Self-reported neighborhood stressors and sleep quality among Puerto Rican young adults

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between changes in self-reported neighborhood stressors and sleep quality and determine whether this varied by sociocultural context among Puerto Rican young adults.

METHODS

Data come from the Boricua Youth Study Health Assessment, a sample of Puerto Rican young adults from San Juan, Puerto Rico, and South Bronx, New York (n = 818; mean age=22.9years). Sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Neighborhood social stressors (disorder, social cohesion, and safety) were parent-reported in childhood and self-reported in young adulthood and categorized into: low in childhood/young adulthood (reference group), high in childhood/low in young adulthood, low in childhood/high in young adulthood, and high in childhood/young adulthood. Sociocultural context was based on participant residence during childhood (San Juan vs. South Bronx).

RESULTS

Adjusting for sociodemographic factors, living with high neighborhood stressors in both childhood and young adulthood (prevalence ratios=1.30, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.66) was associated with overall poor sleep (PSQI score >5). Among PSQI components, living with high neighborhood stressors in young adulthood only or in both time periods was associated with worse subjective sleep quality and daytime dysfunction. Additionally, there were various associations between the neighborhood stressor measures and PSQI components. Results did not differ by sociocultural context.

CONCLUSION

Findings suggest that living with high levels of neighborhood stressors during childhood and young adulthood may have a cumulative adverse impact on sleep quality in young adulthood.

Adverse Childhood Experiences and Sleep Disturbances Among Puerto Rican Young Adults

Importance

Sleep quality is a known marker of overall health. Studies suggest that adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are associated with sleep disturbances among children and adults.

Objective

To examine the association of retrospective and prospective ACEs with sleep quality among a cohort of Puerto Rican young adults from 2 sociocultural contexts.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective cohort study used data from the Boricua Youth Study (BYS), a population-based study representing Puerto Rican children from the South Bronx, New York, and Puerto Rico conducted from August 2000 to August 2003. Participants who were 5 to 9 years of age at enrollment in the BYS and who participated in wave 4 of the BYS took part in the Health Assessment (HA) when they were 18 to 29 years of age, from April 2013 to August 2017. Of the eligible 982 participants, 813 (82.8%) participated in the HA. Statistical analysis was conducted from January 2023 to January 2024.

Exposures

Prospective ACEs measured from parent and youth responses and retrospective ACEs measured among young adults using questions from the validated ACE questionnaire from the original ACEs study conducted by Kaiser Permanente and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and published in 1998. Analysis included 8 overlapping items from both questionnaires.

Outcomes

Sleep quality was assessed in the HA with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. The summary score included 7 components of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. The hypothesis was formulated after data collection. Sleep quality information was gathered at the same time as retrospective ACEs in the HA.

Results

Of the 813 participants, 438 (53.9%) lived in Puerto Rico as children, 411 (50.6%) identified as female, and the mean (SE) age of participants was 22.9 (0.07) years. After adjusting for sociodemographic factors, retrospective ACEs had a significant association with worse sleep outcomes (β [SE] = 0.29 [0.07]; 95% CI, 0.15-0.44; P < .001). Prospective ACEs did not have a significant association with sleep quality, after adjusting for sociodemographic factors (β [SE] = 0.05 [0.10]; 95% CI, -0.14 to 0.24; P = .59).

Conclusions and Relevance

This study suggests that there is a significant association between retrospective ACEs and sleep quality among Puerto Rican young adults, after adjusting for sociodemographic factors. Prospective ACEs were not significantly associated with sleep disturbances, after adjusting for sociodemographic factors. Addressing ACEs reported in young adulthood may help reduce sleep disorders.

Prevalence of cardiometabolic risk and health factors among Puerto Rican young adults in the Boricua Youth Study - Health Assessment

We describe and compare the prevalence of cardiometabolic risk factors and ideal cardiovascular health (CVH) among Puerto Rican young adults in the San Juan metro area in Puerto Rico and the South Bronx, NY. As part of the Boricua Youth Study - Health Assessment, (mean age 23 ± 0.1 years) objective anthropometric, blood pressure and blood samples were collected. Information on diet, physical activity and sleep were collected via surveys. Life's Essential 8 metrics were characterized as continuous with higher scores indicating more optimal CVH and categorically (80-100 scores for ideal CVH). Mean CVH score among NY participants was lower (61.9) than in PR (68.9). No participant had all ideal health metrics, 36% of participants in PR had 5 or more ideal CVH; while only 16% in NY met this criterion. The prevalence of cardiometabolic risk factors was high for obesity (35% in NY, 19% in PR) and diabetes (17% NY, 20% PR). In this ethnically homogenous population, we found low levels of ideal CVH that varied across study site, suggesting differences by sociocultural context. Interventions to maintain and improve CVH across the life course, tailored to sociocultural environments, are necessary for the prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Statin Eligibility and Prescribing Across Racial, Ethnic, and Language Groups over the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline Change: a Retrospective Cohort Analysis from 2009 to 2018

