[Cancer in people with an intellectual disability in Germany: prevalence, genetics, and care situation]

Intellectual disability has a prevalence rate of approximately 1% of the population; in Germany, this is around 0.5-1 million people. The life expectancy of this group of people is reduced, with cancer being one of the most common causes of death (approx. 20%). Overall, the risk of cancer and mortality is increased compared to the general population.Certain genetic syndromes predispose to cancer in this vulnerable group, but associated comorbidities or lifestyle could also be risk factors for cancer. People with cognitive impairments are less likely to attend preventive check-ups, and challenges arise in medical care due to physical, communicative, and interactional characteristics. Optimized cooperation between clinical centers for people with disabilities and the respective cancer centers is required in order to tailor the processes to the individual.In Germany, there is a lack of data on the prevalence of cancer entities and the use and need for healthcare services. There is an urgent need to focus attention on cancer prevention, treatment, and research in the vulnerable and heterogeneous group of people with intellectual disabilities suffering from cancer in order to effectively counteract the increase in cancer-related deaths in this population group.The article summarizes specialist knowledge on cancer in people with an intellectual disability, identifies special features of treatment, presents care structures, and derives specific requirements for clinics and research.

Perioperative or only adjuvant gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for resectable pancreatic cancer (NEONAX)-a randomized phase II trial of the AIO pancreatic cancer group

BACKGROUND

Data on perioperative chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (rPDAC) are limited. NEONAX examined perioperative or adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in rPDAC (National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

NEONAX is a prospective, randomized phase II trial with two independent experimental arms. One hundred twenty-seven rPDAC patients in 22 German centers were randomized 1 : 1 to perioperative (two pre-operative and four post-operative cycles, arm A) or adjuvant (six cycles, arm B) gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) and nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) at 18 months in the modified intention-to-treat (ITT) population [R0/R1-resected patients who started neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CTX) (A) or adjuvant CTX (B)]. The pre-defined DFS rate of 55% at 18 months was not reached in both arms [A: 33.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 18.5% to 48.1%), B: 41.4% (95% CI 20.7% to 62.0%)]. Ninety percent of patients in arm A completed neoadjuvant treatment, and 42% of patients in arm B started adjuvant chemotherapy. R0 resection rate was 88% (arm A) and 67% (arm B), respectively. Median overall survival (mOS) (ITT population) as a secondary endpoint was 25.5 months (95% CI 19.7-29.7 months) in arm A and 16.7 months (95% CI 11.6-22.2 months) in the upfront surgery arm. This difference corresponds to a median DFS (mDFS) (ITT) of 11.5 months (95% CI 8.8-14.5 months) in arm A and 5.9 months (95% CI 3.6-11.5 months) in arm B. Treatment was safe and well tolerable in both arms.

CONCLUSIONS

The primary endpoint, DFS rate of 55% at 18 months (mITT population), was not reached in either arm of the trial and numerically favored the upfront surgery arm B. mOS (ITT population), a secondary endpoint, numerically favored the neoadjuvant arm A [25.5 months (95% CI 19.7-29.7months); arm B 16.7 months (95% CI 11.6-22.2 months)]. There was a difference in chemotherapy exposure with 90% of patients in arm A completing pre-operative chemotherapy and 58% of patients starting adjuvant chemotherapy in arm B. Neoadjuvant/perioperative treatment is a novel option for patients with resectable PDAC. However, the optimal treatment regimen has yet to be defined. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02047513) and the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT 2013-005559-34).

Prognosis and tumor biology of pancreatic cancer patients with isolated lung metastases: translational results from the German multicenter AIO-YMO-PAK-0515 study

Background

Pulmonary metastasis (M1-PUL) as first site of dissemination in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a rare event and may define a distinct biological subgroup.

Patients and methods

Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie-Young Medical Oncologists-Pankreas-0515 study (AIO-YMO-PAK-0515) was a retrospective German multicenter study investigating clinical and molecular characteristics of M1-PUL PDAC patients; 115 M1-PUL PDAC patients from 7 participating centers were included. Clinical characteristics and potential prognostic factors were defined within the M1-PUL cohort. Archival tumor samples were analyzed for Her2/neu, HNF1A and KRT81 expression. Additionally, messenger RNA (mRNA) expression analysis (using a 770-gene immune profiling panel) was carried out in the M1-PUL and in a control cohort (M1-ANY).

Results

Median overall survival in the entire M1-PUL cohort was 20 months; the most favorable prognosis (median survival: 28 months) was observed in the subgroup of 66 PDAC patients with metachronous lung metastases after previous curative-intent surgery. The number of metastatic lesions, uni- or bilateral lung involvement as well as metastasectomy were identified as potential prognostic factors. Her2/neu expression and PDAC subtyping (by HNF1A and KRT81) did not differ between the M1-PUL and the M1-ANY cohort. mRNA expression analysis revealed significant differentially expressed genes between both cohorts: CD63 and LAMP1 were among the top 20 differentially expressed genes and were identified as potential mediators of organotropism and favorable survival outcome of M1-PUL patients.

Conclusion

M1-PUL represents a clinically favorable cohort in PDAC patients. Site of relapse might already be predetermined at the time of surgery and could potentially be predicted by gene expression profiling.

•

The retrospective multicenter AIO-YMO-PAK-0515 study defines M1-PUL as a clinically favorable subgroup in PDAC.

•

The number of metastatic lesions, bilateral lung involvement and surgical metastasectomy may serve as prognostic factors.

