 77 K, we found critical stress- and strain-levels of 516 MPa and 0.57%, respectively. In three decidedly different experiments we detected an amplification of the allowable strain with a combination of pure bending and Lorentz loading to ≥ 0.92% (calculated elastically at the outer tape edge). This significant strain level, and the fact that it is multi-filamentary conductor and available in the reacted and insulated state, makes DI-BSCCO HT-NX highly suitable for very high-field solenoids, for which high current densities and therefore high loads are required to retain manageable magnet dimensions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Godeke
- National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, 1800 East Paul Dirac Drive, Tallahassee, FL 31310, USA,
| | - D V Abraimov
- National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, 1800 East Paul Dirac Drive, Tallahassee, FL 31310, USA,
| | - E Arroyo
- National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, 1800 East Paul Dirac Drive, Tallahassee, FL 31310, USA,
| | - N Barret
- National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, 1800 East Paul Dirac Drive, Tallahassee, FL 31310, USA,
| | - M D Bird
- National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, 1800 East Paul Dirac Drive, Tallahassee, FL 31310, USA,
| | - A Francis
- National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, 1800 East Paul Dirac Drive, Tallahassee, FL 31310, USA,
| | - J Jaroszynski
- National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, 1800 East Paul Dirac Drive, Tallahassee, FL 31310, USA,
| | - D V Kurteva
- National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, 1800 East Paul Dirac Drive, Tallahassee, FL 31310, USA,
| | - W D Markiewicz
- National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, 1800 East Paul Dirac Drive, Tallahassee, FL 31310, USA,
| | - E L Marks
- National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, 1800 East Paul Dirac Drive, Tallahassee, FL 31310, USA,
| | - W S Marshall
- National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, 1800 East Paul Dirac Drive, Tallahassee, FL 31310, USA,
| | - D M McRae
- National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, 1800 East Paul Dirac Drive, Tallahassee, FL 31310, USA,
| | - P D Noyes
- National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, 1800 East Paul Dirac Drive, Tallahassee, FL 31310, USA,
| | - R C P Pereira
- National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, 1800 East Paul Dirac Drive, Tallahassee, FL 31310, USA,
| | - Y L Viouchkov
- National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, 1800 East Paul Dirac Drive, Tallahassee, FL 31310, USA,
| | - R P Walsh
- National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, 1800 East Paul Dirac Drive, Tallahassee, FL 31310, USA,
| | - J M White
- National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, 1800 East Paul Dirac Drive, Tallahassee, FL 31310, USA,
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Thomas J, Hanby A, Pinder S, Pirrie S, Rea D, Gaunt C, Young J, Francis A. Abstract P3-17-06: LORIS trial of active monitoring for DCIS: How does the online pathology eligibility review process work? Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p3-17-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
The LORIS Trial is a UK randomized clinical trial comparing active monitoring with surgery for low risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), defined as low or low-intermediate grade DCIS without comedo necrosis, as diagnosed on vacuum-assisted (wide bore) core needle samples. Because of the inconsistency of grading DCIS, we have underpinned this trial with a Central Histopathology Review (CHR) before randomisation. The process of the CHR for the first 22 months of a two year pilot study between July 2014 and May 2016 is reported here.
Patients and methods
Patients were eligible for CHR if they satisfied all of the eligibility criteria and had locally reported low or intermediate grade DCIS. Patients were identified at 28 pilot sites and were registered for potential trial entry following written informed consent before being subjected to CHR. CHR comprised online examination of digitally scanned histology slides of all material from all diagnostic biopsies and was performed by at least two of the three LORIS specialist breast pathologists. Histology slides were submitted using Royal Mail Safebox® to the University of Birmingham where they were digitally scanned and made available for review via the Leica digital image hub. The outcome of the review was reported in a separate secure online database by completion of a Central Pathology Review Form. Access to both online systems is password protected. Eligibility was confirmed if two pathologists agreed that there was low or low to intermediate grade DCIS and no comedo necrosis. A maximum of 7 calendar days from receipt of the diagnostic material was allowed for the central review process.
The digital images of the histology slides are stored by the Leica system for future reference.
Results
100 patients were registered and their slides reviewed. 55 of these were deemed eligible by CHR; of these 38 have been randomised. 45 patients were deemed ineligible, most commonly due to grade being in the upper half of the intermediate category and/or comedo necrosis. In addition, 9 patients were deemed not to have DCIS and 1 patient had invasive disease.
Grouping the grade categories as low and low to intermediate grade (low risk and eligible for randomisation) Vs intermediate to high and high cytonuclear grade (ineligible for randomisation) showed 91% agreement on grade category amongst the reviewing pathologists.
Results of the central review were made available to sites within 7 days for 97% of cases submitted. On average, central review was completed within 4 days. Average time between registration and randomisation was 3 weeks. The LORIS central review pathologists found online viewing and reporting of sections acceptable.
Conclusions
Central Histopathology Review using online viewing of digital slides provides timely and efficient pathology Quality Assurance in this clinical trial setting, with acceptable turnaround times and good agreement between reviewing specialist breast pathologists. This process will be continued in the main phase of the trial.
Citation Format: Thomas J, Hanby A, Pinder S, Pirrie S, Rea D, Gaunt C, Young J, Francis A. LORIS trial of active monitoring for DCIS: How does the online pathology eligibility review process work? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-17-06.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Thomas
- Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Birmingham, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - A Hanby
- Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Birmingham, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - S Pinder
- Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Birmingham, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - S Pirrie
- Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Birmingham, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - D Rea
- Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Birmingham, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - C Gaunt
- Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Birmingham, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - J Young
- Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Birmingham, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - A Francis
- Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Birmingham, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Singh JK, McEvoy K, Marla S, Wilcox M, Rea D, Hallissey MT, Francis A. Abstract P3-13-05: Multicentre observational study evaluating why mastectomies are advised by UK multi-disciplinary teams. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p3-13-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Marked variation in mastectomy rates exists across the UK. Identification of variation in practice is a key step towards standardisation of service. The rationale for advising mastectomy by multi-disciplinary teams (MDTs) has not been previously explored in the UK. The main aim of this multicentre observational study was to describe current practice in MDT decision-making for patients undergoing mastectomy. A secondary aim was to determine utilisation of neoadjuvant therapies.
Methods: A multicentre, protocol-driven, prospective cohort study, led by trainees of the West Midlands Research Collaborative was performed during July and September 2015. Data was collected securely using Research Electronic Data Capture. Inclusion criteria were: women >18 years undergoing mastectomy for in situ/invasive disease; presenting with symptomatic or screen detected disease; performed as a primary procedure or following failure of breast conserving surgery (BCS); with or without immediate breast reconstruction (IR).
Results: A total of 1776 patients (1823 mastectomies; 47 bilateral procedures) from 68 units were included. Median age was 63 years (range 20-99). In total 481 (26%) IRs were performed; median IR rate was 22% (range 0-67%).
Mastectomy was advised by the MDT in 1402 (77%) cases. Reasons for advising mastectomy are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. MDT rationale for advising mastectomyRationaleNumber of mastectomiesProportion (%)Large tumour to breast size ratio making BCS unsuitable53029.1Multi-centric disease on imaging37220.4Extensive malignant microcalcification1799.8Previous radiotherapy (Breast/Mantle)1638.9Requiring further surgery for positive margins following BCS1588.7Central tumour1136.2Large primary tumour, patient not suitable for neoadjuvant endocrine or chemotherapy treatment1126.1Neoadjuvant therapy failed to downsize tumour to allow BCS884.8Neoadjuvant therapy apparently successful but mastectomy advised anyway794.3Family History-High Risk512.8
In total 153 patients with oestrogen receptor positive (ER+) tumours were offered neoadjuvant endocrine treatment (NET); 131 (86%) received treatment. A total of 293 post-menopausal women with uni-focal, ER+ tumours, >20mm were not offered NET; mastectomy was advised by MDTs in 202 patients and the rationale for advising mastectomy in 173 patients (86%) was large tumour to breast size ratio.
In total 104 patients with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 over-expressing (HER2+) tumours were offered neoadjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab (NACT); 89 (86%) received treatment. A total of 88 women <70 years old with HER2+ tumours, >20mm were not offered NACT; mastectomy was advised by MDTs in 75 patients and rationale for advising mastectomy in 45 women (60%) was large tumour to breast size ratio.
Conclusions: Although most mastectomies are advised for large tumour to breast size ratio, there is inconsistency in the utilisation of neoadjuvant therapies with many potentially eligible patients with large tumours not being given the opportunity to be downsized. Application of standardised recommendations for neoadjuvant treatment resulting in increased and appropriate use of neoadjuvant therapies could reduce the number of mastectomies advised by MDTs.
