A Comparative Analysis of Effect of HIV Infection on Outcomes of Cervical Cancer Treated with Radiotherapy

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

There is paucity of data on management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive cervical cancer and its clinical outcomes in Indian women. The primary objective of this study was to compare disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients receiving radiotherapy (RT) for cervical cancer. The secondary endpoints were toxicity and various factors affecting DFS and OS.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients diagnosed with cervical cancer on histopathology and treated with RT with or without concomitant chemotherapy (CT) at an institution between 2015 and 2020 were included in this retrospective analysis. On the basis of HIV serology test, 70 patients were included in each arm, Arm A had HIV-negative patients and Arm B had HIV-positive patients. In both the arms, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in adjuvant or radical setting was given with a total dose of 46-50 Gy to whole pelvis and iliac nodes; 2 Gy/fraction daily as 5 fractions/week by conventional four-field box technique or conformal 3-dimensional radiotherapy (3DCRT) or Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Concurrent cisplatin was administered as weekly 40mg/m2 to patients with ECOG< = 2, creatinine clearance >40mL/min in radical and adjuvant patients as indicated. CD4 counts ≥200 cells/mm3 was a prerequisite for concurrent cisplatin in Arm B. Intracavitary or interstitial brachytherapy was delivered as indicated. Statistical analysis was done using statistical software. Kaplan-Meier method used for all survival analysis. Log rank test was used to calculate statistical significance for various prognostic factors followed by Cox regression test for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Median age was 46.5 years (range: 30-76). In Arm A, 62 patients (88.57%) and 5 patients (7.14%) received radical and adjuvant RT. In Arm B 61 patients (87.14%) and 2 patients (2.85%) were given radical and adjuvant RT. 66 patients (94.28%) in Arm A and 52 patients (74.28%) in Arm B received concurrent cisplatin. At a median follow up of 33.8 months (range: 1.2 to 85.4), 2-year DFS was 88.9% for Arm-A and 86.5% for Arm-B (p = 0.134) and 2-year OS was 91.4% and 82.9% for Arm-A and Arm-B (p = 0.001), respectively. Grade III/IV skin toxicity was seen in and 4 patients (5.71%) in Arm A and 12 patients (17.14%) in Arm B (p = 0.34). Grade III/IV gastrointestinal toxicity was seen in 2(2.85%) patients and 4(5.7%) patients in Arm A and Arm B respectively (p = 0.40). 14(20%) patients in Arm A and 27(38.5%) patients in Arm B had Grade III/IV hematologic toxicity (p = 0.016). On multivariate analysis, anemia (Hb≤12 gm/dl) and OTT ≥56 days were associated with unfavorable DFS (p = 0.03 and p = 0.001) and OS (p = 0.04 and p = 0.01) in Arm B.

CONCLUSION

In view of comparable DFS outcomes in both the arms, HIV-positive cervical cancer patients can be managed with the standard treatment protocol as HIV-negative patients. HIV-positive patients are more likely to experience poorer DFS and OS. However, results need to be validated on prospective study.

Correlation of Dose Volume Parameters with Dysphagia and Pharyngeal Constrictor Muscle Thickness in Dysphagia Optimized IMRT

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Reduced radiation dose to the pharyngeal constrictor muscles (PCM) using dysphagia optimized intensity-modulated RT (DO-IMRT) is associated with improved swallowing outcomes in oropharyngeal cancers (OPCs). Purpose was to evaluate the relationship between dose of radiation delivered and acute dysphagia in patients with OPC treated with IMRT, after delineation of PCM.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Twenty-five patients with newly diagnosed OPC who underwent definitive IMRT with concurrent cisplatin were included in the study. PCM mean dose < 50 Gy was used as the dose constraint. Target volume was divided into high, intermediate and low risk areas receiving doses in the range of 60-66 Gy, 54-58 Gy, 51-56 Gy in 30-33 fractions over 6-6.5 weeks, respectively. PCM dose-volume parameters were collected and logistic regression was used to analyze these data relative to percent weight loss during RT and duration of feeding tube use. Thickness of constrictor muscle in pre-treatment and 3 months post-therapy CT scan were assessed. Weekly assessment of dysphagia was based on RTOG toxicity gradings. Aim of the study was to evaluate the correlation between dysphagia grades with dose-volume parameters and PCM thickness.

