1
|
Bhatnagar R, Piotrowska HEG, Laskawiec-Szkonter M, Kahan BC, Luengo-Fernandez R, Pepperell JCT, Evison MD, Holme J, Al-Aloul M, Psallidas I, Lim WS, Blyth KG, Roberts ME, Cox G, Downer NJ, Herre J, Sivasothy P, Menzies D, Munavvar M, Kyi MM, Ahmed L, West AG, Harrison RN, Prudon B, Hettiarachchi G, Chakrabarti B, Kavidasan A, Sutton BP, Zahan-Evans NJ, Quaddy JL, Edey AJ, Clive AO, Walker SP, Little MHR, Mei XW, Harvey JE, Hooper CE, Davies HE, Slade M, Sivier M, Miller RF, Rahman NM, Maskell NA. Effect of Thoracoscopic Talc Poudrage vs Talc Slurry via Chest Tube on Pleurodesis Failure Rate Among Patients With Malignant Pleural Effusions: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2020; 323:60-69. [PMID: 31804680 PMCID: PMC6990658 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.19997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is challenging to manage. Talc pleurodesis is a common and effective treatment. There are no reliable data, however, regarding the optimal method for talc delivery, leading to differences in practice and recommendations. OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis that administration of talc poudrage during thoracoscopy with local anesthesia is more effective than talc slurry delivered via chest tube in successfully inducing pleurodesis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Open-label, randomized clinical trial conducted at 17 UK hospitals. A total of 330 participants were enrolled from August 2012 to April 2018 and followed up until October 2018. Patients were eligible if they were older than 18 years, had a confirmed diagnosis of MPE, and could undergo thoracoscopy with local anesthesia. Patients were excluded if they required a thoracoscopy for diagnostic purposes or had evidence of nonexpandable lung. INTERVENTIONS Patients randomized to the talc poudrage group (n = 166) received 4 g of talc poudrage during thoracoscopy while under moderate sedation, while patients randomized to the control group (n = 164) underwent bedside chest tube insertion with local anesthesia followed by administration of 4 g of sterile talc slurry. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was pleurodesis failure up to 90 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes included pleurodesis failure at 30 and 180 days; time to pleurodesis failure; number of nights spent in the hospital over 90 days; patient-reported thoracic pain and dyspnea at 7, 30, 90, and 180 days; health-related quality of life at 30, 90, and 180 days; all-cause mortality; and percentage of opacification on chest radiograph at drain removal and at 30, 90, and 180 days. RESULTS Among 330 patients who were randomized (mean age, 68 years; 181 [55%] women), 320 (97%) were included in the primary outcome analysis. At 90 days, the pleurodesis failure rate was 36 of 161 patients (22%) in the talc poudrage group and 38 of 159 (24%) in the talc slurry group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.54-1.55]; P = .74; difference, -1.8% [95% CI, -10.7% to 7.2%]). No statistically significant differences were noted in any of the 24 prespecified secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients with malignant pleural effusion, thoracoscopic talc poudrage, compared with talc slurry delivered via chest tube, resulted in no significant difference in the rate of pleurodesis failure at 90 days. However, the study may have been underpowered to detect small but potentially important differences. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN Identifier: ISRCTN47845793.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul Bhatnagar
- Academic Respiratory Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- North Bristol Lung Centre, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Hania E. G. Piotrowska
- Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Magda Laskawiec-Szkonter
- Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Brennan C. Kahan
- Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ramon Luengo-Fernandez
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Justin C. T. Pepperell
- Somerset Lung Centre, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton and Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew D. Evison
- North West Lung Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Jayne Holme
- North West Lung Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Mohamed Al-Aloul
- North West Lung Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Ioannis Psallidas
- Lungs for Living Research Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Wei Shen Lim
- Respiratory Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom
- University of Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Kevin G. Blyth
- Glasgow Pleural Disease Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
- Institute of Infection, Immunity & Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Mark E. Roberts
- Respiratory Department, Sherwood Forest Hospitals Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Giles Cox
- Respiratory Department, Sherwood Forest Hospitals Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola J. Downer
- Respiratory Department, Sherwood Forest Hospitals Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Jurgen Herre
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Pasupathy Sivasothy
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | - Mohammed Munavvar
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS, Foundation Trust, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Moe M. Kyi
- Respiratory Department, Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, United Kingdom
| | - Liju Ahmed
