Ocular Surface Diseases Induced by Dupilumab in Severe Atopic Dermatitis

Ocular Surface Adverse Events are not Associated with Dupilumab use in Nasal Polyp Treatment

OBJECTIVES

Ocular surface reactions (OSR) have been associated with dupilumab for atopic dermatitis (AD) treatment. However, the association of dupilumab-associated OSR (DA-OSR) for nasal polyps (CRSwNP) treatment has not been studied. We evaluated DA-OSR for CRSwNP treatment using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

METHODS

FAERS was queried for any general ocular reactions (DA-GOR) from 2019Q1 to 2022Q4. DA-OSR were subcategorized from DA-GOR and compared between treatment groups (CRSwNP, asthma, AD). Logistic regression was used to predict DA-OSR. Disproportionality analysis (DPA) of DA-OSR was performed using OpenVigil.

RESULTS

There were 60,198 total observations, of which 5344 were treated for CRSwNP. The prevalence of DA-GOR and DA-OSR was greatest for AD (15.3%, 7.8%), followed by CRSwNP (12.2%, 6.7%) and asthma (9.2%, 3.5%). The most commonly reported OSRs were dry eyes (35.9%), conjunctivitis (15.7%), and increased lacrimation (11.0%). The reported odds ratio (ROR) of CRSwNP-treated DA-OSR was 0.84 (0.73-0.97; p = 0.015), compared to 1.29 (1.20-1.40; p < 0.001) for AD and 0.66 (0.59-0.73; p < 0.001) for asthma. For CRSwNP treatment, the DA-OSR ROR was 0.97 (0.90-1.03; p = 0.3) for men and 0.78 (0.73-0.83, p < 0.001) for older adults (age > 50). ROR in the DPA for DA-OSR was 12.5 (12.2-12.8; p < 0.001) for any indication and 0.58 (0.53-0.64; p < 0.001) for CRSwNP treatment only.

CONCLUSIONS

While there are limitations to FAERS, this study confirms the association between dupilumab and OSR for AD treatment, and does not support an association between dupilumab and OSR for CRSwNP treatment. Younger adults experience more DA-OSR in CRSwNP treatment without a specific predilection for sex.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV Laryngoscope, 134:2602-2608, 2024.

Dupilumab induced ocular surface disease: A prospective case series

PURPOSE

To identify the incidence, risk factors, demographics, and clinical profile of dupilumab-induced ocular surface disease (DIOSD) in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), propose a standardised treatment protocol (STP) and evaluate the response.

METHODS

Prospective case series of AD patients treated in the Dermatology Department, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK developing ocular symptoms after commencing Dupilumab between September 2018 and February 2020. A standard history and examination protocol were used including subjective symptom severity grading and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire on each visit. Standard treatment was prescribed, and response evaluated.

RESULTS

32 of 113 included patients (28.31%) developed DIOSD, of which 20 (62.5%) were referred to the Cornea Service. Median age was 38.0 years (IQR 26.8; range 19-74). Male to female ratio was 1:1. Average time to onset of ocular symptoms from starting dupilumab was 9.2 weeks (IQR 8.8; range 0.1-40). 90% patients had bilateral conjunctival inflammation and blepharitis at presentation. Significant improvement in the subjective severity scale and the median OSDI score (from 34.0 to 10.2) was noted in response to topical eye treatment. Dupilumab was discontinued in none.

CONCLUSIONS

DIOSD is not uncommon although, with timely referral and appropriate topical treatment better clinical outcome and patient satisfaction can be achieved without the need to discontinue Dupilumab. Prior allergic conjunctivitis did not affect the incidence or severity of DIOSD. Further prospective studies with longer follow-up and more focus on possible disease mechanism such as goblet cell related changes and immune response are needed.

Peripheral ulcerative keratitis associated with tralokinumab therapy: a case report and review of IL-13 inhibitor-associated ocular surface disease

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab and tralokinumab are interleukin-binding monoclonal antibodies used to treat systemic atopic disease. Use of these medications in management of atopic dermatitis (AD) is known to cause conjunctivitis. Dupilumab therapy has also been associated with more severe ocular surface disease, which has not previously been described in association with tralokinumab. This report describes a case of tralokinumab-associated conjunctivitis and peripheral ulcerative keratitis and reviews the spectrum and proposed mechanisms of ocular surface disease triggered by these medications.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 61-year-old male with no rheumatologic or ocular history presented with bilateral papillary conjunctivitis and right eye peripheral ulcerative keratitis (PUK). PUK was arrested using oral corticosteroids and doxycycline, and long-term control of papillary conjunctivitis was achieved using topical tacrolimus ointment, allowing continuation of effective AD management with tralokinumab.

CONCLUSION

This case report documents ulcerative keratitis occurring in association with tralokinumab therapy for AD, which has previously been described with dupilumab but not tralokinumab. This report demonstrates the need for vigilant ocular surface monitoring for patients on tralokinumab and illustrates successful management and long-term control of adverse ocular events associated with this medication.

Uncommon Blepharitis

Blepharitis is a common chronic inflammatory condition affecting the eyelid margins; the pathophysiology of blepharitis is complex and not fully understood. The disease is anatomically divided into anterior (inflammation of eyelashes) and posterior (meibomian gland dysfunction) types. Diagnosis relies on clinical examination, revealing characteristic features like scurf, vascular changes, and meibomian gland dysfunction. The main goals of blepharitis treatment are symptom relief, recurrence prevention, and complication risk minimization. Treatment options include lid hygiene, topical and systemic antibiotics, topical corticosteroids, and omega-3 supplements. However, it is important to highlight reported cases of blepharitis as side effects of systemic therapies, particularly in the context of chemotherapy, bortezomib, cetuximab, TNFα inhibitors, and dupilumab. It is crucial to monitor patients undergoing such treatments regularly and attentively in order to promptly set up adequate supportive therapy. Of even more importance is future research on the pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for the occurrence of these ocular side effects in order to find a nosological cure for the issue.

Management of vernal keratoconjunctivitis: Navigating a changing treatment landscape

Vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) is a chronic, progressive, and potentially sight-threatening form of ocular inflammatory disease that primarily affects children and young adults. Prevalence varies by region, ranging from <2 per 10,000 in the United States to as high as 1,100 per 10,000 in parts of Africa. The rarity of VKC in developed countries can make differential diagnosis challenging, and treatment is often delayed until the disease is advanced, and symptoms are significantly impacting patients' quality of life. Although once viewed primarily as an immunoglobulin E-mediated condition, approximately 50% of patients with VKC do not exhibit allergic sensitization. It is now recognized that the immunopathology of VKC involves multiple inflammatory pathways that lead to the signs, symptoms, and conjunctival eosinophilic and fibroproliferative lesions that are a hallmark of the disease. We examine the evolution of our understanding of the immunopathology of VKC, the expanding VKC treatment armamentarium, the clinical implications of emerging treatment approaches, and future directions for VKC research and practice.