•

Immune-related gene expression differs between patients with isolated pulmonary relapse versus other sites of relapse.

Predicting resistance to first-line FOLFOX plus bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: Final results of the multicenter, international PERMAD trial

115

Background: Antiangiogenic agents, in particular monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against VEGF, a major driver of tumor angiogenesis, are widely used in cancer therapy including metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, some patients do not profit from antiangiogenic treatments (AT), other patients benefit initially, but subsequently develop resistance not only to chemotherapy but also to AT. So far, no biomarkers are available to predict resistance to AT. Having an accurate assessment of imminent resistance to an AT may e.g. enable to respond by treating the patient with a more broadly acting antiangiogenic agent and thereby further delay resistance to the treatment and at the same time avoid employing a not anymore efficacious treatment. We hypothesized that repeated analysis of multiple cytokines related to angiogenesis together with machine learning approaches may enable an accurate prediction of anti-VEGF resistance during first-line treatment of mCRC patients with FOLFOX plus bevacizumab. The PERMAD trial aimed at establishing a CAF marker combination that enables the prediction of treatment resistance of patients with mCRC receiving Bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 in a palliative first-line setting about three months prior to radiological progress using an omics approach and bioinformatics. Methods: A phase I/II biomarker trial was conducted, including 15 centers in Germany and Austria. All mCRC patients included were treatment naïve and received FOLFOX plus Bevacizumab treatment. 102 different, preselected CAFs were prospectively collected and centrally analyzed in plasma samples (n = 647) obtained prior to treatment and biweekly until radiological progress determined by CT scan every 2 months. The values of CAFs affected in a similar fashion by both chemotherapy and disease progress were excluded. Using the remaining CAFs we employed a random forest predictor to define a combination of 5 CAF (CAF marker combination) whose change in values/pattern correlated with subsequent progress 3 months prior to radiological progress according to RECIST 1.1. Results: Using the samples described above and a random forest predictor we established a CAF marker combination comprising 5 CAF whose specific change in value/pattern over time indicated treatment resistance 3 months prior to radiological progress. The model allowed to differentiate timepoints without progress from timepoints predicting progress 100 days before radiological progress with an accuracy of 83%, a sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 88%. Conclusions: Using advanced bioinformatics, we identified a CAF marker combination that points out treatment resistance to FOLFOX plus Bevacizumab in patients with mCRC 3 months prior to radiological progress. Clinical trial information: NCT02331927.

Nintedanib plus mFOLFOX6 as second-line treatment of metastatic, chemorefractory colorectal cancer: The randomised, placebo-controlled, phase II TRICC-C study (AIO-KRK-0111)

Nintedanib is a triple angiokinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1-3, fibroblast growth factor receptor 1-3 and platelet-derived growth factor receptor-a/-b. Thereby, it targets angiogenic escape mechanisms. The trial TyRosine kinase Inhibitor for the treatment of Chemorefractory Colorectal Cancer (TRICC-C) trial evaluates the addition of nintedanib to mFOLFOX6 (fluorouracil, folinic acid and oxaliplatin) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). TRICC-C is a randomised controlled, double-blinded, phase II trial in mCRC patients that received a first-line non-oxaliplatin containing chemotherapy. Patients received mFOLFOX6 + nintedanib (F + N) (2 × 200 mg p.o./d, d1-d14) or mFOLFOX6 + placebo (F + P), in a 1:1 ratio. Primary endpoint was median progression free survival (mPFS) and secondary overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and safety. Fifty-three patients (27 F + N; 26 F + P) were randomised between 12/2012 and 5/2016 (scheduled n = 180). The trial was terminated prematurely due to slow accrual. The trial did not reach its primary endpoint but mPFS, median overall survival (mOS) and disease control rate (DCR) were numerically higher in the F + N arm compared to the F + P arm; however, the difference was not significant (mPFS: F + P: 4.6 months vs F + N: 8.1 months; HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.32-1.30; P = .2156; mOS: F + P: 9.9 months vs F + N: 17.1 months; HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.48-2.23; P = .9387; DCR: F + P: 50% vs F + N: 66,7%; P = .2709). Toxicity was moderate and only different for neutropenia (F + P: 11.5%, F + N: 19.2%) and gastrointestinal disorders (F + P: 65.4%, F + N: 84.6%). Final results show safety and a nonsignificant trend towards improved PFS and DCR for the combination of mFOLFOX6 + nintedanib in the second-line therapy of mCRC.

Nal-IRI with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin or gemcitabine plus cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer - the NIFE trial (AIO-YMO HEP-0315) an open label, non-comparative, randomized, multicenter phase II study

Background

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) has a high mortality. Primary diagnosis is frequently delayed due to mostly unspecific symptoms, resulting in a high number of advanced cases at the time of diagnosis. Advanced BTCs are in principle chemotherapy sensitive as determined by improved disease control, survival and quality of life (QoL). However, median OS does not exceed 11.7 months with the current standard of care gemcitabine plus cisplatin. Thereby, novel drug formulations like nanoliposomal-irinotecan (nal-IRI) in combination with 5- fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin may have the potential to improve therapeutic outcomes in this disease.

