1
|
Dragano N, Dortmann O, Timm J, Mohrmann M, Wehner R, Rupprecht CJ, Scheider M, Mayatepek E, Wahrendorf M. Household deprivation, comorbidities and COVID-19 hospitalization in 690,115 children/adolescents. Eur J Public Health 2022. [PMCID: PMC9593719 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Studies document that adults in disadvantaged socio-economic positions have elevated risks of a severe course of COVID-19, but it is unclear if this holds true for children. We investigate in this population-based study whether young people from socio-economically disadvantaged households in Germany had a higher risk of COVID-19 hospitalization compared with more affluent counterparts. We also examined if differences were related to comorbidities that predict severe courses in children. Methods We included data from all 690,115 children and adolescents (0-18 years) enrolled in a statutory health insurance carrier. Daily hospital diagnoses of COVID-19 were recorded from 1.1.2020 to 13.7.2021. Logistic regressions were used to compare children from households with an indication of poverty (e.g. long- or short-term unemployed) with children from households with insurance holders in regular employment. We also assessed socio-economic characteristics of the area of residence. We controlled for age, sex, days under observation, nationality, and comorbidities (e.g. obesity). Findings A COVID-19 hospital diagnosis was a rare event (n = 1637). Children of long-term unemployed parents had a 1·36 times (95% CI 1·21-1·51) higher adjusted odds of hospitalization compared with those of employed parents. Elevated odds were also found for short-term unemployed or low-wage employment. Those living in poor areas had a 3·02 (1·81-5·22) higher odds of hospitalization than those in less deprived areas. Comorbidities were strongly related to hospitalization, but their adjustment did not change main estimates for household deprivation. Discussion Results suggest that children from poor households are at higher risk of severe courses of COVID-19 than their affluent counterparts. This underlies the need to implement effective Public Health strategies to protect deprived children from COVID-19 and other infectious disease even in high income countries such as Germany. Key messages • Children and adolescents from poor families seem to be at higer risk for sever courses of COVID-19. • Comorbidities were no key mediating factor in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Dragano
- Institute of Medical Sociology, University Hospital Duesseldorf , Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - O Dortmann
- AOK Rhineland/Hamburg , Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - J Timm
- Institute of Virology, University Hospital Düsseldorf , Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - M Mohrmann
- AOK Rhineland/Hamburg , Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - R Wehner
- AOK Rhineland/Hamburg , Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - M Scheider
- AOK Rhineland/Hamburg , Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - E Mayatepek
- Department of General Pediatrics, Neonatology and Pediatric Cardiology, University Hospital Düsseldorf , Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - M Wahrendorf
- Institute of Medical Sociology, University Hospital Duesseldorf , Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dragano N, Dortmann O, Timm J, Mohrmann M, Wehner R, Rupprecht CJ, Scheider M, Mayatepek E, Wahrendorf M. Association of Household Deprivation, Comorbidities, and COVID-19 Hospitalization in Children in Germany, January 2020 to July 2021. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2234319. [PMID: 36190730 PMCID: PMC9530965 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.34319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Adults in disadvantaged socioeconomic positions have elevated risks of a severe course of COVID-19, but it is unclear whether this holds true for children. OBJECTIVE To investigate whether young people from disadvantaged households have a higher risk of COVID-19 hospitalization and whether differences were associated with comorbidities that predispose children to severe courses. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This population-based cohort study included all children and adolescents (aged 0-18 years) who were enrolled in a statutory health insurance carrier in Germany during the observation period of January 1, 2020, to July 13, 2021. Logistic regressions were calculated to compare children from households with and without an indication of poverty. Age, sex, days under observation, nationality, and comorbidities (eg, obesity, diabetes) were controlled for to account for explanatory factors. EXPOSURES Disadvantage on the household level was assessed by the employment status of the insurance holder (ie, employed, long- or short-term unemployed, low-wage employment, economically inactive). Socioeconomic characteristics of the area of residence were also assessed. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Daily hospital diagnoses of COVID-19 (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision codes U07.1 and U07.2) were recorded. Comorbidities were assessed using inpatient and outpatient diagnoses contained in the insurance records. RESULTS A total of 688 075 children and adolescents were included, with a mean (SD) age of 8.3 (5.8) years and 333 489 (48.4%) female participants. COVID-19 hospital diagnosis was a rare event (1637 participants [0.2%]). Children whose parents were long-term unemployed were 1.36 (95% CI, 1.22-1.51) times more likely than those with employed parents to be hospitalized. Elevated odds were also found for children whose parents had low-wage employment (odds ratio, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.05-1.58). Those living in low-income areas had 3.02 (95% CI, 1.73-5.28) times higher odds of hospitalization than those in less deprived areas. Comorbidities were associated with hospitalization, but their adjustment did not change main estimates for deprivation. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study, children who had parents who were unemployed and those who lived in low-income areas were at higher risk of COVID-19 hospitalization. This finding suggests that attention must be paid to children with SARS-CoV-2 from vulnerable families and closer monitoring should be considered. A number of explanatory factors, including comorbidities, were taken into account, but their analysis yielded no clear picture about underlying processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nico Dragano