Biologics in severe uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: A bicentric experience

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The introduction of biologics in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) has allowed new therapeutic options and Dupilumab represents the first approved biological agent. Aim of this paper is to provide a multicentric study in a real-life setting of treatment with Dupilumab for severe uncontrolled CRSwNP in Italy.

METHODS

A retrospective data collection was performed from the departments of Otolaryngology of two major health institutions in Rome: San Camillo Forlanini Hospital and Tor Vergata University. Both centres contributed to the study providing information about patients affected by severe uncontrolled CRSwNP and treated with Dupilumab.

RESULTS

A total of 83 patients were included in the study (43 males; 40 females; mean age: 55.8 years). Monitoring our patients, we observed improvement in reduction of nasal polyposis and nasal obstruction, respectively measured through NPS and PNIF. Concerning the CRSwNP symptoms and their impact on quality of life, we found an improvement in the olfaction, as measured respectively by SSIT-16 and SNOT-22.

CONCLUSIONS

Dupilumab has demonstrated broad efficacy in CRSwNP management. Further studies are needed to confirm our results and to establish biomarkers to identify endotypes and predict response to biologics treatment in CRSwNP.

Atopic dermatitis and ocular allergy: common mechanisms and uncommon questions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Atopic dermatitis (AD) and ocular allergy aka allergic eye disease (AED) are two common conditions that often coexist in patients. However, molecular connections between these two conditions are incompletely understood. While common etiologic components including Th2 immune signaling have been suggested for AD and AED, the mechanism how current Th2-targetd therapies (dupilumab, tralokinumab) for AD can augment conjunctivitis is not well understood.

RECENT FINDINGS

Differentially regulated genes and pathways relevant for AD disease manifestation are known. In contrast, similar information is not yet available for AED, which could be largely addressed by emerging noninvasive ocular sampling techniques. Emerging evidence indicated a reduction in goblet cell number and mucin production in a subpopulation of AD patients with AD leading to adverse ocular outcomes, while other potential mechanisms could also be involved. Involvement of particular barrier function protein(s) in AED needs further investigation.

SUMMARY

Modern cytokine-targeted therapies for AD showed elevated risk for developing conjunctivitis. Recently developed noninvasive sampling techniques should be leveraged to identify AD endotypes associated with AED and with dupilumab-associated ocular outcomes.

Eblasakimab, a novel IL-13 receptor alpha 1 monoclonal antibody, blocks STAT6 phosphorylation with low dose in human volunteers

Eblasakimab is a first-in-class monoclonal antibody under investigation for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) which targets IL-13Rα1, a subunit of the Type 2 receptor complex. IL-13Rα1 stimulates phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (STAT6) to drive inflammation. This brief report investigates the mechanistic basis of eblasakimab and its effects on IL-13Rα1 signaling as part of a phase 1a, open-label, single ascending dose study. Single ascending doses of eblasakimab were administered by intravenous or subcutaneous injection to healthy male volunteers. The impact of eblasakimab on IL-13Rα1 receptor occupancy and STAT6 phosphorylation was assessed in participant blood monocytes. No serious treatment emergent adverse events were reported. Eblasakimab effectively blocked the IL-13Rα1 receptor and inhibited STAT6 phosphorylation with single doses of 3 mg/kg intravenously and 300 mg subcutaneously. Results support further clinical development of eblasakimab as a novel biologic for AD, with potential for 2- to 4-week dosing regimens.

Effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in adults with moderate and severe atopic dermatitis in Colombia: Real-life experience

Background

Dupilumab is a treatment approved for uncontrolled moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Tropical and developing countries such as Colombia have characteristics that may impact the natural history of AD and access to medical treatments. In that sense, we aimed to describe the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in adults with moderate to severe AD in a Colombian multicenter cohort.

Methods

Multicenter descriptive study that included patients who started treatment between March 2018 and May 2020 in 6 centers. Disease severity was assessed using the following: Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD), Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). These measurements were collected according to availability at baseline, 3-5 months, 6-12 months, and more than 12 months. Days of sick leave, hospitalizations, and AD flares before and after dupilumab treatment were reported. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded during follow-up.

Results

Ninety-three patients were included, with a median age of 32 years (IQR: 24.0; 40.0) and a disease evolution time of 21 years (IQR: 16.0; 29.5). 88.2% had at least 1 allergic disease other than AD. An improvement greater than or equal to 75% EASI was observed in 41.7% of patients at 3-5 months, in 73.7% of patients at 6-12 months, and in 75.0% of patients after 12 months. For those reporting SCORAD and POEM, the median percent change ([IQR], n) from baseline in SCORAD was -67.1 ([-79.2; -54.2], n = 16), -70.5 ([-85.8; -47.9], n = 36) and -66.7 ([-77.3; -51.0], n = 13); and POEM, -58.6 ([-66.4; -55.5], n = 4), -73.0 ([-86.5; -66.7], n = 16) and -87.3 ([-93.4; -69.6], n = 8), respectively. Before initiation of dupilumab treatment, 82 (88.2%) patients reported at least 1 flare of AD in the past 12 months. During the follow-up period, 30 (32.3%) patients reported at least 1 exacerbation or flare. Twelve patients (12.9%) presented an AE and 3 (3.2%) patients discontinued dupilumab for this cause.

Conclusions

Dupilumab was effective and safe for the treatment of moderate to severe AD in point-of-care settings, with results similar to randomized controlled and other real-life studies. These positive results are still maintained even though a high number of patients had short interruptions in the use of dupilumab due to administrative problems.

Dupilumab-Induced, Tralokinumab-Induced, and Belantamab Mafodotin-Induced Adverse Ocular Events-Incidence, Etiology, and Management

ABSTRACT

Emerging monoclonal antibody therapies are assuming greater importance in the management of severe and refractory forms of immunity-driven and oncological disorders. However, some have been found to induce adverse ocular events (AOEs) leading to discontinuation of treatment or additional multidisciplinary management. We present the current knowledge concerning AOEs associated with 3 monoclonal antibody therapies: dupilumab, tralokinumab, and belantamab mafodotin. We examine the manifestations of their AOEs, proposed pathophysiological mechanisms, and current treatment recommendations. We identified and reviewed all studies for dupilumab, tralokinumab, and belantamab mafodotin using the keywords "dupilumab," "tralokinumab," "belantamab mafodotin," "conjunctivitis," and "keratopathy" from January 2016 to November 2021. Conjunctivitis was the most frequently reported AOE in patients with atopic dermatitis receiving dupilumab or tralokinumab. Mild cases were managed with warm compresses for associated meibomian gland dysfunction, artificial tears, and antihistamine/mast cell stabilizer eye drops. In more severe cases, additional anti-inflammatory therapy, with corticosteroid eye drops or ointments, or topical calcineurin inhibitors-such as tacrolimus or ciclosporin-were required. Patients with resistant or refractory multiple myeloma treated with belantamab mafodotin often developed keratopathy, which could necessitate contact lens fitting, or for cycles of belantamab mafodotin to be delayed.