Citation Format: Singh JK, McEvoy K, Marla S, Wilcox M, Rea D, Hallissey MT, Francis A, West Midlands Research Collaborative. Multicentre observational study evaluating why mastectomies are advised by UK multi-disciplinary teams [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-13-05.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- JK Singh
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom; Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, United Kingdom
| | - K McEvoy
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom; Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, United Kingdom
| | - S Marla
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom; Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, United Kingdom
| | - M Wilcox
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom; Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, United Kingdom
| | - D Rea
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom; Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, United Kingdom
| | - MT Hallissey
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom; Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, United Kingdom
| | - A Francis
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom; Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Francis A, Bartlett J, Billingham L, Bowden S, Brookes C, Dodwell D, Evans A, Fairbrother P, Fallowfield L, Gaunt C, Hanby A, Jenkins V, Matthews L, Pinder S, Pirrie S, Rea D, Reed M, Roberts T, Thomas J, Wallis M, Wilcox M, Young J. Abstract OT1-03-01: The UK LORIS trial: Randomizing patients with low or low intermediate grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to surgery or active monitoring. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-ot1-03-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The independent review of the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme reported (The Lancet, Volume 380, Issue 9855, Page 1778, 17 Nov 2012) on the benefits and harms of breast screening. It concluded that breast screening saves lives and acknowledged the existence of overtreatment. It encouraged randomized trials to elucidate the appropriate treatment of screen-detected DCIS to gain a better understanding of its natural history. The LORIS trial addresses the possible overtreatment of low and low/intermediate grade screen-detected (low risk) DCIS by randomizing patients to standard surgical treatment or active monitoring, each with long term follow up.
Trial Design: LORIS is a phase III, multicentre, 2 arm study, with a built in 2 year Feasibility Phase, in patients confirmed to have low risk DCIS defined by strict criteria and determined by central pathology review. Patients will be randomized between standard surgery and active monitoring with annual mammography. Patients will be followed up for a minimum of 10 years.
Eligibility Criteria:
1) Female, age ≥ 46 years
2) Screen-detected or incidental microcalcification (with no mass lesion clinically or on imaging)
3) Low risk DCIS on large volume vacuum-assisted biopsy, confirmed by central pathology review
4) Patient fit to undergo surgery
5) No previous breast cancer or ipsilateral DCIS diagnosis
6) Written informed consent
Specific Aims: The LORIS Trial aims to establish whether patients with newly diagnosed low risk DCIS can safely avoid surgery without detriment to their wellbeing (psychological and physical) and whether those patients that do require surgery can be identified by pathological and radiological means.
Primary endpoint: Ipsilateral invasive breast cancer free survival time
Secondary endpoints: Overall survival; mastectomy rate; time to mastectomy; time to surgery; patient reported outcomes; health resource utilisation and assessment of predictive biomarkers.
A digital image data repository and tissue bank will provide a prospective resource for both translational and imaging studies.
Statistical Methods: A total of 932 patients will be randomized to a non-inferiority design to test the null hypothesis that active monitoring of women diagnosed with low risk DCIS is not non-inferior in terms of ipsilateral invasive breast cancer free survival (iiBCFS) time compared to treatment with surgery. The iiBCFS time will be compared across the two arms on a per protocol and intent-to-treat basis, using a 1-sided (α=0.05) log-rank test for non-inferiority. The iiBCFS rate is assumed to be 97.5% in the surgery arm at 5 years, utilizing 80% power to exclude a difference of more than 2.5% in the active monitoring arm.
Present Accrual and Target Accrual: 32 UK centres are open for the Feasibility Phase of the trial which is nearing completion. The web-based central pathology review process is functioning efficiently, with a one week maximum turn around. Registrations and sites randomizing patients are on or above target. Randomizations are currently approximately 70% of target. A total of 60 centres will open in the main trial.
Contact Information: For further information, please email the LORIS Trial Office LORIS@trials.bham.ac.uk.
Citation Format: Francis A, Bartlett J, Billingham L, Bowden S, Brookes C, Dodwell D, Evans A, Fairbrother P, Fallowfield L, Gaunt C, Hanby A, Jenkins V, Matthews L, Pinder S, Pirrie S, Rea D, Reed M, Roberts T, Thomas J, Wallis M, Wilcox M, Young J. The UK LORIS trial: Randomizing patients with low or low intermediate grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to surgery or active monitoring [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-03-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Francis
- University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom; St James's Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, England, United Kingdom; SHORE-C, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - J Bartlett
- University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom; St James's Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, England, United Kingdom; SHORE-C, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - L Billingham
- University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom; St James's Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, England, United Kingdom; SHORE-C, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - S Bowden
- University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom; St James's Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, England, United Kingdom; SHORE-C, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - C Brookes
- University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom; St James's Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, England, United Kingdom; SHORE-C, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - D Dodwell
- University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom; St James's Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, England, United Kingdom; SHORE-C, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - A Evans
- University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom; St James's Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, England, United Kingdom; SHORE-C, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - P Fairbrother
- University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom; St James's Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, England, United Kingdom; SHORE-C, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - L Fallowfield
- University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom; St James's Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, England, United Kingdom; SHORE-C, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - C Gaunt
- University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom; St James's Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, England, United Kingdom; SHORE-C, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - A Hanby
- University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom; St James's Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, England, United Kingdom; SHORE-C, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - V Jenkins
- University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom; St James's Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, England, United Kingdom; SHORE-C, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - L Matthews
- University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom; St James's Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, England, United Kingdom; SHORE-C, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - S Pinder
- University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom; St James's Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, England, United Kingdom; SHORE-C, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - S Pirrie
- University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom; St James's Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, England, United Kingdom; SHORE-C, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - D Rea
- University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom; St James's Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, England, United Kingdom; SHORE-C, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - M Reed
- University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom; St James's Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, England, United Kingdom; SHORE-C, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - T Roberts
- University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom; St James's Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, England, United Kingdom; SHORE-C, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - J Thomas
- University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom; St James's Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, England, United Kingdom; SHORE-C, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - M Wallis
- University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom; St James's Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, England, United Kingdom; SHORE-C, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - M Wilcox
- University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom; St James's Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, England, United Kingdom; SHORE-C, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - J Young
- University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom; St James's Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, England, United Kingdom; SHORE-C, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Francis A, Bosio E, Stone SF, Fatovich DM, Arendts G, Nagree Y, Macdonald SPJ, Mitenko H, Rajee M, Burrows S, Brown SGA. Neutrophil activation during acute human anaphylaxis: analysis of MPO and sCD62L. Clin Exp Allergy 2017; 47:361-370. [DOI: 10.1111/cea.12868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2016] [Revised: 10/14/2016] [Accepted: 11/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- A. Francis
- Centre for Clinical Research in Emergency Medicine; Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research; Perth WA Australia
- Discipline of Emergency Medicine; School of Primary; Aboriginal and Rural Health Care; University of Western Australia; Crawley WA Australia
| | - E. Bosio
- Centre for Clinical Research in Emergency Medicine; Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research; Perth WA Australia
- Discipline of Emergency Medicine; School of Primary; Aboriginal and Rural Health Care; University of Western Australia; Crawley WA Australia
| | - S. F. Stone
- Centre for Clinical Research in Emergency Medicine; Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research; Perth WA Australia
- Discipline of Emergency Medicine; School of Primary; Aboriginal and Rural Health Care; University of Western Australia; Crawley WA Australia