BACKGROUND

It is uncertain if the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) 2013 guidelines for the use of HMGCoA reductase inhibitors (statins) were associated with increased statin eligibility and prescribing across underserved groups.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze, by race, ethnicity, and preferred language, patients with indications for and presence of a statin prescription before and after the guideline change.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Multistate community health center (CHC) network with linked electronic health records.

PATIENTS

Low-income patients aged ≥ 50 with a primary care visit in 2009-2013 or 2014-2018.

MAIN MEASURES

(1) Odds of each race/ethnicity/language group meeting statin eligibility via the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines in 2009-2013 or the ACC/AHA guidelines in 2014-2018. (2) Among those eligible, odds of each group in each period with a statin prescription.

KEY RESULTS

In 2009-2013 (n = 109,330), non-English-preferring Latino (OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.03, 1.17), White (OR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.16, 1.72), and Black patients (OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.11, 1.42), were more likely than English-preferring non-Hispanic Whites to meet guideline criteria for statins. Non-English-preferring Black patients, when eligible, were no more likely than non-Hispanic Whites to have statin prescriptions (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.88, 1.54). In 2014-2018 (n = 319,904), English-preferring Latino patients (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.96-1.07) and non-English-preferring Black patients (OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.98, 1.19) had similar odds of statin prescription to English-preferring non-Hispanic White patients. English-preferring Black patients were less likely (OR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.91-0.99) to have a prescription than English-preferring non-Hispanic Whites.

CONCLUSION

Across the 2013 ACC/AHA guideline change in CHCs serving low-income patients, non-English-preferring patients were consistently more likely to be eligible for and have been prescribed statins. English-preferring Latino and English-preferring Black patients experienced reduced prescribing, comparatively, after the guideline change. Further work should explore the contextual factors that may influence guideline effectiveness and care equity.

Receiving hemodialysis in Hispanic ethnic dense communities is associated with better adherence and outcomes among young patients: a retrospective analysis of the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study

BACKGROUND

Hispanic ethnic density (HED) is a marker of better health outcomes among Hispanic patients with chronic disease. It is unclear whether community HED is associated with mortality risk among ethnically diverse patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients in the United States cohort of the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) database (2011-2015) was conducted (n = 4226). DOPPS data was linked to the American Community Survey database by dialysis facility zip code to obtain % Hispanic residents (HED). One way ANOVA and Kruskal Wallis tests were used to estimate the association between tertiles of HED with individual demographic, clinical and adherence characteristics, and facility and community attributes. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the mortality hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CIs by tertile of HED, stratified by age; a sandwich estimator was used to account for facility clustering.

RESULTS

Patients dialyzing in facilities located in the highest HED tertile communities were younger (61.4 vs. 64.4 years), more commonly non-White (62.4% vs. 22.1%), had fewer comorbidities, longer dialysis vintage, and were more adherent to dialysis treatment, but had fewer minutes of dialysis prescribed than those in the lowest tertile. Dialyzing in the highest HED tertile was associated with lower hazard of mortality (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72-1.00), but this association attenuated with the addition of individual race/ethnicity (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.78-1.09). In multivariable age-stratified analyses, those younger than 64 showed a lower hazard for mortality in the highest (vs. lowest) HED tertile (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49-0.90). Null associations were observed among patients ≥ 64 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Treating in communities with greater HED and racial/ethnic integration was associated with lower mortality among younger patients which points to neighborhood context and social cohesion as potential drivers of improved survival outcomes for patients receiving hemodialysis.

Pre-Heart Failure Longitudinal Change in a Hispanic/Latino Population-Based Study: Insights From the Echocardiographic Study of Latinos

BACKGROUND

Pre-heart failure (pre-HF) is an entity known to progress to symptomatic heart failure (HF).

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to characterize pre-HF prevalence and incidence among Hispanics/Latinos.