RESULTS

Median age was 55.0 years (mean 54.3) with 24 males and stage II:III-16:9 patients. Dmean to PCM was 49.86 Gy (range 48.22 -57.63) with median Dmax of 70.24 Gy. For patients with dysphagia (grade ≥1), V50 ranged from 48.2-57.23%, while in those with no dysphagia, it ranged from 47.92-52.18 % (Mean 51.36%). Nine patients needed feeding tube after RT end. Median feeding tube duration was 64 days. The correlation between Dmean ≥ 50 Gy and dysphagia at 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 6th month was found statistically significant (p < 0.01). Table 1 shows the Pearson correlation and P-value of the dosimetric parameters with dysphagia. The correlation of V50 was found statistically significant with grade of dysphagia at 3rd and 6th month post-treatment (p<0.001). The mean thickness range and median thickness of constrictors before and 3 months after treatment were 1.8-3.2 mm, 2.4 mm, and 2.8-6.2 mm,4.1 mm, respectively. The increase in thickness of constrictor muscle correlated significantly (p<0.05) with dysphagia grades and also with V50, V60 and Dmean (p<0.001) but no statistical significance was seen with Dmax (p = 0.232). With a median follow-up of 18 months (range 7-24), 1-year actuarial local control was 92%.

CONCLUSION

DO-IMRT may prove beneficial in the OPC by preventing dysphagia and aspiration post therapy and hence improving the quality of life of patients. Dmean ≥ 50Gy, V50 > 51.4% and V60 > 35.5% are the parameters correlating significantly with dysphagia (p<0.001) and change in mean thickness of PCM (p<0.001).

The effects of the DASH dietary pattern on clinical outcomes and quality of life in adults with uncontrolled asthma: Design and methods of the ALOHA Trial

BACKGROUND

Poor diet quality is an important risk factor for increased asthma prevalence and poor asthma control. To address the question of whether adults with asthma can benefit from following a healthy diet, this trial will test the efficacy and mechanisms of action of a behavioral intervention promoting the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) dietary pattern with sodium reduction among patients with uncontrolled asthma.

METHODS

In this 2-arm randomized clinical trial, 320 racially/ethnically and socioeconomically diverse adults with uncontrolled asthma on standard controller therapy will be randomized to either a control or an intervention group and assessed at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months. Control and intervention participants will receive education on lung health, asthma, and other general health topics; additionally, the intervention group will receive DASH behavioral counseling over 12 months. The primary hypothesis is that the DASH behavioral intervention, compared with the education-only control, will lead to significantly more participants with minimum clinically important improvement (responders) in asthma-specific quality of life at 12 months. Secondary hypotheses will test the intervention effects on other asthma (e.g., asthma control, lung function) and non-asthma outcomes (e.g., quality of life). Additionally, therapeutic (e.g., short chain fatty acids, cytokines) and nutritional biomarkers (e.g., dietary inflammatory index, carotenoids) will be assessed to understand the mechanisms of the intervention effect.

CONCLUSION

This trial can substantially advance asthma care by providing rigorous evidence on the benefits of a behavioral dietary intervention and mechanistic insights into the role of diet quality in asthma.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov #: NCT05251402.

Phase Ib Study of Telisotuzumab Vedotin in Combination With Erlotinib in Patients With c-Met Protein-Expressing Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Overexpression of c-Met protein and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations can co-occur in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), providing strong rationale for dual targeting. Telisotuzumab vedotin (Teliso-V), a first-in-class antibody-drug conjugate targeting c-Met, has shown a tolerable safety profile and antitumor activity as monotherapy. Herein, we report the results of a phase Ib study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02099058) evaluating Teliso-V plus erlotinib, an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), in patients with c-Met-positive (+) NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study evaluated Teliso-V (2.7 mg/kg once every 21 days) plus erlotinib (150 mg once daily) in adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with c-Met+ NSCLC. Later enrollment required presence of an EGFR-activating mutation (EGFR-M+) and progression on a prior EGFR TKI. End points included safety, pharmacokinetics, objective response rate (ORR), and progression-free survival (PFS). The efficacy-evaluable population consisted of c-Met+ patients (confirmed histology [H]-score ≥ 150) who had at least one postbaseline scan; c-Met+ patients with H-scores ≥ 225 were classified as c-Met high.

RESULTS

As of January 2020, 42 patients were enrolled (N = 36 efficacy-evaluable). Neuropathies were the most common any-grade adverse events reported, with 24 of 42 patients (57%) experiencing at least one event. The pharmacokinetic profile of Teliso-V plus erlotinib was similar to Teliso-V monotherapy. Median PFS for all efficacy-evaluable patients was 5.9 months (95% CI, 2.8 to not reached). ORR for EGFR-M+ patients (n = 28) was 32.1%. Of EGFR-M+ patients, those who were c-Met high (n = 15) had an ORR of 52.6%. Median PFS was 6.8 months for non-T790M+ and for those whose T790M status was unknown, versus 3.7 months for T790M+.