| | - D. M. Fatovich
- Centre for Clinical Research in Emergency Medicine; Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research; Perth WA Australia
- Discipline of Emergency Medicine; School of Primary; Aboriginal and Rural Health Care; University of Western Australia; Crawley WA Australia
- Emergency Department; Royal Perth Hospital; Perth WA Australia
| | - G. Arendts
- Centre for Clinical Research in Emergency Medicine; Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research; Perth WA Australia
- Discipline of Emergency Medicine; School of Primary; Aboriginal and Rural Health Care; University of Western Australia; Crawley WA Australia
- Emergency Department; Royal Perth Hospital; Perth WA Australia
- Emergency Department, Fiona Stanley Hospital; Murdoch WA Australia
| | - Y. Nagree
- Centre for Clinical Research in Emergency Medicine; Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research; Perth WA Australia
- Emergency Department, Fiona Stanley Hospital; Murdoch WA Australia
- Emergency Department; Fremantle Hospital; Fremantle WA Australia
| | - S. P. J. Macdonald
- Centre for Clinical Research in Emergency Medicine; Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research; Perth WA Australia
- Discipline of Emergency Medicine; School of Primary; Aboriginal and Rural Health Care; University of Western Australia; Crawley WA Australia
- Emergency Department; Royal Perth Hospital; Perth WA Australia
- Emergency Department; Armadale Kelmscott Memorial Hospital; Mount Nasura WA Australia
| | - H. Mitenko
- Centre for Clinical Research in Emergency Medicine; Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research; Perth WA Australia
- Emergency Department; South West Health Campus; Bunbury WA Australia
| | - M. Rajee
- Centre for Clinical Research in Emergency Medicine; Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research; Perth WA Australia
- Emergency Department; Austin Hospital; Heidelberg VIC Australia
| | - S. Burrows
- School of Medicine & Pharmacology; University of Western Australia; Perth WA Australia
| | - S. G. A. Brown
- Centre for Clinical Research in Emergency Medicine; Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research; Perth WA Australia
- Discipline of Emergency Medicine; School of Primary; Aboriginal and Rural Health Care; University of Western Australia; Crawley WA Australia
- Emergency Department; Royal Perth Hospital; Perth WA Australia
- Emergency Department; Royal Hobart Hospital; Hobart TAS Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Francis A. Editorial. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law 2016. [DOI: 10.1680/jmapl.2016.169.6.229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Adel Francis
- Construction Engineering Department, École de technologie supérieure, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Francis A, Hills C, MacDonald-Wicks L, Johnston C, James D, Surjan Y, Warren-Forward H. Characteristics of an ideal practice educator: Perspectives from practice educators in diagnostic radiography, nuclear medicine, nutrition and dietetics, occupational therapy and physiotherapy and radiation therapy. Radiography (Lond) 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2016.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
28
|
Allanson ER, Tunçalp Ӧ, Gardosi J, Pattinson RC, Vogel JP, Erwich JJHM, Flenady VJ, Frøen JF, Neilson J, Quach A, Francis A, Chou D, Mathai M, Say L, Gülmezoglu AM. Giving a voice to millions: developing the WHO application of ICD-10 to deaths during the perinatal period: ICD-PM. BJOG 2016; 123:1896-1899. [DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- ER Allanson
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences; School of Women's and Infants' Health; University of Western Australia; Crawley WA Australia
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research; Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP); World Health Organization; Geneva Switzerland
| | - Ӧ Tunçalp
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research; Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP); World Health Organization; Geneva Switzerland
| | | | - RC Pattinson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; SAMRC Maternal and Infant Health Care Strategies unit; University of Pretoria; Pretoria South Africa
| | - JP Vogel
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research; Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP); World Health Organization; Geneva Switzerland
| | - JJHM Erwich
- Department of Obstetrics; University of Groningen; University Medical Centre Groningen; Groningen the Netherlands
| | - VJ Flenady
- Mater Research Institute; The University of Queensland (MRI-UQ); Brisbane Qld Australia
- International Stillbirth Alliance; Bristol UK
| | - JF Frøen
- Department of International Public Health; Norwegian Institute of Public Health; Oslo Norway
- Centre for Intervention Science for Maternal and Child Health; University of Bergen; Bergen Norway
| | - J Neilson
- Centre for Women's Health Research; University of Liverpool; Liverpool UK
| | - A Quach
- Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences; Yakima WA USA
| | | | - D Chou
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research; Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP); World Health Organization; Geneva Switzerland
| | - M Mathai
- Maternal & Perinatal Health; Department of Maternal, Newborn Child & Adolescent Health; World Health Organization; Geneva Switzerland
| | - L Say
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research; Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP); World Health Organization; Geneva Switzerland
| | - AM Gülmezoglu
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research; Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP); World Health Organization; Geneva Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Allanson ER, Vogel JP, Tunçalp Ӧ, Gardosi J, Pattinson RC, Francis A, Erwich J, Flenady VJ, Frøen JF, Neilson J, Quach A, Chou D, Mathai M, Say L, Gülmezoglu AM. Application of ICD-PM to preterm-related neonatal deaths in South Africa and United Kingdom. BJOG 2016; 123:2029-2036. [PMID: 27527390 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We explore preterm-related neonatal deaths using the WHO application of the International Classification of Disease (ICD-10) to deaths during the perinatal period: ICD-PM as an informative case study, where ICD-PM can improve data use to guide clinical practice and programmatic decision-making. DESIGN Retrospective application of ICD-PM. SETTING South Africa, and the UK. POPULATION Perinatal death databases. METHODS Descriptive analysis of neonatal deaths and maternal conditions present. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Causes of preterm neonatal mortality and associated maternal conditions. RESULTS We included 98 term and 173 preterm early neonatal deaths from South Africa, and 956 term and 3248 preterm neonatal deaths from the UK. In the South African data set, the main causes of death were respiratory/cardiovascular disorders (34.7%), low birthweight/prematurity (29.2%), and disorders of cerebral status (25.5%). Amongst preterm deaths, low birthweight/prematurity (43.9%) and respiratory/cardiovascular disorders (32.4%) were the leading causes. In the data set from the UK, the leading causes of death were low birthweight/prematurity (31.6%), congenital abnormalities (27.4%), and deaths of unspecified cause (26.1%). In the preterm deaths, the leading causes were low birthweight/prematurity (40.9%) and deaths of unspecified cause (29.6%). In South Africa, 61% of preterm deaths resulted from the maternal condition of preterm spontaneous labour. Among the preterm deaths in the data set from the UK, no maternal condition was present in 36%, followed by complications of placenta, cord, and membranes (23%), and other complications of labour and delivery (22%). CONCLUSIONS ICD-PM can be used to appraise the maternal and newborn conditions contributing to preterm deaths, and can inform practice. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT ICD-PM can be used to appraise maternal and newborn contributors to preterm deaths to improve quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E R Allanson
- School of Women's and Infants' Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia. .,Department of Reproductive Health and Research, including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - J P Vogel
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ӧ Tunçalp
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - J Gardosi
- Perinatal Institute, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - R C Pattinson
- SAMRC Maternal and Infant Health Care Strategies Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - A Francis
- Perinatal Institute, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jjhm Erwich
- Department of Obstetrics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - V J Flenady
- Mater Research Institute, The University of Queensland (MRI-UQ), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,International Stillbirth Alliance, Bristol, UK
| | - J F Frøen
- Department of International Public Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.,Centre for Intervention Science for Maternal and Child Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - J Neilson
- Centre for Women's Health Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - A Quach
- Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences, Yakima, WA, USA
| | - D Chou
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - M Mathai
- Maternal & Perinatal Health, Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child & Adolescent Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - L Say
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - A M Gülmezoglu
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Allanson ER, Tunçalp Ö, Gardosi J, Pattinson RC, Francis A, Vogel JP, Erwich J, Flenady VJ, Frøen JF, Neilson J, Quach A, Chou D, Mathai M, Say L, Gülmezoglu AM. The WHO application of ICD-10 to deaths during the perinatal period (ICD-PM): results from pilot database testing in South Africa and United Kingdom. BJOG 2016; 123:2019-2028. [PMID: 27527122 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To apply the World Health Organization (WHO) Application of the International Classification of Diseases, tenth revision (ICD-10) to deaths during the perinatal period: ICD-Perinatal Mortality (ICD-PM) to existing perinatal death databases. DESIGN Retrospective application of ICD-PM. SETTING South Africa, UK. POPULATION Perinatal death databases. METHODS Deaths were grouped according to timing of death and then by the ICD-PM cause of death. The main maternal condition at the time of perinatal death was assigned to each case. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Causes of perinatal mortality, associated maternal conditions. RESULTS In South Africa 344/689 (50%) deaths occurred antepartum, 11% (n = 74) intrapartum and 39% (n = 271) in the early neonatal period. In the UK 4377/9067 (48.3%) deaths occurred antepartum, with 457 (5%) intrapartum and 4233 (46.7%) in the neonatal period. Antepartum deaths were due to unspecified causes (59%), chromosomal abnormalities (21%) or problems related to fetal growth (14%). Intrapartum deaths followed acute intrapartum events (69%); neonatal deaths followed consequences of low birthweight/ prematurity (31%), chromosomal abnormalities (26%), or unspecified causes in healthy mothers (25%). Mothers were often healthy; 53%, 38% and 45% in the antepartum, intrapartum and neonatal death groups, respectively. Where there was a maternal condition, it was most often maternal medical conditions, and complications of placenta, cord and membranes. CONCLUSIONS The ICD-PM can be a globally applicable perinatal death classification system that emphasises the need for a focus on the mother-baby dyad as we move beyond 2015. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT ICD-PM is a global system that classifies perinatal deaths and links them to maternal conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E R Allanson