Association between Dupilumab and Conjunctivitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Conjunctivitis is commonly reported in dupilumab users with atopic dermatitis (AD), and few studies have compared the risk of conjunctivitis among patients with different indications. This study aimed to investigate the association between dupilumab and conjunctivitis in various diseases. The protocol of this study was registered on PROSPERO (ID CRD42023396204). The electronic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted for the period from their inception to January 2023. Only placebo-controlled, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The main outcome was the incidence of conjunctivitis during the study period. The subgroup analysis was performed for patients with AD and non-AD indications, which include asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, and eosinophilic esophagitis. In total, 23 RCTs involving 9153 patients were included for meta-analysis. Dupilumab users exhibited significantly higher risk of conjunctivitis (risk ratio [RR], 1.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34–2.67) than placebo users. Notably, significantly increased incidence of conjunctivitis was observed in the dupilumab group relative to the placebo group among patients with AD (RR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.84–3.12) but not among patients with non-AD indications (RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.43–1.13). In conclusion, only dupilumab users with AD but not those with non-AD indications reported an elevated incidence of conjunctivitis.

Multicenter prospective observational study of dupilumab-induced ocular events in atopic dermatitis patients

BACKGROUND

Although ocular adverse events are frequent in AD patients treated with dupilumab, their characterization remains limited due to a lack of prospective studies with a systematic ophthalmological examination.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the incidence, characteristics and risk factors of dupilumab-induced ocular adverse events.

METHODS

A prospective, multicenter, and real-life study in adult AD patients treated with dupilumab.

RESULTS

At baseline, 27 out of 181 patients (14.9%) had conjunctivitis. At week 16 (W16), 25 out of 27 had improved their conjunctivitis and 2 remained stable and 34 out of 181 patients (18.7%) had dupilumab-induced blepharoconjunctivitis: either de novo (n = 32) or worsening of underlying blepharoconjunctivitis (n = 2). Most events (27/34; 79.4%) were moderate. A multivariate analysis showed that head and neck AD (OR = 7.254; 95%CI [1.938-30.07]; p = 0.004), erythroderma (OR = 5.635; 95%CI [1.635-21.50]; p = 0.007) and the presence of dry eye syndrome at baseline (OR = 3.51; 95%CI [3.158-13.90]; p = 0.031) were independent factors associated with dupilumab-induced blepharoconjunctivitis.

LIMITATIONS

Our follow-up period was 16 weeks and some late-onset time effects may still occur.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that most dupilumab-induced blepharoconjunctivitis cases are de novo. AD severity and conjunctivitis at baseline were not found to be associated risk factors in this study.

Incidence of Bacterial and Nonbacterial Conjunctivitis in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis Treated With Dupilumab: A US Multidatabase Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab-associated conjunctivitis in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) is not fully characterized.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to characterize the incidence of bacterial and nonbacterial conjunctivitis among patients with AD who initiated dupilumab.

METHODS

Pooling longitudinal claims data from 2 US databases, we identified AD patients who newly filled either dupilumab or methotrexate, mycophenolate or cyclosporine, between March 2017 and January 2020. Outcomes were conjunctivitis and its subtypes, bacterial, allergic, and keratoconjunctivitis. Patient follow-up lasted 6 months and 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching-controlled confounding.

RESULTS

Within 6 months of treatment initiation, the incidence of conjunctivitis was 6.6% in 3744 dupilumab initiators; bacterial conjunctivitis, 1.5%; allergic conjunctivitis, 2.2%; keratoconjunctivitis, 0.8%; and conjunctivitis requiring ophthalmic medication, 2.7%. After PS matching, dupilumab doubled the risk of conjunctivitis compared with methotrexate (relative risk [RR] 2.12; 1.56-2.91), mycophenolate (RR = 2.43; 1.32-4.47), or cyclosporine (RR = 1.83; 1.05-3.20). Risk of bacterial conjunctivitis was 1.6- to 4.0-fold increased with wide confidence intervals, and allergic conjunctivitis was increased 2.7- to 7-fold. There was no increased risk of keratoconjunctivitis. Patients with comorbid asthma had a further increased risk of conjunctivitis.

CONCLUSIONS

One in 15 patients treated with dupilumab developed conjunctivitis driven by bacterial and allergic conjunctivitis and not keratoconjunctivitis. This risk was further increased with comorbid asthma.

Biologics for allergy: therapeutic potential for ocular allergic diseases and adverse effects on the eye

Biologics applying antibodies against IgE, IL-5, IL-5 receptor α, IL-4 receptor α, and IL-13 have dramatically improved recent treatment outcomes in allergic diseases including asthma, rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis. However, these drugs have not been approved for ocular allergic diseases such as allergic conjunctivitis, vernal keratoconjunctivitis, and atopic keratoconjunctivitis. Although the putative mechanisms suggest that these drugs should have beneficial effects in patients with ocular allergies and some studies have reported such beneficial effects, various adverse ocular symptoms have also been observed in clinical trials and off-label use studies. Since ocular allergic diseases have distinct pathogeneses, each biologic drug must be examined regarding specific effects on each ocular allergy. For example, IgE-mediated type 1 hypersensitivity plays a critical role in allergic conjunctivitis. By contrast, T cells and eosinophilic and non-IgE-mediated type 2 inflammation play important roles in vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Allergists must fully understand the effects of each drug on the eye. This review outlines both potential therapeutic and adverse effects of various biologics on allergic diseases of the eye.

Dupilumab-associated ectropion and punctal stenosis treated with tacrolimus ointment (0.03%) in a 15-year-old girl

A 15-year-old Asian girl with severe atopic dermatitis was referred for dupilumab-associated blepharoconjunctivitis. Medical history was significant for severe atopic dermatitis. She was started on prednisolone acetate 1% ophthalmic suspension three times daily, and dupilumab injections were withheld after the initial visit. The patient was noted to have right lower eyelid ectropion, cicatricial occlusion, and severe punctal stenosis 6 weeks later. She was started on 0.03% tacrolimus ointment to the eyelid margin. Resolution of ectropion and restoration of punctal patency with residual stenosis were observed 4 weeks later. This is the first reported adolescent case of dupilumab-associated ectropion and punctal stenosis successfully treated with topical tacrolimus ointment.

Effects of systemic targeted immunosuppressive therapy on ocular surface

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to give an overview of the corneal manifestations of targeted systemic immunotherapies and provide guidelines for management when applicable.

RECENT FINDINGS

The advent of newer systemic immunosuppressive therapy has resulted in the need for more awareness of potential ocular side effects. Side effects can range from vortex keratopathy as seen with the tyrosine kinase inhibitors, to epithelial microcysts as reported in the use of cytarabine and belantamab mafodotin, spontaneous corneal perforations have been reported with programmed death 1 inhibitors, while eyelid cicatrization has been reported epidermal growth factor inhibitors. Several immunomodulatory therapies result in conjunctivitis which tends to respond to topical lubrication and corticosteroid treatment. Most manifestations listed in the review are limited to the anterior segment; however, some may lead to retinal and optic nerve changes which can be permanently damaging.