Methods

NIFE is an interventional, prospective, randomized, controlled, open label, two-sided phase II study. Within the study, 2 × 46 patients with locally advanced, non-resectable or metastatic BTC are to be enrolled by two stage design of Simon. Data analysis will be done unconnected for both arms. Patients are allocated in two arms: Arm A (experimental intervention) nal-IRI mg/m², 46 h infusion)/5-FU (2400 mg/m², 46 h infusion)/leucovorin (400 mg/m², 0.5 h infusion) d1 on 14 day-cycles; Arm B (standard of care) cisplatin (25 mg/m², 1 h infusion)/gemcitabine (1000 mg/m², 0.5 h infusion) d1 and d8 on 21 day-cycles. The randomization (1:1) is stratified for tumor site (intrahepatic vs. extrahepatic biliary tract), disease stage (advanced vs. metastatic), age (≤70 vs. > 70 years), sex (male vs. female) and WHO performance score (ECOG 0 vs. ECOG 1). Primary endpoint of the study is the progression free survival (PFS) rate at 4 months after randomization by an intention-to-treat analysis in each of the groups. Secondary endpoints are the overall PFS rate, the 3-year overall survival rate, the disease control rate after 2 months, safety and patient related outcome with quality of life. The initial assessment of tumor resectability for locally advanced BTCs is planned to be reviewed retrospectively by a central surgical board. Exploratory objectives aim at establishing novel biomarkers and molecular signatures to predict response. The study was initiated January 2018 in Germany.

Discussion

The NIFE trial evaluates the potential of a nanoliposomal-irinotecan/5-FU/leucovorin combination in the first line therapy of advanced BTCs and additionally offers a unique chance for translational research.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03044587. Registration Date February 7th 2017.

Genotyping of circulating tumor DNA in cholangiocarcinoma reveals diagnostic and prognostic information

Diagnosis of Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is difficult, thus a noninvasive approach towards (i) assessing and (ii) monitoring the tumor-specific mutational profile is desirable to improve diagnosis and tailor treatment. Tumor tissue and corresponding ctDNA samples were collected from patients with CCA prior to and during chemotherapy and were subjected to deep sequencing of 15 genes frequently mutated in CCA. A set of ctDNA samples was also submitted for 710 gene oncopanel sequencing to identify progression signatures. The blood/tissue concordance was 74% overall and 92% for intrahepatic tumors only. Variant allele frequency (VAF) in ctDNA correlated with tumor load and in the group of intrahepatic CCA with PFS. 63% of therapy naive patients had their mutational profile changed during chemotherapy. A set of 76 potential progression driver genes was identified among 710 candidates. The molecular landscape of CCA is accessible via ctDNA. This could be helpful to facilitate diagnosis and personalize and adapt therapeutic strategies.

NEONAX trial: Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant or only adjuvant nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for resectable pancreatic cancer, a phase II study of the AIO pancreatic cancer group (AIO-PAK-0313)—Safety interim analysis

4128

Background: Survival in pancreatic cancer (PDAC) is still poor even after curatively intended resection. Perioperative treatment approaches improve outcome in various tumor entities. Data on perioperative treatment in resectable PDAC are limited and there is a debate whether neoadjuvant treatment might impair subsequent surgery by adding perioperative morbidity or mortality. Methods: NEONAX is a randomized phase II study (planned 166 patients) of perioperative gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (Arm A: 2 pre- and 4 post-operative cycles, Arm B: 6 cycles adjuvant) for patients with primarily resectable PDAC. Primary objective is DFS at 18 months after randomization. Secondary objectives are 3-year OS-rate and DFS-rate, progression during neoadjuvant therapy, R0/R1 resection rate and QoL. Results: NEONAX was initiated in March 2015 in 26 centers for PDAC surgery in Germany. The data represent the safety interim analysis (IA) of the first 48 patients. 25 patients were randomized to Arm A and 23 to Arm B. Patients’ median age was 65.3 years (56.3% males, 43.8% females, 85.4% ECOG 0). Out of 25 patients in Arm A 20 patients (80%) underwent surgery, compared to 21 of 23 patients (91.3%) in Arm B with upfront surgery. Reasons for no resection were intraoperatively determined small liver metastases (2 cases, Arm A), withdrawal of informed consent (2 cases in each arm) and 1 patient with uncontrolled cholestasis (arm A). Postoperative complications occurred in 45% of arm A and 42.8% of arm B. (pancreatic fistula: 15% in arm A and 9.5% in arm B, infections: 10% in arm A and 9.5% in arm B) All resected patients were alive 60 days after surgery. At least 1 adverse event (AE) NCI-CTCAE ≥ grade 3 occurred in 60% of the perioperative and 39.1% of adjuvant treatment arm. Most common AEs were neutropenia (16.7%), fatigue (10.4%) and infections (10.4%). Conclusions: There was an increase in NCI-CTCAE ≥ grade 3 events in the perioperative arm, but this was manageable and did not result in increased peri- or postoperative mortality. 8% of patients in the perioperative arm did not get resected due metastases detectable during surgery, but not on preoperative imaging immediately prior to surgery. Therefore, it cannot be determined whether these metastases were preexistent or developed during neoadjuvant treatment. In conclusion, the first interim analysis of the NEONAX trial shows that this protocol can be safely applied to patients with resectable PDAC in a perioperative setting. Clinical trial information: NCT02047513.

A Blood-Based Multi Marker Assay Supports the Differential Diagnosis of Early-Stage Pancreatic Cancer

The most frequent malignancy of the pancreas is the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Despite many efforts PDAC has still a dismal prognosis. Biomarkers for early disease stage diagnosis as a prerequisite for a potentially curative treatment are still missing. Novel blood-based markers may help to overcome this limitation.

