Intracranial hemorrhage in COVID-19 patients during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory failure: a nationwide register study report

Background

In severe cases, SARS-CoV-2 infection leads to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), often treated by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). During ECMO therapy, anticoagulation is crucial to prevent device-associated thrombosis and device failure, however, it is associated with bleeding complications. In COVID-19, additional pathologies, such as endotheliitis, may further increase the risk of bleeding complications. To assess the frequency of bleeding events, we analyzed data from the German COVID-19 autopsy registry (DeRegCOVID).

Methods

The electronic registry uses a web-based electronic case report form. In November 2021, the registry included N = 1129 confirmed COVID-19 autopsy cases, with data on 63 ECMO autopsy cases and 1066 non-ECMO autopsy cases, contributed from 29 German sites.

Findings

The registry data showed that ECMO was used in younger male patients and bleeding events occurred much more frequently in ECMO cases compared to non-ECMO cases (56% and 9%, respectively). Similarly, intracranial bleeding (ICB) was documented in 21% of ECMO cases and 3% of non-ECMO cases and was classified as the immediate or underlying cause of death in 78% of ECMO cases and 37% of non-ECMO cases. In ECMO cases, the three most common immediate causes of death were multi-organ failure, ARDS and ICB, and in non-ECMO cases ARDS, multi-organ failure and pulmonary bacterial ± fungal superinfection, ordered by descending frequency.

Interpretation

Our study suggests the potential value of autopsies and a joint interdisciplinary multicenter (national) approach in addressing fatal complications in COVID-19.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-022-03945-x.

Inter-observer agreement for the histological diagnosis of invasive lobular breast carcinoma

Invasive lobular breast carcinoma (ILC) is the second most common breast carcinoma (BC) subtype and is mainly driven by loss of E‐cadherin expression. Correct classification of BC as ILC is important for patient treatment. This study assessed the degree of agreement among pathologists for the diagnosis of ILC. Two sets of hormone receptor (HR)‐positive/HER2‐negative BCs were independently reviewed by participating pathologists. In set A (61 cases), participants were provided with hematoxylin/eosin (HE)‐stained sections. In set B (62 cases), participants were provided with HE‐stained sections and E‐cadherin immunohistochemistry (IHC). Tumor characteristics were balanced. Participants classified specimens as non‐lobular BC versus mixed BC versus ILC. Pairwise inter‐observer agreement and agreement with a pre‐defined reference diagnosis were determined with Cohen's kappa statistics. Subtype calls were correlated with molecular features, including CDH1/E‐cadherin mutation status. Thirty‐five pathologists completed both sets, providing 4,305 subtype calls. Pairwise inter‐observer agreement was moderate in set A (median κ = 0.58, interquartile range [IQR]: 0.48–0.66) and substantial in set B (median κ = 0.75, IQR: 0.56–0.86, p < 0.001). Agreement with the reference diagnosis was substantial in set A (median κ = 0.67, IQR: 0.57–0.75) and almost perfect in set B (median κ = 0.86, IQR: 0.73–0.93, p < 0.001). The median frequency of CDH1/E‐cadherin mutations in specimens classified as ILC was 65% in set A (IQR: 56–72%) and 73% in set B (IQR: 65–75%, p < 0.001). Cases with variable subtype calls included E‐cadherin‐positive ILCs harboring CDH1 missense mutations, and E‐cadherin‐negative ILCs with tubular elements and focal P‐cadherin expression. ILCs with trabecular growth pattern were often misclassified as non‐lobular BC in set A but not in set B. In conclusion, subtyping of BC as ILC achieves almost perfect agreement with a pre‐defined reference standard, if assessment is supported by E‐cadherin IHC. CDH1 missense mutations associated with preserved E‐cadherin protein expression, E‐ to P‐cadherin switching in ILC with tubular elements, and trabecular ILC were identified as potential sources of discordant classification.

First report from the German COVID-19 autopsy registry

Background

Autopsies are an important tool in medicine, dissecting disease pathophysiology and causes of death. In COVID-19, autopsies revealed e.g., the effects on pulmonary (micro)vasculature or the nervous system, systemic viral spread, or the interplay with the immune system. To facilitate multicentre autopsy-based studies and provide a central hub supporting autopsy centres, researchers, and data analyses and reporting, in April 2020 the German COVID-19 Autopsy Registry (DeRegCOVID) was launched.

Methods

The electronic registry uses a web-based electronic case report form. Participation is voluntary and biomaterial remains at the respective site (decentralized biobanking). As of October 2021, the registry included N=1129 autopsy cases, with 69271 single data points including information on 18674 available biospecimens gathered from 29 German sites.