- Respiratory Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alex G. West
- Respiratory Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Richard N. Harrison
- Respiratory Medicine, North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton-on-Tees, United Kingdom
| | - Benjamin Prudon
- Respiratory Medicine, North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton-on-Tees, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Ajikumar Kavidasan
- Milton Keynes University Hospital, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom
- Croydon University Hospital, Croydon, United Kingdom
| | - Benjamin P. Sutton
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Natalie J. Zahan-Evans
- Academic Respiratory Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- North Bristol Lung Centre, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Jack L. Quaddy
- Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Anthony J. Edey
- North Bristol Lung Centre, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Amelia O. Clive
- Academic Respiratory Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- North Bristol Lung Centre, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Steven P. Walker
- Academic Respiratory Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- North Bristol Lung Centre, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew H. R. Little
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Xue W. Mei
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - John E. Harvey
- North Bristol Lung Centre, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Clare E. Hooper
- Worcester Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester, United Kingdom
| | - Helen E. Davies
- Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Wales, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Slade
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Robert F. Miller
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Najib M. Rahman
- Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Nick A. Maskell
- Academic Respiratory Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- North Bristol Lung Centre, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dixon G, Lama-Lopez A, Bintcliffe OJ, Morley AJ, Hooper CE, Maskell NA. The role of serum procalcitonin in establishing the diagnosis and prognosis of pleural infection. Respir Res 2017; 18:30. [PMID: 28158976 PMCID: PMC5291982 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-017-0501-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2016] [Accepted: 01/02/2017] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Bacterial pleural infection requires prompt identification to enable appropriate investigation and treatment. In contrast to commonly used biomarkers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and white cell count (WCC), which can be raised due to non-infective inflammatory processes, procalcitonin (PCT) has been proposed as a specific biomarker of bacterial infection. The utility of PCT in this role is yet to be validated in a large prospective trial. This study aimed to identify whether serum PCT is superior to CRP and WCC in establishing the diagnosis of bacterial pleural infection. Methods Consecutive patients presenting to a tertiary pleural service between 2008 and 2013 were recruited to a well-established pleural disease study. Consent was obtained to store pleural fluid and relevant clinical information. Serum CRP, WCC and PCT were measured. A diagnosis was agreed upon by two independent consultants after a minimum of 12 months. The study was performed and reported according to the STARD reporting guidelines. Results 80/425 patients enrolled in the trial had a unilateral pleural effusion secondary to infection. 10/80 (12.5%) patients had positive pleural fluid microbiology. Investigations for viral causes of effusion were not performed. ROC curve analysis of 425 adult patients with unilateral undiagnosed pleural effusions showed no statistically significant difference in the diagnostic utility of PCT (AUC 0.77), WCC (AUC 0.77) or CRP (AUC 0.85) for the identification of bacterial pleural infection. Serum procalcitonin >0.085 μg/l has a sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value of 0.69, 0.80, 0.46 and 0.91 respectively for the identification of pleural infection. The diagnostic utility of procalcitonin was not affected by prior antibiotic use (p = 0.80). Conclusions The study presents evidence that serum procalcitonin is not superior to CRP and WCC for the diagnosis of bacterial pleural infection. The study suggests routine procalcitonin testing in all patients with unilateral pleural effusion is not beneficial however further investigation may identify specific patient subsets that may benefit. Trial registration The trial was registered with the UK Clinical Research Network (UKCRN ID 8960). The trial was approved by the South West Regional Ethics Committee (Ethical approval number 08/H0102/11). Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12931-017-0501-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giles Dixon
- Academic Respiratory Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK
| | | | | | - Anna J Morley
- North Bristol Lung Centre, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Nick A Maskell