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, School of Women's and Infants' Health, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia. , .,Department of Reproductive Health and Research including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. ,
| | - Ö Tunçalp
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - R C Pattinson
- SAMRC Maternal and Infant Health Care Strategies Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | | | - J P Vogel
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jjhm Erwich
- Department of Obstetrics, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - V J Flenady
- Mater Research Institute, The University of Queensland (MRI-UQ), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,International Stillbirth Alliance, Bristol, UK
| | - J F Frøen
- Department of International Public Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - J Neilson
- Centre for Intervention Science for Maternal and Child Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Centre for Women's Health Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - A Quach
- Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences, Yakima, Washington, USA
| | - D Chou
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - M Mathai
- Maternal & Perinatal Health, Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child & Adolescent Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - L Say
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - A M Gülmezoglu
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Allanson ER, Tunçalp Ӧ, Gardosi J, Pattinson RC, Francis A, Vogel JP, Erwich J, Flenady VJ, Frøen JF, Neilson J, Quach A, Chou D, Mathai M, Say L, Gülmezoglu AM. Optimising the International Classification of Diseases to identify the maternal condition in the case of perinatal death. BJOG 2016; 123:2037-2046. [PMID: 27527550 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The WHO application of the tenth edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) to deaths during the perinatal period (ICD Perinatal Mortality, ICD-PM) captures the essential characteristics of the mother-baby dyad that contribute to perinatal deaths. We compare the capture of maternal conditions in the existing ICD-PM with the maternal codes from the WHO application of ICD-10 to deaths during pregnancy, childbirth, and the puerperium (ICD Maternal Mortality, ICD-MM) to explore potential benefits in the quality of data received. DESIGN Retrospective application of ICD-PM. SETTING South Africa and the UK. POPULATION Perinatal death databases. METHODS The maternal conditions were classified using the ICD-PM groupings for maternal condition in perinatal death, and then mapped to the ICD-MM groupings of maternal conditions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Main maternal conditions in perinatal deaths. RESULTS We reviewed 9661 perinatal deaths. The largest group (4766 cases, 49.3%) in both classifications captures deaths where there was no contributing maternal condition. Each of the other ICD-PM groups map to between three and six ICD-MM groups. If the cases in each ICD-PM group are re-coded using ICD-MM, each group becomes multiple, more specific groups. For example, the 712 cases in group M4 in ICD-PM become 14 different and more specific main disease categories when the ICD-MM is applied instead. CONCLUSIONS As we move towards ICD-11, the use of the more specific, applicable, and relevant codes outlined in ICD-MM for both maternal deaths and the maternal condition at the time of a perinatal death would be preferable, and would provide important additional information about perinatal deaths. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Improving the capture of maternal conditions in perinatal deaths provides important actionable information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E R Allanson
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Health Sciences, School of Women's and Infants' Health, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia. .,Department of Reproductive Health and Research, including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Ӧ Tunçalp
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - J Gardosi
- Perinatal Institute, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - R C Pattinson
- SAMRC Maternal and Infant Health Care Strategies Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - A Francis
- Perinatal Institute, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - J P Vogel
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jjhm Erwich
- Department of Obstetrics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - V J Flenady
- Mater Research Institute, The University of Queensland (MRI-UQ), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,International Stillbirth Alliance, Bristol, UK
| | - J F Frøen
- Department of International Public Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.,Centre for Intervention Science for Maternal and Child Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - J Neilson
- Centre for Women's Health Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - A Quach
- Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences, Yakima, WA, USA
| | - D Chou
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - M Mathai
- Maternal & Perinatal Health, Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child & Adolescent Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - L Say
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - A M Gülmezoglu
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
The main goal of graphical modelling is to communicate information clearly and effectively through graphical means. Little research has been undertaken in the domain of construction scheduling. It can be noted that there is no standard graphics protocol; therefore, it is up to each individual planner to set his or her own standard. This paper develops a new chronographical conceptual framework that describes all the elements required to perform construction operations, their processes, their logical constraints and their association and organisational models. The protocol studies the suitable visual parameters and their associated values in order to define a standard graphical presentation using shapes, sketches, codes, text, textures and colours. This protocol aims to overcome the current difficulties with graphical visualisation of the considerable amount of data needed for effective planning and to increase the effectiveness of visual research based on human visual habits. The validation process was performed using case studies that evaluated visual data and assessed the necessary mental effort required to find information on the schedule. The graphical convention of textures and colours has already been validated. The results have clearly demonstrated that this convention helps to simplify the process of searching for information on the schedule.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adel Francis
- Department of Construction Engineering, École de technologie supérieure, Quebec University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Francis A, Bartlett J, Rea D, Pinder S, Stein R, Stobart H, Purdie C, Rakha E, Thompson A, Shaaban A. Viewpoint: Availability of oestrogen receptor and HER2 status for the breast multidisciplinary meeting discussion; time to get it right. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016; 42:994-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2015] [Revised: 01/28/2016] [Accepted: 02/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
34
|
Rea D, Francis A, Poole C, Brookes C, Stein R, Bartlett J, Dunn J, Canney P, Sutton R, Daoud R, Hallissey M, Achuthan R, Grant M, Babrah J, Smith S, Fraser J, Desai A, Al Dubaisi M, Patel A, Bristol J, Chandrasekharan S, Prest C, Jewkes A. Abstract PD2-02: NEO-EXCEL phase III neoadjuvant trial of pre-operative exemestane or letrozole +/- celecoxib in the treatment of ER positive postmenopausal early breast cancer. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-pd2-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
COX2 has been implicated in breast tumorigenesis, tumour proliferation & invasion. The role of COX2 in carcinogenesis is thought to be related to its abilities to increase production of prostaglandins, convert pro-carcinogens to carcinogens, inhibit apoptosis, promote angiogenesis, modulate inflammation & immune function & increase tumour cell invasiveness. COX2 inhibition may synergise with aromatase inhibition in controlling endocrine responsive breast cancer. The COX2 product prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) & cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL6) can up regulate aromatase expression suggesting that aromatase inhibition may be more effective in combination with a COX2 inhibitor. There may be additional COX2 mediated anticancer activity. The hypothesis addressed is that activity of aromatase inhibitors(AI) as neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for early breast cancer may be enhanced by the addition of a COX2 inhibitor.
TRIAL OBJECTIVES
To determine whether the activity of AIs as neo-adjuvant endocrine therapy for ER positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women may be enhanced by the addition of the selective COX2 inhibitor celecoxib.
TRIAL DESIGN
Prospective phase III multicentre randomised trial. Patients were randomised to receive 16 weeks of exemestane 25 mg daily or letrozole 2.5 mg daily (open label) and celecoxib 400 mg twice daily or matched placebo (double blinded). Translational research tumour samples were collected before, during & after therapy.
KEY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Post menopausal, ER positive, invasive cancer, 2cms or greater with calipers & visible on USS.
PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE
Objective clinical response to neoadjuvant treatment by RECIST criteria.
RESULTS
Primary Outcome; Response to treatment has been calculated for 266 patients (Table 1). Response rate was 73% in the celecoxib arm & 55% in the placebo arm (p=0.0022). The response rates 4 arm comparison are shown in Table 2. After adjustment for AI effect the significant difference in response rates remained (p=0.0023); the difference in response rates was greater in the exemestane treated group (29%) compared to the letrozole group (7%) although heterogeneity between AI arms was statistically non-significant (p=0.06).
Table 1 Primary Outcome Results: response ratesOUTCOMEPLACEBO N (%)CELECOXIB N (%)TOTAL N (%)X2statisticP-valueRESPONSE73(55)97(73%)170 (64%)9.38820.0022NO RESPONSE60 (45%)36 (27%)96 (36%) TOTAL133133266
Table 2: Response Rates 4 Arm Comparison EXEMESTANELETROZOLERESPONSEPLACEBO n(%)CELECOXIB n(%)TOTAL n(%)PLACEBO n(%)CELECOXIB n(%)TOTAL n(%)RESPONSE33 (49)52(78)85(63)40(61)45(68)85(64)NO RESPONSE34(51)15(22)49(37)26(39)21(32)47(36)TOTAL67671346666132
Secondary outcome; There was an USS response rate of 42% v 37% for celecoxib & placebo arms respectively (p=0.2513)
CONCLUSION
The addition of the COX2 inhibitor celecoxib to an AI significantly & substantially increased the clinical response from 55% to 73%. Effect on tumour size assessed with USS is less marked with a non-significant increase in responses from 37% to 42%.
This work was supported by CRUK: CRUK/06/005 and Pfizer.