METHODS

The Echo-SOL (Echocardiographic Study of Latinos) assessed cardiac parameters on 1,643 Hispanics/Latinos at baseline and 4.3 years later. Prevalent pre-HF was defined as the presence of any abnormal cardiac parameter (left ventricular [LV] ejection fraction <50%; absolute global longitudinal strain <15%; grade 1 or more diastolic dysfunction; LV mass index >115 g/m2 for men, >95 g/m2 for women; or relative wall thickness >0.42). Incident pre-HF was defined among those without pre-HF at baseline. Sampling weights and survey statistics were used.

RESULTS

Among this study population (mean age: 56.4 years; 56% female), HF risk factors, including prevalence of hypertension and diabetes, worsened during follow-up. Significant worsening of all cardiac parameters (except LV ejection fraction) was evidenced from baseline to follow-up (all P < 0.01). Overall, the prevalence of pre-HF was 66.7% at baseline and the incidence of pre-HF during follow-up was 66.3%. Prevalent and incident pre-HF were seen more with increasing baseline HF risk factor burden as well as with older age. In addition, increasing the number of HF risk factors increased the risk of prevalence of pre-HF and incidence of pre-HF (adjusted OR: 1.36 [95% CI: 1.16-1.58], and adjusted OR: 1.29 [95% CI: 1.00-1.68], respectively). Prevalent pre-HF was associated with incident clinical HF (HR: 10.9 [95% CI: 2.1-56.3]).

CONCLUSIONS

Hispanics/Latinos exhibited significant worsening of pre-HF characteristics over time. Prevalence and incidence of pre-HF are high and are associated with increasing HF risk factor burden and with incidence of cardiac events.

Prevalence of electronic cigarette use and its determinants in us persons of Hispanic/Latino background: The Hispanic community health study / study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL)

Objective

To determine the prevalence and determinants of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) use among Hispanic/Latino adults from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL).

Methods

Cross-sectional data collected between the years 2015-2017 were analyzed to assess ENDS use (ever (current: use ≤ past 30 days; former: use > past 30 days) and never) among 11,623 adults (mean age 47 years±0.3 years; 52% women). Weighted prevalence estimates were reported, and age-adjusted logistic regression models were used to examine associations between sociodemographic and clinical exposures with ENDS use.

Results

The prevalence of current and former ENDS use was 2.0% and 10.4%, respectively. Having ever used ENDS was associated with prevalent coronary artery disease. Current ENDS use was higher in males and associated with higher education, English language preference, and Puerto Rican background compared with nonsmokers and cigarette-only smokers (all p<0.05).

Conclusions

Hispanic/Latino individuals who are young adults, male, US-born, and have high acculturation were more likely to report current ENDS use. These findings could inform preventive and regulatory interventions targeted to Hispanics/Latinos.

Abstract P266: Complex Patterns of Early Life Adversity Vary by Gender: Associations With Cardiometabolic Health and Pre-Heart Failure Among Hispanics/Latinos in the Midlife

Background: Early life adversities (ELA) are known risk factors for cardiovascular disease, but less understood is how distinct configurations of ELA impart differential risks for cardiometabolic health and heart failure (HF) in adulthood.

Objective: To determine distinct profiles of ELA and assess whether there are associations between the resultant profiles and multiple indicators of cardiometabolic disease and pre-HF among Hispanic/Latino adults.

Methods: Data from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos SCAS and ECHO-SOL (N=1143, mean age 55.9±0.4 years, 58.2% female) were used. Latent class analysis was used to identify the optimal number of classes characterizing ELA co-occurrence overall and by gender. Prevalent pre-HF was defined as systolic dysfunction (left ventricular (LF) ejection fraction <50%/ global longitudinal strain >15%) or diastolic dysfunction (≥ Grade 1) or LV remodeling (LV mass index >115 for males, >95 for females/ relative wall thickness >0.42). Weighted multivariable logit models were used to examine associations.

Results: The best fitting latent classes and characterization are shown in Figure 1. By gender, ELA profiles were associated with cardiometabolic factors. E.g., females with high adversity had greater odds of obesity than those with a low adversity (OR=2.27, 95% CI: 1.39 - 3.72). Alternatively, males experiencing household dysfunction had lower odds of high cholesterol than those with low adversity (OR=0.39, 95% CI: 0.19 - 0.80). Associations were not explained by age, childhood economic hardship, nativity, and Hispanic/Latino background. ELA profiles were not associated with pre-HF (e.g., high adversity OR=0.60, household dysfunction OR=0.75; all p>0.05).

Conclusions: Distinct patterns of ELA among Hispanic/Latino adults vary by gender; females experience more complex and varied patterns of adversity. Exposure to specific patterns of ELA were associated with several cardiometabolic outcomes, but no associations were found with any measures of pre-HF.