- Academic Respiratory Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK. .,North Bristol Lung Centre, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hooper CE, Edey AJ, Wallis A, Clive AO, Morley A, White P, Medford ARL, Harvey JE, Darby M, Zahan-Evans N, Maskell NA. Pleural irrigation trial (PIT): a randomised controlled trial of pleural irrigation with normal saline versus standard care in patients with pleural infection. Eur Respir J 2015; 46:456-63. [PMID: 26022948 DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00147214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2014] [Accepted: 03/12/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Pleural infection is increasing in incidence. Despite optimal medical management, up to 30% of patients will die or require surgery. Case reports suggest that irrigation of the pleural space with saline may be beneficial.A randomised controlled pilot study in which saline pleural irrigation (three times per day for 3 days) plus best-practice management was compared with best-practice management alone was performed in patients with pleural infection requiring chest-tube drainage. The primary outcome was percentage change in computed tomography pleural fluid volume from day 0 to day 3. Secondary outcomes included surgical referral rate, hospital stay and adverse events.35 patients were randomised. Patients receiving saline irrigation had a significantly greater reduction in pleural collection volume on computed tomography compared to those receiving standard care (median (interquartile range) 32.3% (19.6-43.7%) reduction versus 15.3% (-5.5-28%) reduction) (p<0.04). Significantly fewer patients in the irrigation group were referred for surgery (OR 7.1, 95% CI 1.23-41.0; p=0.03). There was no difference in length of hospital stay, fall in C-reactive protein, white cell count or procalcitonin or adverse events between the treatment groups, and no serious complications were documented.Saline irrigation improves pleural fluid drainage and reduces referrals for surgery in pleural infection. A large multicentre randomised controlled trial is now warranted to evaluate its effects further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare E Hooper
- Academic Respiratory Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK Pleural Clinical Trials Unit, North Bristol Lung Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Anthony J Edey
- Department of Radiology, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Anthony Wallis
- Department of Radiology, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Amelia O Clive
- Academic Respiratory Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK Pleural Clinical Trials Unit, North Bristol Lung Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Anna Morley
- Pleural Clinical Trials Unit, North Bristol Lung Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Paul White
- Statistical Department, University of West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Andrew R L Medford
- Pleural Clinical Trials Unit, North Bristol Lung Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - John E Harvey
- Pleural Clinical Trials Unit, North Bristol Lung Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Mike Darby
- Department of Radiology, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Natalie Zahan-Evans
- Pleural Clinical Trials Unit, North Bristol Lung Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Nick A Maskell
- Academic Respiratory Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK Pleural Clinical Trials Unit, North Bristol Lung Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Arnold DT, Hooper CE, Morley A, White P, Lyburn ID, Searle J, Darby M, Hall T, Hall D, Rahman NM, De Winton E, Clive A, Masani V, Dangoor A, Guglani S, Jankowska P, Lowndes SA, Harvey JE, Braybrooke JP, Maskell NA. The effect of chemotherapy on health-related quality of life in mesothelioma: results from the SWAMP trial. Br J Cancer 2015; 112:1183-9. [PMID: 25756395 PMCID: PMC4385962 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.77] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2014] [Revised: 01/25/2015] [Accepted: 02/01/2015] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The effect of chemotherapy on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is poorly understood. Patient-individualised prognostication and prediction of treatment response from chemotherapy is useful but little evidence exists to guide practice. Method: Consecutive patients with MPM who were fit for first-line chemotherapy with pemetrexed and cisplatin\carboplatin were recruited and followed up for a minimum of 12 months. This study focussed on the HRQoL outcomes of these patients using the EQ-5D, EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC13. Results: Seventy-three patients were recruited of which 58 received chemotherapy and 15 opted for best supportive care (BSC). Compliance with HRQoL questionnaires was 98% at baseline. The chemotherapy group maintained HRQoL compared with the BSC group whose overall HRQoL fell (P=0.006) with worsening dyspnoea and pain. The impact of chemotherapy was irrespective of histological subtype although those with non-epithelioid disease had worse HRQoL at later time points (P=0.012). Additionally, those with a falling mesothelin or improvement on modified-RECIST CT at early follow-up had a better HRQoL at 16 weeks. Conclusions: HRQoL was maintained following chemotherapy compared with a self-selected BSC group. Once chemotherapy is initiated, a falling mesothelin or improved RECIST CT findings infer a quality-of-life advantage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D T Arnold
- Academic Respiratory Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK
| | - C E Hooper
- 1] Academic Respiratory Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK [2] North Bristol Lung Centre, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK
| | - A Morley
- North Bristol Lung Centre, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK
| | - P White
- Applied Statistics Group, University of West of England (UWE), Bristol BS16 1QY, UK
| | - I D Lyburn
- Cobalt Health, Thirlestaine Road, Cheltenham GL53 7AS, UK
| | - J Searle
- Cobalt Health, Thirlestaine Road, Cheltenham GL53 7AS, UK
| | - M Darby
- Department of Radiology, Southmead Hopsital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK
| | - T Hall
- Department of Radiology, Royal United Hospital Bath, Bath BA1 3NG, UK
| | - D Hall
- Cobalt Health, Thirlestaine Road, Cheltenham GL53 7AS, UK
| | - N M Rahman
- Oxford Respiratory Clinical Trial Unit (Funded by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre), Churchill Hospital, Oxford OX3 7LJ, UK
| | - E De Winton
- Department of Oncology, Royal United Hospital Bath, Bath BA1 3NG, UK
| | - A Clive
- Academic Respiratory Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK
| | - V Masani
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal United Hospital Bath, Bath BA1 3NG, UK
| | - A Dangoor
- Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol BS2 8ED, UK
| | - S Guglani
- Department of Oncology, Cheltenham General Hospital, Cheltenham GL53 7AN, UK
| | - P Jankowska
- Department of Oncology, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, Severn TA1 5DA, UK
| | - S A Lowndes
- Department of Oncology, Great Western Hospital, Swindon SN3 6BB, UK
| | - J E Harvey
- North Bristol Lung Centre, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK
| | - J P Braybrooke
- Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol BS2 8ED, UK
| | - N A Maskell
- 1] Academic Respiratory Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK [2] North Bristol Lung Centre, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Arnold DT, Rowen D, Versteegh MM, Morley A, Hooper CE, Maskell NA. Testing mapping algorithms of the cancer-specific EORTC QLQ-C30 onto EQ-5D in malignant mesothelioma. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2015; 13:6. [PMID: 25613110 PMCID: PMC4316600 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-014-0196-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2014] [Accepted: 12/17/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In order to estimate utilities for cancer studies where the EQ-5D was not used, the EORTC QLQ-C30 can be used to estimate EQ-5D using existing mapping algorithms. Several mapping algorithms exist for this transformation, however, algorithms tend to lose accuracy in patients in poor health states. The aim of this study was to test all existing mapping algorithms of QLQ-C30 onto EQ-5D, in a dataset of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, an invariably fatal malignancy where no previous mapping estimation has been published. Methods Health related quality of life (HRQoL) data where both the EQ-5D and QLQ-C30 were used simultaneously was obtained from the UK-based prospective observational SWAMP (South West Area Mesothelioma and Pemetrexed) trial. In the original trial 73 patients with pleural mesothelioma were offered palliative chemotherapy and their HRQoL was assessed across five time points. This data was used to test the nine available mapping algorithms found in the literature, comparing predicted against observed EQ-5D values. The ability of algorithms to predict the mean, minimise error and detect clinically significant differences was assessed. Results The dataset had a total of 250 observations across 5 timepoints. The linear regression mapping algorithms tested generally performed poorly, over-estimating the predicted compared to observed EQ-5D values, especially when observed EQ-5D was below 0.5. The best performing algorithm used a response mapping method and predicted the mean EQ-5D with accuracy with an average root mean squared error of 0.17 (Standard Deviation; 0.22). This algorithm reliably discriminated between clinically distinct subgroups seen in the primary dataset. Conclusions This study tested mapping algorithms in a population with poor health states, where they have been previously shown to perform poorly. Further research into EQ-5D estimation should be directed at response mapping methods given its superior performance in this study. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12955-014-0196-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David T Arnold
- Academic Respiratory Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| | - Donna Rowen
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
| | - Matthijs M Versteegh
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University of Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Anna Morley
- Academic Respiratory Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| | - Clare E Hooper
- Academic Respiratory Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| | - Nicholas A Maskell
