Effectiveness of biologic therapies in children with palmoplantar plaque psoriasis: An analysis of real-life data from the BiPe cohorts

BACKGROUND

Palmoplantar plaque psoriasis is a frequent clinical subtype of childhood psoriasis. This study evaluated the effectiveness of biologic therapies in children with palmoplantar plaque psoriasis using data from the two Biological treatments for Pediatric Psoriasis (BiPe) cohorts.

METHODS

Data for all 170 patients included in the BiPe cohorts were analyzed. Data on the effectiveness (PGA, PASI between baseline and 3 months of treatment) of biologic therapies were then compared between children with palmoplantar plaque psoriasis (n = 20) and those with generalized plaque psoriasis (n = 136). Clinical and demographic data were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Children in the palmoplantar group were more likely to be male (p = .04), with an earlier age of psoriasis onset (p < .001), and more frequent nail involvement (p < .001). After 3 months of biologic treatment, mean PGA scores were higher in the palmoplantar group than in the generalized plaque psoriasis group (p = .004). In the palmoplantar group, continuation rates were higher for adalimumab than for etanercept or ustekinumab (p = .01). Primary inefficacy was a more frequent reason for stopping biologic therapies in the palmoplantar group (p = .01), and disease remission was less frequent (p = .05). Combined systemic and biologic therapies were more frequently used in palmoplantar plaque psoriasis (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the treatment-resistant nature of palmoplantar plaque psoriasis and indicated that adalimumab could be the most effective biologic treatment. Larger studies are needed to allow therapeutic algorithms for palmoplantar plaque psoriasis to be proposed in pediatric psoriasis management guidelines.

Effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in the treatment of atopic dermatitis in children (6-11 years): data from a French multicenter retrospective cohort in daily practice

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab is the first biotherapy available for the treatment of moderate-to-severe childhood atopic dermatitis (AD).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in daily practice.

METHODS

Patients aged 6 to 11, who had received a first dose of dupilumab were included in this multicenter retrospective cohort study. The primary endpoint was change in SCORAD after 3 months of treatment. Secondary endpoints were change in IGA score at 3 months, proportion of patients with SCORAD50 and SCORAD75, description of adverse events and proportion of children in our cohort who would be excluded from pivotal phase 3 clinical trial.

RESULTS

80 patients were included. After 3 months of treatment, there was a significant decrease in SCORAD (mean: 21.8 ± 13.8 vs 53.9 ± 18.5; p<0.0001) and IGA (1.3 ± 0.8 vs 3.5 ± 0.7; p<0.0001). Conjunctivitis was observed in 11.3%(n=9/80); 3 patients experienced dupilumab facial redness (DFR); 17.5% (n=14/80) reported injection site reactions; 6.3% (n=5/80) discontinued treatment. 61.2 % (n=49/80) children were ineligible in the phase 3 trial.

LIMITATIONS

There is no control group. Because it was a real life study based on information from patient medical records in a French multicenter cohort, we cannot rule out the presence of reporting bias generated by the use of patient reported characteristics and missing information.

CONCLUSION

These real-life data confirm the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in children with moderate to severe AD extended to dyshidrosis and atopic prurigo but it also revealed a lower frequency of DFR and conjunctivitis. However, administration in injectable form may be a barrier in this age group.

Children with psoriasis and COVID-19: factors associated with an unfavourable COVID-19 course, and the impact of infection on disease progression (Chi-PsoCov registry)

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has raised questions regarding the management of chronic skin diseases, especially in patients on systemic treatments. Data concerning the use of biologics in adults with psoriasis are reassuring, but data specific to children are missing. Moreover, COVID-19 could impact the course of psoriasis in children.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was therefore to assess the impact of COVID-19 on the psoriasis of children, and the severity of the infection in relation to systemic treatments.

METHODS

We set up an international registry of paediatric psoriasis patients. Children were included if they were under 18 years of age, had a history of psoriasis, or developed it within 1 month of COVID-19 and had COVID-19 with or without symptoms.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty episodes of COVID-19 in 117 children (mean age: 12.4 years) were reported. The main clinical form of psoriasis was plaque type (69.4%). Most children were without systemic treatment (54.2%); 33 (28.3%) were on biologic therapies, and 24 (20%) on non-biologic systemic drugs. COVID-19 was confirmed in 106 children (88.3%) and 3 children had two COVID-19 infections each. COVID-19 was symptomatic for 75 children (62.5%) with a mean duration of 6.5 days, significantly longer for children on non-biologic systemic treatments (P = 0.02) and without systemic treatment (P = 0.006) when compared with children on biologics. The six children who required hospitalization were more frequently under non-biologic systemic treatment when compared with the other children (P = 0.01), and particularly under methotrexate (P = 0.03). After COVID-19, the psoriasis worsened in 17 cases (15.2%). Nine children (8%) developed a psoriasis in the month following COVID-19, mainly a guttate form (P = 0.01).