CONCLUSION

Teliso-V plus erlotinib showed encouraging antitumor activity and acceptable toxicity in EGFR TKI-pretreated patients with EGFR-M+, c-Met+ NSCLC.

Analyzing the impact of close margins and extra-resection margins on failure rates in postoperative oral cavity cancers

BACKGROUND

Postoperative oral cancers with close margins belong to medium- to high-risk category for local failure. During re-surgery for close margins, there is sufficient doubt as to whether the re-excised tissue is from the same region as the close margin. Therefore, we planned a retrospective review of these cases of close margins that were re-excised with extra-resection margins (ERMs).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Details of 2011 oral cavity patients resected at our hospital were retrieved. Cases with close margins were segregated and the status of ERMs was noted. The postoperative histopathological details, radiotherapy details, and failure patterns in all these cases were documented. The primary objective of the study was to assess the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in cases with ERMs. The secondary objective was to assess the local and regional control rates and variation with the number and status of close and ERMs. OS, DFS, and local failure rates were defined from the date of registration. Statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS statistical software package. All survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test was used to test the statistical significance. A P-value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Sixty-four cases with a median age of 47 years (range: 29-76) were considered for the final analysis. The median follow-up was 40 months (range: 9.5-56.5). The 2-year OS and DFS rates were 91.5% and 88.5%, respectively. The crude local and regional failure rates were 10.9% and 3.1%, respectively. The 3-year locoregional control rate was 90.2%. The 2-year locoregional control rate for one close margin was significantly better as compared to more than one close margin (P = 0.049). No difference in survival and failure rates was found between the number of ERMs resected (one vs. two) and ≤ vs. > 3 mm close margin status. Two patients developed bone metastases.

CONCLUSION

The survival rates and locoregional control rates did not differ much between the groups that had one or more ERMs. However, the locoregional control rates were better in cases with one close margin as compared to those with more than one close margin. A larger study with longer follow-up is needed to detect statistically significant differences in outcomes and identify the factors that portend poor prognosis in these cases with close margins and ERMs.

Direct Measurement of Resonances in ^{7}Be(α,γ)^{11}C Relevant to νp-Process Nucleosynthesis

We have performed the first direct measurement of two resonances of the ^{7}Be(α,γ)^{11}C reaction with unknown strengths using an intense radioactive ^{7}Be beam and the DRAGON recoil separator. We report on the first measurement of the 1155 and 1110 keV resonance strengths of 1.73±0.25(stat)±0.40(syst)  eV and 125_{-25}^{+27}(stat)±15(syst)  meV, respectively. The present results have reduced the uncertainty in the ^{7}Be(α,γ)^{11}C reaction rate to ∼9.4%-10.7% over T=1.5-3  GK, which is relevant for nucleosynthesis in the neutrino-driven outflows of core-collapse supernovae (νp process). We find no effect of the new, constrained reaction rate on νp-process nucleosynthesis.

Phase 1/1b study of telisotuzumab vedotin (Teliso-V) + osimertinib (Osi), after failure on prior Osi, in patients with advanced, c-Met overexpressing, EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

9013

Background: Osi (third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor) is a standard frontline treatment (Tx) for advanced/metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC. However, tumors invariably progress after an initial response, with c-Met protein overexpression (OE) often associated with acquired resistance. Second- and third-line Tx options are limited to chemotherapy-based regimens with limited efficacy and significant toxicities. Teliso-V (ABBV-399), an anti–c-Met antibody-drug conjugate, delivers a cytotoxic payload (monomethyl auristatin E) into c-Met OE tumor cells. In a phase 1/1b study (NCT02099058) in patients (pts) with c-Met OE NSCLC, Teliso-V alone or in combination with erlotinib demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and antitumor activity. Interim safety and efficacy data from the Teliso-V + Osi cohort (arm E) of this trial are presented. Methods: Pts (≥18 yr) with metastatic EGFR-mutated, c-Met OE (by central immunohistochemistry) NSCLC who had progressed on a prior Osi regimen were eligible. Pts received Teliso-V (IV Q2W) + Osi (oral; 80 mg QD). Teliso-V was evaluated at 1.6 mg/kg and, after review of safety data, escalated to 1.9 mg/kg (safety evaluation). An expansion cohort was opened at 1.9 mg/kg for pts who had received ≤2 prior lines of systemic therapy. Pharmacokinetics (PK) were assessed throughout the study. Pts received study Tx until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or for up to 24 months. Results: As of 20 Dec 2021, 25 pts received Teliso-V (1.6 mg/kg, n = 7; 1.9 mg/kg, n = 18) + Osi. Median age was 60.0 yr; 14 (58%) pts were on prior Tx with Osi for > 12 mo. No dose-limiting toxicities (grade [Gr] ≥3 non-hematologic or Gr 4 hematologic Tx-related adverse events [AEs]) were reported during the safety lead-in or evaluation phases. All-Gr AEs considered possibly related to Teliso-V occurred in 22/25 (88%) pts: the most common (≥20%) were peripheral sensory neuropathy (36%), nausea, and peripheral edema (20% each); Gr ≥3 AEs (> 5%) were anemia (12%) and peripheral motor neuropathy (8%). No Gr 5 events related to Tx were reported. PK of Teliso-V + Osi was similar to single-agent Teliso-V. Efficacy data (19/25 pts) are in the table. The overall objective response rate (ORR) was 58% (67% at 1.9 mg/kg). Conclusions: Teliso-V + Osi is well tolerated with an ORR of 58% (67% at 1.9 mg/kg) in pts with c-Met OE NSCLC who progressed on prior Osi. Clinical trial information: NCT02099058. [Table: see text]