Abstract P181: Impact of Blood Pressure on Longitudinal Patterns of Pre-Heart Failure in a Hispanic/Latino Population-Based Cohort: Results From the Echocardiographic Study of Latinos (ECHO SOL)

Introduction: Hypertension (HTN) is a modifiable risk factor for heart failure (HF) and a common antecedent for pre-HF, but its effect on pre-HF is not well known.

Hypothesis: Variations in blood pressure (BP) will be related to distinct patterns of pre-HF (prevalent and incident).

Methods: Two echocardiograms were performed ∼4.3 years apart on 1643 adults in the Hispanic/Latino cohort ECHO SOL. Pre-HF was defined as systolic dysfunction (LVEF <50%/ global longitudinal strain >15%) or diastolic dysfunction (≥ Grade 1) or left ventricular remodeling (left ventricular mass index >115 for men, >95 for women/ relative wall thickness >0.42). At visit 1 (V1), 953 were normotensives, and 690 hypertensives [controlled and uncontrolled]. Groups were subdivided at visit 2 (V2) based on maintenance or changes from V1 BP status. Logistic regression models were used to determine the association of BP with pre-HF. All analyses were weighted due to complex survey design.

Results: Higher BP at baseline (linear and by tertiles) was significantly associated with prevalent pre HF (table 1). Higher pulse pressure was significantly associated with incident pre-HF (table 1). Normotensives at V1 who later developed HTN (≥ 130/80 mmHg) at V2 had higher odds of having prevalent (2.05 [95% CI, 1.24 - 3.39]) and incident (2.42 [95% CI, 1.07 - 5.51]) pre-HF than those who remained with BP <130/80 mmHg at V2. When defining uncontrolled HTN as BP ≥ 130/80 mmHg, we found that uncontrolled hypertensives at V1 who remained uncontrolled at V2 had higher odds (2.75 [95% CI, 1.18 - 6.41]) of having prevalent pre-HF compared to uncontrolled hypertensives who progressed to controlled HTN at V2 (<130/80 mmHg).

Conclusion A significant association exists between BP and prevalent/incident pre-HF in the Hispanic/Latino population. Additionally, those who progress from normal BP to hypertension face an increased risk of developing prevalent/incident pre-HF compared to those who remain normotensives. Blood pressure control of <130/80 mmHg could result in less prevalent pre-HF.

Racial, ethnic, and language differences in screening measures for statin therapy following a major guideline change

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) disproportionally affects racial and ethnic minority populations. Statin prescribing guidelines changed in 2013 to improve ASCVD prevention. It is unknown whether risk screening for statin eligibility differed across race and ethnicity over this guideline change. We examine racial/ethnic/language differences in screening measure prevalence for period-specific statin consideration using a retrospective cohort design and linked electronic health records from 635 community health centers in 24 U.S. states. Adults 50+ years, without known ASCVD, and ≥ 1 visit in 2009-2013 and/or 2014-2018 were included, grouped as: Asian, Latino, Black, or White further distinguished by language preference. Outcomes included screening measure prevalence for statin consideration, 2009-2013: low-density lipoprotein (LDL), 2014-2018: pooled cohort equation (PCE) components age, sex, race, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, smoking status. Among patients seen both periods, change in period-specific measure prevalence was assessed. Adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors, compared to English-preferring White patients, all other groups were more likely to have LDL documented (2009-2013, n = 195,061) and all PCE components documented (2014-2018, n = 344,504). Among patients seen in both periods (n = 128,621), all groups had lower odds of PCE components versus LDL documented in the measures' respective period; English-preferring Black adults experienced a greater decline compared to English-preferring White adults (OR 0.81; 95% CI: 0.72-0.91). Racial/ethnic/language disparities in documented screening measures that guide statin therapy for ASCVD prevention were unaffected by a major guideline change advising this practice. It is important to understand whether the newer guidelines have altered disparate prescribing and morbidity/mortality for this disease.