DISCUSSION

Biologics appear to be safe with no increased risk of severe form of COVID-19 in children with psoriasis. COVID-19 was responsible for the development of psoriasis or the worsening of a known psoriasis for some children.

Effectiveness and Safety of Adalimumab, Etanercept and Ustekinumab for Severe Psoriasis in Children Under 12 Years of Age: A French-Italian Daily Practice Cohort (BiPe Jr)

INTRODUCTION

Biological therapies are valuable treatments for severe psoriasis. Children aged under 12 years are underrepresented in therapeutic trials for these drugs. The objective of the 'BiPe Jr' cohort study was to evaluate the drug survival, effectiveness, tolerance and switching patterns of biological therapies in children under 12 years of age with psoriasis.

METHODS

We conducted a multicentre retrospective study of children with psoriasis who received at least one injection of a biological agent, even off-licence, before the age of 12 years in France and Italy, collecting the data between April and August 2021. The data collected were from March 2012 up to August 2021.

RESULTS

In total, 82 children (mean age: 9.1 years; females: 61.0%) received 106 treatments. The drugs administered were adalimumab (n = 49), etanercept (n = 37), ustekinumab (n = 15), anakinra (n = 2), infliximab (n = 2) and secukinumab (n = 1). The most common form of psoriasis was plaque psoriasis (62.9%). The Physician Global Assessment and the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) scores decreased significantly from baseline to 3 months after treatment initiation for the three main biological drugs; PASI went from 14.1 ± 9.4 to 4.1 ± 11.3 for adalimumab (p = 0.001), 14.9 ± 9.3 to 5.1 ± 4.0 for etanercept (p = 0.002) and 11.6 ± 8.3 to 2.6 ± 2.2 for ustekinumab (p = 0.007). A trend towards higher 2-year maintenance rates was observed for ustekinumab and adalimumab, compared with etanercept (p = 0.06). 52 children discontinued their biological therapy, most frequently due to inefficacy (n = 28) and remission (n = 14). Seven serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported, including four severe infections.

DISCUSSION

Our analyses of drug survival and treatment patterns, combined with those of previous studies conducted in older children, indicate that there is a trend towards higher 2-year survival rates of ustekinumab and adalimumab. The SAEs identified were rare, but highlight the need for increased vigilance concerning infections. Overall, the biological therapies showed good effectiveness and safety profiles when used in daily practice for the treatment of young children with psoriasis.

Switching biologics in children with psoriasis: Results from the BiPe cohort

BACKGROUND

There is currently little information on switching biologics in pediatric psoriasis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the real-world clinical practice and safety of switching biologics in the "Biological Treatments for Pediatric Psoriasis" (BiPe) cohort.

METHODS

Data for all 134 patients included in the BiPe cohort were analyzed. A further evaluation of the subpopulation of patients who switched from a first-line biologic to a second-line biologic was then conducted. Drug survival rates were also compared between biologics given as first-line or second-line agents.

RESULTS

Overall, 29 patients (female: 55%; mean age: 16.6 ± 3.0 years) switched between two biologics. Etanercept (ETN) was the first-line biologic used in 23 patients: 16 (69.6%) switched to adalimumab (ADA) and seven (30.4%) to ustekinumab (UST). Six patients received first-line ADA and switched to UST. Loss of efficacy (62.1%), primary inefficacy (20.7%), and parental choice (6.9%) were the main reasons for switching biologics. One (3.4%) of the switches was performed because of adverse events or intolerance. For UST and ADA, the 18-month drug survival rate did not differ according to whether the agent was given as a first-line or second-line biologic (UST: P = .24; ADA: P = .68). No significant differences in drug survival rates were observed between the three different switches (ADA to UST, ETN to ADA, and ETN to UST).

CONCLUSION

Our study provided key insights into the real-life clinical practice of switching biologics in pediatric psoriasis patients. However, more information and guidance on switching biologics in pediatric psoriasis are needed to improve real-life practice and outcomes.