Findings

In the N=1095 eligible records, the male-to-female ratio was 1·8:1, with peaks at 65-69 and 80-84 years in males and >85 years in females. The analysis of the chain of events directly leading to death revealed COVID-19 as the underlying cause of death in 86% of the autopsy cases, whereas in 14% COVID-19 was a concomitant disease. The most common immediate cause of death was diffuse alveolar damage, followed by multi-organ failure. The registry supports several scientific projects, public outreach and provides reports to the federal health authorities, leading to legislative adaptation of the German Infection Protection Act, facilitating the performance of autopsies during pandemics.

Interpretation

A national autopsy registry can provide multicentre quantitative information on COVID-19 deaths on a national level, supporting medical research, political decision-making and public discussion.

Funding

German Federal Ministries of Education and Research and Health.

Hintergrund: Obduktionen sind ein wichtiges Instrument in der Medizin, um die Pathophysiologie von Krankheiten und Todesursachen zu untersuchen. Im Rahmen von COVID-19 wurden durch Obduktionen z.B. die Auswirkungen auf die pulmonale Mikrovaskulatur, das Nervensystem, die systemische Virusausbreitung, und das Zusammenspiel mit dem Immunsystem untersucht. Um multizentrische, auf Obduktionen basierende Studien zu erleichtern und eine zentrale Anlaufstelle zu schaffen, die Obduktionszentren, Forscher sowie Datenanalysen und -berichte unterstützt, wurde im April 2020 das deutsche COVID-19-Autopsieregister (DeRegCOVID) ins Leben gerufen.

Methoden: Das elektronische Register verwendet ein webbasiertes elektronisches Fallberichtsformular. Die Teilnahme ist freiwillig und das Biomaterial verbleibt am jeweiligen Standort (dezentrales Biobanking). Im Oktober 2021 umfasste das Register N=1129 Obduktionsfälle mit 69271 einzelnen Datenpunkten, die Informationen über 18674 verfügbare Bioproben enthielten, die von 29 deutschen Standorten gesammelt wurden.

Ergebnisse: In den N=1095 ausgewerteten Datensätzen betrug das Verhältnis von Männern zu Frauen 1,8:1 mit Spitzenwerten bei 65-69 und 80-84 Jahren bei Männern und >85 Jahren bei Frauen. Die Analyse der Sequenz der unmittelbar zum Tod führenden Ereignisse ergab, dass in 86 % der Obduktionsfälle COVID-19 die zugrunde liegende Todesursache war, während in 14 % der Fälle COVID-19 eine Begleiterkrankung war. Die häufigste unmittelbare Todesursache war der diffuse Alveolarschaden, gefolgt von Multiorganversagen. Das Register unterstützt mehrere wissenschaftliche Projekte, die Öffentlichkeitsarbeit und liefert Berichte an die Bundesgesundheitsbehörden, was zu einer Anpassung des deutschen Infektionsschutzgesetzes führte und die Durchführung von Obduktionen in Pandemien erleichtert.

Interpretation: Ein nationales Obduktionsregister kann multizentrische quantitative Informationen über COVID-19-Todesfälle auf nationaler Ebene liefern und damit die medizinische Forschung, die politische Entscheidungsfindung und die öffentliche Diskussion unterstützen.

Finanzierung: Bundesministerien für Bildung und Forschung und für Gesundheit.

[Update on collaborative autopsy-based research in German pathology, neuropathology, and forensic medicine]

BACKGROUND

Autopsies are a valuable tool for understanding disease, including COVID-19.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The German Registry of COVID-19 Autopsies (DeRegCOVID), established in April 2020, serves as the electronic backbone of the National Autopsy Network (NATON), launched in early 2022 following DEFEAT PANDEMIcs.

RESULTS

The NATON consortium's interconnected, collaborative autopsy research is enabled by an unprecedented collaboration of 138 individuals at more than 35 German university and non-university autopsy centers through which pathology, neuropathology, and forensic medicine autopsy data including data on biomaterials are collected in DeRegCOVID and tissue-based research and methods development are conducted. More than 145 publications have now emerged from participating autopsy centers, highlighting various basic science and clinical aspects of COVID-19, such as thromboembolic events, organ tropism, SARS-CoV‑2 detection methods, and infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 at autopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

Participating centers have demonstrated the high value of autopsy and autopsy-derived data and biomaterials to modern medicine. The planned long-term continuation and further development of the registry and network, as well as the open and participatory design, will allow the involvement of all interested partners.

Comparison of six breast cancer classifiers using qPCR

MOTIVATION

Several gene expression-based risk scores and subtype classifiers for breast cancer were developed to distinguish high- and low-risk patients. Evaluating the performance of these classifiers helps to decide which classifiers should be used in clinical practice for personal therapeutic recommendations. So far, studies that compared multiple classifiers in large independent patient cohorts mostly used microarray measurements. qPCR-based classifiers were not included in the comparison or had to be adapted to the different experimental platforms.