- Academic Respiratory Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Clive AO, Kahan BC, Hooper CE, Bhatnagar R, Morley AJ, Zahan-Evans N, Bintcliffe OJ, Boshuizen RC, Fysh ETH, Tobin CL, Medford ARL, Harvey JE, van den Heuvel MM, Lee YCG, Maskell NA. Predicting survival in malignant pleural effusion: development and validation of the LENT prognostic score. Thorax 2014; 69:1098-104. [PMID: 25100651 PMCID: PMC4251306 DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-205285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 250] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) causes debilitating breathlessness and predicting survival is challenging. This study aimed to obtain contemporary data on survival by underlying tumour type in patients with MPE, identify prognostic indicators of overall survival and develop and validate a prognostic scoring system. METHODS Three large international cohorts of patients with MPE were used to calculate survival by cell type (univariable Cox model). The prognostic value of 14 predefined variables was evaluated in the most complete data set (multivariable Cox model). A clinical prognostic scoring system was then developed and validated. RESULTS Based on the results of the international data and the multivariable survival analysis, the LENT prognostic score (pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score (PS), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and tumour type) was developed and subsequently validated using an independent data set. Risk stratifying patients into low-risk, moderate-risk and high-risk groups gave median (IQR) survivals of 319 days (228-549; n=43), 130 days (47-467; n=129) and 44 days (22-77; n=31), respectively. Only 65% (20/31) of patients with a high-risk LENT score survived 1 month from diagnosis and just 3% (1/31) survived 6 months. Analysis of the area under the receiver operating curve revealed the LENT score to be superior at predicting survival compared with ECOG PS at 1 month (0.77 vs 0.66, p<0.01), 3 months (0.84 vs 0.75, p<0.01) and 6 months (0.85 vs 0.76, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS The LENT scoring system is the first validated prognostic score in MPE, which predicts survival with significantly better accuracy than ECOG PS alone. This may aid clinical decision making in this diverse patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia O Clive
- Academic Respiratory Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- North Bristol Lung Centre, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Brennan C Kahan
- Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Clare E Hooper
- Academic Respiratory Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- North Bristol Lung Centre, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Rahul Bhatnagar
- Academic Respiratory Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- North Bristol Lung Centre, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Anna J Morley
- North Bristol Lung Centre, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Natalie Zahan-Evans
- North Bristol Lung Centre, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Oliver J Bintcliffe
- North Bristol Lung Centre, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Rogier C Boshuizen
- Thoracic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Edward T H Fysh
- Respiratory Department, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
- Centre for Asthma, Allergy & Respiratory Research, School of Medicine & Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Claire L Tobin
- Respiratory Department, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Andrew R L Medford
- North Bristol Lung Centre, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - John E Harvey
- North Bristol Lung Centre, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Michel M van den Heuvel
- Thoracic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Y C Gary Lee
- Respiratory Department, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
- Centre for Asthma, Allergy & Respiratory Research, School of Medicine & Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Nick A Maskell
- Academic Respiratory Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- North Bristol Lung Centre, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bhatnagar R, Laskawiec-Szkonter M, Piotrowska HEG, Kahan BC, Hooper CE, Davies HE, Harvey JE, Miller RF, Rahman NM, Maskell NA. Evaluating the efficacy of thoracoscopy and talc poudrage versus pleurodesis using talc slurry (TAPPS trial): protocol of an open-label randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2014; 4:e007045. [PMID: 25428632 PMCID: PMC4248086 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The management of recurrent malignant pleural effusions (MPE) can be challenging. Various options are available, with the most efficacious and widely used being talc pleurodesis. Talc can either be applied via a chest drain in the form of slurry, or at medical thoracoscopy using poudrage. Current evidence regarding which method is most effective is conflicting and often methodologically flawed. The TAPPS trial is a suitably powered, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial designed to compare the pleurodesis success rate of medical thoracoscopy and talc poudrage with chest drain insertion and talc slurry. METHODS AND ANALYSIS 330 patients with a confirmed MPE requiring intervention will be recruited from UK hospitals. Patients will be randomised (1:1) to undergo either small bore (<14 Fr) Seldinger chest drain insertion followed by instillation of sterile talc (4 g), or to undergo medical thoracoscopy and simultaneous poudrage (4 g). The allocated procedure will be performed as an inpatient within 3 days of randomisation taking place. Following discharge, patients will be followed up at regular intervals for 6 months. The primary outcome measure is pleurodesis failure rates at 3 months. Pleurodesis failure is defined as the need for further pleural intervention for fluid management on the side of the trial intervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The trial has received ethical approval from the National Research Ethics Service Committee North West-Preston (12/NW/0467). There is a trial steering committee which includes independent members and a patient and public representative. The trial results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at international conferences, as well as being disseminated via local and national charities and patient groups. All participants who wish to know the study results will also be contacted directly on their publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN47845793.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul Bhatnagar