Migration History, Language Acculturation, and Mammographic Breast Density

Background: Breast cancer incidence is lower in many U.S. ethnic minority and foreign-born population groups. Investigating whether migration and acculturation patterns in risk are reflected in disease biomarkers may help to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.Methods: We compared the distribution of breast cancer risk factors across U.S.-born white, African American and Hispanic women, and foreign-born Hispanic women (n = 477, ages 40-64 years, 287 born in Caribbean countries). We used linear regression models to examine the associations of migration history and linguistic acculturation with mammographic breast density (MBD), measured using computer-assisted methods as percent and area of dense breast tissue.Results: The distribution of most breast cancer risk factors varied by ethnicity, nativity, and age at migration. In age- and body mass index-adjusted models, U.S.-born women did not differ in average MBD according to ethnicity, but foreign-born Hispanic women had lower MBD [e.g., -4.50%; 95% confidence interval (CI), -7.12 to -1.89 lower percent density in foreign- vs. U.S.-born Hispanic women]. Lower linguistic acculturation and lower percent of life spent in the United States were also associated with lower MBD [e.g., monolingual Spanish and bilingual vs. monolingual English speakers, respectively, had 5.09% (95% CI, -8.33 to -1.85) and 3.34% (95% CI, -6.57 to -0.12) lower percent density]. Adjusting for risk factors (e.g., childhood body size, parity) attenuated some of these associations.Conclusions: Hispanic women predominantly born in Caribbean countries have lower MBD than U.S.-born women of diverse ethnic backgrounds, including U.S.-born Hispanic women of Caribbean heritage.Impact: MBD may provide insight into mechanisms driving geographic and migration variations in breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 27(5); 566-74. ©2018 AACR.

Abstract B54: Concordance between objective and perceived breast cancer risk and breast cancer worry in racially diverse and immigrant women

Appropriate risk-based screening and risk-reducing interventions are important breast cancer (BC) prevention strategies. However, evidence suggests that many women inaccurately perceive their risk of BC, and that inaccurate perceptions of BC may be associated with inappropriately high or low levels of breast cancer worry, an important factor for health preventive behavior and psychological well-being. We used concordance between objective and perceived BC risk to measure accuracy of risk perception and examined whether accurate perceived risk was associated with BC worry in a predominantly racial minority (66% Hispanic, 16% black), and immigrant (63% foreign-born) sample of women (n=366, aged 40-64 years). We collected in-person interview data on perceived BC risk using the question, “Compared to the average woman your age, would you say that you are more likely to get breast cancer, less likely, or about as likely?”, and measured BC worry using the question “How often do you worry about getting breast cancer?”, with response options ranging from rarely or never to all the time. Objective risk was assessed through calculating 5-year risk estimates from the Gail model. Using the clinical threshold of ≥ 1.67%, 11% of the sample were categorized as high-risk (hereafter clinical high-risk). We also compared women's personal 5-year risk score to that of the 5-year risk score produced by the Gail model for an average women of the same age as participants, and categorized 23% of the sample as high-risk if personal risk score was ≥0.25 greater than the average women's risk score (hereafter comparative high-risk). Women whose risk scores did not meet the above thresholds were considered average-risk. We used binary and ordinal logistic regression to examine the association of concordance of perceived and objective risk with socioedemographic factors and BC worry. The majority of women (81%) correctly perceived their risk, with the proportion of correct risk perception higher in average-risk women (87%) than in high-risk women (36%). Accurate risk perception (i.e., concordance between perceived and objective risk) was lowest in women who were U.S.-born, English-speakers, had higher health literacy and were non-Hispanic white (e.g., 55% of whites vs. 88% and 78% in Hispanic and African American women respectively had correct risk perceptions relative to clinical risk). Women with family history of BC were also more likely to have inaccurate perceived risk (57% vs. 85%). Compared to average-risk women with low perceived risk, women who perceive their BC risk to be high, regardless of their objective risk, had higher BC worry while women with low perceived risk but high objective risk had lower BC worry. After adjusting for race/ethnicity, language acculturation, education and family history, average-risk women who perceived themselves to be at higher risk continued to have statistically significantly higher odds of BC worry (OR=3.00, 95% CI:1.60-5.62 for clinical risk, and OR=3.96, 95% CI: 1.96-7.98 for comparative risk, both relative to average-risk women with low perceived risk). In conclusion, while the majority of women correctly perceived their risk for breast cancer, a substantial proportion of high-risk women inaccurately perceived themselves to be at average risk and/or lower risk than average women of the same age. High perceived risk predicted higher BC worry in both average- and high-risk women. Increasing women's knowledge of their breast cancer risk may improve inaccurate risk perception and inappropriate BC worry, and help women better appraise their risk management options.

Citation Format: Ayana K. April-Sanders, Parisa Tehranifar. Concordance between objective and perceived breast cancer risk and breast cancer worry in racially diverse and immigrant women. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Eighth AACR Conference on The Science of Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; Nov 13-16, 2015; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2016;25(3 Suppl):Abstract nr B54.