A Phase 1b Study of Telisotuzumab Vedotin in Combination With Nivolumab in Patients With NSCLC

Introduction

Telisotuzumab vedotin (Teliso-V) is an anti-c-Met-directed antibody-drug conjugate that has exhibited antitumor activity as monotherapy in NSCLC. Its potential activity combined with programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitors has not been previously evaluated.

Methods

In a phase 1b study (NCT02099058), adult patients (≥18 y) with advanced NSCLC received combination therapy with Teliso-V (1.6, 1.9, or 2.2 mg/kg, every 2 wk) plus nivolumab (3 mg/kg, 240 mg, or per locally approved label). The primary objective was to assess safety and tolerability; secondary objectives included the evaluation of antitumor activity.

Results

As of January 2020, a total of 37 patients received treatment with Teliso-V (safety population) in combination with nivolumab; 27 patients (efficacy population) were c-Met immunohistochemistry-positive. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status was evaluated in the efficacy population (PD-L1-positive [PD-L1+]: n = 15; PD-L1-negative [PD-L1-]: n = 9; PD-L1-unknown: n = 3). The median age was 67 years and 74% (20 of 27) of patients were naive to immune checkpoint inhibitors. The most common any-grade treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (27%) and peripheral sensory neuropathy (19%). The pharmacokinetic profile of Teliso-V plus nivolumab was similar to Teliso-V monotherapy. The objective response rate was 7.4%, with two patients (PD-L1+, c-Met immunohistochemistry H-score 190, n = 1; PD-L1-, c-Met H-score 290, n = 1) having a confirmed partial response. Overall median progression-free survival was 7.2 months (PD-L1+: 7.2 mo; PD-L1-: 4.5 mo; PD-L1-unknown: not reached).

Conclusions

Combination therapy with Teliso-V plus nivolumab was well tolerated in patients with c-Met+ NSCLC with limited antitumor activity.

Phase I Study of 2- or 3-Week Dosing of Telisotuzumab Vedotin, an Antibody-Drug Conjugate Targeting c-Met, Monotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Telisotuzumab vedotin (Teliso-V) is an anti-c-Met-directed antibody-drug conjugate. Here, we present safety and efficacy data from a phase I/Ib study of Teliso-V monotherapy evaluated in once every 2 weeks/once every 3 weeks schedules in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

During dose escalation, patients received Teliso-V monotherapy intravenously once every 3 weeks (0.15-3.3 mg/kg) or once every 2 weeks (1.6-2.2 mg/kg). The dose-expansion phase enrolled patients with NSCLC and c-Met H-score ≥150 (c-Met+) or MET amplification/exon 14 skipping mutations. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy were assessed. Herein, the analysis of patients receiving ≥1.6 mg/kg once every 2 weeks or ≥2.4 mg/kg once every 3 weeks Teliso-V is reported.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients with NSCLC were enrolled and received ≥1.6 mg/kg Teliso-V once every 2 weeks (n = 28) or ≥2.4 mg/kg Teliso-V once every 3 weeks (n = 24). The most common adverse events were fatigue (54%), peripheral neuropathy (42%), and nausea (38%). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed for Teliso-V once every 2 weeks and once every 3 weeks up to 2.2 and 2.7 mg/kg, respectively. The recommended phase II dose was established at 1.9 mg/kg once every 2 weeks and 2.7 mg/kg once every 3 weeks on the basis of overall safety and pharmacokinetics. Forty of 52 patients were c-Met+ (33 nonsquamous, 6 squamous, 1 mixed histology) and were included in the efficacy-evaluable population. Of those, 9 (23%) had objective responses with median duration of response of 8.7 months; median progression-free survival was 5.2 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Teliso-V monotherapy was tolerated and showed antitumor activity in c-Met+ NSCLC. On the basis of overall safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy outcomes, 1.9 mg/kg Teliso-V once every 2 weeks and 2.7 mg/kg once every 3 weeks schedules were selected for further clinical development.