- Respiratory Research Unit, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
- Academic Respiratory Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | | | - Brennan C Kahan
- Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Clare E Hooper
- Respiratory Department, Worcestershire Royal Hospital, Worcester, UK
| | - Helen E Davies
- Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| | - John E Harvey
- Respiratory Research Unit, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
- Academic Respiratory Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Robert F Miller
- Research Department of Infection and Population Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, University College London, London, UK
- Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Najib M Rahman
- Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Nick A Maskell
- Respiratory Research Unit, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
- Academic Respiratory Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
|
9
|
Young RL, Bhatnagar R, Mason ZD, Benson AJ, Hooper CE, Clive AO, Zahan-Evans N, Morley AJ, Harvey JE, Medford ARL, Maskell NA. S78 Evalution of an ambulatory pleural service: costs and benefits: Abstract S78 Table 1. Thorax 2013. [DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-204457.85] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
10
|
Bhatnagar R, Clive AO, Zahan-Evans N, Morley AJ, Virgo PF, Medford ARL, Harvey JE, Hooper CE, Otton SH, Brett M, Maskell NA. P209 The clinical utility of pleural lymphocyte subset analysis in undiagnosed effusions: Abstract P209 Table 1. Thorax 2013. [DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-204457.361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
11
|
Clive AO, Hooper CE, Fysh ETH, Tobin C, Morley AJ, Zahan N, Sellar C, Bhatnagar R, Medford AR, Lee YCG, Maskell NA. S16 A Large, Prospective, Multicentre Study Evaluating the Survival of Patients with Malignant Pleural Effusion According to the Underlying Cell Type. Thorax 2012. [DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-202678.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
12
|
Hooper CE, Edey AJ, Wallis AJ, Clive AO, Morley AJ, Darby M, Zahan N, Harvey JE, Medford AR, Maskell NA. S17 Pleural Irrigation Trial (PIT): Standard Care Versus Pleural Irrigation, a Randomised Controlled Trial in Patients with Pleural Infection. Thorax 2012. [DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-202678.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
13
|
Hooper CE, Morley AJ, Virgo P, Harvey JE, Kahan B, Maskell NA. A prospective trial evaluating the role of mesothelin in undiagnosed pleural effusions. Eur Respir J 2012; 41:18-24. [PMID: 22790919 DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00148211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Mesothelin has been proposed as a useful tool in the diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). We aimed to examine its diagnostic utility and the impact of renal impairment on results. We prospectively recruited 230 patients with new undiagnosed pleural effusions, testing serum (n=216) and pleural fluid (n=206) mesothelin (by ELISA) during the initial consultation. 28 (12%) out of 230 patients had MPM. Serum mesothelin gave sensitivity 59.3%, specificity 64.7%, negative predictive value (NPV) 91.2%, positive predictive value (PPV) 20.5%, and pleural fluid sensitivity 72.0%, specificity 87.5%, NPV 95.5%, PPV 46.2% for distinguishing effusions due to MPM. In a matched comparison, diagnostic characteristics of pleural fluid mesothelin were superior to serum (p=0.0001). Serum mesothelin levels in patients without MPM were higher in patients with renal impairment (p=0.007) while pleural fluid levels were unaffected. 19 (54%) out of 35 patients with a benign pleural effusion and an estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤ 59 mL · min(-1) had a false-positive serum mesothelin result. The diagnostic accuracy of pleural fluid mesothelin is superior to that of serum and is unaffected by renal function. In patients with a low pre-test probability of mesothelioma, a negative mesothelin test could be reassuring, because of its high NPV. Routine use of mesothelin testing in undiagnosed pleural effusions at presentation appears to be unhelpful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare E Hooper
- North Bristol Lung Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rahman NM, Maskell NA, West A, Teoh R, Arnold A, Mackinlay C, Peckham D, Davies CWH, Ali N, Kinnear W, Bentley A, Kahan BC, Wrightson JM, Davies HE, Hooper CE, Lee YCG, Hedley EL, Crosthwaite N, Choo L, Helm EJ, Gleeson FV, Nunn AJ, Davies RJO. Intrapleural use of tissue plasminogen activator and DNase in pleural infection. N Engl J Med 2011; 365:518-26. [PMID: 21830966 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1012740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 465] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND More than 30% of patients with pleural infection either die or require surgery. Drainage of infected fluid is key to successful treatment, but intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy did not improve outcomes in an earlier, large, randomized trial. METHODS We conducted a blinded, 2-by-2 factorial trial in which 210 patients with pleural infection were randomly assigned to receive one of four study treatments for 3 days: double placebo, intrapleural tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and DNase, t-PA and placebo, or DNase and placebo. The primary outcome was the change in pleural opacity, measured as the percentage of the hemithorax occupied by effusion, on chest radiography on day 7 as compared with day 1. Secondary outcomes included referral for surgery, duration of hospital stay, and adverse events. RESULTS The mean (±SD) change in pleural opacity was greater in the t-PA-DNase group than in the placebo group (-29.5±23.3% vs. -17.2±19.6%; difference, -7.