Methods: Prior to surgery plasma levels of thrombospondin-2 (THBS2), which was recently published as a novel biomarker, and CA19-9 from 52 patients with histologically proven PDAC were determined, circulating cell-free (cfDNA) was quantified. 15 patients with side-branch IPMNs without worrisome features and 32 patients with chronic pancreatitis served for comparison. Logit (logistic regression) models were used to test the performance of single biomarkers and biomarker combinations.

Results: CA19-9 and THBS2 alone showed comparable c-statistics of 0.80 and 0.73, respectively, improving to 0.87 when combining these two markers. The c-statistic was further increased to 0.94 when combining CA19-9 and THBS2 with cfDNA quantification. This marker combination performed best for all PDAC stages but also for PDACs grouped by stage. The greatest improvement over CA19-9 was seen in the group of stage I PDAC, from 0.69 to 0.90 for the three marker combination.

Conclusion:These data establish the combination of CA19-9, THBS2 and cfDNA as a composite liquid biomarker for non-invasive diagnosis of early-stage PDAC.

Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant or only adjuvant nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for resectable pancreatic cancer - the NEONAX trial (AIO-PAK-0313), a prospective, randomized, controlled, phase II study of the AIO pancreatic cancer group

Background

Even clearly resectable pancreatic cancer still has an unfavorable prognosis. Neoadjuvant or perioperative therapies might improve the prognosis of these patients. Thus, evaluation of perioperative chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer in a prospective, randomized trial is warranted. A substantial improvement in overall survival of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer with FOLFIRINOX and nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine vs standard gemcitabine has been demonstrated in phase III-trials. Indeed nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine has a more favorable toxicity profile compared to the FOLFIRINOX protocol and appears applicable in a perioperative setting.

Methods

NEONAX is an interventional, prospective, randomized, controlled, open label, two sided phase II study with an unconnected analysis of the results in both experimental arms against a fixed survival probability (38% at 18 months with adjuvant gemcitabine), NCT02047513. NEONAX will enroll 166 patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (≤ cT3, N0 or N1, cM0) in two arms: Arm A (perioperative arm): 2 cycles nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2)/gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2, d1, 8 and 15 of an 28 day-cycle) followed by tumor surgery followed by 4 cycles nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine, Arm B (adjuvant arm): tumor surgery followed by 6 cycles nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine. The randomization (1:1) is eminent to avoid allocation bias between the groups. Randomization is stratified for tumor stage (ct1/2 vs. cT3) and lymph node status (cN0 vs. cN1). Primary objective is disease free survival (DFS) at 18 months after randomization. Key secondary objectives are 3-year overall survival (OS) rate and DFS rate, progression during neoadjuvant therapy, R0 and R1 resection rate, quality of life and correlation of DFS, OS and tumor regression with pharmacogenomic markers, tumor biomarkers and molecular analyses (ctDNA, transcriptome, miRNA-arrays). In addition, circulating tumor-DNA will be analyzed in patients with the best and the worst responses to the neoadjuvant treatment. The study was initiated in March 2015 in 26 centers for pancreatic surgery in Germany.

Discussion

The NEONAX trial is an innovative study on resectable pancreatic cancer and currently one of the largest trials in this field of research. It addresses the question of the role of intensified perioperative treatment with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in resectable pancreatic cancers to improve disease-free survival and offers a unique potential for translational research.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02047513, 08/13/2014.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-5183-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Targeted deep sequencing of circulating tumor DNA in metastatic pancreatic cancer

Purpose

Precision medicine in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) could be substantially supported by tools that allow to establish and monitor the molecular setup of the tumor. In particular, noninvasive approaches are desirable, but not validated. Characterization of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may help to achieve this goal.

Experimental Design

Blood samples from patients with metastatic PDAC prior to and during palliative treatment were collected. ctDNA and corresponding tumor tissue were analyzed by targeted next generation sequencing and droplet digital PCR for the 7 most frequently mutated genes in PDAC (TP53, SMAD4, CDKN2A, KRAS, APC, ATM, and FBXW7). Findings were correlated with clinical and imaging data.

Results

A total of 20 patients (therapy naïve n = 11; pretreated n = 9) were included. All therapy naïve patients (n = 11/11) presented with detectable ctDNA at baseline. In pretreated patients, 3/7 (prior to 2nd line treatment) and 2/2 (prior to 3rd line chemotherapy) had detectable ctDNA. The combined mutational allele frequency (CMAF) of KRAS and TP53 was chosen to reflect the amount of ctDNA. The median CMAF level significantly decreased during treatment (P = 0.0027) and increased at progression (P = 0.0104). CA19-9 analyses did not show significant differences. In treatment naïve patients, the CMAF levels during therapy significantly correlated with progression-free survival (Spearman, r = -0.8609, P = 0.0013).

Conclusions

Monitoring of ctDNA and its changes during treatment may enable to adapt therapeutic strategies to the specific molecular changes present at a certain time during treatment of mPDAC.

Algorithm guided outlining of 105 pancreatic cancer liver metastases in Ultrasound

Manual segmentation of hepatic metastases in ultrasound images acquired from patients suffering from pancreatic cancer is common practice. Semiautomatic measurements promising assistance in this process are often assessed using a small number of lesions performed by examiners who already know the algorithm. In this work, we present the application of an algorithm for the segmentation of liver metastases due to pancreatic cancer using a set of 105 different images of metastases. The algorithm and the two examiners had never assessed the images before. The examiners first performed a manual segmentation and, after five weeks, a semiautomatic segmentation using the algorithm. They were satisfied in up to 90% of the cases with the semiautomatic segmentation results. Using the algorithm was significantly faster and resulted in a median Dice similarity score of over 80%. Estimation of the inter-operator variability by using the intra class correlation coefficient was good with 0.8. In conclusion, the algorithm facilitates fast and accurate segmentation of liver metastases, comparable to the current gold standard of manual segmentation.