- Institute of Medical Sociology, Centre for Health and Society, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, University of Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Olga Dortmann
- Department of Health Management, Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse Rhineland/Hamburg–Die Gesundheitskasse, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Jörg Timm
- Institute of Virology, Heinrich Heine University, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, University of Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Matthias Mohrmann
- Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse Rhineland/Hamburg–Die Gesundheitskasse, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Rosemarie Wehner
- Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse Rhineland/Hamburg–Die Gesundheitskasse, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Christoph J. Rupprecht
- Department of Health Policy and Health Economics, Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse Rhineland/Hamburg – Die Gesundheitskasse, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Maria Scheider
- Department of Health Management, Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse Rhineland/Hamburg–Die Gesundheitskasse, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Ertan Mayatepek
- Department of General Pediatrics, Neonatology and Pediatric Cardiology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Morten Wahrendorf
- Institute of Medical Sociology, Centre for Health and Society, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, University of Duesseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Greiner GG, Viehmann A, Linnenkamp U, Wilm S, Leve V, Neuenschwander M, Kuss O, Fehm T, Ensenauer R, Schumacher L, Lange U, Müller-Bößmann D, Lappe V, Ihle P, Adamczewski H, Kaltheuner M, Tamayo M, Gräfe V, Westerhoff B, Wallerich-Herf N, Schellhammer S, Kerres T, Schmitz-Losem I, Cramer S, Rupprecht CJ, Klüppelholz B, Meyer F, Koch-Schulte S, Jüngling U, Icks A. Study protocol for a mixed methods exploratory investigation of aftercare services for gestational diabetes in women to develop a new patient-centred model in Germany: the GestDiNa_basic study. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e046048. [PMID: 34341040 PMCID: PMC8330567 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have a higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus compared with women who never had GDM. Consequently, the question of structured aftercare for GDM has emerged. In all probability, many women do not receive care according to the guidelines. In particular, the process and interaction between obstetrical, diabetic, gynaecological, paediatric and general practitioner care lacks clear definitions. Thus, our first goal is to analyse the current aftercare situation for women with GDM in Germany, for example, the participation rate in aftercare diabetes screening, as well as reasons and attitudes stated by healthcare providers to offer these services and by patients to participate (or not). Second, we want to develop an appropriate, effective and patient-centred care model. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a population-based mixed methods study using both quantitative and qualitative research approaches. In various working packages, we evaluate data of the GestDiab register, of the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians of North Rhine and the participating insurance companies (AOK Rheinland/Hamburg, BARMER, DAK Gesundheit, IKK classic, pronova BKK). In addition, quantitative (postal surveys) and qualitative (interviews) surveys will be conducted with randomly selected healthcare providers (diabetologists, gynaecologists, paediatricians and midwives) and affected women, to be subsequently analysed. All results will then be jointly examined and evaluated. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf (Ethics Committee No.: 2019-738). Participants of the postal surveys and interviews will be informed in detail about the study and the use of data as well as the underlying data protection regulations before voluntarily participating. The study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conferences and public information. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER DRKS00020283.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory Gordon Greiner
- Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society (chs), Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
- Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Institute for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Anja Viehmann
- Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society (chs), Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
- Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Institute for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Ute Linnenkamp
- Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society (chs), Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
- Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Institute for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Stefan Wilm
- Institute of General Practice, Centre for Health and Society (chs), Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Verena Leve
- Institute of General Practice, Centre for Health and Society (chs), Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Manuela Neuenschwander
- Institute for Biometrics and Epidemiology, German Diabetes Center Leibniz Institute for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Oliver Kuss
- Institute for Biometrics and Epidemiology, German Diabetes Center Leibniz Institute for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Tanja Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Regina Ensenauer
- Institute of Child Nutrition, Max Rubner-Institute Federal Research Institute of Nutrition and Food, Karlsruhe, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- Department of General Paediatrics, Neonatology, and Paediatric Cardiology, University Children's Hospital, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Liesa Schumacher
- Department of General Paediatrics, Neonatology, and Paediatric Cardiology, University Children's Hospital, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Ute Lange
- Department of Applied Heath Sciences, Bochum University of Applied Sciences, Bochum, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Dorit Müller-Bößmann
- Department of Applied Heath Sciences, Bochum University of Applied Sciences, Bochum, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Veronika Lappe