Citation Format: Rea D, Francis A, Poole C, Brookes C, Stein R, Bartlett J, Dunn J, Canney P, Sutton R, Daoud R, Hallissey M, Achuthan R, Grant M, Babrah J, Smith S, Fraser J, Desai A, Al Dubaisi M, Patel A, Bristol J, Chandrasekharan S, Prest C, Jewkes A. NEO-EXCEL phase III neoadjuvant trial of pre-operative exemestane or letrozole +/- celecoxib in the treatment of ER positive postmenopausal early breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Rea
- On behalf of All the NEO-EXCEL Investigators University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; University Hospital, Coventry, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Good Hope Hospital, Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Royal United Hospital, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom; Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, Surrey, United Kingdom; St James's University Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; City Hospital, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom; Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, Kent, United Kingdom; Barnet Hospital, Barnet, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; St Margaret's Hospita
| | - A Francis
- On behalf of All the NEO-EXCEL Investigators University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; University Hospital, Coventry, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Good Hope Hospital, Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Royal United Hospital, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom; Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, Surrey, United Kingdom; St James's University Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; City Hospital, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom; Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, Kent, United Kingdom; Barnet Hospital, Barnet, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; St Margaret's Hospita
| | - C Poole
- On behalf of All the NEO-EXCEL Investigators University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; University Hospital, Coventry, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Good Hope Hospital, Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Royal United Hospital, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom; Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, Surrey, United Kingdom; St James's University Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; City Hospital, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom; Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, Kent, United Kingdom; Barnet Hospital, Barnet, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; St Margaret's Hospita
| | - C Brookes
- On behalf of All the NEO-EXCEL Investigators University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; University Hospital, Coventry, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Good Hope Hospital, Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Royal United Hospital, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom; Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, Surrey, United Kingdom; St James's University Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; City Hospital, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom; Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, Kent, United Kingdom; Barnet Hospital, Barnet, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; St Margaret's Hospita
| | - R Stein
- On behalf of All the NEO-EXCEL Investigators University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; University Hospital, Coventry, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Good Hope Hospital, Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Royal United Hospital, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom; Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, Surrey, United Kingdom; St James's University Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; City Hospital, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom; Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, Kent, United Kingdom; Barnet Hospital, Barnet, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; St Margaret's Hospita
| | - J Bartlett
- On behalf of All the NEO-EXCEL Investigators University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; University Hospital, Coventry, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Good Hope Hospital, Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Royal United Hospital, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom; Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, Surrey, United Kingdom; St James's University Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; City Hospital, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom; Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, Kent, United Kingdom; Barnet Hospital, Barnet, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; St Margaret's Hospita
| | - J Dunn
- On behalf of All the NEO-EXCEL Investigators University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; University Hospital, Coventry, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Good Hope Hospital, Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Royal United Hospital, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom; Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, Surrey, United Kingdom; St James's University Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; City Hospital, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom; Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, Kent, United Kingdom; Barnet Hospital, Barnet, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; St Margaret's Hospita
| | - P Canney
- On behalf of All the NEO-EXCEL Investigators University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; University Hospital, Coventry, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Good Hope Hospital, Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Royal United Hospital, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom; Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, Surrey, United Kingdom; St James's University Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; City Hospital, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom; Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, Kent, United Kingdom; Barnet Hospital, Barnet, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; St Margaret's Hospita
| | - R Sutton
- On behalf of All the NEO-EXCEL Investigators University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; University Hospital, Coventry, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Good Hope Hospital, Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Royal United Hospital, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom; Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, Surrey, United Kingdom; St James's University Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; City Hospital, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom; Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, Kent, United Kingdom; Barnet Hospital, Barnet, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; St Margaret's Hospita
| | - R Daoud
- On behalf of All the NEO-EXCEL Investigators University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; University Hospital, Coventry, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Good Hope Hospital, Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Royal United Hospital, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom; Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, Surrey, United Kingdom; St James's University Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; City Hospital, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom; Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, Kent, United Kingdom; Barnet Hospital, Barnet, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; St Margaret's Hospita
| | - M Hallissey
- On behalf of All the NEO-EXCEL Investigators University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; University Hospital, Coventry, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Good Hope Hospital, Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Royal United Hospital, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom; Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, Surrey, United Kingdom; St James's University Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; City Hospital, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom; Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, Kent, United Kingdom; Barnet Hospital, Barnet, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; St Margaret's Hospita
| | - R Achuthan
- On behalf of All the NEO-EXCEL Investigators University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; University Hospital, Coventry, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Good Hope Hospital, Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Royal United Hospital, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom; Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, Surrey, United Kingdom; St James's University Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; City Hospital, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom; Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, Kent, United Kingdom; Barnet Hospital, Barnet, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; St Margaret's Hospita
| | - M Grant
- On behalf of All the NEO-EXCEL Investigators University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; University Hospital, Coventry, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Good Hope Hospital, Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Royal United Hospital, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom; Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, Surrey, United Kingdom; St James's University Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; City Hospital, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom; Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, Kent, United Kingdom; Barnet Hospital, Barnet, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; St Margaret's Hospita
| | - J Babrah
- On behalf of All the NEO-EXCEL Investigators University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; University Hospital, Coventry, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Good Hope Hospital, Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Royal United Hospital, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom; Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, Surrey, United Kingdom; St James's University Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; City Hospital, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom; Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, Kent, United Kingdom; Barnet Hospital, Barnet, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; St Margaret's Hospita
| | - S Smith
- On behalf of All the NEO-EXCEL Investigators University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; University Hospital, Coventry, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Good Hope Hospital, Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Royal United Hospital, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom; Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, Surrey, United Kingdom; St James's University Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; City Hospital, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom; Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, Kent, United Kingdom; Barnet Hospital, Barnet, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; St Margaret's Hospita
| | - J Fraser
- On behalf of All the NEO-EXCEL Investigators University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; University Hospital, Coventry, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Good Hope Hospital, Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Royal United Hospital, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom; Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, Surrey, United Kingdom; St James's University Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; City Hospital, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom; Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, Kent, United Kingdom; Barnet Hospital, Barnet, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; St Margaret's Hospita
| | - A Desai
- On behalf of All the NEO-EXCEL Investigators University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; University Hospital, Coventry, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Good Hope Hospital, Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Royal United Hospital, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom; Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, Surrey, United Kingdom; St James's University Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; City Hospital, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom; Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, Kent, United Kingdom; Barnet Hospital, Barnet, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; St Margaret's Hospita
| | - M Al Dubaisi
- On behalf of All the NEO-EXCEL Investigators University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; University Hospital, Coventry, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Good Hope Hospital, Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Royal United Hospital, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom; Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, Surrey, United Kingdom; St James's University Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; City Hospital, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom; Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, Kent, United Kingdom; Barnet Hospital, Barnet, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; St Margaret's Hospita
| | - A Patel
- On behalf of All the NEO-EXCEL Investigators University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; University Hospital, Coventry, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Good Hope Hospital, Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Royal United Hospital, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom; Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, Surrey, United Kingdom; St James's University Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; City Hospital, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom; Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, Kent, United Kingdom; Barnet Hospital, Barnet, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; St Margaret's Hospita
| | - J Bristol
- On behalf of All the NEO-EXCEL Investigators University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; University Hospital, Coventry, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Good Hope Hospital, Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Royal United Hospital, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom; Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, Surrey, United Kingdom; St James's University Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; City Hospital, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom; Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, Kent, United Kingdom; Barnet Hospital, Barnet, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; St Margaret's Hospita
| | - S Chandrasekharan
- On behalf of All the NEO-EXCEL Investigators University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; University Hospital, Coventry, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Good Hope Hospital, Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Royal United Hospital, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom; Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, Surrey, United Kingdom; St James's University Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; City Hospital, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom; Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, Kent, United Kingdom; Barnet Hospital, Barnet, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; St Margaret's Hospita
| | - C Prest
- On behalf of All the NEO-EXCEL Investigators University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; University Hospital, Coventry, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Good Hope Hospital, Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Royal United Hospital, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom; Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, Surrey, United Kingdom; St James's University Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; City Hospital, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom; Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, Kent, United Kingdom; Barnet Hospital, Barnet, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; St Margaret's Hospita
| | - A Jewkes
- On behalf of All the NEO-EXCEL Investigators University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; University Hospital, Coventry, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Good Hope Hospital, Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Royal United Hospital, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom; Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, Surrey, United Kingdom; St James's University Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; City Hospital, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom; Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, Kent, United Kingdom; Barnet Hospital, Barnet, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; St Margaret's Hospita
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Stein RC, Marshall A, Hall PS, Bartlett JMS, Rooshenas L, Campbell A, Cameron DA, Rea D, Macpherson I, Earl HM, Poole CJ, Francis A, Morgan A, Harmer V, Pinder SE, Stallard N, Donovan J, Hulme C, McCabe C, Hughes-Davies L, Makris A, Dunn JA. Abstract OT3-02-12: OPTIMA (optimal personalised treatment of early breast cancer usIng multi-parameter analysis), a prospective trial to validate the predictive utility and cost-effectiveness of gene expression test-directed chemotherapy decisions. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-ot3-02-12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Multi-parameter gene expression assays (MPAs) are widely used to estimate individual patient residual risk and to guide chemotherapy use in hormone-sensitive HER2-negative node-negative early breast cancer. These uses of MPAs have not yet been prospectively validated. OPTIMA aims to validate the use of MPA testing to predict chemotherapy sensitivity in a largely node-positive breast cancer population.