[Cystic pancreatic tumors: diagnostics and new biomarkers]

Mortality due to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) will increase in the near future. The only curative treatment for PDAC is radical resection; however, even small carcinomas exhibit micrometastases leading to early relapse. Accordingly, detection of premalignant precursor lesions is important. In essence, PDAC develops from three precursor lesions: pancreatic intraepithelial lesions (PanIN), intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasia (IPMN) and mucinous-cystic neoplasia (MCN). Together with serous cystic neoplasia (SCN) and solid pseudopapillary neoplasia (SPN), these cystic lesions constitute the most common cystic neoplasms in the pancreas. In the case of IPMN, main and branch duct IPMN have to be differentiated because of a markedly different malignancy potential. While main duct IPMN and MCN have a high malignancy transformation rate, branch duct IPMNs are more variable with respect to malignant transformation. This shows that differential diagnosis of cystic lesions is important; however, this is often very difficult to accomplish using conventional imaging. Novel biomarkers and diagnostic tools based on the molecular differences of cystic pancreatic lesions could be helpful to differentiate these lesions and facilitate early diagnosis. The aim is to distinguish the premalignant cysts from strictly benign cystic lesions and a timely detection of malignant transformation. This article provides an overview on the molecular characteristics of cystic pancreatic lesions as a basis for improved diagnostics and the development of new biomarkers.

Genetic Biopsy for Prediction of Surveillance Intervals after Endoscopic Resection of Colonic Polyps: Results of the GENESIS Study

Background and objective

Current surveillance strategies for colorectal cancer following polypectomy are determined by endoscopic and histopathological factors. Such a distinction has been challenged. The present study was designed to identify molecular parameters in colonic polyps potentially defining new sub-groups at risk.

Methods

One hundred patients were enrolled in this multicentre study. Polyps biopsies underwent formalin-free processing (PAXgene, PreAnalytiX) and targeted next generation sequencing (38 genes (QIAGEN), NextSeq 500 platform (Illumina)). Genetic and histopathological analyses were done blinded to other data.

Results

In 100 patients, 224 polyps were removed. Significant associations of genetic alterations with endoscopic or histological polyp characteristics were observed for BRAF, KRAS, TCF7L2, FBXW7 and CTNNB1 mutations. Multivariate analysis revealed that polyps ≥ 10 mm have a significant higher relative risk for harbouring oncogene mutations (relative risk 3.467 (1.742-6.933)). Adenomas and right-sided polyps are independent risk factors for CTNNB1 mutations (relative risk 18.559 (2.371-145.245) and 12.987 (1.637-100.00)).

Conclusions

Assessment of the mutational landscape of polyps can be integrated in the workflow of current colonoscopy practice. There are distinct genetic patterns related to polyp size and location. These results suffice to optimise individual risk calculation and may help to better define surveillance intervals.

Treatment monitoring of metastatic colorectal cancer by quantification and genotyping of mutated KRAS in circulating cell-free DNA

e15037

Background: Treatment of stage IV colorectal cancer (mCRC) has made substantial progress over the last years but therapy monitoring still is in its early stage. A facile, non-invasive, repeatable assessment of the mutational state of a given tumor even during treatment could constitute a desirable biomarker for therapy stratification and disease monitoring. "Liquid biopsies" analyzing circulating free and circulating tumor DNA (cfDNA/ctDNA) from patients’ blood have been proposed as a a simple, non-invasive method that could fulfil this requirement. Methods: 27 patients with histologically confirmed mCRC were enrolled into a treatment surveillance cohort. For the analysis of concordance between tumor tissue DNA and cfDNA we analyzed 40 tissue and blood pairs from therapy naïve patients regarding their KRAS mutation status. The course of cfDNA values combined with targeted genotyping of KRAS mutations were assessed during several palliative chemotherapeutic regimens. cfDNA data were correlated with clinical parameters to establish its prognostic and predictive value. Results: Baseline cfDNA levels allow to significantly differentiate mCRC from healthy controls (14.23 ± 6.33 ng/ml vs. 2.60 ± 1.59 ng/ml; p < 0.0001). cfDNA values at baseline in therapy naïve patients correlate well with tumor burden (p < 0.05) and CEA levels (p < 0.05). cfDNA values significantly increased upon disease progression during 1st (p < 0.01) and 2nd line (p < 0.05) treatment, enabling a non-invasive disease monitoring approach. Moreover, there was a significant correlation between the cfDNA levels upon treatment and progression-free survival (p < 0.05). In addition, our data show that KRAS genotyping of cfDNA under therapy is feasible (80% blood-tissue concordance) and might benefit the patient due to early detection of therapy resistance. Conclusions: Repetitive quantitative and mutational analysis of cfDNA is likely to complement current diagnostic standards in stage IV CRC over the whole continuum of treatment.