RESULTS

We used a prospective study of 726 early breast cancer patients from seven certified German breast cancer centers. Patients were treated according to national guidelines and the expressions of 94 selected genes were measured by the mid-throughput qPCR platform Fluidigm. Clinical and pathological data including outcome over five years is available. Using these data, we could compare the performance of six classifiers (scmgene and research versions of PAM50, ROR-S, recurrence score, EndoPredict and GGI). Similar to other studies, we found a similar or even higher concordance between most of the classifiers and most were also able to differentiate high- and low-risk patients. The classifiers that were originally developed for microarray data still performed similarly using the Fluidigm data. Therefore, Fluidigm can be used to measure the gene expressions needed by several classifiers for a large cohort with little effort. In addition, we provide an interactive report of the results, which enables a transparent, in-depth comparison of classifiers and their prediction of individual patients.

AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION

https://services.bio.ifi.lmu.de/pia/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Abstract P4-03-01: Vacuum assisted core-needle biopsy after neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer to predict the status of pathologic response

Introduction: Neoadjuvant breast cancer therapy trials have documented impressive rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) of up to 70% and above, depending on grade, hormone receptor and HER2 receptor status and type of therapy. The purpose of our prospective single institution trial is to examine the predictive value of a standardized vacuum assisted core-needle biopsy (VAB) of the tumor site after neoadjuvant therapy with respect to pathologic response status.

Methods: From 2011-2017, all patients who had completed neoadjuvant breast cancer therapy at our institution were informed about this trial regardless of their clinical response status. In case of consent, a VAB of the clip-marked tumor site was performed directly before the operation. At least 3, in most cases 6 biopsy cylinders were obtained.

Results: A total of 113 patients completing neoadjuvant therapy consented to the trial. Four patients presented with bilateral breast cancer, resulting in 117 cases of breast cancer. The pCR rate (ypT0ypN0) was 36% (n=42). In 14 cases, the biopsy did not show any sign of residual disease, although residual disease was detected upon operation, resulting in an accuracy of 88% for correct prediction of pathologic response. Pre-operative VAB correctly predicted residual tumor in 81%. The negative predictive value was 75%.

Conclusions: Although the results of this trial are encouraging, a false negative rate of 19% is entirely insufficient. The method may be useful in guiding decisions regarding the modification of neoadjuvant therapy based on pathological response. Whether or not correct prediction of pathologic response may be improved by further standardizing the tumor marking procedure as well as better defining and increasing the volume of tissue removal by VAB should be examined in a further prospective trial. The omission of operative therapy in case of pCR in a preoperative biopsy after completion of NACT cannot be recommended.

Citation Format: Regina Große, Antonia Lebioda, Jana Saegenschnitter, Tin Dao Nguyen, Holger Zentgraf, Joerg Buchmann, Christine Fathke, Susanne Steer, Christoph Thomssen. Vacuum assisted core-needle biopsy after neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer to predict the status of pathologic response [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-03-01.

Survival of breast cancer patients in rural Ethiopia

PURPOSE

To describe the histopathological characteristics and survival of female breast cancer (BC) patients in a rural setting with limited access to adjuvant treatment.

METHODS

A prospective study of 107 histologically confirmed BC patients treated with surgery from 2010 to 2016 from rural parts of western Ethiopia. Referral pathology was performed, and active follow-up was conducted. Adjusted cox regression analysis (hazard ratio [HR]) was performed.

RESULTS

The median age at diagnosis was 45 (16-83) years; 57% of the patients presented with cT3/4 tumors, 71% with clinically positive lymph nodes, 21% with HER2-overexpression (Dako3+) and 68% with grade 3 tumors. Estrogen and/or progesterone receptor expressions were present in 66% and triple-negative disease in 25%. The estimated 1- and 2-year overall survival probability rates were 78 and 53%, respectively. The 2-year survival for patients with clinically positive lymph nodes was 44% compared to 73% for patients with lymph node-negative disease (HR 2.44; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.19-5.02). The corresponding 2-year survival for patients with cT4 tumors was 25% versus 68% for patients with cT1-2 tumors (cT1-3 vs. cT4 HR 3.86; 95% CI 1.82-13.63). The 2-year survival for patients with hormone receptor-negative disease was 40% compared to 59% for patients with hormone receptor-positive disease (HR 1.92; 95% CI 1.06-3.47).

CONCLUSION

The majority of breast cancer patients treated with surgery in rural parts of western Ethiopia are diagnosed at advanced stage and have hormone receptor-positive disease. Nearly half of the patients die within 2 years. These findings underscore the need for provision of adjuvant hormonal therapy and for the establishment of pathology service including hormone receptor testing.