Methods: OPTIMA is a partially blinded multi-center, phase 3 randomized controlled trial with an adaptive two-stage design. The preliminary phase (OPTIMA prelim) evaluated the performance of MPAs to identify a suitable test(s) to be used in the main efficacy trial and assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a large UK trial. Eligible patients are men or women aged 40 years or older who have surgically resected early stage breast cancer, which is ER-positive and HER2-negative and who have either 1-9 involved axillary lymph nodes or tumors of at least 30mm diameter. Randomization is to standard management (chemotherapy followed by endocrine therapy) or to MPA-directed treatment. Those with a tumor categorized as "high-risk" by the test will be assigned to standard management whilst those at "low-risk" will be treated with endocrine therapy alone. OPTIMA prelim used Oncotype DX as the primary discriminator; the main trial will use Prosigna (PAM50). The co-primary outcomes are (1) Invasive Disease Free Survival (IDFS) and (2) cost-effectiveness of test-directed therapy compared to standard practice. Secondary outcomes include IDFS in "low-risk" patients, distant disease free survival, breast cancer specific survival, overall survival and quality of life. An integrated qualitative recruitment study will identify and address challenges to recruitment and informed consent. Tumor blocks from all consenting participants will be banked allowing the performance of alternative MPA technologies to be evaluated. Recruitment of 4500 patients over 4 years will permit demonstration of 3% non-inferiority of test-directed treatment, with 5% significance and 85% power, assuming 3 years follow-up and a control arm 5-year IDFS of at least 85%. The addition of patients from OPTIMA prelim will allow non-inferiority to be assessed with 2.5% significance.
Results: OPTIMA-prelim recruited 412 patients in 23 months from 35 sites. It confirmed the acceptability of randomization to patients with a 47% acceptance rate, and to clinicians and hence the feasibility of a large prospective trial of test-directed treatment running in 100-plus UK sites. It showed that investment into research on test-directed therapy, especially with Prosigna, should be of substantial value to the NHS.
Conclusion: OPTIMA, as one of two large scale prospective trials validating the use of test-guided chemotherapy in node-positive hormone-sensitive early breast cancer will have a global impact on patient treatment. Recruitment into the main efficacy trial will commence in October 2015.
Funding: Project funded by the UK NIHR HTA Programme (10/34/501). Views expressed are those of the authors and not those of the HTA Programme, NIHR, NHS or the DoH.
Citation Format: Stein RC, Marshall A, Hall PS, Bartlett JMS, Rooshenas L, Campbell A, Cameron DA, Rea D, Macpherson I, Earl HM, Poole CJ, Francis A, Morgan A, Harmer V, Pinder SE, Stallard N, Donovan J, Hulme C, McCabe C, Hughes-Davies L, Makris A, Dunn JA. OPTIMA (optimal personalised treatment of early breast cancer usIng multi-parameter analysis), a prospective trial to validate the predictive utility and cost-effectiveness of gene expression test-directed chemotherapy decisions. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-02-12.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- RC Stein
- National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Institute for Cancer Studies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, United Kingdom; Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS
| | - A Marshall
- National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Institute for Cancer Studies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, United Kingdom; Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS
| | - PS Hall
- National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Institute for Cancer Studies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, United Kingdom; Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS
| | - JMS Bartlett
- National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Institute for Cancer Studies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, United Kingdom; Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS
| | - L Rooshenas
- National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Institute for Cancer Studies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, United Kingdom; Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS
| | - A Campbell
- National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Institute for Cancer Studies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, United Kingdom; Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS
| | - DA Cameron
- National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Institute for Cancer Studies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, United Kingdom; Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS
| | - D Rea
- National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Institute for Cancer Studies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, United Kingdom; Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS
| | - I Macpherson
- National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Institute for Cancer Studies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, United Kingdom; Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS
| | - HM Earl
- National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Institute for Cancer Studies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, United Kingdom; Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS
| | - CJ Poole
- National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Institute for Cancer Studies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, United Kingdom; Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS
| | - A Francis
- National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Institute for Cancer Studies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, United Kingdom; Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS
| | - A Morgan
- National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Institute for Cancer Studies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, United Kingdom; Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS
| | - V Harmer
- National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Institute for Cancer Studies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, United Kingdom; Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS
| | - SE Pinder
- National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Institute for Cancer Studies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, United Kingdom; Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS
| | - N Stallard
- National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Institute for Cancer Studies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, United Kingdom; Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS
| | - J Donovan
- National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Institute for Cancer Studies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, United Kingdom; Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS
| | - C Hulme
- National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Institute for Cancer Studies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, United Kingdom; Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS
| | - C McCabe
- National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Institute for Cancer Studies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, United Kingdom; Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS
| | - L Hughes-Davies
- National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Institute for Cancer Studies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, United Kingdom; Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS
| | - A Makris
- National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Institute for Cancer Studies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, United Kingdom; Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS
| | - JA Dunn
- National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom; University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Institute for Cancer Studies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, United Kingdom; Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Francis A, Fallowfield L, Bartlett J, Thomas J, Wallis M, Hanby A, Pinder S, Evans A, Billingham L, Brookes C, Dodwell D, Fairbrother P, Gaunt C, Jenkins V, Matthews L, Pirrie S, Reed M, Roberts T, Wilcox M, Young J, Rea D. Abstract OT2-02-04: The LORIS trial: A multicentre, randomised phase III trial of standard surgery versus active monitoring in women with newly diagnosed low risk ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-ot2-02-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The independent review of the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme reported (The Lancet, Volume 380, Issue 9855, Pages 1778 - 1786, 17 November 2012) on the benefits & harms of breast screening. It concluded that breast screening saves lives & acknowledged overtreatment. It encouraged randomized trials to elucidate the appropriate treatment of screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to gain a better understanding of its natural history. The LORIS trial addresses overtreatment of low & low/Intermediate grade screen detected (low risk) DCIS by randomizing patients to standard surgical treatment or active monitoring.
Trial Design: LORIS is a phase III, multicentre, 2 arm study, with a 2 year feasibility phase, in patients confirmed to have low risk DCIS by central pathology review. Patients are randomised to standard surgery or active monitoring with annual mammography. Patients will be followed up for a minimum of 10 years.
Key Eligibility Criteria:
1) Female 46 years or over.
2) Screen-detected or incidental microcalcification (with no mass lesion clinically or on imaging)
3) Low risk DCIS on large volume vacuum-assisted biopsy, confirmed by central pathology review
4) Patient fit to undergo surgery
Specific Aims: The LORIS Trial aims to establish whether patients with newly diagnosed low risk DCIS can safely avoid surgery without detriment to their wellbeing (psychological and physical) & whether those patients that do require surgery can be identified by pathological and radiological means.
Primary endpoint: Ipsilateral invasive breast cancer free survival rate at 5 years
Secondary endpoints: Overall survival; mastectomy rate; time to mastectomy; time to surgery; patient reported outcomes & health resource utilisation.
A digital image data repository and tissue bank provide a prospective resource for both translational & imaging studies.
Statistical Methods: A total of 932 patients will be randomized to a non-inferiority design to test the null hypothesis that active monitoring of women diagnosed with low risk DCIS is not non-inferior in terms of 5 year ipsilateral invasive breast cancer free survival (iiBCFS) rate compared to treatment with surgery. The iiBCFS rate will be compared across the two arms on a per protocol and intent-to-treat basis, using a 1-sided (α=0.05) log-rank test for non-inferiority. The iiBCFS rate is assumed to be 97.5% in the surgery arm giving 80% power to exclude a difference of more than 2.5% in the active monitoring arm at 5 years.
Present Accrual and Target Accrual: 21 UK centres are open & the feasibility phase of the trial is recruiting to target. The web based central pathology review process is functioning well with a one week maximum turn around. A further 40 centres will be opened on completion of the feasibility phase.
Contact: LORIS@trials.bham.ac.uk
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research [Health Technology Assessment Programme] (project number 11/36/16)
Department of Health Disclaimer: The views & opinions expressed therein are those of the authors & do not necessarily reflect those of the Health Technology Assessment Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.