COVID-19 et psoriasis chez l’enfant. Données d’une cohorte internationale

Introduction

Le psoriasis touche 0,5 à 1 % des enfants. L’infection à SARS-CoV-2 pourrait avoir un impact sur le psoriasis (poussées induites voire psoriasis de novo), et les traitements systémiques du psoriasis pourraient favoriser la survenue de formes plus sévères de COVID-19. Chez l’adulte psoriasique la COVID-19 est plus sévère chez les patients âgés, obèses, « non blancs » et sous immunosuppresseurs non biologiques (registre PsoProTect). Il n’existe pas de données pédiatriques.

L’objectif de l’étude menée chez des enfants psoriasiques ayant contracté l’infection par le SARS-CoV-2 était de :.

– étudier l’impact de l’infection à SARS-CoV2 sur le psoriasis (poussée de psoriasis, changement de phénotype, psoriasis de novo) ;

– et étudier l’impact des traitements systémiques, biologiques ou non, sur le risque de développer une forme sévère de COVID-19.

Matériel et méthodes

Étude transversale, multicentrique, internationale, menée à partir de février 2021, par appel à cas auprès de la SFDP, du GrPso et de la SIDerP (Italie), et relayé par la BSPD (Royaume-Uni) et l’ESPD (Europe). Tout enfant (< 18 ans) psoriasique présentant une infection à SARS-CoV-2 symptomatique ou non était inclus. Le psoriasis pouvait préexister à l’infection ou se développer dans le mois suivant l’infection à SARS-CoV-2 (psoriasis de novo).

Résultats

Un total de 46 enfants (France, n = 30 ; Italie, n = 3 ; Pologne, n = 9 ; Russie, n = 3 ; et Portugal, n = 1) ont été inclus. L’âge moyen était de 12,2 ± 4,0 ans ; il y avait 20 (43,5%) filles. Les caractéristiques du psoriasis sont détaillées dans le tableau. Quatorze enfants étaient sous biothérapies et 5 sous systémiques oraux. Dans 84,8 % des cas l’infection à SARS-CoV-2 était confirmée. Dans 63 % des cas, il s’agissait de formes symptomatiques, avec en cas de symptômes une durée moyenne des symptômes de 6,4 ± 5,2 j. Le traitement systémique a été maintenu dans 84,2 % des cas. Dans 5 cas le psoriasis s’était aggravé au décours de la COVID-19 avec un phénotype similaire, dans 1 cas il s’agissait d’un psoriasis de novo. Les enfants sous biothérapies ne présentaient pas de formes plus sévères, avec même une tendance, en cas de forme symptomatique, à une durée plus courte des symptômes (4,0 vs 7,5 j, p = 0,047) par rapport aux enfants sans traitements.

Discussion

Ce 1^er travail mené chez l’enfant psoriasique infecté par le SARS-CoV-2 montre que l’infection peut induire dans près de 13 % des cas des poussées de psoriasis, voire un psoriasis de novo. En cas de forme symptomatique, il s’agissait toujours de formes bénignes, et les biothérapies semblaient plutôt associées à une forme moins sévère de COVID-19, confirmant ainsi les données observées chez l’adulte (PsoProTect). Malgré la faiblesse de l’effectif, et en s’appuyant sur les données adultes, nous pouvons rassurer les enfants psoriasis recevant des systémiques, notamment des biothérapies, en cas d’infection par le SARS-CoV-2.

Characteristics of children and adolescents with atopic dermatitis who attended therapeutic patient education

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, relapsing, inflammatory skin disease. Therapeutic patient education (TPE) has been demonstrated to be effective in AD in reducing disease severity and improving coping and quality of life.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of children and adolescents with AD who had attended TPE sessions, as well as the characteristics of their parents, and compare them with those who did not attend TPE.

METHODS

Parents of children with AD aged 6-17 years old were recruited from a representative sample of the French population contacted by e-mail. Sociodemographic data and clinical information were collected in patients and parents. Clinical severity was assessed by parents using a proxy version of the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM). Attendance to TPE sessions was assessed by the following question 'did your child or one or both parents attended TPE for AD?'. Also, the number of sessions was recorded. Determinants of TPE attendance were evaluated by univariable and multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

Data were collected on 1063 parents and children with AD. A total of 131 (12.3%) children and/or parents attended TPE sessions. Most of them attended 2-5 TPE sessions. In that group, there were 85 boys (64.9%), and severity evaluated by POEM was mild in 29.8%, moderate in 52.7% and severe in 17.6% of patients. In the multivariable model, attending TPE sessions was significantly associated with sex of the child (boy vs. girl), consultation with a dermatologist or a paediatrician, high clinical severity and presence of AD in parents.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite recommendations, the use of TPE in children with AD is still low in France. There is a need for implementing such programmes in the management of the disease, in particular when the disease is severe.