Non-invasive diagnosis and tracking of tumor evolution by targeted sequencing of circulating tumor DNA in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients

e15769

Background: Treatment of stage IV pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has made substantial progress over the last years, therapy monitoring still is at an early stage. This could be substantially supported by tools that allow to establish and monitor the molecular setup of the tumor even during treatment. In particular, non-invasive approaches are desirable. Characterization of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may help to achieve this goal. Methods: We analyzed a cohort of 20 patients with histologically confirmed metastatic PDAC (mPDAC) prior to and during palliative treatment including disease progression. ctDNA and corresponding tumor tissue were analyzed by targeted NGS and droplet digital PCR for the 7 most frequently mutated genes in PDAC ( TP53, SMAD4, CDKN2A, KRAS, APC, ATM, FBXW7). Findings were correlated with clinical and imaging data to establish its prognostic and predictive value. Results: ctDNA was analyzed at baseline prior to initiation of the respective line of treatment. Mutations in either of the genes examined were detectable in 15/20 patients (75%). Tissue-blood concordance was 80% in therapy naïve patients. 96% of mutations in ctDNA of therapy naïve patients were in KRAS and/or TP53. The combined mutated allele frequencies (CMAF) of theese 2 genes significantly decreased (p = 0.0173) during therapy and increased at progression (p = 0.0145) across all treatment lines. By sequential ctDNA analyses we detected a change in the mutational landscape compared to the respective baseline ctDNA status in 7/11 patients during 1st line, in 3/7 patients during 2nd line and 2/2 patients during 3rdline treatment. In therapy naïve patients, the decline of the CMAF during therapy significantly correlated with progression-free survival (p = 0.0013). Conclusions: Molecular genotyping of ctDNA in mPDAC patients proved to be feasible and there was a high concordance between tumor tissue and ctDNA. The molecular genotype changed significantly during treatment and changes correlated with outcome. Monitoring of ctDNA may enable to adapt therapeutic strategies to the specific molecular changes present at a certain time during treatment of mPDAC.

Surveillance after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with curative intent - a multicenter survey in Germany and review of the literature

Background Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal cancers with high risk of relapse even after curative-intended resection. There are no evidence-based recommendations for surveillance in actual guidelines. Given this situation and as a basis for prospective studies, we wanted to determine the current practice of surveillance after pancreatic cancer resection in German institutions. Methods A web-based questionnaire was sent in 2015 to 300 German institutions (hospitals, outpatient clinics, and private practices) experienced in the care of patients with PDAC. The questionnaire comprised 23 items including the respective institution, the level of care, the annual case load of pancreatic cancer surgery, the surveillance algorithms used, and the most frequently used means for surveillance as well as their evaluation by the users with respect to the effectiveness of these means. Additionally, we perform a review of the literature. Results The final analysis comprised 161 questionnaires (response rate 53.7 %). Mainly high-volume centers (82.5 % with > 300 hospital beds) participated. In 46.6 % of centers, more than 80 % of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. Between 60 - 80 % of these patients completed the recommended 6 months of adjuvant treatment, and 47 % of the patients received the whole treatment (surgery, adjuvant therapy) and surveillance in the same center. Upon completion of adjuvant treatment, 96 % of centers survey their patients, and 82 % of these centers already employ diagnostic means during the course of adjuvant chemotherapy. The most commonly used diagnostic means were taking patient history, conducting physical examination, performing laboratory tests including CA19 - 9, and imaging. Of those employed, CA19 - 9 and imaging followed by patient history were considered the most efficient to detect disease relapse by the centers. Half of the institutions perform surveillance for 5 years after surgery. Conclusion This is the first systematic analysis of self-reported surveillance strategies used in Germany after resection of PDAC with curative intent. Surveillance after resection of PDAC with curative intent is common in Germany. Alterations of CA19 - 9 levels as well as imaging and taking patient history are considered the most efficient means to detect relapse of disease by the physicians participating in our survey.

Treatment monitoring in metastatic colorectal cancer patients by quantification and KRAS genotyping of circulating cell-free DNA

Treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) has continuously improved over the last decade. However, disease monitoring remains underdeveloped and mostly dependent on imaging e.g. RECIST 1.1 criteria. The genetic landscape of individual cancers and subsequently occurring treatment-induced evolution remain neglected in current surveillance strategies. Novel biomarkers demand minimally invasive and repetitive tracking of the cancer mutagenome for therapy stratification and to make prognostic predictions. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), a routinely used tumor marker for CRC, does not meet these goals and thus prevents its use as a reliable monitoring tool. A tumor-derived fraction of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA), isolated from blood samples, may bypass the limitations of currently available biomarkers and could be a tool for noninvasive disease monitoring. Here, total cfDNA levels differentiated a cohort of metastatic CRC patients from healthy controls. Furthermore, we correlated cfDNA during chemotherapy of 27 stage IV patients with clinical parameters to establish its prognostic and predictive value. Indeed, cfDNA levels in chemotherapy naive patients correlate with the tumor burden and CEA values at diagnosis and increase upon disease progression during 1st and 2nd line treatment. Moreover, we confirm the possibility of cfDNA-based genotyping of KRAS to early detect the emergence of resistance during chemotherapy. These data indicate that repetitive quantitative and mutational analysis of cfDNA might complement current treatment standards but may have also limited value in some patients.

Detection of Hot-Spot Mutations in Circulating Cell-Free DNA From Patients With Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are the most frequent cystic pancreatic tumors. Little is known about their molecular alterations, but mutations in GNAS have been reported to promote IPMN formation. A tumor-derived fraction of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA), isolated from blood samples, contains many of the same mutations as the primary tumor, and could be a tool for noninvasive disease monitoring. We found that the total amount of cfDNA can discriminate between individuals without pancreatic lesions (controls) and patients with Fukuoka-negative branch-duct IPMN or pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, we detected GNAS mutations in cfDNA from patients with IPMN, but not in patients with serous cystadenoma or controls. Analyses of cfDNA might therefore be used in the diagnosis of patients with IPMN or in monitoring disease progression.