Citation Format: Francis A, Fallowfield L, Bartlett J, Thomas J, Wallis M, Hanby A, Pinder S, Evans A, Billingham L, Brookes C, Dodwell D, Fairbrother P, Gaunt C, Jenkins V, Matthews L, Pirrie S, Reed M, Roberts T, Wilcox M, Young J, Rea D. The LORIS trial: A multicentre, randomised phase III trial of standard surgery versus active monitoring in women with newly diagnosed low risk ductal carcinoma in situ. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-02-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Francis
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C) Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, Yorkshire, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; ICPV, London, United Kingdom; Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom
| | - L Fallowfield
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C) Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, Yorkshire, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; ICPV, London, United Kingdom; Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom
| | - J Bartlett
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C) Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, Yorkshire, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; ICPV, London, United Kingdom; Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom
| | - J Thomas
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C) Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, Yorkshire, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; ICPV, London, United Kingdom; Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom
| | - M Wallis
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C) Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, Yorkshire, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; ICPV, London, United Kingdom; Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom
| | - A Hanby
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C) Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, Yorkshire, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; ICPV, London, United Kingdom; Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom
| | - S Pinder
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C) Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, Yorkshire, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; ICPV, London, United Kingdom; Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom
| | - A Evans
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C) Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, Yorkshire, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; ICPV, London, United Kingdom; Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom
| | - L Billingham
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C) Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, Yorkshire, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; ICPV, London, United Kingdom; Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom
| | - C Brookes
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C) Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, Yorkshire, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; ICPV, London, United Kingdom; Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom
| | - D Dodwell
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C) Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, Yorkshire, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; ICPV, London, United Kingdom; Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom
| | - P Fairbrother
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C) Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, Yorkshire, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; ICPV, London, United Kingdom; Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom
| | - C Gaunt
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C) Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, Yorkshire, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; ICPV, London, United Kingdom; Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom
| | - V Jenkins
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C) Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, Yorkshire, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; ICPV, London, United Kingdom; Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom
| | - L Matthews
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C) Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, Yorkshire, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; ICPV, London, United Kingdom; Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom
| | - S Pirrie
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C) Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, Yorkshire, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; ICPV, London, United Kingdom; Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom
| | - M Reed
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C) Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, Yorkshire, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; ICPV, London, United Kingdom; Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom
| | - T Roberts
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C) Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, Yorkshire, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; ICPV, London, United Kingdom; Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom
| | - M Wilcox
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C) Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, Yorkshire, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; ICPV, London, United Kingdom; Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom
| | - J Young
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C) Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, Yorkshire, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; ICPV, London, United Kingdom; Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom
| | - D Rea
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C) Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, Yorkshire, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom; ICPV, London, United Kingdom; Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Sobotka SA, Francis A, Vander Ploeg Booth K. Associations of family characteristics with perceptions of care among parents of children with autism. Child Care Health Dev 2016; 42:135-40. [PMID: 26470756 DOI: 10.1111/cch.12290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2014] [Revised: 07/16/2015] [Accepted: 08/19/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is an increasingly common chronic disability, primary care provider (PCPs) report deficits in providing primary care for children with ASD, and parents report lapses in receipt of medical home services. In this study, we describe parental experiences with specific medical home components for their children with ASD. METHODS We analysed data from all children within the National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs database with ASD and a usual place for care (n = 2859). We evaluated the receipt of core medical home components: accessible, comprehensive, coordinated, family centred and compassionate and culturally sensitive care. RESULTS Children were mean age 10.1 years, and respondents were 75% mothers and 95% reported having a primary care provider (PCP). Seventy-one percent reported care to be usually comprehensive, over three-fourths of respondents reported care to be family centred and compassionate and 87% reported care to be culturally sensitive. Of the parents who reported a need for care coordination (n = 1049), only 14% of parents reported usually getting the help they needed. More educated, English-speaking, non-Hispanic White mothers of older children supported by private insurance were more likely to report never getting as much help coordinating care as desired. Coordination with education services are especially important for children with ASD, yet 27% of parents reported dissatisfaction with PCPs' communication with schools or early intervention. CONCLUSION Although parents report a high level of access to PCPs and places for care as well as receiving most core components of the medical home, care coordination activities are lacking for children with ASD. More resourced families are particularly likely to report unmet needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S A Sobotka
- Section of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - A Francis
- Advocate Children's Hospital-Park Ridge, Park Ridge, IL, USA
| | - K Vander Ploeg Booth
- Section of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
|
39
|
Francis A, Yang Y, Virtanen S, Boccaccini AR. Iron and iron-based alloys for temporary cardiovascular applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2015; 26:138. [PMID: 25716025 DOI: 10.1007/s10856-015-5473-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2014] [Accepted: 01/20/2015] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
In the last decade, biodegradable metals have emerged as a topic of interest for particular biomedical applications which require high strength to bulk ratio, including for cardiovascular stents. The advantages of biodegradable materials are related to the reduction of long term risks associated with the presence of permanent metal implants, e.g. chronic inflammation and in-stent restenosis. From a structural point of view, the analysis of the literature reveals that iron-based alloys used as temporary biodegradable stents have several advantages over Mg-based alloys in terms of ductility and strength. Efforts on the modification and tunability of iron-based alloys design and compositions have been mainly focused on controlling the degradation rate while retaining the mechanical integrity within a reasonable period. The early pre-clinical results of many iron-based alloys seem promising for future implants developments. This review discusses the available literature focusing mainly on: (i) Fe and Fe-based alloys design and fabrication techniques; (ii) in vitro and in vivo performance; (iii) cytotoxicity and cell viability tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Francis
- Department of Advanced Materials, Central Metallurgical R&D Institute (CMRDI), P.O. Box 87, Helwan, Cairo, Egypt,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hodgetts VA, Morris RK, Francis A, Gardosi J, Ismail KM. Effectiveness of folic acid supplementation in pregnancy on reducing the risk of small-for-gestational age neonates: a population study, systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2014; 122:478-90. [PMID: 25424556 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/03/2014] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the effect of timing of folic acid (FA) supplementation during pregnancy on the risk of the neonate being small for gestational age (SGA). DESIGN A population database study and a systematic review with meta-analysis including the results of this population study. SETTING AND DATA SOURCES A UK regional database was used for the population study and an electronic literature search (from inception until August 2013) for the systematic review. PARTICIPANTS AND INCLUDED STUDIES Singleton live births with no known congenital anomalies; 111,736 in population study and 188,796 in systematic review. OUTCOME MEASURES, DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS The main outcome was SGA based on customised birthweight centile. Associations are presented as odds ratios (OR) and adjusted odds ratios (aOR), adjusted for maternal and pregnancy-related characteristics. RESULTS Of 108,525 pregnancies with information about FA supplementation, 92,133 (84.9%) had taken FA during pregnancy. Time of commencement of supplementation was recorded in 39,416 pregnancies, of which FA was commenced before conception in 10,036, (25.5%) cases. Preconception commencement of FA supplementation was associated with reduced risk of SGA <10th centile (aOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.71-0.90, P < 0.01) and SGA <5th centile (aOR 0.78, 95% CI 0.66-0.91, P < 0.01). This result was reproduced when the data were pooled with other studies in the systematic review, showing a significant reduction in SGA (<5th centile) births with preconception commencement of FA (aOR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61-0.92, P < 0.006). In contrast, postconception folate had no significant effect on SGA rates. CONCLUSION Supplementation with FA significantly reduces the risk of SGA at birth but only if commenced preconceptually independent of other risk factors. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION This systematic review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO number CRD42013004895.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V A Hodgetts
- Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Francis A, Fallowfield L, Rea D. The LORIS Trial: Addressing overtreatment of ductal carcinoma in situ. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2014; 27:6-8. [PMID: 25445552 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2014.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2014] [Revised: 09/15/2014] [Accepted: 09/29/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- A Francis
- Breast Surgery Department, Nuffield House Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
| | - L Fallowfield
- Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C), Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK
| | - D Rea
- Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Francis A. Editorial. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law 2014. [DOI: 10.1680/mpal.2014.167.5.207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Adel Francis
- Associate Professor, Director of Certificate Programs Construction Engineering Department, École de technologie supérieure, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ding HT, Francis A, Kaczmarek O, Karsch F, Satz H, Söldner W. Charmonium dissociation and heavy quark transport in hot quenched lattice QCD. EPJ Web of Conferences 2014. [DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/20147000061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
44
|
Shaaban AM, Purdie CA, Bartlett JMS, Stein RC, Lane S, Francis A, Thompson AM, Pinder SE. HER2 testing for breast carcinoma: recommendations for rapid diagnostic pathways in clinical practice. J Clin Pathol 2013; 67:161-7. [DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2013-201819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
|
45
|
Rea D, Tomlins A, Francis A. Time to stop operating on breast cancer patients with pathological complete response? Eur J Surg Oncol 2013; 39:924-30. [PMID: 23845702 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2013] [Revised: 05/29/2013] [Accepted: 06/06/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Surgery is an obligatory component of treatment for early breast cancer. The last 20 years developments in systemic neoadjuvant therapy have progressively increased pathological complete response (pCR). Pathological complete response is associated with excellent prognosis especially for hormone receptor negative cancers. Therapeutic advances and recognition of the importance of pathological subtype in predicting pCR facilitate identification of subgroups with very high pCR rates. Treatment of HER2 positive hormone receptor negative cancers with combination chemotherapy and multiple targeted anti-HER2 agents results in consistently high pCR rates of 60-83%. Routine surgery in this setting where most patients have no potential to benefit is of questionable value and the option of omitting surgery in these patients should now be explored in a randomized trial. For HER2 positive disease not achieving pCR after neoadjuvant treatment the outcomes are poor. Trials are underway to determine if outcomes for these patients can be improved with alternative targeted therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Rea
- CR-UK Clinical Trials Unit, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Francis A. The chronographical approach for construction project modelling. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law 2013. [DOI: 10.1680/mpal.12.00009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Graphical modelling is considered a suitable approach for displaying project data because of its ability effectively to communicate information. The current scheduling methods seem to be unable, individually, to meet all of the planner’s needs, to be understood visually and to be efficient in terms of displaying as much information as possible. The main purpose of this paper is to present the chronographical approach for planning and monitoring construction projects. The chronographical approach is a more complete communication method, having the ability to alternate from one visual approach to another by manipulation of graphics by way of a set of defined graphical parameters. Each individual approach can help to schedule a certain project type or speciality, show valuable information in a clear and comprehensible manner and facilitate the management of construction site problems visually. Visual communication can also be improved through layering, sheeting, juxtaposition, alterations and permutations, allowing for groupings, hierarchies and classification of project information. In this way, graphical representation becomes a living, transformable image, thus assisting planners in solving problems of a variable nature, and simplifying site management while simultaneously using the visual space as efficiently as possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adel Francis
- Department of Construction Engineering, École de Technologie Supérieure, Quebec University, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Francis A, Bibai J, Miresco E. Simulation of scheduling logic using dynamic functions. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law 2013. [DOI: 10.1680/mpal.11.00049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Since the late 1950s, researchers have studied the soft logic of scheduling, in particular the precedence constraint between activities used to compute the critical path. However, by proposing only external constraints and simulating work production through lags, the precedence logic lacks precision. These gaps diminish the reliability of the schedule and impair the internal monitoring of activity interdependencies. Chronographic logic addresses such limitations by introducing the internal division and proposing internal monitoring as a function of production. This paper proposes the concept of probabilistic production-based dynamic functions which would replace internal divisions with a mathematical function that permits the tracking of the dynamic interdependencies between two in-progress activities. A case study compares the overall schedule calculation using traditional precedence logic with the dynamic production-based function. This simulation was designed to investigate the overall impact on the critical path and the criticality of each activity. The result is a new method of implementing scheduling logic that takes into account the impact of the internal changes of workload and allows the use of internal margins. These self-adaptations provide a better simulation of construction-site conditions which help to produce more realistic results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adel Francis
- École de Technologie Supérieure, Quebec University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Edmond Miresco
- École de Technologie Supérieure, Quebec University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Bartlett J, Canney P, Campbell A, Cameron D, Donovan J, Dunn J, Earl H, Francis A, Hall P, Harmer V, Higgins H, Hillier L, Hulme C, Hughes-Davies L, Makris A, Morgan A, McCabe C, Pinder S, Poole C, Rea D, Stallard N, Stein R. Selecting breast cancer patients for chemotherapy: the opening of the UK OPTIMA trial. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2012; 25:109-16. [PMID: 23267818 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2012.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2012] [Revised: 09/19/2012] [Accepted: 10/19/2012] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The mortality from breast cancer has improved steadily over the past two decades, in part because of the increased use of more effective adjuvant therapies. Thousands of women are routinely treated with intensive chemotherapy, which can be unpleasant, is expensive and is occasionally hazardous. Oncologists have long known that some of these women may not need treatment, either because they have a low risk of relapse or because they have tumour biology that makes them less sensitive to chemotherapy and more suitable for early adjuvant endocrine therapy. There is an urgent need to improve patient selection so that chemotherapy is restricted to those patients who will benefit from it. Here we review the emerging technologies that are available for improving patient selection for chemotherapy. We describe the OPTIMA trial, which has just opened to recruitment in the UK, is the latest addition to trials in this area, and is the first to focus on the relative cost-effectiveness of alternate predictive assays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Bartlett
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Soumian S, Down SK, Roked F, Chaudhri S, Francis A. P5-12-02: Vacuum Assisted Biopsies of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Concordance with Post-Operative Histology: Implications for the Low Risk DCIS Trial. Cancer Res 2011. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs11-p5-12-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Aim The enormous increase in the diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) by the NHS Breast screening has not lead to an expected decrease in the incidence of invasive breast cancer. It is not clear if all grades of DCIS progress inexorably to invasive cancer if left untreated. There is recognition that DCIS is overtreated, ie if left alone may not cause harm during the woman's lifetime. In the absence of new clinical trial data, surgery still remains the universal treatment. It is known that a higher proportion of patients with screen detected DCIS receive mastectomy than those with screen detected invasive cancer. Recently a randomized trial called the Low risk DCIS Trial has been proposed which intends to specifically compare the current treatment of low grade DCIS ie surgery with active monitoring using annual mammography. In order to effectively implement this, concordance between diagnostic biopsy and excision histology is vital and therefore vacuum assisted mammotome biopsy (VAB) and a central pathology review of diagnostic biopsy specimens prior to randomization will be mandatory. Therefore, in this study, we assessed the concordance between diagnostic biopsies performed by VAB technique and the post operative histology for DCIS in our institution.
Methods Retrospective data of all diagnostic breast biopsies specifically using the VAB technique with the primary diagnosis of DCIS from year 2001 to 2010 in our institution was collected. Both screening and symptomatic patients were included. Concordance between diagnostic histology and post operative excision histology was assessed for high, intermediate and low grade DCIS. Demographic details and potential factors influencing concordance including number of cores taken and lesion size were also collected for analysis.
Results A total of 161 cases were identified out of which 102 (63%) were of high grade, 35 (22%) of intermediate grade and 24 (15%) were of low grade histology. In the High grade group, the concordance with final histology was 70% (72/102). In this group, the diagnosis was upgraded to invasive carcinoma in 21% (21/102). 9% (9/102) were downgraded to intermediate or low grade. In the intermediate grade group, the concordance with final histology was 66% (23/35). In this group, the diagnosis was upgraded to invasive carcinoma in 11% (4/35) and to high grade in 17% (6/35). 6% (2/35) were downgraded to low grade. In the low grade group, the concordance with final histology was 71% (17/24). In this group, the diagnosis was upgraded to intermediate grade in 17% (4/24) and invasive carcinoma in 12% (3/24). All factors associated with lack of concordance were noted.
Conclusion Concordance between VAB diagnostic biopsies of high, intermediate and low grade DCIS and post operative histology is good in this series and is to our knowledge the first to be reported using only large volume biopsies by VAB techniques. This audit has identified possible factors influencing the lack of concordance and these results with concordance data from other UK centres will be used by trial pathologists to refine protocols for the Low risk DCIS trial.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-12-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Soumian
- 1Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom
| | - SK Down
- 1Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom
| | - F Roked
- 1Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom
| | - S Chaudhri
- 1Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom
| | - A Francis
- 1Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Kharasch ED, Francis A, London A, Frey K, Kim T, Blood J. Sensitivity of intravenous and oral alfentanil and pupillary miosis as minimal and noninvasive probes for hepatic and first-pass CYP3A induction. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011; 90:100-8. [PMID: 21562488 DOI: 10.1038/clpt.2011.59] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Systemic and oral clearances of alfentanil (ALF) are in vivo probes for hepatic and first-pass cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A. Both ALF single-point plasma concentrations and miosis are surrogates for area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and clearance and are minimal and noninvasive CYP3A probes. This investigation determined ALF sensitivity for detecting graded CYP3A induction and compared it with that of midazolam (MDZ). Twelve volunteers (sequential crossover) received 0, 5, 10, 25, or 75 mg oral rifampin for 5 days. MDZ and ALF were given intravenously and orally on sequential days. Dark-adapted pupil diameter was measured with blood sampling. Graded rifampin decreased plasma MDZ AUCs to 83, 76, 62, and 59% (intravenous (i.v.)) and 78, 66, 39, and 24% (oral) of control. Hepatic and first-pass CYP3A induction were detected comparably by plasma MDZ and ALF AUCs. Single ALF concentrations detected all CYP3A induction, whereas MDZ was less sensitive. ALF miosis detected induction of first-pass but not hepatic CYP3A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E D Kharasch
- Division of Clinical and Translational Research, Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|