Acute acral eruptions in children during the COVID-19 pandemic: Characteristics of 103 children and their family clusters

Background

A marked increase in frequency of acute acral eruptions (AAE) was observed in children during the COVID-19 pandemic in the spring period.

Objectives

In this observational multicenter study, based on children with AAE, we aimed to assess the proportion of household members possibly infected by SARS-CoV-2.

Methods

We collected data from all children observed with AAE, prospectively from April 7, 2020 to June 22, 2020, and retrospectively since February 28, 2020. The primary outcome was the household infection rate, defined as the proportion of family clusters having at least one member with COVID-19 infection other than the child with AAE (“index child”). The definition of a case was based on characteristic clinical signs and a positive PCR or serology.

Results

The study included 103 children in 10 French departments and in Quebec. The median age was 13 years and the interquartile range [8–15], with a female-to-male ratio of 1/1.15. In children with AAE, all PCR tests were negative (n = 18), and serology was positive in 2/14 (14.3%) cases. We found no significant anomalies in the lab results. A total of 66 of the 103 families (64.1%) of included children had at least one other infected member apart from the index child. The total number of household members was 292, of whom 119 (40.8%) were considered possibly infected by SARS-CoV-2. No index children or households exhibited severe COVID-19.

Discussion

Among the 103 households included, 64.1% had at least one infected member. Neither children with AAE nor their households showed severe COVID-19.

[Transitory apocrine hidrocystomatosis of the scrotum]

BACKGROUND

Apocrine hidrocystomas are benign cystic tumors that develop from apocrine gland proliferation. In most cases, they are translucent solitary lesions of the face, generally found in the periorbital region, on the scalp or on the neck. More rarely, apocrine hidrocystomas may be multiple and appear on the ears, trunk, shoulders and genital area. They generally appear in adulthood, with only a few pediatric cases being reported, of which three in the genital area, with a solitary case of multiple hidrocystomas of the scrotum, although no cases of spontaneous involution of hidrocystomas have previously been reported.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two boys aged 4 and 6 months were seen in consultation for small sub-millimeter size, subcutaneous, black lesions on the scrotum that appeared in the weeks following birth. Histological examination of these lesions resulted in a diagnosis of apocrine hidrocystoma. The children were seen again a few weeks later and the skin lesions had totally disappeared. We report two cases of multiple apocrine hidrocystomas on the scrotum with spontaneous involution diagnosed in a 4- and a 6-month-old boy.

DISCUSSION

Apocrine hidrocystomas are rare benign adnexal tumors that develop from apocrine sweat glands. They are considered as cystic proliferations of the apocrine glands rather than simple retention cysts. The main differential diagnosis of the rare cases of multiple apocrine hidrocystomas are eccrine hidrocystomas. The treatment of such lesions is based on surgical excision if they are isolated, daily application of topical atropine 1%, or CO₂ laser for multiple apocrine hidrocystomas.

Ocular Surface Diseases Induced by Dupilumab in Severe Atopic Dermatitis

We report 10 cases of conjunctivitis in atopic dermatitis (AD) patients treated with dupilumab from November 2017 to November 2018 in our institution, who were referred to the ophthalmology department for diagnosis and management of conjunctivitis. We also describe ocular surface findings in these patients before the first injection of dupilumab. During the first 6 months post initiation of dupilumab, incidence of conjunctivitis was 27% (5/18) in patients treated from November 2017 to April 2018 who had not had ocular examination previously. This rate dropped to 12% (3/25) after systematic ophthalmological referral before initiation of dupilumab. Patients who developed conjunctivitis had mean SCORAD score (Scoring Atopic Dermatitis) of 60.4 ± 20 (35-88) and mean EASI score (Eczema Area and Severity Index) of 37 ± 17 (14.6-56). Mean age was 36 years (20-51). Most patients had a long history of AD (> 10 years). Mean delay of ocular surface inflammation was 3.5 months, ranging from 1 to 8 months. One patient had to discontinue dupilumab because of severe follicular conjunctivitis. We observed two clinical patterns of ocular surface diseases: a mild non-specific conjunctivitis with dry eyes, which improved with warm compresses and artificial tears without any recurrence; and a severe dupilumab-induced follicular conjunctivitis without keratitis, which required specific ophthalmological management.