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of budigalimab with rovalpituzumab tesirine in patients with small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Agents targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) have been approved as monotherapy for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In preclinical models, the combined targeting of PD-1 and delta-like protein 3 resulted in enhanced antitumor activity. Herein, we report results from the expansion arm of study NCT03000257 evaluating the combination of the anti-PD-1 antibody budigalimab and the targeted antibody-drug conjugate rovalpituzumab tesirine (Rova-T) in patients with previously treated SCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This expansion arm of a multicenter, open-label, multi-arm, first-in-human phase 1 clinical trial enrolled adult patients with progressive SCLC. The primary objective was to assess safety and tolerability. Patients received budigalimab 375 mg via intravenous infusion every 3 weeks, and Rova-T was administered as a dose of 0.3 mg/kg intravenously, on day 1 of the first and third 3-week cycle.

RESULTS

As of October 2019, 31 patients with SCLC were enrolled and treated with budigalimab plus Rova-T. The combination was tolerated, with the most common treatment-emergent adverse events (in >30%) being pleural effusion, fatigue, and cough. The overall response rate was 24.1%, with one confirmed complete response and six confirmed partial responses. The overall response rate in patients with high delta-like protein 3 expression was similar (21.1%). The median progression-free survival was 3.48 months.

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy with budigalimab and Rova-T had promising efficacy and appeared to be tolerated in patients with SCLC. Although Rova-T development has been discontinued, development of budigalimab combined with other anticancer agents is ongoing.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03000257 Statement on originality of the work The manuscript represents original work and has not been submitted for publication elsewhere nor previously published. Statement of prior presentation Data from this study were previously presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress 2019.

Phase 1 first-in-human study of ABBV-184 monotherapy in adult patients with previously treated acute myeloid leukemia or non-small cell lung cancer

TPS2674

Background: Survivin, a member of the inhibitor of apoptosis protein family, is an attractive therapeutic target in cancer, due to its broad expression in solid tumors and hematologic malignancies but limited expression in normal tissues. Elevated survivin expression is associated with an increased invasive phenotype and worse clinical outcomes. ABBV-184 is a first-in-class T-cell receptor (TCR)/anti-cluster of differentiation 3 (CD3) bispecific molecule. It is composed of a soluble TCR that binds to a survivin-derived peptide bound to the class I MHC allele HLA-A2:01 expressed on tumor cells and to the CD3 receptor on T cells. Preclinical data have demonstrated that treatment with ABBV-184 results in T-cell activation, proliferation, and redirected cytotoxicity of HLA-A2:01–positive target cell lines. This first-in-human trial evaluates ABBV-184 monotherapy in patients with previously treated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Patients (≥18 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2, HLA-A2:01 restricted genotype) with relapsed or refractory AML or NSCLC are currently enrolling in this phase 1 multicenter, open-label trial (NCT04272203), which includes parallel dose-escalation and dose-expansion phases for both diseases. Primary objectives are to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of ABBV-184 (dose escalation) and to assess its preliminary efficacy (dose expansion). Secondary objectives include safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity assessments (dose escalation and dose expansion) and duration of response (dose expansion). Patients will receive intravenous infusion of ABBV-184 once weekly. Dose escalation of ABBV-184 is guided by a Bayesian optimal interval design and the RP2D will be determined on the basis of clinical safety, PK, and pharmacodynamic data. For patients with AML, disease assessment is performed according to modified European LeukemiaNet-International Working Group criteria. For patients with NSCLC, response will be assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 and immune RECIST. Treatment can continue until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Biomarker assessments will include longitudinal profiling of peripheral blood immune cells and cytokines, analysis of HLA-A2 and survivin levels on AML bone marrow blasts and NSCLC tumor biopsies, and retrospective correlations of biomarker data with antitumor activity. Enrollment initiated in Sep 2020, with 7 patients enrolled as of Jan 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT04272203.