SUMMARY

Ocular surface and corneal changes secondary to systemic immunosuppression can affect main components of the ocular surface. Although most adverse effects are reversible, few changes can be permanent and therefore close ophthalmologic monitoring is necessary.

Dupilumab-Associated Adverse Events During Treatment of Allergic Diseases

Among the new biological therapies for atopic diseases, dupilumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody directed against IL-4Rα, the common chain of interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 receptors. Dupilumab showed clinical improvements in patients with atopic dermatitis, asthma, and chronic rhinosinusitis and is currently under development for other indications. While dupilumab is considered to be well tolerated, a number of recent publications have reported various adverse events. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge about these adverse events, which may help clinicians to improve the follow-up of patients on dupilumab. Injection-site reactions are the most common reported adverse event. However, dupilumab has also been shown to cause ophthalmic complications (e.g., dry eyes, conjunctivitis, blepharitis, keratitis, and ocular pruritus), head and neck dermatitis, onset of psoriatic lesions, progression of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma exacerbation, alopecia areata, hypereosinophilia, and arthritis. Most are managed during dupilumab treatment continuation, but some (e.g., severe conjunctivitis) may result in a discontinuation of treatment. Their molecular origin is unclear and requires further investigations. Among other hypothesis, it has been suggested that T helper (Th)2-mediated pathway inhibition may worsen Th1/Th17-dependent immune responses. An ophthalmological examination for the presence of potential predictive indicators of ophthalmic adverse events is recommended before initiation of dupilumab therapy.

Dupilumab-associated cicatrizing ocular disease

Purpose

To describe three cases of bilateral cicatrizing conjunctivitis associated with dupilumab treatment for atopic dermatitis.

Observations

Case 1 is a 69 year-old male with a history of mild, stable cicatrizing conjunctivitis thought to be secondary to atopic dermatitis. His cicatrizing disease progressed significantly after starting dupilumab, and then stabilized after dupilumab was discontinued. Case 2 is a 72 year-old male who presented with bilateral cicatrizing conjunctivitis. His symptoms of ocular erythema and irritation started shortly after initiating dupilumab for atopic dermatitis. The dupilumab was discontinued and the patient's symptoms resolved and ocular surface scarring stabilized. Case 3 is a 47 year-old male with a history of allergic conjunctivitis who was found to have new onset unilateral symblepharon approximately 12 months after starting dupilumab for atopic dermatitis. The dupilumab was discontinued and his ocular disease stabilized. However, his cutaneous symptoms worsened significantly, so dupilumab was restarted at half the previous dose. His atopic dermatitis symptoms improved and cicatrizing conjunctivitis remained stable on this regimen.

Conclusions and importance

Cicatrizing conjunctivitis with symblepharon formation distinct from ocular cicactricial pemphigoid is a potential side effect of dupilumab therapy for atopic dermatitis. Progression of the cicatrization appears to halt with discontinuation, or potentially dose reduction, of dupilumab.

Characterising the chronicity of dupilumab-associated ocular surface disease: an analysis of a retrospective case series

Background/aims

To describe the clinical presentation and treatment response of dupilumab-associated ocular surface disease (DAOSD).

Methods

This is a retrospective case series of atopic dermatitis patients with DAOSD treated with dupilumab. All consecutive patients with atopic dermatitis referred by dermatologists for suspicion of DAOSD between May 2018 and June 2020 were systemically assessed by a single ophthalmologist. Presenting signs of DAOSD, duration of treatment and associated response are described.

Results

Twenty-eight patients had DAOSD during the study period. Average age was 45.6±14.8 years and 13 (46%) were female. Average follow-up was 15±10 months. Most presentations consisted in diffuse, inflammatory conjunctivitis (n=19, 68%). Other signs included peripheral corneal infiltrates (n=7, 25%), limbal nodules (n=7, 25%) and dry eye syndrome (n=6, 21%). To control ocular symptoms, tapering of corticosteroid eyedrops was slow: taper duration of strong and mild corticosteroid eyedrops averaged 10±8 weeks and 49±34 weeks, respectively. Four patients (14%) required an increase of corticosteroid eyedrops during taper due to clinical deterioration. Corticosteroid eyedrops were still required at final follow-up among 10 patients (36%). Dupilumab was temporarily stopped in 3 patients (11%), one of which did not wish to resume dupilumab for unrelated reasons. Symptomatic improvement and/or complete resolution was achieved in 25/26 patients at follow-up (96%) with empirical treatment.

Conclusions

DAOSD may follow the course of a chronic illness. Long-term corticosteroid eyedrops were required in many patients and when taper was possible, this was done after a prolonged treatment duration. Most patients’ ocular symptoms could be controlled, allowing dupilumab continuation.

Dupilumab-induced ocular surface disease: a primer

The management of atopic diseases has been revolutionised by precision therapies and biological drugs that target specific immune proteins. This report elucidates a unique complication from the use of the monoclonal antibody, dupilumab, that primary care providers and subspecialists need to be aware of. A patient in her 40s consulted us for severe atopic asthma, food allergy and eczema involving the face and body. She had previously failed treatments and was started on dupilumab (which binds to the interleukin-4 [IL4] receptor and inhibits both IL-4 and IL-13). She quickly achieved remission of asthma, rhinitis and eczema. Therapy was, however, complicated by severe blepharoconjunctivitis, dry eyes and periorbital dermatitis, consistent with dupilumab-induced ocular surface disease and dupilumab-associated mucin deficiency. Following aggressive treatment of ocular disease, the patient was able to continue dupilumab injections for asthma and eczema. It is presumed that dupilumab-induced cytokine imbalance results in ocular goblet cell dysfunction, mucin deficiency and ocular disease.

Th2 IL-4/IL-13 dual blockade with Dupilumab is linked to some Emergent Th17 type Diseases including seronegative arthritis, enthesitis/enthesopathy, but not humoral autoimmune diseases

Dupilumab, an IL-4/IL-13 receptor blocker, has been linked to emergent seronegative inflammatory arthritis and psoriasis that form part of the spondyloarthropathy (SpA) spectrum. We systematically investigated patterns of immune disorders including predominantly Th17- (SpA pattern), Th2-mediated disorders and humoral autoimmune pattern diseases, using VigiBase, the World Health Organization's (WHO) global pharmacovigilance of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Several bioinformatics databases and repositories were mined to couple Dupilumab-related immune-pharmacovigilance with molecular cascades relevant to reported findings. 37,848 Dupilumab ADR cases were reported, with skin, eye, musculoskeletal systems most affected. Seronegative arthritis (OR 9.61) psoriasis (OR 1.48), enthesitis/enthesopathy (OR 12.65), and iridocyclitis (OR 3.77) were highly associated. However, Ankylosing Spondylitis and IBD were not conclusively associated. Overall, classic polygenic humorally-mediated autoimmune diseases such as RA and SLE were not associated with Dupilumab use. Pathway analysis identified several biological pathways potentially involved in Dupilumab-associated ADRs, including the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR; in particular, FGFR2) pathway. miRNAs analysis revealed the potential involvement of hsa-miR-21-5p and hsa-miR-335-5p. In conclusion, IL-4/IL-13 blockers are not unexpectedly protective against humoral autoimmune diseases but dynamically skew immune responses towards some IL-23/IL-17 cytokine pathway-related diseases. A robust signal potentially towards degenerative related pathology in the eye and vasculature due to loss of IL-4/IL-13 tissue reparative homeostatic mechanisms emerged.