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -13.4 to -2.4; P=0.005); the change observed with t-PA alone and with DNase alone (-17.2±24.3 and -14.7±16.4%, respectively) was not significantly different from that observed with placebo. The frequency of surgical referral at 3 months was lower in the t-PA-DNase group than in the placebo group (2 of 48 patients [4%] vs. 8 of 51 patients [16%]; odds ratio for surgical referral, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.87; P=0.03) but was greater in the DNase group (18 of 46 patients [39%]) than in the placebo group (odds ratio, 3.56; 95% CI, 1.30 to 9.75; P=0.01). Combined t-PA-DNase therapy was associated with a reduction in the hospital stay, as compared with placebo (difference, -6.7 days; 95% CI, -12.0 to -1.9; P=0.006); the hospital stay with either agent alone was not significantly different from that with placebo. The frequency of adverse events did not differ significantly among the groups. CONCLUSIONS Intrapleural t-PA-DNase therapy improved fluid drainage in patients with pleural infection and reduced the frequency of surgical referral and the duration of the hospital stay. Treatment with DNase alone or t-PA alone was ineffective. (Funded by an unrestricted educational grant to the University of Oxford from Roche UK and by others; Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN57454527.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Najib M Rahman
- UKCRC Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Churchill Hospital Site, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Photon imaging is an increasingly important technique for the measurement and analysis of chemiluminescence and bioluminescence. New high-performance low-light level imaging systems have recently become available for the life sciences. These systems use advances in camcera design and digital image processing and are now being used for a wide range of luminescence applications. They offer good sensitivity for photon detection and large dynamic range, and are suitable for quantitative analysis. This is achieved using a range of software techniques including image arithmetic, histogramming or summing regions of interest, feature extraction and multiple image processing for kinetics or assay screening. Improvements in image-processing hardware and software have increased the usefulness of these systems in the biosciences. Low-light imaging is a rapid and non-invasive method for the sensitive detection and analysis of luminescent assays. As such it offers a powerful and sensitive tool for investigating processes, both at the cellular level (luc and lux reporter genes, intracellular signalling) and for measurement of macro samples (immunoassays, gels and blots, tissue sections).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C E Hooper
- Cambridge Imaging Ltd, St John's Innovation Centre, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Quantitative and sensitive imaging of chemiluminescence, bioluminescence and fluorescence emissions is emerging as an increasingly important technique for a range of biomedical applications (Hooper et al., 1990). A brief review of low-light-level imaging is presented, with particular reference to charge-coupled devices (CCD). Detectors for sensitive imaging are described and compared, including various CCDs and photon-counting devices. Image analysis techniques based on digital image processing, may be applied to quantify luminescent processes with these detectors. Images of luciferase gene expression in single mammalian cells have been obtained using a particular high-sensitivity intensified CCD camera. The method is illustrated using cell monolayers infected with recombinant vaccinia virus encoding the firefly luciferase, luc gene (Rodriguez et al., 1988). The CCD camera has been used to detect luciferase expression in single, recombinant infected cells amongst over one million non-infected cells. The rapid detection of luciferase-expressing viruses may be used for the selection of virus deletion mutants into which the luciferase gene has been cloned at specific sites. This is particularly useful in the case of viruses such as cytomegalovirus which have slow replication cycles. This direct imaging technique is simple and versatile. It offers a rapid, non-invasive method for the sensitive detection of luciferase activity in single, luciferase-expressing cells. One can envisage the use of luciferase as a sensitive and convenient co-selection marker gene in the analysis of both gene expression and protein function. These methods offer tremendous potential in the fields of molecular and cellular biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C E Hooper
- Robens Institute, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Robichon J, Desjardins JP, Koch M, Hooper CE. The femoral neck in Legg-Perthes' disease. Its relationship to epiphysial change and its importance in early prognosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1974; 56:62-8. [PMID: 4818856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
|