The occurrence of mutant KRAS clones in the blood of RAS wild type colorectal cancer patients: Impact of response or failure under anti-EGFR therapy

600

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is characterized by a high level of genetic heterogeneity. In addition, changes in the genetic profile induced by chemotherapy affect treatment results. Acquired resistance of tumors is defined as a result of clonal evolution and clonal selection under systemic chemotherapy. Repeated tumor tissue biopsies are difficult to obtain and cannot be easily used for dynamic monitoring of therapy response or failure due to marked tumor heterogeneity. Promising data for circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a tool for studying tumor evolution were recently published. Methods: In this study we analyzed ctDNA from patients with metastatic CRC during treatment with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies (cetuximab/panitumumab). By droplet digital PCR we performed genotyping of CRC tissue and tracking of clonal evolution of the most frequent KRAS mutations (G12A, G12C, G12D, G12R, G12S, G12V, G13C, G13D, Q61R, A146T and A59T) in plasma ctDNA. Results: In initial KRAS wild type tumors several mutated KRAS clones occurred in plasma under the course of anti-EGFR-therapy indicating an increasing acquired resistance to the given therapy leading to a disease progression. Some of these mutations declined upon discontinuation of anti-EGFR therapy. Conclusions: Based on these results we hypothesize that the initial state of KRAS wild type situation seems to be restored in some cases. This opens up the possibility to reinduce anti-EGFR therapy in later therapy lines.

DocOx (AIO-PK0106): a phase II trial of docetaxel and oxaliplatin as a second line systemic therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Background

The current study was conducted to examine the activity of a docetaxel/oxaliplatin (DocOx) combination as second line treatment for advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (Trial registration: NCT00690300. Registered June 2, 2008)

Methods

DocOx is a prospective, multi-center, single arm, phase II trial using docetaxel (75 mg/m², 60 min, d 1) and oxaliplatin (80 mg/m², 120 min, d 2) in 21-day cycles. The treatment period was scheduled for up to 8 cycles. Primary endpoint was tumor response according to RECIST 1.0. Secondary endpoints were progression free survival, overall survival, safety/toxicity, quality of life and clinical benefit.

Results

Data represent the intention to treat analysis of 44 patients with chemorefractory pancreatic cancer enrolled between 2008 and 2012 at five institutions in Germany. The primary endpoint of tumor response was achieved in 15.9 % of the patients (7 partial remissions, no complete remission), with a disease control rate of 48 % after the first two treatment cycles. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 1.82 months (CI 95 % 1.5–3.96 months) and median overall survival (OS) was 10.1 months (CI 95 % 5.1–14.1 months).

Conclusions

This single-arm trial demonstrates that the combination of docetaxel and oxaliplatin yields promising results for the treatment of advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients. Selected patients had particular benefit from this treatment as indicated by long PFS and OS times. Even after 8 cycles of treatment with DocOx a partial response was observed in 2 patients and stable disease was observed in another 6 patients. The data obtained with the DocOx protocol compare well with other second line protocols such as OFF (oxaliplatin, 5-FU, leucovorin). The DocOx regimen could be an interesting option for patients who received gemcitabine as first line treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2052-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

DocOx (AIO-PK0106): A phase II trial with docetaxel and oxaliplatin as a second-line systemic therapy for patients with advanced and/or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas—Final results

352

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma still remains a major cause of cancer related deaths in the western world. The current study was conducted to confirm the activity and feasibility of docetaxel/ oxaliplatin combination in second line treatment of advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Methods: Prospective single arm, non-randomized, multi-center, Simon’s two stage phase II trial using docetaxel (75 mg/m2, 60 min, d 1) and oxaliplatin (80 mg/m2, 120 min, d 2) in 21-day cycles. Duration of the trial was scheduled up two 8 cycles. Primary endpoint was tumor response according to RECIST 1.0. Secondary endpoints were progression free survival, overall survival, safety/toxicity, quality of life and clinical benefit. Results: Data represents the intention to treat analysis of 44 patients included between 2008 and 2012. The majority of patients received a gemcitabine based first-line chemotherapy (95.5%). The primary endpoint of tumor response was achieved in 15.9% (7 partial remissions, no complete remission), with a disease control rate of 48% after the first two treatment cycles. Median progression free survival was 7 weeks (CI 6-15.9 weeks) and overall survival 40 weeks (CI 20.4-56.4 weeks). No unexpected adverse events occured. The recorded AEs were mainly hematologic (neutropenia grade 3/4 63.6%, febrile neutropenia 4.6%), gastrointestinal (29.6% grade 3/4 AEs) and infectious (18.2% grade 3/4 AEs). Conclusions: In this single-arm second line trial for the treatment of advanced PDAC, the combination of docetaxel and oxaliplatin shows promising results comparable with other second line protocols such as OFF (oxaliplatin, 5-FU, leucovorin) or liposomal irinotecan (MM-398) plus 5-FU/leucovorin (NAPOLI 1-trial). Some patients seem to benefit particularly as indicated by long periods of treatment in this setting. Even after 8 cycles of treatment with DocOx, partial response was observed in 2 patients and stable disease in another 6 patients corresponding to a disease control rate of 18%. The toxicity profile was quite tolerable and comparable to other second line studies. Clinical trial information: NCT00690300.