Dupilumab-associated ocular manifestations: A review of clinical presentations and management

Dupilumab is a first-in-class biologic approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) for the treatment of multiple atopic diseases, including atopic dermatitis, asthma, and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis. Since gaining traction as an effective treatment modality, multiple reports have highlighted the many ocular side effects associated with dupilumab usage. These range from mild diseases such as conjunctivitis, dry eyes, and blepharitis, to more severe manifestations such as intraocular inflammation and cicatrising conjunctivitis. The pathogenesis behind these manifestations remains controversial but are likely multi-factorial. We review the current evidence surrounding ocular manifestations of dupilumab-associated disease and proposed treatments to provide an overview of this unique disease entity. With increasing usage of dupilumab, formal recommendations regarding the treatment of dupilumab-associated ocular disease are warranted to provide standardised clinical guidance. Furthermore, it is important for healthcare practitioners to remain abreast with existing literature to adequately counsel and empower patients with the knowledge surrounding contemporary treatments for atopic diseases and their associated side-effects.

Dupilumab ocular side effects in patients with atopic dermatitis: a systematic review

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory skin disorder that most frequently occurs in children, but it can also affect adults. Even though most AD cases can be managed with topical treatments, moderate-to-severe forms require systemic therapies. Dupilumab is the first human monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of AD. Its action is through IL-4 receptor alpha subunit inhibition, thus blocking IL-4 and IL-13 signaling pathways. It has been shown to be an effective, well tolerated therapy for AD, as well as for asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). However, an increasing incidence of Dupilumab-induced ocular surface disease (DIOSD) has been reported in patients treated with Dupilumab, as compared to placebo. The aim of this study was to summarize scientific data regarding DIOSD in AD patients treated with Dupilumab. A search of PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov databases was performed. There was no limit to study design. All AD cases were moderate-to-severe. DIOSD was either dermatologist-, allergist-, or ophtalmologist-assessed. Evidence shows that DIOSD occurs most frequently in patients with atopic dermatitis and not in other skin conditions, neither in patients with asthma, CRSwNP, nor EoE who are on Dupilumab treatment. Further studies are warranted in order to establish a causal relationship between Dupilumab and ocular surface disease. Nevertheless, ophtalmological evaluations prior to Dupilumab initiation can benefit AD patients with previous ocular pathology or current ocular symptomatology. Also, patch testing for ocular allergic contact dermatitis might be advantageous in patients with a history of allergic conjunctivitis. Furthermore, TARC, IgE and circulating eosinophils levels might be important biomarkers for a baseline assessment of future candidates to Dupilumab treatment. However, TARC measurements should be resumed for research purposes only.

Practical Management of Patients with Atopic Dermatitis on Dupilumab

INTRODUCTION

Dupilumab is approved to treat moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in several countries in patients as young as 6 years of age. Since its approval, practical issues related to the use of dupilumab for AD have arisen, with particular interest in transitioning from current therapies and managing medication overlap, considerations for special populations of patients with AD, and management of potential adverse events.

METHODS

This article aims to review the literature addressing several practical management issues related to dupilumab use for AD and to provide a framework for clinical decision-making in these circumstances and sub-populations. Each statement was reviewed, revised and voted on by authors to provide their level of agreement and degree of uncertainty for each statement.

RESULTS

An agreement level > 80% was achieved for all of the statements.

CONCLUSION

The expert panel provides statements considering the practical management of patients with AD taking dupilumab to inform clinical decision-making in specific but frequently encountered clinical situations.

Corneal Perforation in Patients Under Treatment With Dupilumab for Atopic Dermatitis

Purpose

We report, for the first time, 2 cases of corneal ulceration and perforation after treatment with dupilumab for atopic dermatitis.

Methods

A 30-year-old woman and a 44-year-old man developed unilateral severe corneal ulceration and perforation while on dupilumab therapy after 3 and 9 months, respectively.

Results

Corneal cultures were negative in both cases except for scanty growth of Staphylococcus species on enrichment. Both cases progressed to perforation despite intensive topical antibiotic treatment. The first case required a tectonic keratoplasty to restore globe integrity after failed attempts of corneal gluing and multilayer amniotic membrane transplantation, and the second case was managed successfully with a cyanoacrylate glue patch.

Conclusions

Although there have been previous reports of conjunctival injection and dry eye after dupilumab, these are the first 2 reports of corneal ulceration with rapid progression to perforation in patients under treatment with dupilumab. The underlying pathophysiology for ulcerative keratitis in these cases remains unknown, but there is no doubt that cessation of dupilumab prevented progression of the melting. Severe ocular symptoms while on dupilumab require a prompt discussion with the dermatology team to potentially switch treatment and halt further keratitis progression.

New insights on ocular surface disease in patients with atopic dermatitis treated with dupilumab

Our study sought to describe ocular surface alterations at baseline and after 4 months of dupilumab treatment in patients with severe AD. Our findings highlight that all 25 patients showed ocular surface alterations prior to dupilumab treatment. Dupilumab may cause the worsening of clinical or subclinical pre-existing ocular alterations belonging to the spectrum of AKC.

Encounters and medication use for ocular surface disorders among patients treated with dupilumab: A cohort study

Background

Although dupilumab has been associated with the development of conjunctivitis, little is known about other ocular surface disorders such as dry eye and how these side effects are managed.

Objective

To evaluate the incidence and management of ocular surface disorders, including dry eye and conjunctivitis, among patients treated with dupilumab.

Methods

Using US claims data, we evaluated the incidence of encounters for ocular surface disorders among patients treated with dupilumab. Secondary outcomes included ophthalmic medication use. A propensity score matched, active-comparator, new-user cohort design was used to compare the incidence of ocular surface disorders between those starting dupilumab versus methotrexate.

Results

Among those with a history of atopic dermatitis, encounters for ocular surface disorders were more common in the 6 months after starting dupilumab than in the 6 months prior (11.7% versus 8.7%, P < .001); 59.7% of those with a new ocular surface disorder diagnosis filled a prescription for an ophthalmic medication. The incidence of ocular surface disorders was higher among those treated with dupilumab than that in those treated with methotrexate (odds ratio 1.64; 95% confidence interval 1.17-2.30).

Limitations

Observational design.