Effectiveness and safety of dupilumab for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in a real-life French multicenter adult cohort

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab is the first biologic available to treat atopic dermatitis (AD). Its effectiveness and safety were demonstrated in clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to assess the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in adults with AD in a real-life French multicenter retrospective cohort.

METHODS

We included patients treated during March 2017-April 2018. Efficacy outcomes, including Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) and Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores, were collected at baseline and 3 months when available. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded at follow-up.

RESULTS

We included 241 patients. The median ± interquartile range (IQR) follow-up time was 3.8 ± 3.7 months. A ≥75% improvement in SCORAD was achieved in 27 of 163 (16.6%) patients, and a ≥75% improvement in EASI was achieved in 40 of 82 (48.8%) patients. The median SCORAD and EASI scores at 3 months were significantly lower than those at baseline (SCORAD ± IQR, 25 ± 21 vs 56 ± 27.4, P < 10^-9 and EASI ± IQR, 4.1 ± 6.8 vs 17.9 ± 15.4, P < 10^-9, respectively). Conjunctivitis was reported in 84 of 241 (38.2%) patients. The proportion with eosinophilia (>500 cells/mm³) during follow-up (57%) was higher than that at baseline (33.7%) (n = 172, P < 10^-6). Dupilumab was stopped in 42 cases; 27 patients stopped because of AEs.

LIMITATIONS

No control group, missing data.

CONCLUSION

This real-life study demonstrated a similar dupilumab effectiveness as that seen in clinical trials, but it also revealed a higher frequency of conjunctivitis and eosinophilia.

[Vemurafenib-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis]

BACKGROUND

Herein we report the first case of toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) occurring with use of vemurafenib.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A 75-year-old female patient was being treated with vemurafenib for stage IV melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation. She suddenly presented fever, diffuse pruriginous maculopapular erythema, palpebral edema, palmar bulla, conjunctivitis, cheilitis and mucosal ulceration. The condition progressed towards detachment affecting 50% of the skin area. Cutaneous biopsy revealed lichenoid dermatosis, chiefly vesicular with numerous eosinophils. Direct immunofluorescence (IFD) was negative. Vemurafenib was the only drug to which the reaction was ascribable and we concluded on vemurafenib-induced TEN.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of vemurafenib-induced TEN, but this adverse effect, although already described in the BRIM-3 study, appears rare in clinical practice. Other severe skin reactions have been described in the literature. These include a case of Stevens-Johnson syndrome in a female patient treated with vemurafenib and previously receiving ipilimumab. A more common occurrence is cutaneous reactions involving efflorescence of benign hyperkeratotic lesions, occasionally accompanied by authentic epidermal carcinoma or keratoacanthoma, and requiring regular dermatological monitoring of patients treated with vemurafenib.

CONCLUSION

If maculopapular exanthema occurs under vemurafenib, continuation of this treatment should be reassessed since the risk of progression to a more serious condition such as TEN, as seen in the present case, cannot be ruled out.

A multicentre study to determine the value and safety of drug patch tests for the three main classes of severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions

BACKGROUND

Drug patch tests (PTs) can reproduce delayed hypersensitivity to drugs and entail a moderate re-exposure of patients to offending drugs.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the value of PTs for identifying the responsible drug in severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions (SCARs) such as acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) and Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN).

METHODS

In a multicentre study, PTs were conducted on patients referred for DRESS, AGEP or SJS/TEN within 1 year of their SCAR. All drugs administered in the 2 months prior to and the week following the onset of the SCAR were tested.

RESULTS

Among the 134 patients included (48 male, 86 female; mean age 51·7 years), positive drug PTs were obtained for 24 different drugs. These included positive tests for 64% (46/72) of patients with DRESS, 58% (26/45) of those with AGEP and 24% (4/17) of those with SJS/TEN, with only one relapse of AGEP. The value of PTs depended on the type of drug and the type of SCAR (e.g. carbamazepine was positive in 11/13 DRESS cases but none of the five SJS/TEN cases). PTs were frequently positive for beta lactams (22 cases), pristinamycin (11 cases) and in DRESS with pump proton inhibitors (five cases), but were usually negative for allopurinol and salazopyrin. Of 18 patients with DRESS, eight had virus reactivation and positive PTs. In DRESS, multiple drug reactivity was frequent (18% of cases), with patients remaining sensitized many years later.

CONCLUSIONS

PTs are useful and safe for identifying agents inducing SCAR.