- PMV Research Group, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Peter Ihle
- PMV Research Group, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | | | | | - Miguel Tamayo
- Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians of North Rhine (KV Nordrhein), Düsseldorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Viola Gräfe
- Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians of North Rhine (KV Nordrhein), Düsseldorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Thomas Kerres
- DAK Gesundheit, Statutory Health Insurance, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Imke Schmitz-Losem
- pronova BKK, Statutory Health Insurance, Ludwigshafen, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany
| | - Stefan Cramer
- pronova BKK, Statutory Health Insurance, Ludwigshafen, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany
| | - Christoph J Rupprecht
- AOK Rheinland/Hamburg, Statutory Health Insurance, Düsseldorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Birgit Klüppelholz
- AOK Rheinland/Hamburg, Statutory Health Insurance, Düsseldorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Frank Meyer
- IKK classic, Statutory Health Insurance, Münster, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Simone Koch-Schulte
- IKK classic, Statutory Health Insurance, Münster, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Ute Jüngling
- Patient Representative, Dortmund, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Andrea Icks
- Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society (chs), Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
- Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Institute for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research, Neuherberg, Bayern, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wahrendorf M, Rupprecht CJ, Dortmann O, Scheider M, Dragano N. [Higher risk of COVID-19 hospitalization for unemployed: an analysis of health insurance data from 1.28 million insured individuals in Germany]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2021; 64:314-321. [PMID: 33507323 PMCID: PMC7841971 DOI: 10.1007/s00103-021-03280-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Unemployment is related to poverty and is a risk factor for poor health. The present study investigates if unemployment increases the risk of COVID-19 hospitalization for men and women of working age in Germany. METHODS The study uses the health insurance data from AOK Rhineland/Hamburg (from 1 January 2020 until 18 June 2020) of 1,288,745 persons aged between 18 and 65. Four employment situations are distinguished: (1) regular employment, (2) low-wage employment with social support, (3) unemployment with receipt of unemployment benefit 1, and (4) long-term unemployment with receipt of unemployment benefit 2. COVID-19 hospitalizations are measured on the basis of the ICD codes U07.1 and U07.2 reported by the hospitals. Multiple logistic regression models are calculated (adjusted for age and sex). RESULTS During the observation period, 1521 persons had hospitalization with COVID-19 as primary or secondary diagnosis. Overall, this corresponds to a rate of 118 cases per 100,000 insured persons. Rates varied by employment situation. Compared with regularly employed persons, the odds ratio for a hospitalization was 1.94 (CI 95%: 1.74-2.15) for long-term unemployment, 1.29 (0.86-1.94) for unemployed, and 1.33 (0.98-1.82) for low-wage employment. CONCLUSION The results are in line with earlier studies from the USA and Great Britain reporting socioeconomic inequalities in COVID-19 hospitalization risk. This provides the first empirical support that socioeconomic inequalities in the severity of COVID-19 also exists in Germany.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morten Wahrendorf
- Institut für Medizinische Soziologie, Centre for Health and Society, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
| | - Christoph J Rupprecht
- Abteilung Gesundheitspolitik und Gesundheitsökonomie, AOK Rheinland/Hamburg - die Gesundheitskasse, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
| | - Olga Dortmann
- Abteilung Gesundheitspolitik und Gesundheitsökonomie, AOK Rheinland/Hamburg - die Gesundheitskasse, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
| | - Maria Scheider
- Abteilung Gesundheitspolitik und Gesundheitsökonomie, AOK Rheinland/Hamburg - die Gesundheitskasse, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
| | - Nico Dragano
- Institut für Medizinische Soziologie, Centre for Health and Society, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Andrich S, Ritschel M, Meyer G, Hoffmann F, Stephan A, Baltes M, Blessin J, Jobski K, Fassmer AM, Haastert B, Gontscharuk V, Arend W, Theunissen L, Colley D, Hinze R, Thelen S, Fuhrmann P, Sorg CGG, Windolf J, Rupprecht CJ, Icks A. Healthcare provision, functional ability and quality of life after proximal femoral fracture - 'ProFem': Study protocol of a population-based, prospective study based on individually linked survey and statutory health insurance data. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e028144. [PMID: 31243034 PMCID: PMC6597653 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Proximal femoral fractures (PFF) are among the most frequent fractures in older people. However, the situation of people with a PFF after hospital discharge is poorly understood. Our aim is to (1) analyse healthcare provision, (2) examine clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs), (3) describe clinical and sociodemographic predictors of these and (4) develop an algorithm to identify subgroups with poor outcomes and a potential need for more intensive healthcare. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a population-based prospective study based on individually linked survey and statutory health insurance (SHI) data. All people aged minimum 60 years who have been continuously insured with the AOK Rheinland/Hamburg and experience a PFF within 1 year will be consecutively included (SHI data analysis). Additionally, 700 people selected randomly from the study population will be consecutively invited to participate in the survey. Questionnaire data will be collected in the participants' private surroundings at 3, 6 and 12 months after hospital discharge. If the insured person considers themselves to be only partially or not at all able to take part in the survey, a proxy person will be interviewed where possible. SHI variables include healthcare provision, healthcare costs and clinical outcomes. Questionnaire variables include information on PROs, lifestyle characteristics and socioeconomic status. We will use multiple regression models to estimate healthcare processes and outcomes including mortality and cost, investigate predictors, perform non-responder analysis and develop an algorithm to identify vulnerable subgroups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf (approval reference 6128R). All participants including proxies providing written and informed consent can withdraw from the study at any time. The study findings will be disseminated through scientific journals and public information. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER DRKS00012554.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silke Andrich
- Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Michaela Ritschel
- Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Gabriele Meyer
- Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute for Health and Nursing Sciences, Medical Faculty, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Falk Hoffmann
- Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Astrid Stephan
- Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute for Health and Nursing Sciences, Medical Faculty, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Marion Baltes
- Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute for Health and Nursing Sciences, Medical Faculty, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Juliane Blessin
- Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute for Health and Nursing Sciences, Medical Faculty, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Kathrin Jobski
- Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Alexander M Fassmer
- Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Burkhard Haastert
- Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- mediStatistica, Neuenrade, Germany
| | - Veronika Gontscharuk
- Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Werner Arend
- Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Lena Theunissen
- Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Denise Colley
- Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Raoul Hinze
- Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Simon Thelen
- Department of Trauma and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Petra Fuhrmann
- Department Health Policy – Health Economics – Press Relations, AOK Rheinland/Hamburg, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Christian G G Sorg
- Department Health Policy – Health Economics – Press Relations, AOK Rheinland/Hamburg, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Joachim Windolf
- Department of Trauma and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Christoph J Rupprecht
- Department Health Policy – Health Economics – Press Relations, AOK Rheinland/Hamburg, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Andrea Icks
- Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
de Groot F, Capri S, Castanier JC, Cunningham D, Flamion B, Flume M, Herholz H, Levin LÅ, Solà-Morales O, Rupprecht CJ, Shalet N, Walker A, Wong O. Ethical Hurdles in the Prioritization of Oncology Care. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2017; 15:119-126. [PMID: 27766548 PMCID: PMC5343076 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-016-0288-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
With finite resources, healthcare payers must make difficult choices regarding spending and the ethical distribution of funds. Here, we describe some of the ethical issues surrounding inequity in healthcare in nine major European countries, using cancer care as an example. To identify relevant studies, we conducted a systematic literature search. The results of the literature review suggest that although prevention, access to early diagnosis, and radiotherapy are key factors associated with good outcomes in oncology, public and political attention often focusses on the availability of pharmacological treatments. In some countries this focus may divert funding towards cancer drugs, for example through specific cancer drugs funds, leading to reduced expenditure on other areas of cancer care, including prevention, and potentially on other diseases. In addition, as highly effective, expensive agents are developed, the use of value-based approaches may lead to unacceptable impacts on health budgets, leading to a potential need to re-evaluate current cost-effectiveness thresholds. We anticipate that the question of how to fund new therapies equitably will become even more challenging in the future, with the advent of expensive, innovative, breakthrough treatments in other therapeutic areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Folkert de Groot
- ToendersdeGroot B.V, Boomstede 281, 3608 AN, Maarssen, The Netherlands.
| | - Stefano Capri
- School of Economics and Management, LIUC University, Castellanza, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Mathias Flume
- Kassenärztliche Vereinigung Westfalen Lippe, Dortmund, Germany
| | | | - Lars-Åke Levin
- Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lüngen M, Rupprecht CJ, Plamper E, Lauterbach KW. [Centralisation of breast cancer management by giving minimum work-load. Empirical effects in the region of North-Rhine, Germany]. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich 2004; 98:385-9. [PMID: 15487385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The concentration of treatment on a few hospitals is discussed to improve the outcome of care. For the treatment of the breast cancer the distributional effects are evaluated. METHOD A systematic literature search in Medline identified six studies dealing with the evidence on the relation between outcome and workload. Using administrative data of a sickness fund in the region of Rhineland, Germany, the number of hospitals and patients affected by minimum work-loads was determined. RESULTS Study results show that in general a minimum workload of 100 to 150 new diagnosed cases per year and hospital is recommended. These recommendations would lead to 46% of the presently treating hospitals being excluded (minimum work-load of 150 cases; year 2001). If the workload is set to 100 cases, 31% of the hospitals will be excluded from breast cancer management. No significant differences could be detected in the data of the years 2000 and 2001. DISCUSSION The association between minimum workload and outcome of care seems to be evident. Further studies involving larger regions are needed to evaluate the distributional effects and gains of outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Lüngen
- Institut für Gesundheitsökonomie und Klinische Epidemiologie der Universität zu Köln.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|