Conclusions

Dupilumab use for atopic dermatitis was associated with an increased risk of ocular surface disorders. Most patients who developed an ocular surface disorder received a prescription for an ophthalmic medication.

Ocular surface disorders associated with the use of dupilumab based on WHO VigiBase

Dupilumab is a dual inhibitor of interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 and is mainly used to treat moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Post-marketing safety data related to dupilumab have been accumulated, and it has been found that ocular surface diseases are closely associated with dupilumab treatment. The aim of this study was to detect dupilumab-related signals and to determine the safety characteristics of dupilumab with respect to eye disorders using real-world big data. Data on dupilumab use until December 29, 2019 were collected. The data were mined by calculating three indices: proportional reporting ratios, reporting odds ratios, and information components. The detected signals were classified using the primary system organ class in MedDRA terminology. Among 21,161,249 reports for all drugs, 20,548 reports were recorded for dupilumab. A total of 246 signals in the preferred terms were detected for dupilumab. Among the 246 positive signals obtained, 61 signals were related to eye disorders, which accounted for the largest percentage (24.8%), and 38 signals were anatomically related to the ocular surface. Dupilumab may cause extensive eye disorders; however, the underlying mechanisms and risk factors remain unclear. Our findings may facilitate broad safety screening of dupilumab-related eye disorders using real-world big data.

Safety of dupilumab in patients with atopic dermatitis: expert opinion

Introduction: Dupilumab, the first biologic drug to be approved for the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in adolescents and adults, has shown efficacy and safety in clinical trials. Data on long-term safety is limited but crucial for pharmacovigilance. Therefore, we performed this review to evaluate available real-world data on the long-term safety of dupilumab in atopic dermatitis.Areas covered: PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched for randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs), observational studies, case series, and case reports regarding the use of dupilumab for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Adverse events were summarized and critically evaluated.Expert opinion: Atopic dermatitis patients receiving dupilumab reported ocular surface disease more often than patients receiving placebo. Real-world data show previously unreported adverse events (blood eosinophilia, rosacea-like skin lesions, weight gain), but their mechanistic association to dupilumab treatment still requires clarification. Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas occurring under the therapy with dupilumab might be unrelated to the drug use itself but long-term follow-up data of large patient cohorts is necessary to rule out such possibility. Real-world data show that dupilumab is well tolerated in atopic dermatitis; however, ocular adverse events are not rare. Registries are needed to monitor future adverse events.

Prevalence of ocular disease during dupilumab treatment for atopic dermatitis: a bicentric retrospective comparative cohort study

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab is the first human monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). Clinical trials have reported an increase of ocular side effects in patients who receive dupilumab, with a prevalence of 5-37%.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the prevalence of ocular disease between AD patients receiving dupilumab treatment and AD reference group and to study the profile of the patients who developed ocular disease secondary to dupilumab treatment.

METHODS

Efficacy outcomes were collected both at baseline and at month 4 (M4). Presence of ocular disease was recorded at M4.

RESULTS

Data from 100 patients were examined. At M4, ocular disease was significantly more frequent in the dupilumab group (36% vs. 10%, P = 0.002). Severe allergic conjunctivitis and blepharitis were significantly more frequent in the dupilumab group (30% vs. 4%, P < 0.001, and 22% vs. 2%, P = 0.004, respectively). Six of 18 patients permanently discontinued therapy.

CONCLUSION

This study observed a prevalence of 36% of ocular disease in AD patients treated with dupilumab. Additional studies are required to confirm the risk factors we found for dupilumab-associated ocular disease and to identify new ones. Consultation with an ophthalmologist before the introduction of dupilumab might limit the occurrence of complications.

Dupilumab Induced Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency

Dupilumab is a monoclonal antibody that is used for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) in adults. However, increasing reports of ocular complications including conjunctivitis and dry eye disease have been documented. In this report, we describe a case of a patient who developed limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) after prolonged Dupilumab use. A 56-year-old Caucasian male with a history of AD presented with gradual onset cloudy vision and extensive diffuse symblepharon resulting from Dupilumab treatment. He was diagnosed with cicatrizing blepharoconjunctivitis and secondary LSCD after slit lamp examination. In conclusion, LSCD secondary to cicatricial disease is a severe adverse ocular complication caused from long-term Dupilumab treatment.

Association of Dupilumab with Intraocular Inflammation

Purpose: To report four cases of uveitis after treatment with dupilumab for atopic dermatitis.Methods: Retrospective case series.Results: Data was collected from four patients with inflammation that developed after treatment with dupilumab. The first patient was thought to have developed posterior scleritis or Harada's-type disease related to her treatment with dupilumab, with recurrence of intraocular inflammation upon restarting treatment. The second patient developed anterior and intermediate uveitis as well as cystoid macular edema in her right eye about two years after starting dupilumab treatment. The third patient developed a distinct relentless placoid chorioretinitis while on therapy with dupilumab. The fourth patient developed bilateral cystoid macular edema while on treatment with dupilumab.Conclusion: We report a case series of patients treated with dupilumab who developed intraocular manifestations of inflammatory disease.

Selective IL-13 inhibitors for the treatment of atopic dermatitis

Background

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is one of the most common chronic inflammatory skin diseases worldwide. AD pathogenesis is multifactorial, involving environmental and genetic factors. IL-13 stands out as one of the main cytokines in the pathophysiology of AD. Currently, dupilumab, which targets both IL-4 and IL-13 signalling, is the only biologic agent approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD. New targeted biologic therapies are being developed, such as lebrikizumab and tralokinumab, two selective IL-13 inhibitors. This article reviews the role of IL-13 in AD and the most recent data on lebrikizumab and tralokinumab.

Methods

A narrative review of the literature was written after retrieving relevant articles in the PubMed database (up until December 2020) using the following keywords present in the title, abstract or body: atopic dermatitis; interleukin 13; IL-13; tralokinumab; lebrikizumab, biologic therapy.

Discussion

A phase IIb trial showed that all three dosing regimens evaluated (lebrikizumab 125 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W), 250 mg Q4W or 250 mg every 2 weeks) achieved rapid and dose-dependent efficacy concerning the signs and symptoms of AD, with a statistically significant improvement, at week 16. Tralokinumab was studied in three phase III clinical trials and reached its primary endpoints at week 16 (ECZTRA 1 and 2 in monotherapy and ECZTRA 3 with concomitant topical corticosteroids), with response maintained over time. Both lebrikizumab and tralokinumab exhibited good safety profiles in AD trials, with adverse effects usually being comparable between the control and treatment groups.

Conclusion

The evidence supports the hypothesis that selective antagonism of IL-13 is sufficient to control AD, providing an improvement in the patient’s quality of life. Therefore, the development of lebrikizumab and tralokinumab represents a new and exciting phase in the management of AD.