Neonax (AIO-PAK-0313): Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant or only adjuvant nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for resectable pancreatic cancer: A phase II study of the AIO Pancreatic Cancer Group

TPS497

Background: Resectable pancreatic cancer still has an unfavourable prognosis. Neoadjuvant or perioperative therapies might improve the prognosis of these patients. Recently, two phase III trials demonstrated for the first time, a substantial improvement in overall response, PFS and OS in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer compared to standard gemcitabine (FOLFIRINOX and nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine). The combination of nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine has a more favourable toxicity profile compared to the FOLFIRINOX protocol and appears applicable in a perioperative setting. Methods: NEONAX is a study for patients (to be enrolled: n=166) with resectable ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas ≤ T3 in two arms: Arm A (perioperative arm): 2 cycles nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2)/gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2, d1, 8 and 15 of an 28 day-cycle) - tumor surgery - 4 cycles nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine, Arm B (adjuvant only arm): tumor surgery - 6 cycles nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine. NEONAX is an interventional, prospective, randomized, controlled, open label, two sided phase II study with an unconnected analysis of the results in both experimental arms against a fixed survival probability (38% at 18 month with adjuvant gemcitabine). The randomization (1:1) is eminent to achieve two comparable patient groups. Primary objective is DFS at 18 months after randomization. Key secondary objectives are 3-year OS and DFS, progression during neoadjuvant therapy and QoL. In the perioperative group tumor tissue will be collected prior to and post-surgery and subjected to microdissection and exome sequencing of tumor tissue. Tumor regression will be assessed both in the perioperative and the adjuvant group, respectively. In addition, circulating tumor-DNA will be analyzed in patients with the best and the worst responses to the neoadjuvant treatment. Start of trial will be in IV/2014 in 20 high-volume centers for pancreatic surgery in Germany. Clinical trial information: NCT02047513. Clinical trial information: NCT02047513.

[Colon Polypectomy - And Then?]

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most frequent gastrointestinal tumour. Most CRC appear to arise from adenomas of the colon in a period of 10 or 15 years. The ultimately progression of benign adenomas to malignant CRC is known as the adenoma-carcinoma sequence. In addition, the description of the "serrated pathway" has shifted the focus of interest also towards to sessile serrated adenomas and traditional serrated adenomas in the development of CRC. It has been proven that the screening colonoscopy might prevent CRC by early detection of adenomatous polyps as precursors for colorectal cancer and polypectomy. Thus, disease-associated mortality of CRC could be reduced. Colonoscopy, the gold standard in CRC diagnosis, is recommended to men and women from the age of 55. On the one hand, there are requirements to the endoscopists. On the other hand there are also essential requirements to pathologists' findings. After polypectomy a risk stratification for aftercare based on endoscopic and histological findings is necessary. Endoscopic follow-up of high-risk patients (≥ 3 tubular adenomas, ≥ 1 adenoma ≥ 1 cm, tubulovillous or villous adenoma, ≥ 1 adenoma with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, ≥ 10 adenoma no matter what size or histological findings) should be done sooner (< 3 years). In contrast, colonoscopy in low-risk patients (1 or 2 [tubular] adenomas, size < 1 cm) should be performed later rather than sooner (> 5 years). Colonoscopic surveys under 12 months should be done only in exceptional and very serious situations. Pharmaceutical chemoprevention of adenomas or CRC are still part of clinical trails. More data are necessary.

DOCOX: A phase II trial with docetaxel and oxaliplatin as a second-line systemic therapy for patients with advanced and/or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

4034

Background: In Europe and the USA, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the fifth most common cause of cancer-related death. For patients with metastatic disease, palliative cytostatic systemic treatment is the only option. There is no established standard for 2nd-line treatment. Fluoropyrimidines either alone or in combination with Oxaliplatin or other chemotherapeutic agents are increasingly used. There are interesting data regarding the combination of Gemcitabine with Oxaliplatin or Docetaxel with respect to progression free survival (PFS) and tumor response in 1st-line. For the first time, the DocOx-trial investigates the combination of Oxaliplatin with Docetaxel as 2nd-line treatment after progression under palliative first-line systemic treatment with Gemcitabine. Methods: Prospective, single arm, non-randomized, multicenter, Simon´s two stage phase II trial using Docetaxel (75 mg/m2, 60 min, d 1) plus Oxaliplatin (80 mg/m2, 120 min, d 2, qd 22). Duration of the trial is scheduled up to 8 cycles. Primary endpoint: tumor response (RR) according to RECIST 1.0. Secondary endpoints: PFS, OS, safety/toxicity, QoL/clinical benefit. Results: Here we present the data on response rate (RR), median progression free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) as of February 4th, 2013. Data represents the Intention to treat-analysis of the 44 patients included between 2009 and 2012. 5 patients did not obtain any treatment. RR was 16% (7 partial remissions, no complete remission) with a disease control rate (DCR) of 48% after the first two treatment cycles. Median PFS was 7 weeks ( 95%-CI: 6-16 w.) and median OS after start of 2nd-line therapy was 36 weeks ( 95%-CI: 19-55 w.). Conclusions: In this single-arm 2nd-line trial for the treatment of PDAC, the combination of Doxcetaxel and Oxaliplatin shows very promising results compared to other 2nd-line-protocols such as OFF. Some patients seem to benefit particularly as indicated by long periods of treatment in this setting. Even after 8 cycles of treatment with DocOx, partial response was observed in 2 patients and stable disease in another 6 patients corresponding a disease control rate of 18%. Clinical trial information: NCT00690300.