Phase 1 study of telisotuzumab vedotin in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors

Telisotuzumab vedotin (formerly ABBV‐399) is an antibody‐drug conjugate targeting c‐Met–overexpressing tumor cells, irrespective of MET gene amplification status. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of telisotuzumab vedotin were evaluated outside of Japan. This phase 1 open‐label study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor activity of telisotuzumab vedotin in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Telisotuzumab vedotin was administered intravenously at either 2.4 mg/kg (n = 3) or 2.7 mg/kg (n = 6) every 3 weeks, following a 3 + 3 design. Maximum tolerated dose was not reached on the basis of the study design; no dose‐limiting toxicity events were observed. The most common treatment‐emergent adverse events related to telisotuzumab vedotin were peripheral sensory neuropathy (44%), and nausea, decreased appetite, and decreased white blood cell count (33% each). Most frequent grade ≥3 treatment‐emergent adverse events, irrespective of relationship to telisotuzumab vedotin, were decreased neutrophil count and hypoalbuminemia, reported in two patients (22%) each. Systemic exposure of telisotuzumab vedotin at both dose levels was approximately dose proportional. Pharmacokinetic profile in Japanese patients was similar to that previously reported in non‐Japanese patients. Two (22%) patients achieved a partial response, six (67%) had stable disease, one (11%) had progressive disease. Overall disease control rate was 89% (eight of nine patients; 95% confidence interval: 51.8%–99.7%]). Median progression‐free survival was 7.1 months (95% confidence interval: 1.2–10.4). In conclusion, telisotuzumab vedotin demonstrated a manageable safety profile, with antitumor activity in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors; the recommended phase 2 dose was confirmed as 2.7 mg/kg every 3 weeks.

ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT03311477.

Model Informed Dosing Regimen and Phase I Results of the Anti-PD-1 Antibody Budigalimab (ABBV-181)

Budigalimab is a humanized, recombinant, Fc mutated IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting programmed cell death 1 (PD‐1) receptor, currently in phase I clinical trials. The safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PKs), pharmacodynamics (PDs), and budigalimab dose selection from monotherapy dose escalation and multihistology expansion cohorts were evaluated in patients with previously treated advanced solid tumors who received budigalimab at 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks (Q2W) in dose escalation, including Japanese patients that received 3 and 10 mg/kg Q2W. PK modeling and PK/PD assessments informed the dosing regimen in expansion phase using data from body‐weight‐based dosing in the escalation phase, based on which patients in the multihistology expansion cohort received flat doses of 250 mg Q2W or 500 mg every four weeks (Q4W). Immune‐related adverse events (AEs) were reported in 11 of 59 patients (18.6%), of which 1 of 59 (1.7%) was considered grade ≥ 3 and the safety profile of budigalimab was consistent with other PD‐1 targeting agents. No treatment‐related grade 5 AEs were reported. Four responses per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 were reported in the dose escalation cohort and none in the multihistology expansion cohort. PK of budigalimab was approximately dose proportional and sustained > 99% peripheral PD‐1 receptor saturation was observed by 2 hours postdosing, across doses. PK/PD and safety profiles were comparable between Japanese and Western patients, and exposure‐safety analyses did not indicate any trends. Observed PK and PD‐1 receptor saturation were consistent with model predictions for flat doses and less frequent regimens, validating the early application of PK modeling and PK/PD assessments to inform the recommended dose and regimen, following dose escalation.

Assessment of Clinical Drug-Drug Interactions of Elagolix, a Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor Antagonist

Elagolix is an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist indicated for the management of endometriosis-associated pain and in combination with estradiol/norethindrone acetate indicated for the management of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine leiomyomas (fibroids) in premenopausal women. Elagolix coadministered with estradiol/norethindrone acetate is in late-stage development for the management of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids. Based on the in vitro profile of elagolix metabolism and disposition, 9 drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies evaluating the victim and perpetrator characteristics of elagolix were conducted in 144 healthy volunteers. As a victim of cytochrome P450 (CYPs) and transporter-mediated DDIs, elagolix area under the curve (AUC) increased by ∼2-fold following coadministration with ketoconazole and by ∼5- and ∼2-fold with single and multiple doses of rifampin, respectively. As a perpetrator, elagolix decreased midazolam AUC (90% confidence interval) by 54% (50%-59%) and increased digoxin AUC by 32% (23%-41%). Elagolix decreased rosuvastatin AUC by 40% (29%-50%). No clinically significant changes in exposure on coadministration with sertraline or fluconazole occurred. A elagolix 150-mg once-daily regimen should be limited to 6 months with strong CYP3A inhibitors and rifampin because of the potential increase in bone mineral density loss, as described in the drug label. A 200-mg twice-daily regimen is recommended for no more than 1 month with strong CYP3A inhibitors and not recommended with rifampin. Elagolix is contraindicated with strong organic anion transporter polypeptide B1 inhibitors (eg, cyclosporine and gemfibrozil). Consider increasing the doses of midazolam and rosuvastatin when coadministered with elagolix, and individualize therapy based on patient response. Clinical monitoring is recommended for P-glycoprotein substrates with a narrow therapeutic window (eg, digoxin). Dose adjustments are not required for sertraline, fluconazole, bupropion (or any CYP2B6 substrate), or elagolix when coadministered.