Dupilumab-associated ocular surface disease: presentation, management and long-term sequelae

Objectives

To determine the presenting features of ocular surface disease in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) treated with dupilumab at a tertiary, university hospital. To establish the need for treatment of dupilumab-associated ocular surface disease and report any long-term effects on the ocular surface.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients treated with dupilumab for AD between January 2017 and August 2019 was undertaken. Data were collected on demographics, incidence and type of ocular disease features, natural history and treatment.

Results

A total of 50% (14/28) patients developed ocular symptoms with a mean time of onset of 6.75 (±6.1) weeks from starting dupilumab. Of these, 69% (9/13) were diagnosed with conjunctivitis associated with cicatrisation in two patients and periorbital skin changes in four. Of these nine, four had prior history of atopic keratoconjunctivitis. All were treated with topical steroids; two required additional ciclosporin drops. In all, 67% (6/9) patients went on to have on-going ocular inflammation requiring maintenance drops at a mean of 16 (±6.9) months of follow-up. All patients had improvement in their AD severity; only one patient discontinued dupilumab due to ocular side effects.

Conclusion

The rate of dupilumab-associated ocular surface disease was 32%. Periorbital skin changes and conjunctival cicatrisation were noted in association with conjunctivitis. Ocular surface disease improved on topical steroids and ciclosporin but 67% of patients needed on-going treatment. Close liaison with an ophthalmologist should be considered in those patients who develop conjunctivitis or have a past history of severe ocular surface disease.

Efficacy and Safety of Lebrikizumab, a High-Affinity Interleukin 13 Inhibitor, in Adults With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Phase 2b Randomized Clinical Trial

Question

Is lebrikizumab, a novel, high-affinity, monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin 13 that selectively inhibits interleukin 13 signaling, efficacious and safe in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis?

Findings

Among 280 patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in this phase 2b, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial, lebrikizumab statistically significantly improved measures of clinical manifestations of atopic dermatitis, pruritus, and quality of life in a dose-dependent manner vs placebo during 16 weeks of treatment.

Meaning

Lebrikizumab was efficacious for adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis, was generally well tolerated, and had a favorable safety profile consistent with previous lebrikizumab studies; these data support the central role of interleukin 13 in the pathophysiology of atopic dermatitis.

Importance

Interleukin 13 (IL-13) is a central pathogenic mediator driving multiple features of atopic dermatitis (AD) pathophysiology.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab, a novel, high-affinity, monoclonal antibody targeting IL-13 that selectively prevents formation of the IL-13Rα1/IL-4Rα heterodimer receptor signaling complex, in adults with moderate to severe AD.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A phase 2b, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging randomized clinical trial of lebrikizumab injections every 4 weeks or every 2 weeks was conducted from January 23, 2018, to May 23, 2019, at 57 US centers. Participants were adults 18 years or older with moderate to severe AD.

Interventions

Patients were randomized 2:3:3:3 to placebo every 2 weeks or to subcutaneous injections of lebrikizumab at the following doses: 125 mg every 4 weeks (250-mg loading dose [LD]), 250 mg every 4 weeks (500-mg LD), or 250 mg every 2 weeks (500-mg LD at baseline and week 2).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was percentage change in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) (baseline to week 16). Secondary end points for week 16 included proportion of patients achieving Investigator’s Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (IGA 0/1); EASI improvement of at least 50%, 75%, or 90% from baseline; percentage change in the pruritus numeric rating scale (NRS) score; and pruritus NRS score improvement of at least 4 points. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events.

Results

A total of 280 patients (mean [SD] age, 39.3 [17.5] years; 166 [59.3%] female) were randomized to placebo (n = 52) or to lebrikizumab at doses of 125 mg every 4 weeks (n = 73), 250 mg every 4 weeks (n = 80), or 250 mg every 2 weeks (n = 75). Compared with placebo (EASI least squares mean [SD] percentage change, −41.1% [56.5%]), lebrikizumab groups showed dose-dependent, statistically significant improvement in the primary end point vs placebo at week 16: 125 mg every 4 weeks (−62.3% [37.3%], P = .02), 250 mg every 4 weeks (−69.2% [38.3%], P = .002), and 250 mg every 2 weeks (−72.1% [37.2%], P < .001). Differences vs placebo-treated patients (2 of 44 [4.5%]) in pruritus NRS improvement of at least 4 points were seen as early as day 2 in the high-dose lebrikizumab group (9 of 59 [15.3%]). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 24 of 52 placebo patients (46.2%) and in lebrikizumab patients as follows: 42 of 73 (57.5%) for 125 mg every 4 weeks, 39 of 80 (48.8%) for 250 mg every 4 weeks, and 46 of 75 (61.3%) for 250 mg every 2 weeks; most were mild to moderate and did not lead to discontinuation. Low rates of injection-site reactions (1 of 52 [1.9%] in the placebo group vs 13 of 228 [5.7%] in all lebrikizumab groups), herpesvirus infections (2 [3.8%] vs 8 [3.5%]), and conjunctivitis (0% vs 6 [2.6%]) were reported.

Conclusions and Relevance

During 16 weeks of treatment, lebrikizumab provided rapid, dose-dependent efficacy across a broad range of clinical manifestations in adult patients with moderate to severe AD and demonstrated a favorable safety profile. These data support the central role of IL-13 in AD pathophysiology. If these findings replicate in phase 3 studies, lebrikizumab may meaningfully advance the standard of care for moderate to severe AD.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03443024

The spectrum of allergic ocular diseases

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to review the pathophysiologic mechanisms, differential diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of the various manifestations of ocular allergy, with an especial focus on immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated disease.

DATA SOURCES

A PubMed search was performed to include articles, using the search terms ocular allergy and allergic conjunctivitis.

STUDY SELECTIONS

Recent and relevant human studies in the English language pertaining to our topic of study were selected. Animal studies pertaining to pathophysiology of ocular allergy were also reviewed. We focused on clinical trials, practice guidelines, reviews, and systematic reviews. In addition, case reports were reviewed if they described rare clinical presentations, disease mechanisms, or novel therapies.

RESULTS

Ocular allergy encompasses both IgE- and non-IgE-mediated disease, and the clinical severity may range from mild to sight-threatening inflammation. A comprehensive treatment regimen including education, lifestyle measures, topical therapies, and even systemic interventions may be necessary for the effective management of ocular allergies, tailored according to symptom severity.

CONCLUSION

Ocular allergy is frequently encountered by allergists and eye-care specialists, and despite progressively increasing incidence, it often remains underdiagnosed and, hence, untreated.

Bidirectional association between atopic dermatitis, conjunctivitis, and other ocular surface diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Conjunctivitis and several other ocular surface diseases (OSDs) have been linked to atopic dermatitis (AD) and its treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the association between AD, conjunctivitis, and other OSDs.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Two authors independently searched EMBASE, PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science and performed title/abstract and full-text review and data abstraction. Pooled random-effects prevalence and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated.