Predictors and Barriers to Condom Use in the African Cohort Study

Consistent condom use is an inexpensive and efficacious HIV prevention strategy. Understanding factors associated with condom use and barriers to use can inform strategies to increase condom uptake. The ongoing African Cohort Study prospectively enrolls adults at 12 clinical sites in Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania, and Nigeria. At enrollment, participants are asked about condom use at last sex with a regular partner. Robust Poisson regression models were used to evaluate predictors of self-reported condom use. Participants who reported not using condoms were asked to provide reasons. From January 2013 to September 2019, 2482 participants reported having at least one regular sexual partner in the preceding 6 months. Of those, 1577 (63.5%) reported using a condom at last sex. Condom use was more common among older participants, males, HIV-infected participants, and those with an HIV-infected partner. Married participants, those with a partner of unknown HIV status, and those reporting alcohol use were less likely to report condom use at last sex. Condom use at last sex also varied significantly by clinical site. Partner disapproval or refusal to use a condom was a consistent driver of disparities in condom use among participants who were HIV infected, female, and aged 18-24 years. Effective HIV prevention programs should integrate condom education with the tools necessary to negotiate condom use with regular partners.

Zileuton use and phenotypic features in asthma

Zileuton, a 5-lipoxygenase (5LPO) inhibitor exerts a broad influence in the arachidonic acid (AA) pathway by blocking upstream molecules that otherwise would lead to production of an array of inflammatory leukotrienes (LT) A4-E4. Hence, it has the potential to be a drug suitable to treat complicated asthmatics. Studies have shown modest response rates for zileuton in asthmatics.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to study our hypothesis that response to zileuton varies across specific asthmatic phenotypes.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 129 patients with asthma that were prescribed zileuton at the University of Pittsburgh's Comprehensive Lung Clinic. A total of 75 patients from the above population had requisite lung function data and zileuton usage that would help assess a drug response effect. A zileuton responder was defined as having at least or greater than 5% annualized increase in post-bronchodilator FEV1% from baseline. Using a multivariate logistic regression analysis, we determined the association between responder status and the underlying phenotypic characteristics.

RESULTS

Using generalized estimating equations (GEE) analysis of 331 individual lung function test data-points as well as logistic regression analysis for predictors of 5% or more annualized increase in FEV1%, 21 of 75 patients (28%) met criteria for having a differential response to zileuton. Severe asthma was associated less often with responder status (OR 0.12; p 0.004). Obesity was less often associated with responder status, however did not reach significance (OR 0.46; p 0.15).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective study, zileuton response varies across asthmatics, with poorer response rates being associated with those with severe asthma and possibly obesity. Although prescription trends for zileuton may predominate amongst severe asthmatics, this tendency does not seem to mirror the actual likelihood to respond. As against the trivial role for zileuton per current GINA algorithms, our study brings forward a notion that zileuton may well be considered along with LTRAs (like montelukast) for non-severe asthma.

Results of the phase 1b study of ABBV-399 (telisotuzumab vedotin; teliso-v) in combination with erlotinib in patients with c-Met+ non-small cell lung cancer by EGFR mutation status

3011

Background: Telisotuzumab vedotin (ABBV-399; teliso-v [T]) is a c-Met–targeted antibody and MMAE drug conjugate. Activity of T was shown in late-line c-Met+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) irrespective of EGFR mutation (M+) status. We present mature data from the T+ erlotinib (E) cohort of a phase 1b study (NCT02099058) by EGFR M+ status. Methods: T was administered at 2.4 mg/kg (dose-escalation phase) or 2.7 mg/kg IV Q3W, and E at 150 mg PO QD/prior tolerated dose in adult patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC. Efficacy-evaluable pts were c-Met+ (central lab IHC H-score ≥150 or local lab MET amplification/Ex 14 skipping) and had ≥1 postbaseline scan or discontinued study. EGFR M+ was defined as del19 or L858R by local lab. PK was assessed. Results: As of Dec 2018, 42 NSCLC pts received T+E; 37 were c-MET+ (36 evaluable; 35 H-score≥150, 1 MET amplified). Median age was 65 years, 25 pts (69%) had ECOG PS 1, 29 (81%) were EGFR M+ (97% had prior EGFR TKI, 55% 3rd-generation TKI, 69% TKI as last prior therapy, and 62% platinum doublet). All-grade (Gr; ≥20%) adverse events (AEs) were dermatitis acneiform (38%), diarrhea (36%), peripheral motor/sensory neuropathy (52%; 7% Gr 3), dyspnea, fatigue, hypoalbuminemia (31% each), decreased appetite, nausea (24% each), asthenia, vomiting (21% each). Gr ≥3 (≥10%) AE: pulmonary embolism (14%). PK of T+E was similar to single-agent T. The table presents efficacy data. Conclusions: These data suggest acceptable safety and promising activity of T+E and support further study in EGFR M+ c-Met+ NSCLC pts for whom frontline EGFR TKI failed. Clinical trial information: NCT02099058. [Table: see text]

First-in-Human Phase I, Dose-Escalation and -Expansion Study of Telisotuzumab Vedotin, an Antibody–Drug Conjugate Targeting c-Met, in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

Purpose

This first-in-human study evaluated telisotuzumab vedotin (Teliso-V), formerly called ABBV-399, an antibody–drug conjugate of the anti–c-Met monoclonal antibody ABT-700 and monomethyl auristatin E.

Materials and Methods

For dose escalation, three to six patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled in eight cohorts (0.15 to 3.3 mg/kg). The dose-expansion phase enrolled patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with c-Met–overexpressing tumors (c-Met positive; immunohistochemistry membrane H-score ≥ 150). Patients received Teliso-V monotherapy intravenously on day 1 once every 3 weeks. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and maximum tolerated dose were determined.

Results

Forty-eight patients were enrolled (median age, 65 years; 35.4% NSCLC; median four prior therapies). One patient each in the 3.0-mg/kg (n = 9) and 3.3-mg/kg (n = 3) cohorts experienced dose-limiting toxicities. Although the maximum tolerated dose was not formally identified, the recommended phase II dose was defined as 2.7 mg/kg on the basis of overall safety and tolerability. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (any grade) were fatigue (42%), nausea (27%), constipation (27%), decreased appetite (23%), vomiting (21%), dyspnea (21%), diarrhea (19%), peripheral edema (19%), and neuropathy (17%). The most frequent Teliso-V–related grade ≥ 3 adverse events were fatigue, anemia, neutropenia, and hypoalbuminemia (4% each). Teliso-V and total antibody pharmacokinetics were approximately dose proportional, with a mean harmonic half-life of 2 to 4 days each. Prospective screening identified 35 (60%) of 58 patients with c-Met–positive NSCLC. Of 16 patients with c-Met–positive NSCLC who were treated with Teliso-V 2.4 to 3.0 mg/kg, three (18.8%; 95% CI, 4.1% to 45.7%) achieved a partial response (median response duration, 4.8 months; median progression-free survival, 5.7 months; 95% CI, 1.2 months to 15.4 months). No other patients experienced a response.

Conclusion

Teliso-V monotherapy demonstrated favorable safety and tolerability profiles, with encouraging evidence of antitumor activity in patients with c-Met–positive NSCLC.

Nonrestorative Treatments for Caries: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

The goal of nonrestorative or non- and microinvasive caries treatment (fluoride- and nonfluoride-based interventions) is to manage the caries disease process at a lesion level and minimize the loss of sound tooth structure. The purpose of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to summarize the available evidence on nonrestorative treatments for the outcomes of 1) arrest or reversal of noncavitated and cavitated carious lesions on primary and permanent teeth and 2) adverse events. We included parallel and split-mouth randomized controlled trials where patients were followed for any length of time. Studies were identified with MEDLINE and Embase via Ovid, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Pairs of reviewers independently conducted the selection of studies, data extraction, risk-of-bias assessments, and assessment of the certainty in the evidence with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Data were synthesized with a random effects model and a frequentist approach. Forty-four trials (48 reports) were eligible, which included 7,378 participants and assessed the effect of 22 interventions in arresting or reversing noncavitated or cavitated carious lesions. Four network meta-analyses suggested that sealants + 5% sodium fluoride (NaF) varnish, resin infiltration + 5% NaF varnish, and 5,000-ppm F (1.1% NaF) toothpaste or gel were the most effective for arresting or reversing noncavitated occlusal, approximal, and noncavitated and cavitated root carious lesions on primary and/or permanent teeth, respectively (low- to moderate-certainty evidence). Study-level data indicated that 5% NaF varnish was the most effective for arresting or reversing noncavitated facial/lingual carious lesions (low certainty) and that 38% silver diamine fluoride solution applied biannually was the most effective for arresting advanced cavitated carious lesions on any coronal surface (moderate to high certainty). Preventing the onset of caries is the ultimate goal of a caries management plan. However, if the disease is present, there is a variety of effective interventions to treat carious lesions nonrestoratively.