RESULTS

The search yielded 5719 nonduplicate articles; 134 were included in the quantitative analysis. AD was associated with conjunctivitis compared to reference individuals (OR, 2.78; 95% CI, 2.33-3.32); the prevalences of conjunctivitis in patients with AD and reference individuals were 31.7% (95% CI, 27.7-35.9) and 13.3% (95% CI, 11.0-15.7), respectively. Keratoconus (OR, 3.71; 95% CI, 1.99-6.94) and ocular herpes simplex (OR, 3.65; 95% CI 2.04-6.51) were also associated with AD.

LIMITATIONS

Disease definitions differed and often relied on self-reports. Few studies provided data concerning AD phenotype or OSDs other than conjunctivitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Conjunctivitis is the most common ocular comorbidity in AD. Signs and symptoms of conjunctivitis and other OSDs in AD may be underreported, making proactive inquiry and examination by physicians treating patients with AD important.

Dupilumab and the risk of conjunctivitis and serious infection in patients with atopic dermatitis: A propensity score-matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab is an effective treatment for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) with limited safety data in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the 6-month risk of conjunctivitis and serious infections in patients with AD who initiated dupilumab.

METHODS

In a cohort study using US claims data, we compared the risk of conjunctivitis and serious infections in patients with AD who initiated either dupilumab, methotrexate (MTX), cyclosporine, or mycophenolate. Relative risks (RRs) were computed after 1:1 propensity score matching.

RESULTS

We identified 1775 dupilumab, 1034 MTX, 186 cyclosporine, and 257 mycophenolate users. The 6-month risk for any conjunctivitis was 6.5% for dupilumab, 3.3% for MTX, 4.8% for cyclosporine, and 1.2% for mycophenolate initiators. After PS matching, the RR of any conjunctivitis was increased in dupilumab users versus MTX (RR, 2.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.47-4.08), versus cyclosporine (RR, 1.56; 95% CI, 0.69-3.50), and versus mycophenolate (RR, 7.00; 95% CI, 2.12-23.2). The risk of serious infection was 0.6% in dupilumab and 1.0% in MTX initiators (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.37-2.20).

LIMITATIONS

Analyses were based on few events, and differential surveillance is a concern.

CONCLUSIONS

Although dupilumab shows a low risk of serious infections, it is associated with a clinically meaningful increase in conjunctivitis that needs to be managed in practice.

Real-world evidence of dupilumab efficacy and risk of adverse events: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab, the first biological drug to be approved for the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in adolescents and adults, has shown good efficacy and safety in clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate real-world data on the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in atopic dermatitis.

METHODS

PubMed and EMBASE were searched for observational studies with data on efficacy, drug survival, and safety of dupilumab for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Primary outcomes were mean percentage change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score and proportion of atopic dermatitis patients achieving 50%, 75%, and 90% improvement in EASI score after dupilumab therapy.

RESULTS

Twenty-two unique studies encompassing 3303 atopic dermatitis patients were included. After 16 weeks of dupilumab therapy, the pooled proportion of patients achieving 50%, 75%, and 90% EASI score improvement was 85.1%, 59.8%, and 26.8%, respectively, and the weighted mean reduction in EASI score was 69.6%. Conjunctivitis was the most common adverse event, reported in a pooled proportion of 26.1%.

LIMITATIONS

Limited data in terms of size and follow-up time were available.

CONCLUSION

Real-world data show that dupilumab is a successful and well-tolerated therapy for atopic dermatitis, but ocular adverse events commonly occur. Registries are needed to monitor for adverse events.

Corneal ulceration associated with dupilumab use in a patient with atopic dermatitis

Purpose

To describe a case of corneal ulceration associated with dupilumab use for atopic dermatitis.

Observations

A patient developed an inflammatory corneal ulcer 3 weeks after starting bi-weekly intravenous dupilumab therapy. Symptoms resolved with topical prednisolone and discontinuation of the systemic therapy with dupilumab.

Conclusion and importance

Dupilumab is known to cause ocular surface inflammation, but we report a novel association between dupilumab use and potentially sight-threatening corneal ulceration.

Dupilumab-Associated Blepharoconjunctivitis with Giant Papillae

Purpose

To describe a case of severe dupilumab-associated blepharoconjunctivitis with giant papillae treated with high potency corticosteroid eyedrops, without discontinuing or reducing dupilumab therapy.

Case Report

A 22-year-old Latin American female with a long history of severe atopic dermatitis (AD) with no ocular involvement presented 20 weeks after starting treatment with dupilumab injections with blurry vision, multiple chalazia, eyelid swelling and severe conjunctival injection in both eyes. She also reports having a hordeolum 2 months prior and severely dry eyes starting 2 weeks prior. Slit-lamp examination revealed severe conjunctivitis with macroscopically visible giant papillae in the right lower tarsal conjunctiva. The diagnosis of severe dupilumab-associated blepharoconjunctivitis was made and difluprednate 0.05% eyedrops two times a day for 7 days was initiated. Given the severity of her AD and her marked skin improvement with dupilumab, it was decided to continue dupilumab without reducing the dose. At 2-day follow-up, conjunctival injection had markedly improved, and at 2-month follow-up, her examination was unremarkable. Currently, our patient only uses dexamethasone 0.1% drops few times a week as per needed for occasional eye irritation.

Conclusion

As dupilumab injections begin to claim a rightful place in medicine, the ophthalmic community may start encountering dupilumab-associated ocular surface disease all more often and potentially play an important role in identifying, characterizing and treating the adverse ocular effects from this novel medication.

Incidence and risk factors for dupilumab associated ocular adverse events: a real-life prospective study

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab is approved for use in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) and as an add-on maintenance treatment in patients suffering from severe asthma with type 2 inflammation. Ocular adverse events (OAEs) have been reported with dupilumab almost exclusively in patients treated for AD.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to describe the incidence and nature of dupilumab-induced OAEs and to assess the potential predisposing factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective, single-centre, real-life study in adult AD patients treated with dupilumab, who were systematically examined by an ophthalmologist before and during treatment.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were included prospectively with a median age of 41.1 years and a median initial SCOring Atopic Dermatitis of 46.0 (IQR: 34.5-55.5). OAEs concerned 34.8% of patients and were mostly of mild to moderate severity. Two patients had to discontinue treatment due to OAE. The majority of patients developed or aggravated dry eye disease, with superficial punctate keratitis (SPK). Six patients developed conjunctivitis. Dupilumab-induced OAEs were associated with the following pre-existing parameters: dry eye disease with SPK (Odds ratio (OR); 6.3 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3-31.6]), eyelid eczema (OR: 8.7 [95%CI: 1.8-40.6]), history of food allergy (OR 3.8 (95% CI: 1.002-14,070) and IgE serum level> 1000 kU/L (OR:10.6 [CI 95%: 1.2-91.3]).

CONCLUSION

Atopic dermatitis patients with eyelid eczema or dry eye disease symptoms may be referred to an ophthalmologist before starting dupilumab to consider initiating preventive eye hydration measures. Further multicentric and translational studies are warranted to better explain OAEs pathophysiology.